Structural properties of a series of photochromic fluorinated indolylfulgides

Fluorinated indolyl­fulgides are a class of photochromic organic compounds that meet many of the requirements for use as optical memory media and optical switches. The X‐ray crystal structures of a series of five photochromic fluorinated indolyl­fulgides have been determined, namely (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐di­methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,2‐tri­fluoro­ethyl­idene]‐4‐(1‐methyl­ethyl­idene)­dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (tri­fluoro­methyl­iso­propyl­idene­indolyl­fulgide), C₁₉H₁₆F₃NO₃, (I), (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐dimethyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,3,3,3‐penta­fluoro­propyl­idene]‐4‐(1‐methyl­ethyl­idene)­dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (penta­fluoro­ethyl­iso­propyl­idene­indolyl­fulgide), C₂₀H₁₆F₅NO₃, (II), (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐di­methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,3,3,4,4,4‐hepta­fluoro­butyl­idene]‐4‐(1‐methyl­ethyl­idene)­dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (hepta­fluoro­propyl­iso­propyl­idene­indolyl­fulgide), C₂₁H₁₆F₇NO₃, (III), (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐di­methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,2‐tri­fluoro­ethyl­idene]‐4‐(tri­cyclo­[3.3.1.1^3,7]­decyl­idene­)dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (tri­fluoro­methyl­adamantyl­idene­indolyl­fulgide), C₂₆H₂₄F₃NO₃, (IV), and (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐di­methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,3,3,4,4,4‐hepta­fluoro­butyl­idene]‐4‐(tri­cyclo­[3.3.1.1^3,7]­decyl­idene­)dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (hepta­fluoro­propyl­adamantylidenein­dolyl­fulgide), C₂₈H₂₄F₇NO₃, (V). The photochromic property of fulgides is based on the photochemically allowed electrocyclic ring closure of a hexatriene system to form a cyclo­hexa­diene. For each fulgide examined, the bond lengths within the hexatriene system alternate between short and long, as expected. Comparing the structures of the five fulgides with each other demonstrates no significant difference in bond lengths, bond angles or dihedral angles within the hexatriene systems. The distance between the bond‐forming C atoms at each end of the hexatriene system does vary. Correlations of structural properties with optical properties are addressed.     

Geometry and bond‐length alternation in nonlinear optical materials. I. Standard parameters in two precursors

2‐{3‐Cyano‐4‐[4‐(N‐formylanilino)‐trans‐1,3‐butadienyl]‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐dihydrofuran‐2‐ylidene}propanedinitrile, C₂₂H₁₈N₄O₂, (I), and 2‐{3‐cyano‐4‐[6‐(N‐formylanilino)‐trans,trans‐1,3,5‐hexatrienyl]‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐dihydrofuran‐2‐ylidene}propanedinitrile, C₂₄H₂₀N₄O₂, (II), show the alternating single/double‐bond behaviour of push–pull chromophores. In the two structures, the planar polyene chains are twisted with respect to the furanylidene ring by 18.2 (2) and 12.4 (2)°, respectively. Comparison with structures of related and parent molecules shows subtle but consistent bond‐length variations consistent with charge‐delocalized structures. Crystal cohesion is provided by various sets of hydrogen bonds, viz. C—H_methyl...N_cyano and bifurcated (C=C—H)₂...O=C in (I), and C—H_{methyl/phenyl}...O and C=C—H...N_cyano in (II).     

Four N7‐alkoxybenzyl‐substituted 4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐b]pyridine‐5‐spiro‐1′‐cyclohexane‐2′,6′‐diones: hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular structures in zero,one, two or three dimensions

