Cluster Compounds with Oxidised,Hexanuclear [Nb6Cli12Ia6]n− Anions (n=2 or 3)

Four mixed-halide cluster salts with chloride-iodide-supported octahedral Nb₆ metal atoms cores were prepared and investigated. The cluster anions have the formula [Nb₆Clⁱ₁₂I^a₆]ⁿ⁻ with Cl occupying the inner ligand sites and I the outer one. They are one- or two-electron-oxidized (n=2 or 3) with respect to the starting material cluster. (Ph₄P)⁺ and (PPN)⁺ function as counter cations. The X-ray structures reveal a mixed occupation of the outer sites for only one compound, (PPN)₃[Nb₆Clⁱ₁₂I^a_5.047(9)Cl^a_0.953]. All four compounds are obtained in high yield. If in the chemical reactions a mixture of acetic anhydride, CH₂Cl₂, and trimethylsilyl iodide is used, the resulting acidic conditions lead to form the two-electron-oxidised species (n=2) with 14 cluster-based electrons (CBEs). If only acetic anhydride is used, the 15 CBE species (n=3) is obtained in high yield. Interesting intermolecular bonding is found in (Ph₄P)₂[Nb₆Clⁱ₁₂I^a₆] ⋅ 4CH₂Cl₂ with I⋅⋅⋅I halogen bonding and π-π bonding interactions between the phenyl rings of the cations in (PPN)₃[Nb₆Clⁱ₁₂I^a_5.047(9)Cl^a_0.953]. The solubility of (Ph₄P)₂[Nb₆Clⁱ₁₂I^a₆] ⋅ 4CH₂Cl₂ has been determined qualitatively in a variety of solvents, and good solubility in the aprotic solvents CH₃CN, THF and CH₂Cl₂ has been found.     

Weak hydrogen and halogen bonding in 4‐[(2,2‐difluoroethoxy)methyl]pyridinium iodide and 4‐[(3‐chloro‐2,2,3,3‐tetrafluoropropoxy)methyl]pyridinium iodide

To enable a comparison between a C—H…X hydrogen bond and a halogen bond, the structures of two fluorous‐substituted pyridinium iodide salts have been determined. 4‐[(2,2‐Difluoroethoxy)methyl]pyridinium iodide, C₈H₁₀F₂NO⁺·I⁻, (1), has a –CH₂OCH₂CF₂H substituent at the para position of the pyridinium ring and 4‐[(3‐chloro‐2,2,3,3‐tetrafluoropropoxy)methyl]pyridinium iodide, C₉H₉ClF₄NO⁺·I⁻, (2), has a –CH₂OCH₂CF₂CF₂Cl substituent at the para position of the pyridinium ring. In salt (1), the iodide anion is involved in one N—H…I and three C—H…I hydrogen bonds, which, together with C—H…F hydrogen bonds, link the cations and anions into a three‐dimensional network. For salt (2), the iodide anion is involved in one N—H…I hydrogen bond, two C—H…I hydrogen bonds and one C—Cl…I halogen bond; additional C—H…F and C—F…F interactions link the cations and anions into a three‐dimensional arrangement.     

Zur reaktion von organophosphinen mit chalkogenen und ithalogenen: Rasche übertragung von tellur und jod zwischen phosphinen

Nucleophilic attack of tertiary phosphines at tellurium in R₃PTe and at iodine in R₃PI⁺ is indicated by rapid Te (or I⁺) transfer reactions in the systems R₃PTe PR₃ and R₃PI⁺/PR₃ (R = (CH₃)₃C, (CH₃)₂N). Linear intermediates of the type R₃PYPR3 (Y = Te, I⁺) are proposed.     

