Recent Chemistry Based on the [RuCp(CH3CN)3]+ Cation: Reappraisalof an Old Precursor

 This article gives an overview of recent chemistry based on the tris-acetonitrile complex [RuCp(CH₃CN)₃]⁺. Due to the labile nature of the CH₃CN ligands, substitution reactions are a dominant feature of this complex. Important derivatives are the highly reactive complexes [RuCp(PR ₃)(CH₃CN)₂]⁺ which are a source of the 14e⁻ fragment [RuCp(PR ₃)]⁺. These species are catalytically active in the redox isomerization of allyl alcohols to give aldehydes and ketones. Furthermore, the cationic complex [RuCp(κ¹(P),η²-PPh₂CH₂CH₂CH*CH₂)(CH₃CN)]PF₆ derived from the reaction of [RuCp(CH₃CN)₃]⁺ with PPh₂CH₂CH₂CH*CH₂ is a model compound for studying coupling reactions of olefins and acetylenes. In addition, [RuCp(CH₃CN)₃]⁺ is a valuable precursor for the synthesis of configurationally stable chiral three-legged piano-stool ruthenium complexes. These are currently being intensively investigated as Lewis acid catalysts in asymmetric synthesis.     

Electrochemical behaviour of [Ru(L)(CO)2Cl2] [Ru(L)(CO)Cl3][Me4N] and [Ru(L)(CO)2(CH3CN)2][CF3SO3]2 complexes (L = 2,2′- bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine)

The clectrochemical behaviour of the complexes [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂], [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ (L = 2,2′-bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine) has been investigated in CH₃CN. The oxidation of [Ru(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] produces new complexes [Ru^III(L)(CO)(CH₃CN)₂Cl]²⁺ as a consequence of the instability of the electrogenerated transient Ru^III species [Ru^III(L)(CO)₂Cl₂]⁺. In contrast, the oxidation of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] produces the stable [Ru^III(L)(CO)Cl₃] complex. In contrast [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ is not oxidized in the range up to the most positive potentials achievable. The reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ results in the formation of identical dark blue strongly adherent electroactive films. These films exhibit the characteristics of a metal-metal bond dimer structure. No films are obtained on reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N]. The effect of the substitution of the bipyridine ligand by electron-withdrawing carboxy ester groups on the electrochemical behaviour of all these complexes has also been investigated.     

Recent Chemistry Based on the [RuCp(CH3CN)3]+ Cation: Reappraisalof an Old Precursor

Summary.  This article gives an overview of recent chemistry based on the tris-acetonitrile complex [RuCp(CH₃CN)₃]⁺. Due to the labile nature of the CH₃CN ligands, substitution reactions are a dominant feature of this complex. Important derivatives are the highly reactive complexes [RuCp(PR ₃)(CH₃CN)₂]⁺ which are a source of the 14e⁻ fragment [RuCp(PR ₃)]⁺. These species are catalytically active in the redox isomerization of allyl alcohols to give aldehydes and ketones. Furthermore, the cationic complex [RuCp(κ¹(P),η²-PPh₂CH₂CH₂CH*CH₂)(CH₃CN)]PF₆ derived from the reaction of [RuCp(CH₃CN)₃]⁺ with PPh₂CH₂CH₂CH*CH₂ is a model compound for studying coupling reactions of olefins and acetylenes. In addition, [RuCp(CH₃CN)₃]⁺ is a valuable precursor for the synthesis of configurationally stable chiral three-legged piano-stool ruthenium complexes. These are currently being intensively investigated as Lewis acid catalysts in asymmetric synthesis. Received May 31, 2000. Accepted June 13, 2000     

A cyclometallated iridium(III) dimethylphenylphosphine complex

[Ir(cod)Cl]₂ (cod = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) reacts with PMe₂Ph in CH₃CN to give the red cation [Ir(PMe₂Ph)₄]⁺. This complex in CH₃CN reacts with H₂ to give cis-[IrH₂(PMe₂Ph)₄]⁺, but on reflux for 6 h in the absence of H₂, it gives the first example of a cyclometallated PMe₂Ph complex fac-[IrH(PMe₂C₆H₄)(PMe₂Ph)₃]⁺, as shown by PMR spectroscopy and preliminary X-ray crystallographic data.     

