A new proposed model of restricted data envelopment analysis by correlation coefficients

The concept of efficiency in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is defined as weighted sum of outputs/weighted sum of inputs. In order to calculate the maximum efficiency score, each decision making unit (DMU)’s inputs and outputs are assigned to different weights. Hence, the classical DEA allows the weight flexibility. Therefore, even if they are important, the inputs or outputs of some DMUs can be assigned zero (0) weights. Thus, these inputs or outputs are neglected in the evaluation. Also, some DMUs may be defined as efficient even if they are inefficient. This situation leads to unrealistic results. Also to eliminate the problem of weight flexibility, weight restrictions are made in DEA. In our study, we proposed a new model which has not been published in the literature. We describe it as the restricted data envelopment analysis ((ARIII(COR))) model with correlation coefficients. The aim for developing this new model, is to take into account the relations between variables using correlation coefficients. Also, these relations were added as constraints to the CCR and BCC models. For this purpose, the correlation coefficients were used in the restrictions of input–output each one alone and their combination together. Inputs and outputs are related to the degree of correlation between each other in the production. Previous studies did not take into account the relationship between inputs/outputs variables. So, only with expert opinions or an objective method, weight restrictions have been made. In our study, the weights for input and output variables were determined, according to the correlations between input and output variables. The proposed new method is different from other methods in the literature, because the efficiency scores were calculated at the level of correlations between the input and/or output variables.     

Evaluating the performances of decision-making units based on interval efficiencies

Efficiency could be not only the ratio of weighted sum of outputs to that of inputs but also that of weighted sum of inputs to that of outputs. When the previous efficiency measures the best relative efficiency within the range of no more than one, the decision-making units (DMUs) who get the optimum value of one perform best among all the DMUs. If the previous efficiency is measured within the range of no less than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform worst among all the DMUs. When the later efficiency is measured within the range of no more than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform worst among all the DMUs. If the later efficiency is measured within the range of no less than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform best among all the DMUs. This paper mainly studies an interval DEA model with later efficiency, in which efficiency is measured within the range of an interval, whose upper bound is set to one and the lower bound is determined by introducing a virtual ideal DMU, whose performance is definitely superior to any DMUs. The efficiencies, obtained from interval DEA model, turn out to be all intervals and are referred to as interval efficiencies, which combine the best and the worst relative efficiency in a reasonable manner to give an overall assessment of performances for all DMUs. Assessor's preference information on input and output weights is also incorporated into interval DEA model reasonably and conveniently. Through an example, some differences are found from the ranking results obtained from interval DEA model and bounded DEA model using the Hurwicz criterion approach to rank the interval efficiencies.     

Would weighted-student funding enhance intra-district equity in Texas? A simulation using DEA

We use data envelopment analysis to model the educational production function, and then explore how a shift to weighted student funding using the student weights embedded in the Texas School Finance Formula would alter the allocation of inputs and potential outputs. School outputs are measured as value-added reading and math scores on standard achievement tests. We find that if school districts allocated their resources efficiently, then they would not allocate their resources to campuses according to the funding model weights. Policies that promote greater efficiency would also enhance equity in educational outcomes.     

A new data envelopment analysis model with fuzzy random inputs and outputs

This paper first presents several formulas for mean chance distributions of triangular fuzzy random variables and their functions, then develops a new class of fuzzy random data envelopment analysis (FRDEA) models with mean chance constraints, in which the inputs and outputs are assumed to be characterized by fuzzy random variables with known possibility and probability distributions. According to the established formulas for the mean chance distributions, we can turn the mean chance constraints into their equivalent stochastic ones. On the other hand, since the objective in the FRDEA model is the expectation about the ratio of the weighted sum of outputs and the weighted sum of inputs for a target decision-making unite (DMU), for general fuzzy random inputs and outputs, we suggest an approximation method to evaluate the objective; and for triangular fuzzy random inputs and outputs, we propose a method to reduce the objective to its equivalent stochastic one. As a consequence, under the assumption that the inputs and the outputs are triangular fuzzy random vectors, the proposed FRDEA model can be reduced to its equivalent stochastic programming one, in which the constraints contain the standard normal distribution function, and the objective is the expectation for a function of the normal random variable. To solve the equivalent stochastic programming model, we design a hybrid algorithm by integrating stochastic simulation and genetic algorithm (GA). Finally, one numerical example is presented to demonstrate the proposed FRDEA modeling idea and the effectiveness of the designed hybrid algorithm.     

