SERRS study of [Ru(CN)<Subscript>5</Subscript>(pyS)]<Superscript>4−</Superscript> SAM and cytochrome c: A suggestion toward the heterogeneous molecular recognition

Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) spectra of [Ru(CN)₅(pyS)]⁴⁻ (RupyS) complex self-assembled monolayer (SAM) were obtained on gold and silver surfaces at 632.8 and 413.1 nm excitation radiations, respectively. The bands assigned to the heme iron of the cytochrome c (cyt c) metalloprotein group were observed by using the RupyS SAM on silver at 413.1 nm. The Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering (SERRS) spectra of the RupyS SAM on silver in the cyt c solution obtained at −0.2 and +0.2 V present bands at 1,365 and 1,374 cm⁻¹ characteristic of the heme group, indicating the reduced and oxidized states of this protein, respectively. The bands observed at 1,464, 1,504, and 1,638 cm⁻¹ are used to confirm the redox state of cyt c. The presence of the oxidized and reduced bands in function of different applied potential is an evidence that the protein is interacting with the modifier. This paper is dedicated to Prof. Francisco Nart, in memoriam.     

Characterization of the [Ru(CN)5(pyS)] ion complex adsorbed on gold, silver and copper substrates by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

The adsorption of the [Ru(CN)₅(pyS)]⁴⁻ (pyS=4-mercaptopyridine) ion complex on gold, silver and copper surfaces has been studied by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). The influence of the nature of the metallic substrates in the adsorption geometry of the complex is reflected in a strong variation of the SERS spectra, particularly, the relative intensities of characteristic vibrational modes of pyS and CN ligands, which is likely to result from changes in specific chemical interactions involving both ligands and the surface. The effect of the surface modification procedure on the properties of the adsorbed monolayers has also been investigated for the gold surface. Surface modification has been performed by self-assembly or under an electrochemical potential. The spectroscopic results have shown that, according to the modification procedure, the modifier can be bound to the surface via sulfur atom or via CN nitrogen atoms. The ability to control the orientation of the adsorbed monolayer permits control over the properties of the interface, as demonstrated by the study of the electrochemistry of cytochrome-c (cyt-c) on the differently prepared surfaces. A reversible electrochemical response of the metalloprotein is only observed on the self-assembly prepared surface, where CN moieties of the surface modifier are available to interact with the protein molecule.     

Dehydration reaction of hydroxyl substituted alkenes and alkynes on the Ru(2)S(2) complex

A variety of inter- and intramolecular dehydration was found in the reactions of [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)(mu-S(2))](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (1) with hydroxyl substituted alkenes and alkynes. Treatment of 1 with allyl alcohol gave a C(3)S(2) five-membered ring complex, [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-SCH(2)CH(2)CH(OCH(2)CH=CH(2))S]](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (2), via C-S bond formation after C-H bond activation and intermolecular dehydration. On the other hand, intramolecular dehydration was observed in the reaction of 1 with 3-buten-1-ol giving a C(4)S(2) six-membered ring complex, [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2) [mu-SCH(2)CH=CHCH(2)S]](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (3). Complex 1 reacts with 2-propyn-1-ol or 2-butyn-1-ol to give homocoupling products, [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-SCR=CHCH(OCH(2)C triple bond CR)S]](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (4: R = H, 5: R = CH(3)), via intermolecular dehydration. In the reaction with 2-propyn-1-ol, the intermediate complex having a hydroxyl group, [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-SCH=CHCH(OH)S]](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (6), was isolated, which further reacted with 2-propyn-1-ol and 2-butyn-1-ol to give 4 and a cross-coupling product, [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-SCH=CHCH(OCH(2)C triple bond CCH(3))S]](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (7), respectively. The reaction of 1 with diols, (HO)CHRC triple bond CCHR(OH), gave furyl complexes, [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-SSC=CROCR=CH]](CF(3)SO(3))(3) (8: R = H, 9: R = CH(3)) via intramolecular elimination of a H(2)O molecule and a H(+). Even though (HO)(H(3)C)(2)CC triple bond CC(CH(3))(2)(OH) does not have any propargylic C-H bond, it also reacts with 1 to give [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-SCH(2)C(=CH(2))C(=C=C(CH(3))(2))]S](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (10). In addition, the reaction of 1 with (CH(3)O)(H(3)C)(2)CC triple bond CC(CH(3))(2)(OCH(3)) gives [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(2)][mu-S=C(C(CH(3))(2)OCH(3))C=CC(CH(3))CH(2)S][Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)]](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (11), in which one molecule of CH(3)OH is eliminated, and the S-S bond is cleaved.     

