Structure and Dynamics of Lanthanide Complexes of Triethylenetetramine‐N,N,N′,N″,N′′′,N′′′‐hexaacetic Acid (H6ttha) and of Diamides H4ttha(NHR) Derived from H6ttha as Studied by NMR,NMRD, and EPR

A multinuclear NMR study on [Ln(ttha)]^3? and [Ln{ttha(NHR)₂}]^? complexes (R=Et, CH₂(CHOH)₄CH₂OH) shows that coordinating groups of the organic ligands in these complexes are occupying all coordination sites of the metal ions, leaving no space for coordination of H₂O molecules (H₆ttha=triethylenetetramine‐N,N,N′,N″,N′′′,N′′′‐hexaacetic acid). The lanthanides of the first half of the series bind the ttha‐type ligands in a decadentate fashion, while the complexes formed with the smaller ions of the second half of the lanthanide series are nonadentate. One carboxylate group of the ligand remains unbound in the latter complexes. In principle, the ttha complexes can exist in six enantiomeric forms. Only one of the pair of diastereoisomers can interconvert without decoordination of the ligand. This pair of isomers seems to be predominant in solution. For the [Ln{ttha(NHR)₂}]^? complexes, the number of chiral centers is larger, resulting in 32 possible enantiomeric forms of the complexes. The NMR spectra of [Nd{ttha(NHEt)₂}]^? indicate that two dynamic processes occur between the isomers in solution. The NMRD curves of [Gd(ttha)]^3?, [Gd{ttha(NHEt)₂}]^?, and [Gd{ttha(NHgluca)₂}]^? (NHgluca=D ‐glucamine) show significant differences with the previously determined outer‐sphere contributions to the NMRD profiles of the corresponding [Gd{dtpa(NHR)₂}]^? complexes, which can be ascribed to differences in the parameters determining the electronic relaxation.     

Synthesis and magnetic properties of copper (II)-manganese (II) compounds with N,N′-ethylenedisalicylamidatocuprate(II)

By the reaction of sodium N,N′-ethylenedisalicylamidatocuprate ( I ) pentahydrate, Na₂[Cu(samen)]·5H₂O, with a manganese ( I ) salt and 2,2′-dipyridyl (bpy) or 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), the binuclear metal complexes [Cu(samen) Mn(L)₂] (L ? bpy, phen) have been synthesized. Based on IR, elemental analyses and electronic spectra, the complexes are proposed to consist of a four-coordinated Cu( I ) in a distorted planar environment and Mn( I ) in a distorted octahedron. The complexes have been characterized with variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility (4.2—300 K) and the susceptibility data were least-squares fit to susceptibility equation derived from the spin Hamiltonian including single-ion zero-field interaction for Mn²⁺ ion, H?—2JS₁·S₂—DS, where D is the axial zero-field splitting parameter for the Mn(II) ion. The exchange integral, J, was found to be —34.6 and —28.8 cm^?1 for [Cu(samen)Mn(bpy)₂] and [Cu(samen)Mn(phen)₂] respectively. The weak antiferromagnetic spin-exchange interaction can be interpreted by considering σ-π exchange pathway.     

[N,N′‐Bis(3‐aminopropyl)ethylenediamine‐κ4N,N′,N′′,N′′′](trithiocyanurato‐κ2N,S)zinc(II) ethanol solvate

In the crystal structure of the title compound, [N,N′‐bis(3‐­amino­propyl)­ethyl­enedi­amine‐κ⁴N,N′,N′′,N′′′][1,3,5‐triazine‐2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)‐tri­thionato(2−)‐κ²N,S]­zinc(II) ethanol sol­vate, [Zn(C₈H₂₂N₄)₂(C₃HN₃S₃)]·C₂H₆O, the Zn^II atom is octa­hedrally coordinated by four N atoms [Zn—N = 2.104 (2)–2.203 (2) Å] of a tetradentate N‐donor N,N′‐bis(3‐­amino­propyl)­ethyl­enedi­amine (bapen) ligand and by two S and N atoms [Zn—S = 2.5700 (7) Å and Zn—N = 2.313 (2) Å] of a tri­thio­cyanurate(2−) (ttcH²⁻) dianion bonded as a bidentate ligand in a cis configuration. The crystal structure of the compound is stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds.     

