New upper bounds for the chromatic number of a graph*

We show that for any graph G, the chromatic number χ(G) ≤ Δ₂(G) + 1, where Δ₂(G) is the largest degree that a vertex ν can have subject to the condition that ν is adjacent to a vertex whose degree is at least as big as its own. Moreover, we show that the upper bound is best possible in the the following sense: If Δ₂(G) ≥ 3, then to determine whether χ(G) ≤ Δ₂(G) is an NP‐complete problem. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 117–120, 2001     

The circular chromatic number of series‐parallel graphs

In this article, we consider the circular chromatic number χ_c(G) of series‐parallel graphs G. It is well known that series‐parallel graphs have chromatic number at most 3. Hence, their circular chromatic numbers are at most 3. If a series‐parallel graph G contains a triangle, then both the chromatic number and the circular chromatic number of G are indeed equal to 3. We shall show that if a series‐parallel graph G has girth at least 2 ⌊(3k − 1)/2⌋, then χ_c(G) ≤ 4k/(2k − 1). The special case k = 2 of this result implies that a triangle free series‐parallel graph G has circular chromatic number at most 8/3. Therefore, the circular chromatic number of a series‐parallel graph (and of a K₄‐minor free graph) is either 3 or at most 8/3. This is in sharp contrast to recent results of Moser [5] and Zhu [14], which imply that the circular chromatic number of K₅‐minor free graphs are precisely all rational numbers in the interval [2, 4]. We shall also construct examples to demonstrate the sharpness of the bound given in this article. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 33: 14–24, 2000     

Random lifts of graphs: Independence and chromatic number

For a graph G, a random n‐lift of G has the vertex set V(G)×[n] and for each edge [u, v] ∈ E(G), there is a random matching between {u}×[n] and {v}×[n]. We present bounds on the chromatic number and on the independence number of typical random lifts, with G fixed and n→∞. For the independence number, upper and lower bounds are obtained as solutions to certain optimization problems on the base graph. For a base graph G with chromatic number χ and fractional chromatic number χ_f, we show that the chromatic number of typical lifts is bounded from below by const ? and also by const ? χ_f/log²χ_f (trivially, it is bounded by χ from above). We have examples of graphs where the chromatic number of the lift equals χ almost surely, and others where it is a.s. O(χ/logχ). Many interesting problems remain open. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 20, 1–22, 2002     

Equitable coloring of random graphs

An equitable coloring of a graph is a proper vertex coloring such that the sizes of any two color classes differ by at most one. The least positive integer k for which there exists an equitable coloring of a graph G with k colors is said to be the equitable chromatic number of G and is denoted by χ₌(G). The least positive integer k such that for any k′ ≥ k there exists an equitable coloring of a graph G with k′ colors is said to be the equitable chromatic threshold of G and is denoted by χ₌*(G). In this paper, we investigate the asymptotic behavior of these coloring parameters in the probability space G(n,p) of random graphs. We prove that if n^?1/5+? < p < 0.99 for some 0 < ?, then almost surely χ(G(n,p)) ≤ χ₌(G(n,p)) = (1 + o(1))χ(G(n,p)) holds (where χ(G(n,p)) is the ordinary chromatic number of G(n,p)). We also show that there exists a constant C such that if C/n < p < 0.99, then almost surely χ(G(n,p)) ≤ χ₌(G(n,p)) ≤ (2 + o(1))χ(G(n,p)). Concerning the equitable chromatic threshold, we prove that if n^?(1??) < p < 0.99 for some 0 < ?, then almost surely χ(G(n,p)) ≤ χ₌* (G(n,p)) ≤ (2 + o(1))χ(G(n,p)) holds, and if < p < 0.99 for some 0 < ?, then almost surely we have χ(G(n,p)) ≤ χ₌*(G(n,p)) = O_?(χ(G(n,p))). © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2009     

