Pyrone Diels–Alder Routes to Indolines and Hydroindolines: Syntheses of Gracilamine,Mesembrine, and Δ7‐Mesembrenone

Although the Diels–Alder reaction has long been utilized for the preparation of numerous heterocycles, opportunities to extend its power remain. Herein, we detail a simple, modular, and robust approach that combines various amines regioselectively with 4,6‐dichloropyrone to create substrates which, under appropriate conditions, can directly deliver varied indolines and hydroindolines through [4+2] cycloadditions with substitution patterns difficult to access otherwise. As an initial demonstration of the power of the strategy, several different natural products have been obtained either formally or by direct total synthesis, with efforts toward one of these—the complex amaryllidaceae alkaloid gracilamine—affording the shortest route to date in terms of linear step count.     

5‐Chloro‐2‐hydroxybenzophenone,featuring O—H...O,C—H...O,C—H...π and π–π interactions

Molecules of the title compound, C₁₃H₉ClO₂, contain an intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond, and the two aromatic rings are inclined at 57.02 (3)° with respect to one another. The crystal structure is supported by C—H...O, C—H...π and π–π interactions.     

1,3:16,18‐Bis­(xylyl)‐30‐crown‐8

The title crown ether, C₂₈H₄₀O₈, crystallizes in an ortho­rhombic cell with the full mol­ecule generated from crystallographic inversion symmetry. The ring consists of 30 atoms which could potentially influence the size of the ring cavity and the conformational flexibility. Unusual C—O—C—C and O—C—C—O torsion‐angle geometries, deviating by as much as 30° from their ideal values, have been observed.     

Side‐chain conformations in the isomorphous polyfluorinated {4,4′‐bis[(2,2‐difluoroethoxy)methyl]‐2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ2N,N′}dichloridopalladium and ‐platinum complexes

The polyfluorinated title compounds, [M Cl₂(C₁₆H₁₆F₄N₂O₂)] or [4,4′‐(HCF₂CH₂OCH₂)₂‐2,2′‐bpy]M Cl₂ [M = Pd, ( 1 ), and M = Pt, ( 2 )], have –C(H_α)₂OC(H_β)₂CF₂H side chains with H‐atom donors at the α and β sites. The structures of ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) are isomorphous, with the nearly planar (bpy)M Cl₂ molecules stacked in columns. Within one column, π‐dimer pairs alternate between a π‐dimer pair reinforced with C—H…Cl hydrogen bonds (α,α) and a π‐dimer pair reinforced with C—H_β…F(—C) interactions (abbreviated as C—H_β…F—C,C—H_β…F—C). The compounds [4,4′‐(CF₃CH₂OCH₂)₂‐2,2′‐bpy]M Cl₂ [M = Pd, ( 3 ), and M = Pt, ( 4 )] have been reported to be isomorphous [Lu et al. (2012). J. Fluorine Chem. 137 , 54–56], yet with disorder in the fluorous regions. The molecules of ( 3 ) [or ( 4 )] also form similar stacks, but with alternating π‐dimer pairs between the (α,β; α,β) and (β,β) forms. Through (C—)H…Cl hydrogen‐bond interactions, one molecule of ( 1 ) [or ( 2 )] is expanded into an aggregate of two inversion‐related π‐dimer pairs, one pair in the (α,α) form and the other pair in the (C—H_β…F—C,C—H_β…F—C) form, with the plane normals making an interplanar angle of 58.24 (3)°. Due to the demands of maintaining a high coordination number around the metal‐bound Cl atoms in molecule ( 1 ) [or ( 2 )], the ponytails of molecule ( 1 ) [or ( 2 )] bend outward; in contrast, the ponytails of molecule ( 3 ) [or ( 4 )] bend inward.     

α‐Haloketal (1′R,4S,5S)‐dimethyl 2‐(1′‐bromoethyl)‐2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐1,3‐dioxolane‐4,5‐dicarboxylate

The crystal structure and absolute configuration of the title compound, C₁₇H₂₁BrO₈, have been determined by X‐ray analysis. They confirmed the 1′R absolute configuration at the 1′‐bromoethyl moiety which has been assigned previously on the basis of chemical and spectroscopic data. Cohesion of the crystal can be attributed to weak intermolecular C—H?O and van der Waals interactions.     

