Influence of Cl/Br substitution on the stereochemical peculiarities of copper(I) π‐complexes with the 1‐allyl‐2‐amino­pyridinium cation

By using alternating‐current electrochemical synthesis, crystals of the Cu^Iπ‐complexes bis(1‐allyl‐2‐amino­pyridinium) di‐μ‐chloro‐bis­[chloro­copper(I)], (C₈H₁₁N₂)₂[Cu₂Cl₄] or [H₂NC₅H₄NC₃H₅][CuCl₂], and bis(1‐allyl‐2‐amino­pyridinium) di‐μ‐(chloro/bromo)‐bis­[(chloro/bromo)copper(I)], (C₈H₁₁N₂)₂[Cu₂Br_2.2Cl_1.8] or [H₂NC₅H₄NC₃H₅][CuBr_1.10Cl_0.90], have been obtained and structurally investigated. In each of the isostructural (isomorphous) compounds, the distorted tetrahedral Cu environment involves three halide atoms and the C=C bond of the ligand. Both compounds reside on inversion centres, and the dimeric [Cu₂X₄·2H₂NC₅H₄NC₃H₅] units are bonded into a three‐dimensional structure by N—H⋯X hydrogen bonds. The Br content in the terminal X1 position is much higher than that in the bridged X2 site.     

Novel ion pairs obtained from the reaction of titanium(IV) halides with simple arsane ligands

The compounds tert‐butylarsenium(III) tri‐μ‐chlorido‐bis[trichloridotitanium(IV)], (C₄H₁₂As)[Ti₂Cl₉] or [^tBuAsH₃][Ti₂(μ‐Cl)₃Cl₆], (II), and bis[bromidotriphenylarsenium(V)] di‐μ‐bromido‐μ‐oxido‐bis[tribromidotitanium(IV)], (C₁₈H₁₅AsBr)₂[Ti₂Br₈O] or [Ph₃AsBr]₂[Ti₂(μ‐O)(μ‐Br)₂Br₆], (III), were obtained unexpectedly from the reaction of simple arsane ligands with Ti^IV halides, with (II) lying on a mirror plane in the unit cell of the space group Pbcm. Both compounds contain a completely novel ion, with [^tBuAsH₃]⁺ constituting the first structurally characterized example of a primary arsenium cation. The oxide‐bridged titanium‐containing [Ti₂(μ‐O)(μ‐Br)₂Br₆]²⁻ dianion in (III) is also novel, while the bromidotriphenylarsenium(V) cation is structurally characterized for only the second time.     

Cadmium(II) chloride,bromide and iodide complexes with 4,4′‐bipyridazine: when are diazine and halide bridges (in)compatible?

In poly[di‐μ‐chlorido‐μ‐(4,4′‐bipyridazine)‐κ²N¹:N^1′‐cadmium(II)], [CdCl₂(C₈H₆N₄)]_n, (I), and its isomorphous bromide analogue, [CdBr₂(C₈H₆N₄)]_n, (II), the halide atom lies on a mirror plane and the Cd^II ion resides at the intersection of two perpendicular mirror planes with m2m site symmetry. The pyridazine rings of the ligand lie in a mirror plane and are related to each other by a second mirror plane perpendicular to the first. The compounds adopt the characteristic structure of the [M^IIX₂(bipy)] type (bipy is bipyridine) based on crosslinking of [Cd(μ‐X)₂]_n chains [Cd—Cl = 2.5955 (9) and 2.6688 (9) Å; Cd—Br = 2.7089 (4) and 2.8041 (3) Å] by bitopic rod‐like organic ligands [Cd—N = 2.368 (3)–2.380 (3) Å]. This feature is discussed in terms of supramolecular stabilization, implying that the periodicity of the inorganic chain [Cd...Cd = 3.7802 (4) Å in (I) and 3.9432 (3) Å in (II)] is favourable for extensive parallel π–π stacking of monodentate pyridazine rings, with centroid–centroid distances of 3.7751 (4) Å in (I) and 3.9359 (4) Å in (II). This is not the case for the longer iodide bridges, which cannot stabilize such a pattern. In poly[tetra‐μ‐iodido‐μ₄‐(4,4′‐bipyridazine)‐κ⁴N¹:N²:N^1′:N^2′‐dicadmium(II)], [Cd₂I₄(C₈H₆N₄)]_n, (III), the ligands are situated across a centre of inversion; they are tetradentate [Cd—N = 2.488 (2) and 2.516 (2) Å] and link successive [Cd(μ‐I)₂]_n chains [Cd—I = 2.8816 (3)–3.0069 (4) Å] into corrugated layers.     

