Morphology,structure, and properties of in situ compatibilized linear low‐density polyethylene/polystyrene and linear low‐density polyethylene/high‐impact polystyrene blends

Blends of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) with polystyrene (PS) and blends of LLDPE with high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) were prepared through a reactive extrusion method. For increased compatibility of the two blending components, a Lewis acid catalyst, aluminum chloride (AlCl₃), was adopted to initiate the Friedel–Crafts alkylation reaction between the blending components. Spectra data from Raman spectra of the LLDPE/PS/AlCl₃ blends extracted with tetrahydrofuran verified that LLDPE segments were grafted to the para position of the benzene rings of PS, and this confirmed the graft structure of the Friedel–Crafts reaction between the polyolefin and PS. Because the in situ generated LLDPE‐g‐PS and LLDPE‐g‐HIPS copolymers acted as compatibilizers in the relative blending systems, the mechanical properties of the LLDPE/PS and LLDPE/HIPS blending systems were greatly improved. For example, after compatibilization, the Izod impact strength of an LLDPE/PS blend (80/20 w/w) was increased from 88.5 to 401.6 J/m, and its elongation at break increased from 370 to 790%. For an LLDPE/HIPS (60/40 w/w) blend, its Charpy impact strength was increased from 284.2 to 495.8 kJ/m². Scanning electron microscopy micrographs showed that the size of the domains decreased from 4–5 to less than 1 μm, depending on the content of added AlCl₃. The crystallization behavior of the LLDPE/PS blend was investigated with differential scanning calorimetry. Fractionated crystallization phenomena were noticed because of the reduction in the size of the LLDPE droplets. The melt‐flow rate of the blending system depended on the competition of the grafting reaction of LLDPE with PS and the degradation of the blending components. The degradation of PS only happened during the alkylation reaction between LLDPE and PS. Gel permeation chromatography showed that the alkylation reaction increased the molecular weight of the blend polymer. The low molecular weight part disappeared with reactive blending. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 1837–1849, 2003     

Block balance in hydrogenated polybutadiene‐b‐polymethylmethacrylate diblock copolymer for efficient interfacial activity in low‐density polyethylene/polymethylmethacrylate blend: Phase morphology development

The objective of the present study was to determine the best molecular balance between the two hydrogenated polybutadiene (HPB) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) blocks that promotes an HPB‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer with efficient compatibilization activity in a low‐density polyethylene (LDPE)/PMMA immiscible blend. The model blend selected, LDPE/PMMA, is “more immiscible” than the LDPE/polystyrene pair largely reported in open literature. The blends having a composition of 80LDPE/20PMMA exhibit a droplet‐in‐matrix phase morphology whereas in 20LDPE/80PMMA a co‐continuous phase morphology was developed. In the droplet‐in‐matrix phase morphology, the emulsifying efficiency of the copolymer was evaluated based on the maximum reduction of the PMMA droplet size it is able to promote. Whereas, in the co‐continuous phase morphology, the copolymer was evaluated based on its ability to stabilize the maximum phase co‐continuity. The sequences of the best emulsifying copolymer revealed are not symmetrical. An HPB‐b‐PMMA where the ratio of molar mass of the blocks, _HPB/ _PMMA, is within 1.8–1.95 exhibits a much better interfacial activity in LDPE/PMMA blends than a copolymer of much lower ratio (longer PMMA block). This is ascribed to the much higher interactions (cohesive energy density) encountered in PMMA (PMMA of the copolymer and PMMA phase of the blend) compared with the LDPE side (HPB of the copolymer and LDPE phase of the blend). © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 837–848, 2005     

Influence of the molecular architecture of low‐density polyethylene on the texture and mechanical properties of blown films