Glycosidic linkage,N‐acetyl side‐chain,and other structural properties of methyl 2‐acetamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d‐mannopyranoside monohydrate and related compounds

The crystal structure of methyl 2‐acetamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐glycopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐mannopyranoside monohydrate, C₁₅H₂₇NO₁₁·H₂O, was determined and its structural properties compared to those in a set of mono‐ and disaccharides bearing N‐acetyl side‐chains in βGlcNAc aldohexopyranosyl rings. Valence bond angles and torsion angles in these side chains are relatively uniform, but C—N (amide) and C—O (carbonyl) bond lengths depend on the state of hydrogen bonding to the carbonyl O atom and N—H hydrogen. Relative to N‐acetyl side chains devoid of hydrogen bonding, those in which the carbonyl O atom serves as a hydrogen‐bond acceptor display elongated C—O and shortened C—N bonds. This behavior is reproduced by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, indicating that the relative contributions of amide resonance forms to experimental C—N and C—O bond lengths depend on the solvation state, leading to expectations that activation barriers to amide cis–trans isomerization will depend on the polarity of the environment. DFT calculations also revealed useful predictive information on the dependencies of inter‐residue hydrogen bonding and some bond angles in or proximal to β‐(1→4) O‐glycosidic linkages on linkage torsion angles ? and ψ. Hypersurfaces correlating ? and ψ with the linkage C—O—C bond angle and total energy are sufficiently similar to render the former a proxy of the latter.     

4′‐Hydro­xy­bi­phenyl‐4‐carbo­nitrile

The title compound, C₁₃H₉NO, crystallizes with four mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. Each of the four crystallographically independent mol­ecules forms a chain parallel to the a axis with symmetry‐equivalent mol­ecules. These chains are held together by similar O—H·NC hydrogen bonds, with approximately linear O—H·N angles and significantly bent H·N—C angles. The four different mol­ecules are related by strong elements of pseudosymmetry. To better describe the pseudosymmetry, the structure has been reported in the non‐standard space group .     

5α‐Androst‐3‐en‐17‐one oxime

The title compound, C₁₉H₂₉NO, is a C17‐oxime derivative of a potent aromatase inhibitor, which surprisingly has been found to have no inhibitory power. It crystallizes with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. C=N—O—H...N hydrogen bonds link pairs of molecules to form dimers almost parallel to the bc plane. Cohesion of the structure is also due to another three C—H...O hydrogen bonds directed along the a axis. This hydrogen‐bonding scheme can be correlated to the almost complete loss of inhibitory power of the title compound.     

Synthesis of 1,4‐Cyclohexanedimethanol, 1,4‐Cyclohexanedicarboxylic Acid and 1,2‐Cyclohexanedicarboxylates from Formaldehyde,Crotonaldehyde and Acrylate/Fumarate

Valuable polyester monomers and plasticizers—1,4‐cyclohexanedimethanol (CHDM), 1,4‐cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid (CHDA), and 1,2‐cyclohexanedicarboxylates—have been prepared by a new strategy. The synthetic processes involve a proline‐catalyzed formal [3+1+2] cycloaddition of formaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, and acrylate (or fumarate). CHDM is produced after a subsequent hydrogenation step over a commercially available Cu/Zn/Al catalyst and a one‐pot hydrogenation/oxidation/hydrolysis process yields CHDA, whereas 1,2‐cyclohexanedicarboxylate is obtained by a Pd/C‐catalyzed tandem decarbonylation/hydrogenation step.     

Synthesis of 1,4‐Cyclohexanedimethanol, 1,4‐Cyclohexanedicarboxylic Acid and 1,2‐Cyclohexanedicarboxylates from Formaldehyde,Crotonaldehyde and Acrylate/Fumarate

Valuable polyester monomers and plasticizers—1,4‐cyclohexanedimethanol (CHDM), 1,4‐cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid (CHDA), and 1,2‐cyclohexanedicarboxylates—have been prepared by a new strategy. The synthetic processes involve a proline‐catalyzed formal [3+1+2] cycloaddition of formaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, and acrylate (or fumarate). CHDM is produced after a subsequent hydrogenation step over a commercially available Cu/Zn/Al catalyst and a one‐pot hydrogenation/oxidation/hydrolysis process yields CHDA, whereas 1,2‐cyclohexanedicarboxylate is obtained by a Pd/C‐catalyzed tandem decarbonylation/hydrogenation step.     

The first structurally analysed nucleic acid building block containing the Reese protecting group: 2′‐O‐[1‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐4‐methoxypiperidin‐4‐yl]‐β‐D‐(1′R,2′R,3′R,4′R)‐uridine

The title compound, C₂₁H₂₆FN₃O₇, is assembled by N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds into well‐separated two‐dimensional layers of about 15 Å thickness. The crescent conformation of the molecules is stabilized by weak intramolecular C—H...O and C—H...F hydrogen bonds. The uridine moiety adopts an anti conformation. The ribofuranose ring exists in an envelope conformation. All the endocyclic uracil bonds are shorter than normal single C—N and C—C bonds, and five of them have comparable lengths, which implies a considerable degree of delocalization of the electron density within this ring.     