Maximally productive input–output units

Technical or Pareto–Koopmans efficiency models can be based on ratios of weighted sums of outputs to weighted sums of inputs. Differing meanings have been considered for such factor weights. In this paper, we use value or cost rate meanings depending on model orientation. These meanings permit considering the simultaneous assignment of input and output factor weights along with optimal intensity values for a virtual composite unit constructed from the observed units. An optimization principle we call the winners-take-all criterion is proposed for determining the maximally productive unit(s). No assumptions are required on the internal transformation processes of the units. The model simultaneously determines the intensities and factor weights and results in indefinite quadratic programming problems that simplify to linear programming in certain cases. For the general case, genetic search is applied. Numerical illustrations are provided for faculty merit scoring and for the 15 hospital dataset of Sherman.     

Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA

Kao and Hwang (2008) [Kao, C., Hwang, S.-N., 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research 185 (1), 418–429] develop a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach for measuring efficiency of decision processes which can be divided into two stages. The first stage uses inputs to generate outputs which become the inputs to the second stage. The first stage outputs are referred to as intermediate measures. The second stage then uses these intermediate measures to produce outputs. Kao and Huang represent the efficiency of the overall process as the product of the efficiencies of the two stages. A major limitation of this model is its applicability to only constant returns to scale (CRS) situations. The current paper develops an additive efficiency decomposition approach wherein the overall efficiency is expressed as a (weighted) sum of the efficiencies of the individual stages. This approach can be applied under both CRS and variable returns to scale (VRS) assumptions. The case of Taiwanese non-life insurance companies is revisited using this newly developed approach.     

Characteristics and structures of weak efficient surfaces of production possibility sets

This paper studies the characteristics and structure of the weak surface of the production possibility set. We apply techniques and methods of transferring a polyhedral cone from its intersection form to its sum form, identify an intersection representation of the production possibility set. We give the structure theorem of weak surface of the production possibility set, which includes three complementary slackness conditions. We define the input weak efficiency and output weak efficiency for different DEA models according to the representation of the intersection form. It investigates the characteristics of the weak surfaces, and proves the structure theorems of input weak DEA efficiency and output weak DEA efficiency. The structure theorems establish weighted combination of inputs and outputs that are weak DEA efficient. Numerical examples are provided for illustration.     

Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis

This paper explores the consequences of total weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis (DEA) assessments of the efficiency of decision-making units, and it suggests one possible way of limiting such flexibility. It is suggested that total weight flexibility can lead to some decision-making units being assessed, in effect, on only a small subset of their inputs and outputs, while the rest of their inputs and outputs are all but ignored. Constraining the weights in DEA assessments overcomes this problem. The paper suggests one way in which constraints can be placed for the case where the decision-making units to be assessed use only a single input. The method is illustrated using data on local-authority rates departments. Finally, the paper discusses the interpretation and usefulness of the information obtained from DEA assessments involving weights constraints.     

Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure

It is important to consider the decision making unit (DMU)'s or decision maker's preference over the potential adjustments of various inputs and outputs when data envelopment analysis (DEA) is employed. On the basis of the so-called Russell measure, this paper develops some weighted non-radial CCR models by specifying a proper set of ‘preference weights’ that reflect the relative degree of desirability of the potential adjustments of current input or output levels. These input or output adjustments can be either less or greater than one; that is, the approach enables certain inputs actually to be increased, or certain outputs actually to be decreased. It is shown that the preference structure prescribes fixed weights (virtual multiplier bounds) or regions that invalidate some virtual multipliers and hence it generates preferred (efficient) input and output targets for each DMU. In addition to providing the preferred target, the approach gives a scalar efficiency score for each DMU to secure comparability. It is also shown how specific cases of our approach handle non-controllable factors in DEA and measure allocative and technical efficiency. Finally, the methodology is applied with the industrial performance of 14 open coastal cities and four special economic zones in 1991 in China. As applied here, the DEA/preference structure model refines the original DEA model's result and eliminates apparently efficient DMUs.     

