On shakedown theory for elastic-plastic materials and extensions

The idea that an elastic-plastic structure under given loading history may shake down to some purely elastic state (and hence to a safe state) after a finite amount of initial plastic deformation, can apply to many sophisticated material models with possible allowable changes of additional material characteristics, as has been done in the literature. Despite some claims to the contrary, it is shown; however, that the shakedown theorems in a Melan-Koiter path-independent sense have been extended successfully only for certain elastic-plastic hardening materials of practical significance. Shakedown of kinematic hardening material is determined by the ultimate and initial yield stresses, not the generally plastic deformation history-dependent hardening curve between. The initial yield stress is no longer the convenient one (corresponding to the plastic deformation at the level of 0.2%) as in usual elastic-plastic analysis but to be related to the shakedown safety requirement of the structure and should be as small as the fatigue limit for arbitrary high-cycle loading. Though the ultimate yield strength is well defined in the standard monotonic loading experiment, it also should be reduced to the so-called “high-cycle ratchetting” stress for the path-independent shakedown analysis. A reduced simple form of the shakedown kinematic theorem without time integrals is conjectured for general practical uses. Application of the theorem is illustrated by examples for a hollow cylinder, sphere, and a clamped disk, under variable (including quasiperiodic dynamic) pressure.     

On shakedown analysis in hardening plasticity

The extension of classical shakedown theorems for hardening plasticity is interesting from both theoretical and practical aspects of the theory of plasticity. This problem has been much discussed in the literature. In particular, the model of generalized standard materials gives a convenient framework to derive appropriate results for common models of plasticity with strain-hardening. This paper gives a comprehensive presentation of the subject, in particular, on general results which can be obtained in this framework. The extension of the static shakedown theorem to hardening plasticity is presented at first. It leads by min-max duality to the definition of dual static and kinematic safety coefficients in hardening plasticity. Dual static and kinematic approaches are discussed for common models of isotropic hardening of limited or unlimited kinematic hardening. The kinematic approach also suggests for these models the introduction of a relaxed kinematic coefficient following a method due to Koiter. Some models for soils such as the Cam-clay model are discussed in the same spirit for applications in geomechanics. In particular, new appropriate results concerning the variational expressions of the dual kinematic coefficients are obtained.     

A mathematical basis for strain-gradient plasticity theory. Part II: Tensorial plastic multiplier

A phenomenological, flow theory version of gradient plasticity for isotropic and anisotropic solids is constructed along the lines of Gudmundson [Gudmundson, P., 2004. A unified treatment of strain-gradient plasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 52, 1379-1406]. Both energetic and dissipative stresses are considered in order to develop a kinematic hardening theory, which in the absence of gradient terms reduces to conventional J₂ flow theory with kinematic hardening. The dissipative stress measures, work-conjugate to plastic strain and its gradient, satisfy a yield condition with associated plastic flow. The theory includes interfacial terms: elastic energy is stored and plastic work is dissipated at internal interfaces, and a yield surface is postulated for the work-conjugate stress quantities at the interface. Uniqueness and extremum principles are constructed for the solution of boundary value problems, for both the rate-dependent and the rate-independent cases. In the absence of strain gradient and interface effects, the minimum principles reduce to the classical extremum principles for a kinematically hardening elasto-plastic solid. A rigid-hardening version of the theory is also stated and the resulting theory gives rise to an extension to the classical limit load theorems. This has particular appeal as previous trial fields for limit load analysis can be used to generate immediately size-dependent bounds on limit loads.     

Shakedown analysis for a class of strengthening materials within the framework of gradient plasticity

The classical shakedown theory is extended to a class of perfectly plastic materials with strengthening effects (Hall–Petch effects). To this aim, a strain gradient plasticity model previously advanced by Polizzotto (2010) is used, whereby a featuring strengthening law provides the strengthening stress, i.e. the increase of the yield strength produced by plastic deformation, as a degree-zero homogeneous second-order differential form in the accumulated plastic strain with associated higher order boundary conditions. The extended static (Melan) and kinematic (Koiter) shakedown theorems are proved together with the related lower bound and upper bound theorems. The shakedown limit load problem is addressed and discussed in the present context, and its solution uniqueness shown out. A simple micro-scale structural system is considered as an illustrative example. The shakedown limit load is shown to increase with decreasing the structural size, which is a manifestation of the classical Hall–Petch effects in a context of cyclic loading.     

