Solvent‐Dependent Dihydrogen/Dihydride Stability for [Mo(CO)(Cp*)H2(PMe3)2]+[BF4]− Determined by Multiple Solvent⋅⋅⋅Anion⋅⋅⋅Cation Non‐Covalent Interactions

Low‐temperature (200 K) protonation of [Mo(CO)(Cp*)H(PMe₃)₂] ( 1 ) by Et₂O ? HBF₄ gives a different result depending on a subtle solvent change: The dihydrogen complex [Mo(CO)(Cp*)(η²‐H₂)(PMe₃)₂]⁺ ( 2 ) is obtained in THF, whereas the tautomeric classical dihydride [Mo(CO)(Cp*)(H)₂(PMe₃)₂]⁺ ( 3 ) is the only observable product in dichloromethane. Both products were fully characterised (ν_CO IR; ¹H, ³¹P, ¹³C NMR spectroscopies) at low temperature; they lose H₂ upon warming to 230 K at approximately the same rate (ca. 10^?3 s^?1), with no detection of the non‐classical form in CD₂Cl₂, to generate [Mo(CO)(Cp*)(FBF₃)(PMe₃)₂] ( 4 ). The latter also slowly decomposes at ambient temperature. One of the decomposition products was crystallised and identified by X‐ray crystallography as [Mo(CO)(Cp*)(FH???FBF₃)(PMe₃)₂] ( 5 ), which features a neutral HF ligand coordinated to the transition metal through the F atom and to the BF₄^? anion through a hydrogen bond. The reason for the switch in relative stability between 2 and 3 was probed by DFT calculations based on the B3LYP and M05‐2X functionals, with inclusion of anion and solvent effects by the conductor‐like polarisable continuum model and by explicit consideration of the solvent molecules. Calculations at the MP4(SDQ) and CCSD(T) levels were also carried out for calibration. The calculations reveal the key role of non‐covalent anion–solvent interactions, which modulate the anion–cation interaction ultimately altering the energetic balance between the two isomeric forms.     

Tuning the Magnetization Dynamic Properties of Nd⋅⋅⋅Fe and Nd⋅⋅⋅Co Single‐Molecular Magnets by Introducing 3 d–4 f Magnetic Interactions

By using paramagnetic [Fe(CN)₆]^3? anions in place of diamagnetic [Co(CN)₆]^3? anions, two field‐induced mononuclear single‐molecular magnets, [Nd(18‐crown‐6)(H₂O)₄][Co(CN)₆] ? 2 H₂O ( 1 ) and [Nd(18‐crown‐6)(H₂O)₄][Fe(CN)₆] ? 2 H₂O ( 2 ), have been synthesized and characterized. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed that compounds 1 and 2 were ionic complexes. The Nd^III ions were located inside the cavities of the 18‐crown‐6 ligands and were each bound by four water molecules on either side of the crown ether. Magnetic investigations showed that these compounds were both field‐induced single‐molecular magnets. By comparing the slow relaxation behaviors of compounds 1 and 2 , we found significant differences between the direct and Raman processes for these two complexes, with a stronger direct process in compound 2 at low temperatures. Complete active space self‐consistent field (CASSCF) calculations were also performed on two [Nd(18‐crown‐6)(H₂O)₄]³⁺ fragments of compounds 1 and 2 . Ab initio calculations showed that the magnetic anisotropies of the Nd^III centers in complexes 1 and 2 were similar to each other, which indicated that the difference in relaxation behavior was not owing to the magnetic anisotropy of Nd^III. Our analysis showed that the magnetic interaction between the Nd^III ion and the low‐spin Fe^III ion in complex 2 played an important role in enhancing the direct process and suppressing the Raman process of the single‐molecular magnet.     

