SI-traceable certification of the IMEP-12 water sample combining contributions from different reference laboratories

In the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) comparison, a synthetically prepared water sample was offered to the analytical laboratories to perform measurements of As, B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni and Pb. The choice of elements to be measured was based on EU legislation, which the comparison was aiming to support. As to the IMEP policy, the laboratories’ results were presented according to the certified/assigned reference values established by several reference laboratories all around the world. The performed certification campaign is described in detail in this paper. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) was applied as a primary method of measurement (PMM), whenever possible, to achieve SI-traceable results. Apart from IDMS for reference measurements of some elements, k _o-neutron activation analysis (k _o-NAA) and external calibration (Ext-Calib) using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were applied. The reference values were characterised as “certified” (for B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ni and Pb) or “assigned” (for As and Mn) according to the IMEP policy. Measurement uncertainty of the certified/assigned reference values was calculated according to the ISO/BIPM guide using the specialised software GUM Workbench.

     

SI-traceable certification of the IMEP-12 water sample combining contributions from different reference laboratories

In the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) comparison, a synthetically prepared water sample was offered to the analytical laboratories to perform measurements of As, B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni and Pb. The choice of elements to be measured was based on EU legislation, which the comparison was aiming to support. As to the IMEP policy, the laboratories’ results were presented according to the certified/assigned reference values established by several reference laboratories all around the world. The performed certification campaign is described in detail in this paper. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) was applied as a primary method of measurement (PMM), whenever possible, to achieve SI-traceable results. Apart from IDMS for reference measurements of some elements, k _o-neutron activation analysis (k _o-NAA) and external calibration (Ext-Calib) using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were applied. The reference values were characterised as “certified” (for B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ni and Pb) or “assigned” (for As and Mn) according to the IMEP policy. Measurement uncertainty of the certified/assigned reference values was calculated according to the ISO/BIPM guide using the specialised software GUM Workbench.     

International Measurement Evaluation Programme: IMEP-9, trace elements in water

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme, founded, owned and coordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-9 is the third round of trace elements in water evaluation following IMEP-3 and IMEP-6. Reference values for 15 elements stating total concentrations and combined uncertainties (according to GUM) were established. The reference values were established mainly by isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) as a primary method of measurement, and values traceable to the SI were obtained. The four elements that could not be certified by IDMS were assigned values by means of other measurement techniques. Results from 201 laboratories from 35 countries and four continents were evaluated against the reference values and the comparability between the laboratories is presented graphically.     

Establishment of SI-traceable reference values for the content of various elements in the IMEP-14 sediment sample

For the first time in the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP)-14, a sediment sample was offered to analytical laboratories to perform measurements of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Hg, Ni, U and Zn. In line with IMEP policy, the results were presented according to the certified / assigned reference values established by several reference laboratories around the world. The certification campaign is described in detail. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry was applied as a primary method of measurement, whenever possible, to achieve SI-traceable results. For reference measurements of As, Fe, Hg and Zn, k₀-neutron activation analysis and Zeeman atomic absorption spectrometry were applied. The reference values (ranges) were characterised as ”certified” (for Cd, Cr, Pb, Ni and U) or ”assigned” (for As, Cu, Fe, Hg and Zn) according to IMEP policy. The measurement uncertainty of the certified / assured reference values was calculated according to the ISO/BIPM Guide. Received: 7 June 2001-10-27 Accepted: 19 August 2001     

Contribution to the certification of B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U in a natural water sample for the International Measurement Evaluation Programme Round 9 (IMEP-9) using ID-ICP-MS