Two different one‐dimensional structural motifs in [catena‐{Cu(tacn)}2Pd(CN)4]Br2·[catena‐Cu(tacn)Pd(CN)4]2·H2O (tacn is 1,4,7‐triazacyclononane)

The title compound, catena‐poly[[bis[(triazacyclononane‐κ³N,N′,N′′)copper(II)]‐di‐μ‐cyanido‐κ⁴N:C‐palladate(II)‐di‐μ‐cyanido‐κ⁴C:N] dibromide bis[[(triazacyclononane‐κ³N,N′,N′′)copper(II)]‐μ‐cyanido‐κ²N:C‐[dicyanidopalladate(II)]‐μ‐cyanido‐κ²C:N] monohydrate], {[Cu₂Pd(CN)₄(C₆H₁₅N₃)₂]Br₂·[Cu₂Pd₂(CN)₈(C₆H₁₅N₃)₂]·H₂O}_n, (I), was isolated from an aqueous solution containing tacn·3HBr (tacn is 1,4,7‐triazacyclononane), Cu²⁺ and tetracyanidopalladate(2−) anions. The crystal structure of (I) is essentially ionic and built up of 2,2‐electroneutral chains, viz. [Cu(tacn)(NC)–Pd(CN)₂–(CN)–], positively charged 2,4‐ribbons exhibiting the composition {[Cu(tacn)(NC)₂–Pd(CN)₂–Cu(tacn)]²ⁿ⁺}_n, bromide anions and one disordered water molecule of crystallization. The O atom of the water molecule occupies two unique crystallographic positions, one on a centre of symmetry, which is half occupied, and the other in a general position with one‐quarter occupancy. One of the tacn ligands also exhibits disorder. The formation of two different types of one‐dimensional structural motif within the same structure is a unique feature of this compound.     

An organic–inorganic hybrid compound containing imidazolium cations and a one‐dimensional lithium hexacyanidocobaltate‐based anionic framework

An organic–inorganic hybrid compound, catena‐poly[bis(3H‐imidazol‐1‐ium) [[tetracyanido‐κ⁴C‐cobalt(III)]‐μ‐cyanido‐κ²C:N‐[diaqualithium(I)]‐μ‐cyanido‐κ²N:C]], {(C₃H₅N₂)₂[CoLi(CN)₆(H₂O)₂]}_n, was synthesized by the reaction of Li₃[Co(CN)₆] with imidazolium chloride in aqueous solution. The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (data collected at 273 K). In the crystal structure, neighbouring [Co(CN)₆]³⁻ anionic units are linked by Li⁺ cations through the cyanide groups in a trans mode, forming a one‐dimensional zigzag chain structure extending along the c axis. A three‐dimensional supramolecular network is formed through hydrogen‐bonding interactions and is further stabilized by weak CN...π interactions between the cyanide groups and the imidazolium cations.     

Cyclopentadienyl Dicarbonyl Iron‐Bismuth Compounds – Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity

Abstract. The cyclopentadienyl‐substituted iron‐bismuth complexes [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiCl₂] ( 1 ), [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 2 ), [{Cp′′(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 3 ) and [{Cp*(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 4 ) were prepared with high yields starting from [Cp^x(CO)₂Fe]₂ [Cp^x = C₅H₅ (Cp), C₅H₃‐1, 3‐tBu₂ (Cp′′), C₅Me₅ (Cp*)] and the corresponding bismuth halides. The single crystal X‐ray structure analyses of compounds 2 – 4 are reported. Comparison of their solubility demonstrates that the steric hindrance in this type of compounds is only slightly higher for compound 3 compared with compound 2 but significantly lower compared with the Cp* derivative 4 . Compounds 1 – 4 react with nucleophililic reagents such as KOtBu, NaOCH₂CH₂OCH₃, and NaOSiMe₃ as well as with water in the presence of an amine to give a mixture of [{Cp^x(CO)₂Fe}BiX] (X = Cl, Br) and [{Cp^x(CO)₂Fe}₃Bi]. In case of a reaction with nBu₄NCl and DMAP (dimethylaminopyridine) no such dismutation is observed. Instead the complexes [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂(DMAP)₂] ( 5 ), [NnBu₄]₂[{{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₃}₂] ( 6 ) and [NnBu₄]₂[{{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiCl₃}₂] ( 7 ) were isolated and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

