A ‘One-Pot’ Anellation Method for the Transformation of Heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylates into Benzo[a]heptalenes

It has been found that dimethyl heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylates, when treated with 4 mol-equiv. of lithiated N,N-dialkylamino methyl sulfones or methyl phenyl sulfone, followed by 4 mol-equiv. of BuLi in THF in the temperature range of ?78 to 20°, give rise to the formation of 3-[(N,N-dialkylamino)sulfonyl]- or 3-(phenylsul-fonyl)benzo[a]heptalene-2,4-diols of. (cf. Scheme 4, and Tables 2 and 3). Accompanying products are 2,4-bis{[(N,N-dialkylamino)sulfonyl]methyl}- or 2,4-bis[(phenylsulfonyl)methyl]-4,10a-dihydro-3H-heptaleno[1,10-bc]furan-3-carboxylates as mixtures of diastereoisomers of. cf. Scheme 4, and (Tables 2 and 3) which are the result of a Michael addition reaction of the lithiated methyl sulfones at C(3) of the heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylates, followed by (sulfonyl)methylation of the methoxycarbonyl group at C(5) and cyclization of. (cf. Scheme 5). It is assumed that the benzo[a]heptalene formation is due to (sulfonyl)methylation of both methoxycarbonyl groups of the heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylates of. (cf. Schemes 6 and 8). The resulting bis-enolates 35 are deprotonated further. The thus formed tris-anions 36 can then cyclize to corresponding tris-anions 37 of cyclopenta[d]heptalenes which, after loss of N,N-dialkylamido sulfite or phenyl sulfinate, undergo a ring-enlargement reaction by 1,2-C migration finally leading to the observed benzo[a]heptalenes of. (cf. Schemes 8 and 9). The structures of the new product types have been finally established by X-ray crystal-structure analyses (cf. Figs. 1 and 2 as well as Exper. Part).     

Thermal Reaction of Azulenes with Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

1,3,4,6,8-Pentamethylazulene ( 9 ), when heated at 100° in supercritical CO₂ at 150 bar in the presence of 4 equiv. of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM), led to the formation of 16% of a 1:1 mixture of dimethyl 3,5,6,8,10-pentamethylheptalene-1,2-dicarboxylate 12a ) and its double-bond-shifted isomer 12b as well as 4% of the corresponding azulene-1,2-dicarboxylate 13 (Scheme 4). The formation of the [1 + 2] adduct 11 (cf. Scheme 2) was not observed. Similarly, benz[a]azulene ( 25 ) yielded in supercritical CO₂ (150°/170 bar) in the presence of 4 equiv. of ADM dimethyl benzo[d]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate ( 29 ; 30%) and dimethyl benzo[a]cyclopent[cd]azulene-1,2-dicarboxylate ( 28 ; 22%; Scheme 5). The reaction of 5,9-diphenylbenz[a]azulene ( 26 ) and ADM in supercritical CO₂ (100°/150 bar) gave the corresponding benzo[d]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate 31 (22%) and dimethyl 5,9-diphenyl-4b,10-etheno-10H-benz[a]azulene-11,12-dicarboxylate( 30 ; 25%; Scheme 5).     

Studies for a Variable Synthesis of Colchicinoids: Construction of Ring A on a Heptalene Moiety

It is shown that heptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylates 2 , which react with lithiated methyl sulfones mainly in a Michael fashion at C(3) (cf. Scheme 2), so that the formation of 3‐sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols 5 is repressed or completely suppressed, can be transformed into corresponding pseudo‐esters 15 (Scheme 4). These pseudo‐esters, on treatment with lithiated methyl sulfones, followed by addition of BuLi, furnish the 3‐sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols 5 in excellent‐to‐moderate yields without formation of Michael adducts or their follow‐up products (cf. Scheme 5 and 6). The reaction of the pseudo‐ester 15a with Li[¹³C]H₂SO₂Ph, followed by treatment with non‐labeled LiCH₂SO₂Ph and then BuLi, led to the exclusive formation of 3‐(phenylsulfonyl)‐[1‐¹³C]benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diol 5a* (Scheme 9). This experiment demonstrates that the (phenylsulfonyl)acetyl groups at C(4) and C(5) of the heptalene core retain their individual positions in the course of the benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diol formation. These findings are only compatible with an intramolecular rearrangement mechanism as depicted in Scheme 10.     

