Zu den Kristallstrukturen der Übergangsmetall(II)‐Dodekahydro‐closo‐Dodekaborat‐Hydrate Cu(H2O)5,5[B12H12]·2,5 H2O und Zn(H2O)6[B12H12]·6 H2O

On the Crystal Structures of the Transition‐Metal(II) Dodecahydro‐closo‐Dodecaborate Hydrates Cu(H₂O)_5.5[B₁₂H₁₂]·2.5 H₂O and Zn(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂]·6 H₂O By neutralization of an aqueous solution of the free acid (H₃O)₂[B₁₂H₁₂] with basic copper(II) carbonate or zinc carbonate, blue lath‐shaped single crystals of the octahydrate Cu[B₁₂H₁₂]·8 H₂O (≡ Cu(H₂O)_5.5[B₁₂H₁₂]·2.5 H₂O) and colourless face‐rich single crystals of the dodecahydrate Zn[B₁₂H₁₂]·12 H₂O (≡ Zn(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂]·6 H₂O) could be isolated after isothermic evaporation. Copper(II) dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborate octahydrate crystallizes at room temperature in the monoclinic system with the non‐centrosymmetric space group Pm (Cu(H₂O)_5.5[B₁₂H₁₂]·2.5 H₂O: a = 768.23(5), b = 1434.48(9), c = 777.31(5) pm, β = 90.894(6)°; Z = 2), whereas zinc dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborate dodecahydrate crystallizes cubic in the likewise non‐centrosymmetric space group F23 (Zn(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂]·6 H₂O: a = 1637.43(9) pm; Z = 8). The crystal structure of Cu(H₂O)_5.5[B₁₂H₁₂]·2.5 H₂O can be described as a monoclinic distortion variant of the CsCl‐type arrangement. As characteristic feature the formation of isolated [Cu₂(H₂O)₁₁]⁴⁺ units as a condensate of two corner‐linked Jahn‐Teller distorted [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ octahedra via an oxygen atom of crystal water can be considered. Since “zeolitic” water of hydratation is also present, obviously both classical H–O^δ?···^+δH–O and non‐classical B–H^δ?···^+δH–O hydrogen bonds play a significant role for the stabilization of the structure. A direct coordinative influence of the quasi‐icosahedral [B₁₂H₁₂]^2? anions on the Cu²⁺ cations has not been determined. The zinc compound Zn(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂]·6 H₂O crystallizes in a NaTl‐type related structure. Two crystallographically different [Zn(H₂O)₆]²⁺ octahedra are present, which only differ in their relative orientation within the packing of the [B₁₂H₁₂]^2? anions. The stabilization of the crystal structure takes place mainly via H–O^δ?···^+δH–O hydrogen bonds, since again the hydrogen atoms of the [B₁₂H₁₂]^2? anions have no direct coordinative influence on the Zn²⁺ cations.     

Preparation and Crystal Structures of the Hydrous Mercury Tellurates,HgII(H4TeVIO6) and HgI2(H4TeVIO6)(H6TeVIO6)·2H2O

Single crystals of Hg^II(H₄Te^VIO₆) (colourless to light‐yellow, rectangular plates) and Hg^I₂(H₄Te^VIO₆)(H₆Te^VIO₆)·2H₂O (colourless, irregular) were grown from concentrated solutions of orthotelluric acid, H₆TeO₆, and respective solutions of Hg(NO₃)₂ and Hg₂(NO₃)₂. The crystal structures were solved and refined from single crystal diffractometer data sets (Hg^II(H₄Te^VIO₆): space group Pna2₁, Z = 4, a =10.5491(17), b = 6.0706(9), c = 8.0654(13)Å, 1430 structure factors, 87 parameters, R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.0180; Hg^I₂(H₄Te^VIO₆)(H₆Te^VIO₆)·2H₂O: space group P1¯, Z = 1, a = 5.7522(6), b = 6.8941(10), c = 8.5785(10)Å, α = 90.394(8), β = 103.532(11), γ = 93.289(8)°, 2875 structure factors, 108 parameters, R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.0184). The structure of Hg^II(H₄Te^VIO₆) is composed of ribbons parallel to the b axis which are built of [H₄TeO₆]^2— anions and Hg²⁺ cations held together by two short Hg—O bonds with a mean distance of 2.037Å. Interpolyhedral hydrogen bonding between neighbouring [H₄TeO₆]^2— groups, as well as longer Hg—O bonds between Hg atoms of one ribbon to O atoms of adjacent ribbons lead, to an additional stabilization of the framework structure. Hg^I₂(H₄Te^VIO₆)(H₆Te^VIO₆)·2H₂O is characterized by a distorted hexagonal array made up of [H₄TeO₆]^2— and [H₆TeO₆] octahedra which spread parallel to the bc plane. Interpolyhedral hydrogen bonding between both building units stabilizes this arrangement. Adjacent planes are stacked along the a axis and are connected by Hg₂²⁺ dumbbells (d(Hg—Hg) = 2.5043(4)Å) situated in‐between the planes. Additional stabilization of the three‐dimensional network is provided by extensive hydrogen bonding between interstitial water molecules and O and OH‐groups of the [H₄TeO₆]^2— and [H₆TeO₆] octahedra. Upon heating Hg^I₂(H₄Te^VIO₆)(H₆Te^VIO₆)·2H₂O decomposes into TeO₂ under formation of the intermediate phases Hg^II₃Te^VIO₆ and the mixed‐valent Hg^IITe^IV/VI₂O₆.     

