Niob- und Tantalkomplexe mit P2- und P4-Liganden

Niobium and Tantalum Complexes with P₂ and P₄ Ligands The photolysis of [Cp″Ta(CO)₄] 1 (Cp″ = C₅H₃^tBu₂?1,3) and P₄ affords Cp″(CO)₂Ta(η⁴?P₄) 2 , [{Cp″(CO)Ta}₂(m??η^2:2?P₂)₂] 3 and [Cp₃″(CO)₃Ta₃(P₂)₂] 4 . In a photochemical reaction 2 and [Cp*Nb(CO)₄] 5 form [{Cp*(CO)Nb}{Cp″(CO)Ta}(m??η^2:2?P₂)₂] 6 and [{Cp*(CO)₂Nb} {Cp*Nb}{Cp″(CO)Ta}(m?₃?η^2:1:1?P₂)₂] 7 , a compound with the novel m?₃?η^2:2:1?P₂-coordination mode. The reaction of 2 and [Cp*Co(C₂H₄)₂] 8 leads to [{Cp*Co} {Cp″(CO)Ta}(m??η^2:2?P₂)₂] 9 , a heteronuclear complex with an ?early”? and a ?late”? transition metal. Complexes 2, 3, 7 and 9 have been further characterized by X-ray structure analyses.     

Mehrkernige Eisen/Tantal‐ und Tantal‐Komplexe mit Asn‐Liganden

Polynuclear Iron/Tantalum and Tantalum Complexes with As_n Ligands Starting with [Cp@Ta(CO)₄] ( 1 ) (Cp@ = C₅H₃^tBu₂‐1,3) and As₄ or (^tBuAs)₄ ( 2 ) its thermolysis at 190 °C in decalin gives [{Cp@Ta}₂(μ‐η⁴ : η⁴‐As₈)] ( 3 ), which is also formed according to equation (2) in addition to [{Cp@Ta}₃As₆] ( 5 ). The reaction of 1 or [{Cp*(OC)₂Fe}₂] ( 6 ) with 3 affords 5 or [{Cp*Fe}{Cp@Ta}As₅] ( 8 ) demonstrating the use of 3 as As_n source. 8 can also be synthesized from 1 and [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 7 ) for which the cothermolysis of 2 and 6 gives a better yield.     

Iodination of cyclo‐E5‐Complexes (E=P,As)

In a high‐yield one‐pot synthesis, the reactions of [Cp*M(η⁵‐P₅)] (M=Fe ( 1 ), Ru ( 2 )) with I₂ resulted in the selective formation of [Cp*MP₆I₆]⁺ salts ( 3 , 4 ). The products comprise unprecedented all‐cis tripodal triphosphino‐cyclotriphosphine ligands. The iodination of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 6 ) gave, in addition to [Fe(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ salts of the rare [As₆I₈]^2? (in 7 ) and [As₄I₁₄]^2? (in 8 ) anions, the first di‐cationic Fe‐As triple decker complex [(Cp*Fe)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈] ( 9 ). In contrast, the iodination of [Cp*Ru(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 10 ) did not result in the full cleavage of the M?As bonds. Instead, a number of dinuclear complexes were obtained: [(Cp*Ru)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈]_0.5 ( 11 ) represents the first Ru‐As₅ triple decker complex, thus completing the series of monocationic complexes [(Cp^RM)₂(μ,η^5:5‐E₅)]⁺ (M=Fe, Ru; E=P, As). [(Cp*Ru)₂As₈I₆] ( 12 ) crystallizes as a racemic mixture of both enantiomers, while [(Cp*Ru)₂As₄I₄] ( 13 ) crystallizes as a symmetric and an asymmetric isomer and features a unique tetramer of {AsI} arsinidene units as a middle deck.     

Functionalization of a cyclo‐P5 Ligand by Main‐Group Element Nucleophiles

Unprecedented functionalized products with an η⁴‐P₅ ring are obtained by the reaction of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] ( 1 ; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with different nucleophiles. With LiCH₂SiMe₃ and LiNMe₂, the monoanionic products [Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅CH₂SiMe₃)]^? and [Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅NMe₂)]^?, respectively, are formed. The reaction of 1 with NaNH₂ leads to the formation of the trianionic compound [{Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅)}₂N]^3?, whereas the reaction with LiPH₂ yields [Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅PH₂)]^? as the main product, with {[Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅)]₂PH}^2? as a byproduct. The calculated energy profile of the reactions provides a rationale for the formation of the different products.     

