Asymptotic behaviour of the minima to a class of optimization problems for differential inclusions

Denoting byS _k (ξ _k ) the set of solutions of the Cauchy problem $\dot x \in F_k (t,x),x(0) = \xi _k $ , fork∈N∪{∞}, we prove that, under appropriate assumptions, the sequence {S _k (ξ _k )} _{k ∈ N} converges toS _∞(∈_∞) in the Kuratowski sense as well as in the Mosco sense. This result together with some facts from Γ-convergence theory are used to prove a result concerning the existence and the asymptotic behavior of the minima to the optimization problem $$\min \int_0^T {[g_k (t,x(t)) + h_k (t,\dot x(t))]} dt + \psi _k (\xi ),x \in S_k (\xi ),\xi \in K$$ withK a compact subset ofR ⁿ .     

Some remarks on the existence of optimal controls for quasilinear systems

Let a quasilinear control system having the state space \(\bar X \subseteq R^n \) be governed by the vector differential equation $$\dot x = G(u(t))x,$$ wherex(0) =x ₀ andU is the family of all bounded measurable functions from [0,T] intoU, a compact and convex subset ofR ^m.LetG:U ?R be a bounded measurable nonlinear function, such thatG(U) is compact and convex.G ^?1 can be convex onG(U) or concave. The main results of the paper establish the existence of a controlu ∈U which minimizes the cost functional $$I(u) = \int_0^T {L(u(t))x(t)dt,} $$ whereL(·) is convex. A practical example of application for chemical reactions is worked out in detail.     

A limit theorem for matrix-solutions of Hamiltonian systems

The following limit theorem on Hamiltonian systems (resp. corresponding Riccati matrix equations) is shown: Given(N, N)-matrices,A, B, C andn ∈ {1,…, N} with the following properties:A and kemelB(x) are constant, rank(I, A, …, A ^n?1) B(x)≠N,B(x)∈C _n(R), andB(x)(A ^T)^j-1 C(x)∈C _n-j(R) forj=1, …, n. Then \(\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to x_0 } \eta _1^T \left( x \right)V\left( x \right)U^{ - 1} \left( x \right)\eta _2 \left( x \right) = d_1^T \left( {x_0 } \right)U\left( {x_0 } \right)d_2 \) forx ₀∈R, whenever the matricesU(x), V(x) are a conjoined basis of the differential systemU′=AU + BV, V′=CU?A ^TV, and whenever η_i(x)∈R ^N satisfy η_i(x ₀)=U(x ₀)d _i ∈ imageU(x ₀) η′_i-Aη_ni(x) ∈ imageB(x),B(x)(η′_i(x)-Aη_i(x)) ∈C _n-1 R fori=1,2.     

Narrowness implies uniformity

This paper is about varietiesV of universal algebras which satisfy the following numerical condition on the spectrum: there are only finitely many prime integersp such thatp is a divisor of the cardinality of some finite algebra inV. Such varieties are callednarrow. The variety (or equational class) generated by a classK of similar algebras is denoted by V(K)=HSPK. We define Pr (K) as the set of prime integers which divide the cardinality of a (some) finite member ofK. We callK narrow if Pr (K) is finite. The key result proved here states that for any finite setK of finite algebras of the same type, the following are equivalent: (1) SPK is a narrow class. (2) V(K) has uniform congruence relations. (3) SK has uniform congruences and (3) SK has permuting congruences. (4) Pr (V(K))= Pr(SK). A varietyV is calleddirectly representable if there is a finite setK of finite algebras such thatV= V(K) and such that all finite algebras inV belong to PK. An equivalent definition states thatV is finitely generated and, up to isomorphism,V has only finitely many finite directly indecomposable algebras. Directly representable varieties are narrow and hence congruence modular. The machinery of modular commutators is applied in this paper to derive the following results for any directly representable varietyV. Each finite, directly indecomposable algebra inV is either simple or abelian.V satisfies the commutator identity [x,y]=x·y·[1,1] holding for congruencesx andy over any member ofV. The problem of characterizing finite algebras which generate directly representable varieties is reduced to a problem of ring theory on which there exists an extensive literature: to characterize those finite ringsR with identity element for which the variety of all unitary leftR-modules is directly representable. (In the terminology of [7], the condition is thatR has finite representation type.) We show that the directly representable varieties of groups are precisely the finitely generated abelian varieties, and that a finite, subdirectly irreducible, ring generates a directly representable variety iff the ring is a field or a zero ring.     

