One‐Electron Oxidation of [M(PtBu3)2] (M=Pd,Pt): Isolation of Monomeric [Pd(PtBu3)2]+ and Redox‐Promoted C−H Bond Cyclometalation

Oxidation of zero‐valent phosphine complexes [M(P^tBu₃)₂] (M=Pd, Pt) has been investigated in 1,2‐difluorobenzene solution using cyclic voltammetry and subsequently using the ferrocenium cation as a chemical redox agent. In the case of palladium, a mononuclear paramagnetic Pd^I derivative was readily isolated from solution and fully characterized (EPR, X‐ray crystallography). While in situ electrochemical measurements are consistent with initial one‐electron oxidation, the heavier congener undergoes C?H bond cyclometalation and ultimately affords the 14 valence‐electron Pt^II complex [Pt(κ²_PC‐P^tBu₂CMe₂CH₂)(P^tBu₃)]⁺ with concomitant formation of [Pt(P^tBu₃)₂H]⁺.     

One‐Electron Oxidation of [M(PtBu3)2] (M=Pd,Pt): Isolation of Monomeric [Pd(PtBu3)2]+ and Redox‐Promoted C−H Bond Cyclometalation

Oxidation of zero‐valent phosphine complexes [M(P^tBu₃)₂] (M=Pd, Pt) has been investigated in 1,2‐difluorobenzene solution using cyclic voltammetry and subsequently using the ferrocenium cation as a chemical redox agent. In the case of palladium, a mononuclear paramagnetic Pd^I derivative was readily isolated from solution and fully characterized (EPR, X‐ray crystallography). While in situ electrochemical measurements are consistent with initial one‐electron oxidation, the heavier congener undergoes C−H bond cyclometalation and ultimately affords the 14 valence‐electron Pt^II complex [Pt(κ²_PC‐P^tBu₂CMe₂CH₂)(P^tBu₃)]⁺ with concomitant formation of [Pt(P^tBu₃)₂H]⁺.     

Neue viergliedrige GaE‐ und InE‐Ringverbindungen: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Et2InE(SiMe3)2]2 und [GaCl(PtBu2Me)E(SiMe3)]2 (E = P,As)

New GaE and InE Four Membered Ring Compounds: Syntheses and Crystal Structures of [Et₂InE(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and [GaCl(P t Bu₂Me)E(SiMe₃)]₂ (E = P, As) Et₃In · PR₃ (R = Et, iPr) reacts with H₂ESiMe₃ under liberation of C₂H₆ and EH₃ to form the cyclic compounds [Et₂InE(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 1 a : E = P, 1 b : E = As). 1 consists of a planar four membered In₂E₂ ring in which the indium and phosphorus or arsenic atoms are four coordinated. In contrast, the phosphorus/arsenic atoms in [GaCl(PtBu₂Me)E(SiMe₃)]₂ ( 2 a : E = P, 2 b : E = As) only have the coordination number three. 2 results from the reaction of GaCl₃ · PtBu₂Me with As(SiMe₃)₃ or Li₂PSiMe₃ respectively, and displays a folded four membered Ga₂E₂ ring as central structural motif. 1 and 2 have been characterised by single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis as well as ¹H and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy.     

Oligophosphanid‐Anionen: Synthesen und Molekülstrukturen von [K2(PMDETA)2(P4Ph4)], [K2(PMDETA)(P4tBu4)]2 und [K(PMDETA)(THF){cyclo‐(P5tBu4)}] (PMDETA = NMe(CH2CH2NMe2)2)

Oligophosphanide Anions: Syntheses and Molecular Structures of [K₂(PMDETA)₂(P₄Ph₄)], [K₂(PMDETA)(P₄tBu₄)]₂ and [K(PMDETA)(THF){cyclo‐(P₅tBu₄)}] (PMDETA = NMe(CH₂CH₂NMe₂)₂) The alkali metal tetraphosphanediides [K₂(PMDETA)₂(P₄Ph₄)] ( 1 ) and [K₂(PMDETA)(P₄tBu₄)]₂ ( 2 ) [PMDETA = NMe(CH₂CH₂NMe₂)₂] were synthesized via reaction of PhPCl₂ or tBuPCl₂ with 2.5 equiv. potassium and characterized by X‐ray crystallography and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. As in other ion contact complexes of the type M₂(P₄R₄) (M = alkali metal) the solid‐state structures are retained in solution. While 1 could be prepared in comparatively good yield (54 %), 2 was only isolated in very modest yield and with low purity as [K(PMDETA)(THF){cyclo‐(P₅tBu₄)}] ( 3 ) was formed as a side product in this case. 3 was also characterized by X‐ray crystallography and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy.     