Formation of Heptaleno[1,2-c]furans and Heptaleno[1,2-c]furanones

The dehydrogenation reaction of the heptalene-4,5-dimethanols 4a and 4d , which do not undergo the double-bond-shift (DBS) process at ambient temperature, with basic MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature, leads to the formation of the corresponding heptaleno[1,2-c]furans 6a and 6d , respectively, as well as to the corresponding heptaleno[1,2-c]furan-3-ones 7a and 7d , respectively (cf. Scheme 2 and 8). The formation of both product types necessarily involves a DBS process (cf. Scheme 7). The dehydrogenation reaction of the DBS isomer of 4a , i.e., 5a , with MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature results, in addition to 6a and 7a , in the formation of the heptaleno[1,2-c]-furan-1-one 8a and, in small amounts, of the heptalene-4,5-dicarbaldehyde 9a (cf. Scheme 3). The benzo[a]heptalene-6,7-dimethanol 4c with a fixed position of the C?C bonds of the heptalene skeleton, on dehydrogenation with MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂, gives only the corresponding furanone 11b (Scheme 4). By [²H₂]-labelling of the methanol function at C(7), it could be shown that the furanone formation takes place at the stage of the corresponding lactol [3-²H₂]- 15b (cf. Scheme 6). Heptalene-1,2-dimethanols 4c and 4e , which are, at room temperature, in thermal equilibrium with their corresponding DBS forms 5c and 5e , respectively, are dehydrogenated by MnO₂ in CH₂Cl₂ to give the corresponding heptaleno[1,2-c]furans 6c and 6e as well as the heptaleno[1,2-c]furan-3-ones 7c and 7e and, again, in small amounts, the heptaleno[1,2-c]furan-1-ones 8c and 8e , respectively (cf. Scheme 8). Therefore, it seems that the heptalene-1,2-dimethanols are responsible for the formation of the furan-1-ones (cf. Scheme 7). The methylenation of the furan-3-ones 7a and 7e with Tebbe's reagent leads to the formation of the 3-methyl-substituted heptaleno[1,2-c]furans 23a and 23e , respectively (cf. Scheme 9). The heptaleno[1,2-c]furans 6a, 6d , and 23a can be resolved into their antipodes on a Chiralcel OD column. The (P)-configuration is assigned to the heptaleno[1,2-c]furans showing a negative Cotton effect at ca. 320 nm in the CD spectrum in hexane (cf. Figs. 3–5 as well as Table 7). The (P)-configuration of (–)- 6a is correlated with the established (P)-configuration of the dimethanol (–)- 5a via dehydrogenation with MnO₂. The degree of twisting of the heptalene skeleton of 6 and 23 is determined by the Me-substitution pattern (cf. Table 9). The larger the heptalene gauche torsion angles are, the more hypsochromically shifted is the heptalene absorption band above 300 nm (cf. Table 7 and 8, as well as Figs. 6–9).     

Alkylation Reactions at the Benzo Moiety of 2,4‐Dimethoxy‐3‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalenes – Model Compounds of Colchicinoids

Alkylation reactions of 3‐(X‐sulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols (X=Ph, morpholin‐4‐yl) and their dimethyl ethers were studied. The diols form with K₂CO₃/MeI in aqueous media the 1‐methylated benzoheptalenes, but in yields not surpassing 20% (Table 1). On the other hand, 2,4‐dimethoxybenzo[a]heptalenes can easily be lithiated at C(3) with BuLi and then treated with alkyl iodides to give the 3‐alkylated forms in good yield (Table 2). Surprising is the reaction with two equiv. or more of t‐BuLi since the alkylation at C(4) is accompanied by the reductive elimination of the X‐sulfonyl group at C(3) (Table 3). Most exciting is also the course of 2,4‐dimethoxy‐3‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalenes in the presence of an excess of MeLi. After the expected exchange of MeO against Me at C(4) (Scheme 6), rearrangement takes place under formation of 4‐benzyl‐2‐methoxybenzo[a]heptalenes and concomitant loss of the sulfonyl group at C(3) (Table 4). In the case of X=morpholin‐4‐yl, rearrangement cannot occur. However, the intermediate benzyl anions of Type E (Scheme 8) react easily with O₂ of the air to build up corresponding benzo[a]heptalene‐4‐methanols (Table 6).     