 The present paper describes the contribution of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements to the certification of B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U amount contents in a natural water sample, in round 9 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-9). The analytical procedure to establish the reference values for B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U amount contents was based on isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry used as a primary method of measurement. Applying this procedure reference values, traceable to the SI, were obtained for the natural water sample of IMEP-9. For each of the certified amount contents presented here a total uncertainty budget was calculated using the method of propagation of uncertainties according to ISO and EURACHEM guidelines. The measurement procedures, as well as the uncertainty calculations are described for all seven elements mentioned above. In order to keep the whole certification process transparent and so traceable, the preparations of various reagents and materials as well as the sample treatment and blending, the measurements themselves, and finally the data treatment are described in detail. Explanations focus on Pb as a representative example. The total uncertainties (relative) obtained were less than 2% for all investigated elements at amount contents in the pmol/kg up to the high μmol/kg range, corresponding to low μg/kg and mg/kg levels. Received: 21 October 1999 / Accepted: 29 January 2000     

Evaluation of laboratory performance in IMEP water interlaboratory comparisons

The aim of International Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to present objectively the quality of chemical measurements. Participants in IMEP compare their reported measurement results with independent external certified reference values with demonstrated traceability and uncertainty, as evaluated according to international guidelines. Three major interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs), IMEP-6, IMEP-9 and IMEP-12, on trace elements in water were carried out from 1994 to 2000. Participants' results for Cd, Fe and Pb concentrations from these three different IMEP water ILCs were compared by means of suitable performance indicators. The performance evaluation criteria were set according to the requirements stated in the Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Two different performance indicators were selected for evaluation of the individual participants' results: the commonly used z-score and the not so well-known E _n number. The group performance indicator is based on the variation of z-scores. To assess the individual measurement performance, not only the deviation of the reported measurement values from the certified reference value, but also criteria for maximum and minimum acceptable uncertainties were taken into account. The participants' performance is also reviewed by means of using a simple graphical tool, called “Naji-plots”.     

The interlaboratory comparison "IMEP-19 trace elements in rice"—a new approach for measurement performance evaluation

The aim of IMEP is to present objectively the quality of chemical measurements. Participants in IMEP compare their reported measurement results with independent external certified reference values with demonstrated traceability and uncertainty, as evaluated according to international guidelines. IMEP-19 focused on measurements of trace elements in rice aiming to support the Commission Regulation (EC) No. 466/2001 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuff. Measurement results for the elements Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn were reported by 267 field laboratories involved in food analysis from 43 countries. Performance criteria for the evaluation of the reported measurement results in IMEP-19 are suggested. The chosen performance indicators not only take into account the deviation of the reported measurement value from the certified reference value, but also set criteria for maximum and minimum acceptable uncertainty. The IMEP-19 participants' performance is reviewed by means of using new simple graphical tools, called "Naji plots".     

Establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges for the content of various elements in the IMEP-9 water sample

 The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) attempts to shed light on the current state of the practice in chemical measurements. The main tool, which assists this attempt and also differentiates IMEP from similar projects, is the establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges (where possible) for the elements offered for measurement to the participants for every IMEP round. The Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM), as the founder and co-ordinator of IMEP has the responsibility of establishing the SI-traceable reference ranges. This is a large task that requires knowledge, skill and resources. IRMM collaborates with a network of reference laboratories in order to achieve the establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges in a transparent and reliable way. The IMEP reference laboratories must have demonstrated experience and have a proven and successful record in the use of primary methods of measurements (mainly isotope dilution mass spectrometry) and the application of uncertainty evaluation according to ISO/BIPM guidelines. In IMEP-9 "trace elements in water", results from 7 reference laboratories (including IRMM) were combined by IRMM to establish SI-traceable ranges for the 15 elements, which were then offered for measurement to the 200 participants worldwide. This paper does not discuss the individual contribution of the reference laboratories (this could be the subject of individual papers) but describes the procedures and criteria used in order to establish the reference ranges for the IMEP-9 samples by combining the individual contributions. All results submitted to IRMM are included, so as to make this publication as realistic as possible. Received: 31 December 1999 / Accepted: 7 March 2000     

IMEP-12: trace elements in water; objective evaluation of the performance of the laboratories when measuring quality parameters prescribed in the European Directive 98/83/EC

