The 3[ndσ*(n+1)pσ] Emissions of Linear Silver(I) and Gold(I) Chains with Bridging Phosphine Ligands

The complexes [Au₃(dcmp)₂][X]₃ {dcmp=bis(dicyclohexylphosphinomethyl)cyclohexylphosphine; X=Cl^? ( 1 ), ClO₄^? ( 2 ), OTf^? ( 3 ), PF₆^? ( 4 ), SCN^?( 5 )}, [Ag₃(dcmp)₂][ClO₄]₃ ( 6 ), and [Ag₃(dcmp)₂Cl₂][ClO₄] ( 7 ) were prepared and their structures were determined by X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 2 – 4 display a high‐energy emission band with λ_max at 442–452 nm, whereas 1 and 5 display a low‐energy emission with λ_max at 558–634 nm in both solid state and in dichloromethane at 298 K. The former is assigned to the ³[5dσ*6pσ] excited state of [Au₃(dcmp)₂]³⁺, whereas the latter is attributed to an exciplex formed between the ³[5dσ*6pσ] excited state of [Au₃(dcmp)₂]³⁺ and the counterions. In solid state, complex [Ag₃(dcmp)₂][ClO₄]₃ ( 6 ) displays an intense emission band at 375 nm with a Stokes shift of ≈7200 cm^?1 from the ¹[4dσ*→5pσ] absorption band at 295 nm. The 375 nm emission band is assigned to the emission directly from the ³[4dσ^*5pσ] excited state of 6 . Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that the absorption and emission energies are inversely proportional to the number of metal ions (n) in polynuclear Au^I and Ag^I linear chain complexes without close metal???anion contacts. The emission energies are extrapolated to be 715 and 446 nm for the infinite linear Au^I and Ag^I chains, respectively, at metal???metal distances of about 2.93–3.02 Å. A QM/MM calculation on the model [Au₃(dcmp)₂Cl₂]⁺ system, with Au???Cl contacts of 2.90–3.10 Å, gave optimized Au???Au distances of 2.99–3.11 Å in its lowest triplet excited state and the emission energies were calculated to be at approximately 600–690 nm, which are assigned to a three‐coordinate Au^I site with its spectroscopic properties affected by Au^I???Au^I interactions.     

Formation,Expansion, and Interconversion of Metallarings in a Sulfur‐Bridged AuICoIII Coordination System

A novel Au^ICo^III coordination system that is derived from the newly prepared [Co(D ‐nmp)₂]⁻ ( 1 ⁻; D ‐nmp=N‐methyl‐D ‐penicillaminate) and a gold(I) precursor Au^I is reported. Complex 1 ⁻ acts as a sulfur‐donating metallaligand and reacts with the gold(I) precursor to give [Au₂Co₂(D ‐nmp)₄] ( 2 ), which has an eight‐membered Au^I₂Co^III₂ metallaring. Treatment of 2 with [Au₂(dppe)₂]²⁺ (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) leads to the formation of [Au₄Co₂(dppe)₂(D ‐nmp)₄]²⁺ ( 3 ²⁺), which consists of an 18‐membered Au^I₄Co^III₂ metallaring that accommodates a tetrahedral anion (BF₄⁻, ClO₄⁻, ReO₄⁻). In solution, the metallaring structure of 3 ²⁺ is readily interconvertible with the nine‐membered Au^I₂Co^III metallaring structure of [Au₂Co(dppe)(D ‐nmp)₂]⁺ ( 4 ⁺); this process depends on external factors, such as solvent, concentration, and nature of the counteranion. These results reveal the lability of the Au S and Au P bonds, which is essential for metallaring expansion and contraction.     

Theoretical study of the electronic spectrum of binuclear gold(I) complexes

The electronic structure and the spectroscopic properties of [Au₂(CS₃)₂]^?2, [Au₂(pym‐2‐S)₂] (pym = pyrimidethiolate), [Au₂(dpm)₂]⁺² (dpm = bis(diphosphino)methane) were studied using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level. The absorption spectrum of these binuclear gold(I) complexes was calculated by single excitation time‐dependent (TD) method. All complexes showed a ¹(5dσ* → 6pσ) transition associated with a metal–metal charge transfer, which is strongly interrelated with the gold–gold distance. Furthermore, we have calculated the frequency of the gold–gold vibration (ν_Au2) on the above complexes. The values obtained are theoretically in agreement with experimental range. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005     

