A Cobalt(I) Pincer Complex with an η2‐Caryl−H Agostic Bond: Facile C−H Bond Cleavage through Deprotonation,Radical Abstraction,and Oxidative Addition

The synthesis and reactivity of a Co^I pincer complex [Co(?³P,CH,P‐P(CH)P^NMe‐iPr)(CO)₂]⁺ featuring an η²‐ C_aryl?H agostic bond is described. This complex was obtained by protonation of the Co^I complex [Co(PCP^NMe‐iPr)(CO)₂]. The Co^III hydride complex [Co(PCP^NMe‐iPr)(CNtBu)₂(H)]⁺ was obtained upon protonation of [Co(PCP^NMe‐iPr)(CNtBu)₂]. Three ways to cleave the agostic C?H bond are presented. First, owing to the acidity of the agostic proton, treatment with pyridine results in facile deprotonation (C?H bond cleavage) and reformation of [Co(PCP^NMe‐iPr)(CO)₂]. Second, C?H bond cleavage is achieved upon exposure of [Co(?³P,CH,P‐P(CH)P^NMe‐iPr)(CO)₂]⁺ to oxygen or TEMPO to yield the paramagnetic Co^II PCP complex [Co(PCP^NMe‐iPr)(CO)₂]⁺. Finally, replacement of one CO ligand in [Co(?³P,CH,P‐P(CH)P^NMe‐iPr)(CO)₂]⁺ by CNtBu promotes the rapid oxidative addition of the agostic η²‐C_aryl?H bond to give two isomeric hydride complexes of the type [Co(PCP^NMe‐iPr)(CNtBu)(CO)(H)]⁺.     

Cobalt(II) Complexes with N‐Thioacylamidophosphates and 2,2′‐Bipyridyl and 1,10‐Phenathroline. Crystal Structures,Solution 1H NMR Spectral and Magnetic Properties

Structure and magnetic properties of N‐diisopropoxyphosphorylthiobenzamide PhC(S)‐N(H)‐P(O)(OiPr)₂ ( HL^I ) and N‐diisopropoxyphosphoryl‐N′‐phenylthiocarbamide PhN(H)‐C(S)‐N(H)‐P(O)(OiPr)₂ ( HL^II ) complexes with the Co^II cation of formulas [Co{PhC(S)‐N‐P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂] ( 1 ), [Co{PhN(H)‐C(S)‐N‐P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂] ( 2 ), [Co{PhC(S)‐N(H)‐P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂{PhC(S)‐N‐P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂] ( 1a ) and [Co{PhC(S)‐N‐P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂}(2,2′‐bipy)] ( 3 ), [Co{PhC(S)‐N‐P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂(1,10‐phen)] ( 4 ), [Co{PhN(H)‐C(S)‐N‐P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂(2,2′‐bipy)] ( 5 ), [Co{PhN(H)‐C(S)‐N‐P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂(1,10‐phen)] ( 6 ) were investigated. Paramagnetic shifts in the ¹H NMR spectrum were observed for high‐spin Co^II complexes with HL^I,II , incorporating the S‐C‐N‐P‐O chelate moiety and two aromatic chelate ligands. Investigation of the thermal dependence of the magnetic susceptibility has shown that the extended materials 1‐2 and 6 show ferromagnetic exchange between distorted tetrahedral ( 1 , 2 ) or octahedral ( 1a , 6 ) metal atoms whereas 3 and 5 show antiferromagnetic properties. Compound 4 behaves as a spin‐canted ferromagnet, an antiferromagnetic ordering taking place below a critical temperature, T_c = 115 K. Complexes 1 and 1a were investigated by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The cobalt(II) atom in complex 1 resides a distorted tetrahedral O₂S₂ environment formed by the C=S sulfur atoms and the P=O oxygen atoms of two deprotonated ligands. Complex 1a has a tetragonal‐bipyramidal structure, Co(O^ax)₂(O^eq)₂(S^eq)₂, and two neutral ligand molecules are coordinated in the axial positions through the oxygen atoms of the P=O groups. The base of the bipyramid is formed by two anionic ligands in the typical 1,5‐O,S coordination mode. The ligands are in a trans configuration.     

