Undercover: a primal MINLP heuristic exploring a largest sub-MIP

We present Undercover, a primal heuristic for nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) that explores a mixed-integer linear subproblem (sub-MIP) of a given MINLP. We solve a vertex covering problem to identify a smallest set of variables to fix, a so-called cover, such that each constraint is linearized. Subsequently, these variables are fixed to values obtained from a reference point, e.g., an optimal solution of a linear relaxation. Each feasible solution of the sub-MIP corresponds to a feasible solution of the original problem. We apply domain propagation to try to avoid infeasibilities, and conflict analysis to learn additional constraints from infeasibilities that are nonetheless encountered. We present computational results on a test set of mixed-integer quadratically constrained programs (MIQCPs) and MINLPs. It turns out that the majority of these instances allows for small covers. Although general in nature, we show that the heuristic is most successful on MIQCPs. It nicely complements existing root-node heuristics in different state-of-the-art solvers and helps to significantly improve the overall performance of the MINLP solver SCIP.     

Global solution of bilevel programs with a nonconvex inner program

A bounding algorithm for the global solution of nonlinear bilevel programs involving nonconvex functions in both the inner and outer programs is presented. The algorithm is rigorous and terminates finitely to a point that satisfies ε-optimality in the inner and outer programs. For the lower bounding problem, a relaxed program, containing the constraints of the inner and outer programs augmented by a parametric upper bound to the parametric optimal solution function of the inner program, is solved to global optimality. The optional upper bounding problem is based on probing the solution obtained by the lower bounding procedure. For the case that the inner program satisfies a constraint qualification, an algorithmic heuristic for tighter lower bounds is presented based on the KKT necessary conditions of the inner program. The algorithm is extended to include branching, which is not required for convergence but has potential advantages. Two branching heuristics are described and analyzed. Convergence proofs are provided and numerical results for original test problems and for literature examples are presented.     

A linear programming approach for linear programs with probabilistic constraints

We study a class of mixed-integer programs for solving linear programs with joint probabilistic constraints from random right-hand side vectors with finite distributions. We present greedy and dual heuristic algorithms that construct and solve a sequence of linear programs. We provide optimality gaps for our heuristic solutions via the linear programming relaxation of the extended mixed-integer formulation of Luedtke et al. (2010) [13] as well as via lower bounds produced by their cutting plane method. While we demonstrate through an extensive computational study the effectiveness and scalability of our heuristics, we also prove that the theoretical worst-case solution quality for these algorithms is arbitrarily far from optimal. Our computational study compares our heuristics against both the extended mixed-integer programming formulation and the cutting plane method of Luedtke et al. (2010) [13]. Our heuristics efficiently and consistently produce solutions with small optimality gaps, while for larger instances the extended formulation becomes intractable and the optimality gaps from the cutting plane method increase to over 5%.     

Quadratic factorization heuristics for copositive programming

Copositive optimization problems are particular conic programs: optimize linear forms over the copositive cone subject to linear constraints. Every quadratic program with linear constraints can be formulated as a copositive program, even if some of the variables are binary. So this is an NP-hard problem class. While most methods try to approximate the copositive cone from within, we propose a method which approximates this cone from outside. This is achieved by passing to the dual problem, where the feasible set is an affine subspace intersected with the cone of completely positive matrices, and this cone is approximated from within. We consider feasible descent directions in the completely positive cone, and regularized strictly convex subproblems. In essence, we replace the intractable completely positive cone with a nonnegative cone, at the cost of a series of nonconvex quadratic subproblems. Proper adjustment of the regularization parameter results in short steps for the nonconvex quadratic programs. This suggests to approximate their solution by standard linearization techniques. Preliminary numerical results on three different classes of test problems are quite promising.     