Size-determining dependencies in supramolecular organometallic host-guest chemistry

Treatment of the pentaphosphaferrocene [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] with Cu^I halides in the presence of different templates leads to novel fullerene‐like spherical molecules that serve as hosts for the templates. If ferrocene is used as the template the 80‐vertex ball [Cp₂Fe]@[{Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂{CuCl}₂₀] ( 4 ), with an overall icosahedral C₈₀ topological symmetry, is obtained. This result shows the ability of ferrocene to compete successfully with the internal template of the reaction system [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)], although the 90‐vertex ball [{Cp*Fe(η⁵:η¹:η¹:η¹:η¹:η¹‐P₅)}₁₂(CuCl)₁₀(Cu₂Cl₃)₅{Cu(CH₃CN)₂}₅] ( 2 a ) containing pentaphosphaferrocene as a guest is also formed as a byproduct. With use of the triple‐decker sandwich complex [(CpCr)₂(μ,η⁵‐As₅)] as a template the reaction between [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] and CuBr leads to the 90‐vertex ball [(CpCr)₂(μ,η⁵‐As₅)]@[{Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂{CuBr}₁₀{Cu₂Br₃}₅{Cu(CH₃CN)₂}₅] ( 6 ), in which the complete molecule acts as a template. However, if the corresponding reaction is instead carried out with CuCl, cleavage of the triple‐decker complex is found and the 80‐vertex ball [CpCr(η⁵‐As₅)]@[{Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂{CuCl}₂₀] ( 5 ) is obtained. This accommodates as its guest [CpCr(η⁵‐As₅)], which has only 16 valence electrons in a triplet ground state and is not known as a free molecule. The triple‐decker sandwich complex [(CpCr)₂(μ,η⁵‐As₅)] requires 53.1 kcal mol^?1 to undergo cleavage (as calculated by DFT methods) and therefore this reaction is clearly endothermic. All new products have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. A favoured orientation of the guest molecules inside the host cages has been identified, which shows π???π stacking of the five‐membered rings (Cp and cyclo‐As₅) of the guests and the cyclo‐P₅ rings of the nanoballs of the hosts.     

Cyclopentadienyl Dicarbonyl Iron‐Bismuth Compounds – Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity

Abstract. The cyclopentadienyl‐substituted iron‐bismuth complexes [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiCl₂] ( 1 ), [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 2 ), [{Cp′′(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 3 ) and [{Cp*(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 4 ) were prepared with high yields starting from [Cp^x(CO)₂Fe]₂ [Cp^x = C₅H₅ (Cp), C₅H₃‐1, 3‐tBu₂ (Cp′′), C₅Me₅ (Cp*)] and the corresponding bismuth halides. The single crystal X‐ray structure analyses of compounds 2 – 4 are reported. Comparison of their solubility demonstrates that the steric hindrance in this type of compounds is only slightly higher for compound 3 compared with compound 2 but significantly lower compared with the Cp* derivative 4 . Compounds 1 – 4 react with nucleophililic reagents such as KOtBu, NaOCH₂CH₂OCH₃, and NaOSiMe₃ as well as with water in the presence of an amine to give a mixture of [{Cp^x(CO)₂Fe}BiX] (X = Cl, Br) and [{Cp^x(CO)₂Fe}₃Bi]. In case of a reaction with nBu₄NCl and DMAP (dimethylaminopyridine) no such dismutation is observed. Instead the complexes [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂(DMAP)₂] ( 5 ), [NnBu₄]₂[{{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₃}₂] ( 6 ) and [NnBu₄]₂[{{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiCl₃}₂] ( 7 ) were isolated and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Structures and Properties of Spherical 90‐Vertex Fullerene‐Like Nanoballs

