Sorbent-based sampling methods for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in air: Part 1: Sorbent-based air monitoring options

Sorbent tubes/traps are widely used in combination with gas chromatographic (GC) analytical methods to monitor the vapour-phase fraction of organic compounds in air. Target compounds range in volatility from acetylene and freons to phthalates and PCBs and include apolar, polar and reactive species. Airborne vapour concentrations will vary depending on the nature of the location, nearby pollution sources, weather conditions, etc. Levels can range from low percent concentrations in stack and vent emissions to low part per trillion (ppt) levels in ultra-clean outdoor locations. Hundreds, even thousands of different compounds may be present in any given atmosphere. GC is commonly used in combination with mass spectrometry (MS) detection especially for environmental monitoring or for screening uncharacterised workplace atmospheres. Given the complexity and variability of organic vapours in air, no one sampling approach suits every monitoring scenario. A variety of different sampling strategies and sorbent media have been developed to address specific applications. Key sorbent-based examples include: active (pumped) sampling onto tubes packed with one or more sorbents held at ambient temperature; diffusive (passive) sampling onto sorbent tubes/cartridges; on-line sampling of air/gas streams into cooled sorbent traps; and transfer of air samples from containers (canisters, Tedlar^® bags, etc.) into cooled sorbent focusing traps. Whichever sampling approach is selected, subsequent analysis almost always involves either solvent extraction or thermal desorption (TD) prior to GC(/MS) analysis. The overall performance of the air monitoring method will depend heavily on appropriate selection of key sampling and analytical parameters. This comprehensive review of air monitoring using sorbent tubes/traps is divided into 2 parts. (1) Sorbent-based air sampling option. (2) Sorbent selection and other aspects of optimizing sorbent-based air monitoring methods. The paper presents current state-of-the-art and recent developments in relevant areas such as sorbent research, sampler design, enhanced approaches to analytical quality assurance and on-tube derivatisation.     

Novel sample preparation technique with needle-type micro-extraction device for volatile organic compounds in indoor air samples

A novel needle-type sample preparation device was developed for the effective preconcentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in indoor air before gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis. To develop a device for extracting a wide range of VOCs typically found in indoor air, several types of particulate sorbents were tested as the extraction medium in the needle-type extraction device. To determine the content of these VOCs, air samples were collected for 30 min with the packed sorbent(s) in the extraction needle, and the extracted VOCs were thermally desorbed in a GC injection port by the direct insertion of the needle. A double-bed sorbent consisting of a needle packed with divinylbenzene and activated carbon particles exhibited excellent extraction and desorption performance and adequate extraction capacity for all the investigated VOCs. The results also clearly demonstrated that the proposed sample preparation method is a more rapid, simpler extraction/desorption technique than traditional sample preparation methods.     

Comparative study of solvent extraction and thermal desorption methods for determining a wide range of volatile organic compounds in ambient air

This paper compares two analytical methods for determining levels of 90 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) commonly found in industrial and urban atmospheres. Both methods are based on two official methods for determining benzene levels and involve collecting samples by active adsorptive enrichment on solid sorbents. The first method involves solvent extraction and uses activated charcoal as a sorbent. After sampling, the sorbent is extracted with 1 mL of carbon disulfide and then 1 μL of the extract is analysed in a GC-MS. The second method involves thermal desorption (TD) and uses Tenax TA and Carbograph 1TD as sorbents, which allows the whole sample to be analysed. In general, the thermal desorption method showed the best repetitivity and recovery and the lowest limit of detection and quantification for all target compounds. Because of its lower sensitivity, the solvent extraction method needs the preconcentration of large sample volumes of air (720 L vs. 2.64 L for the thermal desorption method) to yield similar limits of detection.The performance of both methods in real samples was tested in a location near to a petrochemical complex. The results of the 24-h samples for the solvent extraction method were compared with the average of 12 2-h samples for the TD method. In some cases, both methods found differences in the VOC concentrations, especially in those compounds whose concentrations fluctuate significantly during the day.     

Determination of complex mixtures of volatile organic compounds in ambient air: an overview

This article reviews developments in the sampling and analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ambient air since the 1970s, particularly in the field of environmental monitoring. Global monitoring of biogenic and anthropogenic VOC emissions is briefly described. Approaches used for environmental monitoring of VOCs and industrial hygiene VOC exposure assessments are compared. The historical development of the sampling and analytical methods used is discussed, and the relative advantages and disadvantages of sorbent and canister methods are identified. Overall, there is considerable variability in the reliability of VOC estimates and inventories. In general, canister methods provide superior precision and accuracy and are particulary useful for the analysis of complex mixtures of VOCs. Details of canister methods are reviewed in a companion paper. C. C. Austin is an Invited Scientist of the National Research Council of Canada.     