Benzo[a]heptalenes from Heptaleno[1,2‐c]furans. Part 2

It is shown in this ‘Part 2’ that heptaleno[1,2‐c]furans 1 react thermally in a Diels–Alder‐type [4+2] cycloaddition at the furan ring with vinylene carbonate (VC), phenylsulfonylallene (PSA), α‐(acetyloxy)acrylonitrile (AAN), and (1Z)‐1,2‐bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethene (ZSE) to yield the corresponding 1,4‐epoxybenzo[d]heptalenes (cf. Schemes 1, 5, 6, and 8). The thermal reaction of 1a and 1b with VC at 130° and 150°, respectively, leads mainly to the 2,3‐endo‐cyclocarbonates 2,3‐endo‐ 2a and ‐ 2b and in minor amounts to the 2,3‐exo‐cyclocarbonates 2,3‐exo‐ 2a and ‐ 2b . In some cases, the (P*)‐ and (M*)‐configured epimers were isolated and characterized (Scheme 1). Base‐catalyzed cleavage of 2,3‐endo‐ 2 gave the corresponding 2,3‐diols 3 , which were further transformed via reductive cleavage of their dimesylates 4 into the benzo[a]heptalenes 5a and 5b , respectively (Scheme 2). In another reaction sequence, the 2,3‐diols 3 were converted into their cyclic carbonothioates 6 , which on treatment with (EtO)₃P gave the deoxygenated 1,4‐dihydro‐1,4‐epoxybenzo[d]heptalenes 7 . These were rearranged by acid catalysis into the benzo[a]heptalen‐4‐ols 8a and 8b , respectively (Scheme 2). Cyclocarbonate 2,3‐endo‐ 2b reacted with lithium diisopropylamide (LDA) at ?70° under regioselective ring opening to the 3‐hydroxy‐substituted benzo[d]heptalen‐2‐yl carbamate 2,3‐endo‐ 9b (Scheme 3). The latter was O‐methylated to 2,3‐endo‐(P*)‐ 10b . The further way, to get finally the benzo[a]heptalene 13b with MeO groups in 1,2,3‐position, could not be realized due to the fact that we found no way to cleave the carbamate group of 2,3‐endo‐(P*)‐ 10b without touching its 1,4‐epoxy bridge (Scheme 3). The reaction of 1a with PSA in toluene at 120° was successful, in a way that we found regioisomeric as well as epimeric cycloadducts (Scheme 5). Unfortunately, the attempts to rearrange the products under strong‐base catalysis as it had been shown successfully with other furan–PSA adducts were unsuccessful (Scheme 4). The thermal cycloaddition reaction of 1a and 1b with AAN yielded again regioisomeric and epimeric adducts, which could easily be transformed into the corresponding 2‐ and 3‐oxo products (Scheme 6). Only the latter ones could be rearranged with Ac₂O/H₂SO₄ into the corresponding benzo[a]heptalene‐3,4‐diol diacetates 20a and 20b , respectively, or with trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (TfOSiMe₃/Et₃N), followed by treatment with NH₄Cl/H₂O, into the corresponding benzo[a]heptalen‐3,4‐diols 21a and 21b (Scheme 7). The thermal cycloaddition reaction of 1 with ZSE in toluene gave the cycloadducts 2,3‐exo‐ 22a and ‐ 22b as well as 2‐exo,3‐endo‐ 22c in high yields (Scheme 8). All three adducts eliminated, by treatment with base, benzenesulfinic acid and yielded the corresponding 3‐(phenylsulfonyl)‐1,4‐epoxybenzo[d]heptalenes 25 . The latter turned out to be excellent Michael acceptors for H₂O₂ in basic media (Scheme 9). The Michael adducts lost H₂O on treatment with Ac₂O in pyridine and gave the 3‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[d]heptalen‐2‐ones 28a and 3‐exo‐ 28b , respectively. Rearrangement of these compounds in the presence of Ac₂O/AcONa lead to the formation of the corresponding 3‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalene‐1,2‐diol diacetates 30a and 30b , which on treatment with MeONa/MeI gave the corresponding MeO‐substituted compounds 31a and 31b . The reductive elimination of the PhSO₂ group led finally to the 1,2‐dimethoxybenzo[a]heptalenes 32a and 32b . Deprotonation experiments of 32a with t‐BuLi/N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethane‐1,2‐diamine (tmeda) and quenching with D₂O showed that the most acid C? H bond is H? C(3) (Scheme 9). Some of the new structures were established by X‐ray crystal‐diffraction analyses (cf. Figs. 1, 3, 4, and 5). Moreover, nine of the new benzo[a]heptalenes were resolved on an anal. Chiralcel OD‐H column, and their CD spectra were measured (cf. Figs. 8 and 9). As a result, the 1,2‐dimethoxybenzo[a]heptalenes 32a and 32b showed unexpectedly new Cotton‐effect bands just below 300 nm, which were assigned to chiral exciton coupling between the heptalene and benzo part of the structurally highly twisted compounds. The PhSO₂‐substituted benzo[a]heptalenes 30b and 31b showed, in addition, a further pair of Cotton‐effect bands in the range of 275–245 nm, due to chiral exciton coupling of the benzo[a]heptalene chromophore and the phenylsulfonyl chromophore (cf. Fig. 10).     