Surface coordination of nitric oxide to a self-assembled monolayer of a triruthenium cluster: an in situ infrared spectroscopic study

Coordination of nitric oxide (NO) to a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of a triruthenium (Ru(3)) cluster, [Ru(3)(micro(3)-O)(micro-CH(3)COO)(6)(CO)(L(1))(L(2))] (0) (L(1) = [(NC(5)H(4))CH(2)NHC(O)(CH(2))(10)S-](2), L(2) = 4-methylpyridine), on a gold electrode surface has been studied by electrochemical and in situ infrared (IR) spectroscopic measurements. Ligand substitution reaction of NO for carbon monoxide (CO) ligands in the SAM strongly depends on the oxidation state of the terminal Ru(3) cluster. NO can be introduced into the Ru(3) cluster in the SAM with a high yield after one-electron oxidation of the Ru(3) core to a (III,III,III) oxidation state, while no coordination reaction occurs at the initial oxidation state (II,III,III) of the Ru(3) cluster. The kinetics of the NO coordination and desorption processes is also evaluated by time-resolved in situ IR spectroscopy. Finally, we demonstrate that the SAM with NO/CO randomly mixed ligands at a desired ratio can be constructed on the gold surface by tuning a suitable oxidation state of the Ru 3 cluster under electrochemical control.     

Isolation and molecular structure of hexacyanoruthenate(III)

The [Ru(CN)(6)](3-) ion is synthesized in aqueous solution and isolated as [Ph(4)As](3)[Ru(CN)(6)].2H(2)O (1). Compound 1 crystallizes as orange needles in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/n with cell parameters a = 11.346(2) A, b = 23.107(5) A, c = 25.015(5) A, beta = 99.55(3) degrees, V = 6467.1(22) A(3), Z = 4. The octahedral anion has Ru-C bond lengths in the range 2.023(6)-2.066(6) A. DFT calculations reproduce experimental geometries for [M(CN)(6)](3-) (M = Fe, Ru) equally well and yield significantly higher spin densities on the cyanide ligands in [M(CN)(6)](3-) (M = Ru, Os) than in [Fe(CN)(6)](3-).     

Hybrid cluster-cages formed via cyanometalate condensation: Cs subset Co(4)Ru(6)S(2)(CN)(12), Co(4)Ru(9)S(6)(CN)(9), and Rh(4)Ru(9)S(6)(CN)(9) frameworks

Condensation of cyanometalates and cluster building blocks leads to the formation of hybrid molecular cyanometalate cages. Specifically, the reaction of [Cs subset [CpCo(CN)(3)](4)[CpRu](3)] and [(cymene)(2)Ru(3)S(2)(NCMe)(3)]PF(6) produced [Cs subset [CpCo(CN)(3)](4)[(cymene)(2)Ru(3)S(2)][CpRu](3)](PF(6))(2), Cs subset Co(4)Ru(6)S(2)(2+). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction, NMR spectroscopy, and ESI-MS measurements show that Cs subset Co(4)Ru(6)S(2)(2+ ) consists of a Ru(4)Co(4)(CN)(12) box fused with a Ru(3)S(2) cluster via a common Ru atom. The reaction of PPN[CpCo(CN)(3)] and 0.75 equiv of [(cymene)(2)(MeCN)(3)Ru(3)S(2)](PF(6))(2) in MeCN solution produced [[CpCo(CN)(3)](4)[(cymene)(2)Ru(3)S(2)](3)](PF(6))(2), Co(4)Ru(9)S(6)(2+). Crystallographic analysis, together with NMR and ESI-MS measurements, shows that Co(4)Ru(9)S(6)(2+ ) consists of a Ru(3)Co(4)(CN)(9) "defect box" core, wherein each Ru is fused to a Ru(3)S(2) clusters. The analogous condensation using [CpRh(CN)(3)](-) in place of [CpCo(CN)(3)](-) produced the related cluster-cage Rh(4)Ru(9)S(6)(2+). Electrochemical analyses of both Co(4)Ru(9)S(6)(2+) and Rh(4)Ru(9)S(6)(2+) can be rationalized in the context of reduction at the cluster and the Co(III) subunits, the latter being affected by the presence of alkali metal cations.     