3‐tert‐Butyl‐7‐(4‐methoxybenzyl)‐4′,4′‐dimethyl‐1‐phenyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐b]pyridine‐5‐spiro‐1′‐cyclohexane‐2′,6′‐dione, C₃₁H₃₇N₃O₃, (I), 3‐tert‐butyl‐7‐(2,3‐dimethoxybenzyl)‐4′,4′‐dimethyl‐1‐phenyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐b]pyridine‐5‐spiro‐1′‐cyclohexane‐2′,6′‐dione, C₃₂H₃₉N₃O₄, (II), 3‐tert‐butyl‐4′,4′‐dimethyl‐7‐(3,4‐methylenedioxybenzyl)‐1‐phenyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐b]pyridine‐5‐spiro‐1′‐cyclohexane‐2′,6′‐dione, C₃₁H₃₅N₃O₄, (III), and 3‐tert‐butyl‐4′,4′‐dimethyl‐1‐phenyl‐7‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzyl)‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐b]pyridine‐5‐spiro‐1′‐cyclohexane‐2′,6′‐dione ethanol 0.67‐solvate, C₃₃H₄₁N₃O₅·0.67C₂H₆O, (IV), all contain reduced pyridine rings having half‐chair conformations. The molecules of (I) and (II) are linked into centrosymmetric dimers and simple chains, respectively, by C—H...O hydrogen bonds, augmented only in (I) by a C—H...π hydrogen bond. The molecules of (III) are linked by a combination of C—H...O and C—H...π hydrogen bonds into a chain of edge‐fused centrosymmetric rings, further linked by weak hydrogen bonds into supramolecular arrays in two or three dimensions. The heterocyclic molecules in (IV) are linked by two independent C—H...O hydrogen bonds into sheets, from which the partial‐occupancy ethanol molecules are pendent. The significance of this study lies in its finding of a very wide range of supramolecular aggregation modes dependent on rather modest changes in the peripheral substituents remote from the main hydrogen‐bond acceptor sites.     

Intermolecular C—H...O and C—H...X interactions in substituted spiroacenaphthylene structures

In the three spiroacenaphthylene structures 5′′‐[(E)‐2,3‐dichlorobenzylidene]‐7′‐(2,3‐dichlorophenyl)‐1′′‐methyldispiro[acenaphthylene‐1,5′‐pyrrolo[1,2‐c][1,3]thiazole‐6′,3′′‐piperidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₃₅H₂₆Cl₄N₂O₂S, (I), 5′′‐[(E)‐4‐fluorobenzylidene]‐7′‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐1′′‐methyldispiro[acenaphthylene‐1,5′‐pyrrolo[1,2‐c][1,3]thiazole‐6′,3′′‐piperidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₃₅H₂₈F₂N₂O₂S, (II), and 5′′‐[(E)‐4‐bromobenzylidene]‐7′‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐1′′‐methyldispiro[acenaphthylene‐1,5′‐pyrrolo[1,2‐c][1,3]thiazole‐6′,3′′‐piperidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₃₅H₂₈Br₂N₂O₂S, (III), the substituted aryl groups are 2,3‐dichloro‐, 4‐fluoro‐ and 4‐bromophenyl, respectively. The six‐membered piperidine ring in all three structures adopts a half‐chair conformation, the thiazolidine ring adopts a slightly twisted envelope and the pyrrolidine ring an envelope conformation; in each case, the C atom linking the rings is the flap atom. In all three structures, weak intramolecular C—H...O interactions are present. The crystal packing is stabilized through a number of intermolecular C—H...O and C—H...X interactions, where X = Cl in (I) and F or S in (II), and C—H...O interactions are observed predominantly in (III). In all three structures, molecules are linked through centrosymmetric ring motifs, further tailored through a relay of C—H...X [Cl in (I), Br in (II) and O in (III)] interactions.     

A Simple and Efficient Process for the Synthesis of Novel Heterocycles Containing Benzofuran Moiety Using Thiocarbohydrazide as a Precursor

A simple and efficient process for the synthesis of novel heterocycles starting from thiocarbohydrazide was reported. Reaction of 2‐acetylbenzofuran ( 1 ) and thiocarbohydrazide ( 2 ) in ethanol containing acetic acid produced the corresponding thiocarbohydrazone 3 in 86% yield. Reaction of 3 and isatin ( 4 ) gave N,2‐bis(2‐oxoindolin‐3‐ylidene)hydrazine‐1‐carbothiohydrazine ( 6 ) in 65% yield, rather than the expected product, 3‐[(1‐methyl‐1‐benzofur‐2‐ylmethylidene)amino]‐1‐{[(3Z)‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐indol‐3‐ylidene]amino}thiourea ( 5 ). Reaction of 2‐((3‐(benzofuran‐2‐yl)‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)methylene)hydrazine carbothioamide ( 9 ) and chloroacetic acid or hydrazonoyl chloride 11 in basic medium gave (Z)‐2‐((E)‐((3‐(benzofuran‐2‐yl)‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)methylene)hydrazono)thiazolidin‐4‐one ( 10 ) or 2‐((E)‐2‐((3‐(benzofuran‐2‐yl)‐1‐ phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)methylene)hydrazinyl)‐4‐((E)‐(4‐fluorophenyl)diazenyl)‐5‐methylthiazole ( 12 ) in 62% or 74%, respectively.     

