Developing qualitative extraction profiles of coffee aromas utilizing polymeric ionic liquid sorbent coatings in headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Two solid-phase microextraction (SPME) sorbent coatings based on polymeric ionic liquids (PILs) have been utilized for the analysis of complex coffee aroma samples. The PIL-based SPME coatings examined, namely, poly(1-(4-vinylbenzyl)-3-hexadecylimidazolium bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide) [poly(VBHDIm⁺ NTf₂⁻)], with ∼14-μm thickness, and poly(1-vinyl-3-hexylimidazolium chloride) [poly(ViHIm⁺ Cl⁻)], with ∼8-μm thickness, were employed for the headspace determination of up to 49 analytes from four different coffee beans: two French roast coffees of different brands, Sumatra coffee, and decaffeinated Sumatra coffee. The analysis was conducted using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. For comparative purposes, the commercial polyacrylate (PA, 85-μm film thickness) SPME coating was utilized under the same extraction conditions. The three SPME coatings tested behaved quite differently as a function of the families of compounds extracted. Thus, the poly(VBHDIm⁺ NTf₂⁻) coating was extremely selective for aldehydes while also exhibiting good extraction efficiencies for acids. The poly-(ViHIm⁺ Cl⁻) coating exhibited superior performance for aromatic alcohols, and the PA coating worked better for heterocyclic aromatics. Both PIL-based SPME sorbent coatings demonstrated exceptional selectivity and extraction efficiency when dealing with complex coffee aromas in spite of their small film thicknesses.     

Application of SPME to the determination of alkylphenols and bisphenol A in cyanobacteria culture media

In order to survey the influence of estrogenic compounds on cyanobacteria, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a carbowax-divinylbenzene fibre was used for the determination of tert-octylphenol (tert-OP), n-nonylphenol (n-NP), technical nonylphenol (tech-NP) and bisphenol A (BPA) in cyanobacteria culture media by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. Determinations were carried out without derivatization in deionized water and filtered culture media. A comparison between f2 and Fraquil culture media was performed, which showed that only f2 allowed quantitative recoveries. Headspace SPME with salting out, requiring only 10 mL of sample, was suitable for tert-OP, n-NP, and tech-NP determination with limits of detection (LOD) of <0.05 μg L⁻¹. For BPA, direct immersion SPME could provide a LOD of 1 μg L⁻¹. Automated sampling allowed reproducible extraction. No exudate substances overlapped with the studied compounds during the chromatographic separation and no matrix effects were observed. Ecotoxicity tests can be performed by single spiking of tert-OP and tech-NP and multiple spiking of n-NP due to its lower stability.     

Development of Electro Solid-Phase Microextraction and Application to Methamphetamine Analysis

A new electro solid-phase microextraction (El-SPME) technique using homemade pencil-lead fibers has been developed as an effective means of selective extraction of methamphetamine before analysis by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The methamphetamine was extracted by use of a laboratory-made El-SPME cell with three electrodes—the pencil-lead SPME fiber, Ag/AgCl, and platinum as working, reference, and auxiliary electrodes, respectively. A negative potential was applied to the homemade pencil-lead fiber during extraction. Experimental conditions, for example type of pencil-lead fiber, conditions for modification of the fiber, extraction time, applied potential, pH, and gas chromatographic conditions were optimized. Methamphetamine was identified by GC–MS. Screening of the extracted compounds showed that the proposed El-SPME technique is much more selective than direct SPME using a commercially available polyacrylate fiber. Under the optimum conditions the calibration plot for the compound was linear in the range 50–3,200 ng mL⁻¹ and the detection limit was 34 ng mL⁻¹.     

