Kinetics of methyl methacrylate and n‐butyl acrylate copolymerization mediated by 2‐cyanoprop‐2‐yl dithiobenzoate as a RAFT agent

The RAFT (co)polymerization kinetics of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and n‐butyl acrylate (BA) mediated by 2‐cyanoprop‐2‐yl dithiobenzoate was studied with various RAFT concentrations and monomer compositions. The homopolymerization of MMA gave the highest rate. Increasing the BA fraction f_BA dramatically decreased the copolymerization rate. The rate reached the lowest point at f_MMA ～ 0.2. This observation is in sharp contrast to the conventional RAFT‐free copolymerization, where BA homopolymerization gave the highest rate and the copolymerization rate decreased monotonously with increasing f_MMA. This peculiar phenomenon can be explained by the RAFT retardation effect. The RAFT copolymerization rate can be described by 〈R_p〉/〈R_p〉₀ = (1 + 2(〈k_c〉/〈k_t〉)〈K〉)[RAFT]₀)^?0.5, where 〈R_p〉₀ is the RAFT‐free copolymerization rate and 〈K〉 is the apparent addition–fragmentation equilibrium coefficient. A theoretical expression of 〈K〉 based on a terminal model of addition and fragmentation reactions was derived and successfully applied to predict the RAFT copolymerization kinetics with the rate parameters obtained from the homopolymerization systems. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 3098–3111, 2007     

Homopolymerization and copolymerization of isocyanatoethyl methacrylate

This article describes the homopolymerization of isocyanatoethyl methacrylate (IEM) and its copolymerization with methyl methacrylate (MMA) in acetonitrile in the presence of 2,2′‐azobisisobutyronitrile. The constant characteristic of IEM polymerizability (k_p²/k_te = 128 × 10^?3 L mol^?1 s^?1, where k_p is the propagation constant and k_te is the termination constant) was determined. The study of IEM reactivity toward MMA gave ratios of 0.88 and 1.20 for IEM and MMA, respectively. The physicochemical properties of the IEM homopolymer and IEM/MMA copolymers were also studied. The glass‐transition temperature of poly(isocyanatoethyl methacrylate) was found to be 47 °C. From the thermogravimetric analysis of the weight‐loss percentage corresponding to the first wave of the thermogram, it was shown that the degradation mechanism of the IEM/MMA copolymers started from the isocyanate group. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 4762–4768, 2006     

Nitroxide‐mediated radical copolymerization of methyl methacrylate controlled with a minimal amount of 9‐(4‐vinylbenzyl)‐9H‐carbazole

The controlled nitroxide‐mediated homopolymerization of 9‐(4‐vinylbenzyl)‐9H‐carbazole (VBK) and the copolymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with varying amounts of VBK were accomplished by using 10 mol % {tert‐butyl[1‐(diethoxyphosphoryl)‐2,2‐dimethylpropyl]amino} nitroxide relative to 2‐({tert‐butyl[1‐(diethoxyphosphoryl)‐2,2‐dimethylpropyl]amino}oxy)‐2‐methylpropionic acid (BlocBuilder?) in dimethylformamide at temperatures from 80 to 125 °C. As little as 1 mol % of VBK in the feed was required to obtain a controlled copolymerization of an MMA/VBK mixture, resulting in a linear increase in molecular weight versus conversion with a narrow molecular weight distribution (M_w /M_n ≈ 1.3). Preferential incorporation of VBK into the copolymer was indicated by the MMA/VBK reactivity ratios determined: r_VBK = 2.7 ± 1.5 and r_MMA = 0.24 ± 0.14. The copolymers were found significantly “living” by performing subsequent chain extensions with a fresh batch of VBK and by ³¹P NMR spectroscopy analysis. VBK was found to be an effective controlling comonomer for NMP of MMA, and such low levels of VBK comonomer ensured transparency in the final copolymer. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Polymerization of 1,3‐dienes with functional groups. II. Free‐radical polymerization of N‐(2‐methylene‐3‐butenoyl)piperidine