Syntheses,Structures and Characterizations of Two Vanadium(V) Complexes:[2-MePyH][V^vO2(C14H9N2O3Br)] and [2-EtPyH][V^VO2(C14H9N2O3Br)]

Two new oxovanadium(V) complexes, [2‐MePyH][V^vO₂(L)] (3) and[2‐EtPyH][V^vO₂,(L)] (4) (salicylaldehyde 5‐bromo salicyloylhydrazone is abbreviated as H₂L; 2‐MePyH is protonated 2‐Mepyridine; 2‐EtPyH presents protonated 2‐Et‐pyridine) were obtained from a reaction of VOSO₄ and H₂L in acetonitrile‐methanol with small quantity of 2‐Me‐pyridine or 2‐Et‐pyridine, and characterized by X‐ray diffraction and spectroscopic methods. Crystal data: [2‐MePyH][VO₂(L)] (3), C₂₀H₁₇N₃O₅BrV, M_r = 510.2, monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 0.7363(1) nm, 6 = 0.9514(1) nm, c = 2.8594(2) nm, β = 95.305(2)°, Z = 4 and V=1.9946(3) nm³, μ(Mo Kα) = 2.539 mm^?1; [2‐EtPyH][VO₂(L)] (4), C₂₁H₁₉N₃ O₃BrV, M_r = 524.2, triclinic, P1 , a = 0.8051(1) nm, b = 0.9413(1) nm, c = 1.4648(2) nm, α=99.1900(10)°, α = 99.4530(10)°, γ = 104.6670(10)°, Z = 2 and V= 1.0355(2) nm³, μ(Mo Kα) = 2.448 mm^?1, X‐Ray analyses revealed that the crystal structures of 3 and 4 have similar packing modes.     

Masking of Lewis acidity trends in the solid‐state structures of trichlorido‐ and tribromido(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ3N,N′,N′′)gallium(III)

The molecular structures of trichlorido(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ³N,N′,N′′)gallium(III), [GaCl₃(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)], and tribromido(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ³N,N′,N′′)gallium(III), [GaBr₃(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)], are isostructural, with the Ga^III atom displaying an octahedral geometry. It is shown that the Ga—N distances in the two complexes are the same within experimental error, in contrast to expected bond lengthening in the bromide complex due to the lower Lewis acidity of GaBr₃. Thus, masking of the Lewis acidity trends in the solid state is observed not only for complexes of group 13 metal halides with monodentate ligands but for complexes with the polydentate 2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine donor as well.     

{μ‐N,N′‐Bis[2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl]oxamidato(2–)‐κ6N,N′,O′:N′′,N′′′,O}bis[(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ2N,N′)copper(II)] bis(perchlorate)

In the crystal structure of the title complex, [Cu₂(C₁₀H₂₀N₄O₂)(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂](ClO₄)₂, the deprotonated dmaeoxd²⁻ ligand {H₂dmaeoxd is N,N′‐bis[2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl]oxamide} occupies an inversion centre at the mid‐point of the central C—C bond and is thus in a trans conformation. The two Cu^II atoms are located in slightly distorted square‐based pyramidal environments. The binuclear units interact with each other viaπ–π interactions to form a one‐dimensional chain extending in the c direction.     

Schwingungs- und Elektronenspektren der Dekahalogenodiosmate(IV), [Os2X10]2−, X  Cl,Br

Vibrational and Electronic Spectra of Decahalogenodiosmates(IV), [Os₂X₁₀]^2?, X ? Cl, Br The IR and Raman spectra of the edge-sharing bioctahedral anions [Os₂X₁₀]^2?, X ? Cl, Br, are assigned according to point group D_2h. The bands are found in three characteristic regions; at high wavenumbers stretching vibrations with terminal ligands v(OsCl_t): 365–280, v(OsBr_t): 235–195; in a middle region with bridging ligands v(OsCl_b): 270–240, v(OsBr_b): 175–165 cm^?1; the deformation bands are observed at distinct lower frequencies. The electronic spectra of the dimers show intraconfigurational transitions near 2000, 1000, and 600 nm which by position and intensity correspond to those of the monomeric complexes. They are therefore discussed separately for both metal centers according to C_2v symmetry. Two additional band systems are presumable pair transitions arising from interactions of the central ions within the dimeric complexes. Due to the different bonding strength of terminal or bridging ligands the intensive charge transfer bands are shifted by 3000–4000 cm^?1 bathochromicly or by 2000–3000 cm^?1 hypsochromicly compared with the hexahaloosmates(IV).     

