An Electron‐Deficient Porphyrin Tape

Hexakis(pentafluorophenyl)‐substituted meso–meso‐linked Zn^II–diporphyrin ( 9 ), which was prepared by the acid‐catalyzed cross‐condensation of 1,1,2,2‐tetrapyrroethane ( 5 ) with dipyrromethane dicarbinol ( 6 ), was converted into meso–meso,β‐β,β‐β triply linked Zn^II–diporphyrin 3 by oxidation with 2,3‐dichloro‐5,6‐dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ) and Sc(OTf)₃. Beside the red‐shifted absorption spectrum and split first oxidation potential that are common to the triply‐linked Zn^II–diporphyrins, diporphyrin 3 exhibited considerably improved chemical stability owing to a lowered HOMO and good solubility in common organic solvents. The two‐photon absorption (TPA) cross‐section and S₁‐state lifetime of compound 3 were 1700 GM and 3.3 ps, respectively.     

Direct Amination of meso‐Tetraarylporphyrin Derivatives – Easy Route to A3B‐, A2BC‐, and A2B2‐Type Porphyrins Bearing Two Nitrogen‐Containing Substituents at the meso‐Positioned Phenyl Groups

meso‐Tetraarylporphyrinato complexes 1a – g (Zn^II, Cu^II, and Ni^II) bearing one or two nitro‐substituted aryl moieties react with 1,1,1‐trimethylhydrazinium iodide in the presence of ^tBuOK in THF at 0–5° or in the presence of KOH in DMSO at 60–70° according to a nucleophilic substitution of an H‐atom, thus affording porphyrins 2a – g and 3f , g with amino‐functionalized meso‐positioned aryl substituents in yields up to 73% (Scheme 1 and Table). The products obtained are attractive intermediates for further derivatization of porphyrins and may be of potential use as sensitizers in photodynamic cancer therapy.     

Large Porphyrin Squares from the Self‐Assembly of meso‐Triazole‐Appended L‐Shaped meso–meso‐Linked ZnII–Triporphyrins: Synthesis and Efficient Energy Transfer

meso‐Triazolyl‐appended Zn^II–porphyrins were readily prepared by Cu^I‐catalyzed 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition of benzyl azide to meso‐ethynylated Zn^II–porphyrin (click chemistry). In noncoordinating CHCl₃ solvent, spontaneous assembly occurred to form tetrameric array ( 3 )₂ from meso–meso‐linked diporphyrins 3 , and dodecameric porphyrin squares ( 4 )₄ and ( 5 )₄ from the L ‐shaped meso–meso‐linked triporphyrins 4 and 5 . The structures of these assemblies were examined by ¹H NMR spectra, absorption spectra, and their gel permeation chromatography (GPC) retention time. Furthermore, the structures of the dodecameric porphyrin squares ( 4 )₄ and ( 5 )₄ were probed by small‐ and wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS/WAXS) measurements in solution using a synchrotron source. Excitation‐energy migration processes in these assemblies were also investigated in detail by using both steady‐state and time‐resolved spectroscopic methods, which revealed efficient excited‐energy transfer (EET) between the meso–meso‐linked Zn^II–porphyrin units that occurred with time constants of 1.5 ps^?1 for ( 3 )₂ and 8.8 ps^?1 for ( 5 )₄.     

Probing the Rotational Dynamics of meso‐(2‐Substituted)aryl Substituents in A2B‐Type Subporphyrins

A₂B‐type B‐methoxy subporphyrins 3 a – g and B‐phenyl subporphyrins 7 a – c , e , g bearing meso‐(2‐substituted)aryl substituents are synthesized, and their rotational dynamics are examined through variable‐temperature (VT) ¹H NMR spectroscopy. In these subporphyrins, the rotation of meso‐aryl substituents is hindered by a rationally installed 2‐substituent. The rotational barriers determined are considerably smaller than those reported previously for porphyrins. Comparison of the rotation activation parameters reveals a variable contribution of ΔH^≠ and ΔS^≠ in ΔG^≠. 2‐Methyl and 2‐ethyl groups of the meso‐aryl substituents in subporphyrins 3 e , 3 f , and 7 e induce larger rotational barriers than 2‐alkoxyl substituents. The rotational barriers of 3 g and 7 g are reduced by the presence of the 4‐dibenzylamino group owing to its ability to stabilize the coplanar rotation transition state electronically. The smaller rotational barriers found for B‐phenyl subporphyrins than for B‐methoxy subporphyrins indicate a negligible contribution of S_N1‐type heterolysis in the rotation of meso‐aryl substituents.     

