Guidance on the contents of accompanying documentation for reference materials (RMs)

The use of reference materials (RMs) is a key activity for the improvement and maintenance of a worldwide coherent measurement system. As detailed in ISO Guide 33, RMs with different characteristics are used in measurement processes, for the purpose of precision control, bias assessment, calibration, assigning values to other materials, and maintaining conventional scales, to name a few. For the establishment of metrological traceability of measurement results to international scales or other measurement standards, proper use of certified reference materials (CRMs) is essential. From the perspective of a reference material producer, the documentation that is provided with an RM is the value-adding component of the material; for the user, the document is critical for the correct implementation and use of the RM in the measurement process. The ISO Committee on Reference Materials (ISO/REMCO) recognised the importance of the documentation that accompanies a reference material as early as 1981 when the first edition of ISO Guide 31 was published. The third edition of the Guide that was published recently considers the appropriate accompanying documentation for all types of reference materials, i.e. CRMs and non-certified RMs.     

Outline for the revision of ISO Guide 35

The production of reference materials (RMs) is a key activity for the improvement and maintenance of a worldwide coherent measurement system. As detailed in ISO Guide 33, RMs with different characteristics are used in measurements, such as calibration, quality control and method validation, as well as for the assignment of values to other materials. Currently, ISO Guide 35 is in its third edition after it was revised in 2006. The Guide was developed to support best practices in the value assignment to specified properties of Certified Reference Materials (CRMs). This Guide gives general guidance and explains concepts to assist the understanding and development of valid methods to assign values to the properties of a reference material, including the evaluation of their associated measurement uncertainties, and the establishment of their metrological traceability. From the outcome of a systematic review of ISO Guide 35 among the members of ISO/REMCO, the ISO Committee on Reference Materials, it followed that there is a need for revising the current edition of ISO Guide 35. The mandate for the revision is focused on editorial updates to explain the concepts in more detail. It is not envisaged that major technical changes will be introduced. This paper explains the approach and rationale for the revision of ISO Guide 35 and invites comments from the users of the current edition of ISO Guide 35.     

REMCO, the ISO Council Committee on Reference Materials – its first 25 years

The 25th Anniversary of the first meeting of REMCO presents an occasion to summarize the events preceding and leading up to the establishment of this Committee, the ever growing use of reference materials, the ISO Guides REMCO has prepared, the help for Technical Committees to achieve valid measurements, the help for Developing Countries in upgrading their laboratories, its structure and contact points. Received: 26 February 2001 Accepted: 6 March 2001     

The new ISO Guide 80: Guidance for the in-house preparation of quality control materials (QCMs)

Reference materials (RMs) are widely used in measurement laboratories for a variety of purposes, and it is important to recognise that the material most appropriate for a particular application should be used. Certified reference materials (CRMs) are used for method validation, the calibration of a measurement system and all other aspects of the evaluation of the measurement system where the trueness of the measurement result is required. For other aspects, such as quality control, precision studies, the checking of the variability between operators, where the results are compared relatively, any suitable reference material can be used. ISO/REMCO, the ISO Committee on Reference Materials, has prepared ISO Guide 80, a guidance document for the in-house preparation of quality control materials (QCMs). QCMs are mostly used to monitor the performance of laboratory methods that have already been validated over time to be able to detect change or when a method goes out of statistical control. QCMs are RMs and as such have to be sufficiently homogeneous and stable for the intended use. QCMs are usually prepared in-house by laboratory staff for in-house use only, and therefore, the requirements for “in-house” QCMs are less demanding than those for a CRM. For example, transport issues are not of concern. The quality assessment of QCMs should involve homogeneity and stability assessments, and a limited characterisation of the material to provide an indication of its relevant property values and their variation, prior to use.     

