Frozen matrix photolysis of Group VIII M(CO)2Cl2L2 derivatives: Direct observation of CO-loss species and photochemical isomerization

Photolysis of Group VIII complexes of the form M(CO)₂X₂L₂ and chelated ruthenium compounds, Ru(CO)₂Cl₂(κ²-L) in frozen matrices results in CO-loss. In the case of Fe(CO)₂Br₂(PMe₃)₂ evidence is presented for photochemical bromide ion elimination.     

Synthesis and characterisation of chelated (1-cyanoethyl)ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes

The reaction between acrylonitrile and the RuH bond in HRu(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₃ results in the formation of a binuclear ruthenium(II) complex having chlorine bridges which are easily broken by sodio-derivatives of bidentate chelating ligands giving mononuclear hexacoordinated ruthenium(II) compounds. The RuC bond in these new complexes has been found to be stable towards nucleophilic reagents. The stereochemistry for these complexes has been suggested on the basis of IR, ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectra.     

Ruthenium(II) mediated C-H activation of substituted acetophenone thiosemicarbazones: Synthesis, structural characterization, luminescence and electrochemical properties

Treatment of [RuHCl(CO)(AsPh₃)₃] with 4′-substituted acetophenone thiosemicarbazone derivatives in methanol under reflux afford a series of air stable new ruthenium(II) cyclometalated complexes containing thiosemicarbazone of general formula [Ru(L)(CO)(AsPh₃)₂]. The 4′-substituted acetophenone thiosemicarbazone ligands behave as a dianionic terdentate C, N and S donors (L) and coordinates to ruthenium via aromatic carbon, the imine nitrogen and thiol sulfur. The compositions of the complexes have been established by elemental analysis, and spectral methods (FT-IR, UV-Vis, ¹H NMR, ESI-MS) and X-ray crystallography. In chloroform solution all the complexes exhibit metal-to-ligand charge transfer transitions (MLCT) in the visible region and are emissive at room temperature with quantum yield of 0.001-0.005. The crystal structure of one of the complexes [Ru(4CAP-PTSC)(CO)(AsPh₃)₂] (4) has been solved by single crystal X-ray crystallography and it indicates the presence of a distorted octahedral geometry in these complexes. All the complexes exhibit a quasi reversible one electron reduction (Ru^II/Ru^I) in the range −0.83 to −0.86 V. The formal potential of all the couples correlate linearly with the Hammett constant of the para substituent in phenyl fragment of the acetophenone thiosemicarbazone ligands.     

Hydrogenation of carbon monoxide by ruthenium complexes with iodide promoters: catalytic and mechanistic investigations

Carbon monoxide and hydrogen are converted into organic products, including methanol, ethylene glycol, and ethanol, by halide-promoted ruthenium catalysts in organic solvents. Iodide salts are exceptionally good promoters for this system. Spectroscopic and reaction studies have shown that two ruthenium complexes, HRu₃(CO)₁₁^? and Ru(CO)₃I₃^?, are present during catalysis and essential for optimum activity. Possible roles for the involvement of these complexes in catalysis are considered.     

Unexpected effect of catalyst concentration on photochemical CO2 reduction by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2: new mechanistic insight into the CO/HCOO– selectivity