Topological and electron-transfer properties of the 2-thiobarbituric Acid adlayer on polycrystalline gold electrodes

The voltammetric behavior of [Ru(NH(3))(6)](3+) on bare gold and that on 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA)-modified gold surfaces are almost identical, with formal rate constants for the electron-transfer process of 0.25 and 0.21 cm s(-1), respectively. A detailed analysis of the modified surface allowed us to establish that this behavior is due to (i) a high surface coverage of 0.67, (ii) a low adsorption resistance that minimizes the potential drop across the TBA monolayer, (iii) the enhanced hydrophilic character of the modified surface compared with that of bare gold, and (iv) a low decay constant for the electronic coupling of the TBA adlayer that minimizes the tunneling barrier for the electron transfer. The electron-transfer process from Au and Au|TBA electrodes to the soluble [Ru(NH(3))(6)](3+/2+) redox couple can be explained according to the multistate model under the Landau-Zener formalism in the nonadiabatic regime that was recently proposed (Feldberg, S. W.; Sutin, N. Chem. Phys. 2006, 324, 216-225). The behavior of soluble [Ru(NH(3))(6)](3+) changes from semi-infinite linear diffusion on Au to finite-length bounded on Au|TBA, in agreement with a surface dimension of 2.17 for the TBA adlayer with a bidimensional underlying gold surface. This value for the surface dimension was determined by two essentially different electrochemical techniques with different sensing capabilities: cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The estimated dielectric constant of the adlayer (around 37) and the low potential drop across the monolayer suggest the formation of a "mirror" pattern of water molecules in the diffusion layer, which explains this result.     

Bis(amido)ruthenium(IV) Complexes with 2,3-Diamino-2,3-dimethylbutane. Crystal Structure and Reversible Ru(IV)-Amide/Ru(III)-Amine and Ru(IV)-Amide/Ru(II)- Amine Redox Couples in Aqueous Solution

Two bis(amido)ruthenium(IV) complexes, [Ru(IV)(bpy)(L-H)(2)](2+) and [Ru(IV)(L)(L-H)(2)](2+) (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, L = 2,3-diamino-2,3-dimethylbutane, L-H = (H(2)NCMe(2)CMe(2)NH)(-)), were prepared by chemical oxidation of [Ru(II)(bpy)(L)(2)](2+) and the reaction of [(n-Bu)(4)N][Ru(VI)NCl(4)] with L, respectively. The structures of [Ru(bpy)(L-H)(2)][ZnBr(4)].CH(3)CN and [Ru(L)(L-H)(2)]Cl(2).2H(2)O were determined by X-ray crystal analysis. [Ru(bpy)(L-H)(2)][ZnBr(4)].CH(3)CN crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/n with a = 12.597(2) ?, b = 15.909(2) ?, c = 16.785(2) ?, beta = 91.74(1) degrees, and Z = 4. [Ru(L)(L-H)(2)]Cl(2).2H(2)O crystallizes in the tetragonal space group I4(1)/a with a = 31.892(6) ?, c = 10.819(3) ?, and Z = 16. In both complexes, the two Ru-N(amide) bonds are cis to each other with bond distances ranging from 1.835(7) to 1.856(7) ?. The N(amide)-Ru-N(amide) angles are about 110 degrees. The two Ru(IV) complexes are diamagnetic, and the chemical shifts of the amide protons occur at around 13 ppm. Both complexes display reversible metal-amide/metal-amine redox couples in aqueous solution with a pyrolytic graphite electrode. Depending on the pH of the media, reversible/quasireversible 1e(-)-2H(+) Ru(IV)-amide/Ru(III)-amine and 2e(-)-2H(+) Ru(IV)-amide/Ru(II)-amine redox couples have been observed. At pH = 1.0, the E degrees is 0.46 V for [Ru(IV)(bpy)(L-H)(2)](2+)/[Ru(III)(bpy)(L)(2)](3+) and 0.29 V vs SCE for [Ru(IV)(L)(L-H)(2)](2+)/[Ru(III)(L)(3)](3+). The difference in the E degrees values for the two Ru(IV)-amide complexes has been attributed to the fact that the chelating saturated diamine ligand is a better sigma-donor than 2,2'-bipyridine.     