Three types of low‐density polyethylene materials were investigated with respect to the influence of the molecular architecture on the mechanical and use properties of blown films. The materials were a branched polyethylene synthesized by free‐radical polymerization under high‐pressure (HP‐LDPE), a linear ethylene–hexene copolymer (ZN‐LLDPE) produced by low‐pressure Ziegler–Natta catalysis, and an ethylene–hexene copolymer (M‐LLDPE) from metallocene catalysis. The extrusion and blowing conditions were identical for the three materials, with a take‐up ratio of 12 and a blow‐up ratio of 2.5. The blown films displayed a decreasing puncture resistance in the order M‐LLDPE, ZN‐LLDPE, and HP‐LDPE. In parallel, the tear resistance of the films became increasingly unbalanced in the same order of the polymers. The morphological study showed an increased anisotropy of the films in the same polymer order, the crystalline lamellae being increasingly oriented normal to the take‐up direction. This texturing caused a detrimental effect on the mechanical properties of the films, notably increasing the capacity for crack propagation. The phenomenon was ascribed to the kinetics of chain relaxation in the melt that governed the ability of the chains to recover an isotropic state from the flow‐induced stretching before crystallization. The puncture resistance was examined in terms of both texture and strain‐hardening capabilities. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 327–340, 2003     

Desorption behavior of a surfactant in a linear low‐density polyethylene blend at elevated temperatures

The desorption behavior of a surfactant in a linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) blend at elevated temperatures of 50, 70, and 80 °C was studied with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The composition of the LLDPE blend was 70:30 LLDPE/low‐density polyethylene. Three different specimens (II, III, and IV) were prepared with various compositions of a small molecular penetrant, sorbitan palmitate (SPAN‐40), and a migration controller, poly(ethylene acrylic acid) (EAA), in the LLDPE blend. The calculated diffusion coefficient (D) of SPAN‐40 in specimens II, III, and IV, between 50 and 80 °C, varied from 1.74 × 10^?11 to 6.79 × 10^?11 cm²/s, from 1.10 × 10^?11 to 5.75 × 10^?11 cm²/s, and from 0.58 × 10^?11 to 4.75 × 10^?11 cm²/s, respectively. In addition, the calculated activation energies (E_D) of specimens II, III, and IV, from the plotting of ln D versus 1/T between 50 and 80 °C, were 42.9, 52.7, and 65.6 kJ/mol, respectively. These values were different from those obtained between 25 and 50 °C and were believed to have been influenced by the interference of Tinuvin (a UV stabilizer) at elevated temperatures higher than 50 °C. Although the desorption rate of SPAN‐40 increased with the temperature and decreased with the EAA content, the observed spectral behavior did not depend on the temperature and time. For all specimens stored over 50 °C, the peak at 1739 cm^?1 decreased in a few days and subsequently increased with a peak shift toward 1730 cm^?1. This arose from the carbonyl stretching vibration of Tinuvin, possibly because of oxidation or degradation at elevated temperatures. In addition, the incorporation of EAA into the LLDPE blend suppressed the desorption rate of SPAN‐40 and retarded the appearance of the 1730 cm^?1 peak. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 1114–1126, 2004     

Stress–strain behavior of low‐density polyethylene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends with modulated interfaces with a hydrogenated polybutadiene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) diblock copolymer

The stress–strain diagrams and ultimate tensile properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized hydrogenated polybutadiene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (HPB‐b‐PMMA) blends with 20 wt % poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) droplets dispersed in a low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) matrix were studied. The HPB‐b‐PMMA pure diblock copolymer was prepared via controlled living anionic polymerization. Four copolymers, in terms of the molecular weights of the hydrogenated polybutadiene (HPB) and PMMA sequences (22,000–12,000, 63,300–31,700, 49,500–53,500, and 27,700–67,800), were used. We demonstrated with the stress–strain diagrams, in combination with scanning electron microscopy observations of deformed specimens, that the interfacial adhesion had a predominant role in determining the mechanism and extent of blend deformation. The debonding of PMMA particles from the LDPE matrix was clearly observed in the compatibilized blends in which the copolymer was not efficiently located at the interface. The best HPB‐b‐PMMA copolymer, resulting in the maximum improvement of the tensile properties of the compatibilized blend, had a PMMA sequence that was approximately half that of the HPB block. Because of the much higher interactions encountered in the PMMA phase in comparison with those in HPB (LDPE), a shorter sequence of PMMA (with respect to HPB but longer than the critical molecular weight for entanglement) was sufficient to favor a quantitative location of the copolymer at the LDPE/PMMA interface. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 22–34, 2005     