One‐dimensional zinc‐based coord­in­ation polymers incorporating cyanate anions

Two one‐dimensional zinc‐based coordination polymers containing cyanate anions are reported. catena‐Poly[sodium [[tricyanato­zinc(II)]‐μ‐1,4‐diaza­bicyclo­[2.2.2]octane‐κ²N:N′]], {Na[Zn(NCO)₃(C₆H₁₂N₂)]}_n, consists of linear [tricyanato­zinc(II)]‐μ‐1,4‐diaza­bicyclo­[2.2.2]octane strands in which the Zn²⁺ cations adopt trigonal–bipyramidal coordination on sites of m2 point symmetry. Na⁺ cations lie between the strands on sites of m point symmetry, coordinated in a distorted octa­hedral geometry by six O atoms of the cyanate anions. catena‐Poly[[dicyanato­zinc(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ²N:N′], [Zn(NCO)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)]_n, crystallizes in the space group P2₁/n with Z′ = 5. The structure consists of zigzag strands formed by Zn²⁺ cations linked via 4,4′‐bipyridine. Each Zn²⁺ cation adopts a tetra­hedral coordination, with two sites occupied by 4,4′‐bipyridine and two cyanate anions completing the coordination sphere. The structure is closely comparable with the thio­cyanate and halide analogues [ZnX₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)] (X = NCS, Cl or Br).     

{[SmCl(en)4][In2Te4]}n: an indium telluride with a one‐dimensional sinusoidal chain

The title compound, catena‐poly[[chloridotetrakis(ethylenediamine‐κ²N,N′)samarium(III)] [indium(III)‐di‐μ‐tellurido‐indium(III)‐di‐μ‐tellurido]], {[SmCl(C₂H₈N₂)₄][In₂Te₄]}_n, consists of a one‐dimensional sinusoidal {[InTe₂]⁻}_n anionic chain and [SmCl(en)₄]²⁺ cations (en is ethylenediamine). The only other previously reported lanthanide analogue, viz. [LaCl(en)₄][In₂Te₄], contains more usual linear one‐dimensional {[InTe₂]⁻}_n anion chains [Chen, Li, Chen & Proserpio (1998). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 273 , 255–258]. The one‐dimensional polymeric {[InTe₂]⁻}_n chain is built of InTe₄ tetrahedra sharing opposite edges. The Sm^III ion in the [SmCl(en)₄]²⁺ cation is nine‐coordinated by eight N atoms from four bidentate en molecules and by one chloride ion to form a monocapped square‐antiprismatic geometry. The presence or absence of N—H...Cl hydrogen bonding is shown to affect the conformation of the anion.     

Unusual 4‐arsonoanilinium cationic species in the hydrochloride salt of (4‐aminophenyl)arsonic acid and formed in the reaction of the acid with copper(II) sulfate,copper(II) chloride and cadmium chloride

