Block and star block copolymers by mechanism transformation. I. Synthesis of PTHF‐PSt‐PTHF by the transformation of ATRP into CROP

Polystyrene (PSt) with end‐terminal bromine (Br‐PSt‐Br) was synthesized by the atom transfer radical polymerization of styrene with the difunctional initiator 1,2‐bis(2′‐bromobutyryloxy)ethane in combination with CuBr and bipyridine. The Br‐PSt‐Br reacted with silver perchlorate at −78 °C, and the resulting macromolecular initiator was used to initiate the polymerization of tetrahydrofuran. Triblock poly(tetrahydrofuran)‐polystyrene‐poly(tetrahydrofuran) (PTHF‐PSt‐PTHF) diol was obtained after propagation at −15 °C. The conversion of the polymerization was measured by gas chromatography. The structures of the triblock copolymer PTHF‐PSt‐PTHF diol were characterized by ¹H NMR and gel permeation chromatography. The mechanism of cationic ring‐opening polymerization is discussed. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 337–344, 2000     

Synthesis and characterization of core–shell‐type polymeric micelles from diblock copolymers via reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer

A method was developed to enable the formation of nanoparticles by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization. The thermoresponsive behavior of polymeric micelles was modified by means of micellar inner cores and an outer shell. Polymeric micelles comprising AB block copolymers of poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) (PIPAAm) and poly(2‐hydroxyethylacrylate) (PHEA) or polystyrene (PSt) were prepared. PIPAAm‐b‐PHEA and PIPAAm‐b‐PSt block copolymers formed a core–shell micellar structure after the dialysis of the block copolymer solutions in organic solvents against water at 20 °C. Upon heating above the lower critical solution temperature (LCST), PIPAAm‐b‐PHEA micelles exhibited an abrupt increase in polarity and an abrupt decrease in rigidity sensed by pyrene. In contrast, PIPAAm‐b‐PSt micelles maintained constant values with lower polarity and higher rigidity than those of PIPAAm‐b‐PHEA micelles over the temperature range of 20–40 °C. Structural deformations produced by the change in the outer polymer shell with temperature cycles through the LCST were proposed for the PHEA core, which possessed a lower glass‐transition temperature (ca. 20 °C) than the LCST of the PIPAAm outer shell (ca. 32.5 °C), whereas the PSt core with a much higher glass‐transition temperature (ca. 100 °C) retained its structure. The nature of the hydrophobic segments composing the micelle inner core offered an important control point for thermoresponsive drug release and the drug activity of the thermoresponsive polymeric micelles. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 3312–3320, 2006     

Selective formation of diblock copolymers using radical trap‐assisted atom transfer radical coupling

Polystyrene (PSt) radicals and poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) radicals, derived from their monobrominated precursors prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), were formed in the presence of the radical trap 2‐methyl‐2‐nitrosopropane (MNP), selectively forming PSt‐PMA diblock copolymers with an alkoxyamine at the junction between the block segments. This radical trap‐assisted, atom transfer radical coupling (RTA‐ATRC) was performed in a single pot at low temperature (35 °C), while analogous traditional ATRC reactions at this temperature, which lacked the radical trap, resulted in no observed coupling and the PStBr and PMABr precursors were simply recovered. Selective formation of the diblock under RTA‐ATRC conditions is consistent with the PStBr and PMABr having substantially different K_ATRP values, with PSt radicals initially being formed and trapped by the MNP and the PMA radicals being trapped by the in situ‐formed nitroxide end‐capped PSt. The midchain alkoxyamine functionality was confirmed by thermolysis of the diblock copolymer, resulting in recovery of the PSt segment and degradation of the PMA block at the relatively high temperatures (125 °C) required for thermal cleavage. A PSt‐PMA diblock formed by chain extenstion ATRP using PStBr as the macroinitiator (thus lacking the alkoxyamine between the PSt‐PMA segements) was inert to thermolysis. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 3619–3626     

Polymerization of N-(p-aminobenzoyl)caprolactam: Block and alternating copolymers of aromatic and aliphatic polyamides