A Detailed Investigation of the Reaction of 5,9-Diphenylbenz[a]azulene with Dialkyl Acetylenedicarboxylates Leading to Dialkyl 8,12-Diphenylbenzo[a]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylates

The synthesis of 5,9-diphenylbenz[a]azulene ( 1 ) from 1,3-diphenylcyclopent[a]indene-2,8-dione ( 4 ) and cyclopropene has been re-investigated. The reduction of the decarbonylated cycloadduct 5 with LiAlH₄/AlCl₃ in Et₂O leads not only to the expected 7,10-dihydrobenz[a]azulene 6 , but also to small amounts of the cyclopropa[b]fluorenes exo- 7 and endo- 7 (cf. Scheme 2), the structures of which have been determined by X-ray crystal-structure analysis (cf. Fig. 1). The reaction of 1 with dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylates (ADR) in MeCN at 100° in the presence of 2 mol-% of catalysts such as [RuH₂(PPh₃)₄] results mainly in the formation of the expected 8,12-diphenylbenzo[a]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylates 3 . A thorough investigation of the reaction mixture of 1 and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM) revealed the presence of a number of intermediates and side products (Scheme 5). Most important was the isolation and identification of the cyclobutene intermediate 9a (cf. Fig. 4), which is formed by a zwitterionic rearrangement of the primary adduct 2a of 1 and ADM and represents the direct precursor of the heptalene-diester 3a . Compounds of type 9a have so far only been postulated as necessary intermediates in the thermal reaction of azulenes and ADR to give corresponding heptalenedicarboxylates. Compound 9a is photochemically unstable and undergoes rearrangement even under the influence of normal laboratory light into a mixture of trans- 10a and cis- 10a (Scheme 8). Both diastereoisomers are also found in the original reaction mixture of 1 and ADM, but not when the reaction is performed under exclusion of light. On heating in MeCN at 100°, or better in DMF at 150°, trans- 10a and cis- 10a undergo rearrangement to the fluoranthene-1,2-dicarboxylate 11a (Scheme 9), which is also present in the original reaction mixture of 1 and ADM. The catalysts do not accelerate the reaction of 1 and ADR, but they lead to better yields of the benzo[a]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylates 3 , especially in the reaction of 1 with diisopropyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADiP) (cf. Tables 1 and 2).     

Synthesis and Chiroptical Properties of Dimethyl 8,12-Diphenylbenzo[d]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate

6,10-Diphenylbenz[a]azulene ( 3 ) was reacted with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM) in the presence of 2 mol-% of [RuH₂(PPh₃)₄] in MeCN at 100° to yield a 7:1 mixture of dimethyl 2,6-diphenyl-9,10-benzotricyclo[6.2.2.0^1,7]dodeca-2,4,6,9,11-pentaene-11,12-dicarboxylate ( 4 ) and dimethyl 8,12-diphenylbenzo[d]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate ( 5 ; Scheme 2). The tricycle 4 , when heated in DMF at 150° for 1 h led to the formation of 81.5% of the heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate 5 and 15% of the starting azulene 3 . No rearrangement of tricycle 4 was observed, when it was heated at temperatures up to 180° in pseudocumene. The heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate 5 was easily separated into its antipodes (PM)-and (MP)- 5 on a Chiracel column (cf. Fig. 2). On heating at 150° for 1 h, (MP)- 5 showed no racemization at all. The Ru-catalyzed reaction of benz[a]azulene ( 6 ) with ADM led to the formation of dimethyl 9,10-benzotricyclo[6.2.2.0^1,7]dodeca-2,4,6,9,11-pentaene-11,12-dicarboxylate ( 7 ; Scheme 3). However, the formation of the corresponding heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate could not be observed.     

An Efficient Straightforward Synthesis of Benz[a]azulene

Benz[a]azulene ( 1 ) is synthesized in five steps (cf. Scheme 2) starting from commercially available 2-iodobenzyl alcohol ( 4 ) and tropylium tetrafluoroborate in an overall yield of 44%. The key step (cf. also Scheme 1) is the intramolecular Heck reaction of the 8-phenylsulfonyl-substituted heptafulvene 7 , which leads in nearly quantitative yield directly to 10-(phenylsulfonyl)benz[a]azulene ( 8 ). The desulfonylation of 8 can be accomplished by Julia's method with Na₂S₂O₄/NaHCO₃ in DMF/H₂O at 85–90°, thus leading to pure 1 in 78% yield. The phenylation of 8 with PhLi or PhCul at ?78° in THF occurs regioselectively at C(9). Dehydrogenation of the formed dihydroazulenes with o-chloroanil in toluene at room temperature gives 9-phenyl-10-(phenylsulfonyl)-benz[a]azulene ( 9 ) in 70% yield (cf. Scheme 3), which, again, can be desulfonylated with Na₂S₂O₄/NaHCO₃ in DMF/H₂O in good yields. The addition of PhLi to 1 in THF occurs at temperatures ? ?25°. Ionic dehydrogenation (1. Ph₃C⁺BF/MeCN; 2. Et₃N) of the dihydro forms leads to 3 , as the main product, and its positional isomers.     

