Acid-Catalyzed [3,3]-Sigmatropic Rearrangements of N-Propargylanilines

The acid-catalyzed rearrangement of N-(1′,1′-dimethylprop-2′-ynyl)-, N-(1′-methylprop-2′-ynyl)-, and N-(1′-arylprop-2′-ynyl)-2,6-, 2,4,6-, 2,3,5,6-, and 2,3,4,5,6-substituted anilines in mixtures of 1N aqueous H₂SO₄ and ROH such as EtOH, PrOH, BuOH etc., or in CDCl₃ or CCl₄ in the presence of 4 to 9 mol-equiv. trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)has been investigated (cf. Scheme 12-25 and Tables 6 and 7). The rearrangement of N-(3′-X-1′,1′-dimethyl-prop-2′-ynyl)-2,6- and 2,4,6-trimethylanilines (X = Cl, Br, I) in CDCl₃/TFA occurs already at 20° with τ_1/2 of ca. 1 to 5 h to yield the corresponding 6-(1-X-3′-methylbuta-1,2′-dienyl)-2,6-dimethyl- or 2,4,6-trimethylcyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-iminium ions (cf. Scheme 13 and Footnotes 26 and 34) When the 4 position is not substituted, a consecutive [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement takes place to yield 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3′-X-1′,1′-dimethylprop-2′-ynyl)anilines (cf. Footnotes 26 and 34). A comparable behavior is exhibited by N-(3′-chloro-1′-phenylprop-2′-ynyl)-2,6-dimethylaniline ( 45 ., cf. Table 7). The acid-catalyzed rearrangement of the anilines with a Cl substituent at C(3′) in 1N aqueous H₂SO₄/ROH at 85-95°, in addition, leads to the formation of 7-chlorotricyclo[3.2.1.0^2,7]oct-3-en-8-ones as the result of an intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction of the primarily formed iminium ions followed by hydrolysis of the iminium function (or vice versa; cf. Schemes 13,23, and 25 as well as Table 7). When there is no X substituent at C(1′) of the iminium-ion intermediate, a [1,2]-sigmatropic shift of the allenyl moiety at C(6) occurs in competition to the [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement to yield the corresponding 3-allenyl-substituted anilines (cf. Schemes 12,14–18, and 20 as well as Tables 6 and 7). The rearrangement of (?)?(S)-N-(1′-phenylprop-2′-ynyl)-2,6-dimethylaniline ((?)- 38 ; cf. Table 7) in a mixture of 1N H₂SO₄/PrOH at 86° leads to the formation of (?)-(R)-3-(3′-phenylpropa-1′,2′-dienyl)-2,6-dimethylaniline ((?)- 91 ), (+)-(E)- and (?)-(Z)-6-benzylidene-1,5-dimethyltricyclo[3.2.1.0^2′7]oct-3-en-8-one ((+)-(E)- and (?)-(Z)- 92 , respectively), and (?)-(S)-2,6-dimethyl-4-( 1′-phenylprop-2′-ynyl)aniline((?)- 93 ). Recovered starting material (10%) showed a loss of 18% of its original optical purity. On the other hand, (+)-(E)- and (?)-(Z)- 92 showed the same optical purity as (minus;)- 38 , as expected for intramolecular concerted processes. The CD of (+)-(E)- and (?)-(Z)- 92 clearly showed that their tricyclic skeletons possess enantiomorphic structures (cf. Fig. 1). Similar results were obtained from the acid-catalyzed rearrangement of (?)-(S)-N-(3′-chloro-1′phenylprop-2′-ynyl)-2,6-dimethylaniline ((?)- 45 ; cf. Table 7). The recovered starting material exhibited in this case a loss of 48% of its original optical purity, showing that the Cl substituent favors the heterolytic cleavage of the N–C(1′) bond in (?)- 45. A still higher degree (78%) of loss of optical activity of the starting aniline was observed in the acid-catalyzed rearrangement of (?)-(S)-2,6-dimethyl-N-[1′-(p-tolyl)prop-2′-ynyl]aniline ((?)- 42 ; cf. Scheme 25). N-[1′-(p-anisyl)prop-2-ynyl]-2,4,6-trimethylaniline( 43 ; cf. Scheme 25) underwent no acid-catalyzed [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement at all. The acid-catalyzed rearrangement of N-(1′,1′-dimethylprop-2′-ynyl)aniline ( 25 ; cf. Scheme 10) in 1N H₂SO₄/BuOH at 100° led to no product formation due to the sensitivity of the expected product 53 against the reaction conditions. On the other hand, the acid-catalyzed rearrangement of the corresponding 3′-Cl derivative at 130° in aqueous H₂SO₄ in ethylene glycol led to the formation of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,2-dimethylquinolin-4-on ( 54 ; cf. Scheme 10), the hydrolysis product of the expected 4-chloro-1,2-dihydro-2,2-dimethylquinoline ( 56 ). Similarly, the acid-catalyzed rearrangement of N-(3′-bromo-1′-methylprop-2′-ynyl)-2,6-diisopropylaniline ( 37 ; cf. Scheme 21) yielded, by loss of one i-Pr group, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-8-isopropyl-2-methylquinolin-4-one ( 59 ).     

