The minimal generating space of a polynomial

Given a polynomial $\text{P(X}{}_1\text{,…,X}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{)∈}\text{R}\text{[}\text{X}\text{]}$, we calculate a subspace G_p of the linear space 〈X〉 generated by the indeterminates which is minimal with respect to the property $\text{P∈}\text{R}\text{[}\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{]}$ (the algebra generated by G_p, and prove its uniqueness. Furthermore, we use this result to characterize the pairs (P,Q) of polynomials P(X₁,…,X_n) and Q(X₁,…,X_n) for which there exists an isomorphism T:〈X〉 →〈X〉 that “separates P from Q,” i.e., such that for some k(1<k<n) we can write P and Q as $\text{P}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_1\text{,…,Y}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}$ and $\text{Q}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k+</mtext><mtext>1</mtext>}}\text{,…,Y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ respectively, where $\text{Y}\text{=T}\text{X}$.     

Strong law for the bootstrap

Let X₁, X₂, X₃, … be i.i.d. r.v. with E|X₁| < ∞, E X₁ = μ. Given a realization X = (X₁,X₂,…) and integers n and m, construct Y_n,i, i = 1, 2, …, m as i.i.d. r.v. with conditional distribution $\text{P}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}\text{= X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{) =}\text{1}\text{n}$ for 1 ? j ? n. ($\text{P}{}^1$ denotes conditional distribution given X). Conditions relating the growth rate of m with n and the moments of X₁ are given to ensure the almost sure convergence of $\text{(}\text{1}\text{m}\text{)Σ}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}$ toμ. This equation is of some relevance in the theory of Bootstrap as developed by Efron (1979) and Bickel and Freedman (1981).     

A transfer spectral sequence for fixed point free involutions with an application to stunted real projective spaces

We show that if X is a finite CW-complex admitting a fixed point free involution then there is a singly graded spectral sequence with $\text{E}{}^1{}_1\text{? H}{}^1\text{(X;}\text{Z}{}_2\text{)}$ and $\text{E}{}^1\text{∞ = 0}$. As an application we prove that for any n > 0 there is a natural number k(n) such that if n > k(n) and X is a homotopy $\text{R}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{n+k}}\text{R}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, then X will not admit a fixed point free involution.     

One-sided inequalities for ternary forms: II

For an indefinite quadratic form f(x₁, …, x_n) let P(f) denote the greatest lower bound of the positive values assumed by f for integers x₁, …, x_n. This paper investigates the values of $\text{P}{}^3\text{∥d∥}$ for nonzero ternary forms of signature ?1 and finds two new classes of forms with $\text{P}{}^3\text{∥d∥}\text{>}\text{1}\text{2}$.     

Elementary proof of the transformation formula for Lambert series involving generalized Dedekind sums

An elementary proof is given of the author's transformation formula for the Lambert series $\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(x) =}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n?1}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\infty </mtext>}}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{?p}}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(1?x}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ relating G_p(e^2πiτ) to G_p(e^2πiAτ), where p > 1 is an odd integer and $\text{Aτ =}\text{(aτ + b)}\text{(cτ + d)}$ is a general modular substitution. The method extends Sczech's argument for treating Dedekind's function $\text{log}\text{η(τ) =}\text{πiτ}\text{12}\text{? G}{}_1\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi i\tau }}\text{)}$, and uses Carlitz's formula expressing generalized Dedekind sums in terms of Eulerian functions.     

A Feynman-Kac gauge for solvability of the Schrödinger equation

Let {X_t, t ≥ 0} be Brownian motion in $\text{R}$^d (d ≥ 1). Let D be a bounded domain in $\text{R}$^d with C² boundary, ?D, and let q be a continuous (if d = 1), Hölder continuous (if d ≥ 2) function in D?. If the Feynman-Kac “gauge” E_x{exp(∝₀^τ_Dq(X_t)dt)1_A(X_τD)}, where τ_D is the first exit time from D, is finite for some non-empty open set A on ?D and some x?D, then for any $\text{? ? C}{}^0\text{(?D}$), is the unique solution in $\text{C}{}^2\text{(D) ∩ C}{}^0\text{(}\text{D}\text{?}\text{)}$ of the Schrödinger boundary value problem $\text{(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{Δ}\text{+ q)φ = 0}\text{in}\text{D, φ = ?}\text{on}\text{?D}$.     

