Preparation, properties, and reactivity of carbonylrhodium(I) complexes of di(2-pyrazolylaryl)amido-pincer ligands

A series of six carbonylrhodium(I) complexes of three new and three previously reported di(2-3R-pyrazolyl)-p-Z/X-aryl)amido pincer ligands, (^RZX)Rh(CO), (R is the substituent at the 3-pyrazolyl position proximal to the metal; Z and X are the aryl substituents para- to the arylamido nitrogen) were prepared. The metal complexes were studied to assess how their properties and reactivities can be tuned by varying the groups along the ligand periphery and how they compared to other known carbonylrhodium(I) pincer derivatives. This study was facilitated by the discovery of a new CuI-catalyzed coupling reaction between 2-(pyrazolyl)-4-X-anilines (X = Me or CF₃) and 2-bromoaryl-1H-pyrazoles that allow the fabrication of pincer ligands with two different aryl arms. The NNN-pincer scaffolds provide an electron-rich environment for the carbonylrhodium(I) fragment as indicated by carbonyl stretching frequencies that occur in the range of 1948-1968 cm⁻¹. As such, the oxidative addition (OA) reactions with iodomethane proceed instantaneously to form trans-(NNN-pincer)Rh(Me)(CO)(I) in room temperature acetone solution. The OA reactions with iodoethane proceeded at a convenient rate in acetone near 45 °C which allowed detailed kinetic studies. The relative order of reactivity was found to be (CF₃CF₃)Rh(CO) < (^iPrMeMe)Rh(CO) < (^MeMeMe)Rh(CO) ∼ (CF₃Me)Rh(CO) < (MeH)Rh(CO) < (MeMe)Rh(CO) with the second order rate constant of the most reactive in the series, k₂ = 8 × 10⁻³ M⁻¹ s⁻¹, being about three orders of magnitude greater than those reported for [Rh(CO)₂I₂]⁻ or CpRh(CO)(PPh₃). After oxidative addition, the resultant rhodium(III) complexes were found to be unstable. Although a few trans-(^RMeMe)Rh(E = Me, Et, or I)(CO)(I) could be isolated in pure form, all were found to slowly decompose in solution to give different products depending on the 3R-pyrazolyl substituents. Those with unsubstituted pyrazolyls (R = H) decompose with CO dissociation to give insoluble dimeric [(^RMeMe)Rh(E)(μ-I)]₂ while those with 3-alkylpyrazolyls (R = Me, ⁱPr) decompose to give soluble, but unidentified products.     

Heptanuclear high-spin complex compounds based on S-donors

The precursors [Fe(III)(^SYL)Cl] (^SYLH₂) = N,N′-bis(1-hydroxy-Y-2-benzyliden)-1,6-diamino-3-thiohexane, (Y = H, 3EtO, 5Me) are high-spin (S = 5/2) complexes. The precursors are combined with [Fe(II)(CN)₆]⁴⁻ and [Co(III)(CN)₆]³⁻ to yield star-shaped heptanuclear clusters, [Fe(II)(CN–Fe(III)^SYL)₆]Cl₂ and [Co(III)(CN–Fe(III)^SYL)₆]Cl₃. The star-shaped compounds are high-spin (HS) systems at room temperature. On cooling to 20 K some of the iron(III) centers perform some HS–HS transition.     

Cationic iridium complexes of the Xantphos ligand. Flexible coordination modes and the isolation of the hydride insertion product with an alkene

Reaction of the Ir(I)-Xantphos complex [Ir(κ²-Xantphos)(COD)][BAr^F₄] (Xantphos = 4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene, Ar^F = C₆H₃(CF₃)₂) with H₂ in acetone or CH₂Cl₂/MeCN affords the Ir(III)-hydrido complexes [Ir(κ³-Xantphos)(H)₂(L)][BAr^F₄], L = acetone or MeCN, whereas in non-coordinating CH₂Cl₂ solvent dimeric [Ir(κ³-Xantphos)(H)(μ-H)]₂[BAr^F₄]₂ is formed. A common intermediate in these reactions that invokes a (σ, η²-C₈H₁₃) ligand is reported. Addition of excess tert-butylethene (tbe) to [Ir(κ³-Xantphos)(H)₂(MeCN)][BAr^F₄] results in insertion of a hydride into the alkene to form [Ir(κ³-Xantphos)(MeCN)(CH₂CH₂C(CH₃)₃)(H)][BAr^F₄], an Ir(III) alkyl-hydrido-Xantphos complex. This reaction is reversible, and heating (80 °C) results in the reformation of [Ir(κ³-Xantphos)(H)₂(MeCN)][BAr^F₄] and tbe. These complexes have been characterised by NMR spectroscopy, ESI-MS and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. They show variable coordination modes of the Xantphos ligand: cis-κ²-P,P, fac-κ³-P,O,P and mer-κ³-P,O,P with the later coordination mode like that found in related PNP-pincer complexes.     