Electrically conductive,melt‐processed ternary blends of polyaniline/dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid,ethylene/vinyl acetate,and low‐density polyethylene

Although polyaniline (PANI) has high conductivity and relatively good environmental and thermal stability and is easily synthesized, the intractability of this intrinsically conducting polymer with a melting procedure prevents extensive applications. This work was designed to process PANI with a melting blend method with current thermoplastic polymers. PANI in an emeraldine base form was plasticized and doped with dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid (DBSA) to prepare a conductive complex (PANI–DBSA). PANI–DBSA, low‐density polyethylene (LDPE), and an ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) were blended in a twin‐rotor mixer. The blending procedure was monitored, including the changes in the temperature, torque moment, and work. As expected, the conductivity of ternary PANI–DBSA/LDPE/EVA was higher by one order of magnitude than that of binary PANI–DBSA/LDPE, and this was attributed to the PANI–DBSA phase being preferentially located in the EVA phase. An investigation of the morphology of the polymer blends with high‐resolution optical microscopy indicated that PANI–DBSA formed a conducting network at a high concentration of PANI–DBSA. The thermal and crystalline properties of the polymer blends were measured with differential scanning calorimetry. The mechanical properties were also measured. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 3750–3758, 2004     

Characterization of an unsaturated low‐density polyethylene

This study concerns a new group of low‐density polyethylenes (LDPEs)—unsaturated LDPE. The new LDPE is a copolymer between ethylene and 1,9‐decadiene and was polymerized in a commerical high‐pressure tubular reactor. The diene copolymerized with one double bond, leaving the other unreacted as a pendant side group. This yielded a copolymer containing a higher number of vinyl groups than ordinary LDPE. Fractionation of the copolymer and determination of the number of unsaturated structures in the different fractions by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that the diene is homogeneously incorporated along the molar‐mass distribution curve. It is also possible to obtain copolymers with a varying vinyl content, without drastic changes in molar mass or molar‐mass distribution, by a controlled addition of 1,9‐decadiene to the reactor. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 2974–2984, 2003     

Tear anisotropy in films blown from polyethylenes of different macromolecular architectures

Blown films of different types of polyethylenes, such as branched low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and linear high‐density polyethylene (HDPE), are well known to tear easily along particular directions: along the film bubble's transverse direction for LDPE and along the machine direction (MD) for HDPE. Depending on the resin characteristics and processing conditions, different structures can form within the film; it is therefore difficult to separate the effects of the crystal structure and orientation on the film tear behavior from the effects of the macromolecular architecture, such as the molecular weight distribution and long‐chain branching. Here we examine LDPE, HDPE, and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) blown films with similar crystal orientations, as verified by through‐film X‐ray scattering measurements. With these common orientations, LDPE and HDPE films still follow the usual preferred tear directions, whereas LLDPE tears isotropically despite an oriented crystal structure. These differences are attributed to the number densities of the tie molecules, especially along MD, which are considerably greater for linear‐architecture polymers with a substantial fraction of long chains, capable of significant extension in flow. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 413–420, 2005     

Melt grafting of N‐carbamyl maleamic acid onto linear low‐density polyethylene

The grafting of N‐carbamyl maleamic acid (NCMA) onto linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) was carried out with different concentrations of 2,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐di(tert‐butylperoxy) hexane (DBPH) as an initiator. The modification process was performed in the molten state with a Brabender mixer. All the materials were characterized with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and melt rheology. The analysis of the FTIR spectra indicated that the grafting efficiency increased with the concentration of both NCMA and DBPH. The calorimetric experiments showed that the modification process did not noticeably alter the enthalpy of fusion of LLDPE, whereas the melting temperature of the modified polymers was slightly lower than that corresponding to the original LLDPE. The rheological response of the molten polymers, determined under dynamic shear flow at small‐amplitude oscillations, indicated that the modification process induced crosslinking of the chains. Both the dynamic viscosity and elastic modulus of the modified LLDPE increased with the concentration of NCMA and DBPH, showing that larger molecules were generated during the modification process. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 3950–3958, 2002     