Isomorphous rare‐earth bis[bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)phosphate] complexes and their self‐assembly into two‐dimensional frameworks by intramolecular hydrogen bonds

The crystal structures of rare‐earth diaryl‐ or dialkylphosphate derivatives are poorly explored. Crystals of bis[bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)phosphato‐κO ]chloridotetrakis(methanol‐κO )neodymium methanol disolvate, [Nd(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)Cl(CH₄O)₄]·2CH₃OH, (1), and of the lutetium, [Lu(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)Cl(CH₄O)₄]·2CH₃OH, (2), and yttrium, [Y(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)Cl(CH₄O)₄]·2CH₃OH, (3), analogues have been obtained by reactions between lithium bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)phosphate and LnCl₃(H₂O)₆ (in a 2:1 ratio) in methanol. Compounds (1)–(3) crystallize in the C 2/c space group. Their crystal structures are isomorphous. The molecule possesses C ₂ symmetry with a twofold crystallographic axis passing through the Ln and Cl atoms. The bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)phosphate ligands all display a κ¹O‐monodentate coordination mode. The coordination polyhedron for the metal atom [coordination number (CN) = 7] is a distorted pentagonal bipyramid. Each [Ln{O₂P(O‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)₂}₂Cl(CH₃OH)₄] molecular unit exhibits two intramolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds, forming six‐membered rings, and two intramolecular O—H…Cl interactions, forming four‐membered rings. Intermolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds connect each unit via four noncoordinating methanol molecules with four other units, forming a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond network. Crystals of bis[bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)phosphato‐κO ]tetrakis(methanol‐κO )(nitrato‐κ²O ,O ′)neodymium methanol disolvate, [Nd(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)(NO₃)(CH₄O)₄]·2CH₃OH, (4), have been obtained in an analogous manner from NdCl₃(H₂O)₆. Compound (4) also crystalizes in the C 2/c space group. Its crystal structure is similar to those of (1)–(3). The κ²O ,O ′‐bidentate nitrate anion is disordered over a twofold axis, being located nearly on it. Half of the molecule is crystallographically unique (CN_Nd = 8). Unlike (1)–(3), complex (4) exhibits disorder of all three methanol molecules, one isopropyl group of the phosphate ligand and the NO₃⁻ ligand. The structure of (4) displays intra‐ and intermolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds similar to those in (1)–(3). Compounds (1)–(4) represent the first reported mononuclear bis[bis(diaryl/dialkyl)phosphate] rare‐earth complexes.     

Air‐Stable,Well‐Soluble AI2[Nb6Cl18] Cluster Compounds (AI = Organic Cation): A New Route for Preparation,Single‐Crystal Structures,Properties, and ESI‐Mass Spectra

Five niobium cluster compounds of the A^I₂[Nb₆Cl₁₈] type (A^I = organic cation: [nPr₄N]⁺, [nBu₄N]⁺, [BMIm]⁺, [Ph₄P]⁺, and [PPN]⁺) are obtained through treatment of [Nb₆Cl₁₄(H₂O)₄] · 4H₂O with excess of thionyl chloride in the presence of an organic chloride, A^ICl. Single‐crystal structure studies show that the compounds consist of discrete cations and cluster [Nb₆Cl₁₈]^2– anions. The cluster unit of the hydrated cluster starting material is oxidized by two electrons. Powder diffraction studies and NMR spectroscopic measurements show all compounds to crystallize without co‐crystallized solvent molecules. They are air and water stable. The solubility in organic solvents changes to a great extent on changing the type of cation. The ESI‐MS spectra of [nPr₄N]₂[Nb₆Cl₁₈] and [Ph₄P]₂[Nb₆Cl₁₈] show the pseudomolecular peak of the anionic cluster as well as additional signals, which involve simultaneously chloride mass loss and reduction processes.     

