On weighted Shapley values

Nonsymmetric Shapley values for coalitional form games with transferable utility are studied. The nonsymmetries are modeled through nonsymmetric weight systems defined on the players of the games. It is shown axiomatically that two families of solutions of this type are possible. These families are strongly related to each other through the duality relationship on games. While the first family lends itself to applications of nonsymmetric revenue sharing problems the second family is suitable for applications of cost allocation problems. The intersection of these two families consists essentially of the symmetric Shapley value. These families are also characterized by a probabilistic arrival time to the game approach. It is also demonstrated that lack of symmetries may arise naturally when players in a game represent nonequal size constituencies.     

On the serial cost sharing rule

In this paper we study a solution for discrete cost allocation problems, namely, the serial cost sharing method. We show that this solution can be computed by applying the Shapley value to an appropriate TU game and we present a probabilistic formula. We also define for cost allocation problems a multilinear function in order to obtain the serial cost sharing method as Owen (1972) did for the Shapley value in the cooperative TU context. Moreover we show that the pseudo average cost method is equivalent to an extended Shapley value. Received April 2000/Revised January 2003 RID="*" ID="*"  Authors are indebted to two anonymous referees for especially careful and useful comments. This research has been partially supported by the University of the Basque Country (projects UPV 036.321-HA197/98, UPV 036.321-HA042/99) and DGES Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (project PB96-0247).     

Weighted Aumann-Shapley pricing

Cost allocation problems arise in many contexts in economics and management science. In a typical problem that we have in mind, a decision maker must decide how to allocate the joint cost of production among several commodities using prices. Furthermore, these prices must satisfy certain reasonable postulates among which is the requirement that total revenue associated with these prices must cover total cost. In this paper, we investigate a generalization of Aumann-Shapley pricing, called Weighted Aumann-Shapley pricing, that allows for asymmetric pricing of commodities even when those commodities affect costs in a symmetric fashion. Weighted AS pricing is a natural extension of (symmetric) Aumann-Shapley pricing, and may be considered a non-atomic analogue of Owen's modified diagonal formula (with respect to the multilinear extension) for the weighted TU Shapley Value. Received December 1993/Revised version June 1998     

Multilinear extensions and values for multichoice games

We define multilinear extensions for multichoice games and relate them to probabilistic values and semivalues. We apply multilinear extensions to show that the Banzhaf value for a compound multichoice game is not the product of the Banzhaf values of the component games, in contrast to the behavior in simple games. Following Owen (Manag Sci 18:64–79, 1972), we integrate the multilinear extension over a simplex to construct a version of the Shapley value for multichoice games. We compare this new Shapley value to other extensions of the Shapley value to multichoice games. We also show how the probabilistic value (resp. semivalue, Banzhaf value, Shapley value) of a multichoice game is equal to the probabilistic value (resp. semivalue, Banzhaf value, Shapley value) of an appropriately defined TU decomposition game. Finally, we explain how semivalues, probabilistic values, the Banzhaf value, and this Shapley value may be viewed as the probability that a player makes a difference to the outcome of a simple multichoice game.     

An axiomatization of probabilistic Owen value for games with coalition structure

In the framework of games with coalition structure, we introduce probabilistic Owen value which is an extension of the Owen value and probabilistic Shapley value by considering the situation that not all priori unions are able to cooperate with others. Then we use five axioms of probabilistic efficiency, symmetric within coalitions, symmetric across coalitions applying to unanimity games, strong monotone property and linearity to axiomatize the value.     

Highway toll pricing

For a tolled highway where consecutive segments allow vehicles to enter and exit unrestrictedly, we propose a simple toll pricing method. It is shown that the method is the unique method satisfying the classical axioms of Additivity and Dummy in the cost sharing literature, and the axioms of Toll Upper Bound for Local Traffic and Routing-proofness. We also show that the toll pricing method is the only method satisfying Routing-proofness Axiom and Cost Recovery Axiom. The main axiom in the characterizations is Routing-proofness which says that no vehicle can reduce its toll charges by exiting and re-entering intermediately. In the special case when there is only one unit of traffic (vehicle) for each (feasible) pair of entrance and exit, we show that our toll pricing method is the Shapley value of an associated game to the problem. In the case when there is one unit of traffic entering at each entrance but they all exit at the last exit, our toll pricing method coincides with the well-known airport landing fee solution-the Sequential Equal Contribution rule of Littlechild and Owen (1973).     