Posets and planar graphs

A k-decomposition (G₁,…,G_k) of a graph G is a partition of its edge set to form k spanning subgraphs G₁,…,G_k. The classical theorem of Nordhaus and Gaddum bounds χ(G₁) + χ(G₂) and χ(G₁)χ(G₂) over all 2-decompositions of K_n. For a graph parameter p, let p(k;G) denote the maximum of over all k-decompositions of the graph G. The clique number ω, chromatic number χ, list chromatic number χℓ, and Szekeres–Wilf number σ satisfy ω(2;K_n) = χ(2;K_n) = χℓ(2;K_n) = σ(2;K_n) = n + 1. We obtain lower and upper bounds for ω(k;K_n), χ(k;K_n), χℓ(k;K_n), and σ(k;K_n). The last three behave differently for large k. We also obtain lower and upper bounds for the maximum of χ(k;G) over all graphs embedded on a given surface. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Minimum degree thresholds for bipartite graph tiling

Given a bipartite graph H and a positive integer n such that v(H) divides 2n, we define the minimum degree threshold for bipartite H‐tiling, δ₂(n, H), as the smallest integer k such that every bipartite graph G with n vertices in each partition and minimum degree δ(G)≥k contains a spanning subgraph consisting of vertex‐disjoint copies of H. Zhao, Hladký‐Schacht, Czygrinow‐DeBiasio determined δ₂(n, K_{s, t}) exactly for all s?t and suffi‐ciently large n. In this article we determine δ₂(n, H), up to an additive constant, for all bipartite H and sufficiently large n. Additionally, we give a corresponding minimum degree threshold to guarantee that G has an H‐tiling missing only a constant number of vertices. Our δ₂(n, H) depends on either the chromatic number χ(H) or the critical chromatic number χ_cr(H), while the threshold for the almost perfect tiling only depends on χ_cr(H). These results can be viewed as bipartite analogs to the results of Kuhn and Osthus [Combinatorica 29 (2009), 65–107] and of Shokoufandeh and Zhao [Rand Struc Alg 23 (2003), 180–205]. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Circular choosability of graphs

This paper discusses the circular version of list coloring of graphs. We give two definitions of the circular list chromatic number (or circular choosability) χ_{c, l}(G) of a graph G and prove that they are equivalent. Then we prove that for any graph G, χ_{c, l}(G) ≥ χ_l(G) ? 1. Examples are given to show that this bound is sharp in the sense that for any ? 0, there is a graph G with χ_{c, l}(G) > χ_l(G) ? 1 + ?. It is also proved that k‐degenerate graphs G have χ_{c, l}(G) ≤ 2k. This bound is also sharp: for each ? < 0, there is a k‐degenerate graph G with χ_{c, l}(G) ≥ 2k ? ?. This shows that χ_{c, l}(G) could be arbitrarily larger than χ_l(G). Finally we prove that if G has maximum degree k, then χ_{c, l}(G) ≤ k + 1. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 48: 210–218, 2005     

Edge‐face chromatic number and edge chromatic number of simple plane graphs

Given a simple plane graph G, an edge‐face k‐coloring of G is a function ? : E(G) ∪ F(G) → {1,…,k} such that, for any two adjacent or incident elements a, b ∈ E(G) ∪ F(G), ?(a) ≠ ?(b). Let χ_e(G), χ_ef(G), and Δ(G) denote the edge chromatic number, the edge‐face chromatic number, and the maximum degree of G, respectively. In this paper, we prove that χ_ef(G) = χ_e(G) = Δ(G) for any 2‐connected simple plane graph G with Δ (G) ≥ 24. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Game coloring the Cartesian product of graphs

This article proves the following result: Let G and G′ be graphs of orders n and n′, respectively. Let G^* be obtained from G by adding to each vertex a set of n′ degree 1 neighbors. If G^* has game coloring number m and G′ has acyclic chromatic number k, then the Cartesian product G□G′ has game chromatic number at most k(k + m ? 1). As a consequence, the Cartesian product of two forests has game chromatic number at most 10, and the Cartesian product of two planar graphs has game chromatic number at most 105. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 59: 261–278, 2008     