Ring Opening and Bidentate Coordination of Amidinate Germylenes and Silylenes on Carbonyl Dicobalt Complexes: The Importance of a Slight Difference in Ligand Volume

The reactions of [Co₂(CO)₈] with one equiv of the benzamidinate (R₂bzam) group‐14 tetrylenes [M(R₂bzam)(HMDS)] (HMDS=N(SiMe₃)₂; 1 : M=Ge, R=iPr; 2 : M=Si, R=tBu; 3 : M=Ge, R=tBu) at 20 °C led to the monosubstituted complexes [Co₂{κ¹M?M(R₂bzam)(HMDS)}(CO)₇] ( 4 : M=Ge, R=iPr; 5 : M=Si, R=tBu; 6 : M=Ge, R=tBu), which contain a terminal κ¹M–tetrylene ligand. Whereas the Co₂Si and Co₂Ge tert‐butyl derivatives 5 and 6 are stable at 20 °C, the Co₂Ge isopropyl derivative 4 evolved to the ligand‐bridged derivative [Co₂{μ‐κ²Ge,N‐Ge(iPr₂bzam)(HMDS)}(μ‐CO)(CO)₅] ( 7 ), in which the Ge atom spans the Co?Co bond and one arm of the amidinate fragment is attached to a Co atom. The mechanism of this reaction has been modeled with the help of DFT calculations, which have also demonstrated that the transformation of amidinate‐tetrylene ligands on the dicobalt framework is negligibly influenced by the nature of the group‐14 metal atom (Si or Ge) but is strongly dependent upon the volume of the amidinate N?R groups. The disubstituted derivatives [Co₂{κ¹M?M(R₂bzam)(HMDS)}₂(CO)₆] ( 8 : M=Ge, R=iPr; 9 : M=Si, R=tBu; 10 : M=Ge, R=tBu), which contain two terminal κ¹M–tetrylene ligands, have been prepared by treating [Co₂(CO)₈] with two equiv of 1 – 3 at 20 °C. The IR spectra of 8 – 10 have shown that the basicity of germylenes 1 and 3 is very high (comparable to that of trialkylphosphanes and 1,3‐diarylimidazol‐2‐ylidenes), whereas that of silylene 2 is even higher.     

An Experimental Evidence of a Metal−Metal Bond in μ‐Carbonylhexacarbonyl[μ‐(5‐oxofuran‐2(5H)‐ylidene‐κC,κC)]‐dicobalt(Co−Co)[Co2(CO)6(μ‐CO)(μ‐C4O2H2)]

The orthorhombic crystal structure of [Co₂(CO)₆(μ‐CO)(μ‐C₄O₂H₂)] ( 1 ) was determined at 150 K (Fig. 1). Two C−H⋅⋅⋅O bonds connect the molecules, forming waving ribbons along the b axis. The experimental electron density, determined with the aspherical‐atom formalism, was analyzed with the topological theory of molecular structure. The presence of the Co−Co bond critical point indicates for the first time the existence of a metal−metal bond in a system with bridged ligands. The bond critical properties of the intramolecular bonds and of the intermolecular interactions show features similar to those found in [Mn₂(CO)₁₀], confirming our previously established bonding classification for organometallic and coordination compounds.     

Binuclear Aromatic C−H Bond Activation at a Dirhenium Site

The electronically unsaturated dirhenium complex [Re₂(CO)₈(μ‐H)(μ‐Ph)] ( 1 ) has been found to exhibit aromatic C?H activation upon reaction with N,N‐diethylaniline, naphthalene, and even [D₆]benzene to yield the compounds [Re₂(CO)₈(μ‐H)(μ‐η¹‐NEt₂C₆H₄)] ( 2 ), [Re₂(CO)₈(μ‐H)(μ‐η²‐1,2‐C₁₀H₇)] ( 3 ), and [D₆]‐ 1 , respectively, in good yields. The mechanism has been elucidated by using DFT computational analyses, and involves a binuclear C?H bond‐activation process.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Unprecedented Reaction Pathway of Sterically Crowded Calcium Complexes: Sequential C−N Bond Cleavage Reactions Induced by C−H Bond Activations