Walking Metals in d8⋅⋅⋅d8 Hetero‐bimetallic Complexes: An Original Dynamic Phenomenon

In the course of our investigations on polymetallic complexes derived from 1,3‐bis(thiophosphinoyl)indene (Ind(Ph₂P?S)₂), we observed original fluxional behavior and report herein a joint experimental/computational study of this dynamic process. Starting from the indenylidene chloropalladate species [Pd{Ind(Ph₂P?S)₂}Cl]^? ( 1 ), the new Pd^II???Rh^I hetero‐bimetallic pincer complex [PdCl{Ind(Ph₂P?S)₂}Rh(nbd)] ( 2 ; nbd=2,5‐norbornadiene) was prepared. X‐ray crystallography and DFT calculations substantiate the presence of a d⁸???d⁸ interaction. According to multinuclear variable‐temperature NMR spectroscopic experiments, the pendant {Rh(nbd)} fragment of 2 readily shifts in solution at room temperature between the two edges of the SCS tridentate ligand. To assess the role of the pincer‐based polymetallic structure on this fluxional behavior, the related monometallic Rh complex [Rh{IndH(Ph₂P?S)₂}(nbd)] ( 3 ) was prepared. No evidence for a metal shift was observed in that case, even at high temperature, thus indicating that inplane pincer coordination to the Pd center plays a crucial role. The previously described Pd^II???Ir^I bimetallic complex 4 exhibited fluxional behavior in solution, but with a significantly higher activation barrier than 2 . This finding demonstrates the generality of this metal‐shift process and the strong influence of the involved metal centers on the associated activation barrier. DFT calculations were performed to shed light onto the mechanism of such metal‐shift processes and to identify the factors that influence the associated activation barriers. Significantly different pathways were found for bimetallic complexes 2 and 4 on one hand and the monometallic complex 3 on the other hand. The corresponding activation barriers predicted computationally are in very good agreement with the experimental observations.     

Host–Guest Chemistry: Oxoanion Recognition Based on Combined Charge‐Assisted C−H or Halogen‐Bonding Interactions and Anion⋅⋅⋅Anion Interactions Mediated by Hydrogen Bonds

Several bis‐triazolium‐based receptors have been synthesized and their anion‐recognition capabilities have been studied. The central chiral 1,1′‐bi‐2‐naphthol (BINOL) core features either two aryl or ferrocenyl end‐capped side arms with central halogen‐ or hydrogen‐bonding triazolium receptors. NMR spectroscopic data indicate the simultaneous occurrence of several charge‐assisted aliphatic and heteroaromatic C?H noncovalent interactions and combinations of C?H hydrogen and halogen bonding. The receptors are able to selectively interact with HP₂O₇^3?, H₂PO₄^?, and SO₄^2? anions, and the value of the association constant follows the sequence: HP₂O₇^3?>SO₄^2?>H₂PO₄^?. The ferrocenyl end‐capped 7²⁺?2 BF₄ ^? receptor allows recognition and differentiation of H₂PO₄^? and HP₂O₇^3? anions by using different channels: H₂PO₄^? is selectively detected through absorption and emission methods and HP₂O₇^3? by using electrochemical techniques. Significant structural results are the observation of an anion???anion interaction in the solid state (2:2 complex, 6²⁺? [ H₂P₂O₇ ] ^2? ), and a short C?I???O contact is observed in the structure of the complex [ 8 ²⁺][SO₄]_0.5[BF₄].     

[N⋅⋅⋅I+⋅⋅⋅N] Halogen‐Bonded Dimeric Capsules from Tetrakis(3‐pyridyl)ethylene Cavitands

Two [N???I⁺???N] halogen‐bonded dimeric capsules using tetrakis(3‐pyridyl)ethylene cavitands with different lower rim alkyl chains are synthesized and analyzed in solution and the gas phase. These first examples of symmetrical dimeric capsules making use of the iodonium ion (I⁺) as the main connecting module are characterized by ¹H NMR spectroscopy, diffusion ordered NMR spectroscopy (DOSY), electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS), and ion mobility‐mass spectrometry (TW‐IMS) experiments. The synthesis and effective halogen‐bonded dimerization proceeds through analogous dimeric capsules with [N???Ag⁺???N] binding motifs as the intermediates as evidenced by the X‐ray structures of (CH₂Cl₂)₂@[ 3 a ₂?Ag₄?(H₂O)₂?OTs₄] and (CH₂Cl₂)₂@[ 3 a ₂?Ag₄?(H₂O)₄?OTs₄], two structurally different capsules.     