The free‐radical homopolymerization and copolymerization behavior of N‐(2‐methylene‐3‐butenoyl)piperidine was investigated. When the monomer was heated in bulk at 60 °C for 25 h without an initiator, about 30% of the monomer was consumed by the thermal polymerization and the Diels–Alder reaction. No such side reaction was observed when the polymerization was carried out in a benzene solution with 1 mol % 2,2′‐azobisisobutylonitrile (AIBN) as an initiator. The polymerization rate equation was found to be R_p ∝ [AIBN]^0.507[M]^1.04, and the overall activation energy of polymerization was calculated to be 89.5 kJ/mol. The microstructure of the resulting polymer was exclusively a 1,4‐structure that included both 1,4‐E and 1,4‐Z configurations. The copolymerizations of this monomer with styrene and/or chloroprene as comonomers were carried out in benzene solutions at 60 °C with AIBN as an initiator. In the copolymerization with styrene, the monomer reactivity ratios were r₁ = 6.10 and r₂ = 0.03, and the Q and e values were calculated to be 10.8 and 0.45, respectively. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 1545–1552, 2003     

Cationic copolymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L,L‐lactide by an activated monomer mechanism

The cationic homopolymerization and copolymerization of L,L ‐lactide and ε‐caprolactone in the presence of alcohol have been studied. The rate of homopolymerization of ε‐caprolactone is slightly higher than that of L,L ‐lactide. In the copolymerization, the reverse order of reactivities has been observed, and L,L ‐lactide is preferentially incorporated into the copolymer. Both the homopolymerization and copolymerization proceed by an activated monomer mechanism, and the molecular weights and dispersities are controlled {number‐average degree of polymerization = ([M]₀ ? [M]_t)/[I]₀, where [M]₀ is the initial monomer concentration, [M]_t is the monomer concentration at time t, and [I]₀ is the initial initiator concentration; weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight ～1.1–1.3}. An analysis of ¹³C NMR spectra of the copolymers indicates that transesterification is slow in comparison with propagation, and the microstructure of the copolymers is governed by the relative reactivity of the comonomers. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 7071–7081, 2006     

A polarity‐activation strategy for the high incorporation of 1‐alkenes into functional copolymers via RAFT copolymerization

A new synthetic methodology for the preparation of copolymers having high incorporation of 1‐alkene together with multifunctionalities has been developed by polarity‐activated reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) copolymerization. This approach provides well‐defined alternating poly(1‐decene‐alt‐maleic anhydride), expanding the monomer types for living copolymerizations. Although neither 1‐decene (DE) nor maleic anhydride (MAn) has significant reactivity in RAFT homopolymerization, their copolymers have been synthesized by RAFT copolymerizations. The controlled characteristics of DE‐MAn copolymerizations were verified by increased copolymer molecular weights during the copolymerization process. Ternary copolymers of DE and MAn, with high conversion of DE, could be obtained by using additive amounts (5 mol %) of vinyl acetate or styrene (ST), demonstrating further enhanced monomer reactivities and complex chain structures. When ST was selected as the third monomer, copolymers with block structures were obtained, because of fast consumption of ST in the copolymerization. Moreover, a wide variety of well‐defined multifunctional copolymers were prepared by RAFT copolymerizations of various functional 1‐alkenes with MAn. For each copolymerization, gel permeation chromatography analysis showed that the resulting copolymer had well‐controlled M_n values and fairly low polydispersities (PDI = 1.3–1.4), and ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies indicated strong alternating tendency during copolymerization with high incorporation of 1‐alkene units, up to 50 mol %. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 3488–3498, 2008     

Copolymerization of n‐butylacrylate with methylmethacrylate by a novel photoinitiator, 1‐(bromoacetyl)pyrene