New developments in the production and use of CRMs in Romania

 A lot of effort is being made in Romania to meet the present main strategic goal – EU integration. Since the confidence in measurements is of considerable importance in almost every field of activity, the National Institute of Metrology (INM) is involved in improving its calibration and measurement capabilities to provide services in accordance with the latest European Regulation. Within this framework the assurance of the required traceability of all measurements plays a most important role. As reliable analytical measurements depend largely upon reference materials and the assurance of the traceability of amount measurements is still developing in Romania, a new approach regarding the function of Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) may be emphasized. The experience of the INM as well as new developments in Romania in preparation and certification of Reference Materials (RMs) are described. A short review of the locally available RMs and CRMs is given. Some aspects regarding the use of RMs and CRMs, especially for calibration, are discussed for their applicability for analytical measurements. Received: 31 October 2002 Accepted: 24 January 2003 Presented at CERMM-3, Central European Reference Materials and Measurements Conference: The function of reference materials in the measurement process, May 30–June 1, 2002, Rogaška Slatina, Slovenia Correspondence to M. Buzoianu     

Accreditation of reference material producers: Let's get it right!

The accreditation of testing and calibration laboratories to ISO/IEC 17025 is increasingly calling for the accreditation of reference material (RM) producers. Two international guides, ISO Guide 34 (2000) " General requirements for the competence of reference material producers" issued by the ISO Committee on Reference Materials and ILAC-G 12 " Guidelines for the requirements for the competence of reference material producers" issued by the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), are already in use for this purpose. Recently however initiatives have been launched to accredit RM producers to ISO 17025 as calibration laboratories and it has been suggested that a combination of ISO/IEC 17025 " General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories" and ISO Guide 34 may be the best option. This publication is an expression of the position of the ISO Committee on Reference Materials (ISO/REMCO) on the standards and guides currently in use in the accreditation of RM producers. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these standards and guides from the perspective of benefit to RM producers and RM users. In conclusion, the use of ISO Guide 34 alone or in combination with ILAC-G 12 is the preferred system for the accreditation of RM producers. Therefore ISO/REMCO strongly encourages all accreditation bodies to adopt ISO Guide 34.     

ISO/REMCO近期活动

介绍ISO/REMCO 2007年已开展的和2008年将要开展的工作.重点介绍ISO/REMCO与标准物质相关的文件制定等一系列工作.     

Some aspects of the evaluation of measurement uncertainty using reference materials

 In practice there are three aspects that need to be considered in order to achieve the required traceability according to its definition: the 'stated reference', the 'unbroken chain of calibrations' and the "stated uncertainty". For a certain chemical result, each of these aspects highly depends on the measurement uncertainty, both on its magnitude and how it was estimated. Therefore, the paper describes the experience of the Romanian National Institute of Metrology in estimating measurement uncertainty during the certification of reference materials (RMs), in metrological activities (calibration, pattern approval, periodical verification, etc.), as well as during the analytical measurement process. Practical examples of estimation of measurement uncertainty using RMs or certified reference materials are discussed for their applicability in spectrophotometric and turbidimetric analysis. Use of the analysis of variance to obtain some additional information on the components of measurement uncertainty and to identify the magnitude of individual random effects is described. Received: 12 November 1999 / Accepted: 25 February 2000     

Ensuring the reliability of stable isotope ratio data—beyond the principle of identical treatment

The need for inter-laboratory comparability is crucial to facilitate the globalisation of scientific networks and the development of international databases to support scientific and criminal investigations. This article considers what lessons can be learned from a series of inter-laboratory comparison exercises organised by the Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (FIRMS) network in terms of reference materials (RMs), the management of data quality, and technical limitations. The results showed that within-laboratory precision (repeatability) was generally good but between-laboratory accuracy (reproducibility) called for improvements. This review considers how stable isotope laboratories can establish a system of quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA), emphasising issues of repeatability and reproducibility. For results to be comparable between laboratories, measurements must be traceable to the international δ-scales and, because isotope ratio measurements are reported relative to standards, a key aspect is the correct selection, calibration, and use of international and in-house RMs. The authors identify four principles which promote good laboratory practice. The principle of identical treatment by which samples and RMs are processed in an identical manner and which incorporates three further principles; the principle of identical correction (by which necessary corrections are identified and evenly applied), the principle of identical scaling (by which data are shifted and stretched to the international δ-scales), and the principle of error detection by which QC and QA results are monitored and acted upon. To achieve both good repeatability and good reproducibility it is essential to obtain RMs with internationally agreed δ-values. These RMs will act as the basis for QC and can be used to calibrate further in-house QC RMs tailored to the activities of specific laboratories. In-house QA standards must also be developed to ensure that QC-based calibrations and corrections lead to accurate results for samples. The δ-values assigned to RMs must be recorded and reported with all data. Reference materials must be used to determine what corrections are necessary for measured data. Each analytical sequence of samples must include both QC and QA materials which are subject to identical treatment during measurement and data processing. Results for these materials must be plotted, monitored, and acted upon. Periodically international RMs should be analysed as an in-house proficiency test to demonstrate results are accurate.     