Five bis(quinolylmethyl)‐(1H ‐indolylmethyl)amine (BQIA) compounds, that is, {(quinol‐8‐yl‐CH₂)₂NCH₂(3‐Br‐1H ‐indol‐2‐yl)} ( L¹H ) and {[(8‐R³‐quinol‐2‐yl)CH₂]₂NCH(R²)[3‐R¹‐1H ‐indol‐2‐yl]} ( L^2–5H ) ( L²H : R¹=Br, R²=H, R³=H; L³H : R¹=Br, R²=H, R³=i Pr; L⁴H : R¹=H, R²=CH₃, R³=i Pr; L⁵H : R¹=H, R²=n Bu, R³=i Pr) were synthesized and used to prepare calcium complexes. The reactions of L^1–5H with silylamido calcium precursors (Ca[N(SiMe₂R)₂]₂(THF)₂, R=Me or H) at room temperature gave heteroleptic products ( L^{1, 2} )CaN(SiMe₃)₂ ( 1 , 2 ), ( L^{3, 4} )CaN(SiHMe₂)₂ ( 3 a , 4 a ) and homoleptic complexes ( L^{3, 5} )₂Ca ( D3 , D5 ). NMR and X‐ray analyses proved that these calcium complexes were stabilized through Ca⋅⋅⋅C−Si, Ca⋅⋅⋅H−Si or Ca⋅⋅⋅H−C agostic interactions. Unexpectedly, calcium complexes (( L^3–5 )CaN(SiMe₃)₂) bearing more sterically encumbered ligands of the same type were extremely unstable and underwent C−N bond cleavage processes as a consequence of intramolecular C−H bond activation, leading to the exclusive formation of (E )‐1,2‐bis(8‐isopropylquinol‐2‐yl)ethane.     

Cationic Platinum(II) σ‐SiH Complexes in Carbon Dioxide Hydrosilation

The low‐electron‐count cationic platinum complex [Pt(ItBu’)(ItBu)][BAr^F], 1 , interacts with primary and secondary silanes to form the corresponding σ‐SiH complexes. According to DFT calculations, the most stable coordination mode is the uncommon η¹‐SiH. The reaction of 1 with Et₂SiH₂ leads to the X‐ray structurally characterized 14‐electron Pt^II species [Pt(SiEt₂H)(ItBu)₂][BAr^F], 2 , which is stabilized by an agostic interaction. Complexes 1 , 2 , and the hydride [Pt(H)(ItBu)₂][BAr^F], 3 , catalyze the hydrosilation of CO₂, leading to the exclusive formation of the corresponding silyl formates at room temperature.     

Facile Access to Transition‐Metal–Carbonyl Complexes with an Amidinate‐Stabilized Chlorosilylene Ligand

Three transition‐metal–carbonyl complexes [V( L )(CO)₃(Cp)] ( 1 ), [Co( L )(CO)(Cp)] ( 2 ), and [Co( L₂ )(CO)₃]⁺[CoCO)₄]^? ( 3 ), each containing stable N‐heterocyclic‐chlorosilylene ligands ( L ; L =PhC(NtBu)₂SiCl) were synthesized from [V(CO)₄(Cp)], [Co(CO)₂(Cp)], and Co₂(CO)₈, respectively. Complexes 1 , 2 , 3 were characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy, EI‐MS spectrometry, and elemental analysis. The molecular structures of compounds 1 , 2 , 3 were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Synthesis and Structures of New Oxidation/ Cycloaddition Products of λ3‐Cyclodiphosphazanes