The Electrochemistry of Cytochrome c at a Viologen-thiol Self-Assembled Monolayer

ＴｈｅＥｌｅｃｔｒｏｃｈｅｍｉｓｔｒｙｏｆＣｙｔｏｃｈｒｏｍｅｃａｔａＶｉｏｌｏｇｅｎ－ｔｈｉｏｌＳｅｌｆ－ＡｓｓｅｍｂｌｅｄＭｏｎｏｌａｙｅｒＬＩＪｉｎｇ－ｈｏｎｇ,ＣＨＥＮＧＧｕａｎｇ－ｊｉｎ,ＤＯＮＧＳｈａｏ－ｊｕｎ（ＬａｂｏｒａｔｏｒｙｏｆＥ...     

Regio-selective decoration of nanocavity metal arrays: contributions from localized and delocalized plasmons to surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Spherical cap gold nanocavity arrays with internal diameters of 240, 430, 600 and 820 nm were fabricated on smooth gold films using nanosphere lithography with electrochemical metal deposition. Each array was prepared to the same normalized film thickness to diameter ratios, t(N), of 0.8 ± 0.04. Selective modification of the top surface and interior walls of the gold nanocavity arrays with [Ru(bpy)(2)(Qbpy)](2+), where bpy is 2,2'-bipyridyl and Qbpy is 2,2':4,4':4,4'-quarterpyridyl, was accomplished using a two step adsorption process exploiting the assembled polystyrene spheres as masks. This selective modification approach permitted direct quantitative comparison, for the first time, of plasmonic enhancement of Raman signal and luminescence signal from a monolayer adsorbed at the top surface versus interior walls of all-gold nanocavity arrays. For all cavity sizes, significantly greater Raman and luminescence signal enhancement was observed from [Ru(bpy)(2)(Qbpy)](2+) monolayer adsorbed at the top surface of the array compared with the cavity walls. This disparity in Raman intensity from top versus cavity interior increased as the cavity dimensions decreased. For example, the Raman signal intensity from [Ru(bpy)(2)(Qbpy)](2+) adsorbed at the top surface of 240 nm gold arrays was 170 times greater than SERS signal for this material adsorbed at the interior walls of this array, whereas the relative Raman signal enhancement was 6 from top versus interior for the 820 nm internal radius arrays under 785 nm excitation. The origin of the relatively greater signal at the top surface is discussed in the context of plasmonic distribution at each surface.     

Elimination of sulfur from aromatic heterocycles by a water-soluble arene ruthenium cluster: synthesis and molecular structure of [H2S2Ru4(C6H6)4]Cl2

C-S bond cleavage in thiophene, benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene is achieved under biphasic conditions by the water-soluble cluster cation [H(4)Ru(4)(C(6)H(6))(4)](2+) which is converted into the disulfido cluster [H(2)S(2)Ru(4)(C(6)H(6))(4)](2+).     

