Uppers to Zero in Polynomial Rings and Prüfer-Like Domains

Let D be an integral domain and X an indeterminate over D. It is well known that (a) D is quasi-Prüfer (i.e., its integral closure is a Prüfer domain) if and only if each upper to zero Q in D[X] contains a polynomial g ∈ D[X] with content c _D (g) = D; (b) an upper to zero Q in D[X] is a maximal t-ideal if and only if Q contains a nonzero polynomial g ∈ D[X] with c _D (g) ^v  = D. Using these facts, the notions of UMt-domain (i.e., an integral domain such that each upper to zero is a maximal t-ideal) and quasi-Prüfer domain can be naturally extended to the semistar operation setting and studied in a unified frame. In this article, given a semistar operation ☆ in the sense of Okabe–Matsuda, we introduce the ☆-quasi-Prüfer domains. We give several characterizations of these domains and we investigate their relations with the UMt-domains and the Prüfer v-multiplication domains.     

The n-generator property in rings of integer-valued polynomials determined by finite sets

Let D be an integral domain and E a non-empty finite subset of D. For n ≧ 2, we show that D has the n-generator property if and only if Int(E, D) has the n-generator property if and only if Int(E, D) has the strong (n + 1)-generator property. Thus, iterating the Int(E, D) construction cannot produce Prüfer domains whose finitely generated ideals require an ever larger number of generators. We also show that, for n ≧ 2, a non-zero polynomial f ∈Int(E, D) is a strong n-generator in Int(E, D) if and only if f (a) is a strong n-generator in D for all a ∈E. Received: 15 July 2004     

Integrally Closed Domains,Minimal Polynomials,and Null Ideals of Matrices

Abstract

We show that every element of the integral closure D′ of a domain D occurs as a coefficient of the minimal polynomial of a matrix with entries in D. This answers affirmatively a question of Brewer and Richman, namely, if integrally closed domains are characterized by the property that the minimal polynomial of every square matrix with entries in D is in D[x]. It follows that a domain D is integrally closed if and only if for every matrix A with entries in D the null ideal of A, N _D (A)?=?{f?∈?D[x]?∣?f(A)?=?0} is a principal ideal of D[x].     

Decomposition and removability properties of John domains

In this paper we characterize John domains in terms of John domain decomposition property. In addition, we also show that a domain D in ℔ ⁿ is a John domain if and only if D\P is a John domain, where P is a subset of D containing finitely many points of D. The best possibility and an application of the second result are also discussed.     

Integer-Valued Polynomial Rings,t-Closure,and Associated Primes

Given an integral domain D with quotient field K, the ring of integer-valued polynomials on D is the subring {f(X) ∈ K[X]: f(D) ? D} of the polynomial ring K[X]. Using the tools of t-closure and associated primes, we generalize some known results on integer-valued polynomial rings over Krull domains, Prüfer v-multiplication domains, and Mori domains.     

Factorization in dedekind domains with finite class group

LetD be a Dedekind domain. It is well known thatD is then an atomic integral domain (that is to say, a domain in which each nonzero nonunit has a factorization as a product of irreducible elements). We study factorization properties of elements in Dedekind domains with finite class group. IfD has the property that any factorization of an elementα into irreducibles has the same length, thenD is called a half factorial domain (HFD, see [41]). IfD has the property that any factorization of an elementα into irreducibles has the same length modulor (for somer>1), thenD is called a congruence half factorial domain of orderr. In Section I we consider some general factorization properties of atomic integral domains as well as the interrelationship of the HFD and CHFD property in the Dedekind setting. In Section II we extend many of the results of [41], [42] and [36] concerning HFDs when the class group ofD is cyclic. Finally, in Section III we consider the CHFD property in detail and determine some basic properties of Dedekind CHFDs. IfG is any Abelian group andS any subset ofG−[0], then {G, S} is called a realizable pair if there exists a Dedekind domainD with class groupG such thatS is the set of nonprincipal classes ofG which contain prime ideals. We prove that for a finite abelian groupG there exists a realizable pair {G, S} such that any Dedekind domain associated to {G, S} is CHFD for somer>1 but not HFD if and only ifG is not isomorphic toZ ₂,Z ₂,Z ₂ ⊕Z ₂, orZ ₃ ⊕Z ₃. The first author received support under the John M. Bennett Fellowship at Trinity University and also gratefully acknowledges the support of The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.     

