Multi-choice goal programming with utility functions

Goal programming (GP) has been, and still is, the most widely used technique for solving multiple-criteria decision problems and multiple-objective decision problems by finding a set of satisfying solutions. However, the major limitation of goal programming is that can only use aspiration levels with scalar value for solving multiple objective problems. In order to solve this problem multi-choice goal programming (MCGP) was proposed by Chang (2007a). Following the idea of MCGP this study proposes a new concept of level achieving in the utility functions to replace the aspiration level with scalar value in classical GP and MCGP for multiple objective problems. According to this idea, it is possible to use the skill of MCGP with utility functions to solve multi-objective problems. The major contribution of using the utility functions of MCGP is that they can be used as measuring instruments to help decision makers make the best/appropriate policy corresponding to their goals with the highest level of utility achieved. In addition, the above properties can improve the practical utility of MCGP in solving more real-world decision/management problems.     

A mathematical immunochemoradiotherapy model: A multiobjective approach

This study developed a near optimization immunochemoradiotherapy model, which has three objectives; maximizing total weighted damage of cancer cells, minimizing total weighted side effect and minimizing total dose related therapy costs, originated from the Weapon–Target Assignment problem (WTA) of military operations research. The multi-objective structure is transformed into a single-objective format via goal programming. The presented model is a mixed-integer nonlinear goal programming model. A non-clinical hypothetical illustrative example is solved using MS Excel's Solver tool as a powerful spreadsheet tool. The theoretical result is extremely impressive especially compared with result of the single-objective program. The model facilitates cancer therapists to act in a multi-objective frame. However, the model is extremely needed to have clinical experiments to validate its theoretical power. This theoretical model is a virtuous synthesis of military and medical operations research.     

Omni-optimizer: A generic evolutionary algorithm for single and multi-objective optimization

Due to the vagaries of optimization problems encountered in practice, users resort to different algorithms for solving different optimization problems. In this paper, we suggest and evaluate an optimization procedure which specializes in solving a wide variety of optimization problems. The proposed algorithm is designed as a generic multi-objective, multi-optima optimizer. Care has been taken while designing the algorithm such that it automatically degenerates to efficient algorithms for solving other simpler optimization problems, such as single-objective uni-optimal problems, single-objective multi-optima problems and multi-objective uni-optimal problems. The efficacy of the proposed algorithm in solving various problems is demonstrated on a number of test problems chosen from the literature. Because of its efficiency in handling different types of problems with equal ease, this algorithm should find increasing use in real-world optimization problems.     

Regularized optimization methods for convex MINLP problems

We propose regularized cutting-plane methods for solving mixed-integer nonlinear programming problems with nonsmooth convex objective and constraint functions. The given methods iteratively search for trial points in certain localizer sets, constructed by employing linearizations of the involved functions. New trial points can be chosen in several ways; for instance, by minimizing a regularized cutting-plane model if functions are costly. When dealing with hard-to-evaluate functions, the goal is to solve the optimization problem by performing as few function evaluations as possible. Numerical experiments comparing the proposed algorithms with classical methods in this area show the effectiveness of our approach.     

数学规划与约束规划整合下的多目标分组排序问题研究

分组排序问题属于NP-难题, 单纯的数学规划模型或约束规划模型都无法在有效时间内解决相当规模的此类问题. 控制成本、缩短工期和减少任务延迟是排序问题的三个基本目标, 在实际工作中决策者通常需要兼顾三者, 并在 三者之间进行权衡. 多目标分组排序问题 的研究增强了排序问题的实际应用价值, 有利于帮助决策者处理复杂的多目标环境. 然而, 多目标的引入也增加了问题求解难度, 针对数学规划擅长寻找最优, 约束规划擅长排序的特点, 将两类方法整合起来, 提出一个基于Benders分解算法, 极大提高了此类问题的求解 效率.     

A hybrid approach combining interior-point and branch-and-bound methods applied to the problem of sugar cane waste

This paper proposes a hybrid approach for solving the multi-objective model related to the minimisation of sugar cane waste collection costs and/or the maximisation of produced energy by this waste, with the aid of strategies for solving multi-objective problems, which transform the problem into a set of single-objective problems. This approach combines the predictor-corrector primal-dual interior-point and branch-and-bound methods in order to solve these single-objective problems. The model consists in identifying the sugar cane varieties with the lowest waste collection costs, while simultaneously it aims to obtain the greatest amount of produced energy by this waste. The hybrid methods are implemented in C++ programming language, and tests are performed to determine the efficient solutions in Pareto optimal sense of the multi-objective model and compare the performance of the hybrid method using the integrality test and without considering it. The mathematical results confirm that the proposed hybrid method for solving the aforementioned models presents good computational performance and reliable solutions.     