Comparison of extraction techniques for gas chromatographic determination of volatile carbonyl compounds in alcohols

Two extraction procedures, i.e. conventional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and liquid solid-phase microextraction (SPME) for extraction of the oximes formed after derivatization of carbonyl compounds with o-(2,3, 4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl) hydroxylamine (PFBHA) in alcoholic solutions have been compared. The limit of detection for LLE followed by GC-ECD determination of C₁–C₆ was in the range of 0.23–3.3 μg/L, whereas for liquid SPME 0.005–0.33 μg/L. Both methods elaborated can be applied to the determination of carbonyl compounds present in spirits and alcoholic beverages. Received: 26 September 2000 / Revised: 14 January 2001 / Accepted: 16 January 2001     

A combination of statistical and analytical evaluation methods as a new optimization strategy for the quantification of pharmaceutical residues in sewage effluent

In this study, a new solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method for simultaneous extraction of pharmaceutical compounds with acidic and basic characteristics (ibuprofen, fenoprofen, diclofenac, diazepam and loratadine) from residual water samples is proposed. In this procedure, the extraction is processed using two distinct sample pH values. The extraction is begun at pH 2.5 to promote the sorption of acidic pharmaceuticals and after 35 min the sample pH is changed to 7.0 by adding 0.4 mol L⁻¹ disodium hydrogenphosphate, so that the basic compounds can be sorbed by the fiber (20 min). The pH change is performed without interruption of the extraction process. A comparison between the proposed method and the SPME method applied to each group of the target compounds was performed. Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry was used for separation and detection of analytes. The extraction conditions for the three methods were optimized using full factorial experimental design, response surface through a Doehlert matrix and central composite design. Limits of detection (0.02-0.43 μg L⁻¹) and correlation coefficients (0.9970-0.9998) were determined for the three methods. The proposed extraction procedure was applied to samples of sewage treatment plant effluent and untreated wastewater. Recovery and relative standard deviation values ranged from 67 to 116% and 4.6 to 14.5%, respectively, for all compounds studied. Modification of sample pH during the extraction procedure was shown to be an excellent option for all of the compounds and may be extended to the simultaneous extraction of other compounds with different acid-base characteristics.     

Determination of water pollutants by direct-immersion solid-phase microextraction using polymeric ionic liquid coatings

The determination of a group of eighteen pollutants in waters, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and substituted phenols, is conducted in direct-immersion solid-phase microextraction (SPME) using the polymeric ionic liquid (PIL) poly(1-vinyl-3-hexadecylimidazolium) bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide as a novel coating material. The performance of the PIL fiber coating in the developed IL-SPME-gas chromatography (GC)–mass spectrometry (MS) method is characterized by average relative recoveries of 92.5% for deionized waters and 90.8% for well waters, average precision values (as relative standard deviations, RSD%) of 11% for deionized waters and 12% for well waters, using a spiked level of 5 ng mL⁻¹. The detection limits oscillate from 0.005 ng mL⁻¹ for fluoranthene to 4.4 ng mL⁻¹ for 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, when using an extraction time of 60 min with 20 mL of aqueous sample. The extraction capabilities of the PIL fiber have been compared with the commercial SPME coatings: polydimethylsyloxane (PDMS) 30 μm, PDMS 100 μm and polyacrylate (PA) 85 μm. The PIL fiber is superior to the PDMS 30 μm for all analytes studied. A qualitative study was also carried out to compare among the nature of the coating materials by normalizing the coating thickness. The PIL material was shown to be more efficient than the PDMS material for all analytes studied. The PIL coating was also adequate for nonpolar analytes whereas the PA material was more sensitive for polar compounds.     