Shakedown reduced kinematic formulation,separated collapse modes,and numerical implementation

Our shakedown reduced kinematic formulation is developed to solve some typical plane stress problems, using finite element method. Whenever the comparisons are available, our results agree with the available ones in the literature. The advantage of our approach is its simplicity, computational effectiveness, and the separation of collapse modes for possible different treatments. Second-order cone programming developed for kinematic plastic limit analysis is effectively implemented to study the incremental plasticity collapse mode. The approach is ready to be used to solve general shakedown problems, including those for elastic–plastic kinematic hardening materials and under dynamic loading.     

Strain gradient plasticity,strengthening effects and plastic limit analysis

Within the framework of isotropic strain gradient plasticity, a rate-independent constitutive model exhibiting size dependent hardening is formulated and discussed with particular concern to its strengthening behavior. The latter is modelled as a (fictitious) isotropic hardening featured by a potential which is a positively degree-one homogeneous function of the effective plastic strain and its gradient. This potential leads to a strengthening law in which the strengthening stress, i.e. the increase of the plastically undeformed material initial yield stress, is related to the effective plastic strain through a second order PDE and related higher order boundary conditions. The plasticity flow laws, with the role there played by the strengthening stress, are addressed and shown to admit a maximum dissipation principle. For an idealized elastic perfectly plastic material with strengthening effects, the plastic collapse load problem of a micro/nano scale structure is addressed and its basic features under the light of classical plastic limit analysis are pointed out. It is found that the conceptual framework of classical limit analysis, including the notion of rigid-plastic behavior, remains valid. The lower bound and upper bound theorems of classical limit analysis are extended to strengthening materials. A static-type maximum principle and a kinematic-type minimum principle, consequences of the lower and upper bound theorems, respectively, are each independently shown to solve the collapse load problem. These principles coincide with their respective classical counterparts in the case of simple material. Comparisons with existing theories are provided. An application of this nonclassical plastic limit analysis to a simple shear model is also presented, in which the plastic collapse load is shown to increase with the decreasing sample size (Hall–Petch size effects).     

Shakedown theorems for elastic–plastic solids in the framework of gradient plasticity

Static and kinematic shakedown theorems are given for a class of generalized standard materials endowed with a hardening saturation surface in the framework of strain gradient plasticity. The so-called residual-based gradient plasticity theory is employed. The hardening law admits a hardening potential, which is a C¹-continuous function of a set of kinematic internal variables and of their spatial gradients, and is required to satisfy a global sign restriction (but not to be necessarily convex). The totally produced, the accumulated and the freely moving dislocations per unit volume, distinguished as statistically stored and geometrically necessary ones, are in this way accounted for. Like for a generalized standard material, the shakedown safety factor is found to depend on the (generally size dependent) yield and saturation limits, but not on the particular differential-type hardening law of the material.     

Variational methods for the steady state response of elastic–plastic solids subjected to cyclic loads

Solids (or structures) of elastic–plastic internal variable material models and subjected to cyclic loads are considered. A minimum net resistant power theorem, direct consequence of the classical maximum intrinsic dissipation theorem of plasticity theory, is envisioned which describes the material behavior by determining the plastic flow mechanism (if any) corresponding to a given stress/hardening state. A maximum principle is provided which characterizes the optimal initial stress/hardening state of a cyclically loaded structure as the one such that the plastic strain and kinematic internal variable increments produced over a cycle are kinematically admissible. A steady cycle minimum principle, integrated form of the aforementioned minimum net resistant power theorem, is provided, which characterizes the structure’s steady state response (steady cycle) and proves to be an extension to the present context of known principles of perfect plasticity. The optimality equations of this minimum principle are studied and two particular cases are considered: (i) loads not exceeding the shakedown limit (so recovering known results of shakedown theory) and (ii) specimen under uniform cyclic stress (or strain). Criteria to assess the structure’s ratchet limit loads are given. These, together with some insensitivity features of the structure’s alternating plasticity state, provide the basis to the ratchet limit load analysis problem, for which solution procedures are discussed.     

