Measurement uncertainty – a reliable concept in food analysis and for the use of recovery data?

 Steps which are taken to implement the concept of measurement uncertainty in analytical chemical laboratories should take full account of existing internationally agreed protocols for analytical quality assurance and reflect the needs of particular analytical sectors. For the food sector this may mean that for official purposes the use of the term measurement uncertainty is replaced by the term measurement reliability and that a quantitative estimation of this is made based on existing collaborative trial data. In many analytical sectors, the differing strategies currently followed for the determination and use of recovery information are an important cause of the non-comparability of analytical results. Guidelines which are being prepared for the estimation and use of recovery information in analytical measurement may provide a more unified approach which includes measurement uncertainty as a key concept in the use of recovery data. Received: 4 November 1997 · Accepted: 3 February 1998     

Development of metrology for pH measurement in Thailand

It has not been long that metrology is well accepted as an important part in analytical chemistry since it helps the chemists to receive the best measurement and accurate results with traceability. The National Institute of Metrology Thailand (NIMT), which is a public agency under the supervision of the Ministry of Science and Technology, not only focuses on physical standards but also provides and maintains standards in chemical field. pH measurement is one of the most widely used in the laboratories including industries and medical area in Thailand. The chemical laboratory starts working on the project with the objective of disseminating an accurate result in routine pH measurement. In 2002, the laboratory provided a service in calibration of pH meter and organized the first local interlaboratory comparison program (NIMT–C-ILC-1: pH buffer) in pH measurement. There were three buffer solution samples in the range of acid, neutral, and base. A total of 44 laboratories participated in this program. The NIMT chemical laboratory also participated in the proficiency testing program that was conducted by PSB Corporation Testing Group in Singapore. In 2003, NIMT started research in preparation of secondary buffers by using highly accurate pH meters with glass electrode systems. The laboratory produced three secondary buffers, which were pH 4.01, 6.86, and 9.18 with uncertainty 0.020 pH at 25°C. The competence of the laboratory was shown by the measurement results of the pilot study (APMP.QM-P06), which was organized by the APMP electrochemical analysis working group (EAWG/TCQM) in 2005. The title of this study was “pH determination of two phosphate buffers by Harned cell method and glass electrode method”. NIMT aims to achieve for establishment of the primary method for pH measurement in the near future. Presented at -- “BERM-10” -- April 2006, Charleston, SC, USA     

IMEP in support of the comparability of measurement results across the Romanian chemical metrology infrastructure

On the basis of quantitative chemical measurements many important decisions are made in support of legislation or in industrial processes or social aspects. For this reason it is important to improve the quality of chemical measurement results and thus make them comparable and acceptable everywhere. The measurement quality is important to enable an equivalent implementation of the European Union regulations and directives across an enlarged EU. In this context, the European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Reference Materials and Measurement (EC-JRC-IRMM) set up a programme to improve the scientific basis for metrology in chemistry (MiC) in EU candidate countries in the framework of EU enlargement. Several activities were initiated, such as training, fellowships, sponsoring of seminars, conferences and participation in interlaboratory comparisons. To disseminate measurement traceability, IRMM provides through its International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) an interlaboratory tool to enable the benchmarking of laboratory performance. IMEP emphasizes the metrological aspects of measurement results, such as traceability and measurement uncertainty. In this way it has become a publicly available European tool for MiC. The Romanian Bureau of Legal Metrology – National Institute of Metrology (BRML-INM) actively supports the participation of Romanian authorized and field laboratories in IMEP interlaboratory comparisons. This paper describes the interest of Romanian laboratories participating in this programme, the analytical and metrological problems that became relevant during these exercises and some actions for improvement. The results from Romanian laboratories participating in IMEP-12 (water), IMEP-16 (wine), IMEP-17 (human serum) and IMEP-20 (tuna fish) are presented. To conclude, the educational and training activities at national level organized jointly by the Romanian National Institute of Metrology (INM) and IRMM are also mentioned.     