Anionic CH⋅⋅⋅X− Hydrogen Bonds: Origin of Their Strength,Geometry, and Other Properties

CF₃H as a proton donor was paired with a variety of anions, and its properties were assessed by MP2/aug‐cc‐pVDZ calculations. The binding energy of monoanions halide, NO₃^?, formate, acetate, HSO₄^?, and H₂PO₄^? lie in the 12–17 kcal mol^?1 range, although F^? is more strongly bound, by 26 kcal mol^?1. Dianions SO₄^2? and HPO₄^2? are bound by 27 kcal mol^?1, and trianion PO₄^3? by 45 kcal mol^?1. When two O atoms are available on the anion, the CH???O^? H‐bond (HB) is usually bifurcated, although asymmetrically. The CH bond is elongated and its stretching frequency redshifted in these ionic HBs, but the shift is reduced in the bifurcated structures. Slightly more than half of the binding energy is attributed to Coulombic attraction, with smaller contributions from induction and dispersion. The amount of charge transfer from the anions to the σ*(CH) orbital correlates with many of the other indicators of bond strength, such as binding energy, CH bond stretch, CH redshift, downfield NMR spectroscopic chemical shift of the bridging proton, and density at bond critical points.     

CH⋅⋅⋅N Hydrogen‐Bonding Interaction in 7‐Azaindole:CHX3 (X=F,Cl) Complexes

The C?H???Y (Y=hydrogen‐bond acceptor) interactions are somewhat unconventional in the context of hydrogen‐bonding interactions. Typical C?H stretching frequency shifts in the hydrogen‐bond donor C?H group are not only small, that is, of the order of a few tens of cm^?1, but also bidirectional, that is, they can be red or blue shifted depending on the hydrogen‐bond acceptor. In this work we examine the C?H???N interaction in complexes of 7‐azaindole with CHCl₃ and CHF₃ that are prepared in the gas phase through supersonic jet expansion using the fluorescence depletion by infra‐red (FDIR) method. Although the hydrogen‐bond acceptor, 7‐azaindole, has multiple sites of interaction, it is found that the C?H???N hydrogen‐bonding interaction prevails over the others. The electronic excitation spectra suggest that both complexes are more stabilized in the S₁ state than in the S₀ state. The C?H stretching frequency is found to be red shifted by 82 cm^?1 in the CHCl₃ complex, which is the largest redshift reported so far in gas‐phase investigations of 1:1 haloform complexes with various substrates. In the CHF₃ complex the observed C?H frequency is blue shifted by 4 cm^?1. This is at variance with the frequency shifts that are predicted using several computational methods; these predict at best a redshift of 8.5 cm^?1. This discrepancy is analogous to that reported for the pyridine‐CHF₃ complex [W. A. Herrebout, S. M. Melikova, S. N. Delanoye, K. S. Rutkowski, D. N. Shchepkin, B. J. van der Veken, J. Phys. Chem. A­ 2005 , 109, 3038], in which the blueshift is termed a pseudo blueshift and is shown to be due to the shifting of levels caused by Fermi resonance between the overtones of the C?H bending and stretching modes. The dissociation energies, (D₀), of the CHCl₃ and CHF₃ complexes are computed (MP2/aug‐cc‐pVDZ level) as 6.46 and 5.06 kcal mol^?1, respectively.     

The Nature of the [TTF].+⋅⋅⋅[TTF].+ Interactions in the [TTF]22+ Dimers Embedded in Charged [3]Catenanes: Room‐Temperature Multicenter Long Bonds

The properties of tetrathiafulvalene dimers ([TTF]₂²⁺) and the functionalized ring‐shaped bispropargyl (BPP)‐functionalized TTF dimers, [BPP–TTF]₂²⁺, found at room temperature in charged [3]catenanes, were evaluated by M06L calculations. The results showed that their isolated [TTF]₂²⁺ and [BPP–TTF]₂²⁺ dimers are energetically unstable towards dissociation. When enclosed in the 4⁺‐charged central cyclophane ring of charged [3]catenanes (CBPQT⁴⁺), [TTF]₂²⁺ and [BPP–TTF]₂²⁺ dimers are also energetically unstable with respect to leaving the CBPQT⁴⁺ ring; since the barrier for the exiting process is only about 3 kcal mol^?1, that is, within the reach of thermal energies at room temperature (neutral [TTF]₂⁰ dimers are stable within the CBPQT⁴⁺ ring). However, the [BPP–TTF]₂²⁺ dimers in charged [3]catenanes cannot exit, because this would imply breaking the covalent bonds of the BPP–TTF⁺ macrocycle. Finally, it was shown that the [TTF]₂²⁺, [BPP–TTF]₂²⁺ dimers, and charged [3]catenanes are energetically stable in solution and in crystals of their salts, in the first case due to the interactions with the solvent, and in the second case mostly due to cation–anion interactions. In these environmental conditions at room temperature the TTF units of the [BPP–TTF]₂²⁺ dimers make short contacts, thus allowing their SOMO orbitals to overlap: a room‐temperature multicenter long bond is formed, similar to those previously found in other [TTF]₂²⁺ salts and their solutions.     