DFT study of group 8 catalysts for the hydrophenylation of ethylene: Influence of ancillary ligands and metal identity

Computational methods are used to investigate catalytic hydrophenylation of ethylene using complexes of the type [(Y)M(L)(CH₃)(NCMe)]ⁿ⁺ [Y = Mp, n = 1; Y = Tp, n = 0; M = Ru or Os; L = PMe₃, PF₃, or CO; Mp = tris(pyrazolyl)methane; Tp = hydrido-tris(pyrazolyl)borate]. The conversion of ethylene and benzene to ethylbenzene with [(Y)M(L)(Ph)]ⁿ⁺ as catalyst involves four steps: (1) ethylene coordination, (2) ethylene insertion into the M–Ph bond, (3) benzene coordination, and (4) benzene C–H activation. DFT calculations form the basis to compare stoichiometric benzene C–H activation by [(Y)M(L)(CH₃)(NCMe)]ⁿ⁺ complexes to yield methane and [(Y)M(L)(Ph)(NCMe)]ⁿ⁺. In addition, starting from the 16-electron species [(Y)M(L)(Ph)]ⁿ⁺, potential energy surfaces for the formation of ethylbenzene are calculated to reveal the impact of modifications to the scorpionate ligand (Mp or Tp), co-ligand (L) and metal center (M).     

New thioether–dithiolate complexes of Cp1Ir and some reactivity features

The reaction of [Cp1IrCl₂]₂ (Cp* = η⁵ − C₅Me₅) with the tridentate 3-thiapentane-1,5-dithiolate ligand, S(CH₂CH₂S⁻)₂ (tpdt), led to the formation of [Cp1Ir(η³ − tpdt)] (1) in 81% isolated yield. Subsequent reactions of 1 with [Cp1IrCl₂]₂ in 2:1 and 1:1 molar equiv ratios resulted in the formation of [Cp1Ir(μ − η²:η³ − tpdt)Cp1IrCl][PF₆] (2) and [Cp1Irμ − η²:η³ − tpdt)Cp1IrCl][Cp1IrCl₃] (3) in 86 and 79% yields, respectively, based on 1, whereas the reactions of 1 with [(COD)IrCl]₂ (COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) in 2:1 and 1:1 molar equiv ratios resulted in the formation of the homo-bimetallic derivatives Cp1Ir(μ − η¹:η³ − tpdt)(COD)IrCl (4) (92% yield) and [Cp1Ir(μ − η²:η³ − tpdt)(COD)Ir] [(COD)IrCl₂] (5) (82% yield). Reactions between 1 and [(COD)RhCl]₂, yielded the hetero-bimetallic derivatives Cp1Ir(μ − η¹:η³ − tpdt)(COD)RhCl (6) and [Cp1Ir(μ − η²:η³ − tpdt)(COD)Rh][(COD)RhCl₂] (7), in 92 and 93% yields, respectively. The reaction of 1 with methyl iodide gave mono-methylated derivative [Cp1Ir(η³-C₄H₈S₃Me)]I (8) (93% yield). All these compounds have been comprehensively characterized.     