Complexation Properties of N,N′,N″,N′′′‐[1,4,7,10‐Tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetrayltetrakis(1‐oxoethane‐2,1‐diyl)]tetrakis[glycine] (H4dotagl). Equilibrium,Kinetic, and Relaxation Behavior of the Lanthanide(III) Complexes

Eu³⁺, Dy³⁺, and Yb³⁺ complexes of the dota‐derived tetramide N,N′,N″,N′′′‐[1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetrayltetrakis(1‐oxoethane‐2,1‐diyl)]tetrakis[glycine] (H₄dotagl) are potential CEST contrast agents in MRI. In the [Ln(dotagl)] complexes, the Ln³⁺ ion is in the cage formed by the four ring N‐atoms and the amide O‐atom donor atoms, and a H₂O molecule occupies the ninth coordination site. The stability constants of the [Ln(dotagl)] complexes are ca. 10 orders of magnitude lower than those of the [Ln(dota)] analogues (H₄dota=1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetraacetic acid). The free carboxylate groups in [Ln(dotagl)] are protonated in the pH range 1–5, resulting in mono‐, di‐, tri‐, and tetraprotonated species. Complexes with divalent metals (Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cu²⁺) are also of relatively low stability. At pH>8, Cu²⁺ forms a hydroxo complex; however, the amide H‐atom(s) does not dissociate due to the absence of anchor N‐atom(s), which is the result of the rigid structure of the ring. The relaxivities of [Gd(dotagl)] decrease from 10 to 25°, then increase between 30–50°. This unusual trend is interpreted with the low H₂O‐exchange rate. The [Ln(dotagl)] complexes form slowly, via the equilibrium formation of a monoprotonated intermediate, which deprotonates and rearranges to the product in a slow, OH^?‐catalyzed reaction. The formation rates are lower than those for the corresponding Ln(dota) complexes. The dissociation rate of [Eu(dotagl)] is directly proportional to [H⁺] (0.1–1.0M HClO₄); the proton‐assisted dissociation rate is lower for [Eu(H₄dotagl)] (k₁=8.1?10^?6 M ^?1 s^?1) than for [Eu(dota)] (k₁=1.4?10^?5 M ^?1 s^?1).     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Crystal Structure of Complexes of Lanthanide Picrates with N,N,N′,N′-tetraphenyl-3,6-dioxaoctanediamide

Lanthanide picrate complexes with the ligand N,N,N′,N′-tetraphenyl-3,6-dioxaactanediamide (tdd): [Ln(Pic)₃(tdd)] (Ln = La, Nd, Eu, Tb, Er) have been prepared in a nonaqueous medium and characterized by elemental analysis, conductivity measurements, IR, and ¹H-NMR spectra. The crystal structures of the complexes for Ln = Nd and Er were determined. The early lanthanide, Nd^III, crystallizes as the nona-coordinate complex [Nd(Pic)₃(tdd)]. 2 CH₃CN in the monoclinic space group P2₁n with a = 11.384(2), b = 18.805(4), c = 27.526(5) Å, β = 99.41(1)°, V = 5832(2) ų, and D_c = 1.58 gcm^?3 for Z = 4. The structure was refined to R = 0.0505, based on 4772 observed Deflections. The late lanthanide, Er^III, forms an octa-coordinate complex [Er(Pic)₃(tdd)]; crystals are triclinic, P1, with a = 12.449(2), b = 17.065(2), c = 26.243(4) Å, α = 72.12(1), β = 87.86(1), γ = 84.60(1)°, V = 5282(1) ų, and D_c = 1.68 g cm^?3 for Z, = 4. The structure was refined to R = 0.0469, based on 10666 observed reflections, The results reveal that tdd forms a ring-like structure with its four O-atoms, coordinating to the metal ions as multidentate ligand, together with one O-atom of the bidentate picrate. The structure of the complexes is greatly affected by the ionic radius due to participation of the picrates in coordination.     