On the symmetric and weighted shapley values

We present new axiomatic characterizations of the symmetric Shapley value and of weighted Shapley values for transferable utility coalitional form games without imposing the axiom ofadditivity (Shapley [1953a,b]). Our main condition iscoalitional strategic equivalence, introduced by Chun [1989]. We show thatcoalitional strategic equivalence, together withefficiency, andsymmetry, characterizes the symmetric Shapley value, and this axiom, together withefficiency, positivity, homogeneity, andpartnership, characterizes weighted Shapley values.     

“Procedural” values for cooperative games

This paper introduces a new notion of a “procedural” value for cooperative TU games. A procedural value is determined by an underlying procedure of sharing marginal contributions to coalitions formed by players joining in random order. We consider procedures under which players can only share their marginal contributions with their predecessors in the ordering, and study the set of all resulting values. The most prominent procedural value is, of course, the Shapley value obtaining under the simplest procedure of every player just retaining his entire marginal contribution. But different sharing rules lead to other interesting values, including the “egalitarian solution” and the Nowak and Radzik “solidarity value”. All procedural values are efficient, symmetric and linear. Moreover, it is shown that these properties together with two very natural monotonicity postulates characterize the class of procedural values. Some possible modifications and generalizations are also discussed. In particular, it is shown that dropping one of monotonicity axioms is equivalent to allowing for sharing marginal contributions with both predecessors and successors in the ordering.     

The asymptotic core,nucleolus and Shapley value of smooth market games with symmetric large players

We examine the asymptotic nucleolus of a smooth and symmetric oligopoly with an atomless sector in a transferable utility (TU) market game. We provide sufficient conditions for the asymptotic core and the nucleolus to coincide with the unique TU competitive payoff distribution. This equivalence results from nucleolus of a finite TU market game belonging to its core, the core equivalence in a symmetric oligopoly with identical atoms and single-valuedness of the core in the limiting smooth game. In some cases (but not always), the asymptotic Shapley value is more favourable for the large traders than the nucleolus, in contrast to the monopoly case (Einy et al. in J Econ Theory 89(2):186–206, 1999), where the nucleolus allocation is larger than the Shapley value for the atom.     

Associated consistency and values for TU games

In the framework of the solution theory for cooperative transferable utility games, Hamiache axiomatized the well-known Shapley value as the unique one-point solution verifying the inessential game property, continuity, and associated consistency. The purpose of this paper is to extend Hamiache’s axiomatization to the class of efficient, symmetric, and linear values, of which the Shapley value is the most important representative. For this enlarged class of values, explicit relationships to the Shapley value are exploited in order to axiomatize such values with reference to a slightly adapted inessential game property, continuity, and a similar associated consistency. The latter axiom requires that the solutions of the initial game and its associated game (with the same player set, but a different characteristic function) coincide.     

The equivalence of uniform and Shapley value-based cost allocations in a specific game

This paper concerns the possible equivalence of the Shapley value and other allocations in specific games. For a group buying game with a linear quantity discount schedule, the uniform allocation results in the same cost allocation as the Shapley value. In this paper, we explore whether the Shapley axioms can be used to make such connections. We also characterize the functions that result in the equivalence of these two allocations among the class of polynomial total cost functions.     

Monotonic solutions of cooperative games

The principle of monotonicity for cooperative games states that if a game changes so that some player's contribution to all coalitions increases or stays the same then the player's allocation should not decrease. There is a unique symmetric and efficient solution concept that is monotonic in this most general sense — the Shapley value. Monotonicity thus provides a simple characterization of the value without resorting to the usual “additivity” and “dummy” assumptions, and lends support to the use of the value in applications where the underlying “game” is changing, e.g. in cost allocation problems.     

A note on associated consistency and linear,symmetric values

In the context of cooperative games with transferable utility Hamiache (Int J Game Theory 30:279–289, 2001) utilized continuity, the inessential game property and associated consistency to axiomatize the well-known Shapley value (Ann Math Stud 28:307–317, 1953). The question then arises: “Do there exist linear, symmetric values other than the Shapley value that satisfy associated consistency?”. In this Note we give an affirmative answer to this question by showing that a linear, symmetric value satisfies associated consistency if and only if it is a linear combination of the Shapley value and the equal-division solution. In addition, we offer an explicit formula for generating all such solutions and show how the structure of the null space of the Shapley value contributes to its unique position in Hamiache’s result.     