Photocatalytic properties of new cyclopentadienyl and indenyl rhodium(I) carbonyl complexes with water-soluble 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane (PTA) and tris(2-cyanoethyl)phosphine

Reactions of [(η⁵-R)Rh(CO)₂] (R = cp, ind) with water-soluble phosphines (L = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane and tris(2-cyanoethyl)phosphine) give the new rhodium(I) complexes of the types [Rh(η⁵-cp)(CO)(PTA)] (1), [Rh(η⁵-cp)(CO)(P(CH₂CH₂CN)₃)] (2), [Rh(η⁵-ind)(CO)(PTA)] (3) and [Rh(η⁵-ind)(CO)(P(CH₂CH₂CN)₃)] (4) in isolated yields of 52-75%. All these compounds have been fully characterized by IR, ¹H, ³¹P{¹H} and ¹³C{¹H} NMR, FAB-MS spectroscopies and elemental analyses. Reactivity for the substitution of phosphine is greater for [(η⁵-ind)Rh(CO)(L)] comparing to [(η⁵-cp)Rh(CO)(L)] because of a flexibility of the indenyl ligand to undergo facile η⁵-η³ coordinative isomerizations. The obtained complexes are active catalyst precursors for the dehydrogenation of propan-2-ol, octane and cyclooctane under photoassisted conditions without any organic hydrogen transfer acceptors, giving TOFs of 26-56 using 3 as precatalyst.     

Synthesis and characterization of stable thiazolylazo anion radical complexes of ruthenium(II)

Two stable thiazolylazo anion radical complexes of ruthenium(II), [Ru(L1^•−)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (1) and [Ru(L2^•−)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (2) (where L1 = 2′-Thiazolylazo-2-imidazole and L2 = 4-(2′-Thiazolylazo)-1-n-hexadecyloxy-naphthalene), have been synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques. The radical nature of the complexes has been confirmed from their room temperature magnetic moments and X-band ESR spectra. The radical complexes display a moderately intense (ε ~ 10⁴ M⁻¹ cm⁻¹) and relatively broad band in 430–460 nm region. In the microcrystalline state, complexes (1) and (2) display strong ESR signals at g = 1.951 and g = 1.988, respectively. In CH₂Cl₂ solution, complexes (1) and (2) show a quasireversible one-electron response near −0.64 and −0.59 V, respectively, versus Ag/AgCl due to the radical redox couple [Ru^II(L)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂]/[Ru^II (L^•−)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂].     

New thioether–dithiolate complexes of Cp1Ir and some reactivity features

The reaction of [Cp1IrCl₂]₂ (Cp* = η⁵ ? C₅Me₅) with the tridentate 3-thiapentane-1,5-dithiolate ligand, S(CH₂CH₂S^?)₂ (tpdt), led to the formation of [Cp1Ir(η³ ? tpdt)] (1) in 81% isolated yield. Subsequent reactions of 1 with [Cp1IrCl₂]₂ in 2:1 and 1:1 molar equiv ratios resulted in the formation of [Cp1Ir(μ ? η²:η³ ? tpdt)Cp1IrCl][PF₆] (2) and [Cp1Irμ ? η²:η³ ? tpdt)Cp1IrCl][Cp1IrCl₃] (3) in 86 and 79% yields, respectively, based on 1, whereas the reactions of 1 with [(COD)IrCl]₂ (COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) in 2:1 and 1:1 molar equiv ratios resulted in the formation of the homo-bimetallic derivatives Cp1Ir(μ ? η¹:η³ ? tpdt)(COD)IrCl (4) (92% yield) and [Cp1Ir(μ ? η²:η³ ? tpdt)(COD)Ir] [(COD)IrCl₂] (5) (82% yield). Reactions between 1 and [(COD)RhCl]₂, yielded the hetero-bimetallic derivatives Cp1Ir(μ ? η¹:η³ ? tpdt)(COD)RhCl (6) and [Cp1Ir(μ ? η²:η³ ? tpdt)(COD)Rh][(COD)RhCl₂] (7), in 92 and 93% yields, respectively. The reaction of 1 with methyl iodide gave mono-methylated derivative [Cp1Ir(η³-C₄H₈S₃Me)]I (8) (93% yield). All these compounds have been comprehensively characterized.     