Ligand Dynamics in the Solid: Lithium‐fluorenide and Lithium‐benzo[b]fluorenide N,N,N′,N′‐Tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda) Complexes

The dynamic behavior of the N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda) ligand has been studied in solid lithium‐fluorenide(tmeda) ( 3 ) and lithium‐benzo[b]fluorenide(tmeda) ( 4 ) using CP/MAS solid‐state ¹³C‐ and ¹⁵N‐NMR spectroscopy. It is shown that, in the ground state, the tmeda ligand is oriented parallel to the long molecular axis of the fluorenide and benzo[b]fluorenide systems. At low temperature (<250 K), the ¹³C‐NMR spectrum exhibits two MeN signals. A dynamic process, assigned to a 180° rotation of the five‐membered metallacycle (π‐flip), leads at elevated temperatures to coalescence of these signals. Line‐shape calculations yield ΔH^?=42.7 kJ mol^?1, ΔS^?=?5.3 J mol^?1 K^?1, and =44.3 kJ mol^?1 for 3 , and ΔH^?=36.8 kJ mol^?1, ΔS^?=?17.7 J mol^?1 K^?1, and =42.1 kJ mol^?1 for 4 , respectively. A second dynamic process, assigned to ring inversion of the tmeda ligand, was detected from the temperature dependence of T_1ρ, the ¹³C spin‐lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame, and led to ΔH^?=24.8 kJ mol^?1, ΔS^?=?49.2 J mol^?1 K^?1, and =39.5 kJ mol^?1 for 3 , and ΔH^?=18.2 kJ mol^?1, ΔS^?=?65.3 J mol^?1 K^?1, and =37.7 kJ mol^?1 for 4 , respectively. For (D₁₂)‐ 3 , the rotation of the CD₃ groups has also been studied, and a barrier E_a of 14.1 kJ mol^?1 was found.     

Synthesis of Two N,N′-bis(N,N-dialkylamide) Derivatives of Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid and the Stabilities of Their Complexes with Gd3+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+

Two bis(N,N-dialkylamide) derivatives of DTPA [(carboxymethyl)iminobis (ethylenenitrilo) tetraacetic acid], DTPA-BDMA = the bis(N,N-dimethylamide) and DTPA-BDEA = the bis(N,N-diethylamide) were synthesized. Their protonation constants were determined by potentiometric titration in 0.10 M Me₄NNO₃ and by NMR pH titration at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C. Stability and selectivity constants were measured to evaluate the possibility of using the corresponding gadolinium(III) complexes for magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. The stability constants of gadolinium(III), copper(II), zinc(II), and calcium(II) complexes with DTPA-BDMA and DTPA-BDEA were investigated quantitatively by potentiometry. The stability constant for gadolinium(III) complexes is larger than those for Ca(II), Zn(II), and Cu(II) complexes. The selectivity constants and modified selectivity constants of the amides for Gd³⁺ over endogenously available metal ions were calculated. Effectiveness of these two ligands in binding divalent and trivalent metal ions in biological media is assessed by comparing pM values at physiological pH 7.4. Spin-lattice relaxivity values R₁ for Gd(III) complexes were also determined. The observed relaxivity values were found to decrease with increasing pH in the acid range below pH 4 and relaxivity values became invariant with respect to pH changes over the range of 4–10. ¹⁷O NMR shifts showed that the [Dy(DTPA-BDMA)] and [Dy(DTPA-BDEA)] complexes had one inner-sphere water molecule. Water proton spin-lattice relaxation rates for the [Gd(DTPA-BDMA)] and [Gd(DTPA-BDEA)] complexes were also consistent with one inner-sphere gadolinium(III) coordination position.     