The photopolymerization efficiency of pyrene (Py), 1‐acetylpyrene (AP), and 1‐(bromoacetyl)pyrene (BP) for copolymerization of n‐butylacrylate (BA) with methylmethacrylate (MMA) was compared. A kinetic study of solution copolymerization in DMSO at 30 ± 0.2°C showed that the Py could not initiate copolymerization even after 20 h, whereas with AP as initiator, less than 1% conversion was observed. However, introduction of a Br in α‐methyl group of AP significantly enhanced the percent conversion. The kinetics and mechanism of copolymerization of BA with MMA using BP as photoinitiator have been studied in detail. The system follows nonideal kinetics (R_p α [BP]^0.67[BA]¹[MMA]^0.98), and degradative solvent transfer reasonably explains these kinetic nonidealities. The monomer reactivity ratios (MRRs) of MMA and BA have been estimated by the Finemann–Ross and Kelen–Tudos methods, by analyzing copolymer compositions determined by ¹H‐NMR spectra. The values of r₁ (MMA) and r₂ (BA) were found to be 2.17 and 0.44, respectively, which suggested the high concentration of alternating sequences in the random copolymers obtained. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 39: 261–267, 2007     

Reversible addition–fragmentation transfer (RAFT) copolymerization of methyl methacrylate and styrene in miniemulsion

In the reversible addition–fragmentation transfer (RAFT) copolymerization of two monomers, even with the simple terminal model, there are two kinds of macroradical and two kinds of polymeric RAFT agent with different R groups. Because the structure of the R group could exert a significant influence on the RAFT process, RAFT copolymerization may behave differently from RAFT homopolymerization. The RAFT copolymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and styrene (St) in miniemulsion was investigated. The performance of the RAFT copolymerization of MMA/St in miniemulsion was found to be dependent on the feed monomer compositions. When St is dominant in the feed monomer composition, RAFT copolymerization is well controlled in the whole range of monomer conversion. However, when MMA is dominant, RAFT copolymerization may be, in some cases, out of control in the late stage of copolymerization, and characterized by a fast increase in the polydispersity index (PDI). The RAFT process was found to have little influence on composition evolution during copolymerization. The synthesis of the well‐defined gradient copolymers and poly[St‐b‐(St‐co‐MMA)] block copolymer by RAFT miniemulsion copolymerization was also demonstrated. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 6248–6258, 2004     

Vinylhydroquinone. IV. Preparation and polymerization behavior of 2-methyl-5-vinylhydroquinone derivatives

As in the case of vinylhydroquinone (I), its alkyl-substituted derivative, 2-methyl-5-vinylhydroquinone (II) was found to copolymerize with methyl methacrylate by tri-n-butylborane in cyclohexanone at 30°C. II was prepared from the O,O′-bisether compound, 2-methyl-5-vinyl-O,O′-bis(1′-ethoxyethyl)hydroquinone (III). The monomer reactivity ratios (M₂ = II) were determined to be r₁ = 0.37 and r₂ = 0. No homopolymerization proceeded under the same conditions. Ordinary free-radical initiators, such as azobisisobutyronitrile and benzoyl peroxide, were not effective in the homopolymerization of II. 1:1 Copolymers were obtained from II and maleic anhydride by using tri-n-butylborane as an initiator. The copolymers exhibited no definite melting range and decomposed at 370–375°C endothermally (DSC). The polymerization behavior of III was also investigated. Although tri-n-butylborane did not initiate the homopolymerization of the monomer, azobisisobutyronitrile was capable of initiating the homopolymerization and copolymerization of III. The monomer reactivity ratios (M₁ = styrene) were determined to be r₁ = 0.83 and r₂ = 0.18. The ratios gave the following Q and e values; Q = 0.15 and e = ?2.2.     

Alternating copolymerization of 1- and 2-vinylnaphthalene with methyl methacrylate by using diethylaluminum chloride

The alternating copolymerization of 1- and 2-vinylnaphthalene (1-VNap and 2-VNap) with methyl methacrylate (MMA) by using diethylaluminum chloride (Et₂AlCl) in toluene at 0°C has been studied. No polymerization could occur without Et₂AlCl, and alternating copolymers were obtained only when an equimolar amount of Et₂AlCl with MMA was supplied. Through ¹H-NMR analyses on both dyad and triad of alternating deuterated 1- and 2-α-d-VNap–MMA copolymers, each configuration could be described successfully by a single parameter, coisotacticity σ, whose value was estimated as 0.41 for the former and 0.56 for the latter copolymer, respectively. A rather low coisotacticity of copoly(1-VNap–MMA) was explained in the terms of steric effect (peri effect) of 1-VNap monomer.     

