Tableau method for residuated logic

Residuated logic is a generalization of intuitionistic logic, which does not assume the idempotence of the conjunction operator. Such generalized conjunction operators have proved important in expert systems (in the area of Approximate Reasoning) and in some areas of Theoretical Computer Science. Here we generalize the intuitionistic tableau procedure and prove that this generalized tableau method is sound for the semantics (the class of residuated algebras) of residuated propositional calculus (RPC). Since the axioms of RPC are complete for the semantics we may conclude that whenever a formula 0 is tableau provable, it is deducible in RPC. We present two different approaches for constructing residuated algebras which give us countermodels for some formulas φ which are not tableau provable. The first uses the fact that the theory of residuated algebras is equational, to construct quotients of free algebras. The second uses finite algebras. We end by discussing a number of open questions.     

Uniform interpolation and the existence of sequent calculi

This paper presents a uniform and modular method to prove uniform interpolation for several intermediate and intuitionistic modal logics. The proof-theoretic method uses sequent calculi that are extensions of the terminating sequent calculus $\mathsf{G4ip}$ for intuitionistic propositional logic. It is shown that whenever the rules in a calculus satisfy certain structural properties, the corresponding logic has uniform interpolation. It follows that the intuitionistic versions of $\mathsf{K}$ and $\mathsf{KD}$ (without the diamond operator) have uniform interpolation. It also follows that no intermediate or intuitionistic modal logic without uniform interpolation has a sequent calculus satisfying those structural properties, thereby establishing that except for the seven intermediate logics that have uniform interpolation, no intermediate logic has such a sequent calculus.     

Hilbert's ϵ-operator in intuitionistic type theories

We investigate Hilbert's ?-calculus in the context of intuitionistic type theories, that is, within certain systems of intuitionistic higher-order logic. We determine the additional deductive strength conferred on an intuitionistic type theory by the adjunction of closed ?-terms. We extend the usual topos semantics for type theories to the ?-operator and prove a completeness theorem. The paper also contains a discussion of the concept of “partially defined” ?-term. MSC: 03B15, 03B20, 03G30.     

Sequent calculi for propositional star-free likelihood logic

We consider classical, multisuccedent intuitionistic, and intuitionistic sequent calculi for propositional likelihood logic. We prove the admissibility of structural rules and cut rule, invertibility of rules, correctness of the calculi, and completeness of the classical calculus with respect to given semantics.__________Published in Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 3–21, January–March, 2005.     

Imperative programs as proofs via game semantics

Game semantics extends the Curry–Howard isomorphism to a three-way correspondence: proofs, programs, strategies. But the universe of strategies goes beyond intuitionistic logics and lambda calculus, to capture stateful programs. In this paper we describe a logical counterpart to this extension, in which proofs denote such strategies. The system is expressive: it contains all of the connectives of Intuitionistic Linear Logic, and first-order quantification. Use of Laird?s sequoid operator allows proofs with imperative behaviour to be expressed. Thus, we can embed first-order Intuitionistic Linear Logic into this system, Polarized Linear Logic, and an imperative total programming language.     

New operations in intuitionistic calculus

The question is studied of the possibility of extending the intuitionistic propositional calculus by adding single-valued one-place operations which are not expressible in terms of conjunction, disjunction, implication, or negation. There is constructed a system of correct calculi with new single-valued operations which is isomorphic to the family of proper extensions of the intuitionistic propositional calculus.Translated from Matematicheskie Zametki, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 23–28, July, 1977.The author wishes to thank L. L. Maksimova for his help with this paper.     

The Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski embedding for infinitary intuitionistic logic and its extensions

The Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski embedding allows to view intuitionistic logic through the lenses of modal logic. In this work, an extension of the modal embedding to infinitary intuitionistic logic is introduced. First, a neighborhood semantics for a family of axiomatically presented infinitary modal logics is given and soundness and completeness are proved via the method of canonical models. The semantics is then exploited to obtain a labelled sequent calculus with good structural properties. Next, soundness and faithfulness of the embedding are established by transfinite induction on the height of derivations: the proof is obtained directly without resorting to non-constructive principles. Finally, the modal embedding is employed in order to relate classical, intuitionistic and modal derivability in infinitary logic extended with axioms.     