On the accuracy of micro Winkler titration procedures: a case study

Accuracy data (expressed as precision and trueness) presented by the authors of three different micro modifications of the Winkler titration procedure for dissolved oxygen concentration determination are critically evaluated. Tentative uncertainty estimates are extracted from the data based on the single-laboratory validation approach (originally published in the Nordtest Technical Report 537) and they lead to expanded uncertainty (k = 2) estimates in the range from 0.13 to 0.27 mg l⁻¹ for the three procedures. It is demonstrated that, in all cases, the authors have presented the accuracy and/or precision estimates of the procedures in a way that can lead to too optimistic conclusions about the uncertainty of their procedures. This case study demonstrates the usefulness and flexibility of the single-laboratory validation approach to uncertainty estimation, even in the case of insufficient data, and can be of interest to laboratory workers dealing with measurement procedures from the literature. It is also expected to be of interest to university instructors of analytical chemistry and metrology in chemistry as a real-life example of the critical evaluation of the literature data. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Validation of the uncertainty evaluation for the determination of metals in solid samples by atomic spectrometry

 Every analytical result should be expressed with some indication of its quality. The uncertainty as defined by Eurachem ("parameter associated with the result of a measurement that characterises the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the, . . ., quantity subjected to measurement") is a good tool to accomplish this goal in quantitative analysis. Eurachem has produced a guide to the estimation of the uncertainty attached to an analytical result. Indeed, the estimation of the total uncertainty by using uncertainty propagation laws is components-dependent. The estimation of some of those components is based on subjective criteria. The identification of the uncertainty sources and of their importance, for the same method, can vary from analyst to analyst. It is important to develop tools which will support each choice and approximation. In this work, the comparison of an estimated uncertainty with an experimentally assessed one, through a variance test, is performed. This approach is applied to the determination by atomic absorption of manganese in digested samples of lettuce leaves. The total uncertainty estimation is calculated assuming 100% digestion efficiency with negligible uncertainty. This assumption was tested. Received: 3 November 1997 · Accepted: 2 January 1998     

On practical metrology and chemical analysis: etalons and traceability systems

 National measurement systems are infrastructures to ensure, for each nation, a consistent and internationally recognised basis for measurement. Such complex systems have historical, technical, legal, organisational and institutional aspects to connect scientific metrology with practical measurements. Underlying any valid measurement is a chain of comparisons linking the measurement to an accepted standard. The ways the links are forged and the etalons (measurement standards) to which they connect are defining characteristics of all measurement systems. This is often referred to as traceability which aims at basing measurements in common measurement units – a key issue for the integration of quantitative chemical analysis with the evolving physical and engineering measurement systems. Adequate traceability and metrological control make possible new technical capabilities and new levels of quality assurance and confidence by users in the accuracy and integrity of quantitative analytical results. Traceability for chemical measurements is difficult to achieve and harder to demonstrate. The supply of appropriate etalons is critical to the development of metrology systems for chemical analysis. An approach is suggested that involves the development of networks of specialised reference laboratories able to make matrix-independent reference measurements on submitted samples, which may then be used as reference materials by an originating laboratory using its practical measurement procedures. Received: 31 July 1995 Accepted: 19 August 1995     

Quality assurance in the view of a commercial analytical laboratory

 The necessity for analytical quality assurance is primarily a feature of the analytical process itself. With the full establishment of the EU domestic market, it is also becoming a legal necessity for an increasing number of analytical laboratories. The requirements which laboratories will need to fulfil are stipulated in DIN EN 45 001. Accredited testing laboratories must in fact provide evidence that they work solely in accordance with this standard. National and EU commissions, which are legislative authorities, tend therefore to specify analytical methods, e.g. in the form of regulations or appendices thereto, intended to ensure that results from different laboratories will be comparable and hence will stand up in a court of law. The analytical quality assurance system (AQS), introduced by the Baden-Württemberg Ministry for the Environment in 1984, obliges laboratories to regularly participate in collaborative studies and thereby demonstrate their ability to provide suitably accurate analyses. This alone, however, does not sufficiently demonstrate the competence of a laboratory. Only personal appraisal of the laboratory by an auditor, together with the successful analysis of a sample provided by the same and performed under his observation, can provide proof of the competence of the laboratory. From an analytical point of view, the competence of a laboratory must be regarded as the decisive factor. Competence can only be attained through analytical quality assurance, which thus must be demanded of all laboratories. Received: 4 October 1996 Accepted: 15 January 1997     