Accreditation of reference material producers: the example of IRMM's Reference Materials Unit

The potential approaches for third-party assessment of reference material producers are revisited and the activities of the Reference Materials (RM) Unit of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) to obtain accreditation to ISO Guide 34 and ISO 17025 are described. Accreditation was related to the Unit as all matrix RM activities of the institute are concentrated there. A management system was established that allows sufficient flexibility to be applicable to a wide range of RMs while being precise enough to ensure compliance with ISO Guides 30, 31 and especially 34 and 35. Accreditation was achieved in 2004 with independent scopes for testing and RM production and was confirmed and extended in 2005. The key aspects of the RM Unit's management system for RM production are presented. Presented at BERM-10, April 2006, Charleston, SC, USA     

Development of reference materials for microbiological analysis

The reliability of reference materials (RMs) depends on properties such as fitness, robustness, commutability, stability and homogeneity. The development of RMs for microbiological analysis is especially challenged through questions around the stabilisation and recovery of viable cells, the dispersion of precise numbers of cells, matrix effects and, when using molecular techniques, the presence of nucleic acids (e.g. DNA) of dead and live target organisms. However, RMs are indispensable tools for quality control in microbiological analysis. The Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM), as part of the European Commission, concentrates its efforts on the development of RMs to support the development, implementation and monitoring of EU legislation. A special focus is given to highly precise RMs for presence/absence and enumeration tests in microbiological food and water analysis. Another group of new RMs certified by the IRMM comprise DNA-based materials to control the identity of micro-organisms in qualitative assays. All of these activities serve to improve quality control in microbiological analysis. Presented at ‘BERM-10’, April 2006, Charleston, SC, USA.     

The need for organic reference materials in marine science

Summary The reference materials (RMs) available for organic trace analysis (OTA) and the development programmes of the RM producers are reviewed. The need for a wider range of determinants, matrices and classes of RMs, particularly the more widespread use of laboratory RMs (LRMs) is discussed. Additional certified RMs should include phenolic surfactant degradation products, chlorophenolics from the wood and paper industries, and organobromines from fire retardants. RMs as molecular markers of geogenic, pyrogenic and biogenic sources; chlorophylls and xanthophylls as a measure of marine productivity and natural shellfish toxins are proposed.

---

Notwendigkeit organischer Referenzmaterialien in der Meeresforschung

     

The establishment of a quality evaluation system of reference materials

Reference materials have been applied widely to ensure the traceability, comparability and reliability of measurement results. To achieve this purpose, the quality of reference materials (RMs) themselves is surely an important aspect to be pay attention to. A quality evaluation system of RMs has been established through the project “The National Sharing Platform of Reference Materials” in China to give a reliable assessment on the quality of RMs from various sources including the accuracy and comparability of their property values, which is very useful to promote the appropriate selecting and using of RMs in China. Through the application of National Metrology Institute calibration and measurement capabilities on the basis of the international mutual recognition arrangement, it can also provide a powerful supplement to the current activities such as the accreditation of RM producers in the construction of a global harmonized quality control and assurance system of RMs.     

Reference materials in the world of tomorrow

Good projections about the use of reference materials (RMs) in the world of tomorrow are especially important to RM producers. They need to know what kinds of RMs will be required in the future, by whom, and for what purposes. They need to know what batch sizes to prepare of different kinds and how to allocate limited resources to best effect. The following steps may provide a useful view of the future of reference materials: (1) Review of trends, (2) Projection of challenges, (3) Analysis of driving forces and construction of scenarios, (4) Thinking “outside the box,” and (5) Selecting strategies. This paper will illustrate the use of these steps for the field of reference materials in order to provide a framework for the role of reference materials in the world of tomorrow. Received: 6 May 1997 / Revised: 22 July 1997 / Accepted: 24 July 1997     

Global activities in the world of reference materials including the needs of developing countries