Determination of phenolic compounds in water samples by on-line solid-phase extraction—supercritical-fluid chromatography with diode-array detection

Summary The eleven Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) priority phenolic compounds have been determined by solid-phase extraction (SPE) coupled on-line to supercritical-fluid chromatography (SFC) with diodearray detection. The variables affecting chromatographic separation were optimized and the analytes were separated at 40 °C in two diol columns connected in series; a gradient of methanol, as modifier, and CO₂ was used as mobile phase. Under these conditions, all the compounds studied were separated to baseline in less than 13 min. PLRP-S and LiChrolut EN were tested as sorbents in a 10×3 mm i.d. laboratory-packed precolumn for solid-phase extraction. An ion-pair reagent, tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBA), was used in the extraction process to increase break-through volumes. The performance of the method was checked with tap and river waters and the pre-concentration of 20 mL of sample in a PLRP-S pre-column enabled phenolic compounds to be determined at low μg L⁻¹ levels with limits of detection ranging between 0.4 and 2 μg L⁻¹. The repeatability and reproducibility between days (n=3) for real samples spiked at 10 μg L⁻¹ were lower than 10%.     

Optimization of a sensitive method for the determination of nitro musk fragrances in waters by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with micro electron capture detection using factorial experimental design

A solid-phase microextraction method (SPME) followed by gas chromatography with micro electron capture detection for determining trace levels of nitro musk fragrances in residual waters was optimized. Four nitro musks, musk xylene, musk moskene, musk tibetene and musk ketone, were selected for the optimization of the method. Factors affecting the extraction process were studied using a multivariate approach. Two extraction modes (direct SPME and headspace SPME) were tried at different extraction temperatures using two fiber coatings [Carboxen–polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS) and polydimethylsiloxane–divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB)] selected among five commercial tested fibers. Sample agitation and the salting-out effect were also factors studied. The main effects and interactions between the factors were studied for all the target compounds. An extraction temperature of 100 °C and sampling the headspace over the sample, using either CAR/PDMS or PDMS/DVB as fiber coatings, were found to be the experimental conditions that led to a more effective extraction. High sensitivity, with detection limits in the low nanogram per liter range, and good linearity and repeatability were achieved for all nitro musks. Since the method proposed performed well for real samples, it was applied to different water samples, including wastewater and sewage, in which some of the target compounds (musk xylene and musk ketone) were detected and quantified. Figure Stardardized Pareto charts for the main effects and interactions     

Attachment of nickel hexacyanoferrates nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes: preparation, characterization and bioapplication

Anilinemethyltriethoxysilane (AMTEOS) was first used as precursor as well as selective stationary phase to prepare the sol-gel derived anilinemethyltriethoxysilane/polydimethylsiloxane (AMTEOS/PDMS) solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers. The novel SPME fiber exhibits high extraction efficiency, good thermal stability and long lifetime compared with commercial SPME coatings. In addition, the phenyl groups in the porous layer can exhibit π-π interactions with aromatic compounds, such as monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (MAHs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Therefore, SPME using the AMTEOS/PDMS sol-gel fiber coupled with GC-FID was recommended as a sensitive and selective method towards the analysis of these compounds in environmental water samples. The optimal extraction conditions were investigated by adjusting extraction time, salt addition, extraction temperature, and desorption time. The method showed linearity between 2 and 4000 μg l⁻¹ for MAHs and 1 and 1000 μg l⁻¹ for PAHs. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.6-3.8 μg l⁻¹for MAHs and 0.2-1.5 μg l⁻¹ for PAHs. The novel AMTEOS/PDMS fiber was applied to extract small amount of aromatic compounds in wastewater and river water respectively. The recovery of the method was acceptable for quantitative analysis.     

Comparison of ultrasound-assisted extraction and direct immersion solid-phase microextraction methods for the analysis of monoterpenoids in wine

Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and direct immersion solid-phase microextraction (DI-SPME) were evaluated for the monoterpenic compounds determination in wine samples. The wine extracts obtained were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The optimization of the variables affecting UAE and SPME methods was carried out in order to achieve the best extraction efficiency. Both UAE and SPME are quantitative (recoveries in the range 93-97% and 71.8-90.9%, respectively), precise (coefficients of variation below 5.5%), sensitive (limits of detection between 30-39 μg L⁻¹ and 11-25 μg L⁻¹, respectively) and linear over one order of magnitude. The application of both methods to red wine samples showed that UAE provided higher extraction of monoterpenic compounds than SPME. Although SPME remains an attractive alternative technique due to its speed, low sample volume requirements and solvent free character.     

