Solid–Gas Hydrogenation of Hex-3-yne and 1,4-Cyclohexadiene in the Presence of Ru3(CO)9(μ-H)(μ-PPh2), Ru3(CO)10(μ-H)(μ-PPh2), Ru3(CO)7(μ-PPh2)2(C6H4), and Ru4(CO)11(μ4-PPh)(C6H4) Deposited on Pyrex Glass, Silica, and Alumina

The title complexes were tested in the hydrogenation of hex-3-yne and of 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexadiene (CHD) under solid–gas conditions. The clusters were deposited on three “standard” supports, that is, pyrex glass, alumina, and silica. All the clusters, particularly (μ-H)Ru₃(CO)₁₀(PPh₂), show hydrogenation activity. However, they are not particularly selective toward the formation of monoenes; “disproportionation” of 1,3- and 1,4-CHD to hydrogenated products and benzene also occurs. The hydrogenation activity of the clusters is dependent on their nature, the type of substrate, and the characteristics of the supporting material; silica and pyrex glass are usually more active than alumina. Attempts at detecting the formation of organometallic intermediates or by-products (through IR spectroscopy) were made. HRTEM was used to check for eventual decomposition on some supports.     

Synthesis and protonation of an OS3(μ-H)(CO)10(μ-σ,η2-C≡CCMe2OMe) cluster

Triosmium cluster Os₃(-H)(CO)₁₀(--²-CCC Me₂OMe) (1) was obtained by treating OS₃(-H)(-Cl)(CO)₁₀ with LiCCCMe₂OMe. The reaction of cluster1 with HBF₄ · Et₂O at –60 °C leads to the cationic complex [Os₃(-H)(CO)₁₀(-,,²-C=C=C Me₂)]⁺BF₄ ^– (2) with an allenylidene ligand. The^s1H and¹³C NMR spectra of complex2 reveal the temperature dependence caused by migration of hydrocarbon and carbonyl ligands. Thermodynamic parameters were obtained for be exchange process of the allenylidene ligand.Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 12, pp, 2990–2992, December, 1996.     

KINETICS AND MECHANISM FOR INTRAMOLECULAR ISOMERIZATION OF HRu3 (μ3-η3-EtSCCMeCMe)(CO)9 TO Ru3(μ-SEt) (μ3-η3-CCMeCHMe)(CO)9

Abstract

The kinetics for isomerization of HRu₃ (μ₃-η³-EtSCCMeCMe)(CO)₉ TO Ru₃(μ-SEt) (μ₃-η³-CCMeCHMe)(CO)₉, were determined. The overall process involves C[sbnd]H elimination, C[sbnd]S and Ru[sbnd]Ru bond cleavage and Ru₂(μ-S) bond formation. Activation parameters were determined from the temperature dependence (ΔH^? = 127(3) kJ/mol, ΔS^?= 56(11) J/mol-K) and from the pressure dependence (0[sbnd]207 MPa, ΔV^? ₀ +12.7(1.1) cm³/mol, Δβ^? = +0.037(0.012) cm³/(mol-MPa)) of the rate constant. The data are consistent with an intramolecular reaction involving significant metal-metal or carbon-sulfur bond cleavage in the transition state. The activation volume is too large to be accommodated by C[sbnd]H elimination alone and CO dissociation is not involved.     

Reactions of 1,4-difeffocenylbuta-1,3-diyne and 1,4-diphenylbut-l-en-3-yne with Ru3(CO)12. Crystal structure of Ru3(CO)8(μ3-η-1-η1-η4-η2-C4Ph2(CH=CHPh)2)

