Derivations with power central values on Lie ideals in prime rings

Let R be a prime ring of char R ≠ 2 with a nonzero derivation d and let U be its noncentral Lie ideal. If for some fixed integers n ₁ ⩾ 0, n ₂ ⩾ 0, n ₃ ⩾ 0, (u ⁿ¹ [d(u), u]u ⁿ²) ⁿ³ ∈ Z(R) for all u ∈ U, then R satisfies S ₄, the standard identity in four variables.     

Strong commutativity preserving generalized derivations on Lie ideals

We apply elementary matrix computations and the theory of differential identities to prove the following: let R be a prime ring with extended centroid C and L a noncommutative Lie ideal of R. Suppose that f?:?L?→?R is a map and g is a generalized derivation of R such that [f(x),?g(y)]?=?[x,?y] for all x,?y?∈?L. Then there exist a nonzero α?∈?C and a map μ?:?L?→?C such that g(x)?=?αx for all x?∈?R and f(x)?=?α^?1 x?+?μ(x) for all x?∈?L, except when R???M ₂(F), the 2?×?2 matrix ring over a field F.     

A result concerning nilpotent values with generalized skew derivations on Lie ideals

ABSTRACT

Let n≥1 be a fixed integer, R a prime ring with its right Martindale quotient ring Q, C the extended centroid, and L a non-central Lie ideal of R. If F is a generalized skew derivation of R such that (F(x)F(y)?yx)ⁿ = 0 for all x,y∈L, then char(R) = 2 and R?M₂(C), the ring of 2×2 matrices over C.     

Vanishing and cocentralizing generalized derivations on Lie ideals

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, U its right Utumi quotient ring, C its extended centroid and L a not central Lie ideal of R. Suppose that F, G and H are generalized derivations of R, with F≠0, such that F(G(x)x?xH(x)) = 0, for any x∈L. In this paper we describe all possible forms of F, G and H.     

Minimal prime ideals of reduced rings

Let R be a reduced ring with Q its Martindale symmetric ring of quotients, and let B be the complete Boolean algebra of all idempotents in C, where C is the extended centroid of R. It is proved that every minimal prime ideal of R must be of the form mQ∩R for some maximal ideal m of B but the converse is in general not true. In addition, if R is centrally closed or has only finitely many minimal prime ideals, then the converse also holds. By applying the explicit expression, many properties of minimal prime ideals of reduced rings are realized more easily.     

Vanishing power values of commutators with derivations

Let R be a prime ring of char R ≠ 2, let d be a nonzero derivation of R, and let ρ be a nonzero right ideal of R such that [[d(x)x ⁿ , d(y)] _m , [y, x] _s ] ^t = 0 for all x, y ? ρ, where n ≥ 1, m ≥ 0, s ≥ 0, and t ≥ 1 are fixed integers. If [ρ, ρ]ρ ≠ 0 then d(ρ)ρ = 0.     

On Lie ideals with generalized derivations

Let R be a prime ring with characteristic different from 2, let U be a nonzero Lie ideal of R, and let f be a generalized derivation associated with d. We prove the following results: (i) If a ∈ R and [a, f(U)] = 0 then a ∈ Z or d(a) = 0 or U ? Z; (ii) If f ²(U) = 0 then U ? Z; (iii) If u ² ∈ U for all u ∈ U and f acts as a homomorphism or antihomomorphism on U then either d = 0 or U ? Z.     

Strong commutativity-preserving generalized derivations on semiprime rings

Let R be a ring with a subset S. A mapping of R into itself is called strong commutativitypreserving （scp） on S, if [f（x）, f（y）] = [x, y] for all x, y ∈ S. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the structure of the generalized derivations which are scp on some ideals and right ideals of a prime ring, respectively. The semiprime case is also considered.     

Cocentralizing and vanishing derivations on multilinear polynomials in prime rings

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2 and extended centroid C and let f(x1,..., x _n ) be a multilinear polynomial over C not central-valued on R, while δ is a nonzero derivation of R. Suppose that d and g are derivations of R such that

$\delta (d(f(r_1 , \ldots ,r_n ))f(r_1 , \ldots ,r_n ) - f(r_1 , \ldots ,r_n )g(f(r_1 , \ldots ,r_n ))) = 0$

for all r1,..., r _n ∈ R. Then d and g are both inner derivations on R and one of the following holds: (1) d = g = 0; (2) d = ?g and f(x ₁,..., x _n )² is central-valued on R.

     

Vanishing Derivations and Co-Centralizing Generalized Derivations on Multilinear Polynomials in Prime Rings

Let R be a noncommutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2 with Utumi quotient ring U and extended centroid C, and f(x₁,…, x_n) be a multilinear polynomial over C, which is not central valued on R. Suppose that F and G are two generalized derivations of R and d is a nonzero derivation of R such that d(F(f(r))f(r) ? f(r)G(f(r))) = 0 for all r = (r₁,…, r_n) ∈ Rⁿ, then one of the following holds:

1. There exist a, p, q, c ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = ax + xp + λx, G(x) = px + xq and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with [c, a ? q] = 0 and f(x₁,…, x_n)² is central valued on R;

2. There exists a ∈ U such that F(x) = xa and G(x) = ax for all x ∈ R;

3. There exist a, b, c ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = λx + xa ? bx, G(x) = ax + xb and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with b + αc ∈ C for some α ∈C;

4. R satisfies s₄ and there exist a, b ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = λx + xa ? bx and G(x) = ax + xb for all x ∈ R;

5. There exist a′, b, c ∈ U and δ a derivation of R such that F(x) = a′x + xb ? δ(x), G(x) = bx + δ(x) and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with [c, a′] = 0 and f(x₁,…, x_n)² is central valued on R.