Concomitant polymorphic forms of 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole

The dipharmacophore compound 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole, C₁₀H₁₁N₅O, was studied on the assumption of its potential biological activity. Two concomitant polymorphs were obtained on crystallization from isopropanol solution and these were thoroughly studied. Identical conformations of the molecules are found in both structures despite the low difference in energy between the four possible conformers. The two polymorphs differ crucially with respect to their crystal structures. A centrosymmetric dimer formed due to both stacking interactions of the `head‐to‐tail' type and N—H…N(π) hydrogen bonds is the building unit in the triclinic structure. The dimeric building units form an isotropic packing. In the orthorhombic polymorphic structure, the molecules form stacking interactions of the `head‐to‐head' type, which results in their organization in a column as the primary basic structural motif. The formation of N—H…N(lone pair) hydrogen bonds between two neighbouring columns allows the formation of a double column as the main structural motif. The correct packing motifs in the two polymorphs could not be identified without calculations of the pairwise interaction energies. The triclinic structure has a higher density and a lower (by 0.60 kcal mol^?1) lattice energy according to periodic calculations compared to the orthorhombic structure. This allows us to presume that the triclinic form of 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole is the more stable.     

Polymorphism of methyl 4‐amino‐3‐phenylisothiazole‐5‐carboxylate: an experimental and theoretical study

Being a close analogue of amflutizole, methyl 4‐amino‐3‐phenylisothiazole‐5‐carboxylate (C₁₁H₁₀N₂O₂S) was assumed to be capable of forming polymorphic structures. Noncentrosymmetric and centrosymmetric polymorphs have been obtained by crystallization from a series of more volatile solvents and from denser tetrachloromethane, respectively. Identical conformations of the molecule are found in both structures. The two polymorphs differ mainly in the intermolecular interactions formed by the amino group and in the type of stacking interactions between the π‐systems. The most effective method for revealing packing motifs in structures with intermolecular interactions of different types (hydrogen bonding, stacking, dispersion, etc.) is to study the pairwise interaction energies using quantum chemical calculations. Molecules form a column as the primary basic structural motif due to stacking interactions in both polymorphic structures under study. The character of a column (straight or zigzag) is determined by the orientations of the stacked molecules (in a `head‐to‐head' or `head‐to‐tail' manner). Columns bound by intermolecular N—H…O and N—H…N hydrogen bonds form a double column as the main structural motif in the noncentrosymmetric structure. Double columns in the noncentrosymmetric structure and columns in the centrosymmetric structure interact strongly within the ab crystallographic plane, forming a layer as a secondary basic structural motif. The noncentrosymmetric structure has a lower density and a lower (by 0.59 kJ mol^?1) lattice energy, calculated using periodic calculations, compared to the centrosymmetric structure.     

Three polymorphs of 3‐(3‐phenyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐yl)‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐2‐one formed from different solvents

The polymorphic study of 3‐(3‐phenyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐yl)‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐2‐one, C₁₇H₁₁N₃O₂, was performed due to its potential biological activity and revealed three polymorphic modifications in the triclinic space group P, the monoclinic space group P2₁ and the orthorhombic space group Pbca. These polymorphs have a one‐column layered type of crystal organization. The strongest interactions between the molecules of the studied structures is stacking between π‐systems, while N—H…N and C—H…O hydrogen bonds link stacked columns forming layers as a secondary basic structural motif. C—H…π hydrogen bonds were observed between neighbouring layers and their role is the least significant in the formation of the crystal structure. Packing differences between the polymorphic modifications are minor and can be identified only using an analysis based on a comparison of the pairwise interaction energies.     

Polymorphism of 3‐(5‐phenyl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl)‐ and 3‐[5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]‐2H‐chromen‐2‐ones

This study of 3‐(5‐phenyl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl)‐2H‐chromen‐2‐one, C₁₇H₁₀N₂O₃, 1 , and 3‐[5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]‐2H‐chromen‐2‐one, C₁₆H₉N₃O₃, 2 , was performed on the assumption of the potential anticancer activity of the compounds. Three polymorphic structures for 1 and two polymorphic structures for 2 have been studied thoroughly. The strongest intermolecular interaction is stacking of the `head‐to‐head' type in all the studied crystals. The polymorphic structures of 1 differ with respect to the intermolecular interactions between stacked columns. Two of the polymorphs have a columnar or double columnar type of crystal organization, while the third polymorphic structure can be classified as columnar‐layered. The difference between the two structures of 2 is less pronounced. Both crystals can be considered as having very similar arrangements of neighbouring columns. The formation of polymorphic modifications is caused by a subtle balance of very weak intermolecular interactions and packing differences can be identified only using an analysis based on a study of the pairwise interaction energies.     