Deciphering Photoluminescence Dynamics and Reactivity of the Luminescent Metal–Metal‐Bonded Excited State of a Binuclear Gold(I) Phosphine Complex Containing Open Coordination Sites

Luminescent metal complexes having open coordination sites hold promise in the design of sensory materials and photocatalysts. As a prototype example, [Au₂(dcpm)₂)]²⁺ (dcpm = bis(dicyclohexylphosphanyl) is known for its intriguing environmental sensitive photoluminescence. By integrating a range of complementary ultrafast time‐resolved spectroscopy to interrogate the excited state dynamics, this study uncovers that the events occurring in extremely rapid timescales and which are modulated strongly by environmental conditions play a pivotal role in the luminescence behavior and photochemical outcomes. Formed independent of the phase and solvent property within ～0.15 ps, the metal–metal bonded ³5dσ*6pσ state is highly reactive possessing strong propensity toward increasing coordination number at Au^I center, and with ～510 ps lifetime in dichloromethane is able to mediate light induced C–X bond cleavage.     

Formation,Expansion, and Interconversion of Metallarings in a Sulfur‐Bridged AuICoIII Coordination System

A novel Au^ICo^III coordination system that is derived from the newly prepared [Co(D ‐nmp)₂]^? ( 1 ^?; D ‐nmp=N‐methyl‐D ‐penicillaminate) and a gold(I) precursor Au^I is reported. Complex 1 ^? acts as a sulfur‐donating metallaligand and reacts with the gold(I) precursor to give [Au₂Co₂(D ‐nmp)₄] ( 2 ), which has an eight‐membered Au^I₂Co^III₂ metallaring. Treatment of 2 with [Au₂(dppe)₂]²⁺ (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) leads to the formation of [Au₄Co₂(dppe)₂(D ‐nmp)₄]²⁺ ( 3 ²⁺), which consists of an 18‐membered Au^I₄Co^III₂ metallaring that accommodates a tetrahedral anion (BF₄^?, ClO₄^?, ReO₄^?). In solution, the metallaring structure of 3 ²⁺ is readily interconvertible with the nine‐membered Au^I₂Co^III metallaring structure of [Au₂Co(dppe)(D ‐nmp)₂]⁺ ( 4 ⁺); this process depends on external factors, such as solvent, concentration, and nature of the counteranion. These results reveal the lability of the Au? S and Au? P bonds, which is essential for metallaring expansion and contraction.     

Dinuclear complex of gold(III) with 1,3-diaminopropane (HL), [Au<Subscript>2</Subscript>(HL)(L)<Subscript>2</Subscript>](ClO<Subscript>4</Subscript>)<Subscript>3</Subscript>(OH): Synthesis and crystal and molecular structures

The dinuclear gold(III) complex, [Au₂(HL)(L)₂](ClO₄)₃(OH) (I) (HL = 1,3-diaminopropane), with two amide bridges has been synthesized for the first time. According to the X-ray diffraction data, the crystal structure of complex I consists of the complex cations [Au₂(HL)(L)₂]⁴⁺ and anions ClO₄⁻ and OH⁻. The coordination sites AuN₄ are insignificantly distorted squares. In the four-membered ring Au₂N₂, the gold atoms are bound by the bridging nitrogen atoms of the deprotonated primary amine.     

Luminescent Di‐ and Polynuclear Organometallic Gold(I)–Metal (Au2, {Au2Ag}n and {Au2Cu}n) Compounds Containing Bidentate Phosphanes as Active Antimicrobial Agents