By applying the proper stoichiometry of 1:2 to [Cp^RFe(η⁵‐P₅)] and CuX (X=Cl, Br) and dilution conditions in mixtures of CH₃CN and solvents like CH₂Cl₂, 1,2‐Cl₂C₆H₄, toluene, and THF, nine spherical giant molecules having the simplified general formula [Cp^RFe(η⁵‐P₅)]@[{Cp^RFe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂{CuX}₂₅(CH₃CN)₁₀] (Cp^R=η⁵‐C₅Me₅ (Cp*); η⁵‐C₅Me₄Et (Cp^Et); X=Cl, Br) have been synthesized and structurally characterized. The products consist of 90‐vertex frameworks consisting of non‐carbon atoms and forming fullerene‐like structural motifs. Besides the mostly neutral products, some charged derivatives have been isolated. These spherical giant molecules show an outer diameter of 2.24 (X=Cl) to 2.26 nm (X=Br) and have inner cavities of 1.28 (X=Cl) and 1.20 nm (X=Br) in size. In most instances the inner voids of these nanoballs encapsulate one molecule of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)], which reveals preferred orientations of π–π stacking between the cyclo‐P₅ rings of the guest and those of the host molecules. Moreover, π–π and σ–π interactions are also found in the packing motifs of the balls in the crystal lattice. Electrochemical investigations of these soluble molecules reveal one irreversible multi‐electron oxidation at E_p=0.615 V and two reduction steps (?1.10 and ?2.0 V), the first of which corresponds to about 12 electrons. Density functional calculations reveal that during oxidation and reduction the electrons are withdrawn or added to the surface of the spherical nanomolecules, and no Cu²⁺ species are involved.     

Untersuchungen zur P–P‐Bindungsknüpfung in der Koordinationssphäre von Übergangsmetallen

Investigations of P–P Bond Formation Reactions in the Coordination Sphere of Transition Metals The reaction of [CpW(CO)₃]^– with PCl₃ leads to the transition metal substituted dichlorphosphines [{CpW(CO)₃}PCl₂] ( 1 ) and [{Cp(CO)₃W}PCl₂{WCl(CO)₂Cp}] ( 2 ). The X‐ray structure of 2 reveals the Lewis acid/base character of this compound. Reactions of 1 and [Cr(CO)₅Cp*PCl₂], respectively, with metalates of the type [M(CO)₃Cp′]^– (M′ = Mo, W; Cp′ = η⁵‐C₅H₄tBu) afford the cyclo‐P₃ complexes [(η³‐P₃)MCp′(CO)₃] ( 3 ) (M = W) and ( 4 ) (M = Mo) and the compounds [(μ,η²‐P₂{Cr(CO)₅}₂){Mo(CO)₂Cp}₂] ( 5 ) and [{μ₃‐PW(CO)₃Cp′}{W(CO)₂Cp′}₂] ( 6 ), respectively. Complex 6 possesses a planar homoleptic W₃P moiety revealing delocalised multiple bonds within the W₂P‐subunit. Reducing [(CO)₅WPCl₃] with magnesium leads to the formation of the phosphinidene complex [{(CO)₅W}₂PCl], whereas the reduction of [CpW(CO)₃PCl₂] ( 1 ) with magnesium yields the cyclo‐P₃ complex 3 together with P₄ phosphorus.     

[{Cp″Co}3(μ3-P)(μ3-PSe)], ein Dreikerncluster mit einem PSe-Liganden

[{Cp″Co}₃(μ₃-P)(μ₃-PSe)], a Trinuclear Cluster with a PSe Ligand The cothermolysis of [Cp″Co(CO)₂] ( 1 ), Cp″ = C₅H₃Bu-1.3, and P₄ gives besides [{Cp″Co}₃(μ₃-P)₂] ( 2 ) the cobalt P_n complexes [{Cp″Co}₄(μ₃-P)₄] ( 3 ) and [{Cp″Co}₂(μ, η^2:2-P₂)₂] ( 4 ). 2 can be oxidized with grey selenium forming [{Cp″Co}₃(μ₃-P)(μ₃-PSe)] ( 5 ) and [{Cp″Co}₃(μ₃-PSe)₂] ( 6 ), complexes with the hitherto unknown PSe ligand. The crystal structure of 5 reveals a trigonal-bipyramidal Co₃P₂ skeleton with one μ₃-PSe ligand.     