Structures having the unusual protonated 4‐arsonoanilinium species, namely in the hydrochloride salt, C₆H₉AsNO₃⁺·Cl⁻, (I), and the complex salts formed from the reaction of (4‐aminophenyl)arsonic acid (p‐arsanilic acid) with copper(II) sulfate, i.e. hexaaquacopper(II) bis(4‐arsonoanilinium) disulfate dihydrate, (C₆H₉AsNO₃)₂[Cu(H₂O)₆](SO₄)₂·2H₂O, (II), with copper(II) chloride, i.e. poly[bis(4‐arsonoanilinium) [tetra‐μ‐chlorido‐cuprate(II)]], {(C₆H₉AsNO₃)₂[CuCl₄]}_n , (III), and with cadmium chloride, i.e. poly[bis(4‐arsonoanilinium) [tetra‐μ‐chlorido‐cadmate(II)]], {(C₆H₉AsNO₃)₂[CdCl₄]}_n , (IV), have been determined. In (II), the two 4‐arsonoanilinium cations are accompanied by [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cations with sulfate anions. In the isotypic complex salts (III) and (IV), they act as counter‐cations to the {[CuCl₄]²⁻}_n or {[CdCl₄]²⁻}_n anionic polymer sheets, respectively. In (II), the [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ ion sits on a crystallographic centre of symmetry and displays a slightly distorted octahedral coordination geometry. The asymmetric unit for (II) contains, in addition to half the [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ ion, one 4‐arsonoanilinium cation, a sulfate dianion and a solvent water molecule. Extensive O—H…O and N—H…O hydrogen bonds link all the species, giving an overall three‐dimensional structure. In (III), four of the chloride ligands are related by inversion [Cu—Cl = 2.2826 (8) and 2.2990 (9) Å], with the other two sites of the tetragonally distorted octahedral CuCl₆ unit occupied by symmetry‐generated Cl‐atom donors [Cu—Cl = 2.9833 (9) Å], forming a two‐dimensional coordination polymer network substructure lying parallel to (001). In the crystal, the polymer layers are linked across [001] by a number of bridging hydrogen bonds involving N—H…Cl interactions from head‐to‐head‐linked As—O—H…O 4‐arsonoanilinium cations. A three‐dimensional network structure is formed. Cd^II compound (IV) is isotypic with Cu^II complex (III), but with the central CdCl₆ complex repeat unit having a more regular M —Cl bond‐length range [2.5232 (12)–2.6931 (10) Å] compared to that in (III). This series of compounds represents the first reported crystal structures having the protonated 4‐arsonoanilinium species.     

Bis(μ‐hexa­methyl­enetetr­amine)­bis(aqua­di­bromo­cadmium)­di­aqua­di­bromo­cadmium dihydrate

The title compound, poly­[[di­aqua­di­bromo­cadmium‐μ‐(1,3,5,7‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]decane‐N¹:N⁵)‐aqua­cad­mium‐di‐μ‐bromo‐aqua­cadmium‐μ‐(1,3,5,7‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]decane‐N¹:N⁵)‐di‐μ‐bromo] dihydrate], [Cd₃­Br₆­(C₆­H₁₂­N₄)₂­(H₂O)₄]·­2H₂O, is made up of two‐dimensional neutral rectangular coordination layers. Each rectangular subunit is enclosed by a pair of Cd₃(μ₂‐Br)₆(H₂O)₃ fragments and a pair of (μ₂‐hmt)Cd(H₂O)₂Br₂(μ₂‐hmt) fragments as sides (hmt is hexa­methyl­enetetr­amine). The unique Cd^II atom in the Cd₂Br₂ ring in the Cd₃(μ₂‐Br)₆(H₂O)₃ fragment is in a slightly distorted octahedral CdNOBr₄ geometry, surrounded by one hmt ligand [2.433 (5) Å], one aqua ligand [2.273 (4) Å] and four Br atoms [2.6409 (11)–3.0270 (14) Å]. The Cd^II atom in the (μ₂‐hmt)Cd(H₂O)₂Br₂(μ₂‐hmt) fragment lies on an inversion center and is in a highly distorted octahedral CdN₂O₂Br₂ geometry, surrounded by two trans‐related N atoms of two hmt ligands [2.479 (5) Å], two trans‐related aqua ligands [2.294 (4) Å] and two trans‐related Br atoms [2.6755 (12) Å]. Adjacent two‐dimensional coordination sheets are connected into a three‐dimensional network by hydrogen bonds involving lattice water mol­ecules, and the aqua, bromo and hmt ligands belonging to different layers.     

Three isomorphous Ln complexes: {[Ln2(bt)6(bno)(H2O)4]·bno}n (bt is but‐2‐enoate and bno is 4,4′‐bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide), with Ln = Nd,Er and Y

The polymeric title compounds, namely catena‐poly[[[di‐μ‐but‐2‐enoato‐κ³O:O,O′;κ³O,O′:O′‐bis[diaquadibut‐2‐enoato‐κO;κ²O,O′‐neodymium(III)]]‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide‐κ²O:O′] 4,4′‐bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide solvate] and the erbium(III) and yttrium(III) analogues, {[Ln₂(C₄H₅O₂)₆(C₁₀H₈N₂O₂)(H₂O)₄]·C₁₀H₈N₂O₂}_n (Ln = Nd, Er and Y), form from [Ln₂(bt)₆(H₂O)₄] dimers (bt is but‐2‐enoate) bridged by 4,4′‐bipyridyl dioxide (bno) spacers into sets of parallel chains; these linear arrays are interconnected by aqua‐mediated hydrogen bonds into broad two‐dimensional structures, which in turn interact with each other though the hydrogen‐bonded bridged bno solvent units. Both independent bno units in the structures are bisected by symmetry centres.     