Synthesis of Benzo[a]heptalene

Benzo[a]heptalene has been synthesized by two different approaches. The first one follows a pathway to hexahydrobenzo[a]heptalenone 19a that has been already described by Wenkert and Kim(Scheme). Indeed, 19a was obtained in a mixture with its double-bond-shifted isomer 19b . Reduction of this mixture to the corresponding secondary alcohols 26a/26b and elimination of H₂O lead to a mixture of the tetrahydrobenzo[a]heptalenes 23a-d (Scheme7 and 8). Reaction of 23a-d with 2 equiv. of triphenylmethylium tetrafluoroborate in boiling CHCl₃, followed by treatment with Me₃N in CH₂Cl₂, generated directly 2 , unfortunately in a mixture with Ph₃CH that could not be separated from 2 (Scheme 10 and 11). The second approach via dimethyl benzo[a]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate ( 30 ) (Scheme 12) that was gradually transformed into the corresponding carbaldehydes 37 and 43 (Scheme 14) both of which, on treatment with the Wilkinson catalyst [RhCl(PPh₃)₃] at 130° in toluene, smoothly decarbonylated, finally gave pure 2 as an unstable orange, viscous oil. UV/VIS, NMR, and mass spectra of 2 are discussed in detail (cf. Chapt.3).     

Thermal Reaction of Azulene and Some of Its Symmetrically Substituted Methyl Derivatives with Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate

It is shown that azulene ( 1 ) and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM) in a fourfold molar excess react at 200° in decalin to yield, beside the known heptalene- ( 5 ) and azulene-1,2-dicarboxylates ( 6 ), in an amount of 1.6% tetramethyl (1RS,2RS,5SR,8RS)-tetracyclo[6.2.2.2^2,50^1,5]tetradeca-3,6,9,11,13-pentaene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylate(‘anti’-7) as a result of a SHOMO (azulene)/LUMO(ADM)-controlled addition of ADM to the seven-membered ring of 1 followed by a Diels-Alder reaction of the so formed tricyclic intermediate 16 (cf. Scheme 3) with a second molecule of ADM. The structure of ‘anti’-7 was confirmed by an X-ray diffraction analysis. Similarly, the thermal reaction of 5,7-dimehtylazulene ( 3 ) with excess ADM in decalin at 120° led to the formation of ca. 1% of ‘anti’- 12 , the 7,12-dimethyl derivative of‘anti’-7, beside of the corresponding heptalene- 10 and azulene-1,2-dicaboxylated (cf Scheme 2). The introduction of Me groups at C(1)and C(3)of azulene ( 1 ) and its 5,7-dimethyl derivative 3 strongly enhance the thermal formation of the corresponding tetracyclic compound. Thus, 1,3-dimethylazulene ( 2 ) in the presence of a sevenfold molar excess of ADM at 200° yielded 20% of ‘anti’- 9 beside an equal amount of dimethyl 3-mehtylazulene-1,2-dicarboxylate ( 8 ;cf. Scheme 1), and 1,3,5,7-tetramethylazulene ( 4 ) with a fourfold molar excess of ADM AT 200° gave a yield of 37% of‘anti’- 15 beside small amount of the corresponding heptalene- 13 and azulene-1,2-dicarboxylates 14 (cf.Scheme 2).     

On the Formation of 2‐Sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐1,3‐diols as Precursors for the Synthesis of Colchicinoids

The benzo[a]heptalene formation from 4‐[(R‐sulfonyl)acetyl]heptalene‐5‐carboxylates 15 and 5‐[(R‐sulfonyl)acetyl]heptalene‐4‐carboxylates 16 (R=Ph or morpholino) in the presence of R′SO₂CH₂Li and BuLi has been investigated (Scheme 6). Only the sulfonyl moiety linked to the C?O group at C(4) of the heptalene skeleton is found at C(3) of the formed benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols 3 in accordance with the general mechanism of their formation (Scheme 3). Intermediates that might rearrange to corresponding 2‐sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐1,3‐diols lose HO^? under the reaction conditions to yield the corresponding cyclopenta[d]heptalenones of type 11 (Schemes 6 and 7). However, the presence of an additional Me group at C(α) of the lithioalkyl sulfones suppresses the loss of HO^?, and 4‐methyl‐2‐sulfonylbenzo[a]heptalene‐1,3‐diols of type 4c have been isolated and characterized for the first time (Schemes 8 and 10). A number of X‐ray crystal‐structure analyses of starting materials and of the new benzo[a]heptalenes have been performed. Finally, benzo[a]heptalene 4c has been transformed into its 1,2,3‐trimethoxy derivative 23 , a benzo[a]heptalene with the colchicinoid substitution pattern at ring A (Scheme 11).     