Development of a sensitive thermal desorption method for the determination of trihalomethanes in humid ambient and alveolar air

A sensitive and reliable method has been developed for the determination of trihalomethanes (THMs) in air samples through adsorption in sorbent tubes and thermal desorption (TD) of the compounds, followed by gas chromatography (GC)–mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. Three commercial sorbent materials were compared in terms of adsorption efficiency and breakthrough volume, finding Chromosorb 102 to be the most appropriate adsorbent for air sampling. The method allows us to reach detection limits of 0.03 ng (0.01 μg m⁻³ for 3 l of air), linear ranges from 0.1 to 2000 ng and specific uncertainties of ca. 5.0 ± 0.2 ng for all THMs. Several salts were tested to reduce water retention (from the humid air of an indoor swimming pool) at the sampling stage, Na₂SO₄ being the one that provides optimum efficiency. The method was validated by a new recovery study in which several tubes with and without adsorbent were spiked with THMs and analyzed by TD-GC/MS, recoveries ranging from 92% to 97% for all the compounds. Finally, the performance of the method was evaluated through the analysis of ambient air samples from an indoor swimming pool and alveolar air samples from swimmers to assess their THM uptake. THMs were found to be stable in the sorbent tubes for at least 1 month when stored at 4 °C.     

Determination of diphenylamine in contaminated air of agricultural buildings using active sampling on solid sorbents

This paper reports the results of a study carried out with solid sorbents in order to establish the optimum procedure for sampling and determination of diphenylamine (DPA), the most widely used post-harvest chemical in apples, in the indoor air of apple storage buildings. Different sorbents (Amberlite XAD-2, Amberlite XAD-4, Supelpak 2, Florisil, and the octadecyl silica bonded sorbent, C-18) were evaluated for their capacity to efficiently retain DPA under different air sampling and storage conditions, whereas a desorption study of all sorbents tested was also performed to optimise a simple extraction procedure using low volumes of organic solvents. In general all sorbents produced acceptable results for DPA air sampling whereas DPA was recovered easily by the use of low volumes of both ethyl acetate and acetone from all sorbents studied thus making DPA a suitable analyte to be used in methods of indoor air analysis for multi-organic pollutants. However, the best results (analytical features, recovery results, and stability results during storage) were obtained by the use of Supelpak 2 as a sorbent for DPA active sampling. Limits of Quantification (LOQs) for the GC-NPD system ranged from 1.0 to 2.0?µg?m^?3 for 120 and 60?L air sampled, respectively. The developed air sampling procedure and analytical methodology was applied with success in the field to measure DPA residues in indoor air of two apple storage plants in Greece and results were further used to calculate the occupational inhalation exposure to DPA and consequently risk characterisation. Since DPA was detected in indoor air (at concentrations ranged from 1.6 to 580?µg?m^?3), there is no zero occupational risk for workers. However, the inhalation exposure of workers to DPA estimated in this study is far below the Acceptable Operator Exposure Level recently reviewed by the European Union and far below the critical exposure level for haematotoxicity systemic effect observed in carcinogenicity studies in rats for long-term inhalation exposure to DPA.     

Comparison of sampling efficiency and storage stability on different sorbents for determination of solvents in occupational air

This study describes the sampling efficiency and storage stability of compounds typically present in occupational atmospheres on the sorbents Anasorb CSC, Anasorb 747, and Chromosorb 106. The selection of compounds included in the study contained aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, esters, glycol ethers, ketones, and halogenated compounds, thus representing a wide range of chemical and physical properties. The different sorbent tubes were simultaneously exposed to the selected compounds as three different mixtures of solvent vapours in air, and storage both at room temperature and at -22 degrees C was investigated. The sorbent tubes were stored and analyzed at two different laboratories. The sampling efficiencies of all the investigated compounds were excellent on Anasorb CSC and Anasorb 747, while Chromosorb 106 did not give such good results for the most volatile compounds under study. The room temperature storage stability on Chromosorb 106, however, was good for all compounds, although formation of artefacts was observed during storage, a disadvantage that was substantially reduced by storage at -22 degrees C. The room temperature storage stability on Anasorb CSC was good for all compounds except some of the ketones. The room temperature storage stability of these ketones, especially cyclohexanone and 2-butanone, was much better on Anasorb 747, which still showed the same excellent storage stability for the remaining compounds. When stored in a freezer, the storage stability of all compounds, including the ketones, was very good on all sorbents. Among the sorbents under study, Anasorb 747 appears to be the most suitable all-round sorbent for monitoring volatile compounds in occupational air, with satisfactory capabilities regarding both sampling efficiency and storage stability.     