Plastic collapse of a circular plate under cyclic loads

The shakedown kinematic approach is used to analyze the collapse modes for a circular plate subjected to cyclic loads distributed axisymmetrically. Depending upon the loading scheme and parameters, the plate may fail by instantaneous, incremental, or alternating plasticity collapse. For quasistatic processes the nonshakedown load may be smaller than the instantaneous plastic limit load. In the case of periodic dynamic loading, which lies outside the framework of plastic limit analysis, the frequency parameter, besides the load amplitudes, can significantly influence the nonshakedown behavior of the plate.     

Application of the kinematical shakedown theorem to rolling and sliding point contacts

In the plane-strain conditions of a long cylinder in rolling line contact with an elastic-perfectly-plastic half-space an exact shakedown limit has been established previously by use of both the statical (lower bound) and kinematical (upper bound) shakedown theorems. At loads above this limit incremental strain growth or “ratchetting” takes place by a mechanism in which surface layers are plastically sheared relative to the subsurface material.In this paper the kinematical shakedown theorem is used to investigate this mode of deformation for rolling and sliding point contacts, in which a Hertz pressure and frictional traction act on an elliptical area which repeatedly traverses the surface of a half-space. Although a similar mechanism of incremental collapse is possible, the behaviour is found to be different from that in two-dimensional line contact in three significant ways: (i) To develop a mechanism for incremental growth the plastic shear zone must spread to the surface at the sides of the contact so that a complete segment of material immediately beneath the loaded area is free to displace relative to the remainder of the half-space, (ii) Residual shear stresses orthogonal to the surface are developed in the subsurface layers, (iii) A range of loads is found in which a closed cycle of alternating plasticity takes place without incremental growth, a condition often referred to as “plastic shakedown”.Optimal upper bounds to both the elastic and plastic shakedown limits have been found for varying coefficients of traction and shapes of the loaded ellipse. The analysis also gives estimates of the residual orthogonal shear stresses which are induced.     

Shakedown kinematic theorem for elastic–perfectly plastic bodies

The classical shakedown kinematic theorem due to Koiter for elastic–perfectly plastic bodies is re-examined and divided into separated shakedown and nonshakedown theorems. While the shakedown theorem is based on the set of Koiter's plastic strain rate cycles, the non-shakedown one involves a broader set of admissible plastic strain rate cycles, the end-cycle accumulated strains of which are deviatoric parts of compatible strain fields. For certain broad classes of practical problems the two statements are unified to yield the unique theorem in Koiter's sense.     

Plasticity with non-linear kinematic hardening: modelling and shakedown analysis by the bipotential approach

The class of generalised standard materials is not relevant to model the non-associative constitutive equations. The possible generalisation of Fenchel's inequality proposed by de Saxcé allows the recovery of flow rule normality for non-associative behaviours. The normality rule is written in the weak form of an implicit relation. This leads to the introduction of the class of implicit standard materials. This formulation is applied to constitutive equations involving non-linear kinematic hardening, indispensable to describe accurately and realistically the cyclic plasticity of metallic materials. For these plastic flow rules shakedown bound theorems can be extended; an analytical example of the shakedown of a thin-walled tube under constant traction and alternate cyclic torsion is considered and the obtained solution is proved to be exact.     