A new porous-layer activated-charcoal-coated fused silica fiber: Application for determination of BTEX compounds in water samples using headspace solid-phase microextraction and capillary gas chromatography

Summary Extra-fine powdered activated charcoal has been used as stationary phase (coating layer) in solid-phase microextraction (SPME). The efficiency and reliability of the prepared device have been investigated for the extraction of some volatile organic compounds such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene isomers (BTEX) from the headspace of water samples. Monitoring of the extracted compounds and further quantitative analysis of the real samples have been performed by capillary GC-FID. Effects of several factors such as temperature, addition of salt, and stirring speed on extraction efficiency and exposure time have been studied. Under optimum conditions, extraction recoveries for these compounds from 50 mL water were >95%. The calibration graphs were linear in the range 5 to 10⁴ pg mL⁻¹ and the detection limit for each BTEX compound was 1.5–2 pg mL⁻¹. The results obtained by use of this porous layer activated charcoal (PLAC)-coated fiber have also been compared with results reported in the literature by use of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated fiber. Presented at the 21^st ISC held in Stuttgart, Germany, 15^th–20^th September, 1996     

The use of solid-phase microextraction to rapidly measure dissolved PCBs in natural waters

A method to measure dissolved polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in natural waters on 30?min time frames using negligible depletion non-equilibrium solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was developed with detection limits ranging from 0.6 to 5.2?ng?L^?1. SPME fibres made from optical cable were inserted into a glass tube and attached to the shaft of a motor that revolved at 130?rpm to move the SPME fibres through the sampled water at a constant rate. To test for matrix interferences, measurements were made in three solutions with the same known dissolved PCB concentration but different matrices. Dissolved PCB measurements made in the presence of 8?mg?L^?1 of DOC and 200?mg?L^?1 of suspended solids were not significantly different from measurements made in deionized water, demonstrating that neither matrix interfered with SPME measurements of dissolved PCBs. PCB concentrations measured by XAD-2 resin extraction were greater than SPME measurements, suggesting that XAD measurements included DOC-associated PCBs.     

Multi-residual GC-MS determination of personal care products in waters using solid-phase microextraction

A multi-residual method is described for the simultaneous determination of 23 personal care products (PCPs), which display a wide range of physicochemical properties, present at trace levels in water samples. A one-step procedure was developed based on solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with GC-MS analysis. A chemometric approach consisting of an experimental design (design of experiments) was applied to systematically investigate how four operating parameters—extraction temperature and time and desorption temperature and time—affect extraction recovery of PCPs in water. The optimum SPME procedure operating conditions, those yielding the highest extraction recovery for all the compounds, were determined; they correspond to an extraction time of 90 min and temperature of 80 °C and a desorption time of 11 min and temperature of 260 °C. Under these optimized conditions, the SPME procedure shows good analytical performance characterized by high reproducibility (RSD% intra-day accuracy varying in the 0.01–1.3% range) as well as good linearity and low detection limits (LODs lower than 2 ppb for most of the investigated PCPs).     

Comparative analysis of volatile compounds of ‘fino’ sherry wine by rotatory and continuous liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction in conjunction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Different headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) methods have been selected and applied to the analysis of volatile compounds in ‘fino’ sherry wine by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. A method based on rotary and continuous liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) for analysis of these same compounds has been optimised. The best conditions to extract this type of compounds using SPME and LLE were determined and both methods were validated. Both methodologies show adequate detection and quantitation limits, and linear ranges for correctly analysing these compounds. The recoveries obtained were close to 100%, with good repeatability values. The analytical and procedural advantages and disadvantages of these two methods have been compared. In general, SPME presented higher sensitivities. Both analytical methods were used to analyse five samples of ‘fino’ sherry wine supplied by different producers. No significant differences were found between the techniques at a significance level of 5%. The regression coefficients (r²) for analysis using LLE and SPME exceeded 0.94 for all compounds. The LLE procedure is a method with high repeatability and has the possibility of simultaneous extraction of several samples (up to 12), however the SPME technique is a solvent-free method presenting major advantages, such as small sample volume and higher sensitivity and simplicity.     