Effects of poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] on the charge distributions of low‐density polyethylene/polystyrene blends

The effect of the triblock copolymer poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS) on the formation of the space charge of immiscible low‐density polyethylene (LDPE)/polystyrene (PS) blends was investigated. Blends of 70/30 (wt %) LDPE/PS were prepared through melt blending in an internal mixer at a blend temperature of 220 °C. The amount of charge that accumulated in the 70% LDPE/30% PS blends decreased when the SEBS content increased up to 10 wt %. For compatibilized and uncompatibilized blends, no significant change in the degree of crystallinity of LDPE in the blends was observed, and so the effect of crystallization on the space charge distribution could be excluded. Morphological observations showed that the addition of SEBS resulted in a domain size reduction of the dispersed PS phase and better interfacial adhesion between the LDPE and PS phases. The location of SEBS at a domain interface enabled charges to migrate from one phase to the other via the domain interface and, therefore, resulted in a significant decrease in the amount of space charge for the LDPE/PS blends with SEBS. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 2813–2820, 2004     

Relationship between fracture toughness and intrinsic deformation parameters in isotropic and flow‐oriented linear low‐density polyethylene

The fracture toughness of isotropic and flow‐oriented linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) is evaluated by the Essential Work of Fracture (EWF) concept, with a special setup of CCD camera to monitor the process of deformation. Allowing for the molecular orientation, flow‐oriented sample, prepared via melt extrusion drawing, is stretched parallel (oriented‐0°) and perpendicular (oriented‐90°) to its original melt extrusion drawing direction, respectively. The obtained values of specific EFW w_e are 34.6, 10.2, and 4.2 N/mm for the oriented‐0°, isotropic and oriented‐90° sample, respectively. With knowledge of intrinsic deformation parameters deduced from uniaxial tensile tests, moreover, a relationship between specific EFW w_e the ratio of true yield stress to strain hardening modulus σ_ty/G is well established. It means that the fracture toughness of polyethylene is determined by both crystalline and amorphous parts, rather than by one of them. Moreover, the true yield stress seems to be nondecisive factors determining the fracture toughness of polyethylene. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 2880–2887, 2006     

Stabilization of a cocontinuous phase morphology by a tapered diblock or triblock copolymer in polystyrene‐rich low‐density polyethylene/polystyrene blends

The stability against the thermal annealing of a cocontinuous two‐phase morphology developed in polystyrene (PS)/low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) blends containing 80 wt % PS was investigated. Blends containing 1, 5, and 10 wt % of a tapered diblock poly(styrene‐block‐hydrogenated butadiene) (P(S‐b‐hB)) or triblock poly(styrene‐block‐hydrogenated butadiene‐block‐styrene) (P(S‐hB‐S)) copolymer were melt‐blended with roll‐mill mixing equipment. The efficiency of each of the two copolymers in stabilizing against coalescence the cocontinuous morphology was examined. The tensile properties of the resulting blends, annealed and nonannealed, were also examined in relation to the morphology induced by thermal annealing. The phase morphology was studied by optical and scanning electron microscopy. With computer‐aided image analysis, it was possible to obtain a measurable characteristic parameter to quantify the cocontinuous phase morphology. When it was necessary, the extraction of one phase with a selective solvent was performed. Although the observed differences were subtle, the tapered diblock exhibited a more efficient compatibilizing activity than the triblock copolymer, particularly at a low concentration of about 2 wt %. The superiority of the tapered diblock over the triblock might be due to its ability to quantitatively locate at the LDPE/PS interface and consequently form a more efficient barrier against the subsequent breakup of the elongated structures of the cocontinuous phase morphology. The tensile properties of the triblock‐modified blends were more sensitive to thermal annealing than the tapered‐modified ones. This deficiency was ascribed to the phase morphology coarsening of the dispersed polyethylene phase. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 202–216, 2003     

Linear low‐density polyethylene nanocomposites by in situ polymerization using a zirconium‐nickel tandem catalyst system