Gaussian Polynomials and Content Ideal in Pullbacks

This article deals mainly with rings (with zerodivisors) in which regular Gaussian polynomials have locally principal contents. Precisely, we show that if (T,M) is a local ring which is not a field, D is a subring of T/M such that qf(D) = T/M, h: T → T/M is the canonical surjection and R = h ^?1(D), then if T satisfies the property “every regular Gaussian polynomial has locally principal content,” then also R verifies the same property. We also show that if D is a Prüfer domain and T satisfies the property “every Gaussian polynomial has locally principal content”, then R satisfies the same property. The article includes a brief discussion of the scopes and limits of our result.     

Module-Theoretic Characterizations of Generalized GCD Domains

We give several module-theoretic characterizations of generalized GCD domains. For example, we show that an integral domain R is a generalized GCD domain if and only if semi-divisoriality and flatness are equivalent for torsion-free R-modules if and only if every w-finite w-module is projective if and only if R is w-Prüfer (in the sense of Zafrullah). We also characterize when a pullback R of a certain type is a generalized GCD domain. As an application, we characterize when R = D + XE[X] (here, D ? E is an extension of domains and X is an indeterminate) is a generalized GCD domain.     

Universally Catenarian Integral Domains,Strong S-Domains and Semistar Operations

Let D be an integral domain and a semistar operation stable and of finite type on it. In this article, we are concerned with the study of the semistar (Krull) dimension theory of polynomial rings over D. We introduce and investigate the notions of -universally catenarian and -stably strong S-domains and prove that, every -locally finite dimensional Prüfer -multiplication domain is -universally catenarian, and this implies -stably strong S-domain. We also give new characterizations of -quasi-Prüfer domains introduced recently by Chang and Fontana, in terms of these notions.     

Crossed products and blocks with normal defect groups

Abstract

Let D be an integral domain. A multiplicative set S of D is an almost splitting set if for each 0 ≠ d ∈ D, there exists an n = n(d) with d ⁿ  = st where s ∈ S and t is v-coprime to each element of S. An integral domain D is an almost GCD (AGCD) domain if for every x, y ∈ D, there exists a positive integer n = n(x, y) such that x ⁿ D ∩ y ⁿ D is a principal ideal. We prove that the polynomial ring D[X] is an AGCD domain if and only if D is an AGCD domain and D[X] ? D′[X] is a root extension, where D′ is the integral closure of D. We also show that D + XD _S [X] is an AGCD domain if and only if D and D _S [X] are AGCD domains and S is an almost splitting set.     

Radically perfect prime ideals in polynomial rings

We call an ideal I of a commutative ring R radically perfect if among the ideals of R whose radical is equal to the radical of I the one with the least number of generators has this number of generators equal to the height of I. Let R be a Noetherian integral domain of Krull dimension one containing a field of characteristic zero. Then each prime ideal of the polynomial ring R[X] is radically perfect if and only if R is a Dedekind domain with torsion ideal class group. We also show that over a finite dimensional Bézout domain R, the polynomial ring R[X] has the property that each prime ideal of it is radically perfect if and only if R is of dimension one and each prime ideal of R is the radical of a principal ideal.     

PrÜfer-Like Domains and the Nagata Ring of Integral Domains

A subring A of a Prüfer domain B is a globalized pseudo-valuation domain (GPVD) if (i) A?B is a unibranched extension and (ii) there exists a nonzero radical ideal I, common to A and B such that each prime ideal of A (resp., B) containing I is maximal in A (resp., B). Let D be an integral domain, X be an indeterminate over D, c(f) be the ideal of D generated by the coefficients of a polynomial f ∈ D[X], N = {f ∈ D[X] | c(f) = D}, and N _v  = {f ∈ D[X] | c(f)^?1 = D}. In this article, we study when the Nagata ring D[X] _N (more generally, D[X] _{N v} ) is a GPVD. To do this, we first use the so-called t-operation to introduce the notion of t-globalized pseudo-valuation domains (t-GPVDs). We then prove that D[X] _{N v} is a GPVD if and only if D is a t-GPVD and D[X] _{N v} has Prüfer integral closure, if and only if D[X] is a t-GPVD, if and only if each overring of D[X] _{N v} is a GPVD. As a corollary, we have that D[X] _N is a GPVD if and only if D is a GPVD and D has Prüfer integral closure. We also give several examples of integral domains D such that D[X] _{N v} is a GPVD.     

A going-up theorem for arbitrary chains of prime ideals

We prove that if an extension R ? T of commutative rings satisfies the going-up property (for instance, if T is an integral extension of R), then any increasing chain of prime ideals of R (indexed by an arbitrary linearly ordered set) is covered by some corresponding chain of prime ideals of T. As a corollary, we recover the recent result of Kang and Oh that any such chain of prime ideals of an integral domain D is covered by a corresponding chain in some valuation overring of D.     