Maximal σ‐polynomials of connected 3‐chromatic graphs

In the set of graphs of order n and chromatic number k the following partial order relation is defined. One says that a graph G is less than a graph H if c_i(G) ≤ c_i(H) holds for every i, k ≤ i ≤ n and at least one inequality is strict, where c_i(G) denotes the number of i‐color partitions of G. In this paper the first ? n/2 ? levels of the diagram of the partially ordered set of connected 3‐chromatic graphs of order n are described. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 43: 210–222, 2003     

On the complexity of the circular chromatic number

Circular chromatic number, χ_c is a natural generalization of chromatic number. It is known that it is NP ‐hard to determine whether or not an arbitrary graph G satisfies χ(G)=χ_c(G). In this paper we prove that this problem is NP ‐hard even if the chromatic number of the graph is known. This answers a question of Xuding Zhu. Also we prove that for all positive integers k ≥ 2 and n ≥ 3, for a given graph G with χ(G) = n, it is NP ‐complete to verify if . © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 47: 226–230, 2004     

List‐coloring the square of a subcubic graph

The square G² of a graph G is the graph with the same vertex set G and with two vertices adjacent if their distance in G is at most 2. Thomassen showed that every planar graph G with maximum degree Δ(G) = 3 satisfies χ(G²) ≤ 7. Kostochka and Woodall conjectured that for every graph, the list‐chromatic number of G² equals the chromatic number of G², that is, χ_l(G²) = χ(G²) for all G. If true, this conjecture (together with Thomassen's result) implies that every planar graph G with Δ(G) = 3 satisfies χ_l(G²) ≤ 7. We prove that every connected graph (not necessarily planar) with Δ(G) = 3 other than the Petersen graph satisfies χ_l(G²) ≤8 (and this is best possible). In addition, we show that if G is a planar graph with Δ(G) = 3 and girth g(G) ≥ 7, then χ_l(G²) ≤ 7. Dvo?ák, ?krekovski, and Tancer showed that if G is a planar graph with Δ(G) = 3 and girth g(G) ≥ 10, then χ_l(G²) ≤6. We improve the girth bound to show that if G is a planar graph with Δ(G) = 3 and g(G) ≥ 9, then χ_l(G²) ≤ 6. All of our proofs can be easily translated into linear‐time coloring algorithms. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 57: 65–87, 2008     

A note on the bichromatic numbers of graphs

For a pair of integers k, l≥0, a graph G is (k, l)‐colorable if its vertices can be partitioned into at most k independent sets and at most l cliques. The bichromatic number χ^b(G) of G is the least integer r such that for all k, l with k+l=r, G is (k, l)‐colorable. The concept of bichromatic numbers simultaneously generalizes the chromatic number χ(G) and the clique covering number θ(G), and is important in studying the speed of hereditary properties and edit distances of graphs. It is easy to see that for every graph G the bichromatic number χ^b(G) is bounded above by χ(G)+θ(G)?1. In this article, we characterize all graphs G for which the upper bound is attained, i.e., χ^b(G)=χ(G)+θ(G)?1. It turns out that all these graphs are cographs and in fact they are the critical graphs with respect to the (k, l)‐colorability of cographs. More specifically, we show that a cograph H is not (k, l)‐colorable if and only if H contains an induced subgraph G with χ(G)=k+1, θ(G)=l+1 and χ^b(G)=k+l+1. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65: 263–269, 2010     

Proof of a tiling conjecture of Komlós

A conjecture of Komlós states that for every graph H, there is a constant K such that if G is any n‐vertex graph of minimum degree at least (1 ? (1/χ_cr(H)))n, where χ_cr(H) denotes the critical chromatic number of H, then G contains an H‐matching that covers all but at most K vertices of G. In this paper we prove that the conjecture holds for all sufficiently large values of n. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 23: 180–205, 2003     

