The kinetics and equilibrium of the gas-phase reaction CH3CF2Br + I2 = CH3CF2I + IBr the C-Br bond dissociation energy in 1,1-difluorobromoethane

The kinetics and equilibrium of the gas-phase reaction of CH₃CF₂Br with I₂ were studied spectrophotometrically from 581 to 662°K and determined to be consistent with the following mechanism: A least squares analysis of the kinetic data taken in the initial stages of reaction resulted in log k₁ (M^?1 · sec^?1) = (11.0 ± 0.3) - (27.7 ± 0.8)/θ where θ = 2.303 RT kcal/mol. The error represents one standard deviation. The equilibrium data were subjected to a “third-law” analysis using entropies and heat capacities estimated from group additivity to derive ΔH_r° (623°K) = 10.3 ± 0.2 kcal/mol and ΔH_rr (298°K) = 10.2 ± 0.2 kcal/mol. The enthalpy change at 298°K was combined with relevant bond dissociation energies to yield DH°(CH₃CF₂ - Br) = 68.6 ± 1 kcal/mol which is in excellent agreement with the kinetic data assuming that E₂ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mol, namely; DH°(CH₃CF₂ - Br) = 68.6 ± 1.3 kcal/mol. These data also lead to ΔH_f°(CH₃CF₂Br, g, 298°K) = -119.7 ± 1.5 kcal/mol.     

Iodine catalyzed pyrolysis of dimethyl sulfide. Heats of formation of CH3SCH2I,the CH3SCH2 radical,and the pibond energy in CH2S

A kinetic study has been made of the gas phase, I₂-catalyzed decomposition of (CH₃)₂S at 630–650 K. Some I₂ is consumed initially, reaching a steady-state concentration. The initial major products are CH₄ and CH₂S together with small amounts of CH₃SCH₂I, CH₃I, HI, and CS₂. The initial reaction corresponds to a pseudo-equilibrium: accompanied by: and which brings (I₂) into steady state and a final complex reaction: From the initial rate of I₂ loss it is possible to obtain Arrhenius parameters for the iodination: We measure k₁, (644 K) = 150 L/mol s and from both the Arrhenius plot and independent estimates A₁ (644 K) = 10^{11.2 ± 0.3} L/mol s. Thus, E₁ = 26.7 ± 1 kcal/mol. From the steady-state I₂ concentration, an assumed mechanism and the known rate parameters for the CH₃I/HI system. It is possible to deduce K_A (644) = 3.8 × 10^?2 with an uncertainty of a factor of 2. Using an estimated ΔS (644) = 4.2 ± 1.0 e.u. we find ΔH_A (644) = 7.0 ± 1.1 kcal. With 〈ΔC_PA〉644 = 1.2 this becomes: ΔH_A(298) = 6.6 ± 1.1 kcal/mol. Then ΔH (CH₃SCH₂I) = 6.3 ± 1 kcal/mol. Making the assumption that E_?1 = 1.0 ± 0.5 kcal/mol we find ΔH (644) = 25.7 ± 0.7 kcal/mol and with 〈ΔC_PI〉 = 1.2; ΔH = 25.3 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. This gives ΔH (CH₃S?H₂) = 35.6 ± 1.0 kcal/mol and DH (CH₃SCH₂? H) = 96.6 ± 1.0 kcal/mol. This then yields E_π(CH₂S) = 52 ± 3 kcal. From the observed rate of pressure increase in the system and the preceding data k₃, is calculated for the step CH₃SCH₂ → CH₃ + CH₂S. From an estimated A-factor E₃ is deduced and from the overall thermochemistry values for k_?3 and E_?3. A detailed mechanism is proposed for the I-atom catalyzed conversion of CH₂S to CS₂ + CH₄.     

