Sum List Coloring Graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph with n vertices and e edges. The sum choice number of G is the smallest integer p such that there exist list sizes (f(v):v ∈ V) whose sum is p for which G has a proper coloring no matter which color lists of size f(v) are assigned to the vertices v. The sum choice number is bounded above by n+e. If the sum choice number of G equals n+e, then G is sum choice greedy. Complete graphs K_n are sum choice greedy as are trees. Based on a simple, but powerful, lemma we show that a graph each of whose blocks is sum choice greedy is also sum choice greedy. We also determine the sum choice number of K_2,n, and we show that every tree on n vertices can be obtained from K_n by consecutively deleting single edges where all intermediate graphs are sc-greedy.     

Chromatic capacity and graph operations

The chromatic capacityχ_cap(G) of a graph G is the largest k for which there exists a k-coloring of the edges of G such that, for every coloring of the vertices of G with the same colors, some edge is colored the same as both its vertices. We prove that there is an unbounded function f:N→N such that χ_cap(G)?f(χ(G)) for almost every graph G, where χ denotes the chromatic number. We show that for any positive integers n and k with k?n/2 there exists a graph G with χ(G)=n and χ_cap(G)=n-k, extending a result of Greene. We obtain bounds on that are tight as r→∞, where is the complete n-partite graph with r vertices in each part. Finally, for any positive integers p and q we construct a graph G with χ_cap(G)+1=χ(G)=p that contains no odd cycles of length less than q.     

Sum List Coloring Block Graphs

A graph is f-choosable if for every collection of lists with list sizes specified by f there is a proper coloring using colors from the lists. We characterize f-choosable functions for block graphs (graphs in which each block is a clique, including trees and line graphs of trees). The sum choice number is the minimum over all choosable functions f of the sum of the sizes in f. The sum choice number of any graph is at most the number of vertices plus the number of edges. We show that this bound is tight for block graphs.Acknowledgments. Partially supported by a grant from the Reidler Foundation. The author would like to thank an anonymous referee for useful comments.     

Precoloring extension for 2-connected graphs with maximum degree three

Let G=G(V,E) be a simple graph, L a list assignment with |L(v)|=Δ(G)∀v∈V and W⊆V an independent subset of the vertex set. Define to be the minimum distance between two vertices of W. In this paper it is shown that if G is 2-connected with Δ(G)=3 and G is not K₄ then every precoloring of W is extendable to a proper list coloring of G provided that d(W)≥6. An example shows that the bound is sharp. This result completes the investigation of precoloring extensions for graphs with |L(v)|=Δ(G) for all v∈V where the precolored set W is an independent set.     

Decompositions of pseudographs into closed trails of even sizes

We consider a graph L_n, with n even, which is a complete graph with an additional loop at each vertex and minus a 1-factor and we prove that it is edge-disjointly decomposable into closed trails of even lengths greater than four, whenever these lengths sum up to the size of the graph L_n. We also show that this statement remains true if we remove from L_n two loops attached to nonadjacent vertices. Consequently, we improve P. Wittmann’s result on the upper bound of the irregular coloring number c(G) of a 2-regular graph G of size n, by determining that this number is, with a discrepancy of at most one, equal to if all components of G have even orders.     

Rainbow domination on trees

This paper studies a variation of domination in graphs called rainbow domination. For a positive integer k, a k-rainbow dominating function of a graph G is a function f from V(G) to the set of all subsets of {1,2,…,k} such that for any vertex v with f(v)=0? we have ∪_u∈NG(v)f(u)={1,2,…,k}. The 1-rainbow domination is the same as the ordinary domination. The k-rainbow domination problem is to determine the k-rainbow domination number of a graph G, that is the minimum value of ∑_v∈V(G)|f(v)| where f runs over all k-rainbow dominating functions of G. In this paper, we prove that the k-rainbow domination problem is NP-complete even when restricted to chordal graphs or bipartite graphs. We then give a linear-time algorithm for the k-rainbow domination problem on trees. For a given tree T, we also determine the smallest k such that .     

On the list dynamic coloring of graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G is called a dynamic coloring if for every vertex v of degree at least 2, the neighbors of v receive at least two different colors. Assume that is the minimum number k such that for every list assignment of size k to each vertex of G, there is a dynamic coloring of G such that every vertex is colored with a color from its list. In this paper, it is proved that if G is a graph with no component isomorphic to C₅ and Δ(G)≥3, then , where Δ(G) is the maximum degree of G. This generalizes a result due to Lai, Montgomery and Poon which says that under the same assumptions χ₂(G)≤Δ(G)+1. Among other results, we determine , for every natural number n.     