The preparation and molecular structure oftrans-[MoCl2(PMe2Ph)4]

Summary The compoundtrans-[MoCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₄] has been prepared by the reduction of MoCl₅ (by Mg) or of [MoCl₃(PMe₂Ph)₃] (by LiBuⁿ) in the presence of PMe₂Ph in tetrahydrofuran (THF). It has _eff=2.84 B.M. and crystallises in space group P1 witha=11.591(3),b=12.931(3),c=12.703(3) Å, = 95.28(2), =105.97(2), =103.54(2)°. Refinement of the structure gave R=0.036. The Mo-Cl and Mo-P distances average 2.443(6) and 2.534(8) Å, respectively.Low-valent phosphine complexes of the Group VI metals continue to attract much attention because of their involvement in studies of the catalytic activation of dinitrogen⁽¹⁾, dihydrogen(^{2, 3}), alkenes and alkynes(⁴). As a by-product during our studies of dinitrogen(¹) and hydride(²) complexes of molybdenum and tungsten, we obtainedtrans-[MoCl_2- (PMe₂Ph)₄] as yellow, paramagnetic crystals (_eff= 2.84 B.M.). We first obtained the compound during the attempted synthesis ofcis-[Mo(N₂)₂(PMe₂Ph)₄] by reduction of MoCl₅ with Mg in the presence of PMe₂Ph (see Experimental). Upon identification of the compound we found that it could be readily synthesised by treatment of [MoCl₃(PMe₂Ph)₃]⁽⁵⁾ with LiBuⁿ in THF in the presence of PMe₂Ph (experimental).The complex was shown to have thetrans structure by x-ray analysis (Figure). Analogues oftrans-[MoCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₄] have been prepared, namely [CrCl₂(Me₂PCH₂CH₂PMe₂)₂]⁽⁶⁾,trans- [MoCl₂(PMe₃)₄]⁽⁷⁾, [WCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₄]⁽⁸⁾ and [WCl₂(PMe₃)₄]⁽⁴⁾, of which onlytrans-[MoCl₂(PMe₃)₄] has been examined by X-rays⁽⁷⁾. Its principal structural parametersi.e. d(Mo-Cl)= 2.420(6), d(Mo-P)_av=2.496(3) Å⁽⁶⁾ are close to those found here fortrans-[MoCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₄].     

Some trimethyl phosphine and trimethyl phosphite complexes of tungsten(IV)

Direct reduction of WCl₆ with PMe₃ in toluene at 120°C in a sealed tube affords the complexes [WCl₄(PMe₃)_x] (x = 2, 3). [WCl₄(PMe₃)₃] abstracts oxygen from equimolar amounts of water in wet acetone or tetrahydrofuran to give [WOCl₂(PMe₃)₃] in very high yields. This procedure has been successfully applied to the high yield synthesis of other known oxotungsten(IV) complexes, [WOCl₂(PR₃)₃] (PR₃ = PMe₂Ph and PMePh₂). Metathesis reactions of [WOCl₂(PMe₃)₃] with NaX give [WOX₂(PMe₃)₃] (X = NCO, NCS) and [WOX₂(PMe₃)] (X = Me₂NCS₂). The synthesis of the trimethylphosphite analogue, [WOCl₂(P(OMe)₃)₃], is also described and the structures of the new complexes assigned on the basis of IR and ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy.     

Ruthenium(II/III)‐Based Compounds with Encouraging Antiproliferative Activity against Non‐small‐Cell Lung Cancer

Hereby we present the synthesis of several ruthenium(II) and ruthenium(III) dithiocarbamato complexes. Proceeding from the Na[trans‐Ru^III(dmso)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ) and cis‐[Ru^II(dmso)₄Cl₂] ( 3 ) precursors, the diamagnetic, mixed‐ligand [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes 4 and 5 , the paramagnetic, neutral [Ru^IIIL₃] monomers 6 and 7 , the antiferromagnetically coupled ionic α‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl complexes 8 and 9 as well as the β‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl dinuclear species 10 and 11 (L=dimethyl‐ (DMDT) and pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDT)) were obtained. All the compounds were fully characterised by elemental analysis as well as ¹H NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, for the first time the crystal structures of the dinuclear β‐[Ru^III₂(dmdt)₅]BF₄ ? CHCl₃ ? CH₃CN and of the novel [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes were also determined and discussed. For both the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^II and Ru^III complexes the central metal atoms assume a distorted octahedral geometry. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes has been evaluated on non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) NCI‐H1975 cells. All the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^III dithiocarbamato compounds (i.e., complexes 6 – 10 ) show interesting cytotoxic activity, up to one order of magnitude higher with respect to cisplatin. Otherwise, no significant antiproliferative effect for either the precursors 2 and 3 or the Ru^II complexes 4 and 5 has been observed.     