The very low-pressure pyrolysis of phenyl methyl sulfide and benzyl methyl sulfide. The enthalpy of formation of the methylthio and phenylthio radicals

The kinetics and mechanisms of the unimolecular decompositions of phenyl methyl sulfide (PhSCH₃) and benzyl methyl sulfide (PhCH₂SCH₃) have been studied at very low pressures (VLPP). Both reactions essentially proceed by simple carbon-sulfur bond fission into the stabilized phenylthio (PhS·) and benzyl (PhCH₂·) radicals, respectively. The bond dissociation energies BDE(PhS-CH₃) = 67.5 ± 2.0 kcal/mol and BDE(PhCH₂-SCH₃) = 59.4 ± 2 kcal/mol, and the enthalpies of formation of the phenylthio and methylthio radicals ΔH° _,298K(PhS·, g) = 56.8 ± 2.0 kcal/mol and ΔH°_{f, 298K}(CH₃S·, g) = 34.2 ± 2.0 kcal/mol have been derived from the kinetic data, and the results are compared with earlier work on the same systems. The present values reveal that the stabilization energy of the phenylthio radical (9.6 kcal/mol) is considerably smaller than that observed for the related benzyl (13.2 kcal/mol) and phenoxy (17.5 kcal/mol) radicals.     

Beiträge zur Chemie der Oxidhalogenide von Molybdän und Wolfram. IX. Bildungsenthalpie und Sättigungsdruck des MoOBr3

From the enthalpy of solution of MoOBr₃ in NaOH/H₂O₂ the enthalpy of formation ΔH°(MoOBr₃,f,298) = ?109,5(±0,4) kcal/mol was derived. The sublimation of MoOBr₃ is connected with simultaneous decomposition (see “Inhaltsübersicht”). From the temperature function of the saturated vapor pressure the values ΔH°(subl., MoOBr₃, 298) = 36(±1,5) kcal/mol and ΔS°(subl., MoOBr₃, 298) = 56(±3) cl are calculated.     

Very-low-pressure pyrolysis of N-methyl aniline and N,N-dimethyl aniline. Enthalpy of formation of the anilino and N-methyl anilino radicals

The kinetics of the thermal unimolecular decompositions of N-methyl aniline and N,N-dimethyl aniline into anilino and N-methyl anilino radicals, respectively, have been studied under very low-pressure conditions. The enthalpies of formation of both radicals, ΔH°_f,298°K(Ph?H,g) = 55.1 and ΔH°_f,298°K(Ph?Me,g) = 53.2 kcal/mol, which have been derived from the experimental data, lead to BDE(PhNH-H) = 86.4 ± 2, BDE[PhN(Me)-H] = 84.9 ± 2 kcal/mol and to a value of 16.4 kcal/mol for the stabilization energy of the PhNH radical (relative to MeNH). These results are discussed in connection with earlier work. At high temperatures, the anilino radical loses HNC and forms the very stable cyclopentadienyl radical, a decomposition comparable to that of the phenoxy radical.     

The Very low-pressure pyrolysis of 2-phenylethylamine. The enthalpy of formation of the aminomethyl radical

The thermal unimolecular decomposition of 2-phenylethylamine (PhCH₂CH₂NH₂) into benzyl and aminomethyl radicals has been studied under very-low-pressure conditions, and the enthalpy of formation of the aminomethyl radicals, ΔH°_{f, 298K} (H₂NCH₂·) = 37.0 ± 2.0 kcal/mol, has been derived from the kinetic data. This result leads to a value for the C—H bond dissociation energy in methylamine, BDE(H₂NCH₂—H) = 94.6 ± 2.0 kcal/mol, which is about 3.4 kcal/mol lower than in C₂H₆ (98 kcal/mol), indicating a sizable stabilization in α-aminoalkyl radicals.     

ab initio calculations and thermochemical analysis on C1 atom abstractions of chlorine from chlorocarbons and the reverse alkyl abstractions: Cl2 + R· ↔ Cl· + RCl