Photochemical CO₂ reduction catalysed by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) efficiently produces carbon monoxide (CO) and formate (HCOO^–) in N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA)/water containing [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ as a photosensitizer and 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide (BNAH) as an electron donor. We have unexpectedly found catalyst concentration dependence of the product ratio (CO/HCOO^–) in the photochemical CO₂ reduction: the ratio of CO/HCOO^– decreases with increasing catalyst concentration. The result has led us to propose a new mechanism in which HCOO^– is selectively produced by the formation of a Ru(i)–Ru(i) dimer as the catalyst intermediate. This reaction mechanism predicts that the Ru–Ru bond dissociates in the reaction of the dimer with CO₂, and that the insufficient electron supply to the catalyst results in the dominant formation of HCOO^–. The proposed mechanism is supported by the result that the time-course profiles of CO and HCOO^– in the photochemical CO₂ reduction catalysed by [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl]₂ (0.05 mM) are very similar to those of the reduction catalysed by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ (0.10 mM), and that HCOO^– formation becomes dominant under low-intensity light. The kinetic analyses based on the proposed mechanism could excellently reproduce the unusual catalyst concentration effect on the product ratio. The catalyst concentration effect observed in the photochemical CO₂ reduction using [Ru(4dmbpy)₃]²⁺ (4dmbpy = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine) instead of [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ as the photosensitizer is also explained with the kinetic analyses, reflecting the smaller quenching rate constant of excited [Ru(4dmbpy)₃]²⁺ by BNAH than that of excited [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺. We have further synthesized trans(Cl)–Ru(6Mes-bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ (6Mes-bpy = 6,6′-dimesityl-2,2′-bipyridine), which bears bulky substituents at the 6,6′-positions in the 2,2′-bipyridyl ligand, so that the ruthenium complex cannot form the dimer due to the steric hindrance. We have found that this ruthenium complex selectively produces CO, which strongly supports the catalytic mechanism proposed in this work.     

Synthesis and characterisation of pentacoordinated ruthenium(II) hydrazone derivatives

Several new pentacoordinated ruthenium(II) compounds, Ru(PPh₃)₂L, of Schiff bases LH₂ are reported. The Schiff bases used have been derived from isonicotinoyl hydrazone and β-diketones or salicylaldehyde, or azines and mixed azines obtained from salicylaldehyde, benzoylacetone or 2-hydroxyacetophenone. These new compounds are highly coloured crystalline solids, stable and monomeric in toluene. They readily absorb carbon monoxide gas to give a carbonyl derivative of the type Ru(PPh₃)₂CO(L) in quantitative yields.     

Ruthenium carbonyl derivatives of N-salicylidene-2-hydroxyaniline

The ruthenium tricarbonyl derivative [Ru(CO)₃(sha)] (1), was synthesized from reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with N-salicylidene-2-hydroxyaniline (shaH₂) Schiff base. The corresponding reactions of the ruthenium cluster with shaH₂ in presence of a secondary ligand L,L?=?pyridine and triphenyl phosphine resulted in the formation of the dicarbonyl derivatives [Ru(CO)₂(shaH₂)(L)] (2, 3). In the presence of L?=?2-aminobenzimidazole or thiourea, two complexes [Ru(CO)₂(sha)(L)] (4, 5) were formed and the shaH₂ ligand bonded to ruthenium oxidatively. The bipyridine(bpy) derivative had the molecular formula [Ru(CO)₂(shaH)(bpy)] (6), with shaH coordinated bidentate. All complexes were characterized by elemental analysis and mass, IR, ¹H NMR and UV–Vis spectroscopy. The spectroscopic studies of these complexes revealed several structural arrangements and different tautomeric forms.     

Synthesis and Application of Ruthenium(II) Alkenyl Complexes with Perylene Fluorophores for the Detection of Toxic Vapours and Gases

A series of new ruthenium(II) vinyl complexes has been prepared incorporating perylenemonoimide (PMI) units. This fluorogenic moiety was functionalised with terminal alkyne or pyridyl groups, allowing attachment to the metal either as a vinyl ligand or through the pyridyl nitrogen. The inherent low solubility of the perylene compounds was improved through the design of poly-PEGylated (PEG=polyethylene glycol) units bearing a terminal alkyne or a pyridyl group. By absorbing the compounds on silica, vapours and gases could be detected in the solid state. The reaction of the complexes [Ru(CH=CH-Per^Im)Cl(CO)(py-3PEG)(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru(CH=CH-3PEG)Cl(CO)(py-Per^Im)(PPh₃)₂] with carbon monoxide, isonitrile or cyanide was found to result in modulation of the fluorescence behaviour. The complexes were observed to display solvatochromic effects and the interaction of the complexes with a wide range of other species was also studied. The study suggests that such complexes have potential for the detection of gases or vapours that are toxic to humans.     