Comparison of non-covalent interactions and spectral properties in 1-methyl-3-methylthio-5-phenyl-1,2,4-triazinium mono- and tetraiodide crystals

The reaction of 1-methyl-3-methylthio-5-phenyl-1,2,4-triazinium (MTPT) iodide with diiodine in a solution leads to monoiodide crystal structure that in excess of iodine gives the unusual tetraiodide anion with two central iodine atoms in disorder. The bonding within the anion has been characterized as I^–…I₂…I^–; the existence of the bound iodine molecule inside has been proven by the characteristic band in experimental and calculated Raman spectra. Non-covalent interactions of MTPT in considered crystal structures are different. Monoiodide anion as a strong electron donor allows the formation of the S…I chalcogen bonds that are absent in tetraiodide structure. The features of halogen bonds within the I₄^2– anion are also performed.

     

Isomorphous rare‐earth tris[bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) phosphate] complexes and their catalytic properties in 1,3‐diene polymerization and in the inhibited oxidation of polydimethylsiloxane

Crystals of mononuclear tris[bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) phosphato‐κO]pentakis(methanol‐κO)lanthanide methanol monosolvates of lanthanum, [La(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)₃(CH₃OH)₅]·CH₃OH, ( 1 ), cerium, [Ce(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)₃(CH₃OH)₅]·CH₃OH, ( 2 ), and neodymium, [Nd(C₂₄H₃₄O₄P)₃(CH₃OH)₅]·CH₃OH, ( 3 ), have been obtained by reactions between LnCl₃(H₂O)_n (n = 6 or 7) and lithium bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) phosphate in a 1:3 molar ratio in methanol media. Compounds ( 1 )–( 3 ) crystallize in the monoclinic P2₁/c space group and have isomorphous crystal structures. All three bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) phosphate ligands display a κO‐monodentate coordination mode. The coordination number of the metal atom is 8. Each [Ln{O₂P(O‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)₂}₃(CH₃OH)₅] molecular unit exhibits four intramolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds, forming six‐membered rings. The unit forms two intermolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds with one noncoordinating methanol molecule. All six hydroxy H atoms are involved in hydrogen bonding within the [Ln{O₂P(O‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)₂}₃(CH₃OH)₅]·CH₃OH unit. This, along with the high steric hindrance induced by the three bulky diaryl phosphate ligands, prevents the formation of a hydrogen‐bond network. Complexes ( 1 )–( 3 ) exhibit disorder of two of the isopropyl groups of the phosphate ligands. The cerium compound ( 2 ) demonstrates an essential catalytic inhibition in the thermal decomposition of polydimethylsiloxane in air at 573 K. Catalytic systems based on the neodymium complex tris[bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) phosphato‐κO]neodymium, ( 3′ ), which was obtained as a dry powder of ( 3 ) upon removal of methanol, display a high catalytic activity in isoprene and butadiene polymerization.     

Oxidation of a P−C Bond under Mild Conditions

The reactivity of phosphenium dication [(Ph₃P)₂C‐P‐NiPr₂]²⁺, 1²⁺ , towards pyridine N‐oxide (O‐py) has been investigated. The resulting oxophosphonium dication [(Ph₃P)₂C(NiPr₂)P(O)(O‐py)]²⁺, 2²⁺ , was surprisingly stabilized by a less nucleophilic O‐py ligand instead of pyridine (py). This compound was then identified as an analogue of the elusive Criegee intermediate as it underwent oxygen insertion into the P?C bond through a mechanism usually observed for Baeyer–Villiger oxidations. This oxygen insertion appears to be the first example of a Baeyer–Villiger oxidation involving O‐py.     

Synthese,Struktur und Photochemie von Olefiniridium(I)‐Komplexen mit Acetylacetonatoliganden