Hydrogen bonding structure and many‐body interactions in 1,3,5‐triazine–(water)3 and 1,2,4‐triazine–(water)3 complexes

The hydrogen bonding structure and many‐body interactions between 1,3,5‐triazine (1,2,4‐triazine) and three water molecules are studied using the density functional theory (DFT) B3LYP method and 6‐31++G** basis set. Various structures of 1,3,5‐triazine–(water)₃ and 1,2,4‐triazine–(water)₃ complexes are investigated, and the seven and eight stable structures are reported for 1,3,5‐triazine–(water)₃ and 1,2,4‐triazine–(water)₃, respectively. Many‐body analysis is also carried out to obtain relaxation energy and many‐body interaction energy (two‐, three‐, and four‐body), and the most stable conformer has the basis set superposition error corrected interaction energy of ?92.09 and ?99.53 kJ/mol. The two‐ and three‐body interactions have significant contribution to the total interaction energy, whereas the relaxation energy, four‐body interactions are very small for 1,3,5‐triazine–(water)₃ and 1,2,4‐triazine–(water)₃ complexes. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2007     

Two pseudo‐enantiomeric forms of N‐benzyl‐4‐hydroxy‐1‐methyl‐2,2‐dioxo‐1H‐2λ6,1‐benzothiazine‐3‐carboxamide and their analgesic properties

The fact that molecular crystals exist as different polymorphic modifications and the identification of as many polymorphs as possible are important considerations for the pharmaceutic industry. The molecule of N‐benzyl‐4‐hydroxy‐1‐methyl‐2,2‐dioxo‐1H‐2λ⁶,1‐benzothiazine‐3‐carboxamide, C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₄S, does not contain a stereogenic atom, but intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions engender enantiomeric chiral conformations as a labile racemic mixture. The title compound crystallized in a solvent‐dependent single chiral conformation within one of two conformationally polymorphic P2₁2₁2₁ orthorhombic chiral crystals (denoted forms A and B). Each of these pseudo‐enantiomorphic crystals contains one of two pseudo‐enantiomeric diastereomers. Form A was obtained from methylene chloride and form B can be crystallized from N,N‐dimethylformamide, ethanol, ethyl acetate or xylene. Pharmacological studies with solid–particulate suspensions have shown that crystalline form A exhibits an almost fourfold higher antinociceptive activity compared to form B.     

Polymorphism and phase transition behavior of 6,6′‐bis(chloromethyl)‐1,1′,4,4′‐tetramethyl‐3,3′‐(p‐phenylenedimethylene)bis(piperazine‐2,5‐dione)

A crystallographic investigation of the title compound, C₂₂H₂₈Cl₂N₄O₄, using crystals obtained under different crystallization conditions, revealed the presence of two distinct polymorphic forms. The molecular conformation in the two polymorphs is very different: one adopts a `C' shape, whereas the other adopts an `S' shape. In the latter, the molecule lies across a crystallographic twofold axis. The `S'‐shaped polymorph undergoes a reversible orthorhombic‐to‐monoclinic phase transition on cooling, whereas the structure of the `C'‐shaped polymorph is temperature insensitive.     

Two polymorphs of 1,8‐dichloroanthracene

A second, monoclinic, polymorph of the title compound, C₁₄H₈Cl₂, has been found. In addition to the structure of this monoclinic form, the structure of the previously described orthorhombic form [Desvergne, Chekpo & Bouas‐Laurent (1978). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 84–87; Benites, Maverick & Fronczek (1996). Acta Cryst. C 52 , 647–648] has been redetermined at low temperature and using modern methods. The low‐temperature structure of the orthorhombic form is of significantly higher quality than the previously published structure and additional details can be derived. A comparison of the crystal packing of the two forms with a focus on weak intermolecular C—H...Cl interactions shows the monoclinic structure to have one such interaction linking the molecules into infinite ribbons, while two crystallographically independent C—H...Cl interactions give rise to an interesting infinite three‐dimensional network in the orthorhombic crystal form.     