In-Groove Carbon Nanotubes Device for SPME of Aromatic Hydrocarbons

A new solid phase microextraction (SPME) fibre using carbon nanotubes as fibre coating incorporated into a groove of a stainless steel rod is suggested. It is mechanically stable and exhibits relatively high thermal stability (up to 280 °C). The coating showed especially good extraction efficiency for aromatic hydrocarbons. The extraction properties of the fibre to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o-xylene were examined using both direct and headspace SPME modes coupled to gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. The parameters affecting the extraction efficiency (extraction temperature and time, salt addition, desorption temperature and time) were investigated and quality parameters were measured under the optimized conditions. For both headspace and direct SPME the calibration graphs were linear up to 100 mg L⁻¹ (R ² > 0.996) and detection limits ranged from 0.09 to 0.39 μg L⁻¹. The repeatabilities were 5.9–13.3%. The proposed coating was applied for aromatic hydrocarbons determination in petrol station waste waters.     

In-Loop Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with High Performance Liquid Chromatography

A new in-loop solid-phase microextraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography was developed for a fast and easy on line extraction, pre-concentration and LC analysis of moderately polar compounds from non-polar solvents. The inner surface of a long and small bore aluminum tube was electrochemically coated by Al₂O₃ and used as a new in-tube SPME device which can be also replaced to the injection loop in LC to achieve automated in-loop SPME-LC analysis. Large volume of n-hexane containing trace amounts of phenol and biphenyl was passed through the loop. The analytes were then desorbed by a small volume of methanol and introduced into chromatographic column. This technique was successfully used to analyses of different groups of moderately polar compounds. In this work, phenol and biphenyl were selected as the model compounds. Effect of various parameters affecting in-loop solid-phase microextraction and chromatographic procedure were investigated. Under the optimum conditions the calibration graph were linear in the range of 10–1000 ng mL^?1 and 50–1500 ng mL^?1 the detection limits were 2.5 and 8 ng mL^?1 for phenol and biphenyl, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) were < 2.4 and < 4.9% for phenol and biphenyl respectively. Concentration factor obtained for these compounds were more than 100 folds. The prepared SPME capillary tube (loop) is sturdy, inexpensive, and durable, and can be easily coupled with LC.     

Determination of haloanisoles in paper samples for food packaging by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography

A method was developed for the determination of trichloroanisole, tribromoanisole and pentachloroanisol by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography in paper samples (Kraft liner, Test liner and Miolo). Four commercial SPME fibers were evaluated: Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), Polyacrylate (PA), Carbowax/Divinylbenzene (CW/DVB) and Divinylbenzene/Carboxen/Polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS). DVB/CAR/PDMS gave the best results and was therefore selected. Other variables involved in the extraction procedure were studied and optimized, such as: sample volume, salting-out effect, temperature and extraction time, effect of organic solvent and previous sample preparation. Optimum conditions were obtained using 20 mL of sample with 5 mol L⁻¹ NaCl in a 40 mL vial, extraction temperature of 70 °C and sonication and extraction time of 30 and 40 min, respectively. Detection limits ranged from 0.43 to 1.32 ng g⁻¹ for all analytes. Recoveries between 70 and 100% were obtained and relative standard deviation was below 10% for all compounds.     