Mechanismus der photochemischen Methanol-Addition an 2-allylierte Aniline

Mechanism of the Photochemical Addition of Methanol to 2-Allylated Anilines We studied in methanol the photoreaction of the 2-allylated anilines, given in Scheme 3 (cf. also [ 1 ]). Irradiation of N-methyl-2-(1′-methylallyl)aniline ( 15 ) with a high pressure mercury lamp yielded trans- and cis-1,2,3-trimethylindoline (trans- and (cis- 34 ) as well as erythro- and threo-2-(2′-methoxy-1′-methylpropyl)-N-methylaniline (erythro- and threo- 35 ; Scheme 7). When the corresponding aniline d₃- 15 , specifically deuterated in the 1′-methyl group, was irradiated in methanol, a mixture of trans- and cis-d₃- 34 , and of erythro- and threo-d₃- 35 was obtained. Successive dehydrogenation of the mixture of cis/trans-d₃- 34 by Pd/C in boiling xylene and by MnO₂ in boiling benzene lead to the corresponding indole d₃- 36 (cf. Scheme 9), the ¹H- and ²H-NMR. spectra of which showed that both cis-d₃- and trans-d₃- 34 had bound the deuterium labeled methyl group exclusively at C(3). The ¹H- and ²H-NMR. analyses of the separated methanol addition products revealed that erythro-d₃- 35 contained the deuterium label to at least 95% in the methyl group at C(1′), and threo-d₃- 35 to 50% in CH₃? C(1′) and to 50% in CH₃? C(2′) (cf. Scheme 9). To confirm these results 2-(1′-ethylallyl)aniline ( 16 ) was irradiated in methanol, whereby a complex mixture of at least 6 products was obtained (cf. Scheme 11). Two products were identified as trans- and cis-3-ethyl-2-methylindoline (trans- and cis- 37 ). The four other products represented erythro- and threo-2-(1′-ethyl-2′-methoxypropyl)aniline (erythro- and threo- 39 ) as major components, and erythro- and threo-2-(2′-methoxy-1′-methylbutyl)aniline (erythro- and threo- 40 ). These results clearly demonstrate that the methanol addition products must arise from spirodienimine intermediates of the type of trans- 9 and cis- 11 (R¹ = CD₃ or C₂H₅, R² = CH₃ or H; Scheme 2) which are opened solvolytically with inversion of configuration by methanol. Thus, cis- 11 (R¹ = CD₃, R² = CH₃) must lead to a 1:1 mixture of threo- 13 and threo- 14 (i.e.) a 1:1 distribution of the deuterium labelled methyl group between C(1′) and C(2′) in threo- 35 ) The formation of erythro-d₃- 35 with at least 95% of the deuterium label in the methyl group at C(1′) indicates that trans- 9 (R¹ = CD₃, R² = CH₃) reacts with methanol regioselectively (> 95%) at the C(2), C(3) bond. Similarly, the formation of the methanol addition products in the photoreaction of 16 (Scheme 11) can be explained. Since the indolines, formed in both photoreactions, show no alteration in the position of the subsituent at C(1′) with respect to the starting material we suppose that the diradical 7 (R¹ = CD₃ or C₂H₅, R² = CH₃ or H; Scheme 2) is a common intermediate which undergoes competetive 1.3 and 1.5 ring closure yielding the spirodienimines and the indolines. This conception is supported by irradiation experiments with N, 3,5-trimethyl-2-(1′-methylally)aniline ( 17 ) and 2-(2′-cyclohexenyl)-N-methylaniline ( 18 ) in methanol. In the former case the formation of spirodienimines is hindered by the methyl group at C(3) for steric reasons, thus leading to a ratio of the indoline to the methoxy compounds of about 6.3 as compared with ca. 1.0 for 15 (cf. Scheme 12). On the other hand, no methoxy compounds could be detected in the reaction mixture of 18 (cf. Scheme 13) which indicates that in this case the 1.3 ring closure cannot compete with the 1.5 cyclization in the corresponding cyclic diradical of the type 7 (R¹–C(1′)–C(2′) is part of a six-membered ring; Scheme 2). We suppose that the diradicals of type 7 are formed by proton transfer in an intramolecular electron-donor-acceptor (EDA) complex arising from the excited single state of the aniline chromophor and the allylic side chain. This idea is supported by the fluorescence specta of 2-allylated N-methylanilines (cf. Fig.1-4) which show pronounced differences with respect to the corresponding 2-alkylated anilines. Furthermore, the anilines 18 and 20 when irradiated in methanol in the presence of an excess of trans-1,3-pentadiene undergo preferentially an intermolecular addition to the diene, thus yielding the N-(1′-methyl-2′-butenyl)anilines 52 and 51 , respectively (Scheme 15), i.e. as one would expect the diene with its low lying LUMO is a better partner for an EDA complex than the double bond of the allylic side chain.     