Chemistry of ruthenium in N2P2X2 (X = Cl, Br) coordination sphere: Synthesis, characterization and reactivities

Reaction of 2-(phenylazo)pyridine (pap) with [Ru(PPh₃)₃X₂] (X = Cl, Br) in dichloromethane solution affords [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)X₂]. These diamagnetic complexes exhibit a weakdd transition and two intense MLCT transitions in the visible region. In dichloromethane solution they display a one-electron reduction of pap near − 0.90 V vs SCE and a reversible ruthenium(II)-ruthenium(III) oxidation near 0.70 V vs SCE. The [Ru^III(PPh₃)₂(pap)Cl₂]⁺ complex cation, generated by coulometric oxidation of [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)Cl₂], shows two intense LMCT transitions in the visible region. It oxidizes N,N-dimethylaniline and [Ru^II(bpy)₂Cl₂] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) to produce N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylbenzidine and [Ru^III(bpy)₂Cl₂]⁺ respectively. Reaction of [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)X₂] with Ag⁺ in ethanol produces [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)(EtOH)₂]²⁺ which upon further reaction with L (L = pap, bpy, acetylacetonate ion(acac⁻) and oxalate ion (ox²⁻)) gives complexes of type [Ru(PPh₃)₂(pap)(L)]ⁿ⁺ (n = 0, 1, 2). All these diamagnetic complexes show a weakdd transition and several intense MLCT transitions in the visible region. The ruthenium(II)-ruthenium(III) oxidation potential decreases in the order (of L): pap > bpy > acac⁻ > ox²⁻. Reductions of the coordinated pap and bpy are also observed.     

Electrochemical studies on neutral triple-bridged di-ruthenium compounds.

Voltammetric studies reveal that, like [Ru₂Cl₄(PPh₃)₄(CO)], triply-bridged complexes [Ru₂Cl₄L₅] (L = PClPh₂, PMePh₂, PEt₂Ph) are reversibly oxidized to [Ru₂Cl₄L₅]⁺. The mixed valence complexes [Ru₂Cl₅L₃Y] (L = PPh₃, P(tol)₃; Y = CO, CS) undergo a corresponding reduction to [Ru₂Cl₅L₃Y]^?; whereas [Ru₂Cl₅L₄] (L = PEt₂Ph, As(tol)₃) and [Ru₂Cl₆(AsPh₃)₃] are both reduced $\text{and}$ oxidised in reversible one-electron steps. For the bridging (RuCl₃Ru)^z+ moiety, the redox series z = 1, 2, 3, 4 is established.     

Basische metalle: LIII. Ruthenium- und osmium-komplexe mit dem dimethylphosphinomethanid-anion als liganden

The reduction of trans-RuCl₂(PMe₃)₄ with Na/Hg and of trans-OsCl₂(PMe₃)₄ with sodium in the presence of catalytic amounts of naphthalene gives the complexes RuH(η²-CH₂PMe₂)(PMe₃)₃ (III) and OsH(η²-CH₂PMe₂PMe₂), (IV) in good yields. An equilibrium with the metal(0) isomers [M(PMe₃)₄] cannot be detected by NMR spectroscopy. III and IV react with dihalomethanes CH₂X₂ (X = Cl, Br, I) and CH₃I to form mixtures of the dimethylphosphinomethanide complexes MX(η²-CH₂PMe₂)(PMe₃)₃ and the compounds MX₂(PMe₃)₄. The reactions of III and IV with the Brönsted acids HCl, HBr, CF₃CO₂H and HC₂Ph lead (with exception of M = Ru and X = C₂Ph) to the complexes cis-MX₂(PMe₃)₄. The hydrolysis of IV gives the hydrido(hydroxy) compound cis-OsH(OH)(PMe₃)₄, which has been characterized by ¹H, ³¹P NMR and mass spectroscopy. The synthesis of the complex cis-Os(CH₃)₂(PMe₃)₄ is also described; the conversion into the ethylene(hydrido)metal cation [OsH(C₂H₄)(PMe₃)₄]⁺ failed.     

