Barriers for uniformly elliptic equations and the exterior cone condition

We consider the mixed boundary value problem $\text{Au = f}\text{in}\text{Ω, B}{}_0\text{u = g}{}_0\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{, B}{}_1\text{u = g}{}_1\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where Ω is a bounded open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ whose boundary Γ is divided into disjoint open subsets Γ⁺ and Γ^? by an (n ? 2)-dimensional manifold ω in Γ. We assume A is a properly elliptic second order partial differential operator on $\text{Ω}$ and B_j, for j = 0, 1, is a normal jth order boundary operator satisfying the complementing condition with respect to A on $\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The coefficients of the operators and Γ⁺, Γ^? and ω are all assumed arbitrarily smooth. As announced in [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83 (1977), 391–393] we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of the coefficients of the operators for the mixed boundary value problem to be well posed in Sobolev spaces. In fact, we construct an open subset $\text{T}$ of the reals such that, if $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{= {u ? H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(Ω): Au = 0}}$ then for $\text{s ? =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{1), (B}{}_0\text{,B}{}_1\text{): D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{→ H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{) × H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{)}$ is a Fredholm operator if and only if s ∈$\text{T}$ . Moreover, $\text{T}$ = ?_xew$\text{T}$_x, where the sets $\text{T}$_x are determined algebraically by the coefficients of the operators at x. If n = 2, $\text{T}$_x is the set of all reals not congruent (modulo 1) to some exceptional value; if n = 3, $\text{T}$_x is either an open interval of length 1 or is empty; and finally, if n ? 4, $\text{T}$_x is an open interval of length 1.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Square roots of elliptic operators

Consider an elliptic sesquilinear form defined on $\text{V}$ × $\text{V}$ by $\text{J[u, v] = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{v}\text{?}\text{+ α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{u}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ au}\text{v}\text{?}\text{dx}$, where $\text{V}$ is a closed subspace of $\text{H}{}^1\text{(Ω)}$ which contains $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$, Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in $\text{R}$ⁿ, $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{, a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{, α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{, a ? L}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω),}\text{and Re}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? κ > 0}$ for all ζ?$\text{C}$ⁿ with ¦ζ¦ = 1. Let L be the operator with largest domain satisfying J[u, v] = (Lu, v) for all υ∈$\text{V}$. Then L + λI is a maximal accretive operator in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ for λ a sufficiently large real number. It is proved that $\text{(L + λI)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is a bounded operator from $\text{V}$ to $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ provided mild regularity of the coefficients is assumed. In addition it is shown that if the coefficients depend differentiably on a parameter t in an appropriate sense, then the corresponding square root operators also depend differentiably on t. The latter result is new even when the forms J are hermitian.     

Calcul fonctionnel sur les opérateurs admissibles et application

Let $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{(h) = ?(}\text{h}{}^2\text{2}\text{) · Δ + V,}\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{¦x¦\; \to \; +\infty }}\text{V(x) = + ∞}$. Under suitable conditions we prove that $\text{?(H}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{(h))}$ is a pseudodifferential operator whose symbol has an asymptotic: $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{(h) ~∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; ?\; 0}}\text{h}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{?,j}}$. More general pseudodifferential operator's classes are also considered. We apply this result to study the semi-classical behaviour of the spectrum of H_v as h → 0. So, we improve recent results obtained by J. Chazarain and by the author in collaboration with B. Helffer. Furthermore we give a precise meaning to the formal development considered in B. Grammaticos and A. Voros' work (Ann. Physics123 (1979), 359–380).     

Decomposition of representations induced from uniform subgroups and the “Mackey machine”

Let G be a separable locally compact group with a discrete cocompact subgroup Γ; let N be a normal subgroup of G, and suppose that Γ₀ = Γ ∩ N is cocompact in N. Let ? be a finite-dimensional representation of Γ, and let τ = Ind_{Γ → G ?}. We investigate the problem of determining the decomposition of τ, given the decomposition of the corresponding representation and certain other facts (essentially those used in the “Mackey machine”). The last section is devoted to a reciprocity theorem for τ.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Loeb-measurable solutions to 1finite games