4-甲基丙烯酸-2,2,6,6-四甲基哌啶醇酯自由基聚合的研究

<正> 带受阻胺基团的聚合物是一类新型光稳定剂,这类聚合物的合成研究已有一些报道,但是关于单体分子中的亚胺基对自由基聚合影响报道各不相同。 本文用偶氮二异丁腈(AIBN)为引发剂,对4-甲基丙烯酸-2,2,6,6-四甲基哌啶醇酯(MTMP)的均聚及其与苯乙烯(St)的共聚合进行了研究,同时也考察了MTMP的母体化合物4-羟基-2,2,6,6-四甲基哌啶(TMP)对St及甲基丙烯酸甲酯(MMA)聚合的影响,并对St-MTMP共聚合体系中介质的影响进行了初步探讨。     

Hydrophilic and hydrophobic copolymer systems based on acrylic derivatives of pyrrolidone and pyrrolidine

This article deals with the synthesis of hydrophilic methacrylic monomers derived from ethyl pyrrolidone [2‐ethyl‐(2‐pyrrolidone) methacrylate (EPM)] and ethyl pyrrolidine [2‐ethyl‐(2‐pyrrolidine) methacrylate (EPyM)] and their respective homopolymers. For the determination of their reactivity in radical copolymerization reactions, both monomers were copolymerized with methyl methacrylate (MMA), the reactivity ratios being calculated by the application of linear and nonlinear mathematical methods. EPM and MMA had ratios of r_EPM = 1.11 and r_MMA = 0.76, and this indicated that EPM with MMA had a higher reactivity in radical copolymerization processes than vinyl pyrrolidone (VP; r_VP = 0.005 and r_MMA = 4.7). EPyM and MMA had reactivity ratios of r_EPyM = 1.31 and r_MMA = 0.92, and this implied, as for the EPM–MMA copolymers, a tendency to form random or Bernoullian copolymers. The glass‐transition temperatures of the prepared copolymers were determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and were found to adjust to the Fox equation. Total‐conversion copolymers were prepared, and their behavior in aqueous media was found to be dependent on the copolymer composition. The swelling kinetics of the copolymers followed water transport mechanism case II, which is the most desirable kinetic behavior for a swelling controlled‐release material. Finally, the different states of water in the hydrogels—nonfreezing water, freezing bound water, and unbound freezing water—were determined by DSC and found to be dependent on the hydrophilic and hydrophobic units of the copolymers. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 395–407, 2003     

Synthesis and polymerization of fluorinated monomers bearing a reactive lateral group. XIV. Radical copolymerization of vinylidene fluoride with methyl 1,1‐dihydro‐4,7‐dioxaperfluoro‐5,8‐dimethyl non‐1‐enoate

The radical copolymerization in solution of vinylidene fluoride (VDF; or 1,1‐difluoroethylene) with methyl 1,1‐dihydro‐4,7‐dioxaperfluoro‐5,8‐dimethyl non‐1‐enoate (MDP) initiated by di‐tert‐butyl peroxide is presented. Six copolymerization reactions were investigated with initial [VDF]₀/[MDP]₀ molar ratios of 35/65 to 80/20. Both of these comonomers copolymerized in this range of copolymerization. Moreover, these comonomers homopolymerized separately under these conditions. The copolymer compositions of these random copolymers were calculated by means of ¹⁹F NMR spectroscopy, which allowed the quantification of the respective amounts of each monomeric unit in the copolymers. The Tidwell–Mortimer method was used for the assessment of the reactivity ratios (r_i) of both comonomers, which showed a higher incorporation of MDP in the copolymers (r_MDP = 2.41 ± 2.28 and r_VDF = 0.38 ± 0.21 at 120 °C). The Alfrey–Price Q and e values of the trifluoroallyl monomer MDP were calculated to be 0.024 (from Q_VDF = 0.008) or 0.046 (from Q_VDF = 0.015) and 0.70 (vs e_VDF = 0.40) or 0.80 (vs e_VDF = 0.50), respectively, indicating that MDP was an electron‐accepting monomer. The thermal properties of these fluorinated copolymers were also determined. Except for those containing a high amount of VDF, the copolymers were amorphous. Each showed one glass‐transition temperature (T_g) only, and with known laws of T_g's, T_g of the MDP homopolymer was assessed. It was compared to that obtained from the direct radical homopolymerization of MDP and discussed. Indeed, these two values were close (T_g = ?3 °C). Thermogravimetric analyses were performed, and they showed that the copolymers were rather thermostable because the thermal degradation occurred at 280 °C. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 3109–3121, 2003     