Cooperativity between the Halogen Bond and the Hydrogen Bond in H3N⋅⋅⋅XY⋅⋅⋅HF Complexes (X,Y=F,Cl, Br)

Ab initio calculations are used to provide information on H₃N???XY???HF triads (X, Y=F, Cl, Br) each having a halogen bond and a hydrogen bond. The investigated triads include H₃N???Br₂‐HF, H₃N???Cl₂???HF, H₃N???BrCI???HF, H₃N???BrF???HF, and H₃N???ClF???HF. To understand the properties of the systems better, the corresponding dyads are also investigated. Molecular geometries, binding energies, and infrared spectra of monomers, dyads, and triads are studied at the MP2 level of theory with the 6‐311++G(d,p) basis set. Because the primary aim of this study is to examine cooperative effects, particular attention is given to parameters such as cooperative energies, many‐body interaction energies, and cooperativity factors. The cooperative energy ranges from ?1.45 to ?4.64 kcal mol^?1, the three‐body interaction energy from ?2.17 to ?6.71 kcal mol^?1, and the cooperativity factor from 1.27 to 4.35. These results indicate significant cooperativity between the halogen and hydrogen bonds in these complexes. This cooperativity is much greater than that between hydrogen bonds. The effect of a halogen bond on a hydrogen bond is more pronounced than that of a hydrogen bond on a halogen bond.     

Low‐Energy‐Barrier Proton Transfer Induced by Electron Attachment to the Guanine⋅⋅⋅Cytosine Base Pair

The photoelectron spectrum of the anion of the guanine ??? cytosine base apair (GC)^.? is recorded for the first time. The observed variation in the spectral peak‐height ratios with the source conditions suggests the presence of two or more anionic isomers. Two maxima of the broad bands in the photoelectron spectrum were measured at about 1.9 and about 2.6 eV. These values are very well reproduced by the vertical detachment energies of the B3LYP/6‐31++G(d,p) calculated low‐energy anionic structures, which are 1) the Watson–Crick base‐pair anion with proton transferred from N1 of guanine to N3 of cytosine, 2) its analogue in which the proton is transferred from N9 of guanine to N7 of guanine, and 3) the global minimum geometry, which is formed from the latter anion by rotation of guanine about the axis approximately defined by C2 of guanine and C4 of cytosine. Furthermore, a minor difference in the stabilities of the two lowest energy anions explains the experimentally observed source (temperature) dependence of the PES spectrum. A rational procedure, based on the chemistry involved in the formation of anionic dimers, which enables the low‐energy anions populated in the photoelectron spectrum to be identified is proposed. In contrast to the alternative combinatorial approach, which in the studied case would lead to carrying out quantum chemical calculations for 2000–2500 structures, the procedure described here reduces the computational problem to only 15 geometries.     

Intramolecular Metal⋅⋅⋅π‐Arene Interactions in Neutral and Cationic Main Group Compounds

The role of intramolecular metal???π‐arene interactions has been investigated in the solid‐state structures of a series of main group compounds supported by the bulky amide ligands, [N(^tBuAr^≠)(SiR₃)]^? (^tBuAr^≠=2,6‐(CHPh₂)₂‐4‐tBuC₆H₂, R=Me, Ph). The lithium and potassium amide salts showed different patterns of solvation and demonstrated that the SiPh₃ substituent is able to be involved in stabilizing the electrophilic metal. These group 1 metal compounds served as ligand transfer reagents to access a series of bismuth(III) halides. Chloride extraction from Bi(N{^tBuAr^≠}{SiPh₃})Cl₂ using AlCl₃ afforded the 1:1 salt [Bi(N{^tBuAr^≠}{SiPh₃})Cl][AlCl₄]. This was accompanied by a significant rearrangement of the stabilizing π‐arene contacts in the solid‐state. Attempted preparation of the corresponding tetraphenylborate salt resulted in phenyl‐transfer and generation of the neutral Bi(N{^tBuAr^≠}{SiPh₃})(Ph)Cl.     