A semantic hierarchy for intuitionistic logic

Brouwer’s views on the foundations of mathematics have inspired the study of intuitionistic logic, including the study of the intuitionistic propositional calculus and its extensions. The theory of these systems has become an independent branch of logic with connections to lattice theory, topology, modal logic, and other areas. This paper aims to present a modern account of semantics for intuitionistic propositional systems. The guiding idea is that of a hierarchy of semantics, organized by increasing generality: from the least general Kripke semantics on through Beth semantics, topological semantics, Dragalin semantics, and finally to the most general algebraic semantics. While the Kripke, topological, and algebraic semantics have been extensively studied, the Beth and Dragalin semantics have received less attention. We bring Beth and Dragalin semantics to the fore, relating them to the concept of a nucleus from pointfree topology, which provides a unifying perspective on the semantic hierarchy.     

Proof analysis in intermediate logics

Using labelled formulae, a cut-free sequent calculus for intuitionistic propositional logic is presented, together with an easy cut-admissibility proof; both extend to cover, in a uniform fashion, all intermediate logics characterised by frames satisfying conditions expressible by one or more geometric implications. Each of these logics is embedded by the G?del–McKinsey–Tarski translation into an extension of S4. Faithfulness of the embedding is proved in a simple and general way by constructive proof-theoretic methods, without appeal to semantics other than in the explanation of the rules.     

A secondary semantics for Second Order Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

In this paper we propose a Kripke‐style semantics for second order intuitionistic propositional logic and we provide a semantical proof of the disjunction and the explicit definability property. Moreover, we provide a tableau calculus which is sound and complete with respect to such a semantics. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

A proof-search procedure for intuitionistic propositional logic

A sequent root-first proof-search procedure for intuitionistic propositional logic is presented. The procedure is obtained from modified intuitionistic multi-succedent and classical sequent calculi, making use of Glivenko’s Theorem. We prove that a sequent is derivable in a standard intuitionistic multi-succedent calculus if and only if the corresponding prefixed-sequent is derivable in the procedure.     

A hybrid calculus for logic <Emphasis Type="Italic">N</Emphasis><Superscript><Emphasis Type="Italic">*</Emphasis></Superscript>: residual finiteness and decidability

It is proved that logic N ^* is residually finite and decidable. A hybrid calculus for the logic is constructed based on a tabular calculus for intuitionistic logic. It is shown that the hybrid calculus is sound and complete.     

An intuitionistic formula hierarchy based on high‐school identities

We revisit the notion of intuitionistic equivalence and formal proof representations by adopting the view of formulas as exponential polynomials. After observing that most of the invertible proof rules of intuitionistic (minimal) propositional sequent calculi are formula (i.e., sequent) isomorphisms corresponding to the high‐school identities, we show that one can obtain a more compact variant of a proof system, consisting of non‐invertible proof rules only, and where the invertible proof rules have been replaced by a formula normalization procedure. Moreover, for certain proof systems such as the G4ip sequent calculus of Vorob'ev, Hudelmaier, and Dyckhoff, it is even possible to see all of the non‐invertible proof rules as strict inequalities between exponential polynomials; a careful combinatorial treatment is given in order to establish this fact. Finally, we extend the exponential polynomial analogy to the first‐order quantifiers, showing that it gives rise to an intuitionistic hierarchy of formulas, resembling the classical arithmetical hierarchy, and the first one that classifies formulas while preserving isomorphism.     