Bildung und Struktur des [{cyclo‐P4(PtBu2)4}{Ni(CO)2}2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXVI. Formation and Structure of [{ cyclo ‐P₄(P^tBu₂)₄}{Ni(CO)₂}₂] [{cyclo‐P₄(P^tBu₂)₄}{Ni(CO)₂}₂] is formed by reaction of the cyclotetraphosphane P₄(P^tBu₂)₄ with [Ni(CO)₄]. Each Ni(CO)₂ unit is coordinated by two adjacent ^tBu₂P groups forming two five‐membered P₄Ni rings above and below the planar cyclotetraphosphane ring, respectively. The compound crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 (No. 2) with a = 893.29(5), b = 1140.75(7), c = 1235.52(8) pm, α = 109.179(7), β = 100.066(7), γ = 97.595(7)° and Z = 1.     

Reactions of tBu2P–PLi–PtBu2 with [(Et3P)2MCl2] (M = Ni,Pd, Pt). Synthesis and Properties of [(1,2‐η‐tBu2P=P–PtBu2)M(PEt3)Cl] (M=Ni,Pd)

^tBu₂P–PLi–P^tBu₂·2THF reacts with [cis‐(Et₃P)₂MCl₂] (M = Ni, Pd) yielding [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu₂)Ni(PEt₃)Cl] and [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu2)Pd(PEt₃)Cl], respectively. ^tBu₂P– PLi–P^tBu₂ undergoes an oxidation process and the ^tBu₂P–P–P^tBu₂ ligand adopts in the products the structure of a side‐on bonded 1,1‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐(di‐tert‐butylphosphino)diphosphenium cation with a short P–P bond. Surprisingly, the reaction of ^tBu₂P–PLi–P^tBu₂·2THF with [cis‐(Et₃P)₂PtCl₂] does not yield [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu₂)Pt(PEt₃)Cl].     

Synthese und Strukturen der selenolatoverbrückten Quecksilbercluster [Hg6(SePh)12(PtBu3)2] und (HPtBu3)2[Hg6(SePh)14]

Synthesis and Structures of the Selenolato-Bridged Mercury Clusters [Hg₆(SePh)₁₂(P t Bu₃)₂] and (HP t Bu₃)₂[Hg₆(SePh)₁₄] The reaction of HgCl₂ with PtBu₃ and PhSeSiMe₃ yields [Hg₆(SePh)₁₂(PtBu₃)₂] ( 1 ) and (HPtBu₃)₂[Hg₆(SePh)₁₄] ( 2 ). X-ray structural analysis of the compounds shows them to have similar Hg–Se cages with distorted tetrahedral coordination around mercury. The cages are built up from edge- and vertex-sharing distorted tetrahedra.     

Heterodinukleare Komplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)4(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)3(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [CoRh(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)]

Heterobinuclear Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], and [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] [Ru₃Rh(CO)₇(μ₃‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂(^tBu₂PH)(μ‐Cl)₂] ( 2 ) yields by cluster degradation under CO pressure as main product the heterobinuclear complex [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 4 ). The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pcab with a = 15.6802(15), b = 28.953(3), c = 11.8419(19) Å and V = 5376.2(11) ų. The reaction of 4 with dppm (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) in THF at room temperature affords in good yields [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 7 ). 7 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 9.7503(19), b = 13.399(3), c = 15.823(3) Å and V = 1854.6 ų. Moreover single crystals of [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 9 ) could be obtained and the single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis revealed that 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/a with a = 11.611(2), b = 13.333(2), c = 18.186(3) Å and V = 2693.0(8) ų.     