Reaction of the cyclodiphosphazane [(OC₄H₈N)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P(HN‐t‐Bu)] ( 1 ) with an equimolar quantity of diisopropyl azodicarboxylate afforded the phosphinimine product [(OC₄H₈N)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂ ‐i‐Pr)NHCO₂‐i‐Pr] ( 6 ) having a P^III‐N‐P^V skeleton. Similar products [(t‐BuNH)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂Et)NHCO₂Et] ( 7 ) and [(CO₂‐i‐Pr)HNN(CO₂‐i‐Pr)](t‐BuN=P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂POCH₂CMe₂CH₂O[P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂‐i‐Pr)NH(CO₂‐i‐Pr)] ( 8 ) were spectroscopically characterized in the reaction of [(t‐BuNH)P‐N‐t‐Bu]₂ ( 2 ) and [(t‐BuNH)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂POCH₂CMe₂CH₂OP(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P(NH‐t‐Bu)] ( 3 ) with diethyl‐ and diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, respectively. By contrast, the reaction of [(μ‐t‐BuN)P]₂[O‐6‐t‐Bu‐4‐Me‐C₆H₂]₂CH₂ ( 4 ) and [(C₅H₁₀N)P‐μ‐N‐t‐Bu]₂ ( 5 ) with diisopropyl azodicarboxylate afforded the mono‐ and bis‐oxidized compounds [(O)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P][O‐6‐t‐Bu‐4‐Me‐C₆H₂]₂CH₂ ( 9 ) and [(C₅H₁₀N)(O)P‐μ‐N‐t‐Bu]₂ ( 10 ), respectively. Oxidative addition of o‐chloranil to 7 and its DIAD analogue [(t‐BuNH)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂‐i‐Pr)NHCO₂‐i‐Pr] ( 11 ) afforded [(C₆Cl₄‐1, 2‐O₂)(t‐BuNH)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂R)NHCO₂R] [R = Et ( 12 ) and i‐Pr ( 13 )] containing tetra‐ and pentacoordinate P^V atoms in the cyclodiphosphazane ring. The structures of 6 , 9 , 12 and 13 have been confirmed by X‐ray structure determination. For comparison, the X‐ray structure of the double cycloaddition product [(C₆Cl₄‐1, 2‐O₂)(t‐BuNH)PN‐t‐Bu]₂ ( 14 ), obtained from the reaction of 2 with two mole equivalents of o‐chloranil is also reported.     

1‐Azonia‐2‐boratanaphthalenes

The 1‐azonia‐2‐boratanaphthalenes (NH)(BX)C₈H₆ can be synthesized from 2‐aminostyrene and the dihaloboranes XBHal₂ ( 1 ‐ 4 : X = Cl, Br, iPr, tBu). Further derivatives (NH)(BX)C₈H₆ are obtained from 1 by replacing Cl by alkoxy or alkyl groups [ 5 ‐ 8 : X = OMe, OtBu, Me, (CH₂)₃NMe₂]. The hydrolysis of 1 gives a mixture of the bis(azoniaboratanaphthyl) oxide [(NH)BC₈H₆]₂O ( 9 ) and the hydroxy derivative (NH)[B(OH)]C₈H₆ ( 10 ). The diboryl oxide 9 crystallizes in the space group C2/c. The lithiation of 4 at the nitrogen atom gives [NLi(tmen)](BtBu)C₈H₆ ( 11 ), which upon reaction with the diborane(4) B₂Cl₂(NMe₂)₂ yields the 1, 2‐bis(azoniaboratanaphthyl)diborane B₂[N(BtBu)C₈H₆]₂(NMe₂)₂ ( 12 ). The 2‐chloro‐1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl derivative (NMe)(BCl)C₈H₅Ph ( 13 ) of the parent (NH)(BH)C₈H₆ can be synthesized from the aminoborane BCl₂(NMePh) and phenylethyne. Substitution of Cl in 13 gives the derivatives (NMe)(BX)C₈H₅Ph [ 14 ‐ 20 : X = N(SiMe₃)₂, Me, Et, iBu, tBu, CH₂SiMe₃, Ph] and the reaction of 13 with Li₂O affords the bis(azoniaboratanaphthyl) oxide [(NMe)BC₈H₅Ph]₂O ( 21 ). The reaction of 16 or 19 with [(MeCN)₃Cr(CO)₃] yields the complexes [{(NMe)(BX)C₈H₅Ph}Cr(CO)₃] ( 22 , 23 : X = Et, CH₂SiMe₃), in which the chromium atom is hexahapto bound to the homoarene part of 16 or 19 , respectively. The complex 23 crystallizes in the space group P2₁/c. Upon reaction of the phenols para‐C₆H₄R(OH) with the aryldichloroboranes ArBCl₂ and subsequent condensation of the products with phenylethyne, the 1‐oxonia‐2‐boratanaphthalenes O(BAr)C₈H₄RPh with R in position 6 and Ph in position 4 are formed ( 24 ‐ 26 : Ar = Ph, R = H, Me, OMe; 27 ‐ 29 : Ar = C₆F₅, R = H, Me, OMe). The azoniaboratanaphthalenes 1 ‐ 23 were characterized by NMR methods.     