Traceability and uncertainty – A comparison of their application in chemical and physical measurement

 Establishment of the traceability and the evaluation of the uncertainty of the result of a measurement are essential in order to establish its comparability and fitness for purpose. There are both similarities and differences in the way that the concepts of traceability and uncertainty have been utilised in physical and chemical measurement. The International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM) have only in the last decade set up programmes in chemical metrology similar to those that have been in existence for physical metrology for over a century. However, analytical chemists over that same period have also developed techniques, based on the concepts of traceability and uncertainty, to ensure that their results are comparable and fit for purpose. This paper contrasts these developments in physical and chemical metrology and identifies areas where these two disciplines can learn from each other.     

The use of certified reference materials in the Romanian traceability scheme

 For ensuring the traceability and uniformity of measurement results, the main objectives of national metrology programmes in chemistry are to calibrate and verify measuring instruments, to evaluate the uncertainty of measurement results and to intercompare the analytical results, etc. The concept of traceability has developed recently in chemical measurements, thus, an attempt to implement the principles of metrological traceability especially by appropriateness calibration using composition certified reference materials (CRMs) is underlined. Interlaboratory comparisons are also a useful response to the need for comparable results. The paper presents some aspects and practices in the field of spectrometric measurement regarding the metrological quality of the traceability by calibrating the instruments using suitable and reliable CRMs. The uncertainty of results, as a measure of the reliability that can be placed on them, has been adequately described in different documents and, as a consequence, some examples of evaluating the measurement uncertainty are described. The relationship between uncertainty and traceability, as two fundamental concepts of metrology which are intimately linked, is underlined. Received: 12 November 1999 / Accepted: 10 December 1999     

ISO uncertainty and collaborative trial data

 The possibility of using interlaboratory study repeatability and reproducibility estimates as the basis for measurement uncertainty estimates is discussed. It is argued that collaborative trial reproducibility is an appropriate basis for estimating uncertainty in routine testing provided certain conditions are met by the laboratory. The primary shortcomings relate to establishment of traceability and consequent estimation of bias associated with the method, and quantitatively establishing the relevance to the single laboratory. Approaches to resolving both difficulties are proposed, the former via full implementation of trueness determination suggested in ISO 5725 : 1994 or by independent checks on individual accuracy and precision, the latter via a reconciliation procedure. The paper also discusses other factors including sampling and sample pre-treatment, change in sample matrix, and the influence of level of analyte. Received: 28 October 1997 · Accepted: 17 November 1997     

A validation concept for purity determination and assay in the pharmaceutical industry using measurement uncertainty and statistical process control

 The analytical chemists in process development in the pharmaceutical industry have to solve the difficult problem of producing high quality methods for purity determination and assay within a short time without a clear definition of the substance to be analyzed. Therefore the quality management is very difficult. The ideal situation would be that every method is validated before use. This is not possible because this would delay the development process. A process-type quality development approach with an estimation type fast validation (measurement uncertainty) is therefore suggested. The quality management process consists of the estimation of measurement uncertainty for early project status. Statistical process control (SPC) is started directly after measurement uncertainty estimation and a classical validation for the end of the project. By this approach a process is defined that allows a fast and cost-efficient way of supporting the development process with the appropriate quality at the end of the process and provides the transparency needed in the development process. The procedure presented tries to solve the problem of the parallelism between the two development processes (chemical and analytical development) by speeding up the analytical development process initially. Received: 25 March 1997 · Accepted: 17 May 1997     

Stoichiometry and chemical metrology: Karl Fischer reaction

 Stoichiometry of analytical reactions is discussed as an important element of many primary methods (gravimetry, volumetry, spectrophotometry, etc.) and therefore, of chemical metrology as a whole. Variations in stoichiometry caused by non-equilibrium conditions, by changes in the reaction medium or by other factors can be a source of the dominant uncertainty component in the analytical measurement. Such a situation is illustrated with the Karl Fischer (KF) reaction which is widely used in aquametry. Two kinds of solvents used as a part of the reaction medium – alcohols and amides – are compared. The influence of the media on the stoichiometry of the reaction and, correspondingly, on the titre of the KF reagent is evaluated. Received: 4 November 1998 · Accepted: 22 December 1998     