Characterization of volatile organic compounds and odors by in-vivo sampling of beef cattle rumen gas, by solid-phase microextraction, and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry–olfactometry

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and odors in cattle rumen gas have been characterized by in-vivo headspace sampling by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and analysis by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry–olfactometry (GC–MS–O). A novel device enabling headspace SPME (HS-SPME) sampling through a cannula was designed, refined, and used to collect rumen gas samples from steers. A Carboxen–polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fiber (85 μm) was used for SPME sampling. Fifty VOCs from ten chemical groups were identified in the rumen headspace. The VOCs identified had a wide range of molecular weight (MW) (34 to 184), boiling point (−63.3 to 292 °C), vapor pressure (1.05 × 10⁻⁵ to 1.17 × 10² Pa), and water solubility (0.66 to 1 × 10⁶ mg L⁻¹). Twenty-two of the compounds have a published odor detection thresholds (ODT) of less than 1 ppm. More than half of the compounds identified are reactive and have an estimated atmospheric lifetime of <24 h. The amounts of VFAs, sulfide compounds, phenolic compounds, and skatole, and the odor intensity of VFAs and sulfide compounds in the rumen gas were all higher after feeding than before feeding. These results indicate that rumen gases can be an important potential source of aerial emissions of reactive VOCs and odor. In-vivo sampling by SPME then GC–MS–O analysis can be a useful tool for qualitative characterization of rumen gases, digestion, and its relationship to odor and VOC formation. Figure Modified cannula for rumen gas sampling with SPME     

Determination of tebufenpyrad and oxadiazon by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Summary A method for determination of trace amounts of the pesticides tebufenpyrad and oxadiazon, previous solid-phase microextraction (SPME), was developed using gas chromatographymass spectrometry and selected ion monitoring (GC-MS; SIM). Both pesticides were extracted with a fused silica fiber coated with 100 μm polydimethylsiloxane. The effects of pH ionic strength, sample volume, extraction and desorption times as well as extraction temperature were studied. The linear concentration range of application was 0.5–250 ng mL⁻¹ for both compounds, with a detection limit of 0.06 ng mL⁻¹ for tebufenpyrad and 0.02 ng mL⁻¹ for oxadiazon. SPME-GC-MS analysis yielded good reproducibility (RSD between 7.5–10.1%). It was used to check the eventual existence of tebufenpyrad and oxadiazon above this limit in water and soil samples from Granada (Spain) as well as in human urine samples. The method validation was completed with spiked matrix samples. It can be applied as a monitoring tool for water, soil and urine in the investigation of environmental and occupational exposure to tebufenpyrad and oxadiazon.     

Determination of fluoroquinolones in environmental waters by in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

We developed a sensitive and useful method for the determination of five fluoroquinolones (FQs), enoxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and lomefloxacin in environmental waters, using a fully automated method consisting of in-tube solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). These compounds were analysed within 7 min by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a CAPCELL PAK C8 column and aqueous ammonium formate (pH 3.0, 5 mM)/acetonitrile (85/15, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Electrospray ionization conditions in the positive ion mode were optimized for MS/MS detection. In order to optimize the extraction of FQs, several in-tube SPME parameters were examined. The optimum in-tube SPME conditions were 20 draw/eject cycles of 40 μL of sample at a flow-rate of 150 μL/min, using a Carboxen 1010 PLOT capillary column as an extraction device. The extracted compounds were easily desorbed from the capillary by passage of the mobile phase. Using the in-tube SPME LC/MS/MS method, good linearity of the calibration curve (r ≥ 0.997) was obtained in the concentration range from 0.1 to 10 ng/mL for all compounds examined. The limits of detection (S/N = 3) of the five FQs ranged from 7 to 29 pg/mL. The in-tube SPME method showed 60-94-fold higher sensitivity than the direct injection method (5 μL injection). This method was applied successfully to the analysis of environmental water samples without any other pretreatment and interference peaks. Several surface waters and wastewaters were collected from the area around Asahi River, and ofloxacin was detected in wastewater samples of a sewage treatment plant and other two hospitals at 17.5-186.2 pg/mL. The recoveries of FQs spiked into river water were above 81% for a 0.1 or 0.2 ng/mL spiking concentration, and the relative standard deviations were below 1.9-8.6%.