Thermodynamic properties (ΔH°_f(298), S°₍₂₉₈₎ and Cp(T) from 300 to 1500 K) for reactants, adducts, transition states, and products in reactions of CH₃ and C₂H₅ with Cl₂ are calculated using CBSQ//MP2/6‐311G(d,p). Molecular structures and vibration frequencies are determined at the MP2/6‐311G(d,p), with single‐point calculations for energy at QCISD(T)/6‐311 + G(d,p), MP4(SDQ)/CbsB4, and MP2/CBSB3 levels of calculation with scaled vibration frequencies. Contributions of rotational frequencies for S°₍₂₉₈₎ and Cp(T)'s are calculated based on rotational barrier heights and moments of inertia using the method of Pitzer and Gwinn [1]. Thermodynamic parameters, ΔH°_f(298), S°₍₂₉₈₎, and C_P(T), are evaluated for C₁ and C₂ chlorocarbon molecules and radicals. These thermodynamic properties are used in evaluation and comparison of Cl₂ + R· → Cl· + RCl (defined forward direction) reaction rate constants from the kinetics literature for comparison with the calculations. Data from some 20 reactions in the literature show linearity on a plot of Ea_fwd vs. ΔH_rxn,fwd, yielding a slope of (0.38 ± 0.04) and intercept of (10.12 ± 0.81) kcal/mole. A correlation of average Arrhenius preexponential factor for Cl· + RCl → Cl₂ + R· (reverse rxn) of (4.44 ± 1.58) × 10¹³ cm³/mol‐sec on a per‐chlorine basis is obtained with Ea_Rev = (0.64 ± 0.04) × ΔH_rxn,Rev + (9.72 ± 0.83) kcal/mole, where Ea_Rev is 0.0 if ΔH_rxn,Rev is more than 15.2 kcal/mole exothermic. Kinetic evaluations of literature data are also performed for classes of reactions. Ea_fwd = (0.39 ± 0.11) × ΔH_rxn,fwd + (10.49 ± 2.21) kcal/mole and average A_fwd = (5.89 ± 2.48) × 10¹² cm³/mole‐sec for hydrocarbons: Ea_fwd = (0.40 ± 0.07) × ΔH_rxn,fwd + (10.32 ± 1.31) kcal/mole and average A_fwd = (6.89 ± 2.15) × 10¹¹ cm³/mole‐sec for C₁ chlorocarbons: Ea_fwd = (0.33 ± 0.08) × ΔH_rxn,fwd + (9.46 ± 1.35) kcal/mole and average A_fwd = (4.64 ± 2.10) × 10¹¹ cm³/mole‐sec for C₂ chlorocarbons. Calculation results on the methyl and ethyl reactions with Cl₂ show agreement with the experimental data after an adjustment of +2.3 kcal/mole is made in the calculated negative Ea's. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 32: 548–565, 2000     

Kinetics and equilibria in the system Br + t-BuO2H ⇆ HBr + t-BuO2. OH bond dissociation energy in t-BuO2-H

The kinetics and equilibria in the system Br + t-BuO₂H ? HBr + t-BuO₂· have been measured in the range of 300–350 K using the very low pressure reactor (VLPR) technique. Using an estimated entropy change in reaction (1) ΔS₁ = 3.0 ± 0.4 cal/mol·K together with the measured ΔG₁, we find ΔH₁ = 1.9 ± 0.2 kcal/mol and DHº (t-BuO₂-H) = 89.4 ± 0.2 kcal/mol ΔH_f·(tBuO₂·) = 20.7 kcal/mol and DH^º (t-Bu-O₂) = 29.1 kcal/mol. The latter values make use of recent values of ΔH_f·(t-Bu) = 8.4 ± 0.5 kcal/mol and the known thermochemistry of the other species. The activation energy E₁ is found to be 3.3 ± 0.6 kcal/mol, about 1 kcal lower than the value found for Br attack on H₂O₂. It suggests a bond 1 kcal stronger in H₂O₂ than in tBuO₂H.     