The polymerization behavior of N-(p-aminobenzoyl)caprolactam was studied. It was found that polymerization could proceed by either elimination of caprolactam or by ring opening. Polymers prepared at temperatures above 200°C showed a greater tendency for ring opening to produce alternating aromatic/aliphatic copolymers than did polymers prepared at lower temperatures. Block copolymers of poly(p-benzamide) and nylon 6 were prepared by a two-stage hydrolytic polymerization process or by anionic polymerization at temperatures > 200°C. Polymer microstructures were determined using ¹³C-NMR spectroscopy by comparison with homopolymers and model alternating copolymers. The alternating copolymer prepared by condensation of N-(p-aminobenzoyl)-6-caproic acid showed a melting transition at 300–305°C in the DSC and a T_g in subsequent heating cycles of 116–119°C. Copolymers made with the two-stage process were rich in p-benzamide sequences and showed no T_g or T_m below 400°C. Copolymer made with NaH was rich in nylon 6 units, showed a T_m of 175–180°C and a T_g of 80–81°C, and was homogeneous in both the melt and solid.     

Block polymers from isocyanate-terminated intermediates. II. Preparation of butadiene–ϵ-caprolactam and styrene–ϵ-caprolactam block polymers

Polystyrene–nylon 6 and polybutadiene–nylon 6 block copolymers have been prepared from isocyanate-terminated prepolymers. From extraction and fractionation data the products obtained were found to be mixtures of both homopolymers and pure block copolymer. The polybutadiene–nylon 6 copolymers are extremely pliable at ambient temperatures even at high ?-caprolactam contents (70–80 wt-%). This is true even though these copolymers show a crystalline melting point at 213°C similar to poly-?-caprolactam. Presumably this unusual behavior occurs because of the nature of the synthesis which renders the butadiene portion of these copolymers the continuous phase. Plasticity measurements indicate that pliability is dependent on the molecular weight of the block poly-?-caprolactam.     

Polyisobutylene-Based Thermoplastic Elastomers. I. Synthesis and Characterization of Polystyrene-Polyisobutylene-Polystyrene Triblock Copolymers

Abstract

Polystyrene-polyisobutylene-polystyrene triblock copolymer thermoplastic elastomers have been synthesized by living carbocationic sequential copolymerization using the tert-butyl dicumyl chloride/TiCl₄/methylcyclohexane:methyl chloride (60:40 v:v)/ ?80°C system in the presence of the proton trap 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine. Structure-property relationships have been examined by varying the M_n of the PIB middle block (39,000 to 156,000) and that of the PSt end-segment (1,000 to 19,000). The tensile strength is controlled by the molecular weight of the PSt segment and independent of the PIB middle block length in the studied range. Phase separation starts when the M_n of the PSt segment reaches ～ 5,000, and it is complete when the M_n reaches ～ 15,000. These triblocks exhibited 23-25 MPa tensile strength, similar to that of styrenic thermoplastic elastomers obtained by anionic polymerization.     

Synthesis of Block Copolymers of 2‐Ethylhexyl Methacrylate,n‐Hexyl Methacrylate and Methyl Methacrylate via Anionic Polymerization at Ambient Temperature

It still remains a concern to break through the bottlenecks of anionic polymerization of polar monomers, such as side reactions, low conversion and low temperature (–78°C). In this work, potassium tert‐butoxide (t‐BuOK) was chosen to initiate the anionic polymerization of 2‐ethylhexyl methacrylate (EHMA) in tetrahydrofuran. The conversions were above 99% at 0 or 30°C, and above 95% at 60°C without side reaction inhibitors. The high conversions implied t‐BuOK could suppress the side reactions. A series of block copolymers of EHMA, n‐hexyl methacrylate (HMA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) were further synthesized at 0°C, and the conversions were all above 99%. The GPC and ¹H NMR results confirmed the successful synthesis of the block copolymers. The molecular size of monomer and the state of t‐BuOK (free ion pairs or aggregates) remarkably affected the polymerization rates and the molecular structures of the products. The DMA results indicated that the glass transition temperatures of PEHMA or PHMA block and PMMA block were 20°C and 60°C, respectively, which deviated from –2°C and 105°C of homopolymer, respectively, due to the partial compatibility of the blocks. This work explored a route of the anionic polymerization of polar monomers at room temperature.     