Neutral and Anionic Monomeric Zirconium Imides Prepared via Selective C=N Bond Cleavage of a Multidentate and Sterically Demanding β‐Diketiminato Ligand

A sterically encumbering multidentate β‐diketiminato ligand, ^tBuL2 (^tBuL2=[ArNC(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]^?, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃), is reported in this study along with its coordination chemistry to zirconium(IV). Using the lithio salt of this ligand, Li(^tBuL2) ( 4 ), the zirconium(IV) precursor (^tBuL2)ZrCl₃ ( 6 ) could be readily prepared in 85 % yield and structurally characterized. Reduction of 6 with 2 equiv of KC₈ resulted in formation of the terminal and mononuclear zirconium imide‐chloride [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]Zr(=NAr)(Cl) ( 7 ) as the result of reductive C=N cleavage of the imino fragment in the multidentate ligand ^tBuL2 by an elusive Zr^II species (^tBuL2)ZrCl ( A ). The azabutadienyl ligand in 7 can be further reduced by 2 e^? with KC₈ to afford the anionic imide [K(THF)₂]{[CH(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂]Zr=NAr} ( 8‐2THF ) in 42 % isolated yield. Complex 8‐2THF results from the oxidative addition of an amine C?H bond followed by migration to the vinylic group of the formal [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]^? ligand in 7 . All halides in 6 can be replaced with azides to afford (^tBuL2)Zr(N₃)₃ ( 9 ) which was structurally characterized, and reduction with two equiv of KC₈ also results in C=N bond cleavage of ^tBuL2 to form [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]Zr(=NAr)(N₃) ( 10 ), instead of the expected azide disproportionation to N^3? and N₂. Solid‐state single crystal structural studies confirm the formation of mononuclear and terminal zirconium imido groups in 7 , 8‐Et₂O , and 10 with Zr=NAr distances being 1.8776(10), 1.9505(15), and 1.881(3) Å, respectively.     

Ortho-aryl substituted DPEphos ligands: rhodium complexes featuring C–H anagostic interactions and B–H agostic bonds

The synthesis of new Schrock–Osborn Rh(i) pre-catalysts with ortho-substituted DPEphos ligands, [Rh(DPEphos-R)(NBD)][BAr^F₄] [R = Me, OMe, ⁱPr; Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃], is described. Along with the previously reported R = H variant, variable temperature ¹H NMR spectroscopic and single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies show that these all have axial (C–H)⋯Rh anagostic interactions relative to the d⁸ pseudo square planar metal centres, that also result in corresponding downfield chemical shifts. Analysis by NBO, QTAIM and NCI methods shows these to be only very weak C–H⋯Rh bonding interactions, the magnitudes of which do not correlate with the observed chemical shifts. Instead, as informed by Scherer''s approach, it is the topological positioning of the C–H bond with regard to the metal centre that is important. For [Rh(DPEphos–ⁱPr)(NBD)][BAr^F₄] addition of H₂ results in a Rh(iii) ⁱPr–C–H activated product, [Rh(κ³,σ-P,O,P-DPEphos-ⁱPr′)(H)][BAr^F₄]. This undergoes H/D exchange with D₂ at the ⁱPr groups, reacts with CO or NBD to return Rh(i) products, and reaction with H₃B·NMe₃/tert-butylethene results in a dehydrogenative borylation to form a complex that shows both a non-classical B–H⋯Rh 3c-2e agostic bond and a C–H⋯Rh anagostic interaction at the same metal centre.

Rh(i) complexes of ortho-substituted DPEphos-R (R = H, Me, OMe, ⁱPr) ligands show anagostic interactions; for R =ⁱPr C–H activation/dehydrogenative borylation forms a product exhibiting both B–H/Rh 3c-2e agostic and C–H/Rh anagostic motifs.     

Kristallstrukturelle,Festkörper‐31P‐CP/MAS‐NMR,TOSS, 31P‐COSY‐NMR und mechanistische Beiträge zur Koordinationschemie des Octacarbonyldicobalts mit den Liganden Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)amin,Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methan und 1,1,1‐Tris(diphenylphosphanyl)ethan