Determination of volatile organic compounds in ambient air. Comparison of methods

Two analytical methods for the determination of benzene vapour in ambient air are compared in this paper. The methods differ from each other in the sampling technique, type of sorbent, method of extraction and method of detection. The investigation of the methods using various techniques for sample analysing showed a significant influence of the way in which the analysis is carried out, on the final result of the analysis. Calculation of the standard deviations, relative standard deviations and confidence intervals allowed for assessment of the precision and repeatability of the methods. Of the two examined methods, that using an automated system of contaminant sampling and thermodesorption was more precise. This method has been applied to measurements of concentrations of benzene, toluene and xylenes in ambient air.     

Sampling and analysis of pesticides in ambient air

Developments in the sampling and determination of pesticides in ambient air have been discussed and data on the occurrence of pesticides in atmosphere have been presented. Developments in active sampling methods were reviewed and the different materials used for trapping pesticides from gas and particulate phases were discussed. Likewise, the use and developments of passive air samplers were reviewed. This article pays special attention to the analysis of pesticides trapped from ambient air, and recapitulate the procedures for extraction, clean-up and determination of these substances. Improvements in sampling procedures, analytical methods and monitoring activities are necessary to advance the knowledge of occurrence of currently used pesticides in atmosphere and their impact over environment and humans.     

Optimisation of sorbent trapping and thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometric conditions for sampling and analysis of hydrogen cyanide in air

Among the chemicals belonging to the schedules of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), sampling and analysis of highly volatile compounds such as hydrogen cyanide (HCN) require special consideration. The latter is present in numerous old chemical weapons that are stockpiled awaiting destruction in Northeastern France: thus, sampling on stockpile area and subsequent verification of HCN levels is compulsory to ensure safety of workers on these areas. The ability of several commercial sorbents to trap hydrogen cyanide at various concentration levels and in various humidity conditions, was evaluated. Furthermore, thermal desorption of the corresponding samples, followed by analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was also optimised. Carbosieve S-III, a molecular sieve possessing a very high specific area, proved the most efficient sorbent for HCN sampling in all conditions tested. Conversely, the presented results show that Tenax, albeit generally considered as the reference sorbent for air monitoring and analysis of CWC-related chemicals, is not suitable for HCN trapping.     

Screening method for pesticides in air by gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

A multiresidue method for determining more than 70 pesticides in air has been validated using a single injection with gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS). The method validation considered both stages of sampling and analysis. The sampling method, based on active sampling using sorption in sorbent cartidges, was validated by generating standard atmospheres. Performance parameters of the method were evaluated, with a reduction in the limits of quantification by injecting a higher volume of sample extract, and increase of selectivity by the use of MS/MS detection mode. The method was based on solid-phase extraction, which permits a degree of automation. The best adsorbents were found to be Chromosorb 106 and Tenax TA. The retention capacity of these sampling sorbents allows up to 1440 L of air to be sampled without any breakthrough for most of the compounds. Data were generated for assessing the potential exposure of bystanders. The application of the method to the analysis of the air in urban locations near agricultural areas showed that pesticides were present in most of the samples.     

Determination of hexahydrophthalic anhydride in air using gas chromatography.

Two methods for the determination of hexahydrophthalic anhydride (HHPA) in air were developed. In a solid sorbent method, HHPA was sampled in Amberlite XAD-2 tubes, eluted in toluene and analysed by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. The sampling rates were 0.2 and 1.0 l/min. At 15 micrograms/m3 (relative humidity less than 2%) and 27 micrograms/m3 (relative humidity 70%) no breakthrough was observed. However, at 160 micrograms/m3 (relative humidity less than 2%), 6% breakthrough was found. The sampling efficiency of the sampling rates 0.2 and 1.0 l/min did not differ. In a bubbler method, HHPA was sampled in bubblers filled with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution. The sodium salt of hexahydrophthalic acid was formed. No breakthrough was observed using a sampling rate of 1.0 l/min. The samples were stable during storage for eight weeks in a refrigerator. The HHP acid was esterified with methanol-boron trifluoride and analysed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. Apparatus for the generation of standard atmospheres of HHPA, in the range of 10-3000 micrograms/m3, was developed using the diffusion principle. For the solid sorbent method the precision (coefficient of variation) of the overall method was 2-7%, and for the bubbler method 3-19% (range 15-160 micrograms HHPA/m3; relative humidity = less than 2-70%). A comparison between the two methods was performed using the standard atmosphere. The concentrations found by the solid sorbent method were 86-98% of those found by the bubbler method (range 15-160 micrograms HHPA per m3; relative humidity = less than 2-70%). In work environment air, 93% was found using the solid sorbent method relative to the bubbler method at a mean concentration of 330 micrograms/m3 (coefficient of variation = 39%; range 200-540 micrograms/m3). For both methods, concentrations greater than 3 micrograms/m3 could be quantified at 60 min sampling with a sampling rate of 1.0 l/min.     