Synthesis and micellization of PSt‐PNIPAM‐PDMAEMA hetero‐arm star polymer with double thermo‐responsibility

A hetero‐arm star polymer, polystyrene‐poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide)‐ poly(2‐(dimethylamino)ethylmethacrylate) (PSt‐PNIPAM‐PDMAEMA), was synthesized by “clicking” the alkyne group at the junction of PSt‐b‐PNIPAM diblock copolymer onto the azide end‐group of PDMAEMA homopolymer via 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition. The resultant polymer was characterized by gel permeation chromatography, proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. PSt‐PNIPAM‐PDMAEMA micelles with PSt block as core and PNIPAM and PDMAEMA blocks as shell were formed when adding the copolymer solution in THF into 10 folds of water. Lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of PNIPAM and PDMAEMA homopolymer is 32 °C for PNIPAM and 40 to 50 °C for PDMAEMA, respectively. Upon continuous heating through their LCSTs, PSt‐PNIPAM‐PDMAEMA core‐shell micelles exhibited two‐stage thermally induced collapse. The first‐stage collapse, from 20 to 34 °C, is ascribed to the shrinkage of PNIPAM chains; and the second‐stage collapse, from 38 to 50 °C, is due to the shrinkage of PDMAEMA chains. Dynamic light scattering was used to confirm the double phase transitions. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 786–796, 2009     

Block and star block copolymers by mechanism transformation. II. Synthesis of poly(DOP‐b‐St) by combination of ATRP and CROP

Styrene underwent the ATRP process using an asymmetric difunctional initiator, 2‐hydroxylethyl 2′‐bromobutyrate in combination with CuBr and 2,2′‐bipyridine (bpy). Polystyrene with hydroxyl and bromine groups at each end of the polymer (HO‐PSt‐Br) was obtained, and used as a chain‐transfer agent in the cationic ring‐opening polymerization of 1,3‐dioxepane with triflic acid as initiator. The structures of the polymerization products were analyzed by ¹H NMR and GPC analyses, indicating the formation of block copolymer. The molecular weight distribution of the block copolymer was relatively narrow and the molecular weight of the polyDOP block was high. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 436–443, 2000     

Block and star block copolymers by mechanism transformation X. Synthesis of poly(ethylene oxide) methyl ether/polystyrene/poly(l-lactide) ABC miktoarm star copolymers by combination of RAFT and ROP

Poly(ethylene oxide) methyl ether/polystyrene/poly(l-lactide) (MPEO/PSt/PLLA) ABC miktoarm star copolymers were synthesized by combination of reversible addition-fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization and ring-opening polymerization (ROP) using bifunctional macro-transfer agent, MPEO with two terminal dithiobenzoate and hydroxyl groups. It was prepared by reaction of MPEO with maleic anhydride (MAh), subsequently reacted with dithiobenzoic acid and ethylene oxide. RAFT polymerization of St at 110 °C yielded block copolymer, MPEO-b-PSt [(MPEO)(PSt)CH₂OH], and then it was used to initiate the polymerization of l-lactide in the presence of Sn(OCt)₂ at 115 °C to produce ABC miktoarm star polymers, s-[(MPEO)(PSt)(PLLA)]. The structures of products obtained at each synthetic step were confirmed by NMR and gel permeation chromatography data.     

Novel miktofunctional initiator for the preparation of an ABC‐type miktoarm star polymer via a combination of controlled polymerization techniques