Structure and Bonding in Pentacyano(L)ferrate(II) and Pentacyano(L)ruthenate(II) Complexes (L = Pyridine, Pyrazine, and N-Methylpyrazinium): A Density Functional Study

Density Functional Theory (DFT) at the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) level has been applied to the complexes [Fe(CN)(5)L](n-) and [Ru(CN)(5)L](n-) (L = pyridine, pyrazine, N-methylpyrazinium), as well as to [Fe(CN)(5)](3)(-) and [Ru(CN)(5)](3)(-). Full geometry optimizations have been performed in all cases. The geometrical parameters are in good agreement with available information for related systems. The role of the M(II)-L back-bonding was investigated by means of a L and cyanide Mulliken population analysis. For both Fe(II) and Ru(II) complexes the metal-L dissociation energies follow the ordering pyridine < pyrazine < N-methyl pyrazinium, consistent with the predicted sigma-donating and pi-accepting abilities of the L ligands. Also, the computed metal-L bond dissociation energies are systematically smaller in the Ru(II) than in the Fe(II) complexes. This fact suggests that previous interpretations of kinetic data, showing that ruthenium complexes in aqueous solution are more inert than their iron analogues, are not related to a stronger Ru-L bond but are probably due to solvation effects.     

Facile allylic C-H bond activation on the bridging disulfide ligand in the Ru(III) dinuclear complex having a conjugated RuSSRu core

Treatment of [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)(mu-S(2))](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (1), which is prepared by the reaction of [[RuCl(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)](2)(mu-S(2))(mu-Cl)(2)] (2) with 4 equiv of AgCF(3)SO(3), with terminal alkenes such as 1-pentene, allyl ethyl ether, allyl phenyl ether, 1,4-hexadiene, and 3-methyl-1-butene, resulted in the formation of complexes carrying a C(3)S(2) five-membered ring, [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-SCH(2)CH(2)CR(1)R(2)S]](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (3, R(1) = CH(2)CH(3), R(2) = H, 40%; 4, R(1) = OCH(2)CH(3), R(2) = H, 60%; 5, R(1) = OC(6)H(5), R(2) = H, 73%; 6, R(1) = CH=CHCH(3), R(2) = H, 48%; 7, R(1) = R(2) = CH(3), 40%). Reaction of 1 with methylenecycloalkanes was found to give several different types of products, depending on the ring size of the substrates. A trace of [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-SCH(CH(2)CH(2))CH(CH(3))S]](CF(3)SO(3))(4) (9) having a C(2)S(2) four-membered ring to bridge the two Ru atoms was obtained by the reaction of 1 with methylenecyclobutane, whereas the reaction with methylenecyclohexane gave [[Ru(P(OCH(3))(3))(2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](2)[mu-S(CH(2)(C=CHCH(2)CH(2)CH(2)CH(2))S)](CF(3)SO(3))(3) (10) in 69% yield via C-S bond formation and elimination of a proton. Throughout these reactions with alkenes giving a variety of products, the activation of the allylic C-H bond is always the essential and initial key step.     

Sensitization and stabilization of TiO(2) photoanodes with electropolymerized overlayer films of ruthenium and zinc polypyridyl complexes: a stable aqueous photoelectrochemical cell