Formation and isomerization of cis,cis-Ir(H)2(--Ph)(CO)(PPh3)2 and cis,cis-Ir(H)(--Ph)2(CO)(PPh3)2 in oxidative addition of hydrogen and phenylacetylene to trans-Ir(CO)(--Ph)(PPh3)2

Oxidative addition of H–R (H--Ph and H₂) to trans-Ir(--Ph)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (2) gives the initial products, cis, cis-Ir(H)(--Ph)₂(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (3a) and cis, cis-Ir(H)₂(--Ph)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (3b), respectively. Both cis-bis(PPh₃) complexes, 3a and 3b undergo isomerization to give the trans-bis(PPh₃) complexes, trans, trans-Ir(H)(--Ph)₂(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (4a) and cis, trans-Ir(H)₂(--Ph)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (4b). The isomerization, 3b→4b is first order with respect to 3b with k₁=6.37×10⁻⁴ s⁻¹ at 25°C under N₂ in CDCl₃. The reaction rate (k₁) seems independent of the concentration of H₂. A large negative entropy of activation (ΔS^≠=−24.9±5.7 cal deg⁻¹ mol⁻¹) and a relatively small enthalpy of activation (ΔH^≠=14.5±3.3 kcal mol⁻¹) were obtained in the temperature range 15∼35°C for the isomerization, 3b→4b under 1 atm of H₂.     

Organo-aluminum,zinc and magnesium derivatives of the imidotris(amido)phosphate Me3SiNP(NHtBu)3

Reactions of (^tBuHN)₃PNSiMe₃ (1) with the alkyl-metal reagents dimethylzinc, trimethylaluminum and di-n-butylmagnesium yield the monodeprotonated complexes [MeZn{(N^tBu)(NSiMe₃)P(NH^tBu)₂}] (2), [Me₂Al{(N^tBu)(NSiMe₃)P(NH^tBu)₂}] (3) and [Mg{(N^tBu)(NSiMe₃)P(NH^tBu)₂}₂] (4), respectively. Attempts to further deprotonate complex 2 with n-butyllithium or di-n-butylmagnesium result in nucleophilic displacement of the methylzinc fragment by lithium or magnesium. The two remaining amino protons of 3 are removed by reaction with di-n-butylmagnesium to give a heterobimetallic complex in which the coordination sphere of magnesium is completed by two molecules of THF (5 · 2THF) or one molecule of TMEDA (5 · TMEDA). Reaction of complex 3 with 1 equiv. of n-butyllithium followed by treatment of the product with di-n-butylmagnesium yields the complex {Me₂Al[(N^tBu)(NSiMe₃)P(N^tBu)₂]MgBu} Li · 4THF (6 · 4THF), the first example of a triply deprotonated complex of 1 containing three different metals. Reaction of complex 5 with iodine results in cleavage of an Al–Me group to give {MeIAl[(N^tBu)(NSiMe₃)P(N^tBu)₂Mg]} (7). Complexes 5 · 2THF, 5 · TMEDA, 6 · 4THF and 7 have been characterized in solution by multinuclear (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P and ⁷Li) NMR spectroscopy, while the solid-state structures of 2, 4 and 5 · 2THF have been determined by X-ray crystallography.     

Substitution reactions involving cyclometalated platinum(II) complexes: Kinetic investigations

Substitution reaction of the labile SMe₂ ligand in the cyclometalated platinum(II) complexes of general formula [PtAr(ppy)(SMe₂)], 1, in which ppy = deprotonated 2-phenylpyridyl and Ar = p-MeC₆H₄ or p-MeOC₆H₄, by several N or P donor reagents were studied; the N-donors, N, are pyridine (Py) and substituted pyridines, N = 4-MePy, Py, Py-d₅, 2-MePy, 3-PhPy, 3,4-Me₂Py, 4-^tBuPy or 3-C(O)OMePy, and the P-donors, L, are phosphines or phosphites, L = P(OPh)₃, P(O-ⁱPr)₃, PPh₃, PPh₂Me and L₂ = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂, bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm). The products were identified by multinuclear NMR studies as [PtAr(ppy)(N)], 2, or [PtAr(ppy)(L)], 3, respectively. Complexes 1 have a MLCT band in the visible region which was used to easily follow the kinetics of the ligand substitution reactions by UV-vis spectroscopy. Although the complexes 1 contain two cis Pt-C bonds, the substitution reactions followed a normal associative mechanism. The rates of reactions were depended on the concentration and the nature of the entering group. The ΔH^‡/ΔS^‡ compensation plot gave a straight line suggesting the operation of the same mechanism for all entering nucleophiles.     