An ABC‐type miktoarm star polymer was prepared with a core‐out method via a combination of ring‐opening polymerization (ROP), stable free‐radical polymerization (SFRP), and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). First, ROP of ϵ‐caprolactone was carried out with a miktofunctional initiator, 2‐(2‐bromo‐2‐methyl‐propionyloxymethyl)‐3‐hydroxy‐2‐methyl‐propionic acid 2‐phenyl‐2‐(2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐piperidin‐1‐yl oxy)‐ethyl ester, at 110 °C. Second, previously obtained poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) (PCL) was used as a macroinitiator for SFRP of styrene at 125 °C. As a third step, this PCL–polystyrene (PSt) precursor with a bromine functionality in the core was used as a macroinitiator for ATRP of tert‐butyl acrylate in the presence of Cu(I)Br and pentamethyldiethylenetriamine at 100 °C. This produced an ABC‐type miktoarm star polymer [PCL–PSt–poly(tert‐butyl acrylate)] with a controlled molecular weight and a moderate polydispersity (weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight < 1.37). The obtained polymers were characterized with gel permeation chromatography and ¹H NMR. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 4228–4236, 2004     

Reverse atom transfer radical polymerization of vinyl monomers with Fe[SC(S)NEt2]3 alone as the catalyst

The living radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate and styrene was successfully carried out with diethyl 2,3‐dicyano‐2,3‐diphenylsuccinate (DCDPS)/ferric tri(diethyldithiocarbamate) as a novel reverse atom transfer radical polymerization initiation system in which DCDPS was a hexa‐substituted ethane‐type thermal iniferter, DC was a diethyldithiocarbamate group, and no additional ligands such as nitrogen‐ or phosphine‐based compounds were required. The bulk polymerization of methyl methacrylate was carried out at 95 °C, and that of styrene was carried out at 120 °C. Poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene (PSt) with high molecular weights and quite narrow molecular weight distributions (as low as 1.09 for PSt) were obtained. ¹H NMR spectroscopy revealed the presence of an α‐(carbethoxycyanophenyl)methyl group from the initiator and an ω‐DC group from the catalyst in the obtained polymers. Various chain‐extension reactions under UV light or thermal treatments were successfully conducted to prove the presence and efficient reinitiating of the ω‐DC group. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 39: 3464–3473, 2001     

Synthesis of miktoarm star and miktoarm star block copolymers via a combination of atom transfer radical polymerization and stable free‐radical polymerization

A trifunctional initiator, 2‐phenyl‐2‐[(2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl)‐1‐piperidinyloxy] ethyl 2,2‐bis[methyl(2‐bromopropionato)] propionate, was synthesized and used for the synthesis of miktoarm star AB₂ and miktoarm star block AB₂C₂ copolymers via a combination of stable free‐radical polymerization (SFRP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) in a two‐step or three‐step reaction sequence, respectively. In the first step, a polystyrene (PSt) macroinitiator with dual ω‐bromo functionality was obtained by SFRP of styrene (St) in bulk at 125 °C. Next, this PSt precursor was used as a macroinitiator for ATRP of tert‐butyl acrylate (tBA) in the presence of Cu(I)Br and pentamethyldiethylenetriamine at 80 °C, affording miktoarm star (PSt)(PtBA)₂ [where PtBA is poly(tert‐butyl acrylate)]. In the third step, the obtained St(tBA)₂ macroinitiator with two terminal bromine groups was further polymerized with methyl methacrylate by ATRP, and this resulted in (PSt)(PtBA)₂(PMMA)₂‐type miktoarm star block copolymer [where PMMA is poly(methyl methacrylate)] with a controlled molecular weight and a moderate polydispersity (weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight < 1.38). All polymers were characterized by gel permeation chromatography and ¹H NMR. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 2542–2548, 2003     

Block copolymers derived from azobiscyanopentanoic acid. IV. Synthesis of a polyamide–polystyrene block copolymer

Polyamides 6.10 and 6.6 (PA^* 6.10 and 6.6) containing small amounts of ? N?N? units in the main chains were prepared by interfacial polycondensation between hexamethylenediamine and sebacoyl chloride or adipoyl chloride with addition of azobiscyanopentanoyl chloride. Polyamide–polystyrene block copolymers (PA-b-PSt) were then prepared by decomposition of the ? N?N? units of PA^*, initiating radical polymerization of styrene in m-cresol. The average PA block length of PA-b-PSt thus formed was longer than that expected from the initially present PA segments between the ? N?N? units. This is probably due to recombination of PA radicals whose initiation efficiency is as low as 15%. The PSt blocks also had higher molecular weight (7000–79,000) in comparison with homopolystyrene produced from monomeric azobiscyanopentanoic acid used as an initiator due to higher viscosity of polymerization system. Variation of intrinsic viscosity and turbidimetric titration behavior along with the change in composition were also discussed.     