An eigenvalue decomposition based branch-and-bound algorithm for nonconvex quadratic programming problems with convex quadratic constraints

In this paper, we propose a branch-and-bound algorithm for finding a global optimal solution for a nonconvex quadratic program with convex quadratic constraints (NQPCQC). We first reformulate NQPCQC by adding some nonconvex quadratic constraints induced by eigenvectors of negative eigenvalues associated with the nonconvex quadratic objective function to Shor’s semidefinite relaxation. Under the assumption of having a bounded feasible domain, these nonconvex quadratic constraints can be further relaxed into linear ones to form a special semidefinite programming relaxation. Then an efficient branch-and-bound algorithm branching along the eigendirections of negative eigenvalues is designed. The theoretic convergence property and the worst-case complexity of the proposed algorithm are proved. Numerical experiments are conducted on several types of quadratic programs to show the efficiency of the proposed method.     

Conic mixed-integer rounding cuts

A conic integer program is an integer programming problem with conic constraints. Many problems in finance, engineering, statistical learning, and probabilistic optimization are modeled using conic constraints. Here we study mixed-integer sets defined by second-order conic constraints. We introduce general-purpose cuts for conic mixed-integer programming based on polyhedral conic substructures of second-order conic sets. These cuts can be readily incorporated in branch-and-bound algorithms that solve either second-order conic programming or linear programming relaxations of conic integer programs at the nodes of the branch-and-bound tree. Central to our approach is a reformulation of the second-order conic constraints with polyhedral second-order conic constraints in a higher dimensional space. In this representation the cuts we develop are linear, even though they are nonlinear in the original space of variables. This feature leads to a computationally efficient implementation of nonlinear cuts for conic mixed-integer programming. The reformulation also allows the use of polyhedral methods for conic integer programming. We report computational results on solving unstructured second-order conic mixed-integer problems as well as mean–variance capital budgeting problems and least-squares estimation problems with binary inputs. Our computational experiments show that conic mixed-integer rounding cuts are very effective in reducing the integrality gap of continuous relaxations of conic mixed-integer programs and, hence, improving their solvability. This research has been supported, in part, by Grant # DMI0700203 from the National Science Foundation.     

Outer approximation algorithms for separable nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs

A rigorous decomposition approach to solve separable mixed-integer nonlinear programs where the participating functions are nonconvex is presented. The proposed algorithms consist of solving an alternating sequence of Relaxed Master Problems (mixed-integer linear program) and two nonlinear programming problems (NLPs). A sequence of valid nondecreasing lower bounds and upper bounds is generated by the algorithms which converge in a finite number of iterations. A Primal Bounding Problem is introduced, which is a convex NLP solved at each iteration to derive valid outer approximations of the nonconvex functions in the continuous space. Two decomposition algorithms are presented in this work. On finite termination, the first yields the global solution to the original nonconvex MINLP and the second finds a rigorous bound to the global solution. Convergence and optimality properties, and refinement of the algorithms for efficient implementation are presented. Finally, numerical results are compared with currently available algorithms for example problems, illuminating the potential benefits of the proposed algorithm.     

Valid inequalities for separable concave constraints with indicator variables

We study valid inequalities for optimization models that contain both binary indicator variables and separable concave constraints. These models reduce to a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) when the concave constraints are ignored, or to a nonconvex global optimization problem when the binary restrictions are ignored. In algorithms designed to solve these problems to global optimality, cutting planes to strengthen the relaxation are traditionally obtained using valid inequalities for the MILP only. We propose a technique to obtain valid inequalities that are based on both the MILP constraints and the concave constraints. We begin by characterizing the convex hull of a four-dimensional set consisting of a single binary indicator variable, a single concave constraint, and two linear inequalities. Using this analysis, we demonstrate how valid inequalities for the single node flow set and for the lot-sizing polyhedron can be “tilted” to give valid inequalities that also account for separable concave functions of the arc flows. We present computational results demonstrating the utility of the new inequalities for nonlinear transportation problems and for lot-sizing problems with concave costs. To our knowledge, this is one of the first works that simultaneously convexifies both nonconvex functions and binary variables to strengthen the relaxations of practical mixed-integer nonlinear programs.     