Chemistry of Polyfunctional Molecules. 133. X‐Ray Crystal Structural, Solid‐state ³¹P CP/MAS NMR, TOSS, ³¹P COSY NMR, and Mechanistic Contributions to the Co‐ordination Chemistry of Octacarbonyldicobalt with the Ligands Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)amine, Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane, and 1,1,1‐Tris(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane Co₂(CO)₈ reacts with bis(diphenylphosphanyl)amine, HN(PPh₂)₂ (Hdppa, 1 ), in two steps to afford the known compound [Co(CO)(Hdppa‐κ²P)₂][Co(CO)₄] · 2 THF ( 6 a · 2 THF). The intermediate [Co(CO)₂(Hdppa‐κ²P) · (Hdppa‐κP)][Co(CO)₄] · dioxane · n‐pentane ( 5 · dioxane · n‐pentane) was isolated for the first time and was characterized by X‐ray analysis. The cation 5 ⁺ exhibits a slightly distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal geometry. Detailed ³¹P‐NMR investigations (solid‐state CP/MAS NMR, TOSS, ³¹P‐COSY, ³¹P‐EXSY) showed that the additional tautomer [Co(CO)₂(Hdppa‐κ²P)(Ph₂P–N=P(H)Ph₂‐κP)]⁺ ( 5 ′⁺) is present in solution. The tautomer equilibrium is slow in the NMR time scale. In contrast to the solid state only tetragonal pyramidal species of 5 are found in solution. At –90 °C there is slow exchange between the three diastereomeric species 5 a ⁺– 5 c ⁺. Compound 5 forms [Co(CO) · (Hdppa‐κ²P)₂]BPh₄ · THF ( 6 b · THF) in THF with NaBPh₄ under CO‐Elimination. A X‐ray diffraction investigation shows that the cation 6 ⁺ consists of a slightly distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal co‐ordination polyeder. However, a distorted tetragonal‐pyramidal structure has been found for the cation 7 ⁺ of the related compound [Co(CO)(dppm)₂][Co(CO)₄] · 2 THF ( 7 · 2 THF; dppm = bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane, Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). A comparison with the known [8] trigonal‐bipyramidal stereoisomer, ascertained for 7 ⁺ of the solvent‐free 7 , is described. In solutions of 6 a · 2 THF and 7 · 2 THF ¹³C{¹H}‐ and ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR spectra indicate an exchange of all CO and organophosphane molecules between cobalt(I) cation and cobalt(–I) anion. A concerted mechanism for the exchange process is discussed. CO elimination leads to discontinuance of the cyclic mechanism by forming binuclear substitution products such as the isolated Co₂(CO)₂ · (μ‐CO)₂(μ‐dppm)₂ · 0.83 THF ( 8 · 0.83 THF), which was characterized by spectroscopy and X‐ray analysis. For the dissolved [Co(CO)₂CH₃C(CH₂PPh₂)₃][Co(CO)₄] · 0.83 n‐pentane ( 9 a · 0.83 n‐pentane) no CO and triphos exchange processes between the cation and the anion are observed. Metathesis of 9 a · 0.83 n‐pentane with NaBPh₄ yields [Co(CO)₂CH₃C(CH₂PPh₂)₃]BPh₄ ( 9 b ) which has been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. The cation shows a small distorted tetragonal‐pyramidal structure.     

Photoinduced Cobalt(III)−Trifluoromethyl Bond Activation Enables Arene C−H Trifluoromethylation

Visible‐light capture activates a thermodynamically inert Co^III−CF₃ bond for direct C−H trifluoromethylation of arenes and heteroarenes. New trifluoromethylcobalt(III) complexes supported by a redox‐active [OCO] pincer ligand were prepared. Coordinating solvents, such as MeCN, afford green, quasi‐octahedral [(^SOCO)Co^III(CF₃)(MeCN)₂] ( 2 ), but in non‐coordinating solvents the complex is red, square pyramidal [(^SOCO)Co^III(CF₃)(MeCN)] ( 3 ). Both are thermally stable, and 2 is stable in light. But exposure of 3 to low‐energy light results in facile homolysis of the Co^III−CF₃ bond, releasing ^.CF₃ radical, which is efficiently trapped by TEMPO^. or (hetero)arenes. The homolytic aromatic substitution reactions do not require a sacrificial or substrate‐derived oxidant because the Co^II by‐product of Co^III−CF₃ homolysis produces H₂. The photophysical properties of 2 and 3 provide a rationale for the disparate light stability.     