A structural study of 4‐aminoantipyrine and six of its Schiff base derivatives

Six derivatives of 4‐amino‐1,5‐dimethyl‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐one (4‐aminoantipyrine), C₁₁H₁₃N₃O, (I), have been synthesized and structurally characterized to investigate the changes in the observed hydrogen‐bonding motifs compared to the original 4‐aminoantipyrine. The derivatives were synthesized from the reactions of 4‐aminoantipyrine with various aldehyde‐, ketone‐ and ester‐containing molecules, producing (Z)‐methyl 3‐[(1,5‐dimethyl‐3‐oxo‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)amino]but‐2‐enoate, C₁₆H₁₉N₃O₃, (II), (Z)‐ethyl 3‐[(1,5‐dimethyl‐3‐oxo‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)amino]but‐2‐enoate, C₁₇H₂₁N₃O₃, (III), ethyl 2‐[(1,5‐dimethyl‐3‐oxo‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)amino]cyclohex‐1‐enecarboxylate, C₂₀H₂₅N₃O₃, (IV), (Z)‐ethyl 3‐[(1,5‐dimethyl‐3‐oxo‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)amino]‐3‐phenylacrylate, C₂₂H₂₃N₃O₃, (V), 2‐cyano‐N‐(1,5‐dimethyl‐3‐oxo‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)acetamide, C₁₄H₁₄N₄O₂, (VI), and (E)‐methyl 4‐{[(1,5‐dimethyl‐3‐oxo‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)amino]methyl}benzoate, C₂₀H₁₉N₃O₃, (VII). The asymmetric units of all these compounds have one molecule on a general position. The hydrogen bonding in (I) forms chains of molecules via intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds around a crystallographic sixfold screw axis. In contrast, the formation of enamines for all derived compounds except (VII) favours the formation of a six‐membered intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded ring in (II)–(V) and an intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond in (VI), whereas there is an intramolecular C—H...O hydrogen bond in the structure of imine (VII). All the reported compounds, except for (II), feature π–π interactions, while C—H...π interactions are observed in (II), C—H...O interactions are observed in (I), (III), (V) and (VI), and a C—O...π interaction is observed in (II).     

Crystal structures of five new substituted tetrahydro‐1‐benzazepines with potential antiparasitic activity

Tetrahydro‐1‐benzazepines have been described as potential antiparasitic drugs for the treatment of chagas disease and leishmaniasis, two of the most important so‐called `forgotten tropical diseases' affecting South and Central America, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania chagasi parasites, respectively. Continuing our extensive work describing the structural characteristics of some related compounds with interesting biological properties, the crystallographic features of three epoxy‐1‐benzazepines, namely (2SR,4RS)‐6,8‐dimethyl‐2‐(naphthalen‐1‐yl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐1,4‐epoxy‐1‐benzazepine, (1), (2SR,4RS)‐6,9‐dimethyl‐2‐(naphthalen‐1‐yl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐1,4‐epoxy‐1‐benzazepine, (2), and (2SR,4RS)‐8,9‐dimethyl‐2‐(naphthalen‐1‐yl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐1,4‐epoxy‐1‐benzazepine, (3), all C₂₂H₂₁NO, and two 1‐benzazepin‐4‐ols, namely 7‐fluoro‐cis‐2‐[(E)‐styryl]‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐1‐benzazepin‐4‐ol, C₁₈H₁₈FNO, (4), and 7‐fluoro‐cis‐2‐[(E)‐pent‐1‐enyl]‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐1‐benzazepin‐4‐ol, C₁₅H₂₀FNO, (5), are described. Some peculiarities in the crystallization behaviour were found, involving significant variations in the crystalline structures as a result of modest changes in the peripheral substituents in (1)–(3) and the occurrence of discrete disorder due to the molecular overlay of enantiomers with more than one conformation in (5). In particular, an interesting phase change on cooling was observed for compound (5), accompanied by an approximate fourfold increase of the unit‐cell volume and a change of the Z′ value from 1 to 4. This transition is a consequence of the partial ordering of the pentenyl chains in half of the molecules breaking half of the symmetry axes observed in the room‐temperature structure of (5). The structural assembly in all the title compounds is characterized by not only (N,O)—H…(O,N) hydrogen bonds, but also by unconventional C—H…O contacts, resulting in a wide diversity of packing.     