Stereospecific styrene polymerization and ethylene–styrene copolymerization with titanocenes containing a pendant amine donor

A series of monocyclopentadienyl titanium complexes containing a pendant amine donor on a Cp group ( A = CpTiCl₃, B = Cp^NTiCl₃, C = Cp^NTiCl₂TEMPO, for Cp = C₅H₅, Cp^N = C₅H₄CH₂CH₂N(CH₃)₂, and TEMPO = 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidine‐N‐oxyl) are investigated for styrene homopolymerization and ethylene–styrene (ES) copolymerization. When activated by methylaluminoxane at 70 °C, complexes with the amine group ( B and C ) are active for styrene homopolymerization and afford syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS). The copolymerizations of ethylene and styrene with B and C yield high‐molecular weight ES copolymer, whereas complex A yields mixtures of sPS and polyethylene, revealing the critical role that the pendant amine has on the polymerization behavior of the complexes. Fractionation, NMR, and DSC analyses of the ES copolymers generated from B and C suggest that they contain sPS. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 1579–1585, 2010     

Copolymers from Castor Oil Prepolymers (COP). 4. Copolymerization of Methyl Methacrylate with COP

The copolymerization of castor oil prepolymer (COP) with methyl methacrylate (MMA) has been accomplished at 75°C using a free radical initiator. The monomer reactivity ratios of MMA (r₁) and COP (r₂) were determined to be r₁ = 3.04 and r₂ = 0.605. With an increasing concentration of COP in the binary mixture, copolymers with decreasing molecular weight were obtained. The copolymers obtained were powdery substances soluble in many organic solvents.     

Polymerization behavior of 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl m-isopropenyl-α,α-dimethylbenzyl carbamate

Copolymers of 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl m-isopropenyl-α,α-dimethylbenzyl carbamate (CB) with styrene (S) and with methyl methacrylate (MMA) were synthesized using AIBN as initiator. S–CB copolymers made from feed ranging from 0.45–0.94 mole fractions S and MMA-CB copolymers made from feed of 0.34–0.88 mole fractions MMA were used to determine the monomer reactivity ratios r₁ and r₂. The structure of S–CB copolymers was inferred to be mainly of a random nature and in the MMA–CB copolymerization system there is a stronger tendency to form alternating copolymers. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Ru(II)‐mediated living radical polymerization: block and random copolymerizations of N,N‐dimethylacrylamide and methyl methacrylate

RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ led to living radical copolymerization of N,N‐dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) in conjunction with a halide‐initiator (R‐X; CHCl₂COPh, CCl₃Br) and Al(Oi‐Pr)₃ in toluene at 80°C. Both the monomers were polymerized at almost the same rate into random copolymers, where the number‐average molecular weights (M_n) increased in direct proportion to weight of the obtained polymers, and the molecular weight distributions (MWDs) were narrow throughout the reactions (M_w/M_n = 1.2‐1.6). MMA was consumed faster in the copolymerization than in the homopolymerization, which was due to the interaction of DMAA with the ruthenium complex. The Ru(II)‐based initiating system was also effective in block copolymerization of DMAA and MMA.     