Fuzzy goal programming for multiobjective transportation problems

Several fuzzy approaches can be considered for solving multiobjective transportation problem. This paper presents a fuzzy goal programming approach to determine an optimal compromise solution for the multiobjective transportation problem. We assume that each objective function has a fuzzy goal. Also we assign a special type of nonlinear (hyperbolic) membership function to each objective function to describe each fuzzy goal. The approach focuses on minimizing the negative deviation variables from 1 to obtain a compromise solution of the multiobjective transportation problem. We show that the proposed method and the fuzzy programming method are equivalent. In addition, the proposed approach can be applied to solve other multiobjective mathematical programming problems. A numerical example is given to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed approach.     

Reduced Jacobian Method

In this paper, we present the Wolfe’s reduced gradient method for multiobjective (multicriteria) optimization. We precisely deal with the problem of minimizing nonlinear objectives under linear constraints and propose a reduced Jacobian method, namely a reduced gradient-like method that does not scalarize those programs. As long as there are nondominated solutions, the principle is to determine a direction that decreases all goals at the same time to achieve one of them. Following the reduction strategy, only a reduced search direction is to be found. We show that this latter can be obtained by solving a simple differentiable and convex program at each iteration. Moreover, this method is conceived to recover both the discontinuous and continuous schemes of Wolfe for the single-objective programs. The resulting algorithm is proved to be (globally) convergent to a Pareto KKT-stationary (Pareto critical) point under classical hypotheses and a multiobjective Armijo line search condition. Finally, experiment results over test problems show a net performance of the proposed algorithm and its superiority against a classical scalarization approach, both in the quality of the approximated Pareto front and in the computational effort.     

Using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for single-objective optimization

In recent decades, several multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have been successfully applied to a wide variety of multi-objective optimization problems. Along the way, several new concepts, paradigms and methods have emerged. Additionally, some authors have claimed that the application of multi-objective approaches might be useful even in single-objective optimization. Thus, several guidelines for solving single-objective optimization problems using multi-objective methods have been proposed. This paper offers a survey of the main methods that allow the use of multi-objective schemes for single-objective optimization. In addition, several open topics and some possible paths of future work in this area are identified.     

A Hybrid Meta-Heuristic for Multi-Objective Optimization: MOSATS

Real optimization problems often involve not one, but multiple objectives, usually in conflict. In single-objective optimization there exists a global optimum, while in the multi-objective case no optimal solution is clearly defined but rather a set of solutions, called the Pareto-optimal front. Thus, the goal of multi-objective strategies is to generate a set of non-dominated solutions as an approximation to this front. However, the majority of problems of this kind cannot be solved exactly because they have very large and highly complex search spaces. In recent years, meta-heuristics have become important tools for solving multi-objective problems encountered in industry as well as in the theoretical field. This paper presents a novel approach based on hybridizing Simulated Annealing and Tabu Search. Experiments on the Graph Partitioning Problem show that this new method is a better tool for approximating the efficient set than other strategies also based on these meta-heuristics.     

Goal programming using multiple objective hybrid metaheuristic algorithm

In this paper, a Goal Programming (GP) model is converted into a multi-objective optimization problem (MOO) of minimizing deviations from fixed goals. To solve the resulting MOO problem, a hybrid metaheuristic with two steps is proposed to find the Pareto set's solutions. First, a Record-to-Record Travel with an adaptive memory is used to find first non-dominated Pareto frontier solutions preemptively. Second, a Variable Neighbour Search technique with three transformation types is used to intensify every non dominated solution found in the first Pareto frontier to produce the final Pareto frontier solutions. The efficiency of the proposed approach is demonstrated by solving two nonlinear GP test problems and three engineering design problems. In all problems, multiple solutions to the GP problem are found in one single simulation run. The results prove that the proposed algorithm is robust, fast and simply structured, and manages to find high-quality solutions in short computational times by efficiently alternating search diversification and intensification using very few user-defined parameters.     

Fuzzy criteria for feature selection

The presence of less relevant or highly correlated features often decrease classification accuracy. Feature selection in which most informative variables are selected for model generation is an important step in data-driven modeling. In feature selection, one often tries to satisfy multiple criteria such as feature discriminating power, model performance or subset cardinality. Therefore, a multi-objective formulation of the feature selection problem is more appropriate. In this paper, we propose to use fuzzy criteria in feature selection by using a fuzzy decision making framework. This formulation allows for a more flexible definition of the goals in feature selection, and avoids the problem of weighting different goals is classical multi-objective optimization. The optimization problem is solved using an ant colony optimization algorithm proposed in our previous work. We illustrate the added value of the approach by applying our proposed fuzzy feature selection algorithm to eight benchmark problems.     

A modified objective function method for solving nonlinear multiobjective fractional programming problems

A new method is used for solving nonlinear multiobjective fractional programming problems having V-invex objective and constraint functions with respect to the same function η. In this approach, an equivalent vector programming problem is constructed by a modification of the objective fractional function in the original nonlinear multiobjective fractional problem. Furthermore, a modified Lagrange function is introduced for a constructed vector optimization problem. By the help of the modified Lagrange function, saddle point results are presented for the original nonlinear fractional programming problem with several ratios. Finally, a Mond-Weir type dual is associated, and weak, strong and converse duality results are established by using the introduced method with a modified function. To obtain these duality results between the original multiobjective fractional programming problem and its original Mond-Weir duals, a modified Mond-Weir vector dual problem with a modified objective function is constructed.     