Luminescent Benzoquinolate‐Isocyanide Platinum(II) Complexes: Effect of Pt⋅⋅⋅Pt and π⋅⋅⋅π Interactions on their Photophysical Properties

The neutral compounds [Pt(bzq)(CN)(CNR)] (R=tBu ( 1 ), Xyl ( 2 ), 2‐Np ( 3 ); bzq= benzoquinolate, Xyl=2,6‐dimethylphenyl, 2‐Np=2‐napthyl) were isolated as the pure isomers with a trans‐C_bzq,CNR configuration, as confirmed by ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectroscopy in the isotopically marked [Pt(bzq)(¹³CN)(CNR)] (R=tBu ( 1′ ), Xyl ( 2′ ), 2‐Np ( 3′ )) derivatives (δ¹³C_CN≈110 ppm; ¹J(Pt,¹³C)≈1425 Hz]. By contrast, complex [Pt(bzq)(C≡CPh)(CNXyl)] ( 4 ) with a trans‐N_bzq,CNR configuration, has been selectively isolated from [Pt(bzq)Cl(CNXyl)] (trans‐N_bzq,CNR) using Sonogashira conditions. X‐ray diffraction studies reveal that while 1 adopts a columnar‐stacked chain structure with Pt–Pt distances of 3.371(1) Å and significant π???π interactions (3.262 Å), complex 2 forms dimers supported only by short Pt???Pt (3.370(1) Å) interactions. In complex 4 the packing is directed by weak bzq???Xyl and bzq???C≡E (C, N) interactions. In solid state at room temperature, compounds 1 and 2 both show a bright red emission (?=42.1 % 1 , 57.6 % 2 ). Luminescence properties in the solid state at 77 K and concentration‐dependent emission studies in CH₂Cl₂ at 298 K and at 77 K are also reported for 1 , 1·CHCl3 , 2 , 2' , 2·CHCl3 , 3 , 4 .     

Strong CH⋅⋅⋅Halide Hydrogen Bonds from 1,2,3‐Triazoles Quantified Using Pre‐Organized and Shape‐Persistent Triazolophanes

The structures associated with halide (F^?, Cl^?, Br^?) complexation inside CH hydrogen‐bonding macrocyclic receptors, called triazolophanes, are characterized using density functional theory (DFT). The associated binding energies in the gas and solution phases are evaluated. The ruffles in the empty triazolophane become smoothed‐out upon Cl^?‐ and Br^?‐ion binding directly into the middle of the cavity. The largely pre‐organized cavity morphs into an elliptical shape to facilitate shorter hydrogen bonds in the north and south regions and longer ones west and east. The smaller F^? ion sits in, and flattens‐out, only the north (or south) region. The 1,2,3‐triazoles show shorter CH???Cl^? contacts than for the phenylenes. Both Cl^? and Br^? show the same binding geometries but Cl^? has a larger binding energy consistent with its stronger Lewis basicity. Model triads were used to decompose the overall binding energy into those of its components. In the course of this triad analysis, anion polarization was identified and its contribution to the triad???Cl^? binding energy estimated. Consequently, the binding energies for the individual aryl units within the comparatively non‐polarized triazolophanes were estimated. The 1,2,3‐triazoles are twice as strong as the phenylenes thus contributing most of the interaction energy to Cl^?‐ion binding. Therefore, the 1,2,3‐triazoles appear to approach the hydrogen bond strengths of the NH donors of pyrrole units.     

Influence of the Li⋅⋅⋅π Interaction on the H/X⋅⋅⋅π Interactions in HOLi⋅⋅⋅C6H6⋅⋅⋅HOX/XOH (X=F,Cl, Br,I) Complexes