Freezing Point of Mixtures of H2 16O with H2 17O and Those of Aqueous CD3CH2OH and CH3 13CH2OH Solutions

The freezing point of mixtures of H₂ ¹⁶O with H₂ ¹⁷O was measured as a function of the molal concentration. The freezing points rose linearly with increasing molal concentration above that of pure ordinary water, H₂ ¹⁶O, at 273.15 K. This confirms Kiyosawa's previous conclusion [K. Kiyosawa, J. Solution Chem. 20, 583 (1991).], drawn from findings on changes in the freezing point of mixtures of H₂ ¹⁶O with H₂ ¹⁸O or D₂ ¹⁶O that even a difference in the number of neutrons in the hydrogen or oxygen atoms of water molecules makes them behave as different entities with respect to the colligative properties of solutions. This has been confirmed to also occur in mixtures of H₂ ¹⁶O with H₂ ¹⁷O.     

Preparation and X-Ray Study of Inclusion Complexes of (4Z,5E)-Pyrimidine-2,4,5,6(1 H,3H)-Tetraone 4,5-Dioxime and the Product of Its Cyclization, (1,2,5)-Oxadiazolo(3,4-d)-Pyrimidine-5,7(4 H,6H)-Dione with Two 18-Membered Macrocycles

The novel dioxime, (4Z,5E)-pyrimidine-2,4,5,6(1H,3H)-tetraone 4,5-dioxime (H₂-PTD) was obtained by the interaction of 6-amino-5-nitrosopyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione with hydroxylamine hydrochloride. X-ray structural analysis determined the 4Z,5E-configuration of the corresponding monoanion, pyrimidine-2,6(1H,3H)-dione-4-iminole-5-iminolate in the inclusion complexes with diazonia-18-crown-6 (1,4,10,13-tetraoxa-7,16-diazoniacyclooctadecane) (H₂-DA18C6)²⁺ (complex (1), stoichiometry 2 : 1), and its ammonium salt in the complex with the cis-syn-cis isomer of dicyclohexano-18-crown-6(DCHA) (cis-syn-cis-2,5,8,15,18,21-hexaoxatricyclo (20.4.0.0^9,14)hexacosane) (complex (2), stoichiometry 1 : 1). X-ray data were also obtained for the complex of the product of (H₂-PTD) cyclization, (1,2,5)-oxadiazolo(3,4-d)pyrimidine-5,7(4H,6H)-dione (OPD) with diaqua diaza-18-crown-6 (complex (3), stoichiometry 2 : 2 : 1).In (1) the (H-PTD)^- anions are joined into dimers through the bifurcated OH...N and OH...O hydrogen bonds and alternate with diazonia-18-crown-6 cations in the chains sustained by the NH(crown) ... O and NH(crown) ...N interactions. The chains are further combined into the 3D network via NH...O(crown) hydrogen bonds. In (2) the self-complementarity of the (H-PTD)^- anions facilitates their assembly into the chain via OH...N, NH...O and OH...O interactions. The ammonium cations bridge each anion and the DCHA macrocycle with the formation of a ribbon developed along the [101] direction in the unit cell. Ternary complex (3) is built of the neutral species, diaza-18-crown-6, water molecules and dimers of OPD alternated in the chains and held together by OH...O and NH...O hydrogen bonds.     