A generalization of the katona theorem for crosst-intersecting families

LetX be ann-element set and letA and? be families of subsets ofX. We say thatA and? are crosst-intersecting if |A ∩ B| ≥ t holds for all A ∈A and for allB ∈ ?. Suppose thatA and ? are crosst-intersecting. This paper first proves a crosst-intersecting version of Harper's Theorem:

1. There are two crosst-intersecting Hamming spheresA ₀,? ₀ with centerX such that |A| ≤ |A ₀| and|?| ≤ |? ₀| hold.
2. Suppose thatt ≥ 2 and that the pair of integers (|A) is maximal with respect to direct product ordering among pairs of crosst-intersecting families. Then,A and? are Hamming spheres with centerX.

Using these claims, the following conjecture of Frankl is proven:

1. Ifn + t = 2k ? 1 then |A| |?| ≤ max \(\left\{ {\left( {K_k^n + \left( {_{k - 1}^{n - 1} } \right)} \right)^2 ,K_k^n K_{k - 1}^n } \right\}\) holds, whereK _l ⁿ is defined as \(\left( {_n^n } \right)\left( {_{n - 1}^n } \right) + \cdots + \left( {_l^n } \right).\)
2. Ifn + t = 2k then |A| |? ≤ (K _k ⁿ )² holds.

The extremal configurations are also determined.     

Regularity property of Donsker's delta function

LetL be the space of rapidly decreasing smooth functions on ? andL ^* its dual space. Let (L ²)⁺ and (L ²)^? be the spaces of test Brownian functionals and generalized Brownian functionals, respectively, on the white noise spaceL ^* with standard Gaussian measure. The Donsker delta functionδ(B(t)?x) is in (L ²)^? and admits the series representation $$\delta (B(t) - x) = (2\pi t)^{ - 1/2} \exp ( - x^2 /2t)\sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {(n!2^n )^{ - 1} H_n (x/\sqrt {2t} )} \times H_n (B(t)/\sqrt {2t} )$$ , whereH _n is the Hermite polynomial of degreen. It is shown that forφ in (L ²)⁺,g _t,φ(x)≡〈δ(B(t)?x), φ〉 is inL and the linear map takingφ intog _t,φ is continuous from (L ²)⁺ intoL. This implies that forf inL ^* is a generalized Brownian functional and admits the series representation $$f(B(t)) = (2\pi t)^{ - 1/2} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {(n!2^n )^{ - 1} \langle f,\xi _{n, t} \rangle } H_n (B(t)/\sqrt {2t} )$$ , whereξ _n,t is the Hermite function of degreen with parametert. This series representation is used to prove the Ito lemma forf inL ^*, $$f(B(t)) = f(B(u)) + \int_u^t {\partial _s^ * } f'(B(s)) ds + (1/2)\int_u^t {f''} (B(s)) ds$$ , where? _s ^* is the adjoint of \(\dot B(s)\) -differentiation operator? _s .     

Power Majorization and Majorization of Sequences

Let \(\bar x\) , \(\bar y\ \in\ R_n\) be vectors which satisfy x₁ ≥ x₂ ≥ … ≥ x_n and y₁ ≥ y₂ >- … ≥ y_n and Σx_i = Σy_i. We say that \(\bar x\) is power majorized by \(\bar y\) if Σx_i ^p ≤ Σy_i ^p for all real p ? [0, 1] and Σx_i ^p ≥ Σy_i ^p for p ∈ [0, 1]. In this paper we give a classification of functions ? (which includes all possible positive polynomials) for which \(\bar\phi(\bar x) \leq \bar\phi(\bar y)\) (see definition below) when \(\bar x\) is power majorized \(\bar y\) . We also answer a question posed by Clausing by showing that there are vectors \(\bar x\) , \(\bar y\ \in\ R^n\) of any dimension n ≥ 4 for which there is a convex function ? such that \(\bar x\) is power majorized by \(\bar y\) and \(\bar\phi(\bar x)\ >\ \bar\phi(\bar y)\) .     