Reactions of [Ru(CO)3Cl2]2 with aromatic nitrogen donor ligands in alcoholic media

The reactions of mono‐ and bidentate aromatic nitrogen‐containing ligands with [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂ in alcohols have been studied. In alcoholic media the nitrogen ligands act as bases promoting acidic behaviour of alcohols and the formation of alkoxy carbonyls [Ru(N–N)(CO)₂Cl(COOR)] and [Ru(N)₂(CO)₂Cl(COOR)]. Other products are monomers of type [Ru(N)(CO)₃Cl₂], bridged complexes such as [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂(N), and ion pairs of the type [Ru(CO)₃Cl₃]^? [Ru(N–N)(CO)₃Cl]⁺ (N–N = chelating aromatic nitrogen ligand, N = non‐chelating or bridging ligand). The reaction and the product distribution can be controlled by adjusting the reaction stoichiometry. The reactivity of the new ruthenium complexes was tested in 1‐hexene hydroformylation. The activity can be associated with the degree of stability of the complexes and the ruthenium–ligand interaction. Chelating or bridging nitrogen ligands suppresses the activity strongly compared with the bare ruthenium carbonyl chloride, while the decrease in activity is less pronounced with monodentate ligands. A plausible catalytic cycle is proposed and discussed in terms of ligand–ruthenium interactions. The reactivity of the ligands as well as the catalytic cycle was studied in detail using the computational DFT methods. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Regulation of electron donating ability to metal center: isolation and characterization of ruthenium carbonyl complexes with N,N- and/or N,O-donor polypyridyl ligands

Polypyridyl ruthenium(II) dicarbonyl complexes with an N,O- and/or N,N-donor ligand, [Ru(pic)(CO)₂Cl₂]⁻ (1), [Ru(bpy)(pic)(CO)₂]⁺ (2), [Ru(pic)₂(CO)₂] (3), and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺ (4) (pic=2-pyridylcarboxylato, bpy=2,2′-bipyridine) were prepared for comparison of the electron donor ability of these ligands to the ruthenium center. A carbonyl group of [Ru(L1)(L2)(CO)₂]ⁿ (L1, L2=bpy, pic) successively reacted with one and two equivalents of OH⁻ to form [Ru(L1)(L2)(CO)(C(O)OH)]ⁿ⁻¹ and [Ru(L1)(L2)(CO)(CO₂)]ⁿ⁻². These three complexes exist as equilbrium mixtures in aqueous solutions and the equilibrium constants were determined potentiometrically. Electrochemical reduction of 2 in CO₂-saturated CH₃CN–H₂O at −1.5 V selectively produced CO.     

Microcalorimetric studies of dodecacarbonyl(diiron)ruthenium and dodecacarbonyl(iron)diruthenium. Enthalpy contribution of heterometallic metal—metal bonds

Microcalorimetic measurements at 520–550 K of the heats of thermal decomposition of Fe₂Ru(CO)₁₂, FeRu₂(CO)₁₂ and Ru₃(CO)₁₂ lead to values of the standard enthalphy of formation (ΔH^o_f, c/kJ mol^-1) as follows: Fe₂Ru(CO)₁₂  (1820 ± 14); FeRu₂(CO)₁₂  (1891 ± 16); Ru₃(CO)₁₂  (1903 ± 18). Enthalpies of sublimation are estimated and the ironruthenium bond enthalpy contribution is derived as E(FeRu)  (95 ± 20) kJ mol^-1.     