The influences of the Li???π interaction of C₆H₆???LiOH on the H???π interaction of C₆H₆???HOX (X=F, Cl, Br, I) and the X???π interaction of C₆H₆???XOH (X=Cl, Br, I) are investigated by means of full electronic second‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory calculations and “quantum theory of atoms in molecules” (QTAIM) studies. The binding energies, binding distances, infrared vibrational frequencies, and electron densities at the bond critical points (BCPs) of the hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds prove that the addition of the Li???π interaction to benzene weakens the H???π and X???π interactions. The influences of the Li???π interaction on H???π interactions are greater than those on X???π interactions; the influences of the H???π interactions on the Li???π interaction are greater than X???π interactions on Li???π interaction. The greater the influence of Li???π interaction on H/X???π interactions, the greater the influences of H/X???π interactions on Li???π interaction. QTAIM studies show that the intermolecular interactions of C₆H₆???HOX and C₆H₆???XOH are mainly of the π type. The electron densities at the BCPs of hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds decrease on going from bimolecular complexes to termolecular complexes, and the π‐electron densities at the BCPs show the same pattern. Natural bond orbital analyses show that the Li???π interaction reduces electron transfer from C₆H₆ to HOX and XOH.     

The Origin of the Room‐Temperature Stability of [TTF].+⋅⋅⋅[TTF].+ Long,Multicenter Bonds Found in Functionalized π‐[R‐TTF]22+ Dimers Included in the Cucurbit[8]uril Cavity

A computational study is performed to identify the origin of the room‐temperature stability, in aqueous solution, of functionalized π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ dimers (TTF=tetrathiafulvalene; R=(CH₂OCH₂)₅CH₂OH) included in the cavity of a cucurbit[8]uril (CB[8]) molecule. π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ dimers in pure water are weakly stable, and are mostly dissociated at room temperature. Upon addition of CB[8] to an aqueous π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ solution, a (π‐[R‐TTF]₂?CB[8])²⁺ inclusion complex is formed. The same complex is obtained after the sequential inclusion of two [R‐TTF]^.+ monomers in the CB[8] molecule. Both processes are thermodynamically and kinetically allowed. π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ dimers dissolved in pure water present a [TTF]^.+???[TTF]^.+ long, multicenter bond, similar to that already identified in π‐[TTF]₂²⁺ dimers dissolved in organic solvents. Upon their inclusion in CB[8], the strength and other features of the [TTF]^.+???[TTF]^.+ long, multicenter bond are preserved. The room temperature stability of the π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ dimers included in CB[8] is shown to originate in the π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺???CB[8] interaction, the strength of which comes from a strongly attractive electrostatic component and a dispersion component. Such a dominant electrostatic term is caused by the strongly polarized charge distribution in CB[8], the geometrical complementarity of the π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ and CB[8] geometries, and the amplifying effect of the 2+ charge in π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺.     

Theoretical Investigation on the Effect of Different Nitrogen Donors on Intramolecular Se⋅⋅⋅N Interactions

The effect of different donor nitrogen atoms on the strength and nature of intramolecular Se ??? N interactions is evaluated for organoselenium compounds having N,N‐dimethylaminomethyl (dime), oxazoline (oxa) and pyridyl (py) substituents. Quantum chemical calculations on three series of compounds [2‐(dime)C₆H₄SeX ( 1 a – g ), 2‐(oxa)C₆H₄SeX ( 2 a – g ), 2‐(py)C₆H₄SeX ( 3 a – g ); X=Cl, Br, OH, CN, SPh, SePh, CH₃] at the B3LYP/6‐31G(d) level show that the stability of different conformers depends on the strength of intramolecular nonbonded Se ??? N interactions. Natural bond orbital (NBO), NBO deletion and atoms in molecules (AIM) analyses suggest that the nature of the Se ??? N interaction is predominantly covalent and involves nN→σ*_{Se? X} orbital interaction. In the three series of compounds, the strength of the Se ??? N interaction decreases in the order 3 > 2 > 1 for a particular X, and it decreases in the order Cl>Br>OH>SPh≈CN≈SePh>CH₃ for all the three series 1 – 3 . However, further analyses suggest that the differences in strength of Se ??? N interaction in 1 – 3 is predominantly determined by the distance between the Se and N atoms, which in turn is an outcome of specific structures of 1 , 2 and 3 , and the nature of the donor nitrogen atoms involved has very little effect on the strength of Se ??? N interaction. It is also observed that Se ??? N interaction becomes stronger in polar solvents such as CHCl₃, as indicated by the shorter r_{Se ??? N} and higher E_{Se ??? N} values in CHCl₃ compared to those observed in the gas phase.     