Activation of C–H and H–H bonds by dinuclear iridium complexes. Oxidative addition to highly active unsaturated 32e− diiridium species

Reactions of [(Cp¹Ir)₂(μ-dmpm)(μ-H)₂][OTf]₂ (1) with NaO^tBu in aromatic solvent at room temperature give [(Cp¹Ir)(H)(μ-dmpm)(μ-H)(Cp¹Ir)(Ar)][OTf] [Ar = Ph (3), p-Tol (4a), m-Tol (4b), 2-furyl (5a), 3-furyl (5b)] via intermolecular aromatic C–H activation. Treatment of [(Cp¹Ir)₂(μ-dppm)(μ-H)₂][OTf]₂ (2) with weak base (Et₂NH) results in intramolecular C–H activation of a phenyl group in the dppm ligand to give [(Cp¹Ir)(H){μ-PPh(C₆H₄)CH₂PPh₂}(μ-H)(Cp¹Ir)][OTf] (6). Reaction of 1 with NaO^tBu in tetrahydrofuran under H₂ (1 atm) results in activation of the H–H bond to give [{(Cp¹Ir)(H)}₂(μ-dmpm)(μ-H)][OTf] (7). Reaction of 1 with NaO^tBu in dichloromethane under carbon monoxide (1 atm) gives a carbonyl-bridged Ir^II–Ir^II complex, [(Cp¹Ir)₂(μ-dmpm)(μ-H)(μ-CO)][OTf] (8-OTf). These results strongly suggest that the active species in C–H and H–H bond activation starting with 1 and 2 would be unsaturated 32e^? diiridium species. The structures of 3, 5a, 6, 7, and 8-BPh₄ have been determined by X-ray diffraction methods.     

Structural assemblies of four Cd(II) coordination polymers based on 5-methylisophthalic acid

Four new metal-organic coordination polymers, Cd(mip)(DMF)(1), Cd(mip)(EtOH)(2), Cd₂(mip)₂(H₂O)₅·3H₂O (3), Cd(mip)(bpp)(H₂O)·H₂O (4) (H₂mip = 5-methylisophthalic acid, bpp = 1,3-di(4-pyridyl)propane) have been hydro(solvo)thermally synthesized and characterized by IR, thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, powder X-ray diffraction and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. 1 and 2 are isostructural, and two adjacent Cd centers are bridged by four carboxylate groups in μ₂-carboxylato-κ¹O_.:κ¹O′ and μ₂Ο; κ²O,O′ fashion to form a linear (Cd–O–Cd)_n chain. The adjacent (Cd–O–Cd)_n chains are further connected by mip bridges to form a 3D framework. 3 features two types of chiral layers: One left-handed and another right-handed, which lead to racemic solid-state compound. 4 exhibits a two-dimensional wave-like (2D) (4,4) layer structure with infinite 1D linear chain. In addition, the luminescent properties of 1–4 are also discussed.     

A convenient MnIII starting material for the synthesis of homo- and heterometallic manganese carboxylate clusters: Mn9 and Mn10−xFex complexes

The use of a convenient source of Mn^III ions, namely the [Mn(OR)(O₂CR′)₂]_n (R = H, Me, and R′ = Me, Bu^t) family of 1-D coordination polymers, afforded two new enneanuclear and decanuclear molecular clusters, homometallic [Mn₉O₇(O₂CBu^t)₁₃(MeCN)₂] (3) and heterometallic [Mn_10?xFe_x(OMe)₂₀(O₂CMe)₁₀] (x < 10) (4), respectively. Compound 3 was synthesized by a solvent-induced structural transformation, whereas complex 4 resulted from the reaction of [Mn(OH)(O₂CMe)₂]_n with an Fe^III source. The core of 3 comprises two [Mn₄O₂]⁸⁺ butterfly units and a [Mn₃O]⁷⁺ triangular unit fused together by sharing one Mn atom. Magnetic susceptibility measurements of 3 revealed dominant antiferromagnetic interactions within the molecule, and a ground state of S = 1 with many low-lying excited states. Complex 4 is a mixed Fe^III/Mn^III single-strand molecular wheel, which forms 3D nanotubular stacks arranged in a zig–zag fashion. The described work suggests that the [Mn(OR)(O₂CR′)₂]_n compounds represent excellent starting materials for Mn^III carboxylate cluster chemistry.     