Zur thermischen Zersetzung und Sublimation des NiI2

Thermical Decomposition and Sublimation of NiI₂ In a membran manometer the thermical decomposition and the sublimation of NiI₂ was measured and in ampuls the sublimation of NiI₂ studied. From the total pressure and the sublimation pressure the enthalpy of formation ΔH°(f,NiI₂,f,298) = ?20 ± 2 kcal/mole and ΔH°(f,NiI₂,g,298) = +31.2 ± 5 kcal/mole was derived. The entropy dates are: S°(NiI₂,f,298) = 35 ± 2 cl, S°(NiI₂,g,298) = 80 ± 1 cl and S°(Ni₂I₄,g,298) = 128 ± 3 cl respectively. The Ni formed with NiI₂ an eutectical system.     

Definitive heat of formation of methylenimine,CH2NH,and of methylenimmonium ion,CH2NH2+, by means of W2 theory

A long‐standing controversy concerning the heat of formation of methylenimine has been addressed by means of the W2 (Weizmann‐2) thermochemical approach. Our best calculated values, ΔH°_f,298(CH₂NH) = 21.1±0.5 kcal/mol and ΔH°_f,298(CH₂NH₂⁺) = 179.4±0.5 kcal/mol, are in good agreement with the most recent measurements but carry a much smaller uncertainty. As a byproduct, we obtain the first‐ever accurate anharmonic force field for methylenimine: upon consideration of the appropriate resonances, the experimental gas‐phase band origins are all reproduced to better than 10 cm^?1. Consideration of the difference between a fully anharmonic zero‐point vibrational energy and B3LYP/cc‐pVTZ harmonic frequencies scaled by 0.985 suggests that the calculation of anharmonic zero‐point vibrational energies can generally be dispensed with, even in benchmark work, for rigid molecules. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 22: 1297–1305, 2001     

The very-low-pressure study of the kinetics and equilibrium: Cl + CH4 ⇄ CH3 + HCl at 298 K. The heat of formation of the CH3 radical

The bimolecular rate constant for the direct reaction of chlorine atoms with methane was measured at 25°C by using the very-low-pressure-pyrolysis technique. The rate constant was found to be In addition, the ratio k₁/k_?1 was observed with about 25% accuracy: K₁₍₂₉₈₎ = 1.3 ± 0.3. This gives a heat of formation of the methyl radical ΔH° _{f 298}(CH₃) = 35.1 ± 0.15 kcal/mol. A bond dissociation energy BDE (CH₃ ? H) = 105.1 ± 0.15 kcal/mol in good agreement with literature values was obtained.     

Thermische Zersetzung und Lösungskalorimetrie von Ammoniumsamariumbromiden

Thermal Decomposition and Solution Calorimetry of Ammonium Samarium Bromides The ternary pure phases on the line SmBr₃—NH₄Br in the thermodynamically equilibrium have been synthesized by solid state reactions and characterized by X‐ray powderdiffraction. The existence of a new phase (NH₄)₃SmBr₆ was demonstrated beside the known phases (NH₄)₂SmBr₅ and NH₄Sm₂Br₇. The decomposition equilibria of the ammonium samarium bromides have been investigated by total pressure measurements and the thermodynamical data of the solid phase complexes derived from the decompostion functions. The standard enthalpies of solution in 4n HBr (aq.) of the ternary phases, SmBr₃ and Sm₂O₃, were measured and on the basis of these values and known data the standard enthalpies of ammonium samarium bromides were derived. The phase diagram is constructed on the basis of DTA measurements. Data from total pressure measurements: ΔH((NH₄)₃SmBr_{6, f, 298}) = —400, 0 ± 6, 5 kcal/mol S°((NH₄)₃SmBr_{6, f, 298}) = 146, 9 ± 8 cal/K · mol ΔH((NH₄)₂SmBr_{5, f, 298}) = —340, 6 ± 5, 0 kcal/mol S°((NH₄)₂SmBr_{5, f, 298}) = 106, 0 ± 6 cal/K · mol Δ(NH₄Sm₂Br_{7, f, 298}) = —479, 4 ± 6, 0 kcal/mol S°(NH₄Sm₂Br_{7, f, 298}) = 119, 5 ± 7 cal/K · mol Data from solution calorimetry: ΔH(SmBr_{3, f, 298}) = —204, 4 ± 1, 8 kcal/mol ΔH((NH₄)₃SmBr_{6, f, 298}) = —400, 7 ± 3, 2 kcal/mol ΔH((NH₄)₂SmBr_{5, f, 298}) = —339, 6 ± 2, 6 kcal/mol ΔH(NH₄Sm₂Br_{7, f, 298}) = —475, 6 ± 4, 4 kcal/mol     