Homolytic,Heterolytic, Mesolytic ‐ As You Like It: Steering the Cleavage of a HC(sp3)−C(sp3)H Bond in Bis(1H‐2,1‐benzazaborole) Derivatives

A set of (3,3′)‐bis(1‐Ph‐2‐R‐1H‐2,1‐benzazaborole) compounds, in which R=tBu (Bab‐tBu)₂ , R=Dipp (Bab‐Dipp)₂ or R=tBu and Dipp (Bab‐Dipp)(Bab‐tBu) , was synthesized and fully characterized using ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C, and ¹⁵N NMR spectroscopy as well as single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The central HC(sp³)?C(sp³)H bond with restricted rotation at the junction of both 1H‐2,1‐benzazaborole rings displayed an intriguing reactivity. It was demonstrated that this bond is easily mesolytically cleaved using alkali metals to form the respective aromatic 1Ph‐2R‐1H‐2,1‐benzazaborolyl anions M⁺(THF) _n (Bab‐tBu)^? (M=Li, Na, K) and K⁺(THF) _n (Bab‐Dipp)^? . Furthermore, the central HC(sp³)?C(sp³)H bond of bis(1H‐2,1‐benzazaborole)s is also homolytically cleaved either by heating or photochemical means, giving corresponding 1Ph‐2R‐1H‐2,1‐benzazaborolyl radicals (Bab‐tBu)^. and (Bab‐Dipp)^., which rapidly self‐terminate. Nevertheless, their formation was unambiguously established by NMR analysis of the reaction mixtures containing products of the self‐termination of the radicals after heating or irradiation. (Bab‐Dipp)^. radical was also characterized using EPR spectroscopy. Importantly, it turned out that the essentially non‐polarized HC(sp³)?C(sp³)H bond in (Bab‐tBu)₂ is also cleaved heterolytically with 2 equiv of MeLi, giving the mixture of Li⁺(SOL) _n (Bab‐tBu)^? (SOL=THF or Et₂O) and lithium methyl‐substituted borate complex Li⁺(SOL) _n (Bab‐tBu‐Me)^? in a diastereoselective fashion.     

Iron Borohydride Pincer Complexes for the Efficient Hydrogenation of Ketones under Mild,Base‐Free Conditions: Synthesis and Mechanistic Insight

The new, structurally characterized hydrido carbonyl tetrahydridoborate iron pincer complex [(iPr‐PNP)Fe(H)(CO)(η¹‐BH₄)] ( 1 ) catalyzes the base‐free hydrogenation of ketones to their corresponding alcohols employing only 4.1 atm hydrogen pressure. Turnover numbers up to 1980 at complete conversion of ketone were reached with this system. Treatment of 1 with aniline (as a BH₃ scavenger) resulted in a mixture of trans‐[(iPr‐PNP)Fe(H)₂(CO)] ( 4 a ) and cis‐[(iPr‐PNP)Fe(H)₂(CO)] ( 4 b ). The dihydrido complexes 4 a and 4 b do not react with acetophenone or benzaldehyde, indicating that these complexes are not intermediates in the catalytic reduction of ketones. NMR studies indicate that the tetrahydridoborate ligand in 1 dissociates prior to ketone reduction. DFT calculations show that the mechanism of the iron‐catalyzed hydrogenation of ketones involves alcohol‐assisted aromatization of the dearomatized complex [(iPr‐PNP*)Fe(H)(CO)] ( 7 ) to initially give the Fe⁰ complex [(iPr‐PNP)Fe(CO)] ( 21 ) and subsequently [(iPr‐PNP)Fe(CO)(EtOH)] ( 38 ). Concerted coordination of acetophenone and dual hydrogen‐atom transfer from the PNP arm and the coordinated ethanol to, respectively, the carbonyl carbon and oxygen atoms, leads to the dearomatized complex [(iPr‐PNP*)Fe(CO)(EtO)(MeCH(OH)Ph)] ( 32 ). The catalyst is regenerated by release of 1‐phenylethanol, followed by dihydrogen coordination and proton transfer to the coordinated ethoxide ligand.     