Synthesis of Novel 3‐Aryl‐5‐dichloromethyl‐Δ2‐1,2,4‐oxadiazolines

The first synthetic approach to hitherto unknown 3‐aryl‐5‐dichloromethyl‐Δ²‐1,2,4‐oxadiazolines, of synthetic and biological interest, has been developed involving high‐yield reactions between N‐(2,2‐dichlorovinyl)benzimidoyl chlorides and hydroxylamine. The molecular structure of one member of this new family of compounds—5‐dichloromethyl‐3‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazoline—has been determined by X‐ray crystallography. Density functional theory calculations supporting the proposed reaction pathway for the formation of these products have been carried out.     

catena‐Poly­[[silver(I)‐μ‐hexane‐1,6‐di­amine‐κ2N:N′] cinnamate dihydrate]

The title compound, {[Ag(C₆H₁₆N₂)](C₉H₇O₂)·2H₂O}_n, has been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The Ag atom is coordinated in a linear configuration by two N atoms from two hexane‐1,6‐­diamine ligands, giving a zigzag polymeric chain with an [–Ag—N—C—C—C—C—C—C—N–]_n backbone running parallel to the c axis. In the crystal packing, adjacent chains interact with the anions via the lattice water mol­ecules, thus forming layers parallel to the bc plane.     

Chloro{2,2′‐[(1S,2S)‐1,2‐di­phenyl‐1,2‐ethanediyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ4O,N,N′,O′}(ethanol‐κO)­manganese(III)

The crystal structure of the title compound, [MnCl(C₂₈H₂₂N₂O₂)(C₂H₆O)], has been determined at 173 (2) K in the non‐centrosymmetric space group P2₁2₁2₁. The asymmetric unit contains two molecular units. An intermolecular O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bond is formed between the OH group of an ethanol mol­ecule coordinated to the Mn atom and the coordinated Cl⁻ anion, and so polymeric chains of Mn‐containing fragments are formed [O—H⋯Cl = 3.1281 (16) and 3.1282 (15) Å]. The Mn atoms have a pseudo‐octahedral coordination sphere, with the four donor atoms of the Schiff base forming an equatorial plane [Mn—O distances are 1.8740 (13), 1.8717 (13), 1.8749 (13) and 1.8823 (13) Å, and Mn—N distances are 1.9868 (15), 1.9910 (14), 1.9828 (15) and 1.9979 (14) Å]. The axial positions are occupied by an ethanol mol­ecule [Mn—O distances of 2.3069 (15) and 2.3130 (15) Å] and a Cl⁻ ligand [Mn—Cl distances of 2.5732 (6) and 2.5509 (6) Å].     

Magnetic Exchange Interactions in Dinuclear Copper(II) and Nickel(II) Complexes with μ‐Oxalato Bridges. The Structure of μ‐Oxalato(O,O′, O″, O‴)‐bis{[1, 8‐di(2‐pyridyl)‐3, 6‐dithiaoctane‐N,N′, S,S′]nickel(II)} Dinitrate Dihydrate

A copper(II) and two nickel(II) dinuclear oxalato‐bridged compounds of formulae [{Cu(bpdto)}₂(μ‐ox)](ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ), [{Ni(bpdto)]₂(μ‐ox)](ClO₄)₂( 2 ), and [{Ni(bpdto)}₂(μ‐ox)](NO₃)₂·2H₂O ( 3 ), where bpdto = 1, 8‐bis(2‐pyridyl)‐3, 6‐dithiaoctane and ox = oxalate = C₂O₄^2— anion, have been synthesized and characterized. The crystal structure of 3 was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. It is a dinuclear complex with i symmetry in which the oxalate ligand is coordinated in bis(didentate) fashion to the inversion centre‐related nickel atoms. The distorted octahedral environment of each nickel atom is completed by two sulphur atoms in the equatorial plane and by two pyridyl nitrogen atoms in axial positions. Magnetic susceptibility measurements over the range 5 — 299K, show antiferromagnetic interactions that are weak in 1 (J = —12.8 cm^—1) and strong in 2 and 3 (J = —37.8 and —40.9 cm^—1, respectively), which in the case of 3 is in keeping with the observed structural parameters.     

(5RS)‐6H‐Spiro[pyrazolo[1,5‐c]quinazoline‐5,4′‐thiochroman]: efficient synthesis under mild conditions,molecular structure and supramolecular assembly

Pyrazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolines are fused‐quinazoline derivatives which have been reported as potential agents against neurological disorders. The normal synthesis routes to these compounds require harsh reaction conditions, long reaction times or multistep sequences. The title compound, C₁₈H₁₅N₃S, has been prepared under very mild conditions by condensation of thiochroman‐4‐one with 5‐(2‐aminophenyl)‐1H‐pyrazole, which had itself been prepared by the reaction of hydrazine hydrate with 4‐hydroxyquinoline mediated by a brief period of microwave heating. Within the molecule in the crystal structure, the reduced pyrimidine ring adopts an envelope conformation, whereas the thiane ring adopts a half‐chair conformation. Molecules are linked into sheets by a combination of one N—H...S hydrogen bond and two independent C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds, which utilize the same aryl ring as the acceptor, with one C—H bond donating to each face of the ring. Comparisons are made with some related compounds.     