Two bismuth oxalate hydrates and revision of their chemical formulae

The crystal structures of two bismuth(III) oxalate hydrates, previously described as `Bi<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>·H<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>' and `Bi₂(C₂O₄)₃·7H₂O', were solved and refined from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data. The results led to the revised chemical formulae Bi₂(C₂O₄)₃·6H₂O and Bi₂(C₂O₄)₃·8H₂O, respectively. Both dibismuth(III) trioxalate hexahydrate (tetra­aqua­tri‐μ‐oxalato‐dibismuth(III) dihydrate, {[Bi₂(C₂O₄)₃(H₂O)₄]·2H₂O}_n) and dibismuth(III) trioxalate octahydrate (tetra­aqua­tri‐μ‐oxalato‐dibismuth(III) tetrahydrate {[Bi₂(C₂O₄)₃(H₂O)₄]·4H₂O}_n) are characterized by a three‐dimensional network of Bi atoms connected by tetradentate oxalate groups. All ligand and `free' water mol­ecules are located in channels and voids. The mean Bi—O bond lengths are ∼2.51 Å. The lone electron pairs on all Bi³⁺ cations are stereochemically inactive.     

AgI and CuI binuclear macrocyclic complexes with 1‐(3‐pyridyl)­ethano­ne oxime

Bis­[μ‐1‐(3‐pyridyl)­ethanone oxime‐κ²N:N′]­bis­[nitrato­sil­ver(I)], [Ag₂(NO₃)₂(C₇H₈N₂O)₂], crystallizes as a centrosymmetric binuclear macrocylic complex containing silver(I) ions bridged by the organic 1‐(3‐pyridyl)­ethanone oxime ligand. The ligand coordinates via the pyridine and the oxime N atoms. A similar metal–ligand arrangement was found in the copper(I) complex catena‐poly­[[bis­[μ‐1‐(3‐pyridyl)­ethano­ne oxime‐κ²N:N′]­dicopper(I)]‐di‐μ‐iodo], [Cu₂I₂(C₇H₈N₂O)₂]_n, but here the centrosymmetric macrocycles are connected by double anion bridges, resulting in the formation of a one‐dimensional coordination polymer.     

Three one‐dimensional coordination polymers based on 1,1′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)‐2,2′‐bi‐1H‐benzimidazole and HgX2 (X = Cl,Br and I)

A new 2,2′‐bi‐1H‐benzimidazole bridging organic ligand, namely 1,1′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)‐2,2′‐bi‐1H‐benzimidazole, C₂₆H₂₀N₆, L or (I), has been synthesized and used to create three new one‐dimensional coordination polymers, viz.catena‐poly[[dichloridomercury(II)]‐μ‐1,1′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)‐2,2′‐bi‐1H‐benzimidazole], [HgCl₂(C₂₆H₂₀N₆)]_n, (II), and the bromido, [HgBr₂(C₂₆H₂₀N₆)]_n, (III), and iodido, [HgI₂(C₂₆H₂₀N₆)]_n, (IV), analogues. Free ligand L crystallizes with two symmetry‐independent half‐molecules in the asymmetric unit and each L molecule resides on a crytallographic inversion centre. In structures (II)–(IV), the L ligand is also positioned on a crystallographic inversion centre, whereas the Hg centre resides on a crystallographic twofold axis. Compound (I) adopts an anti conformation in the solid state and forms a two‐dimensional network in the crystallographic bc plane viaπ–π and C—H...π interactions. The three Hg^II coordination complexes, (II)–(IV), have one‐dimensional zigzag chains composed of L and HgX₂ (X = Cl, Br and I), and the Hg^II centres are in a distorted tetrahedral [HgX₂N₂] coordination geometry. Complexes (III) and (IV) are isomorphous, whereas complex (II) displays an interesting conformational difference from the others, i.e. a twist in the flexible bridging ligand.     