Reaktionen von tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2 mit (Et3P)2NiCl2 und [{η2‐C2H4}Ni(PEt3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXIII. Reactions of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ with (Et₃P)₂NiCl₂ and [{η²‐C₂H₄}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ ( 1 ) forms with (Et₃P)₂NiCl₂ ( 2 ) and Na(Nph) the [μ‐(1,3 : 2,3‐η‐^tBu₂P₄^tBu₂){Ni(PEt₃)Cl}₂] ( 3 ) as main product. Using Na/Hg instead as reducing agent the Ni⁰ compounds [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ( 4 ), [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P=P–P^tBu₂}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ( 5 ) and [(Et₃P)Ni(μ‐P^tBu₂)]₂ ( 6 ) with four‐membered Ni₂P₂ ring result. [{η²‐C₂H₄}Ni(PEt₃)₂] yields with 1 also 4 . The compounds were characterized by ¹H and ³¹P{¹H} NMR investigations and 3 also by a single crystal X‐ray analysis. It crystallizes triclinic in the space group P 1 with a = 1129.4(2), b = 1256.8(3), c = 1569.5(3) pm, α = 72.44(3)°, β = 70.52(3)° and γ = 74.20(3)°.     

Donor‐unsupported Phosphanylmethanides Li[CH2PR2] (R = tBu,Ph) – Crystal Structure of Li[CH2PtBu2] Solved by XRPD and DFT‐D Calculations

The solvent‐free methyllithium derivatives Li[CH₂PR₂] (R = tBu, Ph) were prepared via the reaction of CH₃PR₂ with Li[tBu]. It should be noted that the deprotonation of CH₃PtBu₂ with Li[tBu] occurred at 60 °C, whereas Li[CH₂PPh₂] was already formed from CH₃PPh₂ with Li[tBu] at ambient temperature. The structure determination of di‐tert‐butylphosphanylmethyllithium was performed by high resolution X‐ray powder diffraction analysis at different temperatures. This led to two possible structure solutions with similar quality criteria (space groups Iba2 and I2/a). Therefore CASTEP DFT‐D calculations were applied to verify the correct crystal structure. The solid‐state structure of di‐tert‐butylphosphanylmethyllithium consists of alternating edge‐sharing six‐ and four‐membered rings, which form a polymeric, infinite double‐chain along the crystallographic c axis in the monoclinic space group I2/a. Two Li[CH₂PtBu₂] units connected via an inversion center form a six‐membered Li₂C₂P₂ ring in the chair conformation. The nearly flat four‐membered Li₂C₂ ring, is oriented perpendicularly to the twofold axis.     

Synthesis and Molecular Structure of trans‐[IrCl(NO)(PtBu2H)2]BF4

The synthesis and structural characterization of trans‐[IrCl(NO)(PtBu₂H)₂]BF₄ ( 1 ) is reported. The title compound was prepared in good yield in the reaction of in situ‐prepared trans‐[IrCl(coe)(PtBu₂H)₂] (coe = cis‐cyclooctene) with an appropriate amount of nitrosonium tetrafluoridoborate in dichloromethane at room temperature. Single crystals of 1 were grown from dichloromethane/diethyl ether and were analyzed by X‐ray crystallography.     

Komplexchemie P‐reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XXV. Bildung und Struktur des [{cyclo‐P3(PtBu2)3}{Ni(CO)2}{Ni(CO)3}]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXV. Formation and Structure of [{ cyclo ‐P₃(P^tBu₂)₃}{Ni(CO)₂}{Ni(CO)₃}] ^tBu₂P–P=P(R)^tBu₂ (R = Br, Me) reacts with [Ni(CO)₄] yielding [{cyclo‐P₃(P^tBu₂)₃}{Ni(CO)₂}{Ni(CO)₃}]. The two cis‐^tBu₂P substituents of the cyclotriphosphane, which results from the trimerization of the phosphinophosphinidene ^tBu₂P–P, are coordinating to a Ni(CO)₂ unit forming a five‐membered P₄Ni chelate ring. The trans‐^tBu₂P group is linked to a Ni(CO)₃ unit. The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbca (No. 61) with a = 933.30(5), b = 2353.2(1) and c = 3474.7(3) pm.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dieisenkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Fe2(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [Fe2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diiron Complexes: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts spontaneously with dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) to give [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 c ). By thermolysis or photolysis, 2 c loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and yields the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ). 3 exhibits a Fe–Fe double bond which could be confirmed by the addition of methylene to the corresponding dimetallacyclopropane [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). The reaction of 1 with dppe (Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh₂) affords [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppe)] ( 5 ). In contrast to the thermolysis of 2 c , yielding 3 , the heating of 5 in toluene leads rapidly to complete decomposition. The reaction of 1 with PPh₃ yields [Fe₂(CO)₆(H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(PPh₃)] ( 6 a ), while with ^tBu₂PH the compound [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 6 b ) is formed. The thermolysis of 6 b affords [Fe₂(CO)₅(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂] and the degradation products [Fe(CO)₃(^tBu₂PH)₂] and [Fe(CO)₄(^tBu₂PH)]. The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 6 b were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