Domains whose overrings satisfy accp

An integral domain D satisfies ACC on principal ideals (ACJCP) if there does not exist an infinite strictly ascending chain of principal ideals of D. Any Noetherian domain, in particular any Dedekind domain, satisfies ACCP. In this note we prove the following theorem: Let D be an integral domain. Then the integral closure of D is a Dedekind domain if and only if every overring of D (ring between D and its quotient field) satisfies ACCP.     

Semistar-Krull and valuative dimension of integral domains

Given a stable semistar operation of finite type ⋆ on an integral domain D, we show that it is possible to define in a canonical way a stable semistar operation of finite type ⋆[X] on the polynomial ring D[X], such that, if n := ⋆-dim(D), then n+1 ≤ ⋆[X]-dim(D[X]) ≤ 2n+1. We also establish that if D is a ⋆-Noetherian domain or is a Prüfer ⋆-multiplication domain, then ⋆[X]-dim(D[X]) = ⋆- dim(D)+1. Moreover we define the semistar valuative dimension of the domain D, denoted by ⋆-dim _v (D), to be the maximal rank of the ⋆-valuation overrings of D. We show that ⋆-dim _v (D) = n if and only if ⋆[X ₁, . . . , X _n ]-dim(D[X ₁, . . . , X _n ]) = 2n, and that if ⋆-dim _v (D) < ∞ then ⋆[X]-dim _v (D[X]) = ⋆-dim _v (D) + 1. In general ⋆-dim(D) ≤ ⋆-dim _v (D) and equality holds if D is a ⋆-Noetherian domain or is a Prüfer ⋆-multiplication domain. We define the ⋆-Jaffard domains as domains D such that ⋆-dim(D) < ∞ and ⋆-dim(D) = ⋆-dim _v (D). As an application, ⋆-quasi-Prüfer domains are characterized as domains D such that each (⋆, ⋆′)-linked overring T of D, is a ⋆′-Jaffard domain, where ⋆′ is a stable semistar operation of finite type on T. As a consequence of this result we obtain that a Krull domain D, must be a w _D -Jaffard domain.     

Umt-domains and domains with prüfer integral closure

An integral domain R is said to be a UMT-domain if uppers to zero in R[X) are maximal t-ideals. We show that R is a UMT-domain if and only if its localizations at maximal tdeals have Prüfer integral closure. We also prove that the UMT-property is preserved upon passage to polynomial rings. Finally, we characterize the UMT-property in certian pullback constructions; as an application, we show that a domain has Prüfer integral closure if and only if all its overrings are UMT-domains.     

Pullbacks of Arithmetical Rings

We give necessary and sufficient conditions that the pullback of a conductor square be a chain ring (i.e., a ring whose ideals are totally ordered by inclusion). We also give necessary and sufficient conditions that the pullback of a conductor square be an arithmetical ring (i.e., a ring which is locally a chain ring at every maximal ideal). For any integral domain D with field of fractions K, we characterize all Prüfer domains R between D[X] and K[X] such that the conductor C of K[X] into R is nonzero. As an application, we show that for n ≥ 2, such a ring R has the n-generator property (every finitely generated ideal can be generated by n elements) if and only if R/C has the same property.     

Note on non-D-rings

Abstract

Recall that an integral domain R is said to be a non-D-ring if there exists a non-constant polynomial f (X) in R[X] (called a uv-polynomial) such that f (a) is a unit of R for every a in R. In this note we generalize this notion to commutative rings (that are not necessarily integral domains) as follows: for a positive integer n, we say that R is an n-non-D-ring if there exists a polynomial f of degree n in R[X] such that f (a) is a unit of R for every a in R. We then investigate the properties of this notion in di?erent contexts of commutative rings.     

SOME t-CLOSED PAIRS

Let A ? B be integral domains. (A, B) is called a t-closed pair if each subring of B containing A is t-closed. Let R be a t-closed domain containing a field K and let I be a nonzero proper ideal of R. Let D be a subring of K and let S = D + I. If D is a field then it is shown that (S, R) is a t-closed pair if and only if R is integral over S and I is a maximal ideal of R. If D is not a field then we prove in this note that (S, R) is a t-closed pair if and only if (D, K) is a t-closed pair and R = K + I.     

Isonoetherian power series rings

Facchini and Nazemian proved that a valuation domain is isonoetherian if and only if it is discrete of Krull dimension ≤2 and they showed that this cannot be generalized from the local case to the global case: the 2-dimensional generalized Dedekind domain ?+X?[[X]] is not isonoetherian. Let D be an integral domain with quotient field K. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions on D and K, so that the ring D+XK[[X]] is isonoetherian. We deduce that if D is integrally closed, then D+XK[[X]] is isonoetherian if and only if D is a semi-local principal ideal domain.