Reference materials to evaluate measurement systems for the nutrient composition of foods: results from USDA’s National Food and Nutrient Analysis Program (NFNAP)

Over a 6.5-year period a total of 2554 values were reported by nine laboratories for 259 certified or reference nutrient concentrations in 26 certified reference materials (CRM) submitted to contract laboratories, blinded, as part of the qualifying process for analytical contracts and in the routine sample stream as part of the National Food and Nutrient Analysis Program. Each value was converted to a Z′-score, reflecting the difference from the assigned value related to the combined expected analytical uncertainty plus the uncertainty in the CRM value. Z′-scores >|3.0| were considered unacceptable. For some nutrients (Na, folate, dietary fiber, pantothenic acid, thiamin, tocopherols, carotenoids, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids), >20% of Z′-scores were >|3.0|. For total fat, vitamin C, and niacin >25% of Z′-scores were >|2.0|. Components for which CRM data were best (more than 90% of Z′-scores <|2.0|) were Mg, P, Mn, Se, and vitamin B12. In some cases deviations from assigned values were not uniform across laboratories and materials. For Na almost all high Z′-scores were for low-Na matrices, suggesting analytical problems related to concentration. Figure Z′-scores for vitamins in certified reference materials Disclaimer: Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to specify the experimental procedure adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or the United States Department of Agriculture, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.     

Metrological traceability is not always a straight line

The two most important concepts in metrology are certainly “traceability to standards” and “measurement uncertainty evaluation”. So far the questions related to these concepts have been reasonably solved in the metrology of “classical quantities”, but for the introduction of metrological concepts in new fields, such as chemistry and biology, a lot of problems remain and must be solved in order to support international arrangements. In this presentation, the authors want to develop the strategy implemented at Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE) in metrology in chemistry and biology. The strategy is based on: (1) pure solutions for calibration of analytical instruments, (2) use of certified reference materials (matrix reference materials), and (3) participation to proficiency testing schemes. Examples will be presented in organic and inorganic chemistry. For laboratory medicine, proficiency testing providers play an important role in the organization of External Quality Assessment Schemes. For the time being, the reference value or the assigned value of the comparison is calculated with the results obtained by the participants. This assigned value is not often traceable to SI units. One of the methods suggested by LNE is to ensure the metrological traceability to SI units of the assigned value for the more critical quantities carried on analytes by implementing the Joint committee for traceability in laboratory medicine reference methods.     

Quality assurance of qualitative analysis in the framework of the European project ’MEQUALAN’

 The European Commission has supported the G6MA-CT-2000–01012 project on ”Metrology of Qualitative Chemical Analysis” (MEQUALAN), which was developed during 2000–2002. The final result is a document produced by a group of scientists with expertise in different areas of chemical analysis, metrology and quality assurance. One important part of this document deals, therefore, with aspects involved in analytical quality assurance of qualitative analysis. This article shows the main conclusions reported in the document referring to the implementation of quality principles in qualitative analysis: traceability, reliability (uncertainty), validation, and internal/external quality control for qualitative methods. Received: 15 October 2002 Accepted: 20 October 2002 This paper is a summary of the Quality Assurance section included in the final report of the MEQUALAN project. The authors of this paper correspond to the members of the MEQUALAN Consortium. One of them (K.H.) does not fully agree with some parts of the text. Correspondence to A. Ríos     

Ménage À Trois: Activation, Analysis and Uncertainty, 10 Projections into the Impending Millenium

For more than half a century we have been using activation of stable isotopes to determine chemical elements, and significant contributions have been made to a variety of scientific subjects. Nevertheless, activation analysis has not yet become integrated in the field of chemical analysis, and therefore the special features characteristic of activation analysis have not been fully realised in analytical chemistry. At the same time basic chemical knowledge has only to a limited extent been utilised in the development of analytical methods based on activation. This situation has only now become painfully clear, when a world-wide requirement is being made to express the uncertainty of analytical results in accordance with the BIPM philosophy. The identification and estimation of all uncertainty components needed to produce a reliable uncertainty budget requires the combined efforts of all parties. An attempt is here made to extrapolate current trends for the expression of uncertainty in activation and analysis into the future and to show, how the implementation of the BIPM Guidelines with respect to correction for all known or suspected biases, achievement of statistical control, and full traceability, can help bringing analytical chemistry into its rightful position as a scientific discipline in the field of metrology.     