Let ¹M be a denumerately comprehensive enlargement of a set-theoretic structure sufficient to model R. If F is an internal ¹finite subset of ¹N such that $\text{F = {1,…,γ}, γ?}{}^1\text{N?N}$, we define a class of ¹finite cooperative games having the form $\text{Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν) = 〈F,A(F),}{}^1\text{ν〉}$, where A(F) is the internal algebra of the internal subsets of F, and ${}^1\text{ν}$ is a set-function with $\text{Dom}{}^1\text{ν=A(F)}$, $\text{Rng}{}^1\text{ν =}{}^1\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{+}}$, and ${}^1\text{ν(Ø) = 0}$. If $\text{SI(}{}^1\text{ν)}$ is the space of S-imputations of a game Γ_F(¹ν) such that ${}^1\text{ν(F)<η}$, for some $\text{η?}{}^1\text{N}$, then we prove that $\text{SI(}{}^1\text{ν)}$ contains two nonempty subsets: $\text{QK(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$ and $\text{SM}{}_1\text{(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$, termed the quasi-kernel and S-bargaining set, respectively. Both $\text{QK(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$ and $\text{SM}{}_1\text{(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$ are external solution concepts for games of the form Γ_F (¹ν) and are defined in terms of predicates that are approximate in infinitesimal terms. Furthermore, if L(Θ) is the Loeb space generated by the ¹finitely additive measure space 〈F, A(F), U_F〉, and if a game Γ_F(¹ν) has a nonatomic representation $\text{ψ(}{}^1\text{ν}{}^{\mathrm{?0}}\text{)}$ on L(Θ) with respect to S-bounded transformations, then the standard part of any element in $\text{QK(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$ is Loeb-measurable and belongs to the quasi-kernel of $\text{ψ(}{}^1\text{ν}{}^{\mathrm{?0}}\text{)}$ defined in standard terms.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

Global existence for a delay differential equation

An elastic-plastic bar with simply connected cross section Q is clamped at the bottom and given a twist at the top. The stress function u, at a prescribed cross section, is then the solution of the variational inequality (0.1) $\text{min}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>v</mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>K</mtext>}}\text{{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{¦}\text{▽}\text{v¦}{}^2\text{? 2θ}{}_1\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{v} = ∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{¦}\text{▽}\text{u¦}{}^2\text{? 2θ}{}_1\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{u, u}\text{?}\text{K,}\text{where}\text{(0.2) K = {v}\text{?}\text{H}{}_0{}^1\text{(Q), ¦}\text{▽}\text{v¦ ? 1}\text{a.e.}\text{}}\text{and}\text{θ}{}_1$ is equal to the angle of the twist (after normalizing the units). Introducing the Lagrange multiplier λ_θ1, the unloading problem consists in solving the variational inequality (0.3) is the twisting angle for the unloaded bar; θ₂ < θ₁. Let (0.4) $\text{K}{}^1\text{= {v}\text{?}\text{H}{}_0{}^1\text{(Q), ?d(x) ? v(x) ? d(x)},}\text{where}\text{d(x) =}\text{dist}\text{.(x, ?Q)}$, and denote by $\text{u}{}^1\text{, w}{}^1$ the solutions of (0.1), (0.3), respectively, when K is replaced by $\text{K}{}^1$. The following results are well known for the loading problem (0.1):(0.5) $\text{u = u}{}^1$; (0.6) the plastic set $\text{P = (X}\text{?}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{; ¦}\text{▽}\text{u(x)¦ = 1}}$ is connected to the boundary. In this paper we show that, in general, (0.7) $\text{w ≠ w}{}^1$; (0.8) the plastic set $\text{P}\text{?}\text{= {x}\text{?}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{; ¦}\text{▽}\text{w(x)¦ = 1}}$ is not connected to the boundary. That is, we construct domains Q for which (0.7) and (0.8) hold for a suitable choice of θ₁, θ₂.     

Sharp nonlogarithmic Kneser theorems for fourth-order elliptic equations

Let D(?) be the Doob's class containing all functions f(z) analytic in the unit disk Δ such that f(0) = 0 and lim $\text{inf}\text{¦f(z) ¦ ? 1}$ on an arc A of ?Δ with length $\text{¦A ¦? ?}$. It is first proved that if f?D(?) then the spherical norm ∥ f ∥ = sup_z?Δ$\text{(}\text{1 ? ¦z¦}{}^2\text{)¦f′(z)¦}\text{(1 + ¦f(z)¦}{}^2\text{) ? C}{}_1\text{sin}\text{(π ? (}\text{?}\text{2}\text{))/ (π ? (}\text{g9}\text{2}\text{))}$, where C₁ = lim_n→∞$\text{∥ z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}\text{and}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< C}{}_1\text{<}\text{2}\text{e}$. Next, U represents the Seidel's class containing all non-constant functions f(z) bounded analytic in Δ such that $\text{¦tf(e}{}^{\mathrm{i0}}\text{)¦ = 1}$ almost everywhere. It is proved that inf_f?U∥f∥ = 0, and if f has either no singularities or only isolated singularities on ?Δ, then ∥f∥ ? C₁. Finally, it is proved that if f is a function normal in Δ, namely, the norm ∥f∥< ∞, then we have the sharp estimate ∥f^p∥ ? p∥f∥, for any positive integer p.     

Orthogonal polynomials on the negative multinomial distribution

Orthogonal polynomials on the multivariate negative binomial distribution,

$\text{(1 + Θ)}{}^{\mathrm{?\alpha ?x}}\text{(}\text{π}\text{j=0}\text{p}\text{Θ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^{\mathrm{x}}\text{j}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{!}\text{)}\text{Γ(α + x)}\text{Γ(α)}$

where α > 0, Θ₁ > 0, x = ΣΘ_i, x₀, x₁, …, x_p = 0,1, … are constructed and their properties studied.     