Thick film traps with an irregular film. Preparation and evaluation

A new method for preparation of sorbent-based ultra-thick film traps for concentration of trace volatile components from gaseous matrices is described. The procedure is based on blowing a prepolymer (polydimethylsiloxane) through a capillary tube, forming an irregular film of stationary phase. Subsequently, the prepolymer is immobilized in a few seconds by heating to 200 degrees C. Evaluation of the performance of the new traps showed that the loss of efficiency, compared to regular smooth film traps is only on the order of 20-30%. In terms of breakthrough volume, this loss in performance is rather insignificant. The technology is extremely simple and allows a rapid and cheap production of a large number of ultra-thick film traps, even in non-specialized laboratories. The method can be applied to any type of cross-linkable stationary phase, thereby expanding the scope of sorbent-based trapping and preconcentration concept. Many applications are anticipated in trace and ultra-trace analysis in a wide range of fields, such as environmental chemistry, polymers, food and process analysis.     

On-site environmental analysis by membrane extraction with a sorbent interface combined with a portable gas chromatograph system

A novel device, membrane extraction with a sorbent interface (MESI) coupled with a portable gas chromatograph (GC) system, has been developed. The main components of this system include a membrane module, a microtrap, and a control unit for the heater and cooler. The membrane module, as an on-line sample-introduction device for this system, can be manipulated in different configurations, allowing for the selective permeation of analytes across the membrane into the carrier/stripping gas. The analytes are trapped and concentrated onto a microtrap, which serves as an injector for gas chromatography separation. A concentration pulse of the trapped analytes is generated through direct electrical heating of the microtrap. The characteristics of this system have been explored, and its applicability and effectiveness have been demonstrated in field monitoring applications including the analysis of toluene in wastewater, Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in laboratory air, and chloroform in swimming-pool water. This system is very promising, as it is a simple, fast, and portable tool for on-site process environmental monitoring.     

23种挥发性有机化合物在3种吸附剂上漏出容量的测定评价

采用吸附热解吸－气相色谱－质谱法对23种挥发性有机化合物Chromosorb 106、Tenax TA、Tenax TG等3种吸附剂上漏出容量进行了测定。根据实验结果确定了不同的化合物应选择不同的吸附剂及相应的采样体积。结果表明,Chromosorb 106可较好地吸附低沸点的挥发性有机化合物,Tenax TA、Tenax TG均可用于沸点较高的挥发笥有机化合物吸附,这对测定大气中的有机化合物含量采样有一定的参考价值。     

Analytical methods for detection of nonoccupational exposure to pesticides

An analytical protocol is developed to analyze for 33 compounds in ambient air around the household, drinking water, and from dermal contact while applying pesticides. Soxhlet extraction is used on both the polyurethane foam plugs, which were used as air sample trapping media, and the gloves reflecting dermal contact. The extraction procedure of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 608 is used for water samples. A stringent gas chromatography/electron capture detection (GC/ECD) and gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy/multiple ion detection (GC/MS/MID) analytical approach parallel to the procedures of the current EPA contract laboratory program is used for analysis.     

Chelating sorbents based on silica gel and their application in atomic spectrometry

This mini-review covers chelating sorbents anchored to silica gel and their analytical applications for the preconcentration, separation and determination of trace metal ions, focussing mainly on the last 20 years. The article summarizes also the experience gathered by our research group in the synthesis and characterization of new modified silica gels via silanization, and their affinity toward selective extraction and separation of trace elements. The introduction of 1,5-bis(di-2-pyridyl)methylene thiocarbohydrazide silica gel (DPTH-gel) and methylthiosalicylate silica gel (TS-gel) chelating sorbents in trace and ultratrace analysis provide vital breakthroughs in preconcentration methods. These home-made materials allow certain analytes to be selectively extracted from complex matrices without matrix interference and good detection limits. The advantages of these new chelating sorbents in comparison with 8-hydroxyquinoline chelating sorbent immobilized on silica gel are discussed.     