Overlayer thin films of vinylbipyridine (vbpy)-containing Ru and Zn complexes have been formed on top of ruthenium dye complexes adsorbed to TiO(2) by reductive electropolymerization. The goal was to create an efficient, water-stable photoelectrode or electrodes. An adsorbed-[Ru(vbpy)(2)(dcb)](PF(6))(2)/poly-[Ru(vbpy)(3)](PF(6))(2) surface composite displays excellent stability toward dissolution in water, but the added overlayer film greatly decreases incident photon-to-current conversion efficiencies (IPCE) in propylene carbonate with I(3)(-)/I(-) as the carrier couple. An ads-[Ru(vbpy)(2)(dcb)](PF(6))(2)/poly-[Zn(vbpy)(3)](PF(6))(2) composite displays no loss in IPCE compared to ads-[Ru(vbpy)(2)(dcb)](PF(6))(2) but is susceptible to film breakdown in the presence of water by solvolysis and loss of the cross-linking Zn(2+) ions. Success was attained with an ads-[Ru(vbpy)(2)(dcb)](PF(6))(2)/poly-[Ru(vbpy)(2)(dppe)](PF(6))(2) composite. In this case the electropolymerized layer is transparent in the visible. The composite electrode is stable in water, the IPCE in propylene carbonate with I(3)(-)/I(-) is comparable to the adsorbed complex, and a significant IPCE is observed in water with the quinone/hydroquinone carrier couple. The assembly [(bpy)(2)(CN)Ru(CN)Ru(vbpy)(2)(NC)Ru(CN)(bpy)(2)](PF(6))(2) ([Ru(CN)Ru(NC)Ru](PF(6))(2)) adsorbs spontaneously on TiO(2), and electropolymerization of thin layers of the assembly to give ads-[Ru(CN)Ru(NC)Ru](PF(6))(2)/poly-[Ru(CN)Ru(NC)Ru](PF(6))(2) enhances IPCE and has no deleterious effect on the IPCE/Ru.     

Syntheses of ketonated disulfide-bridged diruthenium complexes via C-H bond activation and C-S bond formation

The alpha-C-H bonds of 3-methyl-2-butanone, 3-pentanone, and 2-methyl-3-pentanone were activated on the sulfur center of the disulfide-bridged ruthenium dinuclear complex [(RuCl(P(OCH3)3)2)2(mu-S2)(mu-Cl)2] (1) in the presence of AgX (X = PF6, SbF6) with concomitant formation of C-S bonds to give the corresponding ketonated complexes [(Ru(CH3CN)2(P(OCH3)3)2)(mu-SSCHR1COR2)(Ru(CH3CN)3(P(OCH3)3)2)]X3 ([5](PF6)3, R1 = H, R2 = CH(CH3)2, X = PF6; [6](PF6)3, R1 = CH3, R2 = CH2CH3, X = PF6; [7](SbF6)3, R1 = CH3, R2 = CH(CH3)2, X = SbF6). For unsymmetric ketones, the primary or the secondary carbon of the alpha-C-H bond, rather than the tertiary carbon, is preferentially bound to one of the two bridging sulfur atoms. The alpha-C-H bond of the cyclic ketone cyclohexanone was cleaved to give the complex [(Ru(CH3CN)2(P(OCH3)3)2)(mu-SS-1- cyclohexanon-2-yl)(Ru(CH3CN)3(P(OCH3)3)2)](SbF6)3 ([8](SbF6)3). And the reactions of acetophenone and p-methoxyacetophenone, respectively, with the chloride-free complex [(Ru(CH3CN)3(P(OCH3)3)2)2(mu-S2)]4+ (3) gave [(Ru(CH3CN)2(P(OCH3)3)2)(mu-SSCH2COAr)(Ru(CH3CN)3(P(OCH3)3)2)](CF3SO3)3 ([9](CF3SO3)3, Ar = Ph; [10](CF3SO3)3, Ar = p-CH3OC6H4). The relative reactivities of a primary and a secondary C-H bond were clearly observed in the reaction of butanone with complex 3, which gave a mixture of two complexes, i.e., [(Ru(CH3CN)2(P(OCH3)3)20(mu-SSCH2COCH2CH3)(Ru(CH3CN)3(P(OCH3)3)2)](CF3SO3)3 ([11](CF3SO3)3) and [(Ru(CH3CN)2(P(OCH3)3)2)(mu-SSCHCH3COCH3)(Ru(CH3CN)3(P(OCH3)2)](CF3SO3)3 ([12](CF3SO3)3), in a molar ratio of 1:1.8. Complex 12 was converted to 11 at room temperature if the reaction time was prolonged. The relative reactivities of the alpha-C-H bonds of the ketones were deduced to be in the order 2 degrees > 1 degree > 3 degrees, on the basis of the consideration of contributions from both electronic and steric effects. Additionally, the C-S bonds in the ketonated complexes were found to be cleaved easily by protonation at room temperature. The mechanism for the formation of the ketonated disulfide-bridged ruthenium dinuclear complexes is as follows: initial coordination of the oxygen atom of the carbonyl group to the ruthenium center, followed by addition of an alpha-C-H bond to the disulfide bridging ligand, having S=S double-bond character, to form a C-S-S-H moiety, and finally completion of the reaction by deprotonation of the S-H bond.     