Kinetic studies of the reactions CH2I2 + HI⇄CH3I + I2 and 2 CH3I⇄CH4 + CH2I2 the heat of formation of the iodomethyl radical

The rate of the reaction CH₂I₂ + HI ? CH₃I + I₂ has been followed spectrophotometrically from 201.0 to 311.2°. The rate constant for the reaction fits the equation, log (k₁/M^?1 sec^?1) = 11.45 ± 0.18 - (15.11 ± 0.44)/θ. This value, combined with the assumption that E₂ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mole, leads to ΔH (CH₂I, g) = 55.0 ± 1.6 kcal/mole and DH (H? CH₂I) = 103.8 ± 1.6 kcal/mole. The kinetics of the disproportionation, 2 CH₃I ? CH₄ + CH₂I₂ were studied at 331° and are compatible with the above values.     

Analysis of the kinetics of the thermal and chemically activated elimination of HF from 1,1,1-trifluoroethane: the C?C bond dissociation energy and the heat of formation of 1,1,1-trifluoroethane

The thermal, unimolecular elimination of HF from CH₃CF₃ was studied by three different groups over the temperature range 1000° to 1800°K. While the reported kinetic parameters varied greatly, it is shown here that these data may be satisfactorily correlated in terms of a four-center transition state. This correlation results in ΔE = 69.2 kcal/mol, and log (k/s^?1) = 14.6 – 72.6/θ. These results may then be combined with the kinetics of the chemically activated elimination of HF from CH₃CF₃ formed by the recombination of methyl and trifluoromethyl radicals. The data from three different laboratories are shown to be in excellent agreement. These data, combined with extant thermal data, yield as a best value DH(CH₃? CF₃) = 99.6 ± 1.1 kcal/mol. This gives the unexpectedly high value of DH₂₉₈°(CH₃? CF₃) = 101.2 ± 1.1 kcal/mol. It is suggested that dipoledipole interactions, primarily in CH₃CF₃, account for this surprisingly strong C? C bond dissociation energy. These results also yield δH(CH₃CF₃; g, 298) = ?178.6 ± 1.5 kcal/mol.     

Kinetics of the I2-catalyzed isomerization of allyl chloride to cis- and trans-1-chloro-1-propene. The stabilization energy of the chloroallyl radical

The I₂-catalyzed isomerization of allyl chloride to cis- and trans- l-chloro-l-propene was measured in a static system in the temperature range 225–329°C. Propylene was found as a side product, mainly at the lower temperatures. The rate constant for an abstraction of a hydrogen atom from allyl chloride by an iodine atom was found to obey the equation log [k,/M^?1 sec^?1] = (10.5 ± 0.2) ?; (18.3 ± 10.4)/θ, where θ is 2.303RT in kcal/mole. Using this activation energy together with 1 ± 1 kcal/mole for the activation energy for the reaction of HI with alkyl radicals gives DH⁰ (CH₂CHCHCl? H) = 88.6 ± 1.1 kcal/mole, and 7.4 ± 1.5 kcal/mole as the stabilization energy (SE) of the chloroallyl radical. Using the results of Abell and Adolf on allyl fluoride and allyl bromide, we conclude DH⁰ (CH₂CHCHF? H) = 88.6 ± 1.1 and DH⁰ (CH₂CHCHBr? H) = 89.4 ± 1.1 kcal/ mole; the SE of the corresponding radicals are 7.4 ± 2.2 and 7.8 ± 1.5 kcal/mole. The bond dissociation energies of the C? H bonds in the allyl halides are similar to that of propene, while the SE values are about 2 kcal/mole less than in the allyl radical, resulting perhaps more from the stabilization of alkyl radicals by α-halogen atoms than from differences in the unsaturated systems.     