Synthesis, Structure, and Photochemical Behavior of Olefine Iridium(I) Complexes with Acetylacetonato Ligands The bis(ethene) complex [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂H₄)₂] ( 1 ) reacts with tertiary phosphanes to give the monosubstitution products [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂H₄)(PR₃)] ( 2 – 5 ). While 2 (R = iPr) is inert toward PiPr₃, the reaction of 2 with diphenylacetylene affords the π‐alkyne complex [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂Ph₂)(PiPr₃)] ( 6 ). Treatment of [IrCl(C₂H₄)₄] with C‐functionalized acetylacetonates yields the compounds [Ir(κ²‐acacR^1,2)(C₂H₄)₂] ( 8 , 9 ), which react with PiPr₃ to give [Ir(κ²‐acacR^1,2)(C₂H₄)(PiPr₃)] ( 10 , 11 ) by displacement of one ethene ligand. UV irradiation of 5 (PR₃ = iPr₂PCH₂CO₂Me) and 11 (R² = (CH₂)₃CO₂Me) leads, after addition of PiPr₃, to the formation of the hydrido(vinyl)iridium(III) complexes 7 and 12 . The reaction of 2 with the ethene derivatives CH₂=CHR (R = CN, OC(O)Me, C(O)Me) affords the compounds [Ir(κ²‐acac)(CH₂=CHR)(PiPr₃)] ( 13 – 15 ), which on photolysis in the presence of PiPr₃ also undergo an intramolecular C–H activation. In contrast, the analogous complexes [Ir(κ²‐acac)(olefin)(PiPr₃)] (olefin = (E)‐C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂ 16 , (Z)‐C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂ 17 ) are photochemically inert.     

Synthese von verbrückend substituierten sekundären Phosphanen sowie deren Reaktionen mit Triisopropylindium

In this work we report the synthesis and characterisation of the 1.5‐diphosphanyldiethylether O{C₂H₄PH(SiiPr₃)}₂ ( 2 ) in which two silyl‐substituted phosphine groups are linked by an ether bridge as well as the compound O(SiiPr₂PHEt)₂ ( 3 ) where two ethyl substitute phosphine groups are connected by a siloxane bridge. In addition, we describe the metalation of 2 and 3 with triisopropylindium. These reactions lead to the compounds [O{C₂H₄P(SiiPr₃)IniPr₂}₂] ( 4 ) and [O{SiiPr₂P(Et)IniPr₂}₂] ( 5 ) with In₂P₂ ring structures.     

Supramolecular architectures in cytosinium 6‐chloronicotinate monohydrate and 5‐bromo‐6‐methylisocytosinium hydrogen sulfate

Aminopyrimidine derivatives are biologically important as they are components of nucleic acids and drugs. The crystals of two new salts, namely cytosinium 6‐chloronicotinate monohydrate, C₄H₆N₃O⁺·C₆H₃ClNO₂⁻·H₂O, ( I ), and 5‐bromo‐6‐methylisocytosinium hydrogen sulfate (or 2‐amino‐5‐bromo‐4‐oxo‐6‐methylpyrimidinium hydrogen sulfate), C₅H₇BrN₃O⁺·HSO₄⁻, ( II ), have been prepared and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The pyrimidine ring of both compounds is protonated at the imine N atom. In hydrated salt ( I ), the primary R₂²(8) ring motif (supramolecular heterosynthon) is formed via a pair of N—H…O(carboxylate) hydrogen bonds. The cations, anions and water molecule are hydrogen bonded through N—H…O, N—H…N, O—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen bonds, forming R₂²(8), R₃²(7) and R₅⁵(21) motifs, leading to a hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular sheet structure. The supramolecular double sheet structure is formed via water–carboxylate O—H…O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions between the anions and the cations. In salt ( II ), the hydrogen sulfate ions are linked via O—H…O hydrogen bonds to generate zigzag chains. The aminopyrimidinium cations are embedded between these zigzag chains. Each hydrogen sulfate ion bridges two cations via pairs of N—H…O hydrogen bonds and vice versa, generating two R₂²(8) ring motifs (supramolecular heterosynthon). The cations also interact with one another via halogen–halogen (Br…Br) and halogen–oxygen (Br…O) interactions.     