A hierarchy of relaxations for nonlinear convex generalized disjunctive programming

We propose a framework to generate alternative mixed-integer nonlinear programming formulations for disjunctive convex programs that lead to stronger relaxations. We extend the concept of “basic steps” defined for disjunctive linear programs to the nonlinear case. A basic step is an operation that takes a disjunctive set to another with fewer number of conjuncts. We show that the strength of the relaxations increases as the number of conjuncts decreases, leading to a hierarchy of relaxations. We prove that the tightest of these relaxations, allows in theory the solution of the disjunctive convex program as a nonlinear programming problem. We present a methodology to guide the generation of strong relaxations without incurring an exponential increase of the size of the reformulated mixed-integer program. Finally, we apply the theory developed to improve the computational efficiency of solution methods for nonlinear convex generalized disjunctive programs (GDP). This methodology is validated through a set of numerical examples.     

A new Lagrangean approach to the pooling problem

We present a new Lagrangean approach for the pooling problem. The relaxation targets all nonlinear constraints, and results in a Lagrangean subproblem with a nonlinear objective function and linear constraints, that is reformulated as a linear mixed integer program. Besides being used to generate lower bounds, the subproblem solutions are exploited within Lagrangean heuristics to find feasible solutions. Valid cuts, derived from bilinear terms, are added to the subproblem to strengthen the Lagrangean bound and improve the quality of feasible solutions. The procedure is tested on a benchmark set of fifteen problems from the literature. The proposed bounds are found to outperform or equal earlier bounds from the literature on 14 out of 15 tested problems. Similarly, the Lagrangean heuristics outperform the VNS and MALT heuristics on 4 instances. Furthermore, the Lagrangean lower bound is equal to the global optimum for nine problems, and on average is 2.1% from the optimum. The Lagrangean heuristics, on the other hand, find the global solution for ten problems and on average are 0.043% from the optimum.     

A heuristic to generate rank-1 GMI cuts

Gomory mixed-integer (GMI) cuts are among the most effective cutting planes for general mixed-integer programs (MIP). They are traditionally generated from an optimal basis of a linear programming (LP) relaxation of a MIP. In this paper we propose a heuristic to generate useful GMI cuts from additional bases of the initial LP relaxation. The cuts we generate have rank one, i.e., they do not use previously generated GMI cuts. We demonstrate that for problems in MIPLIB 3.0 and MIPLIB 2003, the cuts we generate form an important subclass of all rank-1 mixed-integer rounding cuts. Further, we use our heuristic to generate globally valid rank-1 GMI cuts at nodes of a branch-and-cut tree and use these cuts to solve a difficult problem from MIPLIB 2003, namely timtab2, without using problem-specific cuts.     

Piecewise polyhedral formulations for a multilinear term

In this paper, we present a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulation of a piecewise, polyhedral relaxation (PPR) of a multilinear term using its convex-hull representation. Based on the PPR’s solution, we also present a MILP formulation whose solutions are feasible for nonconvex, multilinear equations. We then present computational results showing the effectiveness of proposed formulations on standard benchmark nonlinear programs (NLPs) with multilinear terms and compare with a traditional formulation that is built using recursive bilinear groupings of multilinear terms.     

Feasibility pump 2.0

Finding a feasible solution of a given mixed-integer programming (MIP) model is a very important ${\mathcal{NP}}$ -complete problem that can be extremely hard in practice. Feasibility Pump (FP) is a heuristic scheme for finding a feasible solution to general MIPs that can be viewed as a clever way to round a sequence of fractional solutions of the LP relaxation, until a feasible one is eventually found. In this paper we study the effect of replacing the original rounding function (which is fast and simple, but somehow blind) with more clever rounding heuristics. In particular, we investigate the use of a diving-like procedure based on rounding and constraint propagation—a basic tool in Constraint Programming. Extensive computational results on binary and general integer MIPs from the literature show that the new approach produces a substantial improvement of the FP success rate, without slowing-down the method and with a significantly better quality of the feasible solutions found.     