On multiplicative (generalized)-derivations in prime and semiprime rings

Let R be a ring. A map ${F : R \rightarrow R}$ F : R → R is called a multiplicative (generalized)-derivation if F(xy) = F(x)y + xg(y) is fulfilled for all ${x, y \in R}$ x , y ∈ R where ${g : R \rightarrow R}$ g : R → R is any map (not necessarily derivation). The main objective of the present paper is to study the following situations: (i) ${F(xy) \pm xy \in Z}$ F ( xy ) ± xy ∈ Z , (ii) ${F(xy) \pm yx \in Z}$ F ( xy ) ± yx ∈ Z , (iii) ${F(x)F(y) \pm xy \in Z}$ F ( x ) F ( y ) ± xy ∈ Z and (iv) ${F(x)F(y) \pm yx \in Z}$ F ( x ) F ( y ) ± yx ∈ Z for all x, y in some appropriate subset of R. Moreover, some examples are also given.     

О факториэации и о нулях преобраэовании Фуряе бесконечно дифференцируемых функции с компактным носителем

LetF denote the class of Fourier transforms of infinitely differentiable functions on the real line with compact support. We prove that if each zero of a functionF ∈ $F \in \mathcal{F}$ lies in the union of a horizontal strip with a finite number of semistrips, them a factorizationF=F ₁ F ₂ holds, where $F_1 ,F_2 \in \mathcal{F}$ . We give estimates of |F ₁(z)/F ₂(z)| from above and from below. The zero sets of functions fromF are described in terms of integral sequences.     

Elliptische Differentialgleichungen mit variablen Koeffizienten in Gebieten mit unbeschränktem Rand

We discuss the spectrum of a symmetric elliptic differential operator A with domain \(\mathop {H^m }\limits^o (\Omega ) \cap H^{2m} (\Omega )\) in regions Ω with unbounded boundary \(\dot \Omega \) , where are \(\bar \Omega \) uniformely of class C^2m and on \(\dot \Omega \) the normal condition x·ν(x)≦μ for sufficient small positiveμ. We prove the A-priori-estimate \(\parallel u\parallel _{m,\Omega } \leqq c\parallel (l + r) (A - k)u\parallel _{o,\Omega } \) and show for all k>k, k≧0 suitable, there are no eigenvalues of A and by characterizing weighted Sobolev spaces with negative norm the existence of solutions \((l + r)_2 ^{ - 1} u \in \mathop H\limits^0{^m} (\Omega ) \cap H^{2m} (\Omega )\) of the equation (A?k)u=f, (1+r)f∈L²(Ω).     

Index formulae for subspaces of Kreîn spaces

For a subspaceS of a Kreîn spaceK and an arbitrary fundamental decompositionK=K ^?[+]K ⁺ ofK, we prove the index formula $$\kappa ^ - \left( \mathcal{S} \right) + \dim \left( {\mathcal{S}^ \bot \cap \mathcal{K}^ + } \right) = \kappa ^ + \left( {\mathcal{S}^ \bot } \right) + \dim \left( {\mathcal{S} \cap \mathcal{K}^ - } \right)$$ where κ^±(S) stands for the positive/negative signature ofS. The difference dim(S∩K ^?)?dim(S ^⊥∩K ⁺), provided it is well defined, is called the index ofS. The formula turns out to unify other known index formulac for operators or subspaces in a Kreîn space.     

On the divergence of Lagrange interpolation processes on a set of second category

В статье даны полные д оказательства следу ющих утверждений. Пустьω — непрерывная неубывающая полуадд итивная функций на [0, ∞),ω(0)=0 и пусть M?[0, 1] — матрица узл ов интерполирования. Если $$\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{n \to \infty } \omega \left( {\frac{1}{n}} \right)\log n > 0$$ то существует точкаx ₀∈[0,1] и функцияf ∈ С[0,1] таки е, чтоω(f, δ)=О(ω(δ)), для которой $$\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{n \to \infty } |L_n (\mathfrak{M},f,x_0 ) - f(x_0 )| > 0$$ Если же $$\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{n \to \infty } \omega \left( {\frac{1}{n}} \right)\log n = \infty$$ , то существуют множес твоE второй категори и и функцияf ∈ С[0,1],ω(f, δ)=o(ω(δ)) та кие, что для всехx∈E $$\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{n \to \infty } |L_n (\mathfrak{M},f,x)| = \infty$$ . Исправлена погрешно сть, допущенная автор ом в [5], и отмеченная в работе П. Вертеши [9].     