Rb6LiPr11Cl16[SeO3]12: Ein chloridisch derivatisiertes Rubidium‐Lithium‐Praseodym(III)‐Oxoselenat(IV)

Rb₆LiPr₁₁Cl₁₆[SeO₃]₁₂: A Chloride‐Derivatized Rubidium Lithium Praseodymium(III) Oxoselenate(IV) Transparent green square platelets with often truncated edges and corners of Rb₆LiPr₁₁Cl₁₆[SeO₃]₁₂ were obtained by the reaction of elemental praseodymium, praseodymium(III,IV) oxide and selenium dioxide with an eutectic LiCl–RbCl flux at 500 °C in evacuated silica ampoules. A single crystal of the moisture and air insensitive compound was characterized by X‐ray diffraction single‐crystal structure analysis. Rb₆LiPr₁₁Cl₁₆[SeO₃]₁₂ crystallizes tetragonally in the space group I4/mcm (no. 140; a = 1590.58(6) pm, c = 2478.97(9) pm, c/a = 1.559; Z = 4). The crystal structure is characterized by two types of layers parallel to the (001) plane following the sequence 121′2′1. Cl^? anions form cubes around the Rb⁺ cations (Rb1 and Rb2; CN = 8; d(Rb⁺?Cl^?) = 331 – 366 pm) within the first layer. One quarter of the possible places for Rb⁺ cations within this CsCl‐type kind of arrangement is not occupied, however the Cl^? anions of these vacancies are connected to Pr³⁺ cations (Pr4) above and below instead, forming square antiprisms of [(Pr4)O₄Cl₄]^9? units (d(Pr4?O) = 247–249 pm; d(Pr4?Cl) = 284–297 pm) that work as links between layer 1 and 2. Central cations of the second layer consist of Li⁺ and Pr³⁺. While the Li⁺ cations are surrounded by eight O^2? anions (d(Li?O5) = 251 pm) in the shape of cubes again, the Pr³⁺ cations are likewisely coordinated by eight O^2? anions as square antiprisms (for Pr1, d(Pr1?O2) = 242 pm) and by ten O^2? anions (for Pr2 and Pr3), respectively. The latter form tetracapped trigonal antiprisms (Pr2, d(Pr2?O) = 251–253 pm and 4 × 262 pm) or bicapped distorted cubes (Pr3, d(Pr3?O) = 245–259 pm and 2 × 279 pm). The non‐binding electron pairs (“lone pairs”) at the two crystallographically different Ψ¹‐tetrahedral [SeO₃]^2? anions (d(Se⁴⁺?O^2?) = 169–173 pm) are directing towards the empty cavities between the layer‐connecting [(Pr4)O₄Cl₄]^9? units.     

Chiral Phosphine Ligands from Amino Acids. II. A Facile Synthesis of Phosphinoserines by Nucleophilic Phosphination Reactions – X‐Ray Structure Analyses of Ar2P–CH2–CH(NHBOC)(COOMe) (Ar = Ph,m‐xylyl)

Phosphino derivatives of serine R₂P–CH₂–CH(NHBOC)(COOMe) ( 2 a – 2 d ) have been obtained in high yield by nucleophilic phosphination of N‐(tert.butoxycarbonyl)‐3‐iodo‐L‐alanine methylester with secondary phosphines R₂PH (R = Ph, 2‐tolyl, 3,5‐xylyl, cyclohexyl) in DMF using potassium carbonate as the base. Deprotection of 2 b with HCl affords the amino acid ester hydrochloride [2‐Tol₂P–CH₂–CH(NH₃)(COOMe)]⁺Cl^– ( 3 a ). The X‐ray structures of 2 a (space group P2₁/n) and 2 c (space group P 1) have been determined. The two enantiomers of 2 a or 2 c are interconnected by N–H…O hydrogen bridges forming dimers in the solid state.     