Solvothermal synthesis,structure, and luminescence of a 3-D Cd(II) complex assembled with biphenyl-2,5,2′,5′-tetracarboxylic acid involving in situ ligand reaction

A 3-D metal-organic framework [Cd₃(L)₂(DMF)₂]?·?2H₂O?·?2DMF (1) (H₃L?=?2-(dimethylcarbamoyl)biphenyl-5,2′,5′-tricarboxylic acid, DMF?=?N,N-dimethylformamide) with trinuclear Cd(II) units has been prepared. Complex 1 is a (3,?6)-connected (4²?·?6)₂(4⁴?·?6²?·?8⁸?·?10) coordination net, which results from the solvothermal in situ formation of a new asymmetric ligand, 2-(dimethylcarbamoyl)biphenyl-5,2′,5′-tricarboxylic acid (H₃L), through amidation of biphenyl-2,5,2′,5′-tetracarboxylic acid (H₄bptc). Additionally, the luminescence of 1 has been investigated.     

Umlagerungsreaktionen von (2′-Propinyl)cyclohexadienolen und -semibenzolen

Rearrangements of (2′-Propinyl)cyclohexadienols and -semibenzenes The acid-catalyzed dienol-benzene rearrangement of 3- and 5-methyl-substituted (2′-propinyl)cyclohexadienols has been investigated. Treatment of the dienols with CF₃COOH in CCl₄ yields allenyl- and (2′-propinyl)benzenes via [3,4]- and [1,2]-sigmatropic rearrangements, respectively. The reaction with H₂SO₄ in Et₂O leeds to a mixture of allenyl-, 2′-propinyl-, 3′-butinyl- and (2′,3′-butadienyl)benzenes (Scheme 3). The latter are products of a thermal semibenzene-benzene rearrangement (cf. Scheme 9). The corresponding semibenzenes have been prepared by dehydration of the cyclohexadienols with H₂SO₄ or POCl₃ (Schemes 6 and 7). Under acidic conditions, the p-(2′-propinyl)semibenzenes 33–35 (Scheme 8) undergo [3,4]- and [1,2]-sigmatropic rearrangements to give again allenyl- and (2′-propinyl)benzenes, whereas the thermal rearrangements to the 3′-butinyl- and (2′,3′-butadienyl)benzenes (Scheme 9) involves a radical mechanism. In contrast, the o-(2′-propinyl)semibenzene b (Scheme 7) leads to (2′,3′-butadienyl)benzene 32 via a thermal [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement.     