Variation of hydrogen‐bonded networks in hexa­fluoro­phosphate salts of amidate‐bridged dirhodium(II,III) complexes with axial aqua ligands

In diaqua­tetra‐μ‐acetamidato‐κ⁴N:O;κ⁴O:N‐di­rhodium(II,III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Rh₂(C₂H₄NO)₄(H₂O)₂]PF₆, and diaqua­tetra‐μ‐acetamidato‐κ⁴N:O;κ⁴O:N‐di­rho­dium(II,III)hexa­fluoro­phosphate dihydrate, [Rh₂(C₂H₄NO)₄(H₂O)₂]PF₆·2H₂O, the cations and anions lie on inversion centers. Diaqua­tetra‐μ‐propionamidato‐κ⁴N:O;κ⁴O:N‐dirhodium(II,III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate dihydrate, [Rh₂(C₃H₆NO)₄(H₂O)₂]PF₆·2H₂O, and diaqua­tetra‐μ‐butyramidato‐κ⁴N:O;κ⁴O:N‐dirhodium(II,III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Rh₂(C₄H₈NO)₄(H₂O)₂]PF₆, crystallize with two crystallographically independent complexes that lie on inversion centers. In all of the structures, the dirhodium units are hydrogen bonded to one another. The hydrogen‐bonded networks vary with the alkyl substituents.     

Two new dimeric cadmium(II) and zinc(II) sulfate complexes with 2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine and 2,2:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine

The structures of two new sulfate complexes are reported, namely di‐μ‐sulfato‐κ³O,O′:O′′‐bis{aqua­[2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine‐κ³N¹,N²,N⁶]­cadmium(II)} tetra­hydrate, [Cd₂(SO₄)₂(C₁₆H₁₂N₆)₂(H₂O)₂]·4H₂O, and di‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′‐bis­[(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine‐κ³N¹,N^1′,N^1′′)­zinc(II)] dihydrate, [Cd₂(SO₄)₂(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)₂]·2H₂O, the former being the first report of a Cd(tpt) complex [tpt is 2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine]. Both compounds crystallize in the space group P and form centrosymmetric dimeric structures. In the cadmium complex, the metal center is heptacoordinated in the form of a pentagonal bipyramid, while in the zinc complex, the metal ion is in a fivefold environment, the coordination geometry being intermediate between square pyramidal and trigonal bipyramidal. Packing of the dimers leads to the formation of planar structures strongly linked by hydrogen bonding.     

A novel cadmium(II) coordination polymer containing two kinds of independent one‐dimensional chain

The structure of the title compound, catena‐poly[[cadmium(II)‐di‐μ‐chlorido‐μ‐(1,4‐diazoniabicyclo[2.2.2]octane‐1‐carboxylato)] [[aquachloridocadmium(II)]‐di‐μ‐chlorido] dihydrate], {[Cd(C₈H₁₅N₂O₂)Cl₂][CdCl₃(H₂O)]·2H₂O}_n, contains two kinds of independent one‐dimensional chain, viz. {[Cd(C₈H₁₅N₂O₂)Cl₂]⁺}_n and {[CdCl₃(H₂O)]⁻}_n, and uncoordinated water molecules. Each Cd^II cation in the {[Cd(C₈H₁₅N₂O₂)Cl₂]⁺}_n chain is octahedrally coordinated by two pairs of bridging chloride ligands and two O atoms from different bridging carboxylate groups. Cd^II cations in the {[CdCl₃(H₂O)]⁻}_n chain are also octahedrally surrounded by four bridging chloride ligands, one terminal chloride ligand and one coordinated water molecule. Hydrogen bonds between solvent water molecules and these two independent chains generate a three‐dimensional framework containing two‐dimensional zigzag layers.<!?tpb=18pt>     

Copper(II) bromide and copper(II) acetate complexes of 4,4′‐(p‐phenylene)bipyridazine