Structural Diversity of Sheets in Rubidium Uranyl Oxoselenates: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of Rb2[(UO2)(SeO4)2(H2O)](H2O), Rb2[(UO2)2(SeO4)3(H2O)2](H2O)4, and Rb4[(UO2)3(SeO4)5(H2O)]

Single crystals of three rubidium uranyl selenates, Rb₂[(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)](H₂O) ( 1 ), Rb₂[(UO₂)₂(SeO₄)₃(H₂O)₂](H₂O)₄ ( 2 ), and Rb₄[(UO₂)₃(SeO₄)₅(H₂O)] ( 3 ), have been prepared by evaporation from aqueous solutions made out of mixtures of uranyl nitrate, selenic acid and Rb₂CO₃. The structures of all compounds have been solved by direct methods on the basis of X‐ray diffraction data sets. The crystallographic data are as follows: ( 1 ): orthorhombic, Pna2₁, a = 13.677(2), b = 11.8707(13), c = 7.6397(9) Å, V = 1240.4(3) ų, R₁ = 0.045 for 2396 independent observed reflections; ( 2 ): triclinic, P1¯, a = 8.4261(12), b = 11.8636(15), c = 13.3279(18) Å, α = 102.612(10), β = 107.250(10), γ = 102.510(10)°, V = 1183.7(3) ų, R₁ = 0.067 for 4762 independent observed reflections; ( 3 ): orthorhombic, Pbnm, a = 11.3761(14), b = 15.069(2), c = 19.2089(17) Å, V = 3292.9(7) ų, R₁ = 0.075 for 3808 independent observed reflections. The structures of the phases 1 , 2 , and 3 are based upon uranyl selenate hydrate sheets composed from corner‐sharing pentagonal [UO₇]^8— bipyramids and [SeO₄]^2— tetrahedra. In the crystal structure of 1 , the sheets have composition [(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)]^2— and run parallel to (001). The interlayer contains Rb⁺ cations and additional H₂O molecules. In structure of 2 , the [(UO₂)₂(SeO₄)₃(H₂O)₂]^2— sheets are oriented parallel to (101). Highly disordered Rb⁺ cations and H₂O molecules are located between the sheets. The structure of 3 is based upon [(UO₂)₃(SeO₄)₅(H₂O)]^4— sheets stacked parallel to (010) and contains Rb⁺ cations in the interlayers. The topologies of the uranyl oxoselenate sheets observed in the structures of 1 , 2 , and 3 are related to the same simple and highly‐symmetric graph consisting of 3‐connected white and 6‐connected black vertices.     

Freezing-point of mixtures of H 2 16 O and H 2 18 O

Freezing-point depression of mixtures of H ₂ ¹⁶ O and H ₂ ¹⁸ O were measured. The results showed that the freezing point of the mixture rose linearly with an increase in the molal concentration of H ₂ ¹⁸ O. The results suggested the formation of a solid solution of H ₂ ¹⁶ O and H ₂ ¹⁸ O by freezing, similar to that formed by H ₂ O–D ₂ O, and that H ₂ ¹⁸ O behaves as a different molecule than H ₂ ¹⁶ O.     

Synthesis and Structure of the First Protonated Zincoborophosphate: (H_3O)Zn(H_2O)_2BP_2O_8·H_2O

IntroductionInthelastfewyearsthesearchfornewmaterialswithmicroporousandzeolite analogoussystemshasprimarilyfocusedonaluminumphosphatesandaluminosilicatecom poundssubstitutedwithavarietyofatoms .1 3 Cobalt sub stitutedaluminophosphatesaresystematicallystudiedmainlyduetotheirpotentialuseassolid acidcatalysts .Insuchmaterials ,theBr nstedacidsiteisgeneratedbyeachsubstitutionofAl(III)byCo(II)inwhichaprotonisneededtobalancethecharge .4 7Tofindnewtypeofze oliticmaterials ,theborophosphatemateri…     

Crystal Structures of [Mn2(H2O)4(phen)2(C4H4O4)2] · 2 H2O and [Mn(phen)2(H2O)2][Mn(phen)2(C4H4O4)](C4H4O4) · 7 H2O