Säurekatalysierte Umlagerung von 4-Allyl-cyclohex-2-en-1-olen; Beispiele für ladungskontrollierte [3s, 4s]-Umlagerungen von cyclischen Allylkationen

The acid-catalysed rearrangement of the cyclohex-2-en-1-ols 15 , d₃- 15 , 16 , 17 and 19 , the cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ols 20 and 21 , and also the allyl alcohols 22 and 23 (Scheme 3), using 98-percent sulfuric acid/acetic anhydride 1:99 at room temperature, was investigated. From the rearrangement of 4-allyl-4-phenyl-cyclohex-2-en-1-ol ( 15 ), with reaction times greater than 2 hours a single product is obtained, 4-allyl-biphenyl ( 50 ) in 33% yield (Scheme 9). With reaction times below 2 hours the acetate 53 from 15 was isolated, and this could be converted into 50 . The reaction of 2′,3′,3′-d₃-15 in Ac₂O/H₂SO₄ lead to 1′,1′,2′-d₃-50 (Scheme 11). The rearrangement of 4-allyl-4-methyl-cyclohex-2-en-1-ol (16) (Scheme 14) yielded 39% of the corresponding acetate 60 and 30% of 4-allyl-toluene ( 6 ), which also resulted by a rearrangement of 60 under the reaction conditions. These rearrangements are all [3s,4s]-sigmatropic reactions, which proceed via the cyclohexenyl cation a (Scheme 12, R = C₆H₅, CH₃). In Ac₂O/H₂SO₄ the allyl-cyclohexadienes primarely formed subsequently undergo dehydrogenation to yield the benzene derivatives 6 , 50 and d₃- 50 . From the rearrangement of 4,4-diphenyl-cyclohex-2-en-1-ol ( 19 ) at 0° a reaction mixture is obtained which consists of the acetate 55 , 2,3-diphenyl-cyclohexa-1,4-diene ( 57 ) and o-terphenyl ( 56 ) (Scheme 10). Both 55 and 57 are converted under the reaction conditions to o-terphenyl ( 56 ). No 4-(1′-methylallyl)-biphenyl is obtained from the rearrangement of 4-crotyl-4-phenyl-cyclohex-2-en-1-ol ( 17 ). In this case, apart from the corresponding acetate 64 , a single product 5-(1′-acetoxyethyl)-1-phenyl-bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-2-ene ( 65 ) (Scheme 16) was obtained; under the reaction conditions the acetate 64 rearranges to 65 . The rearrangement of 4-allyl-4-phenyl-cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ol ( 20 ) gives, as expected, not only 4-allyl-biphenyl ( 50 ) but also 2- and 3-allyl-biphenyl ( 51 and 52 ) and biphenyl (Scheme 13). 4-Benzyl-4-methyl-cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ol (syn- and anti- 21 ) gave in Ac₂O/H₂SO₄ at 10° as rearrangement products 93% of 2-benzyltoluene ( 97 ) and 7% of 4-benzyl-toluene ( 98 ) (Scheme 21). Hence [1,4]-rearrangements in cyclohexadienyl cations, seems to occur only to a limited extent. The alicyclic alcohols 22 and 23 (Scheme 18) gave, in Ac₂O/H₂SO₄, as main product the corresponding acetates 73 and 75 , as well as small amounts of olefins 74 and 76 formed by dehydration i.e. [3,4]-rearrangements occur in these systems. Also no [3,4]-rearrangements were observed in solvents reactions of either 4,4-dimethyl-hepta-1, 6-dien-3-yl tosulate (79; see Scheme 19) or its corresponding alcohol 24.     

Synthesis of 3-(2-chloro-5-nitroanilino and 4-nitroanilino)-1-(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)-2-pyrazolin-5-ones

A new synthesis of 3-anilino-1-aryl-2-pyrazolin-5-ones in which the pyrazolinone ring is built via N? N bond formation is described. 2-Cyano-2′,4′,6′-trichloroacetanilide 1 was converted to imino ether hydrochloride 2 which was reacted with anilines in methanol to produce N-arylimino ether 3a,b. Reaction of these N-arylimino ethers with hydroxylamine gave N-arylamidoximes 4a,b . An 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one 6a was prepared from the N-arylamidoxime 4a and subjected to base-induced rearrangement. The desired 3-anilino-pyrazolinone 7a was obtained only in a very low yield. However, O-acetylation of the N-arylamidoximes 4a,b followed by acid-catalyzed ring closure and rearrangement in the presence of excess acetic anhydride gave a mixture of N-acetylanilinopyrazolinones (e.g. 10 ) and 4-acetyloxy-3-N-acetylanilinopyrazoles (e.g. 12 ) which upon acid hydrolysis afforded the 3-anilinopyrazolinones 7a,b in better yield.     