Canonical forms for linear systems

This paper considers canonical forms for the similarity action of Gl(n) on $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}\text{={(A,B)∈}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{×}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{}}$:

$\text{Gl(n×∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}\text{→∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}$

,

$\text{(H,(A,B))?(HAH}{}^{-1}\text{,HB)}$

Those canonical forms are obtained as an application of a more general method to select canonical elements M_c in the orbits $\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}$ of a matrix group G acting on a set of matrices $\text{M}\text{?}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{l}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$. We define a total order (?) on $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{l}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, different from the lexicographic order ^l? [0^l?x ? x <0, but $\text{0?x≠0 for x∈}\text{R}\text{]}$ and consider normalized $\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}$-elements with a minimal number of parameters:

$\text{min{}\text{M}\text{?}\text{∈}\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{:}\text{M}\text{?}\text{normalized}}$

It is shown that the row and column echelon forms, the Jordan canonical form, and “nice” control canonical forms for reachable (A,B)-pairs have a homogeneous interpretation as such (?)-minimal orbit elements. Moreover new canonical forms for the general action (?) are determined via this method.     

On the number of zeros of diagonal cubic forms

Let M_s, be the number of solutions of the equation

$\text{X}{}_1{}^3\text{+ X}{}_2{}^3\text{+ … + X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^3\text{=0}$

in the finite field GF(p). For a prime p ≡ 1(mod 3),

$\text{∑}\text{s=1}\text{∞}\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{X}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{=}\text{x}\text{1 ? px}\text{+}\text{x}{}^2\text{(p ? 1)(2 + dx)}\text{1 ? 3px}{}^2\text{? pdx}{}^3$

,

$\text{M}{}_3\text{= p}{}^2\text{+ d(p ? 1)}$

, and

$\text{M}{}_4\text{= p}{}^2\text{+ 6(p}{}^2\text{? p)}$

. Here d is uniquely determined by

$\text{4}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{= d}{}^2\text{+ 27b}{}^2\text{and}\text{d ≡ 1(}\text{mod}\text{3)}$

.     

Cohérence différentielle des F-isocristaux unités

Let $\text{V}$ be a mixed characteristic complete discrete valuation ring, $\text{P}$ a smooth formal scheme over $\text{V}$, P its special fiber, X a smooth subscheme of P, T a divisor in P such that T_X=T∩X is a divisor in X and $\text{D}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>P</mtext>}}$ the weak completion of the sheaf of differential operators on $\text{P}$. We prove that the unit-root F-isocrystals on X?T_X overconvergent along T_X are coherent over $\text{D}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>P</mtext><mtext>,</mtext><mtext>Q</mtext>}}$. To cite this article: D. Caro, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 338 (2004).     

Inner functions in the unit ball of Cn

Let B be the open unit ball of $\text{C}$ⁿ, n > 1. Let I (for “inner”) be the set of all u ? H °(B) that have $\text{¦u¦ = 1}$ a.e. on the boundary S of B. Aleksandrov proved recently that there exist nonconstant u ? I. This paper strengthens his basic theorem and provides further information about I and the algebra Q generated by I. Let XY be the finite linear span of products xy, x ? X, y ? Y, and let $\text{¦X¦}$ be the norm closure, in L^∞ = L^∞(S), of X. Some results: set I is dense in the unit ball of H^∞(B) in the compact-open topology. On $\text{S,}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q}$ is weak¹-dense in $\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{, ¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q¦}$ does not contain $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{, C(S) ?¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦ ≠ ¦}\text{H}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦ ≠ L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$. (When $\text{n = 1, ¦Q¦ = H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{and}\text{¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q¦ = L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$.) Every unimodular $\text{?}\text{?}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ is a pointwise limit a.e. of products $\text{u}\text{v}\text{?}\text{, u}\text{?}\text{I, ν}\text{?}\text{I}$. The zeros of every $\text{? ? 0}$ in the ball algebra (but not of every H^∞-function) can be matched by those of some u ? I, as can any finite number of derivatives at 0 if $\text{∥?∥}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{< 1}$. However, $\text{?}\text{u}$ cannot be bounded in B if u ? I is non-constant.     