Diyne FcCmCC.CFc (Fc is ferrocenyl) reacts with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in boiling hexane to yield binuclear complexes Ru₂ and Ru₂(CO)₆(C₄Fc₂(C=CFc)₂C=O) containing ruthenacyclopentadiene and diruthenacycloheptadienone rings, respectively. The isomerism of the complexes is due to the different ways of coupling of the alkyne fragments of the diyne, namely, head-to-head, head-to-tail or tail-to-tail. The reaction of enyne PhC=CCH=CHPh with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ under similar conditions gives isomeric binuclear complexes Ru₂(CO)₆(C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂) and trinuclear clusters Ru₃(CO)₆(w-CO)₂(C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂) and Ru₃(CO)₈(₃-,¹-¹-⁴-² C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂). The structure of the latter was determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. The Ru₃ triangle coordinates eight terminal CO groups and the organic ligand resulting from the head-to-head dimerization of enyne molecules; the ruthenacyclopentadiene moiety is ⁴-coordinated to the Ru(CO)₂ group, and the third ruthenium atom is 2-bound to one of the PhCH=CH groups.Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 5, pp. 1261–1267, May, 1996.     

Reactions of Unsaturated Quinoline Triosmium Clusters [Os3(CO)9(μ3-η2-C9H5(4-R)N)(μ-H)] (R=Me or H) with Tetramethylthiourea: X-ray Structures of [Os3(CO)8(μ-η2-C9H5(4-Me)N)(η2-SC(NMe2NCH2Me)(μ-H)2] and [Os3(CO)9(μ-η2-C9H6N)(η1-SC(NMe2)2)(μ-H)]

Treatment of the electronically unsaturated 4-methylquinoline triosmium cluster $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu_3\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-}\hbox{C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{5} \hbox{(4-Me)N})(\upmu\hbox{-H})]$ (1) with tetramethylthiourea in refluxing cyclohexane at 81°C gave $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{8}(\upmu\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{5} \hbox{(4-Me)N})(\upeta^2\hbox{-SC}(\hbox{NMe}_2\hbox{NCH}_2\hbox{Me})(\upmu \hbox{-H})_2]$ (2) and $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{5}\hbox{(4-Me)N})(\upeta^1\hbox{-SC}(\hbox{NMe}_2)_2)(\upmu\hbox{-H})]$ (3). In contrast, a similar reaction of the corresponding quinoline compound $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu_{3}\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{6}\hbox{N})(\upmu\hbox{-H})]$ (4) with tetramethylthiourea afforded $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{6}\hbox{N})(\upeta^{1}\hbox{-SC(NMe}_{2})_{2})(\upmu\hbox{-H)}]$ (5) as the only product. Compound 2 contains a cyclometallated tetramethylthiourea ligand which is chelating at the rear osmium atom and a quinolyl ligand coordinated to the Os₃ triangle via the nitrogen lone pair and the C(8) atom of the carbocyclic ring. In 3 and 5, the tetramethylthiourea ligand is coordinated at an equatorial site of the osmium atom, which is also bound to the carbon atom of the quinolyl ligand. Compounds 3 and 5 react with PPh₃ at room temperature to give the previously reported phosphine substituted products $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu \hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{5}\hbox{(4-Me)N)(PPh}_{3})(\upmu\hbox{-H)}]$ (6) and $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO}_{9}(\upmu \hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{6}\hbox{N)(PPh}_{3})(\upmu\hbox{-H)}]$ (7) by the displacement of the tetramethylthiourea ligand.     

Studies pertaining to the mechanism of “Pt(PCy3)“ addition. The reaction of MPt(μ-H)(μ-PnPr2)Pt(CO)(PCy3) with Pt(C2H4)2(PCy3)

The reaction of Pt(C₂H₄)₂(PCy₃) with (OC)₄M(μ-H)(μ-PⁿPr₂)Pt(CO)(PCy₃, (1: M  Cr, Mo, W) occurs in a highly specific, kinetically controlled manner to give MPt₂(μ²_MPt-CO)(η²_PtPt-H)(μ²_MPt-PⁿPr₂)(CO)₄ (PCy₃)₂ (5), as the first formed trimer. The trimer 5 (M  Mo, W) isomerizes to give MPt₂(μ²_PtPt-CO) ((μ²_MPtH)(μ²_MPt-PⁿPr₂)(CO)₄)PCy₃)₂ (6) which in turn isomerizes to MPt₂μ²_MPtCO)(μ²_MPt (μ²_PtPt-PⁿPr₂)(CO)₄(PCy₃)₂ (7, as the final isolable product. These results provide a detailed insight into the mechanism of “Pt(PCy₃) addition”, a cluster assembly process.     