Reactions of 2′-oxo-1′,2′-dihydrospiro[cyclopropane-1,3′-indole]-2,2,3,3-tetracarbonitriles with nucleophiles

2′-Oxo-1′,2′-dihydrospiro[cyclopropane-1,3′-indole]-2,2,3,3-tetracarbonitriles reacted with oxygencentered nucleophiles to form addition products at the cyano groups with conservation of the three-membered ring. Reactions of the title compounds with alcohols required the presence of base catalyst, and the products, 2-amino-4,4-dialkoxy-2′-oxo-1′,2′-dihydrospiro[3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene-6,3′-indole]-1,5-dicarbonitriles, were converted into the corresponding 2-imino-2′,4-dioxospiro[3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-6,3′-indole]-1,5-dicarbonitriles and 2,2′,4-trioxospiro[3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-6,3′-indole]-1,5-dicarbonitriles by the action of acetic and sulfuric acids, respectively. The reactions with ketone oximes occurred in the absence of a catalyst, yielding 2-amino-4,4-bis(alkylideneaminooxy)-2′-oxo-1′,2′-dihydrospiro[3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene-6,3′-indole]-1,5-dicarbonitriles. The reactions with thiols, aliphatic amines, and anilines were accompanied by opening of the three-membered ring. In the reactions with triphenylphosphine and thiols 2-(2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-3-ylidene)malononitrile was obtained, while morpholine and N,N-dimethylaniline gave rise, respectively, to 3,3-diaryl-and 3,3-dimorpholino-1H-indol-2(3H)-ones and tri- and dicyanoethylene derivatives.     

Synthesis of spiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizines] by 1,3‐dipolar reactions between isatins,l‐proline and electron‐deficient alkenes

Two spiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine] derivatives have been synthesized in good yield with high regio‐ and stereospecificity using one‐pot reactions between readily available starting materials, namely l ‐proline, substituted 1H‐indole‐2,3‐diones and electron‐deficient alkenes. The products have been fully characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and crystal structure analysis. In (1′RS ,2′RS ,3SR ,7a′SR )‐2′‐benzoyl‐1‐hexyl‐2‐oxo‐1′,2′,5′,6′,7′,7a′‐hexahydrospiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine]‐1′‐carboxylic acid, C₂₈H₃₂N₂O₄, (I), the unsubstituted pyrrole ring and the reduced spiro‐fused pyrrole ring adopt half‐chair and envelope conformations, respectively, while in (1′RS ,2′RS ,3SR ,7a′SR )‐1′,2′‐bis(4‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5,7‐dichloro‐2‐oxo‐1′,2′,5′,6′,7′,7a′‐hexahydrospiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine], which crystallizes as a partial dichloromethane solvate, C₂₈H₂₀Cl₄N₂O₃·0.981CH₂Cl₂, (II), where the solvent component is disordered over three sets of atomic sites, these two rings adopt envelope and half‐chair conformations, respectively. Molecules of (I) are linked by an O—H…·O hydrogen bond to form cyclic R ₆⁶(48) hexamers of (S ₆) symmetry, which are further linked by two C—H…O hydrogen bonds to form a three‐dimensional framework structure. In compound (II), inversion‐related pairs of N—H…O hydrogen bonds link the spiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine] molecules into simple R ₂²(8) dimers.     

Zur Photochemie von 1, 2-Benzisoxazolen in stark saurer Lösung

On the Photochemistry of 1, 2-Benzisoxazoles in Strongly Acidic Solution The 1, 2-benzisoxazoles 1a, 1b and 1d when dissolved in 96% sulfuric acid and irradiated through a quartz filter with a mercury high-presure lamp yield, after work-up, mixtures of 2, 5- and 2, 3-dihydroxy-acylbenzenes ( 2 and 3 , respectively; cf. Schemes 1 and 3 and Table 1). Irradiation of 3, 5-dimethyl-1, 2-benzisoxazole ( 1c ) in 96% sulfuric acid leads to the formation of 2, 3-dihydroxy-5-methyl-acetophenone ( 3c ) in only 6% yield (cf. Table 1). It is assumed that the 1, 2-benzisoxazolium ions react in the excited singlet state by heterolytic cleavage of the N, O-bond to yield the corresponding aryl oxenium ions 7 in the singlet ground state (see Scheme 5). Reaction of 7 with HSO ₄ ? ions, present in 96% sulfuric acid, yields, after hydrolysis, the dihydroxy compounds 2 and 3 . Photolysis of 3-methyl-1, 2-benzisoxazole ( 1b ) in diluted sulfuric acid (0,5 to 9 M ) in methanol or water leads only to the formation of 2-amino-phenol ( 6 ; see Scheme 3), presumable via photo-isomerization of 1b to 2-methylbenzoxazole ( 5b ) which then is hydrolyzed to give 6 .     