Atom transfer radical copolymerization of n‐hexylmaleimide and styrene in an ionic liquid

Dendritic polyarylether 2‐bromoisobutyrates of different generations (Gn‐Br, n = 1–3) as macroinitiators for the atom transfer radical copolymerization of N‐hexylmaleimide and styrene in an ionic liquid, 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, were investigated. The copolymerization carried out in the ionic liquid with CuBr/pentamethyldiethylenetriamine as a catalyst at room temperature afforded polymers with well‐defined molecular weights and low polydispersities (1.18 < M_w/M_n < 1.36, where M_w is the weight‐average molecular weight and M_n is the number‐average molecular weight), and the resultant copolymers possessed an alternating structure over a wide range of monomer feeds (f₁ = 0.3–0.8). Meanwhile, the copolymerization was also conducted in anisole at 110 °C under similar conditions so that the effect of the reaction media on the polymerization could be evaluated. The monomer reactivity ratios showed that the tendency to form alternating copolymers for the two monomers was stronger in ionic liquids than in anisole. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 3360–3366, 2002     

Novel amorphous perfluorocopolymeric system: Copolymers of perfluoro‐2‐methylene‐1,3‐dioxolane derivatives

Perfluorotetrahydro‐2‐methylene‐furo[3,4‐d][1,3]dioxole (monomer I ) and perfluoro‐2‐methylene‐4‐methoxymethyl‐1,3‐dioxolane (monomer II ) are soluble in perfluorinated or partially fluorinated solvents and readily polymerize in solution or in bulk when initiated by a free‐radical initiator, perfluorodibenzoyl peroxide. The copolymerization parameters have been determined with in situ ¹⁹F NMR measurements. The copolymerization reactivity ratios are r _I = 1.80 and r _II = 0.80 in 1,1,2‐trichlorotrifluoroethane at 41 °C and r _I = 0.97 and r _II = 0.85 for the bulk polymerization. These data show that this copolymerization pair has a good copolymerization tendency and yields nearly ideal random copolymers. The copolymers have only one glass‐transition temperature from 101 to 168 °C, depending on the copolymer compositions. Melting endotherms have not been observed in their differential scanning calorimetry traces, and this indicates that all the copolymers with different compositions are completely amorphous. These copolymers are thermally stable (the initial decomposition temperatures are higher than 350 °C under an N₂ atmosphere) and have low refractive indices and high optical transparency from UV to near‐infrared. Copolymer films prepared by casting were flexible and tough. These properties make the copolymers ideal candidates as optical and electrical materials. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 1613–1618, 2006     

Facile synthesis of blocky styrene(1,3)‐butadiene copolymers having stereoregular monomeric sequences

Half titanocenes (CpCH₂CH₂O)TiCl₂ 1 and (CpCH₂CH₂ OCH₃)TiCl₃ 2 , activated by methylaluminoxane are tested in styrene–1,3‐butadiene copolymerization. The titanocene 1 is able to copolymerize styrene and 1,3‐butadiene, with a facile procedure, to give products with high molecular weight. The analysis of microstructure by ¹³C‐NMR reveals that the styrene homosequences in copolymers are in syndiotactic arrangement, while the butadiene homosequences are, prevailingly, in 1,4‐cis configuration, according with behavior of 1 in the homopolymerizations of styrene and 1,3‐butadiene, respectively. The reactivity ratios of copolymerization are estimated by diad composition analysis. All obtained copolymers have r₁ × r₂ values much larger than 1, indicating blocky nature of homosequences. The structural characterization by wide‐angle X‐ray powder diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry indicates that all copolymers are crystalline, with T_m varying from 171 to 239 °C, depending on the styrene content. The titanocene 2 did not succeed in styrene–1,3‐butadiene copolymerization, giving rise to a blend of homopolymers. Compounds 1 and 2 were also tested in the polymerization of several conjugated dienes, and the obtained results were very useful to rationalize the behavior of both catalysts in the copolymerization of styrene and butadiene. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 815–822, 2010