Poly[μ‐aqua‐μ4‐naphthalene‐1,8‐dicarboxylato‐zinc(II)]

In the title complex, [Zn(C₁₂H₆O₄)(H₂O)]_n, a Zn^II polymer based on naphthalene‐1,8‐dicarboxylate (1,8‐nap), the Zn^II atoms adopt an elongated octahedral coordination geometry. A zigzag chain is formed by μ₂‐aqua ligands and μ₂‐carboxylate groups of the 1,8‐nap ligands. Adjacent parallel chains are further linked by 1,8‐nap ligands, forming a twisted two‐dimensional layer structure along the (100) plane.     

(μ‐C‐meso‐5,5,7,12,12,14‐Hexa­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐N‐acetato‐1κ5N,N′,N′′,N′′′,O:2κO′)­tetra­chloro‐1κCl,2κ3Cl‐cobalt(III)­zinc(II)

The crystal structure of the title compound, [CoCl(C₁₈H₃₇N₄O₂){ZnCl₃}], has been determined by X‐ray diffraction.C‐meso‐5,5,7,12,12,14‐Hexa­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclotetradecane‐N‐acetate acts as a bridging ligand to coodinate with Co^III and Zn^II ions. The Co^III ion is six‐coordinate in a nearly octahedral environment provided by one Cl atom, four N atoms of the bridging ligand, and one O atom. The Zn^II ion is four‐coordinate in a distorted tetrahedral environment completed by three Cl atoms and an O atom of the bridging ligand.     

5,20‐Bis(ethoxycarbonyl)‐Substituted Antiaromatic [28]Hexaphyrin and Its Bis‐NiII and Bis‐CuII Complexes

5,20‐Bis(ethoxycarbonyl)‐[28]hexaphyrin was synthesized by acid catalyzed cross‐condensation of meso‐diaryl‐substituted tripyrrane and ethyl 2‐oxoacetate followed by subsequent oxidation. This hexaphyrin was found to be a stable 28π‐antiaromatic compound with a dumbbell‐like conformation. Upon oxidization with PbO₂, this [28]hexaphyrin was converted into an aromatic [26]hexaphyrin with a rectangular shape bearing two ester groups at the edge side. The [28]hexaphyrin can incorporate two Ni^II or Cu^II metals by using the ester carbonyl groups and three pyrrolic nitrogen atoms to give bis‐Ni^II and bis‐Cu^II complexes with essentially the same dumbbell‐like structure. The antiaromatic properties of the [28]hexaphyrin and its metal complexes have been well characterized.     

Directly Linked and Fused Oligoporphyrin Arrays from Oxidation of Metalloporphyrins

The Ag^I-promoted oxidative meso-meso coupling reaction of 5,15-diaryl Zn^II-porphyrins is advantageous in light of its high regioselectivity as well as its easy extension to large porphyrin arrays. Linear meso-meso linked porphyrin 128-mer and three-dimensionally arranged grid porphyrin 48-mer were isolated in a discrete form by repetitive oxidation reaction and subsequent gel-permeation chromatography (GPC)-HPLC. 5,15-Diaryl Cu^II-, Ni^II-, and Pd^II-porphyrins were converted to meso- doubly-linked diporphyrins by oxidation with(p-BrC₆H₄)₃NSbCl₆. End-aryl-capped meso-meso linked Cu^II-, Ni^II-, and Pd^II- diporphyrins were converted to completely fused meso-meso - -triply-linked diporphyrins through the oxidative ring closure (ODRC) reaction with (p-BrC₆H₄)₃NSbCl₆. Finally, we found that Sc^III-catalyzed oxidation with DDQ gave a very efficient ODRC reaction and hence allowed the synthesis of triply-linked oligoporphyrins up to 12-mer.     

[62]Tetradecaphyrin and Its Mono‐ and Bis‐ZnII Complexes

A coiled structure of meso‐pentafluorophenyl‐substituted [62]tetradecaphyrin 1 was revealed by X‐ray structural analysis. Synthetic protocols were devised to form mono‐ and bis‐Zn^II complexes, 1 Zn and 1 Zn₂ , selectively. The former displayed a trigonal‐bipyramidal pentacoordinated Zn^II ion as a rare case and a cyclic voltammogram exhibiting eleven reversible redox waves. The latter showed a Ci‐symmetric structure with modest Hückel aromaticity owing to a 62 π‐electronic circuit as the largest aromatic molecule to date.     