Distributive-Lattice Semantics of Sequent Calculi with Structural Rules

The goal of the paper is to develop a universal semantic approach to derivable rules of propositional multiple-conclusion sequent calculi with structural rules, which explicitly involve not only atomic formulas, treated as metavariables for formulas, but also formula set variables (viz., metavariables for finite sets of formulas), upon the basis of the conception of model introduced in (Fuzzy Sets Syst 121(3):27–37, 2001). One of the main results of the paper is that any regular sequent calculus with structural rules has such class of sequent models (called its semantics) that a rule is derivable in the calculus iff it is sound with respect to each model of the semantics. We then show how semantics of admissible rules of such calculi can be found with using a method of free models. Next, our universal approach is applied to sequent calculi for many-valued logics with equality determinant. Finally, we exemplify this application by studying sequent calculi for some of such logics.      

A focused approach to combining logics

We present a compact sequent calculus LKU for classical logic organized around the concept of polarization. Focused sequent calculi for classical, intuitionistic, and multiplicative-additive linear logics are derived as fragments of the host system by varying the sensitivity of specialized structural rules to polarity information. We identify a general set of criteria under which cut-elimination holds in such fragments. From cut-elimination we derive a unified proof of the completeness of focusing. Furthermore, each sublogic can interact with other fragments through cut. We examine certain circumstances, for example, in which a classical lemma can be used in an intuitionistic proof while preserving intuitionistic provability. We also examine the possibility of defining classical-linear hybrid logics.     

Multi-attribute decision making based on a novel IF point operator

Intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) point operators transform an intuitionistic fuzzy set to a fuzzy set, or an intuitionistic fuzzy set with a smaller degree of hesitance. The purpose of which is to empower the operations of intuitionistic fuzzy sets with traditional fuzzy set methodologies. In the present paper, a new IF point operator is proposed. Different from the existing IF point operators, the new approach includes two parametric functions with respect to the number of iterations. It is proved that the newly proposed method could be degenerated to the traditional IF point operators. Meanwhile, the new IF point operator can extend our horizons in the exploration of the relationship between fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Specifically, a special case of the new IF point operator would be entitled as the memoryless multi-stage voting method, with which the decision makers are assumed to be affected only by the outcomes of the latest round of voting. It is proved that the memoryless multi-stage voting method converges to the limit produced by the infinite number of iterations much faster than the traditional voting method. Furthermore, a numerical example is employed to demonstrate the validity and performance of the memoryless multi-stage voting approach.     

Reasoning about proof and knowledge

In previous work [15], we presented a hierarchy of classical modal systems, along with algebraic semantics, for the reasoning about intuitionistic truth, belief and knowledge. Deviating from Gödel's interpretation of IPC in S4, our modal systems contain IPC in the way established in [13]. The modal operator can be viewed as a predicate for intuitionistic truth, i.e. proof. Epistemic principles are partially adopted from Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic IEL [4]. In the present paper, we show that the S5-style systems of our hierarchy correspond to an extended Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation and are complete w.r.t. a relational semantics based on intuitionistic general frames. In this sense, our S5-style logics are adequate and complete systems for the reasoning about proof combined with belief or knowledge. The proposed relational semantics is a uniform framework in which also IEL can be modeled. Verification-based intuitionistic knowledge formalized in IEL turns out to be a special case of the kind of knowledge described by our S5-style systems.     

A constructive investigation of satisfiability

We present a constructive analysis of the logical notions of satisfiability and consistency for first-order intuitionistic formulae. In particular, we use formal topology theory to provide a positive semantics for satisfiability. Then we propose a “co-inductive” logical calculus, which captures the positive content of consistency.     

The Fueter mapping theorem in integral form and the ℱ‐functional calculus

In this paper we show a version of the Fueter mapping theorem that can be stated in integral form based on the Cauchy formulas for slice monogenic (or slice regular) functions. More precisely, given a holomorphic function f of a paravector variable, we generate a monogenic function by an integral transform whose kernel is particularly simple. This procedure allows us to define a functional calculus for n‐tuples of commuting operators (called ?‐functional calculus) based on a new notion of spectrum, called ?‐spectrum, for the n‐tuples of operators. Analogous results are shown for the quaternionic version of the theory and for the related ?‐functional calculus. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.