Different approaches to legal requirements on validation of test methods for official control of foodstuffs and of veterinary drug residues and element contaminants in the EC

 In order to ensure food consumer protection as well as to avoid barriers to trade and unnecessary duplications of laboratory tests and to gain mutual recognition of results of analyses, the quality of laboratories and test results has to be guaranteed. For this purpose, the EC Council and the Commission have introducedprovisions – on measures for quality assurance for official laboratories concerning the analyses of foodstuffs on the one hand and animals and fresh meat on the other, – on the validation of test methods to obtain results of sufficient accuracy. This article deals with legal requirements in the European Union on basic principles of laboratory quality assurance for official notification to the EC Commission and on method validation concerning official laboratories. Widespread discussions and activities on measurement uncertainty are in progress, and the European validation standards for official purposes may serve as a basis for world-wide efforts on quality harmonization of analytical results. Although much time has already been spent, definitions and requirements have to be revised and further additions have to be made.     

Chemical metrology, chemistry and the uncertainty of chemical measurements

Chemical results normally involve traceability to two reference points, the specific chemical entity and the quantity of this entity. Results must also be traceable back to the original sample. As a consequence, any useful estimation of uncertainty in results must include components arising from any lack of specificity of the method, the variation between repeats of the measurement and the relationship of the result to the original sample. Chemical metrology does not yet incorporate uncertainty arising from any lack of specificity from the method selected or the traceability of the result to the original sample. These sources of uncertainty may however have much more impact on the reliability of the result than will any uncertainty associated with the repeatability of the measurement. Uncertainty associated with sampling may amount to 50–1000% of the reported result. Chemical metrology must be expanded to include estimations of uncertainty associated with lack of specificity and sampling. Received: 29 May 2001 Accepted: 17 December 2001     

Experience with in-house PT-schemes in the chemical industry

There are many different means of demonstrating the quality of performance of an analytical laboratory. Proficiency testing (PT) is just one! As in other analytical fields, interlaboratory comparisons play an important role in the chemical industry. Collaborative trials or method performance studies do have a long tradition in this field. Sometimes they were designed as laboratory performance studies with the clear aim of making analytical results comparable, e.g. petrol, coal, gas, noble metals analyses – not to mention the biggest PT scheme run on a daily world-wide basis – trade itself. All this is an ongoing process, which started long before the idea of assessing and accrediting the performance of analytical laboratories was born. However, when striving for accreditation in 1996, the analytical production laboratories of the Chemicals Business Unit of the Bayer AG in Germany implemented another facet of PT schemes. In-house-PT schemes are performed regularly and turned out to be useful in evaluating, monitoring, and thus improving, the quality of routine analytical work. Received: 5 December 2000 Accepted: 15 January 2001     

Measurement uncertainty of food carotenoid determination

For consistent interpretation of an analytical method result it is necessary to evaluate the confidence that can be placed in it, in the form of a measurement uncertainty estimate. The Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement issued by ISO establishes rules for evaluating and expressing uncertainty. Carotenoid determination in food is a complex analytical process involving several mass transfer steps (extraction, evaporation, saponification, etc.), making difficult the application of these guidelines. The ISO guide was interpreted for analytical chemistry by EURACHEM, which includes the possibility of using intra- and interlaboratory information. Measurement uncertainty was estimated based on laboratory validation data, including precision and method performance studies, and also, based on laboratory participation in proficiency tests. These methods of uncertainty estimation were applied to analytical results of different food matrices of fruits and vegetables. Measurement uncertainty of food carotenoid determination was 10–30% of the composition value in the great majority of cases. Higher values were found for measurements near instrumental quantification limits (e.g. 75% for β-cryptoxanthin, and 99% for lutein, in pear) or when sample chromatograms presented interferences with the analyte peak (e.g. 44% for α-carotene in orange). Lower relative expanded measurement uncertainty values (3–13%) were obtained for food matrices/analytes not requiring the saponification step. Based on these results, the saponification step should be avoided if food carotenoids are not present in the ester form. Food carotenoid content should be expressed taking into account the measurement uncertainty; therefore the maximum number of significant figures of a result should be 2.