Kinetics and mechanism of the oxidation of hydroquinones by a trans-dioxoruthenium(VI) complex

The kinetics of the oxidation of hydroquinone (H(2)Q) and its derivatives (H(2)Q-X) by trans-[Ru(VI)(tmc)(O)(2)](2+) (tmc = 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) have been studied in aqueous acidic solutions and in acetonitrile. In H(2)O, the oxidation of H(2)Q has the following stoichiometry: trans-[Ru(VI)(tmc)(O)(2)](2+) + H(2)Q --> trans-[Ru(IV)(tmc)(O)(OH(2))](2+) + Q. The reaction is first order in both Ru(VI) and H(2)Q, and parallel pathways involving the oxidation of H(2)Q and HQ(-) are involved. The kinetic isotope effects are k(H(2)O)/k(D(2)O) = 4.9 and 1.2 at pH = 1.79 and 4.60, respectively. In CH(3)CN, the reaction occurs in two steps, the reduction of trans-[Ru(VI)(tmc)(O)(2)](2+) by 1 equiv of H(2)Q to trans-[Ru(IV)(tmc)(O)(CH(3)CN)](2+), followed by further reduction by another 1 equiv of H(2)Q to trans-[Ru(II)(tmc)(CH(3)CN)(2)](2+). Linear correlations between log(rate constant) at 298.0 K and the O-H bond dissociation energy of H(2)Q-X were obtained for reactions in both H(2)O and CH(3)CN, consistent with a H-atom transfer (HAT) mechanism. Plots of log(rate constant) against log(equilibrium constant) were also linear for these HAT reactions.     

A heterobimetallic ruthenium(II)-copper(II) donor-acceptor complex as a chemodosimetric ensemble for selective cyanide detection

A trinuclear heterobimetallic Ru(II)-Cu(II) donor-acceptor complex, [Ru(II)((t)Bubpy)(CN)(4)-[Cu(II)(dien)](2)](ClO(4))(2) ((t)Bubpy = 4,4'-di-tert-butyl-2,2'-bipyridine; dien = diethylenetriamine) (1), has been synthesized and successfully used as an chemodosimetric ensemble for the specific detection of cyanide in aqueous DMF. X-ray crystallography, solid and solution IR spectroscopy, and conductivity measurements reveal that complex 1 is a one-dimensional polymer in the crystalline state and dissociates into its [Ru(II)((t)Bubpy)(CN)(2)[(CN)Cu(II)(dien)L](2)](2+) (L = solvent) monomeric units in polar solvents. The MLCT transition and luminescence properties of the solvatochromic [Ru(II)((t)Bubpy)(CN)(4)](2)(-) donor are perturbed by the coordination of two Cu(II) acceptors but restored in the presence of CN(-). Spectroscopic and mass spectrometric studies confirm the cleavage of the cyano bridge between Ru(II) and Cu(II) of the chemodosimetric ensemble after the binding of cyanide to the Cu(II) centers. The overall binding constant, K(B), between 1 and CN(-) is measured to be (7.39 +/- 0.23) x 10(6) M(-2). A detection limit of 1.2 microM (0.03 ppm) of CN(-) in aqueous DMF (pH 7.4) is achievable. Thermodynamic evaluation shows that the analyte specificity of chemodosimeter 1 is attributable to the relative stability of the donor-acceptor complex to that of adducts formed between the acceptor metal center and the analytes.     