MAO‐free polymerization of propylene by rac‐ Me2Si(1‐C5H2‐2‐Me‐4‐tBu)2Zr(NMe2)2 compound

Ansa‐zirconocene diamide complex rac‐Me₂Si(CMB)₂Zr(NMe₂)₂ (rac‐1, CMB = 1‐C₅H₂‐2‐Me‐4‐^tBu) reacts with AlR₃ (R = Me, Et, i‐Bu) and then with [CPh₃]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]⁻ (2) in toluene in order to in situ generate cationic alkylzirconium species. In the sequential NMR‐scale reactions of rac‐1 with various amount of AlMe₃ and 2, rac‐1 transforms first to rac‐Me₂Si(CMB)₂Zr(Me)(NMe₂) (rac‐3) and rac‐Me₂Si(CMB)₂ZrMe₂ (rac‐4) by the reaction with AlMe₃, and then to [rac‐Me₂Si(CMB)₂ZrMe]⁺ (5⁺) cation by the reaction of the resulting mixtures with 2. The activities of propylene polymerizations by rac‐1/Al(i‐Bu)₃/2 system are dependent on the type and concentration of AlR₃, resulting in the order of activity: rac‐1/Al(i‐Bu)₃/2 > rac‐1/AlEt₃/2 > rac‐1/MAO ≫ rac‐1/AlMe₃/2 system. The bulkier isobutyl substituents make inactive catalytic species sterically unfavorable and give rise to more separated ion pairs so that the monomers can easily access to the active sites. The dependence of the maximum rate (R_{p, max}) on polymerization temperature (T_p) obtained by rac‐1/Al(i‐Bu)₃/2 system follows Arrhenius relation, and the overall activation energy corresponds to 0.34 kcal/mol. The molecular weight (MW) of the resulting isotactic polypropylene (iPP) is not sensitive to Al(i‐Bu)₃ concentration. The analysis of regiochemical errors of iPP shows that the chain transfer to Al(i‐Bu)₃ is a minor chain termination. The 1,3‐addition of propylene monomer is the main source of regiochemical sequence and the [mr] sequence is negligible, as a result the meso pentad ([mmmm]) values of iPPs are very high ([mmmm] > 94%). These results can explain the fact that rac‐1/Al(i‐Bu)₃/2 system keeps high activity over a wide range of [Al(i‐Bu)₃]/[Zr] ratio between 32 and 3,260. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 37: 1071–1082, 1999     

Facile P−C/C−H Bond‐Cleavage Reactivity of Nickel Bis(diphosphine) Complexes

Unusual cleavage of P?C and C?H bonds of the P₂N₂ ligand, in heteroleptic [Ni(P₂N₂)(diphosphine)]²⁺ complexes under mild conditions, results in the formation of an iminium formyl nickelate featuring a C,P,P‐tridentate coordination mode. The structures of both the heteroleptic [Ni(P₂N₂)(diphosphine)]²⁺ complexes and the resulting iminium formyl nickelate have been characterized by NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were employed to investigate the mechanism of the P?C/C?H bond cleavage, which involves C?H bond cleavage, hydride rotation, Ni?C/P?H bond formation, and P?C bond cleavage.     

Neue Kupferkomplexe mit Phosphaalkenliganden. Molekülstruktur von [Cu{P(Mes*)C(NMe2)2}2]BF4 (Mes* = 2,4,6‐tBu3C6H2)

New Copper Complexes Containing Phosphaalkene Ligands. Molecular Structure of [Cu{P(Mes*)C(NMe₂)₂}₂]BF₄ (Mes* = 2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂) Reaction of equimolar amounts of the inversely polarized phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1a ) and copper(I) bromide or copper(I) iodide, respectively, affords complexes [Cu₃X₃{μ‐P(tBu)C(NMe₂)₂}₃] ( 2 ) (X =Br) and ( 3 ) (X = I) as the formal result of the cyclotrimerization of a 1:1‐adduct. Treatment of 1a with [Cu(L)Cl] (L = PiPr₃; SbiPr₃) leads to the formation of compounds [CuCl(L){P(tBu)C(NMe₂)₂}] ( 4a ) (L = PiPr₃) and ( 4b ) (L = SbiPr₃), respectively. Reaction of [(MeCN)₄Cu]BF₄ with two equivalents of PhP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1b ) yields complex [Cu{P(Ph)C(NMe₂)₂}₂]BF₄ ( 5b ). Similarly, compounds [Cu{P(Aryl)C(NMe₂)₂}₂]BF₄ ( 5c (Aryl = Mes and 5d (Aryl = Mes*)) are obtained from ArylP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1c : Aryl = Mes; 1d : Mes*) and [(MeCN)₄Cu]BF₄ in the presence of SbiPr₃. Complexes 2 , 3 , 4a , 4b , and 5b‐5d are characterized by means of elemental analyses and spectroscopy (¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR). The molecular structure of 5d is determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.