Two polymorphs of N‐(2,6‐difluorophenyl)formamide

The structures of two distinct polymorphic forms of N‐(2,6‐difluorophenyl)formamide, C₇H₅F₂NO, have been studied using single crystals obtained under different crystallizing conditions. The two forms crystallize in different space groups, viz. form (Ia) in the orthorhombic Pbca and form (Ib) in the monoclinic P2₁ space group. Each polymorph crystallizes with one complete molecule in the asymmetric unit and they have a similar molecular geometry, showing a trans conformation with the formamide group being out of the plane of the aromatic ring. The packing arrangements of the two polymorphs are quite different, with form (Ia) having molecules that are stacked in an alternating arrangement, linked into chains of N—H...O hydrogen bonds along the crystallographic a direction, while form (Ib) has its N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded molecules stacked in a linear fashion. A theoretical study of the two structures allows information to be gained regarding other contributing interactions, such as π–π and weak C—H...F, in their crystal structures.     

Monoclinic and orthorhombic polymorphs of 4,4′,6,6′‐tetrachloro‐2,2′‐(piperazine‐1,4‐diyldimethylene)diphenol

The title compound, C₁₈H₁₈Cl₄N₂O₂, crystallizes as monoclinic and orthorhombic polymorphs from CHCl₃–CH₃OH solution. In both polymorphic forms, the molecule lies on a crystallographic centre of inversion (at the piperazine ring centroid) and exhibits an intramolecular O—H...N hydrogen bond. In the monoclinic polymorph (space group P2₁/c), the molecules are linked by intermolecular C—H...Cl hydrogen bonds into a ribbon sheet built from R₈⁸(34) rings. In the orthorhombic polymorph (space group Pbcn), the molecules are linked by intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds into a ribbon sheet of R₆⁶(34) rings. The sheets in the orthorhombic polymorph are crosslinked into a three‐dimensional framework by π–π stacking interactions.     

9‐Cyano‐10‐methylacridinium hydrogen dinitrate

The title compound, C₁₅H₁₁N₂⁺·HN₂O₆^?, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with four mol­ecules in the unit cell. The planar 9‐cyano‐10‐methyl­acridinium cations lie on crystallographic twofold axes and are arranged in layers, almost perpendicular to the ac plane, in such a way that neighbouring mol­ecules are positioned in a `head‐to‐tail' manner. These cations and the hydrogen dinitrate anions are linked through C—H?O interactions involving four of the six O atoms of the anion and the H atoms attached to the C atoms of the acridine moiety in ring positions 2 and 4. The H atom of the hydrogen dinitrate anion appears to be located on the centre of inversion relating two of the four O atoms engaged in the above‐mentioned C—H?O interactions. In this way, columns of either anions or cations running along the c axis are held in place by the network of C—H?O interactions, forming a relatively compact crystal lattice.     

Two new polymorphs of 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4(3H)‐one monohydrate

The title compound, C₄H₆N₄O·H₂O, crystallized simultaneously as a triclinic and a monoclinic polymorph from an aqueous solution of 2,4‐diaminopyrimidin‐6‐ol. Previously, an orthorhombic polymorph was isolated under the same experimental conditions. The molecular geometric parameters in the two present polymorphs and the previously reported orthorhombic polymorph are similar, but the structures differ in the details of their crystal packing. In the triclinic system, the diaminopyrimidinone molecules are connected to one another via N—H...O and N—H...N hydrogen bonding to form infinite chains in the [011] direction. The chains are further hydrogen bonded to the water molecules, resulting in a three‐dimensional network. In the monoclinic system, the diaminopyrimidinone molecules are hydrogen bonded together into two‐dimensional networks parallel to the bc plane. The water molecules link the planes to form a three‐dimensional polymeric structure.     