A kinematic elastic nonshakedown theorem for implicit standard materials

Summary  Criteria for a priori recognition of the type of steady-state response induced by cyclic loads and prediction whether a structure will shakedown elastically or not, without the necessity of performing a step-by-step full analysis, have considerable importance. Melan and Koiter theorems provide criteria that guarantee whether elastic shakedown occurs or not under cyclic loads in case of perfect plasticity. However, there remain some aspects of the shakedown theory which deserve further study. One of these, concerned with more realistic nonassociative elastic–plastic constitutive material models, allowing for nonlinear kinematic and isotropic hardening suitable to describe the cyclic plastic behaviour of metallic materials, has strong motivation. Koiter's elastic nonshakedown theorem is reconsidered here, with the objective of extending it to the de Saxcé's implicit standard material class, which contains a wide class of nonassociative elastic–plastic material behaviours. Shakedown analysis is formulated by a kinematic approach based on the plastic accumulation mechanism concept due to Polizzotto. A sufficient condition for elastic nonshakedown and a distinct necessary condition are established. Then, an upper bound to the shakedown multiplier is evaluated. Received 15 February 2001; accepted for publication 18 October 2001     

On shakedown of three-dimensional elastoplastic strain-hardening structures

The present article considers the shakedown problem of structures made of either kinematic or mixed strain-hardening materials. Some basic and useful shakedown properties of elastoplastic strain-hardening structures are proved mathematically. It is impossible for a kinematic strain-hardening structure to be involved in incremental plastic collapse, and so its only possible failure mode is that of alternating plasticity. A time-independent self-equilibrium stress field has no influence on the shakedown of a kinematic strain-hardening structure although it contributes to the magnitude of plastic deformation. The sufficient shakedown conditions for either kinematic or mixed strain-hardening structures are deduced, from which the lower bound of shakedown load domain can be obtained via a mathematical programming problem. It should be pointed out that, to guarantee the safety of an elastoplastic strain-hardening structure, the damage analysis is also necessary to determine the maximum load factor the structure can bear. The shakedown analysis of strain-hardening structures can be simplified by the conclusions obtained in this article, as is illustrated by two simple examples.     

Nonlocal gradient-dependent modeling of plasticity with anisotropic hardening

This work addresses the formulation of the thermodynamics of nonlocal plasticity using the gradient theory. The formulation is based on the nonlocality energy residual introduced by Eringen and Edelen (1972). Gradients are introduced for those variables associated with isotropic and kinematic hardening. The formulation applies to small strain gradient plasticity and makes use of the evanescent memory model for kinematic hardening. This is accomplished using the kinematic flux evolution as developed by Zbib and Aifantis (1988). Therefore, the present theory is a four nonlocal parameter-based theory that accounts for the influence of large variations in the plastic strain, accumulated plastic strain, accumulated plastic strain gradients, and the micromechanical evolution of the kinematic flux. Using the principle of virtual power and the laws of thermodynamics, thermodynamically-consistent equations are derived for the nonlocal plasticity yield criterion and associated flow rule. The presence of higher-order gradients in the plastic strain is shown to enhance a corresponding history variable which arises from the accumulation of the plastic strain gradients. Furthermore, anisotropy is introduced by plastic strain gradients in the form of kinematic hardening. Plastic strain gradients can be attributed to the net Burgers vector, while gradients in the accumulation of plastic strain are responsible for the introduction of isotropic hardening. The equilibrium between internal Cauchy stress and the microstresses conjugate to the higher-order gradients frames the yield criterion, which is obtained from the principle of virtual power. Microscopic boundary conditions, associated with plastic flow, are introduced to supplement the macroscopic boundary conditions of classical plasticity. The nonlocal formulation developed here preserves the classical assumption of local plasticity, wherein plastic flow direction is governed by the deviatoric Cauchy stress. The theory is applied to the problems of thin films on both soft and hard substrates. Numerical solutions are presented for bi-axial tension and simple shear loading of thin films on substrates.     

Endochronic description of plastic anisotropy in sheet metal

It is shown in this paper that an extended form of Hills quadratic yield criterion for anisotropic sheet metal can be derived from an endochronic theory of plasticity. The extended form considers the combined isotropic–kinematic hardening and the anomalous behavior observed in the anisotropic plastic behavior of sheet metals can be accounted for by the concept of kinematic hardening.This form of anisotropic endochronic theory can accommodate the usual requirement of normality between the plastic strain rate and the yield function. In addition, the theory leads naturally to the expressions for back stresses. This work provides an additional example to show that the form of the intrinsic time is directly related to the form of the yield function.It is suggested that the coefficients of the quadratic yield function be determined from the yield stresses obtained from a set of tension tests.     