Sufficiency and invariance

Suppose that a statistical decision problem is invariant under a group of transformations g?G. T (X) is equivariant if there exists $\text{g}{}^1\text{? G}{}^1$ such that $\text{T(g(X)) = g}{}^1\text{(T((X))}$. We show that the minimal sufficient statistic is equivalent and that if T(X) is an equivariant sufficient statistics and d(X) is invariant under G, then $\text{d}{}^1\text{(T) = Ed(X)∥T}$ is invariant under $\text{G}{}^1$.     

Local asymptotic normality for progressively censored likelihood ratio statistics and applications

Let X_n,1 ≤ X_n,2 ≤ … ≤ X_n,n be the ordered variables corresponding to a random sample of size n with respect to a family of probability measures {P_θ:θ ∈ Θ} where Θ is an open subset of the real line. In many practical situations the X_n,i are the observables and experimentation must be curtailed prior to X_n,n. If τ_n is a stopping variable adapted to the σ-fields {σ(X_n,1,…,X_n,k): 1 ≤ k ≤ n} and P_n,θ the projection of P_θ onto σ(X_n,1,…,X_n,τn), the local asymptotic normality of the stopped progressively censored likelihood ratio statistics is established with θ, $\text{θ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= θ + un}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{∈ Θ}$ and θ, u held fixed, under certain conditions on the underlying distribution and on τ_n. Conditions are also given to ensure the local asymptotic normality of likelihood ratio statistics where the underlying observations are given in a series scheme.     

Zeta matrices of elliptic curves

Let $\text{O =}\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{Z/p}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{Z}$, let $\text{A}\text{= O[g}{}_2\text{, g}{}_3\text{]}{}_{\mathrm{\Delta }}$, where g₂ and g₃ are coefficients of the elliptic curve: Y² = 4X³ ? g₂X ? g₃ over a finite field and Δ = g₂³ ? 27g₃² and let $\text{B}\text{=}\text{A}\text{[X, Y]}\text{(Y}{}^2\text{? 4X}{}^3\text{+ g}{}_2\text{X + g}{}_3\text{)}$. Then the p-adic cohomology theory will be applied to compute explicitly the zeta matrices of the elliptic curves, induced by the pth power map on the free $\text{A}{}^2\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{Z}}\text{Q}$-module $\text{H}{}^1\text{(X,}\text{A}{}^2\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{Z}}\text{Q)}$. Main results are; Theorem 1.1: X²dY and YdX are basis elements for $\text{H}{}^1\text{(}\text{X}\text{, Γ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>A</mtext>}}{}^1\text{(}\text{X}\text{)}{}^2\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{Z}}\text{Q)}$; Theorem 1.2: YdX, X²dY, Y^?1dX, Y^?2dX and XY^?2dX are basis elements for $\text{H}{}^1\text{(}\text{X}\text{? (Y = 0), Γ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>A</mtext>}}{}^1\text{(}\text{X}\text{)}{}^2\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{Z}}\text{Q)}$, where $\text{X}$ is a lifting of X, and all the necessary recursive formulas for this explicit computation are given.     

Projections on spaces of invariant functions

Let (X, ∑, μ) be a measure space and S be a semigroup of measure-preserving transformations T:X → X. In case μ(X) < ∞, Aribaud [1] proved the existence of a positive contractive projection P of L¹(μ) such that for every $\text{? ? L}{}^1\text{(μ), Pf}$ belongs to the closure $\text{C}{}_1\text{(?)}\text{in}\text{L}{}^1\text{(μ)}$ of the convex hull $\text{C(?)}$ of the set {$\text{? ○ T:T ? S}$}. In this paper we extend this result in three directions: we consider infinite measure spaces, vector-valued functions, and L^p spaces with 1 ? p < ∞, and prove that P is in fact the conditional expectation with respect to the σ-algebra Λ of sets of ∑ which are invariant with respect to all T?S.     