Ruthenium Carbonyl Cluster Complexes with Phenylgermyl Ligands from the Reactions of Ph<Subscript>3</Subscript>GeH with Ru(CO)<Subscript>5</Subscript> and Ru<Subscript>3</Subscript>(CO)<Subscript>12</Subscript>

Four new triphenylgermylruthenium carbonyl compounds HRu(CO)₄GePh₃, 14; Ru(CO)₄(GePh₃)₂, 15; Ru₂(CO)₈(GePh₃)₂, 16; and Ru₃(CO)₉(GePh₃)₃(μ-H)₃, 17 were obtained from the reaction of Ru(CO)₅ with Ph₃GeH in hexane solvent at reflux, 68 °C. The major product 14 was formed by loss of CO from the Ru(CO)₅ and an oxidative addition of the GeH bond of the Ph₃GeH to the metal atom. This six coordinate complex contains one terminal hydrido ligand. Compound 15 is formed from 14 and contains two trans-positioned GePh₃ ligands in the six coordinate complex. Compound 16 contains two Ru(CO)₄(GePh₃) fragments joined by an Ru–Ru single bond. Compound 17 contains a triangular cluster of three ruthenium atoms with three bridging hydrido ligands and one terminal GePh₃ ligand on each metal atom. When heated to 125 °C, 14 was converted to the new triruthenium compound Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ-GePh₂)₂, 18. Compound 18 consists of a triangular tri-ruthenium cluster with two GePh₂ ligands bridging two different edges of the cluster and one bridging CO ligand. Ru₃(CO)₁₂ was found to react with Ph₃GeH at 97 °C to yield three products: 15, and two new compounds Ru₃(CO)₉(μ-GePh₂)₃, 19 and Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-GePh₂)₂(GePh₃)₂, 20 were obtained. Compound 19 is similar to 18 having a triangular tri-ruthenium cluster but has three bridging GePh₂ ligands, one on each Ru–Ru bond. Compound 20 contains only two ruthenium atoms joined by a single Ru–Ru bond that has two bridging GePh₂ ligands and a terminal GePh₃ ligand on each metal atom. All compounds were characterized by a combination of IR, ¹H NMR, single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. This report is dedicated to Professor Dieter Fenske on the occasion of his 65th birthday for his many pioneering contributions to the chemistry of metal chalcogenide cluster complexes.     

UV‐Visible and Electrochemical Monitoring of Carbon Monoxide Release by Donor Complexes to Myoglobin Solutions and to Electrodes Modified with Films Containing Hemin

This study reports on the evaluation of the CO donating behavior of tricarbonyl dichloro ruthenium(II) dimer ([Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂) and 1,3‐dimethoxyphenyl tricarbonyl chromium (C₆H₃(MeO)₂Cr(CO)₃) complex by UV‐visible technique and electrochemical technique. The CO release was monitored by following the modifications of the UV‐visible features of MbFe(II) in phosphate buffer solution and the redox features of reduced Hemin, HmFe(II), confined at the surface of a vitreous carbon electrode. In the latter case, the interaction between the hemin‐modified electrode and the released CO was seen through the observation of an increase of the reduction current related to the Fe^III/Fe^II redox process of the immobilized porphyrin. While the ruthenium‐based complex, ([Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂), depended on the presence of Fe(II) species to release CO, it was found that the chromium‐based complex released spontaneously CO. This was facilitated by illuminating and/or simple stirring of the solution containing the complex.     

The Influence of N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHC) on the Reactivity of [Ru(NHC)4H]+ With H2, N2, CO and O2