Low‐Dimensional Structural Units in Amine‐Templated Uranyl Oxoselenates(VI): Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [C3H12N2][(UO2)(SeO4)2(H2O)2](H2O), [C5H16N2]2[(UO2)(SeO4)2(H2O)](NO3)2, [C4H12N][(UO2)(SeO4)(NO3)], and [C4H14N2][(UO2)(SeO4)2(H2O)]

The crystals of four amine‐templated uranyl oxoselenates(VI), [C₃H₁₂N₂][(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)₂](H₂O) ( 1 ), [C₅H₁₆N₂]₂[(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)](NO₃)₂ ( 2 ), [C₄H₁₂N][(UO₂)(SeO₄)(NO₃)] ( 3 ), and [C₄H₁₄N₂][(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)] ( 4 ) were prepared by evaporation from aqueous solution of uranyl nitrate, selenic acid and the respective amine. The crystal structures of all four compounds have been solved by direct methods from X‐ray diffraction data. The structure of 1 (triclinic, , a = 7.5611(16), b = 7.7650(17), c = 12.925(3) Å, α = 94.605(18), β = 94.405(17), γ = 96.470(17)°, V = 748.8(3) ų, R₁ = 0.029 for 2769 unique observed reflections) is based upon 0D‐units of the composition [(UO₂)₂(SeO₄)₄(H₂O)₄]^4?. These discrete units are composed from two pentagonal [UO₇]^8? bipyramids linked via [SeO₄]^2? tetrahedra and are unknown in structural chemistry of uranium so far. The structure of 2 (monoclinic, C2/c, a = 28.916(5), b = 8.0836(10), c = 11.9856(16) Å, β = 110.909(11)°, V = 2617.1(6) ų, R₁ = 0.035 for 2578 unique observed reflections) contains [(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)]^2? chains of corner‐sharing pentagonal [UO₇]^8? bipyramids and [SeO₄]^2? tetrahedra. The chains run parallel to the c axis and are arranged into layers parallel to (100). In the structure of 3 (monoclinic, C2/m, a = 21.244(5), b = 7.1092(11), c = 8.6581(18) Å, β = 97.693(17)°, V = 1295.8(4) ų, R₁ = 0.027 for 1386 unique observed reflections), pentagonal [UO₇]^8? bipyramids share corners with three [SeO₄]^2? tetrahedra each and an edge with a [NO₃]^? anion to form [(UO₂)(SeO₄)(NO₃)]^? chains parallel to the b axis. In the structure of 4 (triclinic, , a = 6.853(2), b = 10.537(3), c = 10.574(3) Å, α = 99.62(3), β = 94.45(3), γ = 100.52(3)°, V = 735.6(4) ų, R₁ = 0.045 for 2713 unique observed reflections), one symmetrically independent pentagonal [UO₇]^8? bipyramid shares corners with four [SeO₄]^2? tetrahedra to form the [(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)]^2? chains parallel to the a axis. A comparison to related uranyl compounds is given.     

Phase transitions in (C7H12N2)2[SnCl6]Cl2·1.5H2O crystal,studied by NMR and infrared spectroscopy

The (C₇H₁₂N₂)₂[SnCl₆]Cl₂·1.5H₂O complex is a new member of the family of hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite compounds. It exhibits two order–disorder phase transitions with changes in the conformation of aromatic cations at the two transition temperatures 360 and 412 K. Differential scanning calorimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy were used to investigate these phase transitions. These transition mechanisms were investigated in terms of the spin–lattice relaxation times T1 for ¹H static NMR and the chemical shifts for ¹³C CP–MAS. The temperature dependence of T1(¹H) and ¹³C chemical shifts are changed near T_C1 and T_C2. Furthermore, the splitting for ¹³C NMR signals in Phases (II) and (III) indicated a ferroelastic characteristic of the compound. In addition, FT-IR results indicate that the ordered conformational structure of aromatic cations undergoes a remarkable disorder with increasing temperature. The NMR and FT-IR studies suggest that the phase transition mechanisms are related to the reorientational motion of [C₇H₁₂N₂]²⁺ cations as a whole. Phase transition was examined in light of the interesting optical properties of this material.     

N,N, N′, N′‐Tetrakis(diphenylphosphanyl)‐1, 3‐diaminobenzene as a Bis‐chelate Ligand in [1, 3‐{cis‐Mo(CO)4(PPh2)2N}2C6H4]

1, 3‐Diaminobenzene reacts readily with PPh₂Cl to give N, N, N′, N′‐tetrakis(diphenylphosphanyl)‐1, 3‐diaminobenzene ( 1 ) in excellent yield. The dinuclear complex [1, 3‐{cis‐Mo(CO)₄(PPh₂)₂N}₂C₆H₄] ( 2 ) is obtained in high yield from 1 and cis‐[Mo(CO)₄(NCEt)₂]. Compounds 1 and 2 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P) and by crystal structure determination. The latter shows the formation of a bis‐chelate complex with Mo‐P‐N‐P four‐membered rings.     