Reactions of 1,10‐phenanthroline monohydrate, Na₂C₄H₄O₄ · 6 H₂O and MnSO₄ · H₂O in CH₃OH/H₂O yielded a mixture of [Mn₂(H₂O)₄(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)₂] · 2 H₂O ( 1 ) and [Mn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂][Mn(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)](C₄H₄O₄) · 7 H₂O ( 2 ). The crystal structure of 1 (P1 (no. 2), a = 8.257(1) Å, b = 8.395(1) Å, c = 12.879(2) Å, α = 95.33(1)°, β = 104.56(1)°, γ = 106.76(1)°, V = 814.1(2) ų, Z = 1) consists of the dinuclear [Mn₂(H₂O)₄(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)₂] molecules and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The centrosymmetric dinuclear molecules, in which the Mn atoms are octahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and four O atoms from two H₂O molecules and two bis‐monodentate succinato ligands, are assembled via π‐π stacking interactions into 2 D supramolecular layers parallel to (101) (d(Mn–O) = 2.123–2.265 Å, d(Mn–N) = 2.307 Å). The crystal structure of 2 (P1 (no. 2), a = 14.289(2) Å, b = 15.182(2) Å, c = 15.913(2) Å, α = 67.108(7)°, β = 87.27(1)°, γ = 68.216(8)°, V = 2934.2(7) ų, Z = 2) is composed of the [Mn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ cations, [Mn(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)] complex molecules, (C₄H₄O₄)^2– anions, and H₂O molecules. The (C₄H₄O₄)^2– anions and H₂O molecules form 3 D hydrogen bonded network and the cations and complex molecules in the tunnels along [001] and [011], respectively, are assembled via the π‐π stacking interactions into 1 D supramolecular chains. The Mn atoms are octahedrally coordinated by four N atoms of two bidentate chelating phen ligands and two water O atoms or two carboxyl O atoms (d(Mn–O) = 2.088–2.129 Å, d(Mn–N) = 2.277–2.355 Å). Interestingly, the succinato ligands in the complex molecules assume gauche conformation bidentately to chelate the Mn atoms into seven‐membered rings.     

Syntheses,Crystal Structures,and Properties of the Isotypic Pair [Cr(H2O)6]2[B12H12]3·15H2O and [In(H2O)6]2[B12H12]3·15H2O

Single crystals of [Cr(H₂O)₆]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃ · 15H₂O and [In(H₂O)₆]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃ · 15H₂O were obtained by reactions of aqueous solutions of the acid (H₃O)₂[B₁₂H₁₂] with chromium(III) hydroxide and indium metal shot, respectively. The title compounds crystallize isotypically in the trigonal system with space group R$\bar{3}$ c (a = 1157.62(3), c = 6730.48(9) pm for the chromium, a = 1171.71(3), c = 6740.04(9) pm for the indium compound, Z = 6). The arrangement of the quasi‐icosahedral [B₁₂H₁₂]^2– dianions can be considered as stacking of two times nine layers with the sequence …ABCCABBCA… and the metal trications arrange in a cubic closest packed …abc… stacking sequence. The metal trications are octahedrally coordinated by six water molecules of hydration, while another fifteen H₂O molecules fill up the structures as zeolitic crystal water or second‐sphere hydrating species. Between these free and the metal‐bonded water molecules, bridging hydrogen bonds are found. Furthermore, there is also evidence of hydrogen bonding between the anionic [B₁₂H₁₂]^2– clusters and the free zeolitic water molecules according to B–H^δ– ··· ^δ+H–O interactions. Vibrational spectroscopy studies prove the presence of these hydrogen bonds and also show slight distortions of the dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborate anions from their ideal icosahedral symmetry (I_h). Thermal decomposition studies for the example of [Cr(H₂O)₆]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃ · 15H₂O gave no hints for just a simple multi‐stepwise dehydration process.     

Comparison of two polymeric transition metal complexes with 1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate ions as bridging ligands, [Co(C8H4O4)(C12H8N2)(H2O)] and [Cu(C8H4O4)(C10H9N3)]·H2O

The title complexes, catena‐poly[[aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­cobalt(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,4‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ²O¹:O⁴], [Co(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(H₂O)], (I), and catena‐poly[[[(di‐2‐pyridyl‐κN‐amine)copper(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,4‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ⁴O¹,O^1′:O⁴,O^4′] hydrate], [Cu(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]·H₂O, (II), take the form of zigzag chains, with the 1,4‐benzene­di­carboxyl­ate ion acting as an amphimonodentate ligand in (I) and a bis‐bidentate ligand in (II). The Co^II ion in (I) is five‐coordinate and has a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry. The Cu^II ion in (II) is in a very distorted octahedral 4+2 environment, with the octahedron elongated along the trans O—Cu—O bonds and with a trans O—Cu—O angle of only 137.22 (8)°.     