Protonation and acylation of the heterometallic complexes (μ-H)Os3(μ-O2CC5H4FeCp)(CO)10 and Fe{(μ-O2CC5H4)(μ-H)Os3(CO)10}2

The reactions of the heterometallic complexes (-H)Os₃(-O₂CC₅H₄FeCp)(CO)₁₀ (1) and Fe{(-O₂CC₅H₄)(-H)Os₃(CO)₁₀}₂ (2) with CF₃COOH, CF₃SO₃H, and AcCl were studied. The reaction of 1 with CF₃COOH involves interaction with the Cp ligands, protonation of the O atom of the bridging carboxylate group, and oxidative degradation of the complex. At low concentrations, CF₃SO₃H protonates the O atom of the bridging carboxylate group, while at high concentrations, degradation of the complex takes place. The reaction of complex 2with either CF₃COOH or low concentrations of CF₃SO₃H results in successive elimination of two [(-H)Os₃(CO)₁₀] cluster fragments due to protonation of the O atoms of the carboxylate groups. In the case of high CF₃SO₃H concentrations, the Os—Os bonds of both cluster fragments of 2 are also protonated to give the [Fe{(-O₂CC₅H₄)(-H)₂Os₃(CO)₁₀}₂]²⁺ dication. The Friedel—Crafts acylation of 1 takes place only when a large excess of AcCl and AlCl₃ is used to give two new complexes, (-H)Os₃(-O₂CC₅H₄FeC₅H₄C(O)CH₃)(CO)₁₀ and (-H)Os₃(-O₂CC₅H₃C(O)CH₃FeCp)(CO)₁₀ in a 2 : 1 ratio.     

Comparison of the Bonding of Benzene and C60 to a Metal Cluster: Ru3(CO)9(μ3-η2,η 2,η2-C6H6) and Ru3(CO)9(μ3-η2,η2,η2-C60)

The electron distributions and bonding in Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆H₆) and Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) are examined via electronic structure calculations in order to compare the nature of ligation of benzene and buckminsterfullerene to the common Ru₃(CO)₉ inorganic cluster. A fragment orbital approach, which is aided by the relatively high symmetry that these molecules possess, reveals important features of the electronic structures of these two systems. Reported crystal structures show that both benzene and C₆₀ are geometrically distorted when bound to the metal cluster fragment, and our ab initio calculations indicate that the energies of these distortions are similar. The experimental Ru–C_fullerene bond lengths are shorter than the corresponding Ru–C_benzene distances and the Ru–Ru bond lengths are longer in the fullerene-bound cluster than for the benzene-ligated cluster. Also, the carbonyl stretching frequencies are slightly higher for Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) than for Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆H₆). As a whole, these observations suggest that electron density is being pulled away from the metal centers and CO ligands to form stronger Ru–C_fullerene than Ru–C_benzene bonds. Fenske-Hall molecular orbital calculations show that an important interaction is donation of electron density in the metal–metal bonds to empty orbitals of C₆₀ and C₆H₆. Bonds to the metal cluster that result from this interaction are the second highest occupied orbitals of both systems. A larger amount of density is donated to C₆₀ than to C₆H₆, thus accounting for the longer metal–metal bonds in the fullerene-bound cluster. The principal metal–arene bonding modes are the same in both systems, but the more band-like electronic structure of the fullerene (i.e., the greater number density of donor and acceptor orbitals in a given energy region) as compared to C₆H₆ permits a greater degree of electron flow and stronger bonding between the Ru₃(CO)₉ and C₆₀ fragments. Of significance to the reduction chemistry of M₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) molecules, the HOMO is largely localized on the metal–carbonyl fragment and the LUMO is largely localized on the C₆₀ portion of the molecule. The localized C₆₀ character of the LUMO is consistent with the similarity of the first two reductions of this class of molecules to the first two reductions of free C₆₀. The set of orbitals above the LUMO shows partial delocalization (in an antibonding sense) to the metal fragment, thus accounting for the relative ease of the third reduction of this class of molecules compared to the third reduction of free C₆₀.     