A Shapley function on a class of cooperative fuzzy games

In this paper, we make a study of the Shapley values for cooperative fuzzy games, games with fuzzy coalitions, which admit the representation of rates of players' participation to each coalition. A Shapley function has been introduced by another author as a function which derives the Shapley value from a given pair of a fuzzy game and a fuzzy coalition. However, the previously proposed axioms of the Shapley function can be considered unnatural. Furthermore, the explicit form of the function has been given only on an unnatural class of fuzzy games. We introduce and investigate a more natural class of fuzzy games. Axioms of the Shapley function are renewed and an explicit form of the Shapley function on the natural class is given. We make sure that the obtained Shapley value for a fuzzy game in the natural class has several rational properties. Finally, an illustrative example is given.     

Whose deletion does not affect your payoff? The difference between the Shapley value, the egalitarian value, the solidarity value, and the Banzhaf value

This study provides a unified axiomatic characterization method of one-point solutions for cooperative games with transferable utilities. Any one-point solution that satisfies efficiency, the balanced cycle contributions property (BCC), and the axioms related to invariance under a player deletion is characterized as a corollary of our general result. BCC is a weaker requirement than the well-known balanced contributions property. Any one-point solution that is both symmetric and linear satisfies BCC. The invariance axioms necessitate that the deletion of a specific player from games does not affect the other players’ payoffs, and this deletion is different with respect to solutions. As corollaries of the above characterization result, we are able to characterize the well-known one-point solutions, the Shapley, egalitarian, and solidarity values, in a unified manner. We also studied characterizations of an inefficient one-point solution, the Banzhaf value that is a well-known alternative to the Shapley value.     

Network flow problems with pricing decisions

This paper considers a class of network flow problems in which the demand levels of the nodes are determined through pricing decisions representing the revenue received per unit demand at the nodes. We must simultaneously determine the pricing decisions and the network flow decisions in order to maximize profits, i.e., the revenues received from the pricing decisions minus the cost of the network flow decisions. Specializations of this class of problems have numerous applications in supply chain management. We show that the class of problems with a single pricing decision throughout the network can be solved in polynomial time under both continuous pricing restrictions and integer pricing restrictions. For the class of problems with customer-specific pricing decisions, we provide conditions under which the problem can be solved in polynomial-time for continuous pricing restrictions and prove that the problem is NP-hard for integer pricing restrictions.     

Random order coalition structure values

Recently, attention has been focused on generalizations of the Shapley value obtained by relaxing the symmetry postulate. Shapley defined the class of weighted values and these have been characterized by Kalai and Samet. Random order values, treated by Weber, provide the most general approach to values without symmetry. This paper extends the random order idea to games with coalition structures. The symmetric CS value was defined by Owen; axiomatic characterizations have been given by Owen and Hart and Kurz. Levy and McLean extended their work and analyzed various classes of weighted CS values. The random order CS values of this paper include all the CS values described above as special cases.     

Two Approaches to the Problem of Sharing Delay Costs in Joint Projects

This paper concentrates on cost sharing situations which arise when delayed joint projects involve joint delay costs. The problem here is to determine fair shares for each of the agents who contribute to the delay of the project such that the total delay cost is cleared. We focus on the evaluation of the responsibility of each agent in delaying the project based on the activity graph representation of the project and then on solving the important problem of the delay cost sharing among the agents involved. Two approaches, both rooted in cooperative game theory methods are presented as possible solutions. In the first approach delay cost sharing rules are introduced which are based on the delay of the project and on the individual delays of the agents who perform activities. This approach is inspired by the bankruptcy and taxation literature and leads to five rules: the (truncated) proportional rule, the (truncated) constrained equal reduction rule and the constrained equal contribution rule. By introducing two coalitional games related to delay cost sharing problems, which we call the pessimistic delay game and the optimistic delay game, also game theoretical solutions as the Shapley value, the nucleolus and the -value generate delay cost sharing rules. In the second approach the delays of the relevant paths in the activity graph together with the delay of the project play a role. A two-stage solution is proposed. The first stage can be seen as a game between paths, where the delay cost of the project has to be allocated to the paths. Here serial cost sharing methods play a role. In the second stage the allocated costs of each path are divided proportionally to the individual delays among the activities in the path.     

SHARING THE BENEFITS OF COOPERATION IN HIGH SEAS FISHERIES: A CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION GAME APPROACH

In the current paper we examine a game-theoretic setting in which three countries have established a regional organization for the conservation and management of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks. A characteristic function game approach is applied to describe the sharing of the surplus benefits from cooperation. We demonstrate that the nucleolus and the Shapley value give more of the benefits to the coalition with substantial bargaining power than does the Nash bargaining scheme. We also compare the results that are obtained by using the nucleolus and the Shapley value as solution concepts. The outcomes from these solution concepts depend on the relative efficiency of the most efficient coalition. Furthermore, the question of fair sharing of the benefits is considered in the context of straddling stocks.