[Fe2(μsb‐CO)(CO)3(NO)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und Koordinationsisomerie

[Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)]: Synthesis, X‐ray Crystal Structure and Isomerization Na[Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts with [NO][BF₄] at —60 °C in THF to the nitrosyl complex [Fe₂(CO)₆(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 2 ). The subsequent reaction of 2 with phosphanes (L) under mild conditions affords the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₅(NO)L(μ‐P^tBu₂)], L = PPh₃, ( 3a ); η‐dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), ( 3b ). In this case the phosphane substitutes one carbonyl ligand at the iron tetracarbonyl fragment in 2 , which was confirmed by the X‐ray crystal structure analysis of 3a . In solution 3b loses one CO ligand very easily to give dppm as bridging ligand on the Fe‐Fe bond. The thus formed compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ) occurs in solution in different solvents and over a wide temperature range as a mixture of the two isomers [Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4a ) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4b ). 4a was unambiguously characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis while 4b was confirmed both by NMR investigations in solution as well as by means of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the spontaneous reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) with NO at —60 °C in toluene yields a complicated mixture of products containing [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 6 ) as main product beside the isomers 4a and 4b occuring in very low yields.     

Synthesis and Molecular Structure of trans‐[RhCl(NO)(PtBu2H)2]BF4

The synthesis and structural characterization of trans‐[RhCl(NO)(PtBu₂H)₂]BF₄ ( 2 ) is reported. The title compound could easily be prepared in good yields by a kind of “bridge‐splitting” reaction of [{Rh(μ‐Cl)(PtBu₂H)₂}₂] ( 1 ) with an appropriate amount of nitrosonium tetrafluoridoborate in dichloromethane at room temperature. Single crystals of 2 were grown from dichloromethane/diethyl ether and were analyzed by X‐ray crystallography.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)n(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (n = 4; 5) und [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)_n(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (n = 4; 5) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] The reaction of [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 2 ) with dppm yields the dinuclear species [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). Under thermal or photolytic conditions 3 loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and affords the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). 4 is also obtainable by an one‐pot synthesis from [Ru₃(CO)₁₂], an excess of ^tBu₂PH and stoichiometric amounts of dppm via the formation of [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)₂] ( 1 ). 4 exhibits a Ru–Ru double bond which could be confirmed by addition of methylene to the dimetallacyclopropane [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ). The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 5 were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

Neue Phosphido-verbrückte Mehrkernkomplexe des Ag,Cd und Zn Die Kristallstrukturen von [Ag4(PPh2)4(PMe3)4], [Ag6(PPh2)6(PtBu3)2] und [M4Cl4(PPh2)4(PnPr3)2] (M = Zn,Cd)