Global solution of nonlinear mixed-integer bilevel programs

An algorithm for the global optimization of nonlinear bilevel mixed-integer programs is presented, based on a recent proposal for continuous bilevel programs by Mitsos et al. (J Glob Optim 42(4):475–513, 2008). The algorithm relies on a convergent lower bound and an optional upper bound. No branching is required or performed. The lower bound is obtained by solving a mixed-integer nonlinear program, containing the constraints of the lower-level and upper-level programs; its convergence is achieved by also including a parametric upper bound to the optimal solution function of the lower-level program. This lower-level parametric upper bound is based on Slater-points of the lower-level program and subsets of the upper-level host sets for which this point remains lower-level feasible. Under suitable assumptions the KKT necessary conditions of the lower-level program can be used to tighten the lower bounding problem. The optional upper bound to the optimal solution of the bilevel program is obtained by solving an augmented upper-level problem for fixed upper-level variables. A convergence proof is given along with illustrative examples. An implementation is described and applied to a test set comprising original and literature problems. The main complication relative to the continuous case is the construction of the parametric upper bound to the lower-level optimal objective value, in particular due to the presence of upper-level integer variables. This challenge is resolved by performing interval analysis over the convex hull of the upper-level integer variables.     

RENS

This article introduces rens, the relaxation enforced neighborhood search, a large neighborhood search algorithm for mixed integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs). It uses a sub-MINLP to explore the set of feasible roundings of an optimal solution $\bar{x}$ of a linear or nonlinear relaxation. The sub-MINLP is constructed by fixing integer variables $x_j$ with $\bar{x} _{j} \in \mathbb {Z}$ and bounding the remaining integer variables to $x_{j} \in \{ \lfloor \bar{x} _{j} \rfloor , \lceil \bar{x} _{j} \rceil \}$ . We describe two different applications of rens: as a standalone algorithm to compute an optimal rounding of the given starting solution and as a primal heuristic inside a complete MINLP solver. We use the former to compare different kinds of relaxations and the impact of cutting planes on the so-called roundability of the corresponding optimal solutions. We further utilize rens to analyze the performance of three rounding heuristics implemented in the branch-cut-and-price framework scip. Finally, we study the impact of rens when it is applied as a primal heuristic inside scip. All experiments were performed on three publicly available test sets of mixed integer linear programs (MIPs), mixed integer quadratically constrained programs (MIQCPs), and MINLP s, using solely software which is available in source code. It turns out that for these problem classes 60 to 70 % of the instances have roundable relaxation optima and that the success rate of rens does not depend on the percentage of fractional variables. Last but not least, rens applied as primal heuristic complements nicely with existing primal heuristics in scip.     

An interior point algorithm to solve computationally difficult set covering problems

We present an interior point approach to the zero–one integer programming feasibility problem based on the minimization of a nonconvex potential function. Given a polytope defined by a set of linear inequalities, this procedure generates a sequence of strict interior points of this polytope, such that each consecutive point reduces the value of the potential function. An integer solution (not necessarily feasible) is generated at each iteration by a rounding scheme. The direction used to determine the new iterate is computed by solving a nonconvex quadratic program on an ellipsoid. We illustrate the approach by considering a class of difficult set covering problems that arise from computing the 1-width of the incidence matrix of Steiner triple systems.     