A series of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) nanocomposites containing different types of nanofiller (TiO₂, MWCNT, expanded graphite, and boehmite) were prepared by in situ polymerization using a tandem catalyst system composed of {Tp^Ms}NiCl ( 1 ) and Cp₂ZrCl₂ ( 2 ), and analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Based on these analyses, the filler content varied from 1.30 to 1.80 wt %. The melting temperatures and degree of crystallinity of the LLDPE nanocomposites were comparable to those of neat LLDPE. The presence of MWCNT as well as boehmite nucleated the LLDPE crystallization, as indicated by the increased crystallization temperature. The DMA results showed that the presence of TiO₂, EG, and CAM 9080 in the LLDPE matrix yielded nanocomposites with relatively inferior mechanical properties compared to neat LLDPE, suggesting heterogeneous distribution of these nanofillers into the polymer matrix and/or the formation of nanoparticle aggregates, which was confirmed by TEM. However, substantial improvement in the storage modulus was achieved by increasing the sonication time. The highest storage modulus was obtained using MWCNT (1.30 wt %). © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 3506–3512     

Mechanical properties of oriented low‐density polyethylene with an oriented lamellar‐stack morphology

A quantitative study was undertaken of the anisotropy of low‐strain mechanical behavior for specially oriented polyethylene with controlled crystalline and lamellar orientation. The samples were prepared by the die drawing of injection‐molded rods of polyethylene and annealing. This produced a parallel lamellar structure for which a simple, three‐dimensional composite laminate model could be used to calculate the expected anisotropy. Experimental data, including X‐ray strain measurements of the lateral crystalline elastic constants, showed good quantitative agreement with the model prediction. The X‐ray strain measurements confirmed that the amorphous regions exert large constraints on the crystalline phase in the lateral directions, where an order of magnitude difference was found between the measured apparent lateral crystalline compliances in the lamellar‐stack sample and the expected values for a perfect crystal. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 755–764, 2000     

Compatibilizing effect of isocyanate functional group on polyethylene terephthalate/low density polyethylene blends

To evaluate the compatibilizing effects of isocyanate (NCO) functional group on the polyethylene terephthalate/low density polyethylene (PET/LDPE) blends, LDPE grafted with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-isophorone diisocyanate (LDPE-g-HI) was prepared and blended with PET. The chemical reaction occurred during the melt blending in the PET/LDPE-g-HI blends was confirmed by the result of IR spectra. In the light of the blend morphology, the dispersions of the PET/LDPE-g-HI blends were very fine over the PET/LDPE blends. DSC thermograms indicated that PET microdispersions produced by the slow cooling of the PET/LDPE-g-HI blends were largely amorphous, with low crystallinity, due to the chemical bonding. The tensile strengths of the PET/LDPE-g-HI blends were higher than those of the PET/LDPE blends having a poor adhesion. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36: 447–453, 1998     

Novel characterization of the crystalline segment distribution and its effect on the crystallization of branched polyethylene by differential scanning calorimetry

Based on a thermal segregation treatment, a novel semiquantitative method for the characterization of the crystalline segment distribution in branched polyethylene copolymers was established by the results of differential scanning calorimetry being treated with the Gibbs–Thomson equation. The method was used to describe the segment distribution of Ziegler–Natta‐catalyzed linear low‐density polyethylene (Z–N LLDPE), metallocene‐catalyzed linear low‐density polyethylene (m‐LLDPE), and a commercial linear low‐density polyethylene with a wide molecular weight distribution. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of Z–N LLDPE and m‐LLDPE were studied to assess the effect of different segment distributions. According to their molecular characteristics, the crystallization behaviors were analyzed. They indicated that the different segment distributions of the two polymers resulted in different crystallization processes, including the nucleation and growth of crystals under various crystallization conditions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 2107–2118, 2002     

Effects of different types of polyethylene on the morphology and properties of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene compatibilized blends

Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET) was blended with four types of polyethylene (PE), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE; LL0209AA, Fs150), low density polyethylene (LDPE; F101‐1), and metallocene‐LLDPE (m‐LLDPE; Fv203) by co‐rotating twin‐screw extruder. Maleic anhydride‐grafted poly(styrene‐ethylene/butyldiene‐styrene) (SEBS‐g‐MA) was added as compatibilizer. R‐PET/PE/SEBS‐g‐MA blends were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and mechanical property testing. The results indicated that the morphology and properties of the blends depended to a great extent on the miscibility between the olefin segments of SEBS‐g‐MA and PE. Due to the proper interaction between SEBS‐g‐MA and LDPE (F101‐1), most SEBS‐g‐MA, located at the interface between two phases of PET and LDPE to increase the interfacial adhesion, lead to better mechanical properties of R‐PET/LDPE (F101‐1) blend. However, both the poor miscibility of SEBS‐g‐MA with LLDPE (LL0209AA) and the excessive miscibility of SEBS‐g‐MA with LLDPE (Fs150) and m‐LLDPE (Fv203) reduced the compatibilization effect of SEBS‐g‐MA. DSC results showed that the interaction between SEBS‐g‐MA and PE obviously affected the crystallization of PET and PE. DMA results indicated that PE had more influence on the movement of SEBS‐g‐MA than PE did. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Gas transport in surface‐modified low‐density polyethylene films with acrylic acid as a grafting agent

The modification of polyethylene by the grafting of poly(acrylic acid) onto the surface of one of the faces of low‐density polyethylene films with UV radiation is reported. The transport of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, ethane, ethylene, propane, and argon across surface‐modified films containing 3.7% poly(acrylic acid) has been investigated at several temperatures. The layer of poly(acrylic acid) grafted onto the surface of one of the faces of the films reduces the permeability coefficient of the gases by a factor of about 1/6. The sharp drop in the gas permeability as a result of the poly(acrylic acid) layer may arise either from the formation of ordered structures of the grafted chains or from the development of highly crosslinked structures. The values of the polymer–gas enthalpic interaction parameter for the modified film are higher than those for the unmodified one. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 2828–2840, 2006     

Solid-state relaxations in linear low-density (1-octene comonomer), low-density,and high-density polyethylene blends

Extensive thermal and relaxational behavior in the blends of linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) (1-octene comonomer) with low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) have been investigated to elucidate miscibility and molecular relaxations in the crystalline and amorphous phases by using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and a dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer (DMTA). In the LLDPE/LDPE blends, two distinct endotherms during melting and crystallization by DSC were observed supporting the belief that LLDPE and LDPE exclude one another during crystallization. However, the dynamic mechanical β and γ relaxations of the blends indicate that the two constituents are miscible in the amorphous phase, while LLDPE dominates α relaxation. In the LLDPE/HDPE system, there was a single composition-dependent peak during melting and crystallization, and the heat of fusion varied linearly with composition supporting the incorporation of HDPE into the LLDPE crystals. The dynamic mechanical α, β, and γ relaxations of the blends display an intermediate behavior that indicates miscibility in both the crystalline and amorphous phases. In the LDPE/HDPE blend, the melting or crystallization peaks of LDPE were strongly influenced by HDPE. The behavior of the α relaxation was dominated by HDPE, while those of β and γ relaxations were intermediate of the constituents, which were similar to those of the LLDPE/HDPE blends. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 35 : 1633–1642, 1997     

Morphology and electrical breakdown properties of LDPE‐polypropylene copolymer blends

In this study, the specimens of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and blend polymers of LDPE and a random copolymer of ethylene and propylene were prepared by the blowing process and T‐die method. The differences in electrical breakdown properties and morphology between the specimens made by the two different methods were studied. It was found that the specimen made by the T‐die method had a higher electrical breakdown strength than the specimen made by the blowing process, except for the DC breakdown strength in some cases at 30 °C. The morphology of the specimens was investigated by means of the measurements of thermal shrinkage, infrared dichroism, and X‐ray diffraction. The specimen made by the T‐die method has a stronger orientation in both the crystalline and amorphous phases than the specimen made by the blowing process. The difference in morphology is supposed to be correlated with the difference in electrical breakdown properties between the specimens made by the two different methods. It was concluded that the electrical breakdown properties are strongly affected by the orientation of chains in the specimen. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 39: 1741–1748, 2001