Synthesis and crystal structures of the potential tyrosinase inhibitors N‐(4‐acetylphenyl)‐2‐chloroacetamide and 2‐(4‐acetylanilino)‐2‐oxoethyl cinnamate

Substituted benzoic acid and cinnamic acid esters are of interest as tyrosinase inhibitors and the development of such inhibitors may help in diminishing many dermatological disorders. The tyrosinase enzyme has also been linked to Parkinson's disease. In view of hydroxylated compounds having ester and amide functionalities to potentially inhibit tyrosinase, we herein report the synthesis and crystal structures of two amide‐based derivatives, namely N‐(4‐acetylphenyl)‐2‐chloroacetamide, C₁₀H₁₀ClNO₂, (I), and 2‐(4‐acetylanilino)‐2‐oxoethyl cinnamate, C₁₉H₁₇NO₄, (II). In compound (I), the acetylphenyl ring and the N—(C=O)—C unit of the acetamide group are almost coplanar, with a dihedral angle of 7.39 (18)°. Instead of esterification, a cheaper and more efficient synthetic method has been developed for the preparation of compound (II). The molecular geometry of compound (II) is a V‐shape. The acetamide and cinnamate groups are almost planar, with mean deviations of 0.088 and 0.046 Å, respectively; the dihedral angle between these groups is 77.39 (7)°. The carbonyl O atoms are positioned syn and anti to the amide carbonyl O atom. In the crystals of (I) and (II), N—H…O, C—H…O and C—H…π interactions link the molecules into a three‐dimensional network.     

Copper(II) hypophosphite: the α‐ and β‐forms at 270 and 100 K,and the γ‐form at 270 K

Copper(II) hypophosphite has been shown to exist as several polymorphs. The crystal structures of monoclinic α‐, ortho­rhombic β‐ and ortho­rhombic γ‐Cu(H₂PO₂)₂ have been determined at different temperatures. The geometry of the hypophosphite anion in all three polymorphs is very close to the idealized one, with point symmetry mm2. Despite having different space groups, the structures of the α‐ and β‐polymorphs are very similar. The polymeric layers formed by the Cu atoms and the hypophosphite ions, which are identical in the α‐ and β‐polymorphs, stack in the third dimension in different ways. Each hypophosphite anion is coordinated to three Cu atoms. On cooling, a minimum amount of contraction was observed in the direction normal to the layers. The structure of the polymeric layers in the γ‐­polymorph is quite different. There are two symmetry‐independent hypophosphite anions; the first is coordinated to two Cu atoms, while the second is coordinated to four Cu atoms. In all three polymorphs, the Cu atoms are coordinated by six O atoms of six hypophosphite anions, forming tetragonal bipyramids; in the α‐ and β‐polymorphs, there are four short and two long Cu—O distances, while in the γ‐polymorph, there are four long and two short Cu—O distances.     

Synthesis and Structure of a 2, 8, 9‐Trioxa‐3, 5, 7‐trisila‐1‐titanaadamantane

The title compound has been prepared from [Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Cl₃] and cis‐cis‐(t‐BuSi(OH)—CH₂)₃ in hexane solution in the presence of Et₃N. The pale yellow complex was characterized by NMR and MS spectra, as well as by a crystal structure determination. The two crystallographic independent molecules in the triclinic unit cell (space group P1¯, No. 2, Z = 4) both have a nearly identical adamantane‐like TiO₃Si₃C₃ cage of approximate C_3v symmetry. The exocyclic C—C—C bond angles in the Cp‐ligand range from 123° to 129°. A quantum chemical calculation of the free molecule predicts this range to be 124° to 127°. The arrangement of the molecules in the crystal is characteristic for an offset face‐to‐face ππ stacking of the aromatic η⁵‐C₅Me₅ rings.     

α‐Tris(2,4‐pentanedionato‐κ2O,O′)cobalt(III) at 240, 210, 180, 150 and 110 K

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Co(C₅H₇O₂)₃], has been investigated by a multi‐temperature measurement. In contrast to the isomorphous Al compound, the title compound exists in the studied temperature range as its monoclinic α polymorph (space group P2₁/c) and does not undergo a phase transition. Rigid‐body TLS analyses have been performed and the anisotropic thermal expansion tensor α_ij has been determined. The cell axes show a linear expansion behavior with respect to the temperature, but the slope is significantly different. A possible explanation are the different strengths of different intermolecular C—H...O contacts, which run in different crystallographic directions.