μ3‐η2:η2:η2‐Coordination of Primary Silane on a Triruthenium Plane

A μ₃‐η²:η²:η²‐silane complex, [(Cp*Ru)₃(μ₃‐η²:η²:η²‐H₃SitBu)(μ‐H)₃] ( 2 a ; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅), was synthesized from the reaction of [{Cp*Ru(μ‐H)}₃(μ₃‐H)₂] ( 1 ) with tBuSiH₃. Complex 2 a is the first example of a silane ligand adopting a μ₃‐η²:η²:η² coordination mode. This unprecedented coordination mode was established by NMR and IR spectroscopy as well as X‐ray diffraction analysis and supported by a density functional study. Variable‐temperature NMR analysis implied that 2 a equilibrates with a tautomeric μ₃‐silyl complex ( 3 a ). Although 3 a was not isolated, the corresponding μ₃‐silyl complex, [(Cp*Ru)₃(μ₃‐η²:η²‐H₂SiPh)(H)(μ‐H)₃] ( 3 b ), was obtained from the reaction of 1 with PhSiH₃. Treatment of 2 a with PhSiH₃ resulted in a silane exchange reaction, leading to the formation of 3 b accompanied by the elimination of tBuSiH₃. This result indicates that the μ₃‐silane complex can be regarded as an “arrested” intermediate for the oxidative addition/reductive elimination of a primary silane to a trinuclear site.     

[CpR(OC)Mo(μ‐η2:2‐P2)2FeCpR′] als Edukt für heterobimetallische Zweikerncluster mit P2‐ und CnRnP4‐n‐Liganden (n = 1, 2)

[Cp^R(OC)Mo(μ‐η^2:2‐P₂)₂FeCp^R′] as Educt for Heterobimetallic Dinuclear Clusters with P₂ and C_nR_nP_4‐n Ligands (n = 1, 2) The cothermolysis of [Cp^R(OC)Mo(μ‐η^2:2‐P₂)₂FeCp^R′] ( 1 ) and tBuC≡P ( 2 ) as well as PhC≡CPh ( 3 ) affords the heterobimetallic triple‐decker like dinuclear clusters [(Cp'''Mo)(Cp*′Fe)(P₃CtBu)(P₂)] ( 4 ), Cp''' = C₅H₂tBu₃‐1,2,4, Cp*′ = C₅Me₄Et, and [(Cp*Mo)(Cp*Fe)(P₂C₂Ph₂)(P₂)] ( 5 ) with a bridging tri‐ and diphosphabutadiendiyl ligand. 4 and 5 have been characterized additionally by X‐ray crystallography.     

Molekül‐ und Kristallstruktur von Bis[chloro(μ‐phenylimido)(η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)tantal(IV)](Ta–Ta), [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}2]

Molecular and Crystal Structure of Bis[chloro(μ‐phenylimido)(η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)tantalum(IV)](Ta–Ta), [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}₂] Despite the steric hindrance of the central atom in [TaCl₂(NPh)Cp*] (Ph = C₆H₅, Cp* = η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅), caused by the Cp* ligand, the imido‐ligand takes a change in bond structure when this educt is reduced to the binuclear complex [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}₂] in which tantalum is stabilized in the unusual oxidation state +4.     

Zum Einfluß der PR3‐Liganden auf Bildung und Eigenschaften der Phosphinophosphiniden‐Komplexe [{η2‐tBu2P–P}Pt(PR3)2] und [{η2‐tBu2P1–P2}Pt(P3R3)(P4R′3)]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes XXI The Influence of the PR₃ Ligands on Formation and Properties of the Phosphinophosphinidene Complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PR₃)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³R₃)(P⁴R′₃)] (R₃P)₂PtCl₂ and C₂H₄ yield the compounds [{η²‐C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (PR₃ = PMe₃, PEt₃, PPhEt₂, PPh₂Et, PPh₂Me, PPh₂ⁱPr, PPh₂^tBu and P(p‐Tol)₃); which react with ^tBu₂P–P=PMe^tBu₂ to give the phosphinophosphinidene complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PMe₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PEt₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPhEt₂)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Et)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Me)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂ⁱPr], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂^tBu)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂]. [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] reacts with PMe₃ and PEt₃ as well as with ^tBu₂PMe, PⁱPr₃ and P(c‐Hex)₃ by substituting one PPh₃ ligand to give [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Ph₃)(P⁴Me₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Et₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³ⁱPr₃)(P⁴Ph₃)] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³(c‐Hex)₃)(P⁴Ph₃)]. With ^tBu₂PMe, [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂] forms [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴(p‐Tol)₃)]. The NMR data of the compounds are given and discussed with respect to the influence of the PR₃ ligands.     