The reaction of new dinuclear gold(I) organometallic complexes containing mesityl ligands and bridging bidentate phosphanes [Au₂(mes)₂(μ‐LL)] (LL=dppe: 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphano)ethane 1 a , and water‐soluble dppy: 1,2‐bis(di‐3‐pyridylphosphano)ethane 1 b ) with Ag⁺ and Cu⁺ lead to the formation of a family of heterometallic clusters with mesityl bridging ligands of the general formula [Au₂M(μ‐mes)₂(μ‐LL)][A] (M=Ag, A=ClO₄^?, LL=dppe 2 a , dppy 2 b ; M=Ag, A=SO₃CF₃^?, LL=dppe 3 a , dppy 3 b ; M=Cu, A=PF₆^?, LL=dppe 4 a , dppy 4 b ). The new compounds were characterized by different spectroscopic techniques and mass spectrometry The crystal structures of [Au₂(mes)₂(μ‐dppy)] ( 1 b ) and [Au₂Ag(μ‐mes)₂(μ‐dppe)][SO₃CF₃] ( 3 a ) were determined by a single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction study. 3 a in solid state is not a cyclic trinuclear Au₂Ag derivative but it gives an open polymeric structure instead, with the {Au₂(μ‐dppe)} fragments “linked” by {Ag(μ‐mes)₂} units. The very short distances of 2.7559(6) Å (Au? Ag) and 2.9229(8) Å (Au? Au) are indicative of gold–silver (metallophilic) and aurophilic interactions. A systematic study of their luminescence properties revealed that all compounds are brightly luminescent in solid state, at room temperature (RT) and at 77 K, or in frozen DMSO solutions with lifetimes in the microsecond range and probably due to the self‐aggregation of [Au₂M(μ‐mes)₂(μ‐LL)]⁺ units (M=Ag or Cu; LL=dppe or dppy) into an extended chain structure, through Au? Au and/or Au? M metallophilic interactions, as that observed for 3 a . In solid state the heterometallic Au₂M complexes with dppe ( 2 a – 4 a ) show a shift of emission maxima (from ca. 430 to the range of 520‐540 nm) as compared to the parent dinuclear organometallic product 1 a while the complexes with dppy ( 2 b–4 b ) display a more moderate shift (505 for 1 b to a max of 563 nm for 4 b ). More importantly, compound [Au₂Ag(μ‐mes)₂(μ‐dppy)]ClO₄ ( 2 b ) resulted luminescent in diluted DMSO solution at room temperature. Previously reported compound [Au₂Cl₂(μ‐LL)] (LL dppy 5 b ) was also studied for comparative purposes. The antimicrobial activity of 1–5 and Ag[A] (A=ClO₄^?, SO₃CF₃^?) against Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria and yeast was evaluated. Most tested compounds displayed moderate to high antibacterial activity while heteronuclear Au₂M derivatives with dppe ( 2 a – 4 a ) were the more active (minimum inhibitory concentration 10 to 1 μg mL^?1). Compounds containing silver were ten times more active to Gram‐negative bacteria than the parent dinuclear compound 1 a or silver salts. Au₂Ag compounds with dppy ( 2 b , 3 b ) were also potent against fungi.     

Spin Crossover Behavior of FeII Complexes Bridged by Thiophene-Functionalized Triazole Ligands with Different Sizes and Rigidities

Four thiophene functionalized triazole ligands (L1=4-(thenyl)-1,2,4-triazole, L2=4-(thiophene ethyl)-1,2,4-triazole, L3=N-Thiophenylidene-4H-1,2,4-triazole-4-amine, and L4=(4-[(E)-2-(5-sulfothiophene)vinyl]-1,2,4-triazole) were synthesized. These ligands have different lengths and rigidities, while ligand L4 has a sulfonic acid group that can form a hydrogen bond. Five 1D Fe^II chain complexes were synthesized: [Fe(L1)₃](X)₂ ⋅ nH₂O [X=BF₄⁻, n=1.5 ( C1 ); X=ClO₄⁻, n=1 ( C2 )], [Fe(L2)₃](BF₄)₂ ⋅ 1.5H₂O ( C3 ); [Fe(L3)₃](X)₂ ⋅ nH₂O [X=BF₄⁻, n=2 ( C4 ); X=ClO₄⁻, n=2.5 ( C5 )]. The results of temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility reveal that complexes C1 , C2 , and C3 experienced the transition between two spin states. And C4 and C5 maintain high spin states at all temperature ranges. Binuclear complex [Fe₂(L3)₅(SCN)₄] ( C6 ) and mononuclear material [Fe(L4)₂(H₂O)₄] ⋅ 2H₂O ( C7 ), these two zero-dimensional molecules were also synthesized. They all display weak antiferromagnetic exchange coupling and a high spin state in the whole process.     