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme, founded, owned and co-ordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-12, for the fourth time in the series, focused on trace elements in water and it was designed specifically to support European Commission directive 98/83/EC. Reference values for the concentration of ten elements were established with expanded uncertainties according to GUM. In total, 348 laboratories from 46 countries in five continents participated in the comparison and the degree of equivalence between the results of the laboratories and the reference values is presented graphically. Samples from the same batch were distributed to ten laboratories from European Countries, which represented their country in the framework of the EUROMET project 528. Participation in this comparison was offered to the European Co-operation for Accreditation (EA) for participation of accredited laboratories from all over Europe in the framework of the collaboration between IRMM and EA and to laboratories from the EU new member states and acceding countries in the frame of IRMM’s ‘Metrology in Chemistry support program for EU new member states and acceding countries.’     

The IRMM – International Measurement Evaluation Programme,IMEP

 The aim of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to give an objective picture of the state-of-the-practice (SoP) of chemical measurements in field laboratories by comparing them to a reference range that contains a value that is as traceable to the SI system of measurements (in this case to the Avogadro Constant, one of the best realizations of the mole so far), as can presently be achieved, but which in any case is independent of human or political decision. Thus, a large-scale field test has been made to realize (international) comparability of these measurements by providing them with an independent scientific common basis. In the third measurement round, IMEP-3, ten trace elements, B, Ca, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Pb, Rb and Zn were measured in a synthetic and in a natural water by about 155 participating laboratories using their routine methods. The (coded) results are graphically reported and compared to certified reference values, established by IRMM and NIST, using isotope specific methods (isotope dilution mass spectrometry and neutron activation analysis), wherever possible. One of these methods (IDMS) has recently been defined as a primary method of measurement by the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance (Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière: CCQM) in its founding meeting in April 1995 at BIPM, Paris. Results indicate a spread of more than ±50%, asymmetrically distributed around the reference range, although the declared accuracy was 5–10%. Self-assessment by participants of their analytical capabilities does not show a high correlation between a self-rating ("more experienced" or "less experienced") and actual performance. In the way they have been applied, all methods seem to produce results of approximately the same quality. There is little reduction in the spread of the measurements if the results obtained for one element in the natural water B are divided by the results obtained for the same element in the synthetic water A (which was unknowingly, a reference material). Index entries International measurement evaluation programme (IMEP).     

International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP); IMEP-14: Picturing the performance of analytical laboratories measuring trace elements in sediment

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme founded, owned and co-ordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-14, for the first time in the series, is focusing on trace elements in sediment. Reference values for ten elements stating total concentrations and expanded uncertainties according to GUM were established. In total, 239 laboratories from 43 countries in five continents participated in the comparison, and the degree of equivalence between the results from the laboratories and the reference values is presented graphically. Identical samples were distributed to nine National Measurement Institutes within the frame of the CCQM-P15 pilot study. Participation in the IMEP-14 interlaboratory comparison was offered to laboratories in the EU new member states and acceding countries according to the IRMMs Metrology in Chemistry support programme for EU new member states and acceding countries.This revised version was published online in August 2004 with corrections to text especially to the Discussion section.     

Development of a certified reference material (NMIJ CRM 7505-a) for the determination of trace elements in tea leaves

A certified reference material (CRM) for trace elements in tea leaves has been developed in National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ). The CRM was provided as a dry powder (<90 μm) after frozen pulverization of washed and dried fresh tea leaves from a tea plant farm in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. Characterization of the property value for each element was carried out exclusively by NMIJ with at least two independent analytical methods, including inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), high-resolution (HR-) ICP-MS, isotope-dilution (ID-) ICP-MS, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS) and flame atomic-absorption spectrometry (FAAS). Property values were provided for 19 elements (Ca, K, Mg, P, Al, B, Ba, Cd, Cu, Fe, Li, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Zn and Co) and informative values for 18 elements (Ti, V, Cr, Y, and all of the lanthanides, except for Pm whose isotopes are exclusively radioactive). The concentration ranges of property values and informative values were from 1.59% (mass) of K to 0.0139 mg kg(-1) of Cd and from 0.6 mg kg(-1) of Ti to 0.0014 mg kg(-1) of Lu, respectively. Combined relatively standard uncertainties of the property values were estimated by considering the uncertainties of the homogeneity, analytical methods, characterization, calibration standard, and dry-mass correction factor. The range of the relative combined standard uncertainties was from 1.5% of Mg and K to 4.1% of Cd.     