Plastic yielding in cyclically loaded porous materials

The present paper focuses on plastic yielding of cyclically loaded porous materials. Unit cell models are employed to observe the evolution of the yield surface of porous materials under cyclic loading conditions. Non-linear isotropic as well as non-linear kinematic hardening matrix materials are considered. The yield surfaces computed with the unit cell models are compared to predictions of a micro-mechanical porous plasticity model that incorporates hardening. It is found that, in the case of kinematic hardening, the porous plasticity model underestimates the yield strength for larger hydrostatic stresses. An improvement of the model is proposed, so that a reasonable micro-mechanical approach to model porous materials under cyclic loadings is found.     

Shakedown theorems for some classes of nonassociative hardening elastic-plastic material models

Criteria for quasistatic (elastic) shakedown are established by a static approach and discussed in the light of illustrative examples. Reference is made to elastoplastic solids either with nonassociative plastic flow rules or nonlinear hardening (governed by internal variables), or both. Nonassociativity, that is, lack of normality, is known to occur in the superposed spaces of stresses and strains for the constitutive models of materials with internal friction (like most geomaterials); it is shown also to manifest in the augmented space (of both measurable and internal variables) for realistically modelling a hardening behaviour of metals subjected to cyclic stressing processes. Lower and upper bounds on the shakedown limit derived for these materials from sufficient and necessary shakedown criteria, respectively, are distinct due to the nonassociativity. They suggest recourse to the notion of the reduced yield domain different from the conventional yield domain defined in the augmented space of static variables.     

Structural shakedown for elastic–plastic materials with hardening saturation surface

An elastic–plastic material model with internal variables and thermodynamic potential, not admitting hardening states out of a saturation surface, is assumed as a basis to formulate a statical Melan-type shakedown theorem. Grounding on the optimality conditions relative to the shakedown load multiplier problem for a structure subjected to cyclic loads, the impending inadaptation collapse mechanism at the shakedown limit state is analyzed and discussed. It is shown that the adopted model is able to catch ratchetting collapse mode at a structural level. Numerical results for a simple structure are finally reported.     

A non-associated constitutive model with mixed iso-kinematic hardening for finite element simulation of sheet metal forming

In this paper an anisotropic material model based on non-associated flow rule and mixed isotropic–kinematic hardening was developed and implemented into a user-defined material (UMAT) subroutine for the commercial finite element code ABAQUS. Both yield function and plastic potential were defined in the form of Hill’s [Hill, R., 1948. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 193, 281–297] quadratic anisotropic function, where the coefficients for the yield function were determined from the yield stresses in different material orientations, and those of the plastic potential were determined from the r-values in different directions. Isotropic hardening follows a nonlinear behavior, generally in the power law form for most grades of steel and the exponential law form for aluminum alloys. Also, a kinematic hardening law was implemented to account for cyclic loading effects. The evolution of the backstress tensor was modeled based on the nonlinear kinematic hardening theory (Armstrong–Frederick formulation). Computational plasticity equations were then formulated by using a return-mapping algorithm to integrate the stress over each time increment. Either explicit or implicit time integration schemes can be used for this model. Finally, the implemented material model was utilized to simulate two sheet metal forming processes: the cup drawing of AA2090-T3, and the springback of the channel drawing of two sheet materials (DP600 and AA6022-T43). Experimental cyclic shear tests were carried out in order to determine the cyclic stress–strain behavior and the Bauschinger ratio. The in-plane anisotropy (r-value and yield stress directionalities) of these sheet materials was also compared with the results of numerical simulations using the non-associated model. These results showed that this non-associated, mixed hardening model significantly improves the prediction of earing in the cup drawing process and the prediction of springback in the sidewall of drawn channel sections, even when a simple quadratic constitutive model is used.