Electrochemical and Photochemical Conversion of [Ru3Ir(μ 3-H)(CO)13] into [Ru3Ir(μ-H)3(CO)12]

Electrochemical and photochemical properties of the tetrahedral cluster [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] were studied in order to prove whether the previously established thermal conversion of this cluster into the hydrogenated derivative [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] also occurs by means of redox or photochemical activation. Two-electron reduction of [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] results in the loss of CO and concomitant formation of the dianion [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₂]^2–. The latter reduction product is stable in CH₂Cl₂ at low temperatures but becomes partly protonated above 283K into the anion [Ru₃Ir(-H)₂(CO)₁₂]^– by traces of water. The dianion [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₂]^2– is also the product of the electrochemical reduction of [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] accompanied by the loss of H₂. Stepwise deprotonation of [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] with Et₄NOH yields [Ru₃Ir(-H)₂(CO)₁₂]^– and [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₂]^2–. Reverse protonation of the anionic clusters can be achieved, e.g., with trifluoromethylsulfonic acid. Thus, the electrochemical conversion of [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] into [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] is feasible, demanding separate two-electron reduction and protonation steps. Irradiation into the visible absorption band of [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] in hexane does not induce any significant photochemical conversion. Irradiation of this cluster in the presence of CO with _irr>340nm, however, triggers its efficient photofragmentation into reactive unsaturated ruthenium and iridium carbonyl fragments. These fragments are either stabilised by dissolved CO or undergo reclusterification to give homonuclear clusters. Most importantly, in H₂-saturated hexane, [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] converts selectively into the [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] photoproduct. This conversion is particularly efficient at _irr >340nm.     

Further studies of the reactions of PtRu5(μ6-C)(CO)16 with alkynes: The preparation and structural characterizations of PtRu5(CO)13(μ-EtC2Et)(μ3-EtC2Et)(μ5-C) and Pt2Ru6(CO)17(μ-η5-Et4C5)(μ3-EtC2Et) (μ6-C)

The reaction of PtRu₅(CO)₁₆(μ₆-C),1 with 3-hexyne in the presence of UV irradiation produced two new electron-rich platinum-ruthenium cluster complexes PtRu₅(CO)₁₃(μ-EtC₂Et)(μ₃-EtC₂Et)(μ₅-C),2 (20% yield) and Pt₂Ru₆(CO)₁₇(μ-η⁵-Et₄C₅)(μ₃-EtC₂Et) (μ₆-C),3 (7% yield). Both compounds were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. Compound2 contains of a platinum capped square pyramidal cluster of five ruthenium atoms with the carbido ligand located in the center of the square pyramid. A EtC₂Et ligand bridges one of the PtRu₂ triangles and the Ru-Pt bond between the apical ruthenium atom and the platinum cap. The structure of compound3 consists of an octahedral PtRu₅ cluster with an interstitial carbido ligand and a platinum atom capping one of the PtRu₂ triangles. There is an additional Ru(CO)₂ group extending from the platinum atom in the PtRu₅ cluster that contains a metallated tetraethylcyclopentadienyl ligand that bridges to the platinum capping group. There is also a EtC₂Et ligand bridging one of the PtRu₂ triangular faces to the capping platinum atom. Compounds2 and3 both contain two valence electrons more than the number predicted by conventional electron counting theories, and both also possess unusually long metal-metal bonds that may be related to these anomalous electron configurations. Crystal data for2, space group Pna2₁,a=19.951(3) Å,b=9.905(2) Å,c=17.180(2) Å,Z=2, 1844 reflections,R=0.036; for3, space group Pna2₁,α=13.339(1) Å,b=14.671(2) Å,c=11.748(2) Å, α=100.18(1)°, β=95.79(1)°, γ=83.671(9)°,Z=2, 3127 reflections,R=0.026.     