The use of ferrocene in organometallic synthesis: A two-step preparation of cyclopentadienyliron acetonitrile and phosphine cations via photolysis of cyclopentadienyliron tricarbonyl or arene cations

UV photolysis of [CpFe^II(CO)₃]⁺ PF6₆^? (I) or [CpFe^II(η⁶-toluene)]⁺ PF₆^?? (II) in CH₃CN in the presence of 1 mole of a ligand L gives the new air sensitive, red complexes [CpFe^II(NCCH₃)₂L]⁺PF₆^? (III, L = PPh₃; IV; L = CO; VIII, L = cyclohexene; IX, L = dimethylthiophene) and the known air stable complex [CpFe^II(PMe₃)₂(NCMe)]⁺ PF₆^? (V). The last product is also obtained by photolysis in the presence of 2 or 3 moles of PMe₃. In the presence of dppe, the known complex [CpFe^II (dppe)(NCCH₃)]⁺ (XI) is obtained. Complex III reacts with CO under mild conditions to give the known complex [CpFe(NCCH₃)(PPh₃)CO]⁺ PF₆^? (X). UV photolysis of I in CH₃CN in the presence of 1-phenyl-3,4-dimethylphosphole (P) gives [CpFe^IIP₃]⁺ PF₆^? (XII); UV photolysis of II in CH₂Cl₂ in the presence of 3 moles of PMe₃ or I mole of tripod (CH₃C(CH₂Ph₂)₃) provides an easy synthesis of the known complexes [CpFe^II(PMe₃)₃]⁺ PF₆^? (VII) or [CpFe^IIη³-tripod]⁺ PF₆^t- (XIII). Since I and II are easily accessible from ferrocene, these photolytic syntheses provide access to a wide range of piano-stool cyclopentadienyliron(II) cations in a 2-step process from ferrocene.     

A SIMPLE ROUTE FOR SYNTHESES OF TRIHALIDE-BRIDGED CARBONYL DIRUTHENIUM(II,III) COMPLEXES: CRYSTAL AND MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF ttt-[RuIICl2(CO)2(PPh3)2],[(CO)(AsPh3)2RuII(μ-Cl3)RuIIICl2(AsPh3)] AND ([CO)(PPh3)2RuII(μ-Br3)RuIIIBr2(PPh3)], SPECTROSCOPIES,ELECTROCHEMISTRY AND PROPERTIES

Abstract

The triply halide-bridged binuclear complexes [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(AsPh₃)₃] (AsPh₃ = triphenylarsine), [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(PPh₃)₂(AsPh₃)] (PPh₃ = triphenylphosphine), [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(AsPh₃)₂(PPh₃)], [Ru₂ Br₅(CO)(PPh₃)₃], [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(P{p-tol}₃)₂(PPh₃)] (P{p-tol}₃ = tri-p-tolylphosphine) and [Ru₂ Br₂Cl₃(PPh₃)₂(AsPh₃)] were prepared from the precursor compounds ttt-[RuX₂(CO)₂(P)₂] (X = Cl or Br) and [RuY₃(P')₂S]·S (Y = Cl or Br; P=PPh₃, AsPh₃ or P{p- tol}₃ and P' = AsPh₃ or PPh₃; S=DMA or MeOH, where DMA = N,N'-dimethylacetamide). The molecular structures of the binuclear complexes [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(AsPh₃)₃] (P2_1/c), [Ru₂Br₅(CO)(PPh₃)₃] (P2_1/c) and ttt-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] (P1) were determined by X-ray diffraction methods. The complexes are always formed by two Ru atoms bridged through three halide anions, two of which are × type (from the Ru^II precursor) and the other is Y type (from the ruthenium^III precursor) confirming our previously suggested mechanism for obtaining this class of complexes. The Ru^II atom is also coordinated to a carbon monoxide molecule and two P ligands from the ttt-starting isomer whereas the Ru^III atom is bonded to two non-bridging Y halides and one P' molecule. The presence of Ru^III was confirmed by EPR data, a technique that was also useful to suggest the symmetry of the complexes. The absence of intervalence charge-transfer transitions (IT) in the near infrared spectrum confirms that the binuclear complexes have localized valence. The IR spectra of the complexes show; (CO) bands close to 1970 cm^?1 and ν(Ru-Cl) or(Ru-Br) bands at about 230–380 cm^?1 corresponding to halides at terminal or bridged positions. Two widely separated redox processes, Ru^II/Ru^II←Ru^II/Ru^III→Ru^III/Ru^III, were observed by cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry.     