Neue Gold‐Selen‐Komplexverbindungen: Synthesen und Strukturen von [Au10Se4(dpppe)4]Br2, [Au2Se(dppbe)]∞, [(Au3Se)2(dppbp)3]Cl2 und [Au34Se14(tpep)6(tpepSe)2]Cl6

Novel Gold Selenium Complexes: Syntheses and Structures of [Au₁₀Se₄(dpppe)₄]Br₂, [Au₂Se(dppbe)]_∞, [(Au₃Se)₂(dppbp)₃]Cl₂, and [Au₃₄Se₁₄(tpep)₆(tpep^Se)₂]Cl₆ The reaction of gold phosphine complexes [(AuX)(PR₃)] (X= halogen; R = org. group) with Se(SiMe₃)₂ yield to new chalcogeno bridged gold complexes. Especially within the use of polydentate phosphine ligands cluster complexes like [Au₁₀Se₄(dpppe)₄]Br₂ ( 1 ) (dpppe = 1, 5‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)pentane), [Au₂Se(dppbe)]_∞ ( 2 ) (1, 4‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene), [(Au₃Se)₂(dppbp)₃]Cl₂ ( 3 ) (dppbp = 4, 4′‐Bis‐diphenylphosphino)biphenyl) und [Au₃₄Se₁₄(tpep)₆(tpep^Se)₂]Cl₆ ( 4 ) (tpep = 1, 1, 1‐Tris(diphenylphosphinoethyl)phosphine, tpep^Se = 1, 1‐Bis(diphenylphosphinoethyl)‐1‐(diphenylselenophosphinoethylphosphine) could be isolated and their structures could be determined by X‐ray diffraction. ( 1: Space group P1 (No. 2), Z = 2, a = 1642.1(11), b = 1713.0(9), c = 2554.0(16) pm, α = 80.41(3)°, β = 76.80(4)°, γ = 80.92(4)°; 2: Space group P2₁/n (No. 14), Z = 4, a = 947.3(2), b = 1494.9(3), c = 2179.6(7) pm, β = 99.99(3)°; 3: Space group P2₁/c (No. 14), Z = 8, a = 2939.9(6), b = 3068.4(6), c = 3114.5(6) pm, β = 109.64(3)°; 4: Space group P1 (No. 2), Z = 1, a = 2013.7(4), b = 2420.6(5), c = 2462.5(5) pm, α = 77.20(3), β = 74.92(3), γ = 87.80(3)°).     

A charge-separation-type ionic solid composed of hexanuclear complexes with a macrocyclic tetragold(I) metalloligand

The reaction of Na[Co^III(d -ebp)] (d -H₄ebp = N,N′-ethylenebis[d -penicillamine]) with [(Au^ICl)₂(dppe)] (dppe = 1,2-bis[diphenylphosphino]ethane) gave a cationic Au^I₄Co^III₂ hexanuclear complex, [Co^III₂(L^Au4)]²⁺ ([ 1 ]²⁺), where [L^Au4]⁴⁻ is a cyclic tetragold(I) metalloligand with a 32-membered ring, [Au^I₄(dppe)₂(d -ebp)₂]⁴⁻. Complex [ 1 ]²⁺ crystallized with NO₃⁻ to produce a charge-separation (CS)-type ionic solid of [ 1 ](NO₃)₂. In [ 1 ](NO₃)₂, the complex cations are assembled to form cationic supramolecular hexamers of {[ 1 ]²⁺}₆, which are closely packed in a face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice structure. The nitrate anions of [ 1 ](NO₃)₂ were accommodated in hydrophilic and hydrophobic tetrahedral interstices of the fcc structure to form tetrameric and hexameric nitrate clusters of {NO₃⁻}₄ and {NO₃⁻}₆, respectively. An analogous CS-type ionic solid formulated as [Ni^IICo^III(L^Au4)](NO₃) ([ 2 ](NO₃)) was obtained when a 1:1 mixture of Na[Co^III(d -ebp)] and [Ni^II(d -H₂ebp)] was reacted with [(Au^ICl)₂(dppe)], accompanied by the conversion of the diamagnetic, square-planar [Ni^II(d -H₂ebp)] to the paramagnetic, octahedral [Ni^II(d -ebp)]²⁻. While the overall fcc structure in [ 2 ](NO₃) was similar to that of [ 1 ](NO₃)₂, none of the nitrate anions were accommodated in any hydrophobic tetrahedral interstice, reflecting the difference in the complex charges between [ 1 ]²⁺ and [ 2 ]⁺.     