Mononuclear Carbene Dithiolate [Ni(NHX)(′S2C ′)] Complexes with HNX = HNPiPr3 or HNSPh2 Coligands (′S2C ′ 2– = 1,3‐ImidazolidinylN,N′‐bis(2‐benzenethiolate)(2–))

Cleavage reactions of the dinuclear [{Ni(′S₂C ′)}₂] · DMF (′S₂C ′ ^2– = 1,3‐imidazolidinyl‐N,N′‐bis(2‐benzenethiolate)(2–)) with HNPiPr₃ or HNSPh₂ yielded the mononuclear complexes [Ni(NHPiPr₃)(′S₂C ′)] ( 1 ) and [Ni(NHSPh₂)(′S₂C ′)] ( 2 ) which have been completely characterized. The nickel‐carbene‐dithiolate [Ni(′S₂C ′)] moiety is one of the very rare complex fragments that are able to coordinate both HNPR₃ or HNSR₂. IR spectra and X‐ray structure determinations show that 1 and 2 exhibit intramolecular N–H…S(thiolate) hydrogen bonds. Geometric parameters and NMR spectroscopic data of 1 and 2 are compatible with N–X single bonds and ylidic structures of the HNPiPr₃ and HNSPh₂ ligands. Comparison of Ni–N distances in diamagnetic and paramagnetic [Ni(NHSPh₂)] complexes was rendered possible through the X‐ray structure determination of the homoleptic [Ni(NHSPh₂)₆]Cl₂ ( 3 ) which formed as minor by‐product in the synthesis of 2 .     

Ein‐ und zweikernige Rhodiumkomplexe mit Arsino(phosphino)methanen in unterschiedlichen Koordinationsformen

Mono‐ and Dinuclear Rhodium Complexes with Arsino(phosphino)methanes in Different Coordination Modes The cyclooctadiene complex [Rh(η⁴‐C₈H₁₂)(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)](PF₆) ( 1a ) reacts with CO and CNtBu to give the substitution products [Rh(L)₂(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)](PF₆) ( 2 , 3 ). From 1a and Na(acac) in the presence of CO the neutral compound [Rh(κ²‐acac)(CO)(κ‐P‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 4 ) is formed. The reactions of 1a , the corresponding B(Ar_F)₄‐salt 1b and [Rh(η⁴‐C₈H₁₂)(κ²‐iPr₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)](PF₆) ( 5 ) with acetonitrile under a H₂ atmosphere affords the complexes [Rh(CH₃CN)₂(κ²‐R₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)]X ( 6a , 6b , 7 ), of which 6a (R = tBu; X = PF₆) gives upon treatment with Na(acac‐f₆) the bis(chelate) compound [Rh(κ²‐acac‐f₆)(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 8 ). From 8 and CH₃I a mixture of two stereoisomers of composition [Rh(CH₃)I(κ²‐acac‐f₆)(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 9/10 ) is generated by oxidative addition, and the molecular structure of the racemate 9 has been determined. The reactions of 1a and 5 with CO in the presence of NaCl leads to the formation of the “A‐frame” complexes [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ‐Cl)(μ‐R₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)₂](PF₆) ( 11 , 12 ), which have been characterized crystallographically. From 11 and 12 the dinuclear substitution products [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ‐X)(μ‐R₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)₂](PF₆) ( 13 ‐ 16 ) are obtained by replacing the bridging chloride for bromide, hydride or hydroxide, respectively. While 12 (R = iPr) reacts with NaI to give the related “A‐frame” complex 18 , treatment of 11 (R = tBu) with NaI yields the mononuclear chelate compound [RhI(CO)(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 20 ). The reaction of 20 with CH₃I affords the acetyl complex [RhI₂{C(O)CH₃}(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 21 ) with five‐coordinate rhodium atom.     