The five‐coordinate ruthenium N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) hydrido complexes [Ru(IiPr₂Me₂)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 1 ; IiPr₂Me₂=1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene; Ar^F=3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃), [Ru(IEt₂Me₂)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; IEt₂Me₂=1,3‐diethyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) and [Ru(IMe₄)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 3 ; IMe₄=1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) have been synthesised following reaction of [Ru(PPh₃)₃HCl] with 4–8 equivalents of the free carbenes at ambient temperature. Complexes 1 – 3 have been structurally characterised and show square pyramidal geometries with apical hydride ligands. In both dichloromethane or pyridine solution, 1 and 2 display very low frequency hydride signals at about δ ?41. The tetramethyl carbene complex 3 exhibits a similar chemical shift in toluene, but shows a higher frequency signal in acetonitrile arising from the solvent adduct [Ru(IMe₄)₄(MeCN)H][BAr^F₄], 4 . The reactivity of 1 – 3 towards H₂ and N₂ depends on the size of the N‐substituent of the NHC ligand. Thus, 1 is unreactive towards both gases, 2 reacts with both H₂ and N₂ only at low temperature and incompletely, while 3 affords [Ru(IMe₄)₄(η²‐H₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ) and [Ru(IMe₄)₄(N₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 8 ) in quantitative yield at room temperature. CO shows no selectivity, reacting with 1 – 3 to give [Ru(NHC)₄(CO)H][BAr^F₄] ( 9 – 11 ). Addition of O₂ to solutions of 2 and 3 leads to rapid oxidation, from which the Ru^III species [Ru(NHC)₄(OH)₂][BAr^F₄] and the Ru^IV oxo chlorido complex [Ru(IEt₂Me₂)₄(O)Cl][BAr^F₄] were isolated. DFT calculations reproduce the greater ability of 3 to bind small molecules and show relative binding strengths that follow the trend CO ? O₂ > N₂ > H₂.     

Antibacterial and luminescent properties of new donor–acceptor ruthenium triphenylphosphine–bipyridinium complexes

The known compounds N-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-4,4′-bipyridinium (2,4-DNPhQ⁺), N-phenyl-4,4′-bipyridinium (PhQ⁺) and N-(4-acetylphenyl)-4,4′-bipyridinium (4-AcPhQ⁺) have been used to prepare a series of ruthenium complexes of the type [RuCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(L)] (where, L = 2,4-DNPhQ⁺ or PhQ⁺ or 4-AcPhQ⁺). The latter complexes reacted with sulphur derivative to give [RuCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(L)(L′)] (where, L′ = thio-9-xanthone). These new ruthenium complexes display intense, visible metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) absorptions, due to dπ(Ru) → π*(pyridinium) excitations. The MLCT energy decreases as the acceptor strength increases in the order PhQ⁺ < 4-AcPhQ⁺ < 2,4-DNPhQ⁺. The new ruthenium complexes have been characterized by using standard analytical and spectroscopic techniques. Fluorescence and antibacterial activity of the ligands and appropriate complexes has also been carried out.     

Reactions of 2-(arylazo)aniline with ruthenium substrates: Isolation, characterizations and reactivities of delocalized diazoketiminato and orthometallated Ru(II) chelates

Reactions of 2-(arylazo)aniline, HL-NH₂ [H represents the dissociable protons upon complexation and HL-NH₂ is p-RC₆H₄NNC₆H₄-NH₂; R = H for HL¹-NH₂; CH₃ for HL²-NH₂ and Cl for HL³-NH₂] with Ru(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₃Cl and Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂ afforded products of compositions [(HL-NH)Ru(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂] and [(L-NH)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CO)], respectively. All the complexes were characterized unequivocally. The X-ray structures of the complexes 4c and 5c have been determined. The cyclic volatammograms exhibited one reversible oxidative response in the range of 0.56–0.16 V versus SCE for [(L-NH)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CO)] and a quasi reversible oxidative response within 0.56–0.70 V versus SCE for [(HL-NH)Ru(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂]. The conversion of ketones to corresponding alcohols has been studied in presence of newly synthesized ruthenium complexes.     

COMMUNICATION: CATALYSIS OF METHYL ACETATE FORMATION FROM METHANOL ALONE BY (η5-C5H5)(PPh3)2RuX (X = Cl,SnCl3, SnF3): HIGH ACTIVITY FOR THE SnF3 COMPLEX