Counter‐Anion‐Regulated Mixed‐Valency of Cobalt(II/III) Centers in a Metallosupramolecular Framework

A diamagnetic Au^I₄Co^III₂ hexanuclear complex, [Au₄Co₂(dppe)₂(l ‐nmc)₄]²⁺ ([ 1_{L ‐ nmc} ]²⁺; dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, l ‐H₂nmc=N‐methyl‐l ‐cysteine), was newly synthesized by the reaction of [Co(l ‐nmc)₂]^? with [Au₂Cl₂(dppe)] and crystallized with different inorganic anions (X=ClO₄^?, NO₃^?, Cl^?, SO₄^2?) to produce ionic solids ([ 1_{L ‐ nmc} ]X_n). Single‐crystal X‐ray analysis revealed that all the solids crystallize in the chiral space group F432 with a face‐centered‐cubic lattice structure consisting of supramolecular octahedra of complex cations. The paramagnetic nature of all the solids was evidenced by magnetic susceptibility measurements, showing the variation of the oxidation states of two cobalt centers in [ 1_{L ‐ nmc} ]ⁿ⁺ from Co^II_1.00Co^III_1.00 for X=ClO₄^? or NO₃^? to Co^II_0.67Co^III_1.33 for X=Cl^?, via Co^II_0.83Co^III_1.17 for X=SO₄^2?. The difference in the Co^II/III mixed‐valences was explained by the difference in sizes and charges of counter anions accommodated in lattice interstices with a fixed volume.     

An Extremely Porous Hydrogen‐Bonded Framework Composed of d‐Penicillaminato CoIII2AuI3 Complex Anions and Aqua Cobalt(II) Cations: Formation and Stepwise Structural Transformation

A unique example of a hydrogen‐bonded ionic solid with a porosity of 80 %, [Co(H₂O)₆]₃[Co₂Au₃(d ‐pen‐N,S)₆]₂ ( 1 ; d ‐H₂pen=d ‐penicillamine), composed of [Co(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cations and [Co₂Au₃(d ‐pen‐N,S)₆]^3? anions, is reported. Solid 1 was kinetically produced and was then transformed stepwise into two more thermodynamically stable solids with lower porosities, [Co(H₂O)₄][Co(H₂O)₆]₂[Co₂Au₃(d ‐pen‐N,S)₆]₂ ( 2 ) and [Co(H₂O)₄]₃[Co₂Au₃(d ‐pen‐N,S)₆]₂ ( 3 ), through the coordination of the free carboxylate groups in [Co₂Au₃(d ‐pen‐N,S)₆]^3? to Co^II centers. Solids 1 – 3 were structurally characterized, and the selective adsorption of small molecules into their pores was investigated.     

Cluster chemistry: XXX. Reaction of a triruthenium anion with [O{Au(PPh3)}3][BF4]: Synthesis and structure of Ru3Au3(μ3-2η1,η3-C12H15)(CO)8(PPh3)3

The cluster HRu₃(μ₃-C₁₂H₁₅)(CO)₉ is rapidly deprotonated by K[HBBu₃^sec] in tetrahydrofuran, generating the anion [Ru₃(μ₃-C₁₂H₁₅)(CO)₉]^? in high yield. Reaction between this anion and [O{Au(PPh₃)}₃][BF₄] gives Ru₃Au₃(μ₃-C₁₂H₁₅)(CO)₈(PPh₃)₃ (2) as the main product, shown by an X-ray study to contain a capped trigonal-bipyramidal Ru₃Au₃ core in which the C₁₂H₁₅ ligand is bonded in the μ₃-2η¹,η³ fashion to the Ru₃ face. An alternative formulation involving the cyclo-Au₃(PPh₃)₃ moiety acting as a three-electron donor to the Ru₃ cluster is discussed. Crystals of 2 are monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, a 13.574(1), b 40.634(4), c 14.617(2) Å, β 92.58(1)°, Z = 4; 3233 data with I > 3σ(I) were refined to R = 0.078, R_w = 0.084.     

Quantum-chemical study of the effect of ligands on the structure and properties of gold clusters

The structures of [Au₄(dpmp)₂X₂]²⁺clusters, where Х =–C≡CH,–СН₃,–SCH₃,–F,–Cl,–Br,–I, dpmp is bis((diphenylphosphino)methyl)(phenyl)phosphine, are calculated at the level of density functional theory with the PBE functional and a modified Dirac–Coulomb–Breit Hamiltonian in an all-electron basis set (Λ). Using the example of [Au₄(dpmp)₂(С≡CС₆Н₅)₂]²⁺, the interatomic distances and bond angles calculated by means of PBE0/LANL2DZ, TPSS/LANL2DZ, TPSSh/LANL2DZ, and PBE/Λ are compared to X-ray crystallography data. It is shown that PBE/Λ yields the most accurate calculation of the geometrical parameters of this cluster. The ligand effect on the electronic stability of a cluster and the stability in reactions of decomposition into different fragments is studied, along with the capability of ligand exchange. Stability is predicted for [Au₄(dpmp)₂F₂]²⁺ and [Au₄(dpmp)₂(SCH₃)₂]²⁺, while [Au₄(dpmp)₂I₂]²⁺ cluster is unstable and its decomposes into two identical fragments is supposed.