IMEP in support of the comparability of measurement results across the Romanian chemical metrology infrastructure

On the basis of quantitative chemical measurements many important decisions are made in support of legislation or in industrial processes or social aspects. For this reason it is important to improve the quality of chemical measurement results and thus make them comparable and acceptable everywhere. The measurement quality is important to enable an equivalent implementation of the European Union regulations and directives across an enlarged EU. In this context, the European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Reference Materials and Measurement (EC-JRC-IRMM) set up a programme to improve the scientific basis for metrology in chemistry (MiC) in EU candidate countries in the framework of EU enlargement. Several activities were initiated, such as training, fellowships, sponsoring of seminars, conferences and participation in interlaboratory comparisons. To disseminate measurement traceability, IRMM provides through its International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) an interlaboratory tool to enable the benchmarking of laboratory performance. IMEP emphasizes the metrological aspects of measurement results, such as traceability and measurement uncertainty. In this way it has become a publicly available European tool for MiC. The Romanian Bureau of Legal Metrology – National Institute of Metrology (BRML-INM) actively supports the participation of Romanian authorized and field laboratories in IMEP interlaboratory comparisons. This paper describes the interest of Romanian laboratories participating in this programme, the analytical and metrological problems that became relevant during these exercises and some actions for improvement. The results from Romanian laboratories participating in IMEP-12 (water), IMEP-16 (wine), IMEP-17 (human serum) and IMEP-20 (tuna fish) are presented. To conclude, the educational and training activities at national level organized jointly by the Romanian National Institute of Metrology (INM) and IRMM are also mentioned.     

The IRMM International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) IMEP-4: Trace elements (Li, Cu, Zn) in serum

The aim of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to give an objective picture of state-of-the-practice analytical measurements by comparing them to a reference value obtained by a primary method of measurement. The referencevalue is therefore as traceable to the SI system of measurements as can presently be achieved and is independent of human or political decisions. Thus a large scale field test is made to achieve (international) comparability of measurements by comparing them with an independent metrologically established value. In the fourth measurement round, IMEP-4, three trace elements, Li, Cu and Zn, at three different levels in (bovine) serum were measured by about 12 participating laboratories using their routine methods. The (coded) results are graphically reported and compared to certified reference values established by an isotope-specific method, isotope dilution mass spectrometry, defined as a primary method of measurement by the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance. Results indicate a spread of more than ±50%, asymmetrically distributed around the reference value with its own uncertainty range, although the self-declared accuracy of the laboratories was 5–10%. Self-assessment by participants of their analytical capabilities does not show a high correlation between self-rating ("more experienced" or "less experienced") and actual performance. In the way they have been applied, all methods seem to produce results of approximately the same quality.     

Preparation of the bovine liver 12-02-01 reference material and the certification of element contents from an interlaboratory comparison

Summary The preparation of the bovine liver 12-02-01 reference material, its stabilization and homogeneity testing is presented. Evaluation of an interlaboratory comparison in which 31 laboratories took part using several analytical methods is described. From the results of the intercomparison, the contents of the elements Cd, Cu, Hg, Mn, Pb, Se, and Zn were certified, while for the elements Br, Co, Fe, K, Mo, Na, and Rb, information values were derived. Non-recommended values for the elements Ag, As, Ca, Cl, Cr, Cs, La, Mg, S, Sb, Sn, Sr, and V were also evaluated.Denoted as CZIM-liver in the report [23]     

Determination of lead, cadmium, zinc, copper, and iron in foods by atomic absorption spectrometry after microwave digestion: NMKL Collaborative Study