An a posteriori decision support methodology for solving the multi-criteria supplier selection problem

This research presents a novel, state-of-the-art methodology for solving a multi-criteria supplier selection problem considering risk and sustainability. It combines multi-objective optimization with the analytic network process to take into account sustainability requirements of a supplier portfolio configuration. To integrate ‘risk’ into the supplier selection problem, we develop a multi-objective optimization model based on the investment portfolio theory introduced by Markowitz. The proposed model is a non-standard portfolio selection problem with four objectives: (1) minimizing the purchasing costs, (2) selecting the supplier portfolio with the highest logistics service, (3) minimizing the supply risk, and (4) ordering as much as possible from those suppliers with outstanding sustainability performance. The optimization model, which has three linear and one quadratic objective function, is solved by an algorithm that analytically computes a set of efficient solutions and provides graphical decision support through a visualization of the complete and exactly-computed Pareto front (a posteriori approach). The possibility of computing all Pareto-optimal supplier portfolios is beneficial for decision makers as they can compare all optimal solutions at once, identify the trade-offs between the criteria, and study how the different objectives of supplier portfolio configuration may be balanced to finally choose the composition that satisfies the purchasing company's strategy best. The approach has been applied to a real-world supplier portfolio configuration case to demonstrate its applicability and to analyze how the consideration of sustainability requirements may affect the traditional supplier selection and purchasing goals in a real-life setting.     

Annealing-tabu PAES: a multi-objective hybrid meta-heuristic

Most real-life optimization problems require taking into account not one, but multiple objectives simultaneously. In most cases these objectives are in conflict, i.e. the improvement of some objectives implies the deterioration of others. In single-objective optimization there exists a global optimum, while in the multi-objective case no optimal solution is clearly defined, but rather a set of solutions. In the last decade most papers dealing with multi-objective optimization use the concept of Pareto-optimality. The goal of Pareto-based multi-objective strategies is to generate a front (set) of non-dominated solutions as an approximation to the true Pareto-optimal front. However, this front is unknown for problems with large and highly complex search spaces, which is why meta-heuristic methods have become important tools for solving this kind of problem. Hybridization in the multi-objective context is nowadays an open research area. This article presents a novel extension of the well-known Pareto archived evolution strategy (PAES) which combines simulated annealing and tabu search. Experiments on several mathematical problems show that this hybridization allows an improvement in the quality of the non-dominated solutions in comparison with PAES, and also with its extension M-PAES.     

Solving multi-level multi-objective linear programming problems through fuzzy goal programming approach

In this paper, two new algorithms are presented to solve multi-level multi-objective linear programming (ML-MOLP) problems through the fuzzy goal programming (FGP) approach. The membership functions for the defined fuzzy goals of all objective functions at all levels are developed in the model formulation of the problem; so also are the membership functions for vectors of fuzzy goals of the decision variables, controlled by decision makers at the top levels. Then the fuzzy goal programming approach is used to achieve the highest degree of each of the membership goals by minimizing their deviational variables and thereby obtain the most satisfactory solution for all decision makers.     

Uncertain random goal programming

Goal programming provides an efficient technique to deal with decision making problems with multiple conflicting objectives. This paper joins the streams of research on goal programming by providing a so-called uncertain random goal programming to model the multi-objective optimization problem involving uncertain random variables. Several equivalent deterministic forms are derived on the condition that the set of parameters consists of uncertain variables and random variables. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the application of the approach.     

Branch and probability bound methods in multi-objective optimization

An approach to non-convex multi-objective optimization problems is considered where only the values of objective functions are required by the algorithm. The proposed approach is a generalization of the probabilistic branch-and-bound approach well applicable to complicated problems of single-objective global optimization. In the present paper the concept of probabilistic branch-and-bound based multi-objective optimization algorithms is discussed, and some illustrations are presented.     

On minkowski metric and weighted tchebyshev norm in vector optimization ∗

The typical approach in solving vector optimization problems is to scalarize the vector cost function into a single cost function by means of some utility or value function. A very large class of utility function is given by the Minkowski’s metric proposed by Charnes and Cooper in the context of goal programming. This includes the special case of linear scalarization and the weighted Tchebyshev norm. We shall furnish a rigorous justification that there is no equivalent relationship between the general vector optimization problem and scalarized optimization problems using any Minkowski’s metric utility function. Furthermore, we also show that the weighted Tchebyshev norm is, in some sense, the best amongst the class of Minkowski’s metric utility functions since it is the only scalarization method which yields an equivalence relation between the weak vector optimization problem and a set of scalar optimization problems, without any convexity assumption