Boron as an Electron‐Pair Donor for B⋅⋅⋅Cl Halogen Bonds

MP2/aug′‐cc‐pVTZ calculations were performed to investigate boron as an electron‐pair donor in halogen‐bonded complexes (CO)₂(HB):ClX and (N₂)₂(HB):ClX, for X=F, Cl, OH, NC, CN, CCH, CH₃, and H. Equilibrium halogen‐bonded complexes with boron as the electron‐pair donor are found on all of the potential surfaces, except for (CO)₂(HB):ClCH₃ and (N₂)₂(HB):ClF. The majority of these complexes are stabilized by traditional halogen bonds, except for (CO)₂(HB):ClF, (CO)₂(HB):ClCl, (N₂)₂(HB):ClCl, and (N₂)₂(HB):ClOH, which are stabilized by chlorine‐shared halogen bonds. These complexes have increased binding energies and shorter B?Cl distances. Charge transfer stabilizes all complexes and occurs from the B lone pair to the σ* Cl?A orbital of ClX, in which A is the atom of X directly bonded to Cl. A second reduced charge‐transfer interaction occurs in (CO)₂(HB):ClX complexes from the Cl lone pair to the π* C≡O orbitals. Equation‐of‐motion coupled cluster singles and doubles (EOM‐CCSD) spin–spin coupling constants, ^1xJ(B‐Cl), across the halogen bonds are also indicative of the changing nature of this bond. ^1xJ(B‐Cl) values for both series of complexes are positive at long distances, increase as the distance decreases, and then decrease as the halogen bonds change from traditional to chlorine‐shared bonds, and begin to approach the values for the covalent bonds in the corresponding ions [(CO)₂(HB)?Cl]⁺ and [(N₂)₂(HB)?Cl]⁺. Changes in ¹¹B chemical shieldings upon complexation correlate with changes in the charges on B.     

The nido‐Cage⋅⋅⋅π Bond: A Non‐covalent Interaction between Boron Clusters and Aromatic Rings and Its Applications

Non‐covalent interactions involving multicenter multielectron skeletons such as boron clusters are rare. Now, a non‐covalent interaction, the nido‐cage???π bond, is discovered based on the boron cluster C₂B₉H₁₂^? and an aromatic π system. The X‐ray diffraction studies indicate that the nido‐cage???π bonding presents parallel‐displaced or T‐shaped geometries. The contacting distance between cage and π ring varies with the type and the substituent of the aromatic ring. Theoretical calculations reveal that this nido‐cage???π bond shares a similar nature to the conventional anion???π or π???π bonds found in classical aromatic ring systems. This nido‐cage???π interaction induces variable photophysical properties such as aggregation‐induced emission and aggregation‐caused quenching in one molecule. This work offers an overall understanding towards the boron cluster‐based non‐covalent bond and opens a door to investigate its properties.     

Influence of the Homopolar Dihydrogen Bonding CH⋅⋅⋅HC on Coordination Geometry: Experimental and Theoretical Studies

The reaction of the N‐thiophosphorylated thiourea (HOCH₂)(Me)₂CNHC(S)NHP(S)(OiPr)₂ (HL), deprotonated by the thiophosphorylamide group, with NiCl₂ leads to green needles of the pseudotetrahedral complex [Ni(L‐1,5‐S,S′)₂] ? 0.5 (n‐C₆H₁₄) or pale green blocks of the trans square‐planar complex trans‐[Ni(L‐1,5‐S,S′)₂]. The former complex is stabilized by homopolar dihydrogen C?H???H?C interactions formed by n‐hexane solvent molecules with the [Ni(L‐1,5‐S,S′)₂] unit. Furthermore, the dispersion‐dominated C?H??? H?C interactions are, together with other noncovalent interactions (C?H???N, C?H???Ni, C?H???S), responsible for pseudotetrahedral coordination around the Ni^II center in [Ni(L ‐1,5‐S,S′)₂] ? 0.5 (n‐C₆H₁₄).     

Unprecedented Solvent‐Assisted Reactivity of Hydrido W3CuS4 Cubane Clusters: The Non‐Innocent Behaviour of the Cluster‐Core Unit

Opening the cluster core : Substitution of the chloride ligand in the novel cationic cluster [W₃CuS₄H₃Cl(dmpe)₃]⁺ (see figure; dmpe=1,2‐bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane) by acetonitrile is promoted by water addition. Kinetic and density functional theory studies lead to a mechanistic proposal in which acetonitrile or water attack causes the opening of the cluster core with dissociation of one of the Cu? S bonds to accommodate the entering ligand.