Proceedings of previous BERM meetings have been used to assess emerging trends in the development of RMs to meet AQC requirements of clinical, food, nutrition, and environmental health areas. BRM-1 reflected a strong need to initiate and expand RM activities for certifying organic nutrients in foods. BRM-2 highlighted the distinction between primary (certified) and secondary (e.g. check samples for proficiency testing) RMs¹. BRM-3 identified the need for producing different levels of an analyte in a given matrix (spiked standards) to address matrix related measurement problems in foods. BERM-4 highlighted the need for a global vision in dealing with standards, illustrated by the activities of GESREM. Also, the logistics required for setting up intercomparison programs related to food safety monitoring programs were outlined. BERM-5 presented the changing outlook of the AOAC International in recognizing the usefulness of incorporating RMs for use in conjunction with their methods validation protocol. BERM-6 brought to the forefront the concern for traceability of chemical measurements to internationally recognized standards. BERM-7 recognized the need for multidisciplinary approaches for preparing certain types of CRMs, partly in response to the measurement needs arising from governmental regulations dealing with food safety and environmental health criteria. Finally, BERM symposia have promoted a meaningful dialogue on the RM needs of African, Asian and South American countries and provided the developing countries opportunities to discuss their problems with the international analytical community. The issue of health safety is involved in movement of foodstuffs between countries, and therefore, international efforts as voiced by the World Health Organization to provide guidance and assistance in AQC matters to the needy countries deserve consideration.     

REMCO — The ISO council committee on reference materials

Summary The purpose of this paper is to provide readers with an insight into the work of REMCO, the world's main body for considering matters related to the production and use of reference materials. The terms of reference for REMCO and its three task groups are given. Contents of the four ISO Guides issued by REMCO illustrate the range of topics covered in the work of the committee.     

Global perspectives for secondary reference materials for analysis of food and related biological samples

Primary, secondary and tertiary reference materials (RM) play an important role in quality controls of analytical measurements. Logistics of preparation and proper use of primary and secondary RMs are presented. Tertiary (i.e. in-house) control materials are useful as substitutes in the absence of recognized primary or secondary RMs. The lack of interdisciplinary interaction during development of RMs (e.g. in specific areas such as foods), has an important impact on limiting the usefulness of certain types of RMs. The abundance of RMs in some countries and regions appears to have little effect on the existing paucity in RMs in other regions, and the underlying causes are outlined. The ability of a laboratory to produce good quality in-house RMs traceable to recognized primary or secondary RMs is a direct measure of its quest for reliable analytical data. Therefore many laboratories should be encouraged to engage in secondary and tertiary RM activities designed to answer specific measurement problems. In this context, assistance (e.g. practical training opportunities) in identifying simple methods of analyses for their efficacy in determining specific analytes is a source of help that can be extended to countries experiencing limitations in laboratory instrumentation.     

Reference materials in the Russian system of accreditation of analytical laboratories

 This article is devoted to the role of reference materials (RMs) in chemical analysis and their main applications in analytical laboratories. The principal requirements of the RMs used in accredited laboratories in the Russian Analytical Laboratories Accreditation System (SAAL) are presented. These include the basic regulatory and metrological requirements of RMs. Finally, a review of the provision of RMs used for the analytical control of various test objects is presented. Received: 9 August 1998 / Accepted: 9 November 1998     

Using a process-centered approach to minimize the effort of compliance

 The complexity of different quality standards can, in principle, be covered by different approaches and strategies. In-depth process mapping of quality control (QC) work streams was used by the analytical laboratories of Lonza AG to show up the principle differences in being compliant to different quality systems. The results identified two main drivers for all necessary actions: process-related activities and infrastructure-related activities. In addition, a clear indication of the economic impact of these driving forces was gained, which led the laboratories to decide on a process-oriented approach. This approach has the advantage of being able to reflect the different demands of different quality assurance (QA) regulations within the same QC organizational structure. Following the process helps avoid unnecessary efforts in analytical work and represents a very economical approach, at the same time, providing high flexibility to react to different QA or customer demands. Received: 5 July 2002 Accepted: 12 November 2002 Acknowledgements The process-oriented approach resulted from many, very challenging discussions for which I would like to thank the staff of my organization (Analytics & QC), especially, the QA staff and the LIMS team. Presented at Analytica Conference, 23–26 April 2002, Munich, Germany Correspondence to B. Ciommer