Synthesis and properties of novel polyimide/nylon‐6 triblock copolymers

Nylon‐6‐b‐polyimide‐b‐nylon‐6 copolymers were prepared by first synthesizing a series of imide oligomers end‐capped with phenyl 4‐aminobenzoate. The oligomers were then used to activate the anionic polymerization of molten ϵ‐caprolactam. In the block copolymer syntheses, the phenyl ester groups reacted quickly with caprolactam anions at 120 °C to generate N‐acyllactam moieties, which activated the anionic polymerization. In essence, nylon‐6 chains grew from the oligomer chain ends. All of the block copolymers had higher moduli and tensile strengths than those of nylon‐6. However, their elongations at break were much lower. The thermal stability, chemical resistance, moisture resistance, and impact strength were dramatically increased by the incorporation of only 5 wt % polyimide in the block copolymers. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 4247–4257, 2000     

Polyisobutylene-containing block polymers by sequential monomer addition. IV. New triblock thermoplastic elastomers comprising high Tg styrenic glassy segments: Synthesis,characterization and physical properties

New linear triblock thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) comprising a rubbery polyisobutylene (PIB) midblock flanked by two glassy endblocks of various styrenic polymers have been synthesized by living carbocationic polymerization by sequential monomer addition. First isobutylene (IB) was polymerized by a bifunctional tert-ether (dicumyl methyl ether) initiator in conjunction with TiCl₄ coinitiator in CH₃Cl/methylcyclohexane (MeCHx) (40/60 v/v) solvent mixtures at ?80°C. After the living narrow molecular weight distribution PIB midblock ( = 1.1–1.2) has reached the desired molecular weight, the styrenic monomers together with an electron pair donor (ED) and a proton trap (di-tert-butylpyridine, DtBP) were added to start the blocking of the glassy segments from the living ⊕PIB⊕ chain ends. While p-methylstyrene (pMeSt), p-t-butylstyrene (ptBuSt) and indene (In) gave essentially 100% blocking to the corresponding glassy endblocks, the blocking of 2,4,6-trimethylstyrene (TMeSt) and α-methylstyrene (αMeSt) were ineffective. Uncontrolled initiation by protic impurities was prevented by the use of DtBP. In the simultaneous presence of DtBP and the strong ED N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), TPEs with good mechanical properties (10–20 MPa tensile strength, 300–600% elongation) were prepared. The products exhibit a low and a high temperature T_g characteristic of phase separated rubbery and glassy domains. The service temperature of these new TPEs exceeds that of PSt–PIB–PSt triblock copolymers due to the higher T_gs (PpMeSt = 108, PptBuSt = 142 and PIn = 220–240°C) of the outer blocks. The T_g of the glassy blocks can be regulated by copolymerizing two styrene derivatives; a triblock copolymer with outer blocks of poly(pt-butylstyrene-co-indene) showed a single glassy transition T_g = +165°C, i.e., in between that of PptBuSt and PIn. Virgin TPEs have been repeatedly compression molded without deterioration of physical properties. The high melt flow index obtained with a TPE containing PptBuSt endblocks suggests superior processability relative to those with PSt end-blocks. The tensile strength retention at 60°C of the former TPE is far superior to that of a PSt–PIB–PSt triblock of similar composition.     

Block copolymer composition drives function of self‐assembled nanoparticles for delivery of small‐molecule cargo