New Phosphido-bridged Multinuclear Complexes of Ag, Cd and Zn. The Crystal Structures of [Ag₄(PPh₂)₄(PMe₃)₄], [Ag₆(PPh₂)₆(P^tBu₃)₂] and [M₄Cl₄(PPh₂)₄(PⁿPr₃)₂] (M = Zn, Cd) AgCl reacts with Ph₂PSiMe₃ in the presence of a tertiary Phosphine PMe₃ or P^tBu₃ to form the multinuclear complexes [Ag₄(PPh₂)₄(PMe₃)₄] ( 1 ) and [Ag₆(PPh₂)₆(P^tBu₃)₂] ( 2 ). In analogy to that MCl₂ reacts with Ph₂PSiMe₃ in the presence of PⁿPr₃ to form the two multinuclear complexes [M₄Cl₄(PPh₂)₄(PⁿPr₃)₂] (M = Zn ( 3 ), Cd ( 4 )). The structures were characterized by X-ray single crystal structure analysis ( 1 : space group Pna2₁ (Nr. 33), Z = 4, a = 1 313.8(11) pm, b = 1 511.1(6) pm, c = 4 126.0(18) pm, 2 : space group P–1 (Nr. 2), Z = 2, a = 1 559.0(4) pm, b = 1 885.9(7) pm, c = 2 112.4(8) pm, α = 104.93(3)°, β = 94.48(3)°, γ = 104.41(3)°; 3 : space group C2/c (Nr. 15), Z = 4, a = 2 228.6(6) pm, b = 1 847.6(6) pm, c = 1 827.3(6) pm, β = 110.86(2); 4 : space group C2/c (Nr. 15), Z = 4, a = 1 894.2(9) pm, b = 1 867.9(7) pm, c = 2 264.8(6) pm, β = 111.77(3)°). 3 and 4 may be considered as intermediates on the route towards polymeric [M(PPh₂)₂]_n (M = Zn, Cd).     

Synthesis and Thermolysis of the Homoleptic Iron(II) Complex [Fe{cyclo‐(P5tBu4)}2]

Na[cyclo‐(P₅tBu₄)] ( 1 ) reacts with [FeBr₂(CO)₄] (2:1) to give the first homoleptic iron(II) complex [Fe{cyclo‐(P₅tBu₄)}₂] ( 2 ) containing two tridentate cyclo‐(P₅tBu₄)^– ligands. Thermolysis of 2 up to 500 °C produces a new phosphorus‐rich iron phosphide, calculated as FeP₆ according to the mass change.     

Reaktionen des [η2-{P–PtBu2}Pt(PPh3)2] und [η2-{P–PtBu2}Pt(dppe)] mit Metallcarbonylen. Bildung von [η2-{(CO)5M · PPtBu2}Pt(PPh3)2] (M = Cr,W) und [η2-{(CO)5Cr · PPtBu2}Pt(dppe)]

Coordination Chemistry of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVI [1] Reactions of [g²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [g²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] with Metal Carbonyls. Formation of [g²-{(CO)₅M · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] (M = Cr, W) and [g²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] [η²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 4 reacts with M(CO)₅ · THF (M = Cr, W) by adding the M(CO)₅ group to the phosphinophosphinidene ligand yielding [η²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 1 , or [η²-{(CO)₅W · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 2 , respectively. Similarly, [η²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] 5 yields [η²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] 3 . Compounds 1 , 2 and 3 are characterized by their ¹H- and ³¹P-NMR spectra, for 2 and 3 also crystal structure determinations were performed. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n (no. 14) with a = 1422.7(1) pm, b = 1509.3(1) pm, c = 2262.4(2) pm, β = 103.669(9)°. 3 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (no. 2) with a = 1064.55(9) pm, b = 1149.9(1) pm, c = 1693.2(1) pm, α = 88.020(8)°, β = 72.524(7)°, γ = 85.850(8)°.     

Acyl‐Phosphide Anions via an Intermediate with Carbene Character: Reactions of K[PtBu2] and CO

The analogy of the reactivity of group 1 phosphides to that of FLPs is further demonstrated by reactions with CO, affording a new synthetic route to acyl‐phosphide anions. The reaction of [K(18‐crown‐6)][PtBu₂] ( 1 ) with CO affords [(18‐crown‐6)K?THF₂][Z‐tBuP=C(tBu)O] ( 2?THF₂ ) as the major product, and the minor product [K₆(18‐crown‐6)][(tBu₂PCO)₂]₃ ( 3 ). Species 2 reacts with either BPh₃ or additional CO to give [K(18‐crown‐6)][(Ph₃B)tBuPC(tBu)O] ( 4 ) and [K(18‐crown‐6)][(OCtBu)₂P] ( 5 ), respectively. The acyl‐phosphide anion 2 is thought to be formed by a photochemically induced radical process involving a transient species with triplet carbene character, prompting 1,2‐tert‐butyl group migration. A similar process is proposed for the subsequent reaction of 2 with CO to give 5 .