Diphenylphosphine and diphenylphosphido derivatives of [Ru3(μ-H)(μ3-ampy)(CO)9] (Hampy = 2-amino-6-methylpyridine)

The reactions of [Ru₃(μ-H)(μ-ampy)(CO)₉] (1) (Hampy = 2-amino-6-methylpyridine) with one or two equivalents of PPh₂H lead to the complexes [Ru₃(μ-H)(μ₃-ampy)(CO)₈(PPh₂H)] (2) or [Ru₃(μ-H)(μ₃-ampy)(CO)₇(PPh₂H)₂] (3), in which the PPh₂H ligands are cis to the bridging NH fragment and cis to the hydride. Complex 2 can be transformed in refluxing THF into the phosphido-bridged derivative [Ru₃(μ₃-ampy)(μ-PPh₂)(μ-CO)₂(CO)₆] (4), which contains the PPh₂ ligand spanning one of the two RuRu edges unbridged by the amido moiety, and presents an extremely high ³¹P chemical shift of 386.9 ppm. Under similar conditions, complex 3 gives a mixture of two isomers of [Ru₃(μ-H)(μ₃-ampy)(μ-PPh₂)₂(CO)₆] in a 5:1 ratio; the major product (5) has a plane of symmetry, whereas the minor one (6) is asymmetric.     

Reactions of Triruthenium Clusters with Quinolines: X-Ray Structures of [Ru3(μ-CO)(CO)7{μ3-η2-P(C6H5)CH2P(C6H5)2)}{μ-η2-C9H5(CH3)N}] and [Ru3(CO)10(μ-H){μ-η2-C9H6N}]

The reactions of [Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ-dppm)] 4 with quinolines afforded [Ru₃ (μ-CO)(CO)₇{μ₃-η²-P(C₆H₅)CH₂P(C₆H₅)₂)}{μ-η²-C₉H₅(R)N}] (8, R = 4-Me; 9, R = H) as the major products along with small amounts of known compound [Ru₃(CO)₉{μ₃-η³-P(C₆H₅)CH₂P(C₆H₅)(C₆H₄)}] 5. The molecular structure of 8 has been determined by single crystal X-ray studies. The reaction of 5 with 4-methylquinoline in refluxing cyclohexane afforded 8 and two known dinuclear compounds, [Ru₂(CO)₆{μ-CH₂P(C₆H₅)(C₆H₄)P(C₆H₅}] 10 and [Ru₂(CO)₆ {μ-(C₆H₄)P(C₆H₅)(CH₂)P(C₆H₅}] 11, in 40, 12, and 10% yields, respectively. The compounds 10 and 11 are also formed from the thermolysis of 4 in addition to the major compound 5. The solid state structure of the previously reported [Ru₃(CO)₁₀(η-H){μ-η²-C₉H₆N}] 2a is also reported for comparison.     

Microwave Promoted Oxidative Addition Reactions of Os3(CO)12: Efficient Syntheses of Triosmium Clusters of the Type Os3(μ-X)2(CO)10 and Os3(μ-H)(μ-OR)(CO)10

Microwave heating allows for the high-yield, one-step synthesis of the known triosmium complexes Os₃(μ-Br)₂(CO)₁₀ (1), Os₃(μ-I)₂(CO)₁₀ (2), and Os₃(μ-H)(μ-OR)(CO)₁₀ with R = methyl (3), ethyl (4), isopropyl (5), n-butyl (6), and phenyl (7). In addition, the new clusters Os₃(μ-H)(μ-OR)(CO)₁₀ with R = n-propyl (8), sec-butyl (9), isobutyl (10), and tert-butyl (11) are synthesized in a microwave reactor. The preparation of these complexes is easily accomplished without the need to first prepare an activated derivative of Os₃(CO)₁₂, and without the need to exclude air from the reaction vessel. The syntheses of complexes 1 and 2 are carried out in less than 15 min by heating stoichiometric mixtures of Os₃(CO)₁₂ and the appropriate halogen in cyclohexane. Clusters 3–6 and 8–10 are prepared by the microwave irradiation of Os₃(CO)₁₂ in neat alcohols, while clusters 7 and 11 are prepared from mixtures of Os₃(CO)₁₂, alcohol and 1,2-dichlorobenzene. Structural characterization of clusters 2, 4, and 5 was carried out by X-ray crystallographic analysis. High resolution X-ray crystal structures of two other oxidative addition products, Os₃(CO)₁₂I₂ (12) and Os₃(μ-H)(μ-O₂CC₆H₅)(CO)₁₀ (13), are also presented.     