Synthesis and Diels-Alder Reactivity of 2,3,5,6-Tetramethylidenenorbornane

Pd-catalyzed double carbomethoxylation of the Diels-Alder adduct of cyclo-pentadiene and maleic anhydride yielded the methyl norbornane-2,3-endo-5, 6-exo-tetracarboxylate ( 4 ) which was transformed in three steps into 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-idenenorbornane ( 1 ). The cycloaddition of tetracyanoethylene (TCNE) to 1 giving the corresponding monoadduct 7 was 364 times faster (toluene, 25°) than the addition of TCNE to 7 yielding the bis-adduct 9 . Similar reactivity trends were observed for the additions of TCNE to the less reactive 2,3,5,6-tetramethylidene-7-oxanorbornane ( 2 ). The following second order rate constants (toluene, 25°) and activation parameters were obtained for: 1 + TCNE → 7 : k₁ = (255 + 5) 10^?4 mol^?1 · s^?1, ΔH≠ = (12.2 ± 0.5) kcal/mol, ΔS≠ = (?24.8 ± 1.6) eu.; 7 + TCNE → 9 , k₂ = (0.7 ± 0.02) 10^?4 mol^?1 · s^?1, ΔH≠ = (14.1 ± 1.0) kcal/mol, ΔS≠ = ( ?30 ± 3.5) eu.; 2 + TCNE → 8 : k₁ = (1.5 ± 0.03) 10^?4 mol^?1 · s^?1, ΔH≠ = (14.8 ± 0.7) kcal/mol, ΔS≠ = (?26.4 ± 2.3) eu.; 8 + TCNE → 10 ; k₂ = (0.004 ± 0.0002) 10^?4 mol^?1 · s^?1, ΔH≠ = (17 ± 1.5) kcal/mol, ΔS≠ = (?30 ± 4) eu. The possible origins of the relatively large rate ratios k₁/k₂ are discussed briefly.     

Thermolysis of 3‐alkyl‐3‐methyl‐1,2‐dioxetanes: activation parameters and chemiexcitation yields

3‐Methyl‐3‐(3‐pentyl)‐1,2‐dioxetane 1 and 3‐methyl‐3‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐1‐propyl)‐1,2‐dioxetane 2 were synthesized in low yield by the α‐bromohydroperoxide method. The activation parameters were determined by the chemiluminescence method (for 1 ΔH‡ = 25.0 ± 0.3 kcal/mol, ΔS‡ = −1.0 entropy unit (e.u.), ΔG‡ = 25.3 kcal/mol, k₁ (60°C) = 4.6 × 10⁻⁴s⁻¹; for 2 ΔH‡ = 24.2 ± 0.2 kcal/mol, ΔS‡ = −2.0 e.u., ΔG‡ = 24.9 kcal/mol, k₁ (60°C) = 9.2 × 10⁻⁴s⁻¹. Thermolysis of 1–2 produced excited carbonyl fragments (direct production of high yields of triplets relative to excited singlets) (chemiexcitation yields for 1: ϕ^T = 0.02, ϕ^S ≤ 0.0005; for 2: ϕ^T = 0.02, ϕ^S ≤ 0.0004). The results are discussed in relation to a diradical‐like mechanism. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 12:176–179, 2001     

Data on the thermochemistry of azoalkanes

The rate constant of the primary decomposition step was determined for four symmetrical and four unsymmetrical azoalkanes. From the experimental activation energies and some literature enthalpy data, the following enthalpies of formation of radicals and group contributions were calculated: ΔH_? (CH₃N₂) = 51.5 ± 1.8 kcal mol^?1, ΔH_? (C₂H₅N₂) = 44.8 ± 2.5 kcal mol^?1, ΔH_? (2?C₃H₇N₂) = 37.9 ± 2.2 kcal mol^?1, [N_A-(C)] = 27.6 ± 3.7 kcal mol^?1, [N_A-(?_A) (C)] = 61.2 ± 3.1 kcal mol^?1.     