Branch-and-price for a class of nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs

This work attempts to combine the strengths of two major technologies that have matured over the last three decades: global mixed-integer nonlinear optimization and branch-and-price. We consider a class of generally nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) with linear complicating constraints and integer linking variables. If the complicating constraints are removed, the problem becomes easy to solve, e.g. due to decomposable structure. Integrality of the linking variables allows us to apply a discretization approach to derive a Dantzig-Wolfe reformulation and solve the problem to global optimality using branch-andprice. It is a remarkably simple idea; but to our surprise, it has barely found any application in the literature. In this work, we show that many relevant problems directly fall or can be reformulated into this class of MINLPs. We present the branch-and-price algorithm and demonstrate its effectiveness (and sometimes ineffectiveness) in an extensive computational study considering multiple large-scale problems of practical relevance, showing that, in many cases, orders-of-magnitude reductions in solution time can be achieved.

     

Multi-Path Approach for Reliability-Redundancy Allocation Using a Scaling Method

The reliability-redundancy allocation problem is an optimization problem that achieves better system reliability by determining levels of component redundancies and reliabilities simultaneously. The problem is classified with the hardest problems in the reliability optimization field because the decision variables are mixed-integer and the system reliability function is nonlinear, non-separable, and non-convex. Thus, iterative heuristics are highly recommended for solving the problem due to their reasonable solution quality and relatively short computation time. At present, most iterative heuristics use sensitivity factors to select an appropriate variable which significantly improves the system reliability. The sensitivity factor represents the impact amount of each variable to the system reliability at a designated iteration. However, these heuristics are inefficient in terms of solution quality and computation time because the sensitivity factor calculations are performed only at integer variables. It results in degradation of the exploration and growth in the number of subsequent continuous nonlinear programming (NLP) subproblems. To overcome the drawbacks of existing iterative heuristics, we propose a new scaling method based on the multi-path iterative heuristics introduced by Ha (2004). The scaling method is able to compute sensitivity factors for all decision variables and results in a decreased number of NLP subproblems. In addition, the approximation heuristic for NLP subproblems helps to avoid redundant computation of NLP subproblems caused by outlined solution candidates. Numerical experimental results show that the proposed heuristic is superior to the best existing heuristic in terms of solution quality and computation time.     

Interval Methods for Semi-Infinite Programs

A new approach for the numerical solution of smooth, nonlinear semi-infinite programs whose feasible set contains a nonempty interior is presented. Interval analysis methods are used to construct finite nonlinear, or mixed-integer nonlinear, reformulations of the original semi-infinite program under relatively mild assumptions on the problem structure. In certain cases the finite reformulation is exact and can be solved directly for the global minimum of the semi-infinite program (SIP). In the general case, this reformulation is over-constrained relative to the SIP, such that solving it yields a guaranteed feasible upper bound to the SIP solution. This upper bound can then be refined using a subdivision procedure which is shown to converge to the true SIP solution with finite -optimality. In particular, the method is shown to converge for SIPs which do not satisfy regularity assumptions required by reduction-based methods, and for which certain points in the feasible set are subject to an infinite number of active constraints. Numerical results are presented for a number of problems in the SIP literature. The solutions obtained are compared to those identified by reduction-based methods, the relative performances of the nonlinear and mixed-integer nonlinear formulations are studied, and the use of different inclusion functions in the finite reformulation is investigated.     

An Exact Reformulation Algorithm for Large Nonconvex NLPs Involving Bilinear Terms

Many nonconvex nonlinear programming (NLP) problems of practical interest involve bilinear terms and linear constraints, as well as, potentially, other convex and nonconvex terms and constraints. In such cases, it may be possible to augment the formulation with additional linear constraints (a subset of Reformulation-Linearization Technique constraints) which do not affect the feasible region of the original NLP but tighten that of its convex relaxation to the extent that some bilinear terms may be dropped from the problem formulation. We present an efficient graph-theoretical algorithm for effecting such exact reformulations of large, sparse NLPs. The global solution of the reformulated problem using spatial Branch-and Bound algorithms is usually significantly faster than that of the original NLP. We illustrate this point by applying our algorithm to a set of pooling and blending global optimization problems.