Synthesis of diols containing nucleic acid bases and their polyesters

Preparation of four diols containing nucleic acid bases derived from 3-(thymin-1-yl)propanoic acid (3-TPA) and 3-(uracil-1-yl)propanoic acid (3-UPA), and the corresponding model polymers of polynucleotides with linear polyester backbone and nucleic acid base derivative as pendant side chains are described. N-(1′,3′-Dihydroxy-2′-methyl-2′-propyl)-3-(thymin-1-yl)propionamide ( VIa , 3-HMPTPA), N-(1′3′-dihydroxy-2′-methyl-2′-propyl)-3-(uracyl-1-yl)propionamide ( VIb , 3-HMPUPA) and their isomers, N(β,β-dihydroxyethyl)-3-(thymin-1-yl)propionamide ( VIIa , 3-HETPA), and N-(β,β-dihydroxyethyl)-3-(uracil-1-yl)propionamide ( VIIb , 3-HEUPA) were synthesized through the selective N-acylation of 2-methyl-2-amino-1,3-propanediol and diethanolamine with 3-TPA and 3-UPA, respectively, by the active ester-N-hydroxyl-1,4-epoxy-5-cyclohexene-2,3-dicarboximide (HOEC) method. The resulting diols were polycondensed with active diamide of benzotriazole (HBT) such as 1,1′-(isophthaloyl)bis-benzotriazole (IPBBT), giving polyesters containing thymine and uracil derivatives as the side group, by the selective O-acrylation of active amide-benzotriazole method.     

Regioselective Transformations of 2′,3′-Seconucleosides into Anhydro Structures and Chiral Crown Ethers

Intramolecular cyclisation of properly protected and activated derivatives of 2′,3′-secouridine ( = 1-{2-hydroxy-1-[2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethoxy]-ethyl}uracil; 1 ) provided access to the 2,2′-, 2,3′-, 2,5′-, 2′,5′-, 3′,5′-, and 2′,3′-anhydro-2′,3′-secouridines 5, 16, 17, 26, 28 , and 31 , respectively (Schemes 1–3). Reaction of 2′,5′-anhydro-3′-O-(methylsulfonyl)- ( 25 ) and 2′,3′-anhydro-5′-O-(methylsulfonyl)-2′,3′-secouridine ( 32 ) with CH₂CI₂ in the presence of 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene generated the N(3)-methylene-bridged bis-uridine structure 37 and 36 , respectively (Scheme 3). Novel chiral 18-crown-6 ethers 40 and 44 , containing a hydroxymethyl and a uracil-1-yl or adenin-9-yl as the pendant groups in a 1,3-cis relationship, were synthesized from 5′-O-(triphenylmethyl)-2′,3′-secouridine ( 2 ) and 5′-O,N⁶-bis(triphenylmethyl)-2′,3′-secoadenosine ( 41 ) on reaction with 3,6,9-trioxaundecane-1,11-diyl bis(4-toluenesulfonate) and detritylation of the thus obtained (triphenylmethoxy) methylcompound 39 and 43 , respectively (Scheme 4).     