Thermochemistry and kinetics of the reaction of methyl mercaptan with iodine

The gas-phase reaction CH₃SH + I₂ has been studied spectrophotometrically over the temperature range of 476–604 K. It was found that the reaction undergoes H abstraction by I at ≤575 K, leading to the formation of MeSI and followed by a secondary reaction which leads to the formation of MeSSMe: Taking into consideration the effect of reaction (2), the equilibrium constant K₁ (554 K) has been evaluated to be 0.025 ± 0.004. This value was combined with the estimated values S (CH₃SI, g) = 73.7 ± 1.0 eu and 〈ΔC〉 = 0.87 ± 0.3 eu to obtain ΔH = 4.03 ± 0.73 kcal/mol. This yields ΔH (CH₃SI, g) = 7.16 ± 0.73 kcal/mol when combined with known thermochemical values for CH₃SH, HI, and I₂. A kinetic study was vitiated by the concurrent heterogeneous reaction of MeSH and I₂ at lower temperatures and the rather complicated chemistry occurring at elevated temperatures. However, attempts at measuring rate constants at 554 K lead to a lower limit of ΔH (CH₃S·, g) ≥ 29.5 ± 2 kcal/mol when an estimated value of A = 10^{10.8 ± 0.2} L/mol·s for the reactionc is used. DH (CH₃S–I) is estimated to be 49.3 ± 1.7 kcal/mol. The bond strengths of some divalent sulfurs and the reaction mechanisms are discussed. A crude estimate of DH⁰(H–CH₂SH) = 96 ± 1 kcal has been obtained from the kinetic data.     

Calculation of Some Thermodynamic Properties and Detonation Parameters of 1‐Ethyl‐3‐Methyl‐H‐Imidazolium Perchlorate, [Emim][ClO4], on the Basis of CBS‐4M and CHEETAH Computations Supplemented by VBT Estimates

This paper estimates some thermochemical (in kcal mol^–1) and detonation parameters for the ionic liquid, [emim][ClO₄] and its associated solid in view of its investigation as an energetic material. The thermochemical values estimated, employing CBS‐4M computational methodology and volume‐based thermodynamics (VBT) include: lattice energy, U_POT([emim][ClO₄]) ≈? 123 ± 16 kcal · mol^–1; enthalpy of formation of the gaseous cation, Δ_fH°([emim]⁺, g) = 144.2 kcal · mol^–1 and anion, Δ_fH°([ClO₄]^–, g) = –66.1 kcal · mol^–1; the enthalpy of formation of the solid salt, Δ_fH°([emim][ClO₄],s) ≈? –55 ± 16 kcal · mol^–1 and for the associated ionic liquid, Δ_fH^o([emim][ClO₄],l) = –52 ± 16 kcal · mol^–1 as well as the corresponding Gibbs energy terms: Δ_fG°([emim][ClO₄],s) ≈? +29 ± 16 kcal · mol^–1 and Δ_fG^o([emim][ClO₄],l) = +24 ± 16 kcal · mol^–1 and the associated standard absolute entropies, of the solid [emim][ClO₄], S°₂₉₈([emim][ClO₄],s) = 83 ± 4 cal · K^–1 · mol^–1. The following combustion and detonation parameters are assigned to [emim][ClO₄] in its (ionic) liquid form: specific impulse (I_sp) = 228 s (monopropellant), detonation velocity (V_oD) = 5466 m · s^–1, detonation pressure (p_C–J) = 99 kbar, explosion temperature (T_ex) = 2842 K.