A third polymorph of 4‐(2,6‐difluorophenyl)‐1,2,3,5‐dithiadiazolyl

The crystal structure of a third polymorphic form of the known 4‐(2,6‐difluorophenyl)‐1,2,3,5‐dithiadiazolyl radical, C₇H₃F₂N₂S₂, is reported. This new polymorph represents a unique crystal‐packing motif never before observed for 1,2,3,5‐dithiadiazolyl (DTDA) radicals. In the two known polymorphic forms of the title compound, all of the molecules form cis‐cofacial dimers, such that two molecules are π‐stacked with like atoms one on top of the other, a common arrangement for DTDA species. By contrast, the third polymorph, reported herein, contains two crystallographically unique molecules organized such that only 50% are dimerized, while the other 50% remain monomeric radicals. The dimerized molecules are arranged in the trans‐antarafacial mode. This less common dimer motif for DTDA species is characterized by π–π interactions between the S atoms [S...S = 3.208 (1) Å at 110 K], such that the two molecules of the dimer are related by a centre of inversion. The most remarkable aspect of this third polymorph is that the DTDA dimers are co‐packed with monomers. The monomeric radicals are arranged in one‐dimensional chains directed by close lateral intermolecular contacts between the two S atoms of one DTDA heterocycle and an N atom of a neighbouring coplanar DTDA heterocycle [S...N = 2.857 (2) and 3.147 (2) Å at 110 K].     

N‐Cyclo­hexyl‐2‐[5‐(4‐pyridyl)‐4‐(p‐tolyl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl­sulfanyl]­acetamide dihydrate

In the title compound, C₂₂H₂₅N₅OS·2H₂O, the mol­ecules are stacked in columns running along the b axis. In this arrangemant, the mol­ecules are linked to each other by a combination of one two‐centre N—H⋯O hydrogen bond and four two‐centre O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds containing two types of ring motif, viz.R₄⁴(10) and R₃³(11). In the crystal structure, centrosymmetric π–π inter­actions between the triazole rings, with a distance of 3.691 (2) Å between the ring centroids, also affect the packing of the mol­ecules.     

[1,3‐Bis(2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluorobenzyl)benzimidazol‐2‐ylidene]bromido(η4‐cycloocta‐1,5‐diene)rhodium(I)

The title complex, [RhBr(C₈H₁₂)(C₂₁H₈N₂F₁₀)], has a slightly distorted pseudo‐square‐planar geometry. The whole molecule has an approximate mirror symmetry, with the mirror plane passing through the mid‐points of the two alkene bonds of the cycloocta‐1,5‐diene (COD) ligand. The average Rh—C(COD) distance is inversely related to the magnitude of the Rh—C(benzimidazole) distance in this type of compound. The molecules are stacked in columns running along the a axis. The crystal structure contains two types of intermolecular C—H...F interactions, as well as two weak π–π stacking interactions.     

Syntheses,Molecular Structure and Thermodynamic Properties of 3‐Nitro‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐one Europium Complex [Eu(NTO)3(H2O)5]·5H2O

3‐Nitro‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐one (NTO) europium complex of [Eu(NTO)₃(H₂O)₅]·5H₂O was synthesized by mixing the aqueous solution of lithium 3‐nitro‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐onate and the dilute nitric acid solution of europium oxide. The title complex was characterized by elemental analysis and IR spectra. The single crystal structure was determined by a four‐circle x‐ray diffractometer. The title complex is monoclinic with space group P2₁/n and unit cell parameters of a = 1.8720(2) nm, b = 0.6548(3) nm, c = 1.9323(3) nm and β = 95.33(1)°. The coordination geometry around the europium ion is a distorted dodecahedron and there are five crystalline water molecules to form the stable structure of the crystal. From measurements of the enthalpy of solution in water at 298.15 K, the standard enthalpy of formation, lattice enthalpy and lattice energy have been determined as ‐(3798.6 ± 3.7), ?4488.4 and ?4452.4 kJ·mol^?;1, respectively.     

3‐Amino‐1,2,4‐triazine

In the crystal structure of 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazine, C₃H₄N₄, the mol­ecules form hydrogen‐bonded chains that are almost parallel to the b axis (3.2°), and which are inclined to the a and c axes by ～21 and ～69°, respectively. The distortion of the 1,2,4‐triazine ring in the crystal is compared with gas‐phase ab initio molecular‐orbital calculations.     