Synthesis of Indolones via Radical Cyclization of N‐(2‐Halogenoalkanoyl)‐Substituted Anilines

The radical reactions of N‐(2‐halogenoalkanoyl)‐substituted anilines (anilides) of type 1 have been investigated under various conditions. Treatment of compounds 1a – 1o with Bu₃SnH in the presence of (2,2′‐azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) afforded a mixture of the indolones (oxindoles) 2a – 2o and the reduction products 5a – 5o (Table 1). In contrast, the N‐unsubstituted anilides 1p – 1s, 1u , and 1v gave the corresponding reduction products exclusively (Table 1). Similar results were obtained by treatment of 1 with Ni powder (Table 2) or wth Et₃B (Table 3). Anilides with longer N‐(phenylalkyl) chains such as 6 and 7 were inert towards radical cyclization, with the exception of N‐benzyl‐2‐bromo‐N,2‐dimethylpropanamide ( 6b ), which, upon treatment with Ni powder in i‐PrOH, afforded the cyclized product 9b in low yield (Table 4). Upon irradiation, the extended anilides 6, 7, 10 , and 11 yielded the corresponding dehydrobromination products exclusively (Table 5).     

A chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine)­ruthenium(II) complex

The aldehyde moiety in the title complex, chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ³N)ruthenium(II)–chloro­(2‐pyridine­carboxyl­ic acid‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine‐κ³N)­ruthenium(II)–perchlorate–chloro­form–water (1.8/0.2/2/1/1), [RuCl­(C₆H₅NO)­(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_1.8[RuCl­(C₆H₅­NO₂)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_0.2­(ClO₄)₂·­CHCl₃·­H₂O, is a structural model of substrate coordination to a transfer hydrogenation catalyst. The title complex features two independent Ru^II complex cations that display very similar distorted octahedral coordination provided by the three N atoms of the 2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine ligand, the N and O atoms of the 2‐pyridine­carbox­aldehyde (pyCHO) ligand and a chloride ligand. One of the cation sites is disordered such that the aldehyde group is replaced by a 20 (1)% contribution from a carboxyl­ic acid group (aldehyde H replaced by carboxyl O—H). Notable dimensions in the non‐disordered complex cation are Ru—N 2.034 (2) Å and Ru—O 2.079 (2) Å to the pyCHO ligand and O—C 1.239 (4) Å for the pyCHO carbonyl group.     

Mass spectral rearrangements of 3-arylsulphonyl-2-arylthiopropenes and N-(4′-arylsulphonyl-2′-butynyl)-N-(4″-arylthio-2″-butynyl)anilines

Under electron impact the title compounds undergo skeletal rearrangement in addition to the anticipated modes of cleavage. The 3-arylsulphonyl-2-arylthiopropenes readily eliminate sulphur dioxide. Other modes of fragmentation include rearrangement to a bisaryl sulphide moiety and sulphone-sulphinate rearrangement. The formation of a bisaryl sulphide ion is analogous to the behaviour of the isomeric trans-1-arylsulphonyl-2-arylthiopropenes. N-(4′-Arylsulphonyl-2′-butynyl)-N-(4″-arylthio-2″-butynyl) anilines do not undergo any of the skeletal rearrangements mentioned above, but display the concerted loss of the arylsulphonyl and arylthio moieties. Similar eliminations have been observed from the analogous bis-sulphides and bis-sulphones.     

Brominated trimetrexate analogues as inhibitors of pneumocystis carinii and toxoplasma gondii dihydrofolate reductase

Five previously undescribed trimetrexate analogues with bulky 2′-bromo substitution on the phenyl ring were synthesized in order to assess the effect of this structure modification on dihydrofolate reductase inhibition. Condensation of 2-[2-(2-bromo-3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)ethyl]-1,l-dicyanopropene with sulfur in the presence of N,N-diethylamine afforded 2-amino-5-(2′-bromo-3′,4′,5′-trimethoxybenzyl)-4-methyl-thiophene-3-carbonitrile ( 15 ) and 2-amino-4-[2-(2′-bromo-3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyphenyl)ethyl]thiophene-3-car-bonitrile ( 16 ). Further reaction with chloroformamidine hydrochloride converted 15 and 16 into 2,4-diamino-5-(2′-bromo-3′,4′,5′-trimethoxybenzyl)-4-methylthieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine ( 8a ) and 2,4-diamino-4-[2-(2′-bromo-3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyphenyl)ethylthieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine ( 12 ) respectively. Other analogues, obtained by reductive coupling of the appropriate 2,4-diaminoquinazoline-6(or 5)-carbonitriles with 2-bromo-3,4,5-trimethoxyaniline, were 2,4-diamino-6-(2′-bromo-3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyanilinomethyl)-5-chloro-quinazoline ( 9a ), 2,4-diamino-5-(2′-bromo-3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyanilinomethyl)quinazoline ( 10 ), and 2,4-diamino-6-(2′-bromo-3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyanilinomethyl)quinazoline ( 11 ). Enzyme inhibition assays revealed that space-filling 2′-bromo substitution in this limited series of dicyclic 2,4-diaminopyrimidines with a 3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyphenyl side chain and a CH₂, CH₂CH₂, or CH₂NH bridge failed to improve species selectivity against either P. carinii or T. gondii dihydrofolate reductase relative to rat liver dihydrofolate reductase.     