Vizing's coloring algorithm and the fan number

Most upper bounds for the chromatic index of a graph come from algorithms that produce edge colorings. One such algorithm was invented by Vizing [Diskret Analiz 3 (1964), 25–30] in 1964. Vizing's algorithm colors the edges of a graph one at a time and never uses more than Δ+µ colors, where Δ is the maximum degree and µ is the maximum multiplicity, respectively. In general, though, this upper bound of Δ+µ is rather generous. In this paper, we define a new parameter fan(G) in terms of the degrees and the multiplicities of G. We call fan(G) the fan number of G. First we show that the fan number can be computed by a polynomial‐time algorithm. Then we prove that the parameter Fan(G)=max{Δ(G), fan(G)} is an upper bound for the chromatic index that can be realized by Vizing's coloring algorithm. Many of the known upper bounds for the chromatic index are also upper bounds for the fan number. Furthermore, we discuss the following question. What is the best (efficiently realizable) upper bound for the chromatic index in terms of Δ and µ ? Goldberg's Conjecture supports the conjecture that χ′+1 is the best efficiently realizable upper bound for χ′ at all provided that P ≠ NP . © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65: 115–138, 2010     

Total domination in 2‐connected graphs and in graphs with no induced 6‐cycles

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number γ_t(G) of G. It is known [J Graph Theory 35 (2000), 21–45] that if G is a connected graph of order n > 10 with minimum degree at least 2, then γ_t(G) ≤ 4n/7 and the (infinite family of) graphs of large order that achieve equality in this bound are characterized. In this article, we improve this upper bound of 4n/7 for 2‐connected graphs, as well as for connected graphs with no induced 6‐cycle. We prove that if G is a 2‐connected graph of order n > 18, then γ_t(G) ≤ 6n/11. Our proof is an interplay between graph theory and transversals in hypergraphs. We also prove that if G is a connected graph of order n > 18 with minimum degree at least 2 and no induced 6‐cycle, then γ_t(G) ≤ 6n/11. Both bounds are shown to be sharp. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 60: 55–79, 2009     

Lower bounds for the clique and the chromatic numbers of a graph

G is any simple graph with m edges and n vertices where these vertices have vertex degrees d(1)≥d(2)≥?≥d(n), respectively. General algorithms for the exact calculation of χ(G), the chromatic number of G, are almost always of ‘branch and bound’ type; this type of algorithm requires an easily constructed lower bound for χ(G). In this paper it is shown that, for a number of such bounds (many of which are described here for the first time), the bound does not exceed cl(G) where cl(G) is the clique number of G.In 1972 Myers and Liu showed that cl(G)≥n?(n?2m?n). Here we show that cl(G)≥ n?[n?(2m?n)(1+c²_v)^{$\text{1}\text{2}$}], where c_v is the vertex degree coefficient of variation in G, that cl(G)≥ Bondy's constructive lower bound for χ(G), and that cl(G)≥n?(n?W(G)), where W(G) is the largest positive integer such that W(G)≤d(W(G)+1) [W(G)+1 is the Welsh and Powell upper bound for χ(G)]. It is also shown that cl(G)+$\text{1}\text{3}$>n?(n?L(G))≥n?(n?λ₁) and that χ(G)≥ n?(n?λ₁); λ₁ is the largest eigenvalue of A, the adjacency matrix of G, and L(G) is a newly defined single-valued function of G similar to W(G) in its construction from the vertex degree sequence of G [L(G)≥W(G)].Finally, a ‘greedy’ lower bound for cl(G) is constructed from A and it is shown that this lower bound is never less than Bondy's bound; thereafter, for 150 random graphs with varying numbers of vertices and edge densities, the values of lower bounds given in this paper are listed, thereby illustrating that this last greedily obtained lower bound is almost always better than each of the other bounds.     

Incidence coloring of the squares of some graphs

The incidence chromatic number of G, denoted by χ_i(G), is the least number of colors such that G has an incidence coloring. In this paper, we determine the incidence chromatic number of the powers of paths, trees, which are min{n,2k+1}, and Δ(T²)+1, respectively. For the square of a Halin graph, we give an upper bound of its incidence chromatic number.