Kristallzüchtung und Strukturbestimmung eines metallorganischen Donator/Akzeptor‐Komplexes von I2C=CI2

Crystallization and Structure Determination of an I₂C=CI₂ organometallic Donor/Acceptor Complex The rectangular D_2h molecule I₂C=CI₂ contains 95.5% iodine with the rather bulky I substituents hiding the CC‐π‐system and heavily penetrating each other [1]. Starting both from the structure determination of a sublimed novel P2₁/n polymorph and extensive DFT calculations, numerous hitherto unknown donor/acceptor complexes of I₂C=CI₂ have been crystallized and structurally characterized [2]. Here we report the first adduct of tetraiodoethylene to a metalorganic complex, {[Pb²⁺(18‐crown‐6)(I^–)₂]…I₂C=CI₂}, crystallized from lead(18‐crown‐6)diiodide and I₂C=CI₂ in chloroform. The structure consists of polymer chains with angles ∢IPbI of 159° and distances I^–…I₂C=CI₂ between 348 to 359 pm. Both the 18‐crown‐6 ligand and the chloroform solvent molecule included in the crystal are considerably disordered. Space group Pnma (IT Nr. 62), Z = 4, lattice dimensions at 150 K, a = 1724.2(2), b = 1416.4(2), c = 1330.8(2), V = 3250.0(8) · 10⁶ pm³, R = 0.0428.     

Unexpected Coordination Modes of the Tris(imidazolyl)phosphane Oxide Ligand 4‐TIPOiPr in the Chloro Complexes of Zinc,Cobalt and Nickel

The coordination chemistry of the water soluble phosphane oxide ligand tris[2‐isopropylimidazol‐4(5)‐yl]phosphane oxide, 4‐TIPO^iPr, has been explored. A variety of 3d‐metal halide complexes have been prepared and the crystal structures of the solvates [(4‐TIPO^iPr)ZnCl₂]·MeOH·¹/₂dioxane ( 1 ·MeOH·¹/₂dioxane), [(4‐TIPO^iPr)CoCl₂]·H₂O·2dioxane ( 2 ·H₂O·2dioxane) and [(4‐TIPO^iPr)₂Ni(MeOH)₂]Cl₂·2MeOH ( 3 ·2MeOH) have been determined. All three structures show unprecedented coordination modes of the 4‐TIPO^iPr ligand. Both zinc and cobalt complexes are coordinated in a bidentate κ²N fashion, whereas the nickel atom is coordinated by two ligands in a κN,O mode using one imidazolyl substituent and the P=O oxygen atom.     

Supramolecular structures of rhenium(I) complexes mediated by ligand planarity via the interplay of substituents

The crystal and molecular structures of two Re^I tricarbonyl complexes, namely fac‐tricarbonylchlorido[1‐(4‐fluorocinnamoyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)pyrazole‐κN²]rhenium(I), [ReCl(C₁₇H₁₂FN₃O)(CO)₃], (I), and fac‐tricarbonylchlorido[1‐(4‐nitrocinnamoyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)pyrazole‐κN²]rhenium(I) acetone monosolvate, [ReCl(C₁₇H₁₂ClN₄O₃)(CO)₃]·C₃H₆O, (II), are reported. The complexes form centrosymmetric dimers that are linked into one‐dimensional columns by C—H…Cl and N—O…H interactions in (I) and (II), respectively. C—H…Cl interactions in (II) generate two R₂¹(7) loops that merge into a single R₂¹(10) loop. These interactions involve the alkene, pyrazole and benzene rings, hence restricting the ligand rotation and giving rise to a planar conformation. Unlike (II), complex (I) exhibits a twisted conformation of the ligand and a pair of molecules forms a centrosymmetric dimer with an R₂²(10) loop via C—H…O interactions. The unique supramolecular structures of (I) and (II) are determined by their planarity and weak interactions. The planar conformation of (II) provides a base for appreciable π–π stacking interactions compared to (I). In addition, an N—O…π interaction stabilizes the supramolecular structure of (II). We report herein the first n→π* interactions of Re^I tricarbonyl complexes, which account for 0.33 kJ mol⁻¹. Intermolecular C—H…Cl and C—H…O interactions are present in both complexes, with (II) showing a greater preference for these interactions compared to (I), with cumulative contributions of 48.7 and 41.5%, respectively. The influence of inductive (fluoro) and/or resonance (nitro) effects on the π‐stacking ability was further supported by LOLIPOP (localized orbital locator‐integrated π over plane) analysis. The benzene ring of (II) demonstrated a higher π‐stacking ability compared to that of (I), which is supported by the intrinsic planar geometry. The HOMA (harmonic oscillator model of aromaticity) index of (I) revealed more aromaticity with respect to (II), suggesting that NO₂ greatly perturbed the aromaticity. The Hirshfeld fingerprint (FP) plots revealed the preference of (II) over (I) for π–π contacts, with contributions of 6.8 and 4.4%, respectively.     