A method for determination of lead, cadmium, zinc, copper, and iron by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) after microwave digestion was subjected to a collaborative study in which 16 laboratories participated [including users of inductively coupled plasma (ICP) and ICP-mass spectrometry (MS)]. The types of samples included in the study were minced fish, wheat bran, milk powder, bovine and pig liver, mushroom, 2 simulated diets, and bovine muscle; the last 4 were certified reference materials. These were analyzed as single (4 samples), double blind (1 sample), or split level (2 samples) samples. Before the collaborative study, a pretrial was conducted in which 4 ready-made solutions and one fish tissue sample were analyzed for Pb and Cu. The reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values, for results above the detection limit, ranged from 59% at 0.155 mg/kg to 16% at 1.62 mg/kg for Pb, from 28% at 0.0124 mg/kg to 11% at 0.482 mg/kg for Cd, from 9.3% at 35.3 mg/kg to 1.7% at 147 mg/kg for Zn, from 39% at 0.241 mg/kg to 3.0% at 63.4 mg/kg for Cu, and from 17% at 7.4 mg/kg to 5.9% at 303 mg/kg for Fe. The RSDR values agreed well with the norms described by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. As a complement to the AAS determinations, a number of laboratories analyzed the samples either by ICP or by ICP-MS. The results of these analyses agreed well with the AAS results. On the basis of the results of the collaborative study, the method was adopted Official First Action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.     

Interlaboratory study of trace and other elements in the iaea powdered human hair reference material,HH-1

A powdered intercomparison material for trace element studies was prepared from human scalp hair and distributed to more than 100 laboratories of which 66 reported results for altogether more than 40 elements. By statistical evaluation of these data certified concentration values were derived for 20 elements, namely As, Au, Br, Ca, Cd, Cl, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mg, Mn, Na, Pb, S, Sb, Se, Sr and Zn. The data also made it possible to compare different methods of analysis and to judge the value of different levels of experience on the part of the analyst concerned; these comparisons are presented here with special reference to the elements As, Cd, Hg, Pb and Sb.     

不同年龄阶段儿童头发锌、铜、铅、镉含量比较

采用电位溶出法检测了９５３例正常儿童发锌,铜,铅,镉含量,得出深圳地区不同年龄组男,女儿童的正常参考值,同时对各元素进行了年龄组间及性别间的比较。结果显示,除发锌无显著性别差异外,男童发铜,铅,镉含量显著高于女童（Ｐ〈０．０５或Ｐ〈０．０１）,随着年龄的增长,儿童发锌含量逐渐上升,而发铜,铅,镉水平逐渐下降。     

Preparation and homogeneity characterization of ten agricultural/food reference materials for elemental composition

Summary Ten agricultural/food reference materials (RM): bovine muscle powder, corn starch, hard red spring wheat flour, soft winter wheat flour, whole milk powder, wheat gluten, corn bran, Durum wheat flour, whole egg powder and microcystalline cellulose, were prepared by milling, irradiation, sieving, blending and packaging procedures. Homogeneity tests for 14 elements in randomly selected units were performed by the initiating laboratories by application of various analytical methods. Al, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Sr and Zn were determined by acid digestion flame atomic absorption spectrometry, and Cd, Co, Ni and Pb using acid digestion graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry after separation/preconcentration of the analytes by co-precipitation. In addition, the extensive set of analytical results obtained from the interlaboratory cooperative characterization campaign was assessed to provide homogeneity estimates for other elements. Measures of homogeneity were estimated from the within-laboratory precision from the more precise laboratories. All materials exhibited acceptable homogeneity for virtually all 29 elements (Al, As, B, Ba, Br, Ca, Cd, Cl, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, I, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, N, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Rb, S, Se, Sr, V, Zn) for which best estimate concentration values were available, an essential pre-requisite in establishing reference values for these materials. Sixty-two percent of all homogeneity coefficients of variation (CV) were below 5%, with Br, Ca, Cl, Mg, Na, P, Zn and especially K and N exhibiting very high homogeneity CV less than 1% in some cases.Contribution no. 92–148 from Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research