NEW DINUCLEAR ASYMMETRIC COMPLEXES OF RUTHENIUM AND RHENIUM

Abstract

New dinuclear asymmetric complexes of ruthenium and rhenium, of formula [(bpy)(CO)₃ Re^I(4,4′-bpy)Ru^II/III(NH₃)₅]^3+/4+ have been prepared and characterized by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques. In the mixed-valent species [Re^I, Ru^III], the back electron transfer reaction Ru^II → Re^II, that occurs after light excitation, is predicted to be in the Marcus inverted region. This fact is consistent with the observed quenching of the luminiscence of the Re chromophore in [(bpy)(CO)₃Re^I(4,4′-bpy)Ru^III(NH₃)₅]⁴⁺, when compared to the parent complex [(bpy)(CO)₃Re^I(4,4′-bpy)]⁺. A theoretical treatment due to Creutz, Newton and Sutin has been successfully applied to predict the electronic coupling element in the mixed-valent complex.     

Basische metalle : XXXVII. Zur reaktivität der ethylen(hydrido)rhodium-komplexe [C5H5RhH(C2H4)PR3]X gegenüber nucleophilen: insertion versus substitution

The complex [C₅H₅RhH(C₂H₄)PMe₃]BF₄ (I) reacts with NaF and NaCN by deprotonation to give C₅H₅Rh(PMe₃)C₂H₄ but with NaCl, NaBr and NaI the ethylrhodium compounds C₅H₅RhC₂H₅(PMe₃)X (II–IV) are obtained. The reactions of I with CO and PPrⁱ₃ yield the BF₄ salts of the cations [C₅H₅RhH(CO)PMe₃]⁺ and [C₅H₅RhH(PPrⁱ₃)PMe₃]⁺ (V, VI), respectively, from which the uncharged complexes C₅H₅Rh(CO)PMe₃ (VII) and C₅H₅Rh(PPRⁱ₃)PMe₃ (VIII) are prepared. The carbonyl compound VII is also accessible either from C₅H₅Rh(CO)₂ and PMe₃ or from C₅H₅Rh(PMe₃)₂ and CO. The reaction of I with ethylene leads to the BF₄ salt of the cation [C₅H₅RhC₂H₅(PMe₃)C₂H₄]⁺ (X) which on treatment with PMe₃ forms the complex [C₅H₅RhC₂H₅(PMe₃)C₂H₄PMe₃]BF₄ (XI). The compound [C₅H₅RhH(C₂H₄)PPrⁱ₃]BF₄ (XII) reacts with NaI by insertion to yield C₅H₅RhC₂H₅(PPrⁱ₃)I (XIII) whereas with PPrⁱ₃ the salt [C₅H₅RhH(PPrⁱ₃)₂]BF₄ (XIV) is produced. The bis(triisopropylphosphine) complex C₅H₅Rh(PPrⁱ₃)₂ (XVI) is obtained from XIV and NaH.     