The lower order of functions of the classB

The class of functions Φ(z, t) defined for z∈ Cⁿ and t ≥0 such that the functions Φ(z, ¦w¦), w∈C, are plurisubharmonic in Cⁿ⁺¹ is called the classD. A typical example of functions of the classB are functions of the form \(\ln M_g (z,t) = \mathop {\ln \sup |}\limits_{|w| = t} g(z,w)|\) where g(z, w), z∈Cⁿ, w∈C, is an entire function in Cⁿ⁺¹. In this note it is proved under certain restrictions on the function Φ(z, t)εB that its lower order relative to the variable t is the same for all z∈Cⁿ except, possibly, for the points z of a set of zero Γ capacity. See [5].     

Rational approximations of real numbers

For anyx ∈ r put $$c(x) = \overline {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to \infty } } \mathop {\min }\limits_{(p,q\mathop {) \in Z}\limits_{q \leqslant t} \times N} t\left| {qx - p} \right|.$$ . Let [x₀; x₁,..., x_n, ...] be an expansion of x into a continued fraction and let \(M = \{ x \in J,\overline {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } } x_n< \infty \}\) .Forx∈M put D(x)=c(x)/(1?c(x)). The structure of the set \(\mathfrak{D} = \{ D(x),x \in M\}\) is studied. It is shown that $$\mathfrak{D} \cap (3 + \sqrt 3 ,(5 + 3\sqrt 3 )/2) = \{ D(x^{(n,3} )\} _{n = 0}^\infty \nearrow (5 + 3\sqrt 3 )/2,$$ where \(x^{(n,3)} = [\overline {3;(1,2)_n ,1} ].\) This yields for \(\mu = \inf \{ z,\mathfrak{D} \supset (z, + \infty )\}\) (“origin of the ray”) the following lower bound: μ?(5+3√3)/2=5.0n>(5 + 3/3)/2=5.098.... Suppose a∈n. Put \(M(a) = \{ x \in M,\overline {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } } x_n = a\}\) , \(\mathfrak{D}(a) = \{ D(x),x \in M(a)\}\) . The smallest limit point of \(\mathfrak{D}(a)(a \geqslant 2)\) is found. The structure of (a) is studied completely up to the smallest limit point and elucidated to the right of it.     

Extreme instability of the horocycle flow

Let g be aC ³ negatively curved Riemannian metric on a compact connected orientable surfaceS. LetB be the collection of all metrics resulting from sufficiently small conformal changes of the metricg. (1) Then there is a constantA > 0 such that ifB then the \(\bar d\) distance between the horocycle flow? _t (Margulis parametrization) of (S, ?) and the rescaled horocycle flowh _ct of (S, g) is at leastA (?c > 0). No other dynamical system is known to have such extreme instability. (2) Fix ε > 0. Then there is anN > 0 so that if we are given samples {ξ} ₀ ^N {η} ₀ ^N which arose from the horocycle flows corresponding to two of the metrics?, g ∈B, then either the two samples are \(\bar d\) farther thanA/2 apart or the two surfaces are closer than ε. This holds even if these samples are slightly inaccurate.     

Radial functions and regularity of solutions to the Schrödinger equation

Letf be a radial function and setT ^* f(x)=sup_0<t<1 |T _t f(x)|, x ∈ ?ⁿ, n≥2, where(T_t f)^ (ξ)=e ^it|ξ|a \(\hat f\) (ξ),a > 1. We show that, ifB is the ball centered at the origin, of radius 100, then \(\int\limits_B {|T^ * f(x)|} dx \leqslant c(\int {|\hat f(\xi )|^2 (l + |\xi |^s )ds} )^{1/2} \) if and only ifs≥1/4.