2‐Ethyl­phenyl acridine‐9‐carboxyl­ate and 2,5‐dimethyl­phenyl acridine‐9‐carboxyl­ate

The title compounds, 2‐ethyl­phenyl acridine‐9‐carboxyl­ate, C₂₂H₁₇NO₂, (I), and 2,5‐dimethyl­phenyl acridine‐9‐carboxyl­ate, C₂₂H₁₇NO₂, (II), form triclinic and monoclinic crystals, respectively. Related by a centre of symmetry, adjacent molecules of (I) are linked in the lattice via a network of C—H·π and non‐specific dispersive interactions. As a result, acridine moieties and independent phenyl moieties of (I) are parallel in the lattice. The molecules of (II), arranged in a `head‐to‐tail' manner and related by a centre of symmetry, form pairs stabilized via C—H·π interactions. These are linked in the crystal via dispersive interactions. Acridine and independent phenyl moieties lie parallel within the pairs, while adjacent pairs are perpendicular, forming a herring‐bone pattern.     

Synthesis,crystal structure and docking studies of tetracyclic 10‐iodo‐1,2‐dihydroisoquinolino[2,1‐b][1,2,4]benzothiadiazine 12,12‐dioxide and its precursors

The title compound, 10‐iodo‐1,2‐dihydroisoquinolino[2,1‐b][1,2,4]benzothiadiazine 12,12‐dioxide, C₁₅H₁₁IN₂O₂S ( 8 ), was synthesized via the metal‐free intramolecular N‐iodosuccinimide (NIS)‐mediated radical oxidative sp³‐C—H aminative cyclization of 2‐(2′‐aminobenzenesulfonyl)‐1,3,4‐trihydroisoquinoline, C₁₅H₁₆N₂O₂S ( 7 ). The amino adduct 7 was prepared via a two‐step reaction, starting from the condensation of 2‐nitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride ( 4 ) with 1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinoline ( 5 ), to afford 2‐(2′‐nitrobenzenesulfonyl)‐1,3,4‐trihydroisoquinoline, C₁₅H₁₄N₂O₄S ( 6 ), in 82% yield. The catalytic hydrogenation of 6 with hydrogen gas, in the presence of 10% palladium‐on‐charcoal catalyst, furnished 7 . Products 6 – 8 were characterized by their melting points, IR and NMR (¹H and ¹³C) spectroscopy, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The three compounds crystallized in the monoclinic space group, with 7 exhibiting classical intramolecular hydrogen bonds of 2.16 and 2.26 Å. All three crystal structures exhibit centrosymmetric pairs of intermolecular C—H…π(ring) and/or π–π stacking interactions. The docking studies of molecules 6 , 7 and 8 with deoxyribonucleic acid (PDB id: 1ZEW ) revealed minor‐groove binding behaviours without intercalation, with 7 presenting the most favourable global energy of the three molecules. Nonetheless, molecule 8 interacted strongly with the DNA macromolecule, with an attractive van der Waals energy of ?15.53 kcal mol^?1.     

Polymorphism of mer‐μ‐oxalato‐bis[chloridotripyridinecobalt(II)] pyridine disolvate

Single crystals of a triclinic polymorphic form of mer‐μ‐oxalato‐bis[chloridotripyridinecobalt(II)] pyridine disolvate, [Co₂(C₂O₄)Cl₂(C₅H₅N)₆]·2C₅H₅N, have been prepared by solvothermal methods. The structure and geometric parameters strongly resemble those of the previously reported monoclinic polymorph [Bolte (2006). Acta Cryst. E 62 , m597–m598]. In both polymorphic forms, the dinuclear complex molecules are located on a crystallographic centre of inversion, with the Co^II cations in a distorted octahedral environment consisting of a chloride ligand, three pyridine ligands and a chelating bis‐bidentate oxalate ligand. This last serves as a bridging ligand between two Co^II cations. The polymorphs differ in the mutual orientation of their pyridine ligands in the dinuclear molecules and in their intermolecular connectivity. In the triclinic polymorph, C—H...O, C—H...Cl, C—H...π and π–π interactions link the dinuclear molecules into a three‐dimensional structure. Pyridine solvent molecules are attached to this structure via weak interactions.