Tetraaryl ZnII Porphyrinates Substituted at β‐Pyrrolic Positions as Sensitizers in Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells: A Comparison with meso‐Disubstituted Push–Pull ZnII Porphyrinates

A facile and fast approach, based on microwave‐enhanced Sonogashira coupling, has been employed to obtain in good yields both mono‐ and, for the first time, disubstituted push–pull Zn^II porphyrinates bearing a variety of ethynylphenyl moieties at the β‐pyrrolic position(s). Furthermore, a comparative experimental, electrochemical, and theoretical investigation has been carried out on these β‐mono‐ or disubstituted Zn^II porphyrinates and meso‐disubstituted push–pull Zn^II porphyrinates. We have obtained evidence that, although the HOMO–LUMO energy gap of the meso‐substituted push–pull dyes is lower, so that charge transfer along the push–pull system therein is easier, the β‐mono‐ or disubstituted push–pull porphyrinic dyes show comparable or better efficiencies when acting as sensitizers in DSSCs. This behavior is apparently not attributable to more intense B and Q bands, but rather to more facile charge injection. This is suggested by the DFT electron distribution in a model of a β‐monosubstituted porphyrinic dye interacting with a TiO₂ surface and by the positive effect of the β substitution on the incident photon‐to‐current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra, which show a significant intensity over a broad wavelength range (350–650 nm). In contrast, meso‐substitution produces IPCE spectra with two less intense and well‐separated peaks. The positive effect exerted by a cyanoacrylic acid group attached to the ethynylphenyl substituent has been analyzed by a photophysical and theoretical approach. This provided supporting evidence of a contribution from charge‐transfer transitions to both the B and Q bands, thus producing, through conjugation, excited electrons close to the carboxylic anchoring group. Finally, the straightforward and effective synthetic procedures developed, as well as the efficiencies observed by photoelectrochemical measurements, make the described β‐monosubstituted Zn^II porphyrinates extremely promising sensitizers for use in DSSCs.     

Ruthenium Catalyzed C−H Acylmethylation of N‐Arylphthalazine‐1,4‐diones with α‐Carbonyl Sulfoxonium Ylides: Highway to Diversely Functionalized Phthalazino‐fused Cinnolines

A direct ortho‐Csp²‐H acylmethylation of 2‐aryl‐2,3‐dihydrophthalazine‐1,4‐diones with α‐carbonyl sulfoxonium ylides is achieved through a Ru^II‐catalyzed C?H bond activation process. The protocol featured high functional group tolerance on the two substrates, including aryl‐, heteroaryl‐, and alkyl‐substituted α‐carbonyl sulfoxonium ylides. Thereafter, 2‐(ortho‐acylmethylaryl)‐2,3‐dihydrophthalazine‐1,4‐diones were used as potential starting materials for the expeditious synthesis of 6‐arylphthalazino[2,3‐a]cinnoline‐8,13‐diones and 5‐acyl‐5,6‐dihydrophthalazino[2,3‐a]cinnoline‐8,13‐diones under Lawesson's reagent and BF₃?OEt₂ mediated conditions, respectively. Of these, the BF₃?OEt₂‐mediated cyclization proceeded in DMSO as a solvent and a methylene source via dual C?C and C?N bond formations.     

A three‐dimensional ZnII coordination framework: poly[[μ2‐(E)‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene][μ4‐(E)‐2,2′‐(diazene‐1,2‐diyl)dibenzoato][μ2‐(E)‐2,2′‐(diazene‐1,2‐diyl)dibenzoato]dizinc(II)]

In the title coordination polymer, [Zn₂(C₁₄H₈N₂O₄)₂(C₁₂H₁₀N₂)]_n, the asymmetric unit contains one Zn^II cation, two halves of 2,2′‐(diazene‐1,2‐diyl)dibenzoate anions (denoted L²⁻) and half of a 1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene ligand (denoted bpe). The three ligands lie across crystallographic inversion centres. Each Zn^II centre is four‐coordinated by three O atoms of bridging carboxylate groups from three L²⁻ ligands and by one N atom from a bpe ligand, forming a tetrahedral coordination geometry. Two Zn^II atoms are bridged by two carboxylate groups of L²⁻ ligands, generating a [Zn₂(CO₂)₂] ring. Each loop serves as a fourfold node, which links its four equivalent nodes via the sharing of four L²⁻ ligands to form a two‐dimensional [Zn₂L₄]_n net. These nets are separated by bpe ligands acting as spacers, producing a three‐dimensional framework with a 4⁶6⁴ topology. Powder X‐ray diffraction and solid‐state photoluminescence were also measured.     