Five pseudopolymorphs and a cocrystal of nitrofurantoin

The antibiotic nitrofurantoin {systematic name: (E)‐1‐[(5‐nitro‐2‐furyl)methylideneamino]imidazolidine‐2,4‐dione} is not only used for the treatment of urinary tract infections, but also illegally applied as an animal food additive. Since derivatives of 2,6‐diaminopyridine might serve as artificial receptors for its recognition, we crystallized one potential drug–receptor complex, nitrofurantoin–2,6‐diacetamidopyridine (1/1), C₈H₆N₄O₅·C₉H₁₁N₃O₂, (I·II). It is characterized by one N—H...N and two N—H...O hydrogen bonds and confirms a previous NMR study. During the crystallization screening, several new pseudopolymorphs of both components were obtained, namely a nitrofurantoin dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₈H₆N₄O₅·C₂H₆OS, (Ia), a nitrofurantoin dimethyl sulfoxide hemisolvate, C₈H₆N₄O₅·0.5C₂H₆OS, (Ib), two nitrofurantoin dimethylacetamide monosolvates, C₈H₆N₄O₅·C₄H₉NO, (Ic) and (Id), and a nitrofurantoin dimethylacetamide disolvate, C₈H₆N₄O₅·2C₄H₉NO, (Ie), as well as a 2,6‐diacetamidopyridine dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₁₁N₃O₂·C₃H₇NO, (IIa). Of these, (Ia), (Ic) and (Id) were formed during cocrystallization attempts with 1‐(4‐fluorophenyl)biguanide hydrochloride. Obviously nitrofurantoin prefers the higher‐energy conformation in the crystal structures, which all exhibit N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen‐bond interactions. The latter are especially important for the crystal packing. 2,6‐Diacetamidopyridine shows some conformational flexibility depending on the hydrogen‐bond pattern.     

Geometry and bond‐length alternation in nonlinear optical materials. III. Structural parameters of two chromophores containing aromatizable donors

The planar component of 2‐{3‐cyano‐4‐[3‐(1‐decyl‐1,4‐dihydroquinolin‐4‐ylidene)prop‐1‐enyl]‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐dihydrofuran‐2‐ylidene}malononitrile, C₃₂H₄₆N₄O, (I), forms into layers parallel to the (01) plane. The larger of the two spaces between layers is filled by the alkyl chains, giving a `sandwich stack' appearance. The packing of 2‐{3‐cyano‐4‐[5‐(1‐decyl‐1,4‐dihydroquinolin‐4‐ylidene)penta‐1,3‐dienyl]‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐dihydrofuran‐2‐ylidene}malononitrile, C<sub>34</sub>H<sub>38</sub>N<sub>4</sub>O, (II), which has partial disorder in the 1‐decyl group, utilizes weak C—H...N, C—H...O and C—N...π interactions in a three‐dimensional `herring‐bone' array with molecular segments parallel to the (111) and (1) planes. Different rotational isomers with respect to the polyene chain and the 5,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐dihydrofuran‐2‐ylidene link are observed in the two structures. The significance of the study lies in the delocalization of charge along the polyene chain and the supramolecular aggregation present, which highlight the difficulty in obtaining the noncentrosymmetric alignment required for high nonlinear optical (NLO) responses in zwitterionic chromophores.     