On the square root of a positive B(X,X1)-valued function

Let (Ω, $\text{B}$, μ) be a measure space, $\text{X}$ a separable Banach space, and $\text{X}$¹ the space of all bounded conjugate linear functionals on $\text{X}$. Let f be a weak¹ summable positive B($\text{X, X}$¹)-valued function defined on Ω. The existence of a separable Hilbert space $\text{K}$, a weakly measurable B($\text{X, K}$)-valued function Q satisfying the relation $\text{Q}{}^1\text{(ω)Q(ω) = f(ω)}$ is proved. This result is used to define the Hilbert space L_2,f of square integrable operator-valued functions with respect to f. It is shown that for B⁺($\text{X, X}$¹)-valued measures, the concepts of weak¹, weak, and strong countable additivity are all the same. Connections with stochastic processes are explained.     

Duality theorems for linear systems and convex systems

We show that, if (F →^uX) is a linear system, $\text{Ω ? X}$ a convex target set and $\text{h: X →}\text{R}\text{?}$ a convex functional, then, under suitable assumptions, the computation of inf $\text{h({y ? F ¦ u(y) ? Ω}}$) can be reduced to the computation of the infimum of h on certain strips or hyperplanes in F, determined by elements of $\text{u}{}^1\text{(X}{}^1\text{)}$, or of the infima on F of Lagrangians, involving elements of $\text{u}{}^1\text{(X}{}^1\text{)}$. Also, we prove similar results for a convex system (F →^uX) and the convex cone Ω of all non-positive elements in X.     

How many ways can a permutation be factored into two n-cycles?

A recursion is developed for the number $\text{?;(P)}$ of ways a permutation P on n symbols can be written as a product of two n-cycles. It is known that $\text{?(P) > 0}$ if and only if P is an even permutation. It is shown here that $\text{?(P)}\text{(n?1)!}\text{=}\text{?(Q)}\text{(m?1)!}$ if P has trivial cycles but the same nontrivial cycle structure as a permutation Q on m symbols, while $\text{1 ? ?(P)}\text{(n?2)! ?}{}^7{}_3$ if P is even and has no trivial cycles. Additional evidence strongly suggests $\text{?(P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(n?2)! → 2}\text{/}$ as n → ∞ for any sequence of even P_n on n symbols without trivial cycles. Some connections with Hamiltonian cycles in a random graph and the group structure of the symmetric group are noted.     

Minimax estimation of location parameters for certain spherically symmetric distributions

Families of minimax estimators are found for the location parameters of a p-variate distribution of the form

, where G(·) is a known c.d.f. on (0, ∞), p ≥ 3 and the loss is sum of squared errors. The estimators are of the form $\text{(1 ? ar(X′X)}\text{E}{}_0\text{(}\text{1}\text{X′X}\text{)X′X)X}$ where 0 ≤ a ≤ 2, r(X′X) is nondecreasing, and $\text{r(X′X)}\text{X′X}$ is nonincreasing. Generalized Bayes minimax estimators are found for certain G(·)'s.     

Three problems on the lengths of increasing runs

Let U₁, U₂,… be a sequence of independent, uniform (0, 1) r.v.'s and let R₁, R₂,… be the lengths of increasing runs of {U_i}, i.e., X₁=R₁=inf{i:U_i+1<U_i},…, X_n=R₁+R₂+?+R_n=inf{i:i>X_n?1,U_i+1<U_i}. The first theorem states that the sequence $\text{(}\text{3}\text{2}\text{n)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?2n)}$ can be approximated by a Wiener process in strong sense.Let τ(n) be the largest integer for which R₁+R₂+?+R_τ(n)?n, $\text{R}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=n?(R}{}_1\text{+R}{}_2\text{+?+R}{}_{\mathrm{\tau (n)}}\text{)}$ and $\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{max}\text{{R}{}_1\text{,R}{}_2\text{,…,R}{}_{\mathrm{\tau (n)}}\text{,R}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}$. Here M_n is the length of the longest increasing block. A strong theorem is given to characterize the limit behaviour of M_n.The limit distribution of the lengths of increasing runs is our third problem.