Thermal Reactions of Guaiazulene and Its 3-Methyl Derivative with Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate

The thermal reaction of 7-isopropyl-1,3,4-trimethylazulene (3-methylguaiazulene; 2 ) with excess dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM) in decalin at 200° leads to the formation of the corresponding heptalene- ( 5a/5b and 6a/6b ; cf. Scheme 3) and azulene-1,2-dicarboxylates ( 7 and 8 , respectively). Together with small amounts of a corresponding tetracyclic compound (‘anti’- 13 ) these compounds are obtained via rearrangement (→ 5a/5b and 6a/6b ), retro-Diels-Alder reaction (→ 7 and 8 ), and Diels-Alder reaction with ADM (→ ‘anti’- 13 ) from the two primary tricyclic intermediates ( 14 and 15 ; cf. Scheme 5) which are formed by site-selective addition of ADM to the five-membered ring of 2 . In a competing Diels-Alder reaction, ADM is also added to the seven-membered ring of 2 , leading to the formation of the tricyclic compounds 9 and 10 and of the Diels-Alder adducts ‘anti’- 11 and ‘anti’- 12 , respectively of 9 and of a third tricyclic intermediate 16 which is at 200° in thermal equilibrium with 9 and 10 (cf. Scheme 6). The heptalenedicarboxylates 5a and 5b as well as 6a and 6b are interconverting slowly already at ambient temperature (Scheme 4). The thermal reaction of guaiazulene ( 1 ) with excess ADM in decalin at 190° leads alongside with the known heptalene- ( 3a ) and azulene-1,2-dicarboxylates ( 4 ; cf. Schemes 2 and 7) to the formation of six tetracyclic compounds ‘anti’- 17 to ‘anti’- 21 as well as ‘syn’- 19 and small amounts of a 4:1 mixture of the tricyclic tetracarboxylates 22 and 23 . The structure of the tetracyclic compounds can be traced back by a retro-Diels-Alder reaction to the corresponding structures of tricyclic compounds ( 24--29 ; cf. Scheme 8) which are thermally interconverting by [1,5]-C shifts at 190°. The tricyclic tetracarboxylates 22 and 23 , which are slowly equilibrating already at ambient temperature, are formed by thermal addition of ADM to the seven-membered ring of dimethyl 5-isopropyl-3,8-dimethylazulene-1,2-dicarboxylate ( 7 ; cf. Scheme 10). Azulene 7 which is electronically deactivated by the two MeOCO groups at C(1) and C(2) shows no more thermal reactivity in the presence of ADM at the five-membered ring (cf. Scheme 11). The tricyclic tetracarboxylates 22 and 23 react with excess ADM at 200° in a slow Diels-Alder reaction to form the tetracyclic hexacarboxylates 32 , ‘anti’- 33 , and ‘anti’- 34 (cf. Schemes 10–12 as well as Scheme 13). A structural correlation of the tri- and tetracyclic compounds is only feasible if thermal equilibration via [1,5]-C shifts between all six possible tricyclic tetracarboxylates ( 22, 23 , and 35–38 ; cf. Scheme 13) is assumed. The tetracyclic hexacarboxylates 32 , ‘anti’- 33 , and ‘anti’- 34 seem to arise from the most strained tricyclic intermediates ( 36–38 ) by the Diels-Alder reaction with ADM.     

Formation of 2‐(Phenylsulfonyl)resorcinols (=2‐(Phenylsulfonyl)benzene‐1,3‐diols) from Symmetrically Substituted Maleic Anhydrides (=Furan‐2,5‐diones)

Treatment of symmetrically substituted maleic anhydrides (=furan‐2,5‐diones) 6 with lithium (phenylsulfonyl)methanide, followed by methylation of the adduct with MeI/K₂CO₃ in acetone, give the corresponding 4,5‐disubstituted 2‐methyl‐2‐(phenylsulfonyl)cyclopent‐4‐ene‐1,3‐diones 8 (Scheme 3). Reaction of the latter with lithium (phenylsulfonyl)methanide in THF (?78°) and then with 4 mol‐equiv. BuLi (?5° to r.t.) leads to 5,6‐disubstituted 4‐methyl‐2‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzene‐1,3‐diols 9 (Scheme 4).     