Reactions of trans-[RuCl2(CO)2(PEt3)2] with 1,1-dithiolates: Stepwise formation of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt3)(S2X)] (X = CNMe2, CNEt2, COEt,P(OEt)2, PPh2)

Trans-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PEt₃)₂] reacts with two equivalents of a series of 1,1-dithiolate ligands to form the bis(dithiolate) complexes, cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂X)₂] (X = CNMe₂, CNEt₂, COEt, P(OEt)₂, PPh₂). Two intermediates have been isolated; trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂Cl(CO){S₂P(OEt)₂}] and trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂(CO)(η¹-S₂COEt)(η²-S₂COEt)], allowing a simple reaction scheme to be postulated involving three steps; (i) initial replacement of cis carbonyl and chloride ligands, (ii) substitution of the second chloride, (iii) loss of a phosphine. Thermolysis of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂CNMe₂)₂] with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in xylene affords trinuclear [Ru₃(μ₃-S)₂(PEt₃)(CO)₈] as a result of dithiocarbamate degradation. Crystal structures of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂X)₂] (X = NMe₂, COEt), trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂Cl(CO){S₂P(OEt)₂}], trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂(CO)(η¹-S₂COEt)(η²-S₂COEt)] and [Ru₃(μ₃-S)₂(PEt₃)(CO)₈] are reported.     

Preparation and reactivity of p-cymene complexes of ruthenium and osmium incorporating 1,3-triazenide ligands

p-Cymene complexes MCl₂(η⁶-p-cymene)L [M = Ru, Os; L = P(OEt)₃, PPh(OEt)₂, (CH₃)₃CNC] were prepared by allowing [MCl(μ-Cl)(η⁶-p-cymene)]₂ to react with phosphites or tert-butyl isocyanide. Treatment of MCl₂(η⁶-p-cymene)L complexes with 1,3-ArNNN(H)Ar triazene and an excess of NEt₃ gave the cationic triazenide derivatives [M(η²-1,3-ArNNNAr)(η⁶-p-cymene)L]BPh₄ (Ar = Ph, p-tolyl). Neutral triazenide complexes MCl(η²-1,3-ArNNNAr)(η⁶-p-cymene) (M = Ru, Os) were also prepared by allowing [MCl(μ-Cl)(η⁶-p-cymene)]₂ to react with 1,3-diaryltriazene in the presence of triethylamine. p-Cymene complexes MCl₂(η⁶-p-cymene)L reacted with equimolar amounts of 1,3-ArNNN(H)Ar triazene to give both triazenide complexes [M(η²-1,3-ArNNNAr)(η⁶-p-cymene)L]BPh₄ and amine derivatives [MCl(ArNH₂)(η⁶-p-cymene)L]BPh₄. A reaction path for the formation of the amine complex is also reported. The complexes were characterised by spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography of RuCl₂(η⁶-p-cymene)[PPh(OEt)₂] and [Ru(η²-1,3-p-tolyl-NNN-p-tolyl)(η⁶-p-cymene){CNC(CH₃)₃}]BPh₄. Selected triazenide complexes were studied as catalysts in the hydrogenation of 2-cyclohexen-1-one and cinnamaldehyde.     

Carbonyl and nitrosyl diruthenium compounds: Crystal structure of [Ru2(O2CMe)(DPhF)3(CO)]BF4 · CH2Cl2 and its isomorphous nitrosyl analogue

The reaction of [Ru₂(O₂CMe)(DPhF)₃(H₂O)]BF₄ (DPhF = N,N′-diphenylformamidinate) with CO gas leads to [Ru₂(O₂CMe)(DPhF)₃(CO)]BF₄ (1), that is the first isolated carbonyl complex containing the Ru₂⁵⁺ unit. The nitrosyl analogue [Ru₂(O₂CMe)(DPhF)₃(NO)]BF₄ (2) is prepared by reaction of Ru₂Cl(O₂CMe)(DPhF)₃ with NOBF₄. However, the attempts to obtain the cyanide derivative by reaction of Ru₂Cl(O₂CMe)(DPhF)₃ or [Ru₂(O₂CMe)(DPhF)₃(H₂O)]BF₄ with NaCN were unsuccessful. The structure of compounds 1 · CH₂Cl₂ and 2 · CH₂Cl₂ are described. Both compounds are isomorphous. The magnetic measurements at variable temperature demonstrate that 1 is paramagnetic with one unpaired electron in all range of temperature, in contrast to the three unpaired electrons usually present in Ru₂⁵⁺ complexes. The analogous nitrosyl compound 2 is diamagnetic.     