The Stability of Metal N,N,N′,N′‐Tetrakis(2‐aminoethyl)ethane‐ 1,2‐diamine (=penten) Complexes and the X‐Ray Crystal Structure of [Tl(NO3)(penten)](NO3)2

Complex formation between N,N,N′,N′‐tetrakis(2‐aminoethyl)ethane‐1,2‐diamine (penten) and the metal ions Mn²⁺, Co²⁺, Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺, Cd²⁺, Hg²⁺, Ag⁺, Pb²⁺, and Tl³⁺ (in 1.00M NaNO₃ and 25°) was investigated by potentiometry and spectrophotometry. These are the first reported values of the stability constants for this ligand with Ag⁺, Pb²⁺, and Tl³⁺. The X‐ray crystal structure of [Tl(NO₃)(penten)](NO₃)₂ was determined. In this structure, Tl³⁺ shows a coordination number of seven made up of the six N‐donors and one O‐atom of NO.     

The hydrogen‐bonded dimers of N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide in new tin(IV) and copper(II) complexes

In the new tin(IV) and copper(II) complexes, cis‐dichlorido‐trans‐dimethyl‐cis‐bis(N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide‐κO)tin(IV), [Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂(C₁₈H₃₆N₃OP)₂], (I), and trans‐diaquabis(N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide‐κO)copper(II) dinitrate–N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide (1/2), [Cu(C₁₈H₃₆N₃OP)₂(H₂O)₂](NO₃)₂·2C₁₈H₃₆N₃OP, (II), the N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide (PTA) ligands exist as hydrogen‐bonded dimers via P=O...H—N interactions around the metal center. The asymmetric unit in (I) consists of one complete complex molecule located on a general position. The Sn^IV coordination geometry is octahedral with two cis hydrogen‐bonded PTA ligands, two cis chloride ligands and two trans methyl groups. The asymmetric unit in (II) contains one half of a [Cu(PTA)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ dication on a special position (site symmetry for the Cu atom), one nitrate anion and one free PTA molecule, both on general positions. The complex adopts a square‐planar trans‐[CuO₂O₂] coordination geometry, with the Cu^II ion coordinated by two PTA ligands and two water molecules. Each of the noncoordinated PTA molecules is hydrogen bonded to a neighboring coordinated PTA molecule and an adjacent water molecule; the phosphoryl O atom acts as a double‐H‐atom acceptor. The P atoms in the PTA ligands of both complexes and in the noncoordinated hydrogen‐bonded molecules in (II) adopt a slightly distorted tetrahedral environment.     

μ‐{N,N′‐Bis[2‐(dimethyl­amino)ethyl]oxamidato(2–)}‐1κ2O,O′:2κ4N,N′,N′′,N′′′‐bis­(4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine‐1κ2N,N′)dinickel(II) bis­(perchlorate)

In the crystal structure of the title complex, [Ni₂(C₁₀H₂₀N₄O₂)(C₁₂H₁₂N₂)₂](ClO₄)₂ or [Ni(dmaeoxd)Ni(dmbp)₂](ClO₄)₂ {H₂dmaeoxd is N,N′‐bis­[2‐(dimethyl­amino)ethyl]oxamide and dmbp is 4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine}, the deprotonated dmaeoxd²⁻ ligand is in a cis conformation and bridges two Ni^II atoms, one of which is located in a slightly distorted square‐planar environment, while the other is in an irregular octa­hedral environment. The cation is located on a twofold symmetry axis running through both Ni atoms. The dmaeoxd²⁻ ligands inter­act with each other via C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π inter­actions, which results in an extended chain along the c axis.     