Synthesis of 62-electron square planar clusters with group 15 and 16 main group atoms: Structural characterization of Ru4(CO)11(μ4-PPh)(μ4-S) and Ru4(CO)10(μ4-PPh)(μ4-Se)(PEt3): Bonding preferences in cappingNido Ru4(CO)13(μ3-PPh)

Thecloso octahedral cluster Ru₄(CO)₁₁(μ₄-PPh)(μ₄-S)1 and selenium and tellurium analogues, the first examples of unsaturated ruthenium clusters with a planar metal core and different main group 15 and 16 atoms have been synthesized fromnido Ru₄(CO)₁₃(μ₃-PPh). An X-ray analysis of1 and Ru₄(CO)₁₀(μ₄-PPh)(μ₄-Se)(PEt₃)2a has confirmed thetrans disposition of phosphorus and group 16 main group fragments.     

The Thermolysis of [Ru3(CO)12] in Cyclohexene: Synthesis and Charaterisation of the New Clusters [Ru3H2(CO)9(μ3-η1:η2:η1-C6H8)] and [Ru5(CO)12(μ4-η2-C6H8)(η4-C6H8)]

Thermolysis of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] in cyclohexene for 24 h affords the complexes [Ru(CO)₃(η⁴-C₆H₈)] (1), [Ru₃H₂(CO)₉(μ₂-η¹:η²:η¹-C₆H₈)] (2), [Ru₄(CO)₁₂(μ₄-C₆H₈)] (3) [Ru₄(CO)₉(μ₄-C₆H₈)(η⁶-C₆H₆)] (4a and 4b, two isomers) and [Ru₅(CO)₁₂(μ₄-η²-C₆H₈)(η⁴-C₆H₈)] (5), where 1, 3, 4a and 4b have been previously characterised as products of the thermolysis of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with cyclohexa-1,3-diene. The molecular structures of the new clusters 2 and 5 were determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, showing that two conformational polymorphs of 5 exist in the solid state, differing in the orientation of the cyclohexa-1,3-diene ligand on a ruthenium vertex.     

New triosmium–iridium clusters: Synthesis and molecular structure of [Os3Ir2(Cp1)2(μ-OH)(μ-CO)2(CO)8Cl] (1), [Os3IrCp1(μ-OH)(CO)10Cl] (2), [Os3IrCp1(μ-H)(μ-Cl)(η3,μ3-C5H2N(NH2)Br)(CO)9] (3) and [Os3IrCp1(μ-Cl)2(η2,μ3-C5H3N(NH)Br)(CO)7] (4)

The trinuclear osmium carbonyl cluster, [Os₃(CO)₁₀(MeCN)₂], is allowed to react with 1 equiv. of [IrCp¹Cl₂]₂ (Cp¹ = pentamethylcyclopentadiene) in refluxing dichloromethane to give two new osmium–iridium mixed-metal clusters, [Os₃Ir₂(Cp¹)₂(μ-OH)(μ-CO)₂(CO)₈Cl] (1) and [Os₃IrCp¹(μ-OH)(CO)₁₀Cl] (2), in moderate yields. In the presence of a pyridyl ligand, [C₅H₃N(NH₂)Br], however, the products isolated are different. Two osmium–iridium clusters with different coordination modes of the pyridyl ligand are afforded, [Os₃IrCp¹(μ-H)(μ-Cl)(η³,μ₃-C₅H₂N(NH₂)Br)(CO)₉] (3) and [Os₃IrCp¹(μ-Cl)₂ (η²,μ₃-C₅H₃N(NH)Br)(CO)₇] (4). All of the new compounds are characterized by conventional spectroscopic methods, and their structures are determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.     