Abstract

We have recently shown^1,2 that the Ru(II)-Sn(II) bimetallic complex can catalyze the unprecedented one-step formation of acetic acid (or methyl acetate) with methanol used as the sole source. It was suggested that the reaction consists of sequential processes of methanol → formaldehyde (methylal) → methyl formate → acetic acid (methyl acetate). While the Ru(II) complexes capable of catalyzing the dehydrogenation of methanol into methyl formate are known,^3–5 this catalyst system is unique because of its extra ability to isomerize methyl formate to acetic acid without a CO atmosphere (usually high pressure) or an iodide promoter (often corrosive to reaction apparatus).⁶ In this communication, we examine the cyclopentadienyl bis(triphenylphosphine) ruthenium(II) auxilliary in view of its well-defined geometry and configurational stability,⁷ and demonstrate that combination with the SnF₃ ^? ligand⁸ gives quite high catalytic ability compared to the conventional⁹ SnCl₃ ^? ligand.     

Synthesis, DNA binding, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of ruthenium(II) complexes of a Schiff base ligand

Three ruthenium(II) complexes, [Ru(CO)Cl(PPh₃)L], [Ru(CO)Cl(AsPh₃)L] and [Ru(CO)Cl(Py)L], were synthesized from the reactions of 2-(benzothiazol-2-yliminomethyl)-phenol (HL) with [RuHCl(CO)B(EPh₃)₂], where B = PPh₃, AsPh₃ or pyridine, and E = P or As. All the complexes have been characterized by physicochemical and spectroscopic methods. The structure of the free ligand HL was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The binding of the free ligand and its complexes with CT-DNA was studied using electronic absorption spectroscopy. In addition, the free ligand and its complexes were subjected to antioxidant activity tests, which showed that they all possess significant scavenging effects against DPPH and OH radicals. The in vitro cytotoxicities of the compounds were assessed using tumor (HeLa and MCF-7) cell lines.     

Amino acid complexes of ruthenium: synthesis, characterization and cyclic voltammetric studies

Reaction of α-amino acids (HL) with [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] in the presence of a base afforded a family of complexes of type [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L)₂]. These complexes are diamagnetic (low-spin d⁶, S=0) and show ligand-field transitions in the visible region. ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectra of the complexes indicate the presence of C₂ symmetry. Cyclic voltammetry on the [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L)₂] complexes show a reversible ruthenium(II)–ruthenium(III) oxidation in the range 0.30–0.42 V vs. SCE. An irreversible ruthenium(III)–ruthenium(IV) oxidation is also displayed by two complexes near 1.5 V vs. SCE.     

Ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes of dehydroacetic acid thiosemicarbazone: Synthesis, structure, light emission and biological activity

The reaction of [RuHCl(CO)(B)(EPh₃)₂] (where E = As, B = AsPh₃; E = P, B = PPh₃, py, pip, or mor) and dehydroacetic acid thiosemicarbazone (abbreviated as H₂dhatsc where H₂ stands for the two dissociable protons) in benzene under reflux afford a series of new ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes containing dehydroacetic acid thiosemicarbazone of general formula [Ru(dhatsc)(CO)(B)(EPh₃)] (where E = As, B = AsPh₃; E = P, B = PPh₃, py, pip or mor; dhatsc = dibasic tridentate dehydroacetic acid thiosemicarbazone). All the complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses, FT-IR, UV-Vis, and ¹H NMR spectral methods. The thiosemicarbazone of dehydroacetic acid behaves as dianionic tridentate O, N, S donor and coordinates to ruthenium via phenolic oxygen of dehydroacetic acid, the imine nitrogen of thiosemicarbazone and thiol sulfur. In chloroform solution, all the complexes exhibit metal-to-ligand charge transfer transitions (MLCT). The crystal structure of one of the complexes [Ru(dhatsc)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (1) has been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction which reveals the presence of a distorted octahedral geometry in the complexes. All the complexes exhibit an irreversible oxidation (Ru^III/Ru^II) in the range 0.76-0.89 V and an irreversible reduction (Ru^II/Ru^I) in the range −0.87 to −0.97 V. Further, the free ligand and its ruthenium complexes have been screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activities. The complexes show better activity in inhibiting the growth of bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli and fungus Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger. These results made it desirable to delineate a comparison between free ligand and its ruthenium complexes.