Bis[N,N′‐bis(2‐nitrocinnamaldehyde)phenylenediimine]copper(I) Perchlorate

The complex [Cu(nitroca₂ph)₂]ClO₄, where nitroca₂ph is N,N′‐bis(2‐nitrocinnamaldehyde)phenylenediimine, crystallizes in the triclinic space group with a = 13.167(1), b = 13.209(1), c = 14.465(1) Å, α = 83.209(9)°, β = 68.438(2)°, γ = 70.803(2)°, V = 2209.4(3) ų, Z = 2, D_calc = 1.527 mg/m³. The coordination polyhedron about the Cu(I) atom is best described as a distorted tetrahedron. 2‐nitroca₂en acts as a bidentate ligand coordinating via two N atoms to the copper. The four Cu–N distances are 2.04 (2), 2.038(2), 2.046(2), and 2.062(2) Å.     

Relaxivity Study and X-ray Structure of Gd(III)-diethylenetriamine-N,N′,N′-triacetic-N,N″-bis(benzylamide). A Potential MRI Contrast Agent

The new bis(amide) derivatives of DTPA (diethylenetriamine-N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentaacetic acid), diethylenetriamine-N,N′,N″-triacetic-N,N″-bis(benzylamide) (DTPA-BBA) have been synthesized. The crystal structure of gadolinium(III) complex of DTPA-BBA ([Gd(DTPA-BBA)]) has been determined by X-ray crystallography: C₂₈H₅₂GdN₅O₁₇, M_w = 889 g mol^?1, space group $ {\rm P}\bar 1 $ (#2) (triclinic), a = 12.645(4), b=14.125(8), c = 12.623(4) Å, α = 111.60(3), β = 114.79(3), γ = 88.39(4)°, V = 1881(1) ų, Z = 2, D_x = 1.569 g/cm³, λ(Mo Kα) =0.71069 Å, μ = 18.44 cm^?1, final R = 0.047, R_w = 0.046 for 3755 independent observed reflections at 23 °C. The coordination sphere of Gd(III) comprises three amine nitrogens, two amide oxygens, three carboxylic acid oxygens, and one water. The relaxivity of Gd(III) complex was determined to be R1 = 4.08(4) and R2 = 6.06(5) dm³ mmol^?1 s^?1 at pH = 7.0, 20 MHz, and 37(1) °C. Additionally, the R1 relaxivity for Gd(III) chelate was found to be invariant with respect to pH changes over the range of 2-10. This indicates that a constant inner-sphere hydration number is associated with the [Gd(DTPA-BBA)] complex. Hence the high stability of the complex is demonstrated.     

Two Heteroleptic Zinc(II) Complexes: [Zn(phen)(C9H15O6)2] and [Zn2(phen)2(H2O)2(C10H16O4)2] · 3H2O

Reactions of a freshly prepared Zn(OH)_2‐2x(CO₃)x · yH₂O precipitate, phenanthroline with azelaic and sebacic acid in CH₃OH/H₂O afforded [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] ( 1 ) and [Zn₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₂(C₁₀H₁₆O₄)₂] · 3H₂O ( 2 ), respectively. They were structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction methods. Compound 1 consists of complex molecules [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] in which the Zn atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and two O atoms of different monodentate hydrogen azelaato groups. Intermolecular C(alkyl)‐H···π interactions and the intermolecular C(aryl)‐H···O and O‐H···O hydrogen bonds are responsible for the supramolecular assembly of the [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] complexes. Compound 2 is built up from crystal H₂O molecules and the centrosymmetric binuclear [Zn₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₂(C₁₀H₁₆O₄)₂] complex, in which two [Zn(phen)(H₂O)]²⁺ moieties are bridged by two sebacato ligands. Through the intermolecular C(alkyl)‐H···O hydrogen bonds and π‐π stacking interactions, the binuclear complex molecules are assembled into layers, between which the lattice H₂O molecules are sandwiched. Crystal data: ( 1 ) C2/c (no. 15), a = 13.887(2), b = 9.790(2), c = 22.887(3)Å, β = 107.05(1)°, U = 2974.8(8)ų, Z = 4; ( 2 ) P1¯ (no. 2), a = 8.414(1), b = 10.679(1), c = 14.076(2)Å, α = 106.52(1)°, β = 91.56(1)°, γ = 99.09(1)°, U = 1193.9(2)ų, Z = 1.