Reaction of Pentelidene Complexes with Diazoalkanes: Stabilization of Parent 2,3‐Dipnictabutadienes

The reaction of the phosphinidene complex [Cp*P{W(CO)₅}₂] ( 1 a ) with diphenyldiazomethane leads to [{W(CO)₅}Cp*P=NN{W(CO)₅}=CPh₂] ( 2 ). Compound 2 is a rare example of a phosphadiazadiene ligand (R‐P=N?N=CR′R′′) complex. At temperatures above 0 °C, 2 decomposes into the complex [{W(CO)₅}PCp*{N(H)N=CPh₂)₂] ( 3 ), among other species. The reaction of the pentelidene complexes [Cp*E{W(CO)₅}₂] (E=P, As) with diazomethane (CH₂NN) proceeds differently. For the arsinidene complex ( 1 b ), only the arsaalkene complex 4 b [{W(CO)₅}₂{η^1:2‐(Cp*)As=CH₂}] is formed. The reaction with the phosphinidene complex ( 1 a ) results in three products, the two phosphaalkene complexes [{W(CO)₅}₂{η^1:2‐(R)P=CH₂}] ( 4 a : R=Cp*, 5 : R=H) and the triazaphosphole derivative [{W(CO)₅}P(Cp*)‐CH₂‐N{W(CO)₅}=N‐N(N=CH₂)] ( 6 a ). The phosphaalkene complex ( 4 a ) and the arsaalkene complex ( 4 b ) are not stable at room temperature and decompose to the complexes [{W(CO)₅}₄(CH₂=E?E=CH₂)] ( 7 a : E=P, 7 b : E=As), which are the first examples of complexes with parent 2,3‐diphospha‐1,3‐butadiene and 2,3‐diarsa‐1,3‐butadiene ligands.     

Metal‐Deficient Supramolecule Based on a Fivefold‐Symmetric Building Block

An unprecedented cationic supramolecule [(Cp′′Fe(η⁵‐P₅))₁₂{CuNCMe}₈]⁸⁺ 2.66 nm in diameter was selectively isolated as a salt of the weakly coordinating anion [Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄]^? for the first time and characterized by X‐ray structure analysis, PXRD, NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. Its metal‐deficient core contains the lowest possible number of Cu atoms to connect 12 pentaphosphaferrocene units, providing a supramolecule with fullerene topology which, topologically, also represents the simplest homologue in the family of metal‐deficient pentaphosphaferrocene‐based supramolecules [{Cp^RFe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂(CuX)_20?n]. The 12 vacant metal sites between the cyclo‐P₅ rings, the largest number attained to date, make this compound a facile precursor for potential inner and outer modifications of the core as well as for functionalization via the substitution of labile acetonitrile ligands.     

Synthese und Molekülstruktur von [{Cp′(μ‐η1 : η5‐C5H3Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}2] (Cp′ = C5H4Me,R = iBu,Et)

Synthesis and Molecular Structure of [{Cp′(μ‐η¹ : η⁵‐C₅H₃Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}₂] (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me, R = ⁱBu, Et) [Cp′₂MoH₂] reacts with HAlR₂ to give [{Cp′(μ‐η¹ : η⁵‐C₅H₃Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}₂] (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me, R = ⁱBu ( 1 ), Et ( 2 )). Crystal structure determinations were carried out on [Cp′₂MoH₂] and 1 . 1 exhibits a direct Mo–Al bond (2.636(2) Å).     

Stepwise Formation of a 1,3‐Butadiene Analogue of Mixed Heavier Group 15 Elements

The reaction of the phosphinidene complex [Cp*P{W(CO)₅}₂] ( 1 a ) with di‐tert‐butylcarboimidophosphene leads to the P? C cage compound 6 and the Lewis acid–base adduct [Cp*P{W(CO)₅}₂(CNtBu)] ( 2 a ). In contrast, the arsinidene complex shows a different reactivity. At low temperatures, the arsaphosphene complex [{W(CO)₅}{η²‐(Cp*)As?P(tBu)}{W(CO)₅}] ( 3 ) is formed. At these temperatures, 3 reacts further with a second equivalent of carboimidophosphene to form [{W(CO)₅}{η²‐{(Cp*)(tBu)P}As?P(tBu)}{W(CO)₅}] ( 5 ), probably by the insertion of a phosphinidene unit (tBuP) into an As? C bond. In contrast, at room temperature 3 reacts further by a radical‐type reaction to form [{(tBu)P?As? As?P(tBu)}{W(CO)₅}₄] ( 4 ). Compound 4 is the first example of a neutral, 1,3‐butadiene analogue containing only mixed heavier Group 15 elements. It consists of two P?As double bonds connected by arsenic atoms.     