     

Energy-level tailoring in a series of redox-rich quinonoid-bridged diruthenium complexes containing tris2-pyridylmethyl)amine as a co-ligand

Reactions of [{Ru(tmpa)}₂(μ‐Cl)₂][ClO₄]₂, ( 2 [ClO₄]₂, tmpa=tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine) with 2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinone ( L¹ ), 2,5‐di‐[2,6‐(dimethyl)‐anilino]‐1,4‐benzoquinone ( L² ), or 2,5‐di‐[2,4,6‐(trimethyl)‐anilino)]‐1,4‐benzoquinone ( L³ ) in the presence of a base led to the formation of the dinuclear complexes [{Ru(tmpa)}₂(μ‐ L¹ _{?2 H})][ClO₄]₂ ( 3 [ClO₄]₂), [{Ru(tmpa)}₂(μ‐ L² _{?2 H})][ClO₄]₂ ( 4 [ClO₄]₂), and [{Ru(tmpa)}₂(μ‐ L³ _{?2 H})][ClO₄]₂ ( 5 [ClO₄]₂). Structural characterization of 5 [ClO₄]₂ showed the localization of the double bonds within the quinonoid ring and a twisting of the mesityl substituents with respect to the quinonoid plane. Cyclic voltammetry of the complexes show two reversible oxidation and quinonoid‐based reduction processes. Results obtained from UV/Vis/NIR and EPR spectroelectrochemistry are invoked to discuss ruthenium‐ versus quinonoid‐ligand‐centered redox activity. The complex 3 [ClO₄]₂ is compared to the reported complex [{Ru(bpy)}₂(μ‐ L¹ _{?2 H})]²⁺ ( 1²⁺ , bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine). The effects of substituting the bidentate and better π‐accepting bpy co‐ligands with tetradentate tmpa ligands [pure σ‐donating (amine) as well as σ‐donating and π‐accepting (pyridines)] on the redox and electronic properties of the complexes are discussed. Comparisons are also made between complexes containing the dianionic forms of the all‐oxygen‐donating L¹ ligand with the L² and L³ ligands containing an [O,N,O,N] donor set. The one‐electron oxidized forms of the complexes show absorption in the NIR region. The position as well as the intensity of this band can be tuned by the substituents on the quinonoid bridge. In addition, this band can be switched on and off by using tunable redox potentials, making such systems attractive candidates for NIR electrochromism.     

Unusual Metal–Metal Bonding in a Dinuclear Pt–Au Complex: Snapshot of a Transmetalation Process

The dinuclear Pt–Au complex [(CNC)(PPh₃)Pt Au(PPh₃)](ClO₄) ( 2 ) (CNC=2,6‐diphenylpyridinate) was prepared. Its crystal structure shows a rare metal–metal bonding situation, with very short Pt–Au and Au–C_ipso(CNC) distances and dissimilar Pt–C_ipso(CNC) bonds. Multinuclear NMR spectra of 2 show the persistence of the Pt–Au bond in solution and the occurrence of unusual fluxional behavior involving the [Pt^II] and [Au^I] metal fragments. The [Pt^II]??? [Au^I] interaction has been thoroughly studied by means of DFT calculations. The observed bonding situation in 2 can be regarded as a model for an intermediate in a transmetalation process.     

Same Magic Number but Different Arrangement: Alkynyl‐Protected Au25 with D3 Symmetry

Two homoleptic alkynyl‐protected gold clusters with compositions of Na[Au₂₅(C≡CAr)₁₈] and (Ph₄P)[Au₂₅(C≡CAr)₁₈] (Na? 1 and Ph₄P? 1 , Ar=3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl) were synthesized via a direct reduction method. 1 is a magic cluster analogous to [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? in terms of electron counts and metal‐to‐ligand ratio. Single‐crystal structure analysis reveals that 1 has an identical Au₁₃ kernel to [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^?, but adopts a distinctly different arrangement of the six peripheral dimer staple motifs. The steric hindrance of alkynyl ligands is responsible for the D₃ arrangement of Au₂₅. The introduction of alkynyl also significantly changes the optical absorption features of the nanocluster as supported by DFT calculations. This magic cluster confirms that there is a similar but quite different parallel alkynyl‐protected metal cluster universe in comparison to the thiolated one.     