A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is the leading technique for measuring the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) on the basis of multiple inputs and multiple outputs. In this technique, the weights for inputs and outputs are estimated in the best advantage for each unit so as to maximize its relative efficiency. But, this flexibility in selecting the weights deters the comparison among DMUs on a common base. For dealing with this difficulty, Kao and Hung (2005) proposed a compromise solution approach for generating common weights under the DEA framework. The proposed multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) model was derived from the original non-linear DEA model. This paper presents an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach by means of introducing an MCDM model which is derived from a new linear DEA model.     

Super-efficiency in DEA by effectiveness of each unit in society

One of the most important topics in management science is determining the efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs). The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique is employed for this purpose. In many DEA models, the best performance of a DMU is indicated by an efficiency score of one. There is often more than one DMU with this efficiency score. To rank and compare efficient units, many methods have been introduced under the name of super-efficiency methods. Among these methods, one can mention Andersen and Petersen’s (1993) [1] super-efficiency model, and the slack-based measure introduced by Tone (2002) [4]. Each of the methods proposed for ranking efficient DMUs has its own advantages and shortcomings. In this paper, we present a super-efficiency method by which units that are more effective and useful in society have better ranks. In fact, in order to determine super-efficiency by this method, the effectiveness of each unit in society is considered rather than the cross-comparison of the units. To do so, we divide the inputs and outputs into two groups, desirable and undesirable, at the discretion of the manager, and assign weights to each input and output. Then we determine the rank of each DMU according to the weights and the desirability of inputs and outputs.     

Data envelopment analysis with nonlinear virtual inputs and outputs

An underlying assumption in DEA is that the weights coupled with the ratio scales of the inputs and outputs imply linear value functions. In this paper, we present a general modeling approach to deal with outputs and/or inputs that are characterized by nonlinear value functions. To this end, we represent the nonlinear virtual outputs and/or inputs in a piece-wise linear fashion. We give the CCR model that can assess the efficiency of the units in the presence of nonlinear virtual inputs and outputs. Further, we extend the models with the assurance region approach to deal with concave output and convex input value functions. Actually, our formulations indicate a transformation of the original data set to an augmented data set where standard DEA models can then be applied, remaining thus in the grounds of the standard DEA methodology. To underline the usefulness of such a new development, we revisit a previous work of one of the authors dealing with the assessment of the human development index on the light of DEA.     

On relations between DEA-risk models and stochastic dominance efficiency tests

In this paper, several concepts of portfolio efficiency testing are compared, based either on data envelopment analysis (DEA) or the second-order stochastic dominance (SSD) relation: constant return to scale DEA models, variable return to scale (VRS) DEA models, diversification-consistent DEA models, pairwise SSD efficiency tests, convex SSD efficiency tests and full SSD portfolio efficiency tests. Especially, the equivalence between VRS DEA model with binary weights and the SSD pairwise efficiency test is proved. DEA models equivalent to convex SSD efficiency tests and full SSD portfolio efficiency tests are also formulated. In the empirical application, the efficiency testing of 48 US representative industry portfolios using all considered DEA models and SSD tests is presented. The obtained efficiency sets are compared. A special attention is paid to the case of small number of the inputs and outputs. It is empirically shown that DEA models equivalent either to the convex SSD test or to the SSD portfolio efficiency test work well even with quite small number of inputs and outputs. However, the reduced VRS DEA model with binary weights is not able to identify all the pairwise SSD efficient portfolios.     

�������ݾ�ֵ��Э����������Ч�Ƚ�����

In this article, we develop efficient robust method for estimation of mean and covariance simultaneously for longitudinal data in regression model. Based on Cholesky decomposition for the covariance matrix and rewriting the regression model, we propose a weighted least square estimator, in which the weights are estimated under generalized empirical likelihood framework. The proposed estimator obtains high efficiency from the close connection to empirical likelihood method, and achieves robustness by bounding the weighted sum of squared residuals. Simulation study shows that, compared to existing robust estimation methods for longitudinal data, the proposed estimator has relatively high efficiency and comparable robustness. In the end, the proposed method is used to analyse a real data set.     