Fourfold alkyl wrapping of a copper(II) porphyrin thwarts macrocycle π–π stacking in a compact supramolecular package

Porphyrins are valuable constituents in optoelectronic, catalytic, and other applications, yet control of intermolecular π–π stacking is invariably essential to attain the desired properties. Superstructures built onto the porphyrin, often via meso‐aryl groups, can afford facial encumbrance that suppresses π–π stacking, although some molecular designs have provided insufficient facial coverage and many have entailed cumbersome syntheses. In this study, a copper(II) porphyrin bearing four meso substituents, namely, {10,20‐bis[2,6‐bis(octyloxy)phenyl]‐5,15‐dibromoporphinato}copper(II), [Cu(C₆₄H₈₂Br₂N₄O₄)], was prepared by metalation of the corresponding free‐base porphyrin and was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structure reveals a dihedral angle of 111.1 (2)° for the plane of the meso‐aryl group relative to the plane of the porphyrin, with both aryl groups tilted in the same direction. Each of the four octyloxy groups exhibits a gauche conformation for the –OCH₂CH₂– unit but is extended with four or five anti (–CH₂CH₂–/H) conformations thereafter, causing each octyl group to span the dimension of the macrocycle. In a global frame of reference where the two Br atoms define the north/south poles and the two aryl groups are at antipodes on the equator, two octyl groups of one aryl unit project over the northern hemisphere (covering pyrroles A and B), whereas those of the other aryl unit project over the southern hemisphere (covering pyrroles C and D). Together, the four octyl groups ensheath the two faces of the porphyrin in a self‐wrapped assembly. The closest approach of the Cu atom to an octyl methylene C atom (position 6) is 3.5817 (18) Å, the mean separations of neighboring porphyrin planes are 8.059 (4) and 4.693 (8) Å along the a and c axes, respectively, and the center‐to‐center distances between the Cu atoms of neighboring porphyrins are 10.2725 (4), 12.2540 (6), and 12.7472 (6) Å along the a, b, and c axes, respectively. The Hirshfeld surface analysis and two‐dimensional (2D) fingerprint plots provide information concerning contact interactions in the supramolecular assembly of the solid crystal.     

Homo‐ and Heteronuclear meso,meso‐(E)‐Ethene‐1,2‐diyl‐Linked Diporphyrins: Preparation,X‐ray Crystal Structure,Electronic Absorption and Emission Spectra and Density Functional Theory Calculations

Homo‐ and heteronuclear meso,meso‐(E)‐ethene‐1,2‐diyl‐linked diporphyrins have been prepared by the Suzuki coupling of porphyrinylboronates and iodovinylporphyrins. Combinations comprising 5,10,15‐triphenylporphyrin (TriPP) on both ends of the ethene‐1,2‐diyl bridge M₂10 (M₂=H₂/Ni, Ni₂, Ni/Zn, H₄, H₂Zn, Zn₂) and 5,15‐bis(3,5‐di‐tert‐butylphenyl)porphyrinato‐nickel(II) on one end and H₂, Ni, and ZnTriPP on the other ( M₂11 ), enable the first studies of this class of compounds possessing intrinsic polarity. The compounds were characterized by electronic absorption and steady state emission spectra, ¹H NMR spectra, and for the Ni₂ bis(TriPP) complex Ni₂10 , single crystal X‐ray structure determination. The crystal structure shows ruffled distortions of the porphyrin rings, typical of Ni^II porphyrins, and the (E)‐C₂H₂ bridge makes a dihedral angle of 50° with the mean planes of the macrocycles. The result is a stepped parallel arrangement of the porphyrin rings. The dihedral angles in the solid state reflect the interplay of steric and electronic effects of the bridge on interporphyrin communication. The emission spectra in particular, suggest energy transfer across the bridge is fast in conformations in which the bridge is nearly coplanar with the rings. Comparisons of the fluorescence behaviour of H₄10 and H₂Ni10 show strong quenching of the free base fluorescence when the complex is excited at the lower energy component of the Soret band, a feature associated in the literature with more planar conformations. TDDFT calculations on the gas‐phase optimized geometry of Ni₂10 reproduce the features of the experimental electronic absorption spectrum within 0.1 eV.     