Kinetics and mechanism of the oxidation of glycolaldehyde by tetrachloroaurate(III)

The kinetics of the reaction between glycolaldehyde (GA) and tetrachloroaurate(III) in acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer has been studied. The reaction is first-order with respect to [Au^III] as well as [GA]. Both H⁺ and Cl⁻ ions retard the rate of reaction. AuCl₄⁻, AuCl₃(OH₂), and AuCl₃(OH)⁻ are the reactive species of gold(III) with gradually increasing reactivity. A reaction mechanism involving two-electron transfer rate determining steps has been proposed. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet: 30: 613–619, 1998     

Syntheses,characterisation and solid state thermal studies of 1-(2-aminoethyl)piperidine (L), 1-(2-aminoethyl)pyrrolidine (L′) and 4-(2-aminoethyl)morpholine (L″) complexes of nickel(II): X-ray single crystal structure analyses of trans-[NiL2(CH3CN)2](ClO4)2, trans-[NiL2(NCS)2] and trans-[NiL″2(NCS)2]

Reactions of nickel(II) salts with substituted ethane-1,2-diamine where one of the amine nitrogens is a part of a flexible cyclic ring, e.g. 1-(2-aminoethyl)piperidine (L), 1-(2-aminoethyl)pyrrolidine (L′) and 4-(2-aminoethyl)morpholine (L″) produce a number of complexes of the type: (i) Ni(AA)₂X₂ (where X=CF₃CO₂ ⁻, SCN⁻ and NO₂ ⁻; AA represents L/L′/L″); (ii) Ni(AA)₂(CH₃CN)₂X₂ (X=ClO₄ ⁻ and NO₃ ⁻); (iii) Ni(AA)₂(H₂O)₂X₂ (X=CF₃SO₃ ⁻, Cl⁻, Br⁻ and I⁻); and (iv) Ni(AA)₂(H₂O)₄X₂ (X=0.5SO₄ ²⁻, 0.5SeO₄ ²⁻ and CF₃SO₃ ⁻). The complexes possess octahedral geometry. The major complexes upon desolvation retain trans-geometry, some of which are cis with respect to the counter-anion and a few of them are square planar. X-ray single crystal structure analyses of trans-[NiL₂(CH₃CN)₂](ClO₄)₂, trans-[NiL₂(NCS)₂] (violet) and trans-[NiL″₂(NCS)₂] (sky-blue) have been done. The violet and sky-blue thiocyanato species have blue and green coloured isomers, respectively, and these pairs of isomers are proposed to be conformational isomers. Solid state thermal investigation of the complexes has been carried out. The complexes show thermochromism due to deaquation–anation/deaquation reaction/change of conformation. Only [NiL₂](ClO₄)₂, [NiL′₂(CF₃CO₂)₂] and [NiL″₂(NO₂)₂] undergo thermally induced phase transition. The effect of flexible ring size on diamine has been discussed.     

Die photochemische synthese von μ-(1-2-η:2-3-η-allen)-octacarbonyldimangan(0)

Novel dihydroiridium(III) complexes containing mono- and bi-dentate sulfur ligands have been isolated. The cationic complexes [Ir(COD)L₂]ClO₄ (COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene, L = tetrahydrothiophene (tht) or trimethylene sulfide (tms); L₂ = (CH₃S)₂(CH₂)₃ (dth)), [Ir(COD)(L-L)]₂(ClO₄)₂ (L-L = 1,4-dithiacyclohexane (dt) or (t-BuS)₂(CH₂)₂ (tmdto)) and [Ir(CO)₂(tmdto)]₂-(ClO₄)₂ react with H₂ to give the corresponding iridium(III) dihydrides: [IrH₂COD)L₂]ClO₄ (Ia: L = tht, Ib: L = tms, Ic: L₂ = dth), [IrH₂(COD)-(L-L)]₂(ClO₄)₂ (IIa: L-L = tmdto, IIb: L-L = dt) and [IrH₂(CO)₂(tmdto)]₂-(ClO₄)₂ (III). The ¹H NMR chemical shifts and ν(IrH) data are discussed.