On exponential bases for the Sobolev spaces over an interval

We suppose that K is a countable index set and that $\text{Λ = {λ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{¦ k ? K}}$ is a sequence of distinct complex numbers such that forms a Riesz (strong) basis for L²[a, b], a < b. Let Σ = {σ₁, σ₂,…, σ_m} consist of m complex numbers not in Λ. Then, with p(λ) = Π_{k = 1}^m (λ ? σ_k), forms a Riesz (strong) bas Sobolev space H^m[a, b]. If we take σ₁, σ₂,…, σ_m to be complex numbers already in Λ, then, defining p(λ) as before, forms a Riesz (strong) basis for the space H^?m[a, b]. We also discuss the extension of these results to “generalized exponentials” tⁿe^λ_kt.     

Integral inequalities for generalized concave or convex functions

Let ψ be convex with respect to ?, B a convex body in Rⁿ and f a positive concave function on B. A well-known result by Berwald states that $\text{1}\text{¦B¦}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{ψ(f(x)) dx ? n ∝}{}_0{}^1\text{ψ(ξt)(1 ? t)}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1)}}\text{dt}$ (1) if ξ is chosen such that $\text{1}\text{¦B¦}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{?(f(x)) dx = n ∝}{}_0{}^1\text{?(ξt)(1 ? t)}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1)}}\text{dt}$.The main purpose in this paper is to characterize those functions f : B → R₊ such that (1) holds.     

Temporal exponential decay for the Stark effect in atoms

Let $\text{H}{}_1\text{= ?∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{(Δ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+ V(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)) + ∑}{}_{\mathrm{1\; ?\; i\; <j\; ?\; N}}\text{¦}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{, V(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) = N ∝ ¦}\text{x}\text{?}\text{y}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{?(}\text{y}\text{)d}\text{y}$, with ? a normalized Gaussian. Suppose $\text{E}$ ≠ 0 and that $\text{H = H}{}_1\text{+}\text{E}\text{· (∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ has no eigenfunctions in L²($\text{R}$^3N. If H₁ψ = μψ with μ < infσ_ess(H₁), then (ψ, e^?itHψ) decays exponentially at a rate governed by the positions of the resonances of H.     

A note on a theorem of heath

We propose a generalization of Heath's theorem that semi-metric spaces with point-countable bases are developable: A semi-metrizable space X is developabale if (and only if) there is on it a σ-discrete family $\text{C}\text{=?}{}_{\mathrm{m?N}}\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{m}}$ of closed sets, interior-preserving over each member C of which is a countable family {$\text{D}$_n(C): n ∈ N} of collections of open sets such that if U is a neighbourhood of ξ∈X, then there are such a Γ∈$\text{C}$ and such a v∈ N that ξ ? Γ and ξ∈ int ∩ (D: ξ: D∈$\text{D}$_v(Γ))?U.     

Positive operators on the n-dimensional ice cream cone

Let $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {x ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{: (x}{}_1{}^2\text{+ · +x}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{n?1}}\text{)}\text{1}\text{2}\text{? x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}$ be the n-dimensional ice cream cone, and let Γ(K_n) be the cone of all matrices in $\text{R}$ⁿⁿ mapping K_n into itself. We determine the structure of Γ(K_n), and in particular characterize the extreme matrices in Γ(K_n).     

A decomposition theorem for an analytic function

Let f(z), an analytic function with radius of convergence R (0 < R < ∞) be represented by the gap series ∑_{k = 0}^∞c_kz^λ_k. Set and define the growth constants ?, λ, T, t by

$\text{?}\text{λ}\text{=}\text{lim sup}\text{r→R}\text{inf}\text{{}\text{log}\text{[Rr /(R?r)]}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{M(r)}}$

, and if 0 < ? < ∞,

$\text{T}\text{t}\text{=}\text{lim sup}\text{r→R}\text{inf}\text{{[Rr /(R?r)]}{}^{\mathrm{??}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{M(r)}}$

. Then, assuming 0 < t < T < ∞, we obtain a decomposition theorem for f(z).     

Étude d'une équation de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés kählériennes compactes

On a compact Kähler manifold of complex dimension m ? 2, let us consider the change of Kähler metric $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{= g}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{+ ?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{φ}$. Let F?C^∞(V × R) be a function everywhere > 0 and v a real number ≠ 0. When $\text{0 < C}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? F(x, t) ? C(¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{+ 1)}$ for all (x, t) ?V × ] ?∞, t₀], where C and t₀ are constants and $\text{1 ? a <}\text{m}\text{(m ? 1)}$, one exhibits a function φ?C^∞ (V) such that $\text{¦g′∥g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= e}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\nu </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gf</mtext>}}\text{F(x, φ ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf) (¦g¦}\text{and}\text{¦g′¦}$ the determinants of the metrics g and $\text{g′,}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf = (}\text{mes}\text{V)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∝ φ dV)}$.