Graham’s pebbling conjecture on product of thorn graphs of complete graphs

The pebbling number of a graph G, f(G), is the least n such that, no matter how n pebbles are placed on the vertices of G, we can move a pebble to any vertex by a sequence of pebbling moves, each move taking two pebbles off one vertex and placing one on an adjacent vertex. Let p₁,p₂,…,p_n be positive integers and G be such a graph, V(G)=n. The thorn graph of the graph G, with parameters p₁,p₂,…,p_n, is obtained by attaching p_i new vertices of degree 1 to the vertex u_i of the graph G, i=1,2,…,n. Graham conjectured that for any connected graphs G and H, f(G×H)≤f(G)f(H). We show that Graham’s conjecture holds true for a thorn graph of the complete graph with every by a graph with the two-pebbling property. As a corollary, Graham’s conjecture holds when G and H are the thorn graphs of the complete graphs with every .     

Bandwidth of the strong product of two connected graphs

The bandwidth B(G) of a graph G is the minimum of the quantity max{|f(x)-f(y)|:xy∈E(G)} taken over all proper numberings f of G. The strong product of two graphs G and H, written as G(S_P)H, is the graph with vertex set V(G)×V(H) and with (u₁,v₁) adjacent to (u₂,v₂) if one of the following holds: (a) u₁ and v₁ are adjacent to u₂ and v₂ in G and H, respectively, (b) u₁ is adjacent to u₂ in G and v₁=v₂, or (c) u₁=u₂ and v₁ is adjacent to v₂ in H. In this paper, we investigate the bandwidth of the strong product of two connected graphs. Let G be a connected graph. We denote the diameter of G by D(G). Let d be a positive integer and let x,y be two vertices of G. Let denote the set of vertices v so that the distance between x and v in G is at most d. We define δ_d(G) as the minimum value of over all vertices x of G. Let denote the set of vertices z such that the distance between x and z in G is at most d-1 and z is adjacent to y. We denote the larger of and by . We define η(G)=1 if G is complete and η(G) as the minimum of over all pair of vertices x,y of G otherwise. Let G and H be two connected graphs. Among other results, we prove that if δ_D(H)(G)?B(G)D(H)+1 and B(H)=⌈(|V(H)|+η(H)-2)/D(H)⌉, then B(G(S_P)H)=B(G)|V(H)|+B(H). Moreover, we show that this result determines the bandwidth of the strong product of some classes of graphs. Furthermore, we study the bandwidth of the strong product of power of paths with complete bipartite graphs.     

Colouring games on outerplanar graphs and trees

Let f be a graph function which assigns to each graph H a non-negative integer f(H)≤|V(H)|. The f-game chromatic number of a graph G is defined through a two-person game. Let X be a set of colours. Two players, Alice and Bob, take turns colouring the vertices of G with colours from X. A partial colouring c of G is legal (with respect to graph function f) if for any subgraph H of G, the sum of the number of colours used in H and the number of uncoloured vertices of H is at least f(H). Both Alice and Bob must colour legally (i.e., the partial colouring produced needs to be legal). The game ends if either all the vertices are coloured or there are uncoloured vertices with no legal colour. In the former case, Alice wins the game. In the latter case, Bob wins the game. The f-game chromatic number of G, χ_g(f,G), is the least number of colours that the colour set X needs to contain so that Alice has a winning strategy. Let be the graph function defined as , for any n≥3 and otherwise. Then is called the acyclic game chromatic number of G. In this paper, we prove that any outerplanar graph G has acyclic game chromatic number at most 7. For any integer k, let ?_k be the graph function defined as ?_k(K₂)=2 and ?_k(P_k)=3 (P_k is the path on k vertices) and ?_k(H)=0 otherwise. This paper proves that if k≥8 then for any tree T, χ_g(?_k,T)≤9. On the other hand, if k≤6, then for any integer n, there is a tree T such that χ_g(?_k,T)≥n.     

Edge covered critical multigraphs

Let G be a multigraph with edge set E(G). An edge coloring C of G is called an edge covered coloring, if each color appears at least once at each vertex v∈V(G). The maximum positive integer k such that G has a k edge covered coloring is called the edge covered chromatic index of G and is denoted by . A graph G is said to be of class if and otherwise of class. A pair of vertices {u,v} is said to be critical if . A graph G is said to be edge covered critical if it is of class and every edge with vertices in V(G) not belonging to E(G) is critical. Some properties about edge covered critical graphs are considered.     

Generalization of transitive fraternal augmentations for directed graphs and its applications

Let be a directed graph. A transitive fraternal augmentation of is a directed graph with the same vertex set, including all the arcs of and such that for any vertices x,y,z,

1.

if and then or (fraternity);

2.

if and then (transitivity).

In this paper, we explore some generalization of the transitive fraternal augmentations for directed graphs and its applications. In particular, we show that the 2-coloring number col₂(G)≤O(∇₁(G)∇₀(G)²), where ∇_k(G) (k≥0) denotes the greatest reduced average density with depth k of a graph G; we give a constructive proof that ∇_k(G) bounds the distance (k+1)-coloring number col_k+1(G) with a function f(∇_k(G)). On the other hand, ∇_k(G)≤(col_2k+1(G))^2k+1. We also show that an inductive generalization of transitive fraternal augmentations can be used to study nonrepetitive colorings of graphs.     