Synthese,Kristallstruktur und thermischer Abbau von Mg(H2O)6[B12H12] · 6 H2O

Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Thermal Decomposition of Mg(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂] · 6 H₂O By reaction of an aqueous solution of the free acid (H₃O)₂[B₁₂H₁₂] with MgCO₃ and subsequent isothermic evaporation of the resulting solution to dryness, colourless, bead‐shaped single crystals of the dodecahydrate of magnesium dodecahydro closo‐dodecaborate Mg(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂] · 6 H₂O (cubic, F4₁32; a = 1643.21(9) pm, Z = 8) emerge. The crystal structure is best described as a NaTl‐type arrangement in which the centers of gravity of the quasi‐icosahedral [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— anions (d(B—B) = 178—180 pm, d(B—H) = 109 pm) occupy the positions of Tl^— while the Mg²⁺ cations occupy the Na⁺ positions. A direct coordinative influence of the [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— units at the Mg²⁺ cations is however not noticeable. The latter are octahedrally coordinated by six water molecules forming isolated hexaaqua complex cations [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺ (d(Mg—O) = 206 pm, 6×). In addition, six “zeolitic” water molecules are located in the crystal structure for the formation of a strong O—H^δ+···^δ—O‐hydrogen bridge‐bonding system. The evidence of weak B—H^δ—···^δ+H—O‐hydrogen bonds between water molecules and anionic [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— clusters is also considered. Investigations on the dodecahydrate Mg[B₁₂H₁₂] · 12 H₂O (≡ Mg(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂] · 6 H₂O) by DTA/TG measurements showed that its dehydration takes place in two steps within a temperature range of 71 and 76 °C as well as at 202 °C, respectively. Thermal treatment eventually leads to the anhydrous magnesium dodecahydro closo‐dodecaborate Mg[B₁₂H₁₂].     

Two Heteroleptic Zinc(II) Complexes: [Zn(phen)(C9H15O6)2] and [Zn2(phen)2(H2O)2(C10H16O4)2] · 3H2O

Reactions of a freshly prepared Zn(OH)_2‐2x(CO₃)x · yH₂O precipitate, phenanthroline with azelaic and sebacic acid in CH₃OH/H₂O afforded [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] ( 1 ) and [Zn₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₂(C₁₀H₁₆O₄)₂] · 3H₂O ( 2 ), respectively. They were structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction methods. Compound 1 consists of complex molecules [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] in which the Zn atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and two O atoms of different monodentate hydrogen azelaato groups. Intermolecular C(alkyl)‐H···π interactions and the intermolecular C(aryl)‐H···O and O‐H···O hydrogen bonds are responsible for the supramolecular assembly of the [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] complexes. Compound 2 is built up from crystal H₂O molecules and the centrosymmetric binuclear [Zn₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₂(C₁₀H₁₆O₄)₂] complex, in which two [Zn(phen)(H₂O)]²⁺ moieties are bridged by two sebacato ligands. Through the intermolecular C(alkyl)‐H···O hydrogen bonds and π‐π stacking interactions, the binuclear complex molecules are assembled into layers, between which the lattice H₂O molecules are sandwiched. Crystal data: ( 1 ) C2/c (no. 15), a = 13.887(2), b = 9.790(2), c = 22.887(3)Å, β = 107.05(1)°, U = 2974.8(8)ų, Z = 4; ( 2 ) P1¯ (no. 2), a = 8.414(1), b = 10.679(1), c = 14.076(2)Å, α = 106.52(1)°, β = 91.56(1)°, γ = 99.09(1)°, U = 1193.9(2)ų, Z = 1.     

The reaction of O(1D) with H2O and the reaction of OH with C3H6

N₂O was photolyzed at 2139 Å to produce O(¹D) atoms in the presence of H₂O and CO. The O(¹D) atoms react with H₂O to produce HO radicals, as measured by CO₂ production from the reaction of OH with CO. The relative importance of the various possible O(¹D )–H₂O reactions is The relative rate constant for O(¹D) removal by H₂O compared to that by N₂O is 2.1, in good agreement with that found earlier in our laboratory. In the presence Of C₃H₆, the OH can be removed by reaction with either CO or C₃H₆: From the CO₂ yield, k₃/k₂ = 75,0 at 100°C and 55.0 at 200°C to within ± 10%. When these values are combined with the value of k₂ = 7.0 × 10^?13exp (–1100/RT) cm³/sec, k₃ = 1.36 × 10^?11 exp (–100/RT) cm³/sec. At 25°C, k₃ extrapolates to 1.1 × 10^?11 cm³/sec.     