Phenylene‐bridged Porphyrin meso‐Oxy Radical Dimers

Stable meta‐ and para‐phenylene bridged porphyrin meso‐oxy radical dimers and their Ni^II and Zn^II complexes were synthesized. All the dimers exhibited optical and electrochemical properties similar to the corresponding porphyrin meso‐oxy radical monomers, indicating small electronic interaction between the two spins. Intramolecular spin‐spin interaction through the π‐spacer was determined to be J/k_B=?15.9 K for m‐phenylene bridged Zn^II porphyrin dimer. The observed weak antiferromagnetic interaction has been attributed to less effective conjugation between the porphyrin radical and linking π‐spacer due to large dihedral angle. In the case of Zn^II complexes, both para‐ and meta‐phenylene bridged dimers formed 1D‐chain in solutions and in the solid states through Zn‐O coordination.     

Metal(II) Ion Complexes with 5‐(Pyrazin‐2‐yl)‐2,4‐dihydro‐3H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐thione; Synthesis,Structural Characterization,Acid‐base,and Complexing Properties in Solution

The study reports the synthesis of complexes Co(HL)Cl₂ ( 1 ), Ni(HL)Cl₂ ( 2 ), Cu(HL)Cl₂ ( 3 ), and Zn(HL)₃Cl₂ ( 4 ) with the title ligand, 5‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole‐5‐thione (HL), and their characterization by elemental analyses, ESI‐MS (m/z), FT‐IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, as well as EPR in the case of the Cu^II complex. The comparative analysis of IR spectra of the metal ion complexes with HL and HL alone indicated that the metal ions in 1 , 2 , and 3 are chelated by two nitrogen atoms, N(4) of pyrazine and N(5) of triazole in the thiol tautomeric form, whereas the Zn^II ion in 4 is coordinated by the non‐protonated N(2) nitrogen atom of triazole in the thione form. pH potentiometry and UV/Vis spectroscopy were used to examine Co^II, Ni^II, and Zn^II complexes in 10/90 (v/v) DMSO/water solution, whereas the Cu^II complex was examined in 40/60 (v/v) DMSO/water solution. Monodeprotonation of the thione triazole in solution enables the formation of the L:M = 1:1 species with Co^II, Ni^II and Zn^II, the 2:1 species with Co^II and Zn^II, and the 3:1 species with Zn^II. A distorted tetrahedral arrangement of the Cu^II complex was suggested on the basis of EPR and Vis/NIR spectra.     

Synthesis of A2B6‐Type [36]Octaphyrins: Copper(II)‐Metalation‐Induced Fragmentation Reactions to Porphyrins and N‐Fusion Reactions of meso‐(3‐Thienyl) Substituents

5,10,15‐Tris(pentafluorophenyl)tetrapyrromethane was efficiently prepared through a route involving stepwise diaroylation of 5‐pentafluorophenyldipyrromethane. A₂B₆‐type [36]octaphyrins were prepared by the cross condensation of the tetrapyrromethane with aryl aldehydes in moderate yields. A₂B₆‐type [36]octaphyrins bearing 2,4,6‐trifluorophenyl, 2,6‐dichlorophenyl, and phenyl substituents underwent Cu^II‐metalation‐induced fragmentation to give two molecules of AB₃‐type Cu^II porphyrins. A₂B₆‐type [36]octaphyrin bearing 3‐thienyl substituents underwent thermal N‐thienyl fusion reactions to provide a modestly aromatic [38]octaphyrin, which, upon treatment with MnO₂, underwent further N‐thienyl fusion and subsequent oxidation to give a nonaromatic doubly N‐thienyl fused [36]octaphyrin.     

A three‐dimensional coordination polymer of 3‐(3,5‐dicarboxybenzyloxy)benzoic acid with zinc