A combinatorial chemistry approach to new materials for non‐linear optics. I. Five Schiff bases

A combinatorial chemistry approach has been used to synthesize an array of Schiff bases, five of which, namely N‐[(E,2E)‐3‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐3‐nitro­aniline, C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₃, (1a), N‐[(E,2E)‐3‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐4‐nitro­aniline, C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₃, (2a), N‐{(E,2E)‐3‐[4‐(di­methyl­amino)­phenyl]‐2‐propenyl­idene}‐3‐nitro­aniline, C₁₇H₁₇N₃O₂, (1b), N‐{(E,2E)‐3‐[4‐(di­methyl­amino)­phenyl]‐2‐propenyl­idene}‐4‐nitro­aniline, C₁₇H₁₇N₃O₂, (2b), and N‐{(E,2E)‐3‐[4‐(di­methyl­amino)­phenyl]‐2‐propenyl­idene}‐2‐methyl‐4‐nitro­aniline, C₁₈H₁₉N₃O₂, (3b), have been structurally characterized. A stack structure is observed for (1a) and (1b) in the crystal phase. Experimental and calculated molecular structures are discussed for these compounds which belong to a chemical class having potential applications as non‐linear optical materials.     

Efficient Synthesis of Dialkyl (2Z)‐2‐[(E)‐1‐Aryl‐2‐(3‐arylquinoxalin‐2‐yl)ethenyl]but‐2‐enedioates

The reaction of dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylates 4 with 1‐aryl‐2‐[(3‐arylquinoxalin‐2(1H)‐ylidene)ethanones 3 in the presence of Ph₃P leads to dialkyl (2Z)‐2‐[(E)‐1‐aryl‐2‐(3‐arylquinoxalin‐2‐yl)ethenyl]but‐2‐enedioates 1 in good yields.     

Hydrogen‐bonding patterns in enaminones: (2Z)‐1‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐2‐ylidene)ethanone and its piperidin‐2‐ylidene and azepan‐2‐ylidene analogues

The title compounds, namely (2Z)‐1‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐2‐ylidene)ethanone, C₁₂H₁₂BrNO, (I), (2Z)‐1‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐2‐(piperidin‐2‐ylidene)ethanone, C₁₃H₁₄BrNO, (II), and (2Z)‐2‐(azepan‐2‐ylidene)‐1‐(4‐bromophenyl)ethanone, C₁₄H₁₆BrNO, (III), are characterized by bifurcated intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the secondary amine and carbonyl groups. The former establishes a six‐membered hydrogen‐bonded ring, while the latter leads to the formation of centrosymmetric dimers. Weak C—H...Br interactions link the individual molecules into chains that run along the [011], [101] and [101] directions in (I)–(III), respectively. Additional weak Br...O, C—H...π and C—H...O interactions further stabilize the crystal structures.     

4‐(9,10‐Dihydroacridin‐9‐ylidene)thiosemicarbazide and its five‐membered thiazole and six‐membered thiazine derivatives

Two methyl derivatives, five‐membered methyl 2‐{2‐[2‐(9,10‐dihydroacridin‐9‐ylidene)‐1‐methylhydrazinyl]‐4‐oxo‐4,5‐dihydro‐1,3‐thiazol‐5‐ylidene}acetate, C₂₀H₁₆N₄O₃S, (I), and six‐membered 2‐[2‐(9,10‐dihydroacridin‐9‐ylidene)‐1‐methylhydrazinyl]‐4H‐1,3‐thiazin‐4‐one, C₁₈H₁₄N₄OS, (II), were prepared by the reaction of the N‐methyl derivative of 4‐(9,10‐dihydroacridin‐9‐ylidene)thiosemicarbazide, C₁₄H₁₂N₄S, (III), with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate and methyl propiolate, respectively. The crystal structures of (I), (II) and (III) are molecular and can be considered in two parts: (i) the nearly planar acridine moiety and (ii) the singular heterocyclic ring portion [thiazolidine for (I) and thiazine for (II)] including the linking amine and imine N atoms and the methyl C atom, or the full side chain in the case of (III). The structures of (I) and (II) are stabilized by N—H...O hydrogen bonds and different π–π interactions between acridine moieties and thiazolidine and thiazine rings, respectively.     

Nouveaux dérivés de N‐phtalimido‐2‐arylepropanoate de pantolactonyle

We present the crystal and molecular structures of two new N‐phthalyl‐3‐amino‐2‐arylpropionic acid pantolactonyl ester derivatives with 4‐fluorophenyl and 3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl as the aryl group, 2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐4,4‐dimethyl‐2‐oxofuran‐3‐yl 3‐phthalimido‐2‐(4‐fluorophenyl)propanoate, C₂₃H₂₀FNO₆, and 2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐4,4‐dimethyl‐2‐oxofuran‐3‐yl 3‐phthalimido‐2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)propanoate ethyl acetate hemisolvate, C₂₅H₂₅NO₈·0.5C₄H₈O₂. This structural study confirms the S configuration of the C2 and validates the stereospecificity of our synthesis strategy.     