Synthesis and spectral studies on heterobimetallic complexes of manganese and ruthenium derived from N-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylenebenzoylhydrazide

The complex [Mn^IV(napbh)₂] (napbhH₂ = N-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylenebenzoylhydrazide) reacts with activated ruthenium(III) chloride in methanol in 1 : 1.2 molar ratio under reflux, giving heterobimetallic complexes, [Mn^IV(napbh)₂Ru^IIICl₃(H₂O)] · [Ru^III(napbhH)Cl₂(H₂O)] reacts with Mn(OAc)₂·4H₂O in methanol in 1 : 1.2 molar ratio under reflux to give [Ru^III(napbhH)Cl₂(H₂O)Mn^II(OAc)₂]. Replacement of aquo in these heterobimetallic complexes has been observed when the reactions are carried out in the presence of pyridine (py), 3-picoline (3-pic), or 4-picoline (4-pic). The molar conductances for these complexes in DMF indicates 1 : 1 electrolytes. Magnetic moment values suggest that these heterobimetallic complexes contain Mn^IV and Ru^III or Ru^III and Mn^II in the same structural unit. Electronic spectral studies suggest six coordinate metal ions. IR spectra reveal that the napbhH₂ ligand coordinates in its enol form to Mn^IV and bridges to Ru^III and in the keto form to Ru^III and bridging to Mn^II.     

Tuning the Magnetic Moment of [Ru2(DPhF)3(O2CMe)L]+ Complexes (DPhF=N,N′‐Diphenylformamidinate): A Theoretical Explanation of the Axial Ligand Influence

The magnetic behaviour of the compounds containing the [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)]⁺ ion (DPhF^?=N,N′‐diphenylformamidinate) shows a strong dependence on the nature of the ligand bonded to the axial position. The new complexes [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)(OPMe₃)][BF₄]?0.5 CH₂Cl₂ ( 1 ? 0.5 CH₂Cl₂) and [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)(4‐pic)][BF₄] ( 2 ) (4‐pic=4‐methylpyridine) clearly display this influence. Complex 1 ?0.5 CH₂Cl₂ shows a magnetic moment corresponding to a S=3/2 system affected by the common zero‐field splitting (ZFS) and a weak antiferromagnetic interaction, whereas complex 2 displays an intermediate behaviour between S=3/2 and S=1/2 systems. The experimental data of complex 1 are fitted with a model that considers the ZFS effect using the Hamiltonian ?_D= S ? D ? S . The weak antiferromagnetic coupling is introduced as a perturbation, using the molecular field approximation. DFT calculations demonstrate that, in the [Ru₂(O₂CMe)(DPhF)₃(L)]⁺ complexes, the energy level of the metal–metal molecular orbitals is strongly dependent on the nature of the axial ligand (L). This study reveals that the increase in the π‐acceptor character of L leads to a greater split between the π* and δ* HOMO orbitals. The influence of the axial ligand in the relative energy between the doublet and quartet states in this type of complexes was also analysed. This study was performed on the new complexes 1 ?0.5 CH₂Cl₂ and 2 . The previously isolated [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)(OH₂)][BF₄]?0.5 CH₂Cl₂ ( 3 ? 0.5 CH₂Cl₂) and [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)(CO)][BF₄]?CH₂Cl₂ ( 4 ?CH₂Cl₂) complexes were also included in this study as representative examples of spin‐admixed and low‐spin configurations, respectively. The [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)]⁺ ( 5 ) unit was used as a reference compound. These theoretical studies are in accordance with the different magnetic behaviour experimentally observed.     

Synthesis and Reactivity of Cationic Triruthenium Clusters Derived from 2‐Methyl‐ and 4‐Methylpyrimidines: From Conventional Cyclometalated Ligands to Novel Types of N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes

The methylation of the uncoordinated nitrogen atom of the cyclometalated triruthenium cluster complexes [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐2‐Mepyr)(CO)₁₀] ( 1 ; 2‐MepyrH=2‐methylpyrimidine) and [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐4‐Mepyr)(CO)₁₀] ( 9 ; 4‐MepyrH=4‐methylpyrimidine) gives two similar cationic complexes, [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐2,3‐Me₂pyr)(CO)₁₀]⁺( 2 ⁺) and [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐3,4‐Me₂pyr)(CO)₁₀]⁺ ( 9 ⁺), respectively, whose heterocyclic ligands belong to a novel type of N‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) that have the C_carbene atom in 6‐position of a pyrimidine framework. The position of the C‐methyl group in the ligands of complexes 2 ⁺ (on C²) and 9 ⁺ (on C⁴) is of key importance for the outcome of their reactions with K[N(SiMe₃)₂], K‐selectride, and cobaltocene. Although these reagents react with 2 ⁺ to give [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐2‐CH₂‐3‐Mepyr)(CO)₁₀] ( 3 ; deprotonation of the C²‐Me group), [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ₃‐κ³N¹,C⁵,C⁶‐4‐H‐2,3‐Me₂pyr)(CO)₉] ( 4 ; hydride addition at C⁴), and [Ru₆(μ‐H)₂{μ₆‐κ⁶N¹,N^1′,C⁵,C^5′,C⁶,C^6′‐4,4′‐bis(2,3‐Me₂pyr)}(CO)₁₈] ( 5 ; reductive dimerization at C⁴), respectively, similar reactions with 9 ⁺ have only allowed the isolation of [Ru₃(μ‐H)(μ₃‐κ²N¹,C⁶‐2‐H‐3,4‐Me₂pyr)(CO)₉] ( 11 ; hydride addition at C²). Compounds 3 and 11 also contain novel six‐membered ring NHC ligands. Theoretical studies have established that the deprotonation of 2 ⁺ and 9 ⁺ (that have ligand‐based LUMOs) are charge‐controlled processes and that both the composition of the LUMOs of these cationic complexes and the steric protection of their ligand ring atoms govern the regioselectivity of their nucleophilic addition and reduction reactions.     

IR,Raman, and Surface‐enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Study on Triruthenium Dipyridylamide Diruthenium Nickel Dipyridylamide Family: Metal‐metal Bonding and Structures

We report the infrared, Raman, and surface‐enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra of triruthenium dipyridylamido complexes and of diruthenium mixed nickel metal‐string complexes. From the results of analysis on the vibrational modes, we assigned their vibrational frequencies and structures. The infrared band at 323–326 cm^?1 is assigned to the Ru₃ asymmetric stretching mode for [Ru₃(dpa)₄Cl₂]^0–2+. In these complexes we observed no Raman band corresponding to the Ru₃ symmetric stretching mode although this mode is expected to have substantial Raman intensity. There is no frequency shift in the Ru₃ asymmetric stretching modes for the complexes with varied oxidational states. No splitting in Raman spectra for the pyridyl breathing line indicates similar bonding environment for both pyridyls in dpa^– , thus a delocalized structure in the [Ru₃]^6–8+ unit is proposed. For Ru₃(dpa)₄(CN)₂ complex series, we assign the infrared band at 302 cm^?1 to the Ru₃ asymmetric stretching mode and the weak Raman line at 285 cm^?1 to the Ru₃ symmetric stretching. Coordination to the strong axial ligand CN^– weakens the Ru‐Ru bonding. For the diruthenium nickel complex [Ru₂Ni(dpa)₄Cl₂]^0–1+, the diruthenium stretching mode ν_Ru‐Ru is assigned to the intense band at 327 and 333 cm^?1 in the Raman spectra for the neutral and oxidized forms, respectively. This implies a strong Ru‐Ru metal‐metal bonding.     

Ruthenium monoterpyridine complexes with 2,6-bis(benzoxazol-2-yl)pyridine as an ancillary ligand: Synthesis,structure and spectral studies

Ruthenium monoterpyridine complexes, [1]⁺ and [2]²⁺, with 2,6-bis(benzoxazol-2-yl)pyridine as an ancillary ligand, L, have been synthesized and characterized by UV–Vis, FT-IR and ¹H NMR spectroscopic techniques. The formulations of the complexes were confirmed by the single crystal structure of their perchlorate salts. In both complexes, the Ru^II center is hexa-coordinated in a distorted geometry. In complex [1]⁺, the ancillary ligand L behaves as a bidentate ligand; in [2]²⁺, however, it binds the metal center as a tridentate ligand. The central pyridine nitrogen of terpyridine (N_p,trpy) is in a cis position with respect to the central pyridine nitrogen of the ancillary ligand (N_p,benz) in complex [1]⁺ and in a trans-position in complex [2]²⁺. The cis orientation of N_p,trpy and N_p,benz in complex [1]⁺ forces L to behave as bidentate. The quasi-reversible Ru^II/Ru^III couple appears at 0.90 and 1.44 V versus SCE in the case of complex [1]⁺ and [2]²⁺, respectively. [1]⁺, in the presence of aqueous AgNO₃, affords [2]²⁺ through an intramolecular dissociative interchange pathway.