Equitable colorings of Kronecker products of graphs

For a positive integer k, a graph G is equitably k-colorable if there is a mapping f:V(G)→{1,2,…,k} such that f(x)≠f(y) whenever xy∈E(G) and ||f⁻¹(i)|−|f⁻¹(j)||≤1 for 1≤i<j≤k. The equitable chromatic number of a graph G, denoted by χ₌(G), is the minimum k such that G is equitably k-colorable. The equitable chromatic threshold of a graph G, denoted by , is the minimum t such that G is equitably k-colorable for k≥t. The current paper studies equitable chromatic numbers of Kronecker products of graphs. In particular, we give exact values or upper bounds on χ₌(G×H) and when G and H are complete graphs, bipartite graphs, paths or cycles.     

Signed star domatic number of a graph

Let G be a simple graph without isolated vertices with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)?{−1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function on G if ∑_e∈E(v)f(e)≥1 for every vertex v of G, where E(v)={uv∈E(G)∣u∈N(v)}. A set {f₁,f₂,…,f_d} of signed star dominating functions on G with the property that for each e∈E(G), is called a signed star dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed star dominating family on G is the signed star domatic number of G, denoted by d_SS(G).In this paper we study the properties of the signed star domatic number d_SS(G). In particular, we determine the signed domatic number of some classes of graphs.     

On the Roman domination number of a graph

A Roman dominating function of a graph G is a labeling f:V(G)?{0,1,2} such that every vertex with label 0 has a neighbor with label 2. The Roman domination number γ_R(G) of G is the minimum of ∑_v∈V(G)f(v) over such functions. A Roman dominating function of G of weight γ_R(G) is called a γ_R(G)-function. A Roman dominating function f:V?{0,1,2} can be represented by the ordered partition (V₀,V₁,V₂) of V, where V_i={v∈V∣f(v)=i}. Cockayne et al. [E.J. Cockayne, P.A. Dreyer, S.M. Hedetniemi, S.T. Hedetniemi, On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22] posed the following question: What can we say about the minimum and maximum values of |V₀|,|V₁|,|V₂| for a γ_R-function f=(V₀,V₁,V₂) of a graph G? In this paper we first show that for any connected graph G of order n≥3, , where γ(G) is the domination number of G. Also we prove that for any γ_R-function f=(V₀,V₁,V₂) of a connected graph G of order n≥3, , and .     

Small alliances in a weighted graph

We extend the notion of a defensive alliance to weighted graphs. Let (G,w) be a weighted graph, where G is a graph and w be a function from V(G) to the set of positive real numbers. A non-empty set of vertices S in G is said to be a weighted defensive alliance if ∑_{x∈NG(v)∩S}w(x)+w(v)≥∑_{x∈NG(v)−S}w(x) holds for every vertex v in S. Fricke et al. (2003) [3] have proved that every graph of order n has a defensive alliance of order at most . In this note, we generalize this result to weighted defensive alliances. Let G be a graph of order n. Then we prove that for any weight function w on V(G), (G,w) has a defensive weighted alliance of order at most . We also extend the notion of strong defensive alliance to weighted graphs and generalize a result in Fricke et al. (2003) [3].     

Adaptable choosability of planar graphs with sparse short cycles

Given a (possibly improper) edge colouring F of a graph G, a vertex colouring of G is adapted toF if no colour appears at the same time on an edge and on its two endpoints. A graph G is called (for some positive integer k) if for any list assignment L to the vertices of G, with |L(v)|≥k for all v, and any edge colouring F of G, G admits a colouring c adapted to F where c(v)∈L(v) for all v. This paper proves that a planar graph G is adaptably 3-choosable if any two triangles in G have distance at least 2 and no triangle is adjacent to a 4-cycle.     

Brooks-type theorems for choosability with separation

We consider the following type of problems. Given a graph G = (V, E) and lists L(v) of allowed colors for its vertices v ∈ V such that |L(v)| = p for all v ∈ V and |L(u) ∩ L(v)| ≤ c for all uv ∈ E, is it possible to find a “list coloring,” i.e., a color f(v) ∈ L(v) for each v ∈ V, so that f(u) ≠ f(v) for all uv ∈ E? We prove that every of maximum degree Δ admits a list coloring for every such list assignment, provided p ≥ . Apart from a multiplicative constant, the result is tight, as lists of length may be necessary. Moreover, for G = K_n (the complete graph on n vertices) and c = 1 (i.e., almost disjoint lists), the smallest value of p is shown to have asymptotics (1 + o(1)) . For planar graphs and c = 1, lists of length 4 suffice. ˜© 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 27: 43–49, 1998