Syntheses and crystal structures of [Na(H2O)](C17H13O6SO3)* 2H2O and [NKH2O)6]C17H13O6SO3)2*H2O

Two hydrates of sodium 5,7‐dihydroxy‐6,4′‐dimethoxyisoflavone‐3′‐sulfonate ([Na(H₂O)J(C₁₇H₁₃O₆SO₃)*2H₂O,] 1) and nickel 5,7‐dihydroxy‐6,4′‐dimethoxyisoflavone‐3′‐sulfonate ([Ni(H₂O)₆](C₁₇H₁₃O₆SO₃)₂*4H₂O, 2) were synthesized and characterized by IR, 'H NMR and X‐ray diffraction analyses. The hydrate 1 crystallizes in the mono‐clinic system, space group P2(1) with a=0.8201(9) nm, b=0.8030(8) nm, c= 1.5361(16) nm, β=102.052(12)°, V =0.9893(18) nm³, D,= 1.579 g/cm³, Z=2, μ=0.252 nm^?1, F(000)=488, R=0.0353, wR=0.0873. The hydrate 2 belongs to triclinic system, space group P‐1 with a=0.7411(3) nm, b=0.8333(3) nm, c=1.7448(7) nm, α= 86.361(6)°, β=86.389(5)°, γ= 88.999(3)°, V=1.0731(7) nm³, D,=1.587 g/cm³, Z=1, μ=0.649 m^?1, F(000)= 534. In the structure of 1, the sodium cation is coordinated by six oxygen atom and two adjacent ones are bridged by three oxygen atoms to form an octahedron chain. The C? H…?… hydrogen bonds exist between two isoflavone molecules in the structure of 2. Meanwhile, hydrogen bonds in two compounds, link themselves to assemble two three‐dimensional network structures, respectively.     

Low‐Dimensional Structural Units in Amine‐Templated Uranyl Oxoselenates(VI): Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [C3H12N2][(UO2)(SeO4)2(H2O)2](H2O), [C5H16N2]2[(UO2)(SeO4)2(H2O)](NO3)2, [C4H12N][(UO2)(SeO4)(NO3)], and [C4H14N2][(UO2)(SeO4)2(H2O)]

The crystals of four amine‐templated uranyl oxoselenates(VI), [C₃H₁₂N₂][(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)₂](H₂O) ( 1 ), [C₅H₁₆N₂]₂[(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)](NO₃)₂ ( 2 ), [C₄H₁₂N][(UO₂)(SeO₄)(NO₃)] ( 3 ), and [C₄H₁₄N₂][(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)] ( 4 ) were prepared by evaporation from aqueous solution of uranyl nitrate, selenic acid and the respective amine. The crystal structures of all four compounds have been solved by direct methods from X‐ray diffraction data. The structure of 1 (triclinic, , a = 7.5611(16), b = 7.7650(17), c = 12.925(3) Å, α = 94.605(18), β = 94.405(17), γ = 96.470(17)°, V = 748.8(3) ų, R₁ = 0.029 for 2769 unique observed reflections) is based upon 0D‐units of the composition [(UO₂)₂(SeO₄)₄(H₂O)₄]^4?. These discrete units are composed from two pentagonal [UO₇]^8? bipyramids linked via [SeO₄]^2? tetrahedra and are unknown in structural chemistry of uranium so far. The structure of 2 (monoclinic, C2/c, a = 28.916(5), b = 8.0836(10), c = 11.9856(16) Å, β = 110.909(11)°, V = 2617.1(6) ų, R₁ = 0.035 for 2578 unique observed reflections) contains [(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)]^2? chains of corner‐sharing pentagonal [UO₇]^8? bipyramids and [SeO₄]^2? tetrahedra. The chains run parallel to the c axis and are arranged into layers parallel to (100). In the structure of 3 (monoclinic, C2/m, a = 21.244(5), b = 7.1092(11), c = 8.6581(18) Å, β = 97.693(17)°, V = 1295.8(4) ų, R₁ = 0.027 for 1386 unique observed reflections), pentagonal [UO₇]^8? bipyramids share corners with three [SeO₄]^2? tetrahedra each and an edge with a [NO₃]^? anion to form [(UO₂)(SeO₄)(NO₃)]^? chains parallel to the b axis. In the structure of 4 (triclinic, , a = 6.853(2), b = 10.537(3), c = 10.574(3) Å, α = 99.62(3), β = 94.45(3), γ = 100.52(3)°, V = 735.6(4) ų, R₁ = 0.045 for 2713 unique observed reflections), one symmetrically independent pentagonal [UO₇]^8? bipyramid shares corners with four [SeO₄]^2? tetrahedra to form the [(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)]^2? chains parallel to the a axis. A comparison to related uranyl compounds is given.     