The synthesis is reported of the tricarboxylic acid 3‐(3,5‐dicarboxybenzyloxy)benzoic acid (H₃L) and the product of its reaction under solvothermal conditions with Zn^II cations, namely poly[[μ₆‐3‐(3,5‐dicarboxylatobenzyloxy)benzoato](dimethylformamide)‐μ₃‐hydroxido‐dizinc(II)], [Zn₂(C₁₆H₉O₇)(OH)(C₃H₇NO)]_n, the formation of which is associated with complete deprotonation of H₃L. Its crystal structure consists of a single‐framework coordination polymer of the organic L³⁻ ligand with Zn^II cations in a 1:2 ratio, with additional hydroxide and dimethylformamide (DMF) ligands coordinated to the Zn^II centres. The Zn^II cations are characterized by coordination numbers of 5 and 6, being bridged to each other by hydroxide ligands. In the polymeric framework, the carboxylate‐ and hydroxy‐bridged Zn^II cations are arranged in coordination‐tessellated columns, which propagate along the a axis of the crystal structure, and each L³⁻ ligand links to seven different Zn^II centres via Zn—O bonds of two different columns. The coordination framework, composed of [Zn₂(L)(OH)(DMF)]_n units, forms an open architecture, the channel voids within it being filled by the zinc‐coordinating DMF ligands. This report provides the first structural evidence for the formation of coordination polymers with H₃L via multiple metal–ligand bonds through its carboxylate groups.<!?tpb=21.5pt>     

meso‐Bis{η5‐1‐[1‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐3‐(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienyl}iron(II) and the cobalt(II) analogue

The two title crystalline compounds, viz.meso‐bis{η⁵‐1‐[1‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐3‐(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienyl}iron(II), [Fe(C₁₂H₂₀NSi)₂], (II), and meso‐bis{η⁵‐1‐[1‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐3‐(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienyl}cobalt(II), [Co(C₁₂H₂₀NSi)₂], (III), were obtained by the reaction of lithium 1‐[1‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐3‐(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienide with FeCl₂ and CoCl₂, respectively. For (II), the trimethylsilyl‐ and dimethylaminoethenyl‐substituted cyclopentadienyl (Cp) rings present a nearly eclipsed conformation, and the two pairs of trimethylsilyl and dimethylaminoethenyl substituents on the Cp rings are arranged in an interlocked fashion. In the case of (III), the same substituted Cp rings are perfectly staggered leading to a crystallographically centrosymmetric molecular structure, and the two trimethylsilyl and two dimethylaminoethenyl substituents are oriented in opposite directions, respectively, with the trimethylsilyl group of one Cp ring and the dimethylaminoethenyl group of the other Cp ring arranged more closely than in (II).     

Synthesis of Dendritic Metalloporphyrins with Distal H‐Bond Donors as Model Systems for Hemoglobin

We report the synthesis of the first‐ (G1) and second‐generation (G2) dendritic Fe^II porphyrins 1?Fe – 4?Fe (G1) and 6?Fe (G2) bearing distal H‐bond donors ideally positioned for stabilization of Fe^II? O₂ adducts by H‐bonding (Fig. 1). A first approach towards the construction of these novel biomimetic systems failed unexpectedly: the Suzuki cross‐coupling between appropriately functionalized Zn^II porphyrins and ortho‐ethynylated aryl derivatives, serving as anchors for the distal H‐bond donor moieties, was unsuccessful (Schemes 1, 3, and 5), presumably due to steric hindrance resulting from unfavorable coordination of the ethynyl residue to the Pd species in the catalytic cycle (Scheme 6). The target molecules were finally prepared by a route in which the ortho‐ethynylated meso‐aryl ring is introduced during porphyrin construction in a mixed condensation involving the two dipyrrylmethanes 33 and 34 , and aldehyde 36 (Schemes 7 and 8). Following attachment of the dendrons (Scheme 11), the distal H‐bond donors were introduced by Sonogashira cross‐coupling (Scheme 12), and subsequent metallation afforded the dendritic Fe^II porphyrins 1?Fe – 6?Fe . ¹H‐NMR Spectroscopy proved the location of the H‐bond donor moiety atop the porphyrin surface, and X‐ray crystal‐structure analysis of model system 45 (Fig. 2) revealed that this moiety would not sterically interfere with gas binding. With 1,2‐dimethyl‐1H‐imidazole (DiMeIm) as ligand, the dendritic Fe^II porphyrins formed five‐coordinate high‐spin complexes (Figs. 3 and 4) and addition of CO led reversibly to the corresponding stable six‐coordinate gas complexes (Fig. 6). Oxygenation, however, did not result in defined Fe^II? O₂ complexes as rapid decomposition to Fe^III species took place immediately, even in the case of the G2 dendrimer 6?Fe (DiMeIm) (Fig. 7). In contrast, stable gas adducts are formed between dendritic Co^II porphyrins and O₂ in the presence of DiMeIm as axial ligand, as revealed by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The possible stabilization of these complexes through H‐bonding involving the distal ligand is currently under investigation in multidimensional and multifrequency pulse EPR experiments.