Formation of Cyclic ‘ortho’-Anhydrides of Heptalene-1,2-dicarboxylic Acids

1-(Alkoixycarbonyl)heptalene-2-carboxylic acids as well as 2-(alkoxycarbonyl)heptalene-1-carboxylic acids react with the iminium salt formed from N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and oxalyl chloride, in the presence of an alcohol, to yield the corresponding cyclic ‘ortho’ -anhydrides (ψ-esters; cf. Schemes 2,3,6, and 8). When the alkoxy moiety of the acids and the alcohols is different, then diastereoisomeric ‘ortho’ -anhydrides are formed due to the non-planarity of the heptalene skeleton. The approach of the alcohol from the β-side is strongly favored (cf. Scheme 5 and Table 1). This effect can be attributed to the bent topology of the heptalene skeleton which sterically hinders the approach of the nucleophile from the α-side of the postulated intermediates, i.e. the charged O-alkylated anhydrides of type 19 (cf. Scheme 6). Whereas the ‘ortho’-anhydrides with four substituents in the ‘peri’ -positions of the heptalene skeleton are configurationally stable up to 100°, the ‘ortho’ -anhydrides with only three ‘peri’ -substituents slowly epimerize at 100° (cf. Scheme 7) due to the thermally induced inversion of the configuration of the heptalene skeleton.     

Synthesis of Polyalkylphenyl Prop‐2‐ynoates and Their Flash Vacuum Pyrolysis to Polyalkylcyclohepta[b]furan‐2(2H)‐ones

A new method for the smooth and highly efficient preparation of polyalkylated aryl propiolates has been developed. It is based on the formation of the corresponding aryl carbonochloridates (cf. Scheme 1 and Table 1) that react with sodium (or lithium) propiolate in THF at 25 – 65°, with intermediate generation of the mixed anhydrides of the arylcarbonic acids and prop‐2‐ynoic acid, which then decompose almost quantitatively into CO₂ and the aryl propiolates (cf. Scheme 11). This procedure is superior to the transformation of propynoic acid into its difficult‐to‐handle acid chloride, which is then reacted with sodium (or lithium) arenolates. A number of the polyalkylated aryl propiolates were subjected to flash vacuum pyrolysis (FVP) at 600 – 650° and 10⁻² Torr which led to the formation of the corresponding cyclohepta[b]furan‐2(2H)‐ones in average yields of 25 – 45% (cf. Scheme 14). It has further been found in pilot experiments that the polyalkylated cyclohepta[b]furan‐2(2H)‐ones react with 1‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)cyclohexene in toluene at 120 – 130° to yield the corresponding 1,2,3,4‐tetrahydrobenz[a]azulenes, which become, with the growing number of Me groups at the seven‐membered ring, more and more sensitive to oxidative destruction by air (cf. Scheme 15).     

Reductive Elimination of Phenylsulfonyl Groups in the 3‐Position of Benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols

3‐(Phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols 1 can be desulfonylated with an excess of LiAlH₄/MeLi?LiBr in boiling THF in good yields (Scheme 6). When the reaction is run with LiAlH₄/MeLi, mainly the 3,3′‐disulfides 6 of the corresponding 2,4‐dihydroxybenzo[a]heptalene‐3‐thiols are formed after workup (Scheme 7). However, the best yields of desulfonylated products are obtained when the 2,4‐dimethoxy‐substituted benzo[a]heptalenes 2 are reduced with an excess of LiAlH₄/TiCl₄ at ?78→20° in THF (Scheme 10). Attempts to substitute the PhSO₂ group of 2 with freshly prepared MeONa in boiling THF led to a highly selective ether cleavage of the 4‐MeO group, rather than to desulfonylation (Scheme 13).     

Synthesis of an Isotopically Isomeric Mixture of 1,4,6,8-Tetramethyl[13C2]azulene and Its Thermal Reaction with Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate

Sodium [1,3-¹³C₂]cyclopentadienide in tetrahydrofuran (THF) has been prepared from the corresponding labelled [¹³C₂]cyclopentadiene which was synthesized from ¹³CO₂ and (chloromethyl)trimethylsilane (cf. Scheme 10) according to an established procedure. It could be shown that the acetate pyrolysis of cis-cyclopentane-1,2-diyl diacetate (cis- 22 ) at 550 ± 5° under reduced pressure (60 Torr) gives five times as much cyclopentadiene as trans- 22 . The reaction of sodium [1,3-¹³C₂]cyclopentadienide with 2,4,6-trimethylpyrylium tetrafluoroborate in THF leads to the formation of the statistically expected 2:2:1 mixture of 4,6,8-trimethyl[1,3a-¹³C₂], -[2,3a-¹³C₂]-, and -[1,3-¹³C₂]azulene ( 20 ; cf. Scheme 7 and Fig. 1). Formylation and reduction of the 2:2:1 mixture [¹³C₂]- 20 results in the formation of a 1:1:1:1:1 mixture of 1,4,6,8-tetramethyl[1,3-¹³C₂]-, -[1,3a-¹³C₂]-, -[2,3a-¹³C₂]-, -[2,8a-¹³C₂]-, and -[3,8a-¹³C₂]azulene ( 5 ; cf. Scheme 8 and Fig. 2). The measured ²J(¹³C, ¹³C) values of [¹³C₂]- 20 and [¹³C₂]- 5 are listed in Tables 1 and 2. Thermal reaction of the 1:1:1:1:1 mixture [¹³C₂]- 5 with the four-fold amount of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM) at 200° in tetralin (cf. Scheme 2) gave 5,6,8,10-tetramethyl-[¹³C₂]heptalene-1,2-dicarboxylate ([¹³C₂]- 6a ; 22%), its double-bond-shifted (DBS) isomer [¹³C₂]- 6b (19%), and the corresponding azulene-1,2-dicarboxylate 7 (18%). The isotopically isomeric mixture of [¹³C₂]- 6a showed no ¹J(¹³C,¹³C) at C(5) (cf. Fig. 3). This finding is in agreement with the fact that the expected primary tricyclic intermediate [7,11-¹³C₂]- 8 exhibits at 200° in tetralin only cleavage of the C(1)? C(10) bond and formation of a C(7)? C(10) bond (cf. Schemes 6 and 9), but no cleavage of the C(1)? C(11) bond and formation of a C(7)? C(11) bond. The limits of detection of the applied method is ≥96% for the observed process, i.e., [1,3a-¹³C₂]- 5 + ADM→ [7,11-¹³C₂]- 8 →[1,6-¹³C₂]- 9 →[5,10a-¹³C₂]- 6a (cf. Scheme 6).     

Formation of Unusual Products from the Acid-Catalyzed Reaction of Azulenes with Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate

The reaction of guaiazulene ( 4 ) and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM) in tetralin or toluene, catalyzed by 5 mol-% of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at ambient temperature, leads to the formation of the corresponding heptalene-4,5-dicarboxylate 6 and a guaiazulenyl-substituted 2,2a,4a,8b-tetrahydrocyclopent[cd]azulene derivative 7 beside the expected guaiazulenyl-substituted ethenedicarboxylates (E)- 5 and (Z)- 5 as main products (Scheme 2). The structure of 7 was unequivocally established by an X-ray crystal-structure analysis (Fig. 1). Precursor of 7 must be the 2a,4a-dihydrocyclopent[cd]azulene-3,4-dicarboxylate 9 which reacts, under TFA catalysis, with a second molecule of 4 (Scheme 3). No formation of products of type 7 has been observed in the TFA-catalyzed reaction of 4,6,8-trimethyl- and 1,4,6,8-tetramethylazulene ( 13 and 16 , respectively) and ADM (Scheme 4). On the other hand, the TFA-catalyzed reaction of azulene ( 18 ) itself and ADM at ambient temperature gives rise to a whole variety of new products (Scheme 5), the major part of which is derived from dimethyl 2a,4a-dihydrocyclopent[cd]azulene-3,4-dicarboxylate ( 25 ) as the main intermediate (Scheme 6). Nevertheless, for the formation of the 2a,4a,6,8b-tetrahydrocyclobut[a]azulene derivatives (E)- 24a and (E)- 24b , a corresponding 2a,8b-dihydro precursor 29 has to be postulated as crucial intermediate (Scheme 8).     

An Analysis of the Bonding Properties of Benz[a]azulene by X-Ray,NMR, and Computational Studies

The X-ray crystal structures of 9-phenylbenz[a]azulene ( 4 ) and the corresponding non-benzannelated form, 4-phenylazulene ( 5 ), have been determined (cf. Fig.2). In contrast to 5 , the skeleton of which shows nearly equal C,C bond lengths (cf. Table 1), the seven-membered ring of 4 exhibits clearly alternating C,C bond lengths (cf. Table 1). This is in agreement with a strong accentuation of the heptafulvene substructure in 4 by the [a] benzannelation. The alternating bond lengths of 4 and of its parent structure 3 are also reflected in the corresponding variations of the ³J(H,H) and ¹J(¹³C,¹³C) values of these benz[a]azulenes (cf. Tables 4 and 5). Computations on the MP2/6-31G^* level as well as on the BP86/6-31G^* level for azulene ( 6 ), benz[a]azulene ( 3 ), and heptafulvene ( 7 ) are in good agreement with the experimental values (cf. Tables 6–8).