Das Lanthan‐Dodekahydro‐closo‐Dodekaborat‐Hydrat [La(H2O)9]2[B12H12]3·15 H2O und sein Oxonium‐Chlorid‐Derivat [La(H2O)9](H3O)Cl2[B12H12]·H2O

The Lanthanum Dodecahydro‐closo‐Dodecaborate Hydrate [La(H₂O)₉]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃·15 H₂O and its Oxonium‐Chloride Derivative [La(H₂O)₉](H₃O)Cl₂[B₁₂H₁₂]·H₂O By neutralization of an aqueous solution of the free acid (H₃O)₂[B₁₂H₁₂] with basic La₂O₃ and after isothermic evaporation colourless, face‐rich single crystals of a water‐rich lanthanum(III) dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborate hydrate [La(H₂O)₉]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃·15 H₂O are isolated. The compound crystallizes in the trigonal system with the centrosymmetric space group (a = 1189.95(2), c = 7313.27(9) pm, c/a = 6.146; Z = 6; measuring temperature: 100 K). The crystal structure of [La(H₂O)₉]₂[B₁₂H₁₂]₃·15 H₂O can be characterized by two of each other independent, one into another posed motives of lattice components. The [B₁₂H₁₂]²⁻ anions (d(B–B) = 177–179 pm; d(B–H) = 105–116 pm) are arranged according to the samarium structure, while the La³⁺ cations are arranged according to the copper structure. The lanthanum cations are coordinated in first sphere by nine oxygen atoms from water molecules in form of a threecapped trigonal prism (d(La–O) = 251–262 pm). A coordinative influence of the [B₁₂H₁₂]²⁻ anions on La³⁺ has not been determined. Since “zeolitic” water of hydratation is also present, obviously the classical H–O^δ–···^+δH–O‐hydrogen bonds play a significant role in the stabilization of the crystal structure. During the conversion of an aqueous solution of (H₃O)₂[B₁₂H₁₂] with lanthanum trichloride an anion‐mixed salt with the composition [La(H₂O)₉](H₃O)Cl₂[B₁₂H₁₂]·H₂O is obtained. The compound crystallizes in the hexagonal system with the non‐centrosymmetric space group (a = 808.84(3), c = 2064.51(8) pm, c/a = 2.552; Z = 2; measuring temperature: 293 K). The crystal structure can be characterized as a layer‐like structure, in which [B₁₂H₁₂]²⁻ anions and H₃O⁺ cations alternate with layers of [La(H₂O)₉]³⁺ cations (d(La–O) = 252–260 pm) and Cl⁻ anions along [001]. The [B₁₂H₁₂]²⁻ (d(B–B) = 176–179 pm; d(B–H) = 104–113 pm) and Cl⁻ anions exhibit no coordinative influence on La³⁺. Hydrogen bonds are formed between the H₃O⁺ cations and [B₁₂H₁₂]²⁻ anions, also between the water molecules of [La(H₂O)₉]³⁺ and Cl⁻ anions, which contribute to the stabilization of the crystal structure.     

Strukturen und thermische Zersetzung von enH2(H3O)[AlF6] und enH2[AlF5(H2O)]

Structures and Thermal Decomposition of enH₂(H₃O)[AlF₆] and enH₂[AlF₅(H₂O)] By precipitation with ethylene diamine (en) from a hydrofluoric acid solution of aluminium enH₂(H₃O)[AlF₆] is formed. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnma, a = 1084.9(1), b = 1079.4(1), c = 682.0(1) pm, R = 0.032. H₃O⁺ cations and [AlF₆]^3– anions are connected via strong H bonds to layers which are further linked to a 3 D network by H bonds from the enH₂²⁺ cations. By recrystallization from water or precipitation from a less acid solution enH₂[AlF₅(H₂O)] is formed, which crystallizes monoclinic in the space group P2₁ (a = 660.0(1), b = 563.5(1), c = 994.4(2) pm, β = 98.44(3)°, R = 0.029). The [AlF₅(H₂O)]^2– anions are linked by strong O–H…F bonding to form ‘einer-double chains' interconnected again via the enH₂²⁺ cations to a 3 D framework. Thermoanalytical investigations show that enH₂[AlF₅(H₂O)], by loss of water above 150 °C, as well as enH₂(H₃O)[AlF₆], by loss of water and HF above 120 °C, transform to enH₂AlF₅. The subsequent decomposition goes over NH₄⁺ containing intermediates towards β-AlF₃. Before decomposition the oxonium fluoroaluminate reveals a reversible phase transition at 99 °C.     