A 2:1 sulfamethazine–theophylline cocrystal exhibiting two tautomers of sulfamethazine

In the title cocrystal, 4‐amino‐N‐(4,6‐dimethylpyrimidin‐2‐yl)benzenesulfonamide–4‐amino‐N‐(4,6‐dimethyl‐1,2‐dihydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)benzenesulfonamide–1,3‐dimethyl‐7H‐purine‐2,6‐dione (1/1/1), C₇H₈N₄O₂·2C₁₂H₁₄N₄O₂S, two sulfamethazine molecules cocrystallize with a single molecule of theophylline. Each molecule of sulfamethazine forms a hydrogen‐bonded ribbon along the b axis crosslinked by further hydrogen bonding. The two sulfamethazine molecules exhibit a hydrogen‐shift isomerization so that the crystal structure contains both tautomeric forms. Calculation of their relative energies showed that the tautomer protonated at the chain N atom is considerably more stable than the one where an N atom in the aromatic ring is protonated. The latter, here observed for the first time, is stabilized through strong intermolecular interactions with the theophylline molecules.     

Regio‐ and stereospecific assembly of dispiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine‐1′,5′′‐thiazolidines] from simple precursors using a one‐pot procedure: synthesis,spectroscopic and structural characterization,and a proposed mechanism of formation

The synthesis and characterization of three new dispiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine‐1′,5′′‐thiazolidine] compounds are reported, together with the crystal structures of two of them. (3RS,1′SR,2′SR,7a′SR)‐2′‐(4‐Chlorophenyl)‐1‐hexyl‐2′′‐sulfanylidene‐5′,6′,7′,7a′‐tetrahydro‐2′H‐dispiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine‐1′,5′′‐thiazolidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₂₈H₃₀ClN₃O₂S₂, (I), (3RS,1′SR,2′SR,7a′SR)‐2′‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐1‐benzyl‐5‐methyl‐2′′‐sulfanylidene‐5′,6′,7′,7a′‐tetrahydro‐2′H‐dispiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine‐1′,5′′‐thiazolidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₃₀H₂₆ClN₃O₂S₂, (II), and (3RS,1′SR,2′SR,7a′SR)‐2′‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐5‐fluoro‐2′′‐sulfanylidene‐5′,6′,7′,7a′‐tetrahydro‐2′H‐dispiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine‐1′,5′′‐thiazolidine]‐2,4′′‐dione, C₂₂H₁₇ClFN₃O₂S₂, (III), were each isolated as a single regioisomer using a one‐pot reaction involving l ‐proline, a substituted isatin and (Z)‐5‐(4‐chlorobenzylidene)‐2‐sulfanylidenethiazolidin‐4‐one [5‐(4‐chlorobenzylidene)rhodanine]. The compositions of (I)–(III) were established by elemental analysis, complemented by high‐resolution mass spectrometry in the case of (I); their constitutions, including the definition of the regiochemistry, were established using NMR spectroscopy, and the relative configurations at the four stereogenic centres were established using single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis. A possible reaction mechanism for the formation of (I)–(III) is proposed, based on the detailed stereochemistry. The molecules of (I) are linked into simple chains by a single N—H…N hydrogen bond, those of (II) are linked into a chain of rings by a combination of N—H…O and C—H…S=C hydrogen bonds, and those of (III) are linked into sheets by a combination of N—H…N and N—H…S=C hydrogen bonds.     