六氯丁二烯分析方法研究进展

六氯丁二烯是一种持久性有机污染物,于2015年和2017年分别被列入《斯德哥尔摩公约》附件A和附件C的受控污染物名单中。六氯丁二烯的来源、环境赋存和影响等研究对控制该新增受控持久性有机污染物污染具有重要意义,而灵敏可靠的六氯丁二烯分析方法是开展相关研究的前提和基础。近年来已有不少学者将六氯丁二烯作为分析目标物之一进行了检测或方法学研究。基于这些研究成果,该文综述了六氯丁二烯分析方法的研究进展,其中重点介绍了空气、水体、土壤、污泥、生物组织等多种介质中六氯丁二烯的样品前处理方法,并比较了各方法的优缺点,以期为该领域的进一步研究提供参考。空气中六氯丁二烯主要由泵抽气通过吸附管而采集,再经热脱附后进行仪器分析,检出限在ng/m³水平。也有研究应用聚氨酯泡沫被动采样器和吸附剂填充聚氨酯泡沫被动采样器采集大气中六氯丁二烯及其他污染物。基于吸附剂填充聚氨酯泡沫被动采样器的分析方法灵敏度较高,其对六氯丁二烯的检出限低至0.03 pg/m³。然而目前被动采样体积仅根据六氯丁二烯的log K_OA系数估算,未来仍需进一步实验校正。水体样品前处理通常也较简单,通过吹扫捕集、液-液萃取或固相萃取目标物后进行仪器分析。固相萃取法能够同步实现目标物的提取、净化和浓缩,在水样中六氯丁二烯分析方面具有明显优势。固相萃取柱类型以及干燥步骤中柱中残留水分去除率均会影响六氯丁二烯的回收率。灰尘、土壤、沉积物、污泥和生物组织等固体介质样品基质最为复杂,需联合多种方法进行前处理。固体样品中六氯丁二烯提取方法包括索氏提取,加速溶剂萃取和超声萃取,其中超声萃取法应用最为广泛。固体基质净化方面主要采用层析柱色谱法,多根净化柱联用或多层复合柱能够提升净化效果。仪器分析方面,六氯丁二烯主要采用气相色谱和质谱联用检测,高性能质谱检测器如串联质谱能够大大提高六氯丁二烯的检测灵敏度,具有较大的应用潜力。     

Carbon nanotubes as the sorbent for integrating μ-solid phase extraction within the needle of a syringe

In this research we report the implementation of micro-solid-phase extraction (μ-SPE) in the needle of a syringe for integrating sampling, analyte enrichment and sample introduction into a single device. Both single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were explored as high performance sorbents for μ-SPE in packed and self assembled formats. The need for such a sorbent was critical because the needle probe could hold only a small amount of material (around 300 μg). Conventional C-18 and self-assembled CNTs were found to be ineffective with enrichment factors less than one. However, packed beds of CNTs were found to be excellent sorbent phases, where high extraction efficiencies (as high as 27%) as well as enrichment factors (close to 7) could be achieved. The overall method showed excellent linearity, reproducibility, and low method detection limit (0.1–3 ng/mL for MWNTs). The sorption on CNTs followed Freundlich isotherms, and the functionalized CNTs were more effective for enriching the polar compounds.     

Exposure to airborne formaldehyde: Sampling and analytical methods—A review

Air monitoring is the quantitative-qualitative assessment of the extent of pollutants. It is performed to ensure compliance with legislation and to evaluate control measures and mitigation solutions. There are numerous approaches to measure airborne formaldehyde (FA), ranging from passive sampling techniques to remote sensing devices. Research of sampling procedures and analytical methods was performed in a scientific database and on the web to offer a scenario of the devices and techniques that can be used to assess FA exposure. Moreover, in the design of FA assessment, some crucial aspects were considered, such as standard atmosphere generation for devices calibration. This review summarizes the tools and basics used in FA air monitoring, useful to organize a functional monitoring strategy for assessment of FA concentration levels. An insight into the sampling and analysis of FA is provided. Recent advances in solid sorbent technology allow analysts to use these devices coupled to chromatographic instruments. A comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of analytical methods (gas-/liquid-chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry or UV detection, chromogenic, colorimetric, electrochemical determination) and sampling devices (impregnated papers, solid sorbents, liquid sorbents, bubblers, impingers, micro-impingers, denuder samplers, sealed bags, canisters) methods are illustrated. This survey found that a monitoring strategy should be planned considering the most appropriate methodology in terms of costs and practicability. Therefore, it is necessary to know the aspects that can make the chosen strategy suitable and valid for the exposure scenario under investigation.