One‐dimensional Cadmium(II) Coordination Polymers: Syntheses and Crystal Structures of [Cd(H2O)3(C5H6O4)]·2H2O,Cd(H2O)2(C6H8O4), and Cd(H2O)2(C8H12O4)

[Cd(H₂O)₃(C₅H₆O₄)]·2H₂O ( 1 ) and Cd(H₂O)₂(C₆H₈O₄) ( 2 ) were prepared from reactions of fresh CdCO₃ precipitate with aqueous solutions of glutaric acid and adipic acid, respectively, while Cd(H₂O)₂(C₈H₁₂O₄) ( 3 ) crystallized in a filtrate obtained from the hydrothermal reaction of CdCl₂·2.5H₂O, suberic acid and H₂O. Compound 1 consists of hydrogen bonded water molecules and linear {[Cd(H₂O)₃](C₅H₆O₄)_2/2} chains, which result from the pentagonal bipyramidally coordinated Cd atoms bridged by bis‐chelating glutarato ligands. In 2 and 3 , the six‐coordinate Cd atoms are bridged by bis‐chelating adipato and suberato ligands into zigzag chains according to {[Cd(H₂O)₃](C₅H₆O₄)_2/2} and {[Cd(H₂O)₂](C₈H₁₂O₄)_2/2}, respectively. The hydrogen bonds between water and the carboxylate oxygen atoms are responsible for the supramolecular assemblies of the zigzag chains into 3D networks. Crystallographic data: ( 1 ) P1¯ (no. 2), a = 8.012(1), b = 8.160(1), c = 8.939(1) Å, α = 82.29(1)°, β = 76.69(1)°, γ = 81.68(1)°, U = 559.6(1) ų, Z = 2; ( 2 ) C2/c (no. 15), a = 16.495(1), b = 5.578(1), c = 11.073(1) Å, β = 95.48(1)°, U = 1014.2(1) ų, Z = 4; ( 3 ) P2/c (no. 13), a = 9.407(2), b = 5.491(1), c = 11.317(2) Å, β = 95.93(3)°, U = 581.4(2) ų, Z = 2.     

Thermochemical Study on [La(Hsal)2•(tch)]•2H2O [Hsal＝salicylate ( ), tch＝thioprolinate (C4H6NO2S-)]

The product from reaction of lanthanum chloride heptahydrate with salicylic acid and thioproline, [La(Hsal)2•(tch)]•2H2O, was synthesized and characterized by IR, elemental analysis, molar conductance, thermogravimatric analysis and chemistry analysis. The standard molar enthalpies of solution of LaCl3•7H2O (s), [2C7H6O3 (s)], C4H7NO2S (s) and [La(Hsal)2•(tch)]•2H2O (s) in a mixed solvent of absolute ethyl alcohol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 3 mol•L－1 HCl were determined by calorimetry to be [LaCl3•7H2O (s), 298.15 K]＝(－102.36±0.66) kJ•mol－1, [2C7H6O3 (s), 298.15 K]＝(26.65±0.22) kJ•mol－1, [C4H7NO2S (s), 298.15 K]＝(－21.79±0.35) kJ•mol－1 and {[La(Hsal)2•(tch)]•2H2O (s), 298.15 K}＝(－41.10±0.32) kJ•mol－1. The enthalpy change of the reaction LaCl3•7H2O (s)＋2C7H6O3 (s)＋C4H7NO2S (s)＝[La(Hsal)2•(tch)]•2H2O (s)＋3HCl (g)＋5H2O (l) (Eq. 1) was determined to be ＝(41.02±0.85) kJ•mol－1. From date in the literature, through Hess’ law, the standard molar enthalpy of formation of [La(Hsal)2•(tch)]•2H2O (s) was estimated to be {[La(Hsal)2•(tch)]•2H2O (s), 298.15 K}＝(－3017.0±3.7) kJ•mol－1.     

Calculation of the Gibbs Energy of the Reaction OH-·(H2O)n-1 + H2O = OH-·(H2O)n by the Monte-Carlo Method

The energy, the Gibbs energy of the reaction OH^-·(H₂O) _{n- 1} + H₂O = OH^-·(H₂O) _n are calculated by the Monte-Carlo method with a large canonical ensemble for n = 1, ..., 20. The ion-waternonpair interaction potential was obtained by numerical fitting of calculated Gibbs energy and entropy of (H₂O)_n clusters (n = 1, ..., 5) to experimental ones. A good fit to experiment both of the internal energy and the Gibbs energy can be obtained in terms of a model allowing for nonpair interaction. It is shown that constructing an ion-water interaction potential without allowance for the entropy factor can lead to considerable errors in the Gibbs energy of cluster formation and in the nucleation rate.