Analysing Policy Effectiveness Using Cone Restricted Data Envelopment Analysis

Reducing weight flexibility has been suggested as a method for ensuring that the solution to data envelopment analyses do not give unreasonably low weightings to certain inputs or outputs. In this paper we extend the use of reducing weight flexibility and use it to model the effects of the decision-making unit's objectives on its efficiency relative to other DMUs with possibly different objectives. We show how such an approach can identify situations in which the weights imputed by a data envelopment analysis can be inconsistent with the decision-making weights used by the firm, and how this approach can be used to provide efficiency measures that are consistent with the DMU's own objectives. The method allows the analyst to distinguish between a decision-making unit's technological inefficiency and its inability to implement its own policies.     

Unobservable or omitted production variables in data envelopment analysis through unit-specific production trade-offs

The paper focuses upon situations in which decision-making units carry out their production activities with some inputs or outputs unobservable (or possibly omitted), and when there are a priori known constraints on the relative significance of otherwise observable (or explicitly considered) inputs and outputs. For such settings, the paper proposes a modification that alters traditional construction of the production possibility set and isolates the role of the unobservable (or omitted) variables in production by means of restrictions on virtual inputs and outputs being converted into production trade-offs. In effect, the proposed procedure induces unit-specific production possibility sets that derive from production trade-offs framed for units assessed separately to reflect their specific observed production conditions. The modification is implemented within a weighted slacks-based measure with restricted direction of slacks in order to make technical efficiency measurement more informative and consistent with the operating conditions under which production activities are accomplished. These ideas are illustrated and models implemented in a case study of bank branch performance measurement.     

Congestion analysis in DEA inputs under weight restrictions

Data envelopment analysis (DEA), which is used to determine the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU), is able to recognize the amount of input congestion. Moreover, the relative importance of inputs and outputs can be incorporated into DEA models by weight restrictions. These restrictions or a priori weights are introduced by the decision maker and lead to changes in models and efficiency interpretation. In this paper, we present an approach to determine the value of congestion in inputs under the weight restrictions. Some discussions show how weight restrictions can affect the congestion amount.     

Multiobjective data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is popularly used to evaluate relative efficiency among public or private firms. Most DEA models are established by individually maximizing each firm's efficiency according to its advantageous expectation by a ratio. Some scholars have pointed out the interesting relationship between the multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problem and the DEA problem. They also introduced the common weight approach to DEA based on MOLP. This paper proposes a new linear programming problem for computing the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU). The proposed model differs from traditional and existing multiobjective DEA models in that its objective function is the difference between inputs and outputs instead of the outputs/inputs ratio. Then an MOLP problem, based on the introduced linear programming problem, is formulated for the computation of common weights for all DMUs. To be precise, the modified Chebychev distance and the ideal point of MOLP are used to generate common weights. The dual problem of this model is also investigated. Finally, this study presents an actual case study analysing R&D efficiency of 10 TFT-LCD companies in Taiwan to illustrate this new approach. Our model demonstrates better performance than the traditional DEA model as well as some of the most important existing multiobjective DEA models.     

The measurement of relative efficiency using data envelopment analysis with assurance regions that link inputs and outputs

The most popular weight restrictions are assurance regions (ARs), which impose ratios between weights to be within certain ranges. ARs can be categorized into two types: ARs type I (ARI) and ARs type II (ARII). ARI specify bounds on ratios between input weights or between output weights, whilst ARII specify bounds on ratios that link input to output weights. DEA models with ARI successfully maximize relative efficiency, but in the presence of ARII the DEA models may under-estimate relative efficiency or may become infeasible. In this paper we discuss the problems that can occur in the presence of ARII and propose a new nonlinear model that overcomes the limitations discussed. Also, the dual model is described, which enables the assessment of relative efficiency when trade-offs between inputs and outputs are specified. The application of the model developed is illustrated in the efficiency assessment of Portuguese secondary schools.     

The constrained minimum weighted sum of job completion times problem

We consider the problem of minimizing the weighted sum of job completion times on a single machine (subject to certain job weights) with an additional side constraint on the weighted sum of job completion times (with respect to different job weights). This problem is NP-hard, and we provide a polynomial time approximation scheme for this problem. Our method is based on Lagrangian relaxation mixed with carefully guessing the positions of certain jobs in the schedule. An earlier version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 10th International IPCO Conference.