Highly Dynamic Coordination Behavior of Pn Ligand Complexes towards “Naked” Cu+ Cations

Reactions of Cu⁺ containing the weakly coordinating anion [Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄]^? with the polyphosphorus complexes [{CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ,η²:η²‐P₂)] ( A ), [CpM(CO)₂(η³‐P₃)] (M=Cr( B1 ), Mo ( B2 )), and [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] ( C ) are presented. The X‐ray structures of the products revealed mononuclear ( 4 ) and dinuclear ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) Cu^I complexes, as well as the one‐dimensional coordination polymer ( 5 a ) containing an unprecedented [Cu₂( C )₃]²⁺ paddle‐wheel building block. All products are readily soluble in CH₂Cl₂ and exhibit fast dynamic coordination behavior in solution indicated by variable temperature ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy.     

Zur Reaktivität von Titanocenkomplexen [Ti(Cp′)2(η2‐Me3SiC≡CSiMe3)] (Cp′ = Cp,Cp*) gegenüber Benzoldicarbonsäuren

On the Reactivity of Titanocene Complexes [Ti(Cp′)₂(η²‐Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃)] (Cp′ = Cp, Cp*) towards Benzenedicarboxylic Acids Titanocene complexes [Ti(Cp′)₂(BTMSA)] ( 1a , Cp′ = Cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅; 1b , Cp′ = Cp* = η⁵‐C₅Me₅; BTMSA = Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃) were found to react with iodine and methyl iodide yielding [Ti(Cp′)₂(μ‐I)₂] ( 2a / b ; a refers to Cp′ = Cp and b to Cp′ = Cp*), [Ti(Cp′)₂I₂] ( 3a / b ) and [Ti(Cp′)₂(Me)I] ( 4a / b ), respectively. In contrast to 2a , complex 2b proved to be highly moisture sensitive yielding with cleavage of HCp* [{Ti(Cp*)I}₂(μ‐O)] ( 7 ). The corresponding reactions of 1a / b with p‐cresol and thiophenol resulted in the formation of [Ti(Cp′)₂{O(p‐Tol)}₂] ( 5a / b ) and [Ti(Cp′)₂(SPh)₂] ( 6a / b ), respectively. Reactions of 1a and 1b with 1,n‐benzenedicarboxylic acids (n = 2–4) resulted in the formation of dinuclear titanium(III) complexes of the type [{Ti(Cp′)₂}₂{μ‐1,n‐(O₂C)₂C₆H₄}] (n = 2, 8a / b ; n = 3, 9a / b ; n = 4, 10a / b ). All complexes were fully characterized analytically and spectroscopically. Furthermore, complexes 7 , 8b , 9a ·THF, 10a / b were also be characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

Regioselective Insertion of Aluminum(I) in the cyclo‐P5 Ring of Pentaphosphaferrocene

A route to directly access mixed Al–Fe polyphosphide complexes was developed. The reactivity of pentaphosphaferrocene, [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] (Cp*=C₅Me₅), with two different low‐valent aluminum compounds was investigated. The steric and electronic environment around the [Al^I] centre are found to be crucial for the formation of the resulting Al–Fe polyphosphides. Reaction with the sterically demanding [Dipp‐BDIAl^I] (Dipp‐BDI={[2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃NCMe]₂CH}^?) resulted in the first Al‐based neutral triple‐decker type polyphosphide complex. For [(Cp*Al^I)₄], an unprecedented regioselective insertion of three [Cp*Al^III]²⁺ moieties into two adjacent P?P bonds of the cyclo‐P₅ ring of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] was observed. The regioselectivity of the insertion reaction could be rationalized by isolating an analogue of the reaction intermediate stabilized by a strong σ‐donor carbene.