[{(C5Me4R)Ru}3Ru(η3-As3)(μ3,η3-As3)(μ3-As)3], arsenreiche Vierkerncluster

The interaction of [(η⁵-C₅Me₄R)Ru(CO)₂]₂ (1a: R = Me, 1b: R = Et) with yellor arsenic, As₄, affords besides the pentaarsaruthenocenes [(η⁵-As₅)Ru(η⁵-C₅Me₄R)] (2a, 2b) the tetranuclear clusters [{(η⁵-C₅Me₄R)Ru}₃Ru(η³-As₃)(μ₃,η³-As₃)(μ₃-As)₃] (3a, 3b). The structure of 2b and 3b has been elucidated by X-ray analysis.     

Synthesis and characterisation of hexanuclear ruthenium clusters containing a μ4-nitrene ligand. Crystal structures of [Ru6(CO)15(μ-CO)2(μ4NH)(μ-OMe)μ3-η2-N(H)C(O)OMe] and [Ru6(CO)16(μ-CO)2(μ4-NH)(μ-OMe)(μ-NCO)]

Two hexaruthenium carbonyl clusters [Ru₆(CO)₁₅(μ-CO)₂(μ₄-NH) (μ-OMe){μ₃-η²-N(H)C(O)OMe}] and [Ru₆(CO)₁₆(μ-CO)₂-(μ₄-NH)(μ-OMe)(μ-NCO)]2 have been isolated from the pyrolysis of H₂Ru₃(CO))₉NOCH₃, and single-crystal X-ray structure analysis shows that both 1 and 2 have a square planar arrangement of four ruthenium atoms capped by a μ₄-nitrene ligand, with two additional ruthenium atoms bridging two opposite RuRu edges of the square base to form a ‘boat’ form metal framework.     

Further studies on the taumerization of the hydrido (alkynyl) cluster Ru3Pt(μ-H) {μ4-ν2-C ≡ C1Bu} (CO)9(L2) to the vinylidene cluster Ru3Pt{μ4-ν2-C ≡ C(H)tBu} (CO)9(L2): X-ray structures of Ru3Pt(μ-H){μ4-ν2-C = C(H)tBu} (CO)9(L2); L2 = dppet,dppp, andS,S-dppb

The first order rate constants for the tautomerization of the hydrio(alkynyl) clusters Ru₃Pt(μ-H){μ₄-ν²-C ≡ C¹Bu}(CO)₉(L₂);1a: L₂ = dppe,1b; L₂ = dppet,1c; L₂ = dppp and1d; L₂ =S,S-dppb to the corresponding vinylidene clusters Ru₃Pt{μ₄-ν²-C = C(H)^tBu}(CO)₉(L₂)2 have been measured, and they follow the orser1d <1a <1b ～1c. The reactions involving1a and1d exhibit an inverse kinetic deuterium isotope effect. The structures of1b, 2b, 2c, and2d were determined by X-ray crystallography, and are compared with those of1a and2a which have been previously reported. Crystal data for1b, space groupPbca,a = 13.338(4) Å,b = 17.771(6) Å,c = 36.092(8) Å,Z = 8,R(R _w) = 0.059(0.058) for 2342 absorption corrected, observed data; for2b, space group P2₁/n,a = 10.566(2) Å,b = 20.234(5) Å,c = 20.270(3) Å,β = 96.11(1)°,Z = 4,R(R _w) = 0.043(0.053) for 5865 absorption corrected, observed data; for2c, space group P2₁/n,a = 14.211(5) Å,b = 19.534(2) Å,c = 15.870(2) Å,β = 100.81(2)°,Z = 4,R(R _w) = 0.055(0.031) for 6566 absorption corrected, observed data: for2d, space group P2₁2₁2₁,a = 12.309(4) Å,b = 19.047(6) Å,c = 19.206(4) Å,Z = 4,R(R _w) = 0.055(0.053) fpr 2151 absorption corrected, observed data. The fluxional behavior of1d and1e (which consists of two interconverting isomers) has been examined by variable temperature¹³C NMR spectroscopy and by³¹P EXSY.