Synthesis and magnetic properties of 3-D [Ru(II/III)(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)](3)[M(III)(CN)(6)] (M = Cr,Fe, Co)

Three-dimensional network structures of [Ru(II/III)(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)](3)[M(III)(CN)(6)] (M = Cr, Fe, Co) composition have been formed and their magnetic properties characterized. [Ru(II/III)(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)](3)[M(III)(CN)(6)] (M = Cr, Fe, Co) have nu(CN) IR absorptions at 2138, 2116, and 2125 cm(-1) and have body-centered unit cells (a = 13.34, 13.30, and 13.10 A, respectively) with -M-Ctbd1;N-Ru=Ru-Ntbd1;C-M- linkages along all three Cartesian axes. [Ru(II/III)(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)](3)[Cr(III)(CN)(6)] magnetically orders as a ferrimagnet (T(c) = 33 K) and has an unusual constricted hysteresis loop.     

Synthesis, structures, and properties of ruthenium(II) complexes of N-(1,10-phenanthrolin-2-yl)imidazolylidenes

Mononuclear ruthenium complexes [RuCl(L1)(CH(3)CN)(2)](PF(6)) (2a), [RuCl(L2)(CH(3)CN)(2)](PF(6)) (2b), [Ru(L1)(CH(3)CN)(3)](PF(6))(2) (4a), [Ru(L2)(CH(3)CN)(3)](PF(6))(2) (4b), [Ru(L2)(2)](PF(6))(2) (5), [RuCl(L1)(CH(3)CN)(PPh(3))](PF(6)) (6), [RuCl(L1)(CO)(2)](PF(6)) (7), and [RuCl(L1)(CO)(PPh(3))](PF(6)) (8), and a tetranuclear complex [Ru(2)Ag(2)Cl(2)(L1)(2)(CH(3)CN)(6)](PF(6))(4) (3) containing 3-(1,10-phenanthrolin-2-yl)-1-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)imidazolylidene (L1) and 3-butyl-1-(1,10-phenanthrolin-2-yl)imidazolylidene (L2) have been prepared and fully characterized by NMR, ESI-MS, UV-vis spectroscopy, and X-ray crystallography. Both L1 and L2 act as pincer NNC donors coordinated to ruthenium (II) ion. In 3, the Ru(II) and Ag(I) ions are linked by two bridging Cl(-) through a rhomboid Ag(2)Cl(2) ring with two Ru(II) extending to above and down the plane. Complexes 2-8 show absorption maximum over the 354-428 nm blueshifted compared to Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) due to strong σ-donating and weak π-acceptor properties of NHC ligands. Electrochemical studies show Ru(II)/Ru(III) couples over 0.578-1.274 V.     

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of self-assembled monolayers of ruthenium complexes on gold

Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of three ruthenium complexes, [Ru(L)(2)](PF(6))(2), [Ru(L)(tpyPO(3))](PF(6))(2), and [Ru(L18)(tpyPO(3))](PF(6))(2), were prepared on evaporated gold films on glass or stainless steel plates; where L = 2, 6-bis(benzimidazoyl)pyridine, tpyPO(3) = 2,6-bis(2,2':6', 2"-terpyridyl)pyridine phosphanate, and L18 = 2, 6-bis(N-octadecylbenzimidazoyl)pyridine. Structures of these SAM complexes were studied by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOFMS). The SAMs were either prepared by direct binding of Ru-complexes to Au films by alkanethiol or by the multilayer method. In the multilayer method 1,4-thiobutylphosphate was used to form a base layer on an Au film, and the base layer was then chemically bridged to the Ru-complexes by zirconium phosphate. MALDI-TOFMS of SAM1, that had been prepared by direct binding of [Ru(L)(2)](PF(6))(2) to the Au film by an octanethiol group, showed cleavage at the S-Au linkages and elimination of the counter anion to yield a molecular ion and its dimeric ion. On the other hand, SAM2 and SAM3, which had been prepared by bridging Ru-complexes [Ru(L)(tpyPO(3))](PF(6))(2) or [Ru(L18)(tpyPO(3))](PF(6))(2) to the base layers with zirconium phosphate, showed dissociation from the base layers and elimination of the counter anion to give ions of the Ru complex molecules and their fragmentation ions. No molecular ion containing the base layer resulting from the S-Au bond cleavage was observed. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.