4,4′‐(p‐Phenylene)bipyridazine, C₁₄H₁₀N₄, (I), and the coordination compounds catena‐poly[[dibromidocopper(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐(p‐phenylene)bipyridazine‐κ²N²:N^2′], [CuBr₂(C₁₄H₁₀N₄)]_n, (II), and catena‐poly[[[tetrakis(μ‐acetato‐κ²O:O′)dicopper(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐(p‐phenylene)bipyridazine‐κ²N¹:N^1′] chloroform disolvate], {[Cu₂(C₂H₃O₂)₄(C₁₄H₁₀N₄)]·2CHCl₃}_n, (III), contain a new extended bitopic ligand. The combination of the p‐phenylene spacer and the electron‐deficient pyridazine rings precludes C—H...π interactions between the lengthy aromatic molecules, which could be suited for the synthesis of open‐framework coordination polymers. In (I), the molecules are situated across a center of inversion and display a set of very weak intermolecular C—H...N hydrogen bonds [3.399 (3) and 3.608 (2) Å]. In (II) and (III), the ligand molecules are situated across a center of inversion and act as N²,N^2′‐bidentate [in (II)] and N¹,N^1′‐bidentate [in (III)] long‐distance bridges between the metal ions, leading to the formation of coordination chains [Cu—N = 2.005 (3) Å in (II) and 2.199 (2) Å in (III)]. In (II), the copper ion lies on a center of inversion and adopts CuN₂Br₄ (4+2)‐coordination involving two long axial Cu—Br bonds [3.2421 (4) Å]. In (III), the copper ion has a tetragonal pyramidal CuO₄N environment. The uncoordinated pyridazine N atom and two acetate O atoms provide a multiple acceptor site for accommodation of a chloroform solvent molecule by trifurcated hydrogen bonding [C—H...O(N) = 3.298 (5)–3.541 (4) Å].     

Self‐Assembly of Discrete Copper(I)‐Halide Complexes with Diacylthioureas

Three diacylthioureas 1,4‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr]₂ (Ar = 2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) ( L¹ , 1 ), 1,3‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr]₂ ( L² , 2 ), and 1,3‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr′]₂ (Ar′ = 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃) ( L³ , 3 ) were synthesized and characterized. The Cu^I complexes from the reactions of bipodal ligands Lⁿ with CuX (X = Cl, Br, I) were structurally investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction methods. Treatment of L¹ with CuX gave the metallamacrocyclic complexes ( L¹ CuX)₂ [X = Cl ( 4 ), Br ( 5 ), I ( 6 )] with the ligand to metal in a ratio of 2:2, where both sulfur and halide anions function as terminal substituents. In contrast, when L² or L³ was reacted with CuBr, the two Lⁿ ligands coordinate to four copper atoms each in a bridging and terminal fashion to yield [ Lⁿ (CuBr)₂]₂ [n = 2 ( 7 ), 3 ( 8 )]. The obtained S₄Cu₄Br₄ core contains all four bromide anions in bridging positions. The reaction of L³ with CuX (X = Cl, I) gave the 3:3 trinuclear complexes ( L³ CuX)₃ [X = Cl ( 9 ) I ( 10 )], interconnected by halide bridges. The obtained diacylthioureas ( 1 – 3 ) and their Cu^I complexes ( 4 – 10 ) were also characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy.     

First‐row transition metal–pyridine (py)–sulfate [(py)xM](SO4) complexes (M = Ni,Cu and Zn): crystal field theory in action

The crystal structures of three first‐row transition metal–pyridine–sulfate complexes, namely catena‐poly[[tetrakis(pyridine‐κN)nickel(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′], [Ni(SO₄)(C₅H₅N)₄]_n, (1), di‐μ‐sulfato‐κ⁴O:O‐bis[tris(pyridine‐κN)copper(II)], [Cu₂(SO₄)₂(C₅H₅N)₆], (2), and catena‐poly[[tetrakis(pyridine‐κN)zinc(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′‐[bis(pyridine‐κN)zinc(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′], [Zn₂(SO₄)₂(C₅H₅N)₆]_n, (3), are reported. Ni compound (1) displays a polymeric crystal structure, with infinite chains of Ni^II atoms adopting an octahedral N₄O₂ coordination environment that involves four pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. Cu compound (2) features a dimeric molecular structure, with the Cu^II atoms possessing square‐pyramidal N₃O₂ coordination environments that contain three pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. Zn compound (3) exhibits a polymeric crystal structure of infinite chains, with two alternating zinc coordination environments, i.e. octahedral N₄O₂ coordination involving four pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands, and tetrahedral N₂O₂ coordination containing two pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. The observed coordination environments are consistent with those predicted by crystal field theory.