Different supramolecular architectures mediated by different weak interactions in the crystals of three N‐aryl‐2,5‐dimethoxybenzenesulfonamides

The synthesis and evaluation of the pharmacological activities of molecules containing the sulfonamide moiety have attracted interest as these compounds are important pharmacophores. The crystal structures of three closely related N‐aryl‐2,5‐dimethoxybenzenesulfonamides, namely N‐(2,3‐dichlorophenyl)‐2,5‐dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C₁₄H₁₃Cl₂NO₄S, (I), N‐(2,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐2,5‐dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C₁₄H₁₃Cl₂NO₄S, (II), and N‐(2,4‐dimethylphenyl)‐2,5‐dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C₁₆H₁₉NO₄S, (III), are described. The asymmetric unit of (I) consists of two symmetry‐independent molecules, while those of (II) and (III) contain one molecule each. The molecular conformations are stabilized by different intramolecular interactions, viz. C—H…O interactions in (I), N—H…Cl and C—H…O interactions in (II), and C—H…O interactions in (III). The crystals of the three compounds display different supramolecular architectures built by various weak intermolecular interactions of the types C—H…O, C—H…Cl, C—H…π(aryl), π(aryl)–π(aryl) and Cl…Cl. A detailed Hirshfeld surface analysis of these compounds has also been conducted in order to understand the relationship between the crystal structures. The d _norm and shape‐index surfaces of (I)–(III) support the presence of various intermolecular interactions in the three structures. Analysis of the fingerprint plots reveals that the greatest contribution to the Hirshfeld surfaces is from H…H contacts, followed by H…O/O…H contacts. In addition, comparisons are made with the structures of some related compounds. Putative N—H…O hydrogen bonds are observed in 29 of the 30 reported structures, wherein the N—H…O hydrogen bonds form either C (4) chain motifs or R ₂²(8) rings. Further comparison reveals that the characteristics of the N—H…O hydrogen‐bond motifs, the presence of other interactions and the resultant supramolecular architecture is largely decided by the position of the substituents on the benzenesulfonyl ring, with the nature and position of the substituents on the aniline ring exerting little effect. On the other hand, the crystal structures of (I)–(III) display several weak interactions other than the common N—H…O hydrogen bonds, resulting in supramolecular architectures varying from one‐ to three‐dimensional depending on the nature and position of the substituents on the aniline ring.     

Building up 1‐D, 2‐D,and 3‐D Polyiodide Frameworks by Finely Tuning the Size of Aryls on Ar‐S‐TTF in the Charge‐Transfer (CT) Complexes of Ar‐S‐TTFs and Iodine

The arylthio‐substituted tetrathiafulvalenes (Ar‐S‐TTFs) are electron donors having three reversible states, neutral, cation radical, and dication. The charge‐transfer (CT) between Ar‐S‐TTFs ( TTF1 — TTF3 ) and iodine (I₂) is reported herein. TTF1 — TTF3 show the CT with I₂ in the CH₂Cl₂ solution, but they are not completely converted into cation radical state. In CT complexes of TTF1 — TTF3 with I₂, the charged states of Ar‐S‐TTFs are distinct from those in solution. TTF1 is at cation radical state, and TTF2 — TTF3 are oxidized to dication. The iodine components in complexes show various structures including 1‐D chain of V‐shaped (I₅)^–, and 2‐D and 3‐D iodine networks composed of I₂ and (I₃)^–.