Two stereoisomeric pentacyclic oxin­dole alkaloids from Uncaria tomentosa: uncarine C and uncarine E

The chloro­form solvate of uncarine C (pteropodine), (1′S,3R,4′aS,5′aS,10′aS)‐1,2,5′,5′a,7′,8′,10′,10′a‐octa­hydro‐1′‐methyl‐2‐oxospiro­[3H‐indole‐3,6′(4′aH)‐[1H]­pyrano­[3,4‐f]indolizine]‐4′‐carboxyl­ic acid methyl ester, C₂₁H₂₄N₂O₄·CHCl₃, has an absolute configuration with the spiro C atom in the R configuration. Its epimer at the spiro C atom, uncarine E (isopteropodine), (1′S,3S,4′aS,5′aS,10′aS)‐1,2,5′,5′a,7′,8′,10′,10′a‐octahydro‐1′‐methyl‐2‐oxospiro[3H‐indole‐3,6′(4′aH)‐[1H]pyrano[3,4‐f]indolizine]‐4′‐carboxylic acid methyl ester, C₂₁H₂₄N₂O₄, has Z′ = 3, with no solvent. Both form intermolecular hydrogen bonds involving only the ox­indole, with N?O distances in the range 2.759 (4)–2.894 (5) Å.     

Solvent Molecule Controlled Zinc(II) Metal‐Organic Frameworks with Different Topology

Two zinc(II) coordination polymers, namely [Zn₂(bptc)(DMF)₂(H₂O)]_n ( 1 ) and [Zn(bptc)_0.5(DMA)]_n ( 2 ) (H₄bptc = biphenyl‐3,3′,5,5′‐tetracarboxylic acid, DMF = N,N′‐dimethylformamide, DMA = N,N′‐dimethylacetamide), were obtained under solvothermal conditions by varying the reaction solvents. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses revealed that compound 1 features a 3D PtS type framework based on dinuclear [Zn₂O(COO)₂] subunits and compound 2 features a 3D lvt type framework based on paddle‐wheel shaped [Zn₂(COO)₄] subunits. Moreover, the luminescent and thermal stabilities of these two compounds were investigated.     

Synthesis of 1′-substituted 4′,4′-dimethyl-6′-methoxy-4′H-spiro[cyclohexane-1,3′-isoquinolines]

The reaction of 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(1-methylcyclohexyl)ethanol with nitriles in concentrated sulfuric acid afforded 1′-substituted 6′-methoxy-4′,4′-dimethyl-4′H-spiro[cyclohexane-1,3′-isoquinolines] as a result of consecutive Wagner-Meerwein rearrangement and Ritter reaction.     

Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution of Groups other than Hydrogen. Part II: SN1-Type Desulfonation of 2-Naphthol-1-sulfonic Acid by Diazonium Ions in Aprotic Apolar Solvents. 27th communication on diazo coupling reactions

The rates of formation of 1-(4′-chlorophenylazo-)-2-naphthol by SO₃ of release from the π-complex [2-naphthol-1-sulfonate anion …? p-chlorobenzenediazonium cation] have been measured in chloroform and in methylene chloride; they are first-order with respect to the complex. They are catalysed by pyridine and co-catalysed by acetic acid. Acids alone, in stoichiometric or higher concentrations, inhibit the reaction. A mechanism is postulated involving proton transfer to the sulfonate group, followed by rearrangement to the σ-complex which, in the catalysed reaction, first loses a proton to the base and then releases SO₃, but in the uncatalysed reaction loses SO₃H^⊕. The function of the co-catalyst (pyridinium ion) is explained (see text). This reaction is - in contrast to electrophilic aromatic substitutions in which the leaving group is a protonan S_N1-type re-aromatization of the σ-complex to the product.