Thieno[2,3‐d]pyrimidines in the Synthesis of New Fused Heterocyclic Compounds of Prospective Antitumor and Antioxidant Agents (Part II)

Diethyl azodicarboxylate and 3,4,5,6‐tetrachloro‐1,2‐benzoquinone react with cyclopentano‐ and cycloheptano‐fused thienopyrimidines to form the oxidative dimer of the starting material via S—S bond formation. Reaction of two equivalents of 2,2′‐(cyclohexa‐2′,5′‐diene‐1,4‐diylidene)dimalononitrile with thienopyrimidines afforded 3‐(4′,4′‐dicyanomethylene‐cycloalka[a]‐2,5‐dienyl)‐4‐oxo‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐cyclo‐hepta[4,5]‐[1,3]thiazolo[3,2‐a]‐thieno[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐2‐ylidene‐2‐dicarbonitriles. The thioenopyrimidines react with 2‐[1,3‐dioxo‐1H‐inden‐2(3H)‐ylidene]malononitrile to produce 1,3,5′‐trioxo‐1,3,3′,5′‐tetrahydrospiro‐(indene‐2,2′‐thiazolo[2,3‐b]‐cycloalkyl[b]‐thieno[2,3‐d]pyrimidine)‐3′‐carbonitriles. However, the reaction of thienopyrimidines with 2,3‐dicyano‐1,4‐naphthoquinone proceeded to afford the fused cycloalkyl‐thieno form of naphtho[1,3]thiazolo[3,2‐a]thieno[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐6.7,12‐triones. Reaction of 2‐hydrazino‐5,6,7,8‐tetrahydrobenzo[b]thieno[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐4(1H)‐one with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate and ethyl propiolate, respectively, afforded cyclohexano‐fused (Z)‐dimethyl 2[(E)‐4‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydrothieno[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐2(1H)‐ylidene)hydrazono]succinate and thieno‐pyrimidinotriazine. Both oxidative dimers of thienopyrimidines showed high inhibition of Hep‐G2 cell growth compared with the growth of untreated control cells. Moreover, the cycloheptano‐fused thiazinothienopyrimidine indicates a promising specific antitumor agent against Hep‐G2 cells because its IC₅₀ is < 20 μM.     

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions in xanthenedione derivatives

The existence of intermolecular interactions and the conformational geometry adopted by molecules are related to biological activity. Xanthenedione molecules are promising and emerging antioxidants and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. To examine the role of different functional groups involved in the intermolecular interactions and conformational geometries adopted in xanthenediones, a series of three substituted xanthenediones have been crystallized [9‐(3‐hydroxyphenyl)‐3,3,6,6‐tetramethyl‐3,4,5,6,7,9‐hexahydro‐1H‐xanthene‐1,8(2H)‐dione, C₂₃H₂₆O₄, 9‐(5‐bromo‐2‐methoxyphenyl)‐3,3,6,6‐tetramethyl‐3,4,6,7‐tetrahydro‐2H‐xanthene‐1,8(5H,9H)‐dione, C₂₄H₂₇BrO₄, and 3,3,6,6‐tetramethyl‐9‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐3,4,6,7‐tetrahydro‐2H‐xanthene‐1,8(5H,9H)‐dione, C₂₂H₂₅NO₃] and their intermolecular interactions analyzed via Hirshfeld analysis. The results show that all the derivatives adopt the same structural conformation, where the central ring has a shallow boat conformation and the outer rings have a twisted boat conformation. The intermolecular interactions in the molecules are predominantly O—H…O, C—H…O and π–π interactions. The optimized structures of the derivatives from theoretical B3LYP/6‐311G** calculations show a good correlation with the experimental structures. The lattice energy involved in the intermolecular interactions has been explored using PIXELC.     

Synthesis,crystal structure studies and solvatochromic behaviour of two 2‐{5‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyl]penta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐ylidene}malononitrile derivatives

The synthesis, crystal structure studies and solvatochromic behavior of 2‐{(2E,4E)‐5‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyl]penta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐ylidene}malononitrile, C₁₆H₁₅N₃ (DCV[3]), and 2‐{(2E,4E,6E)‐7‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyl]hepta‐2,4,6‐trien‐1‐ylidene}malononitrile, C₁₈H₁₇N₃ (DCV[4]), are reported and discussed in comparison with their homologs having a shorter length of the π‐conjugated bridge. The compounds of this series have potential use as nonlinear materials with second‐order effects due to their donor–acceptor structures. However, DCV[3] and DCV[4] crystallized in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c which excludes their application as nonlinear optical materials in the crystalline state. They both crystallize with two independent molecules having the same molecular conformation in the asymmetric unit. The series DCV[1]–DCV[4] demonstrated reversed solvatochromic behavior in toluene, chloroform, and acetonitrile.