Nanoparticles are useful for the delivery of small molecule therapeutics, increasing their solubility, in vivo residence time, and stability. Here, we used organocatalytic ring opening polymerization to produce amphiphilic block copolymers for the formation of nanoparticle drug carriers with enhanced stability, cargo encapsulation, and sustained delivery. These polymers comprised blocks of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(valerolactone) (PVL), and poly(lactide) (PLA). Four particle chemistries were examined: (a) PEG‐PLA, (b) PEG‐PVL, (c) a physical mixture of PEG–PLA and PEG–PVL, and (d) PEG–PVL–PLA tri‐block copolymers. Nanoparticle stability was assessed at room temperature (20 °C; pH = 7), physiological temperature (37 °C; pH = 7), in acidic media (37 °C; pH = 2), and with a digestive enzyme (lipase; 37 °C; pH = 7.4). PVL‐based nanoparticles demonstrated the highest level of stability at room temperature, 37 °C and acidic conditions, but were rapidly degraded by lipase. Moreover, PVL‐based nanoparticles demonstrated good cargo encapsulation, but rapid release. In contrast, PLA‐based nanoparticles demonstrated poor stability and encapsulation, but sustained release. The PEG–PVL–PLA nanoparticles exhibited the best combination of stability, encapsulation, and release properties. Our results demonstrate the ability to tune nanoparticle properties by modifying the polymeric architecture and composition. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2019, 57, 1322–1332     

Dendrimer‐star polymer and block copolymer prepared by reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization with dendritic chain transfer agent

A new reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent, dendritic polyester with 16 dithiobenzoate terminal groups, was prepared and used in the RAFT polymerization of styrene (St) to produce star polystyrene (PSt) with a dendrimer core. It was found that this polymerization was of living characters, the molecular weight of the dendrimer‐star polymers could be controlled and the polydispersities were narrow. The dendrimer‐star block copolymers of St and methyl acrylate (MA) were also prepared by the successive RAFT polymerization using the dendrimer‐star PSt as macro chain transfer agent. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 6379–6393, 2005     

Polyisobutylene-containing block polymers by sequential monomer addition. II. Polystyrene–polyisobutylene–polystyrene triblock polymers: Synthesis,characterization, and physical properties

New linear and three-arm star thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) comprising a rubbery polysobutylene (PIB) midblock flanked by glass polystyrene (PSt) blocks have been synthesized by living carbocationic polymerization in the presence of select additives by sequential monomer addition. First, isobutylene (IB) was polymerized by bi- and trifunctional tert-ether (dicumyl- and tricumyl methoxy) initiators in conjunction with TiCl₄ conintiator in CH₃Cl/methylcyclohexane (MeCHx) (40/60 v/v) solvent mixtures at ?80°C. After the living, narrow molecular weight, distribution PIB (M?_w/M?_n = 1.1-1.2) has reached the desired molecular weight, styrene (St) together with an electron pair donor (ED) and a proton trap (di-tert-butylpyridine, DtBP) were added to block PSt from the living chain ends. Uncontrolled initiation by protic impurities that produces PSt contamination is prevented by the use of DtBP. PSt-PIB-PSt blocks obtained in the absence of additives are contaminated by homopolymer and /or diblocks due to inefficient blocking and initiation by protic impurities, and exhibit poor physical properties. In contrast in the presence of the strong ED N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) and DtBP the blocking of St from living PIB chain occurs efficiently and block copolymers exhibiting good mechanical properties can be prepared. Virgin TPEs can be repeatedly compression molded without deterioration of physical properties. The products exhibit a low and a high temperature T_g characteristic of phase separated PIB and PSt domains. Transmission electron microscopy of linear triblocks containing ～ 34 wt % PSt also indicates microphase separation and suggests PSt rods dispersed in a PIB matrix.     

Macromolecular N-nitroso-acylamines as initiators for polyreactions. I. Synthesis of block copolymers from polycondensates and olefinic monomers,

The synthesis of block copolymers in three-step reactions from linear polycondensates (e.g., nylon 6. nylon 6,6, nylon 6,10 and polyurethane) and olefinic monomers (e.g., styrene, acrylic acid and acrylonitrile, methyl methacrylate, vinyl acetate, vinyl chloride, and isoprene) is reported. Macromolecular radicals are formed by the thermal decomposition of partly nitrosated peptide group containing polycondensates at elevated temperatures (60–200°C). These polyradicals initiate the copolymerization of the olefinic monomers. The conversion and reaction rates were generally high (up to 100% within a few hours). Most of the block copolymers prepared were soluble in organic solvents. Some, however, were insoluble or rubberlike. The reaction mechanism involved are analyzed. Applications are discussed.