Preparation and reactivity of half-sandwich hydrazine complexes of ruthenium and osmium

Hydrazine complexes [MCl(η⁶-p-cymene)(RNHNH₂)L]BPh₄ (1–6) [M = Ru, Os; R = H, Me, Ph; L = P(OEt)₃, PPh(OEt)₂, PPh₂OEt] were prepared by allowing dichloro complexes MCl₂(η⁶-p-cymene)L to react with hydrazines RNHNH₂ in the presence of NaBPh₄. Treatment of ruthenium complexes [RuCl(η⁶-p-cymene)(RNHNH₂)L]BPh₄ with Pb(OAc)₄ led to acetate complex [Ru(κ²–O₂CCH₃)(η⁶-p-cymene)L]BPh₄ (7). Instead, the reaction of osmium derivatives [OsCl(η⁶-p-cymene)(CH₃NHNH₂)L]BPh₄ with Pb(OAc)₄ afforded the methyldiazenido complex [Os(CH₃N₂)(η⁶-p-cymene)L}]BPh₄ (8). Treatment with HCl of this diazenido complex 8 led to the methyldiazene cation [OsCl(CH₃NNH)(η⁶-p-cymene)L}]⁺ (9⁺). The complexes were characterised spectroscopically and by X-ray crystal structure determination of [OsCl(η⁶-p-cymene)(PhNHNH₂){PPh(OEt)₂}]BPh₄ (6b) and [Ru(κ²–O₂CCH₃)(η⁶-p-cymene){PPh(OEt)₂}]BPh₄ (7b).     

Unprecedented multistability in dodecanuclear complex compound observed by Mössbauer spectroscopy

The precursors [Fe(III)(^5XL)Cl] (^5XLH₂ = N,N′-bis(1-hydroxy-2-benzyliden)-1,6-diamino-3-X-hexane, X = N,S) are high-spin (S = 5/2) complexes. This precursors are combined with the bridging unit [(NC)₅Fe(II)-CN-Co(III)(CN)₅]⁶⁻ to yield star-shaped dodecanuclear clusters, [(^5XLFe(III)-NC)₅Fe(II)-CN-Co(III)(CN-Fe(III)^5XL)₅]Cl₄. The star-shaped compounds are high-spin systems at room temperature. On cooling to 20 K some of the iron(III) centers in the N-star switch to the low-spin state as proven by Mössbauer spectroscopy, i.e. multiple electronic transitions, while the S-star remains in the high-spin state.     

Tellurium(II) and tellurium(IV) complexes of phosphine chalcogenide ligands,synthesis and X-ray structures

Reaction of TeX₄ (X = Cl or Br) with 2 mol. equiv. of OPR₃ (R = Me, Et or Ph) gives the distorted octahedral cis-[TeX₄(OPR₃)₂], while the bidentates Ph₂P(E)(CH₂)_nP(E)Ph₂ (E = O, n = 1 or 2; E = S, n = 1) give the six-coordinate [TeX₄{Ph₂P(E)(CH₂)_nP(E)Ph₂}]. These species have been characterised spectroscopically (via ¹H and ³¹P{¹H} NMR and IR) and by crystallographic analyses on cis-[TeBr₄(OPPh₃)₂], [TeCl₄{Ph₂P(O)CH₂P(O)Ph₂}] and [TeBr₄{Ph₂P(S)CH₂P(S)Ph₂}]. The TeX₄ (X = Cl or Br) are reduced by Ph₂P(S)(CH₂)₂P(S)Ph₂ and Ph₂P(Se)CH₂P(Se)Ph₂, giving the planar, four-coordinate Te(II) species [Te{Ph₂P(S)(CH₂)₂P(S)Ph₂}₂]²⁺ (isolated as [(TeCl₅)₂{μ-Ph₂P(S)(CH₂)₂P(S)Ph₂}]^2? and [TeBr₆]^2? salts) and [TeBr₂{Ph₂P(Se)CH₂P(Se)Ph₂}], all of which have also been identified crystallographically. On the basis of the structural data the Te-based lone pair associated with the Te(IV) species is assumed to occupy the 5s orbital, whereas in the Te(II) complexes the planar coordination is consistent with the two stereochemically active lone pairs occupying the axial sites.