Reactions of the Donor‐Stabilized Silylene Bis[N,N′‐diisopropyl‐benzamidinato(−)]silicon(II) with Brønsted Acids

Reaction of the donor‐stabilized silylene 1 (which is three‐coordinate in the solid state and four‐coordinate in solution) with [HMCp(CO)₃] (M=Mo, W; Cp=cyclopentadienyl) leads to the cationic five‐coordinate silicon(IV) complexes 2 and 3 , respectively, and reaction of 1 with CH₃COOH yields the neutral six‐coordinate silicon(IV) complex 4 . Compounds 2 – 4 were structurally characterized by crystal structure analyses and multinuclear NMR spectroscopic studies in the solid state and in solution. The formation of 2 – 4 can be formally described in terms of a Brønsted acid/base reaction, coupled with a redox process (Si^II→Si^IV, H⁺→H^?).     

Novel Transition‐Metal (M=Cr,Mo, W,Fe) Carbonyl Complexes with Bis(guanidinato)silicon(II) Ligands

The donor‐stabilized silylene 2 (the first bis(guanidinato)silicon(II ) complex) reacts with the transition‐metal carbonyl complexes [M(CO)₆] (M=Cr, Mo, W) to form the respective silylene complexes 7 – 10 . In the reactions with [M(CO)₆] (M=Cr, Mo, W), the bis(guanidinato)silicon(II ) complex 2 behaves totally different compared with the analogous bis(amidinato)silicon(II ) complex 1 , which reacts with [M(CO)₆] as a nucleophile to replace only one of the six carbonyl groups. In contrast, the reaction of 2 leads to the novel spirocyclic compounds 7 – 9 that contain a four‐membered SiN₂C ring and a five‐membered MSiN₂C ring with a M?Si and M?N bond (nucleophilic substitution of two carbonyl groups). Compounds 7 – 10 were characterized by elemental analyses (C, H, N), crystal structure analyses, and NMR spectroscopic studies in the solid state and in solution.     

Cationic Five‐Coordinate Bis(guanidinato)silicon(IV) Complexes with SiN4El Skeletons (El=S,Se): “Heterolytic Activation” of S−S and Se−Se Bonds

The donor‐stabilized silylene [iPrNC(NiPr₂)NiPr]₂Si ( 2 ) reacts with PhEl?ElPh (El=S, Se) to form the respective cationic five‐coordinate bis(guanidinato)silicon(IV) complexes {[iPrNC(NiPr₂)NiPr]₂SiSPh}⁺PhS^? ( 4 ) and {[iPrNC (NiPr₂)NiPr]₂SiSePh}⁺PhSe^? ( 5 ). Compounds 4 and 5 were characterized by crystal structure analyses and NMR spectroscopic studies in the solid state.     

Bis[N,N′‐diisopropylbenzamidinato(−)]silicon(II): Lewis Acid/Base Reactions with Triorganylboranes

Reaction of the donor‐stabilized silylene 1 (which is three‐coordinate in the solid state and four‐coordinate in solution) with BEt₃ and BPh₃ leads to the formation of the Lewis acid/base complexes 2 and 3 , respectively, which are the first five‐coordinate silicon compounds with an Si?B bond. These compounds were structurally characterized by crystal structure analyses and by multinuclear NMR spectroscopic studies in the solid state and in solution. Additionally, the bonding situation in 2 and 3 was analyzed by quantum chemical studies.     

Activation of Sulfur Dioxide by Bis[N,N′‐diisopropylbenzamidinato(−)]silicon(II): Synthesis of Neutral Six‐Coordinate Silicon(IV) Complexes with Chelating O,O′‐Sulfito or O,O′‐Dithionito Ligands

The neutral six‐coordinate silicon(IV) complexes 2 and 3 (mixture of cis‐ 3 and trans‐ 3 ) were synthesized by reaction of the donor‐stabilized silylene bis[N,N′‐diisopropylbenzamidinato(?)]silicon(II) ( 1 ) with SO₂. Compounds 2 and 3 are the first silicon(IV) complexes with chelating sulfito or dithionito ligands, and 3 is even the first molecular compound with a chelating dithionito ligand. Compounds 2 and 3 were structurally characterized by crystal structure analyses and multinuclear NMR spectroscopic studies in the solid state and in solution.     

Neutral Pentacoordinate Silicon(IV) Complexes with Silicon–Chalcogen (S,Se, Te) Bonds

The neutral pentacoordinate silicon(IV) complexes 1 (SiS₂ONC skeleton), 2 (SiSeSONC), 3 (SiTeSONC), 6 / 9 (SiSe₂O₂C), 7 (SiSe₂S₂C), and 8 / 10 (SiSe₄C) were synthesized and structurally characterized by using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and multinuclear solid‐state and solution‐state (except for 6 – 9 ) NMR spectroscopy. With the synthesis of compounds 1 – 3 and 6 – 10 , it has been demonstrated that pentacoordinate silicon compounds with soft chalcogen ligand atoms (S, Se, Te) can be stable in the solid state and in solution.     

Neutral Penta‐ and Hexacoordinate Silicon(IV) Complexes Containing Two Bidentate Ligands Derived from the α‐Amino Acids (S)‐Alanine, (S)‐Phenylalanine,and (S)‐tert‐Leucine

The neutral hexacoordinate silicon(IV) complex 6 (SiO₂N₄ skeleton) and the neutral pentacoordinate silicon(IV) complexes 7 – 11 (SiO₂N₂C skeletons) were synthesized from Si(NCO)₄ and RSi(NCO)₃ (R=Me, Ph), respectively. The compounds were structurally characterized by solid‐state NMR spectroscopy ( 6 – 11 ), solution NMR spectroscopy ( 6 and 10 ), and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction ( 8 and 11 were studied as the solvates 8? CH₃CN and 11? C₅H₁₂ ? 0.5 CH₃CN, respectively). The silicon(IV) complexes 6 (octahedral Si‐coordination polyhedron) and 7 – 11 (trigonal‐bipyramidal Si‐coordination polyhedra) each contain two bidentate ligands derived from an α‐amino acid: (S)‐alanine, (S)‐phenylalanine, or (S)‐tert‐leucine. The deprotonated amino acids act as monoanionic ( 6 ) or as mono‐ and dianionic ligands ( 7 – 11 ). The experimental investigations were complemented by computational studies of the stereoisomers of 6 and 7 .     

Synthesis,structure and properties of a new three‐dimensional interpenetrated metal–organic framework with 3,3′‐azodibenzoic acid (H2azdc) and 1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane (bimb): {[Cd(azdc)(bimb)2]·H2O}n

A new three‐dimensional interpenetrated Cd^II–organic framework based on 3,3′‐azodibenzoic acid [3,3′‐(diazenediyl)dibenzoic acid, H₂azdc] and the auxiliary flexible ligand 1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane (bimb), namely poly[[bis[μ₂‐1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane‐κ²N³:N^3′][μ₂‐3,3′‐(diazenediyl)dibenzoato‐κ²O:O′]cadmium(II)] monohydrate], {[Cd(C₁₄H₈N₂O₄)(C₁₀H₁₄N₂)₂]·H₂O}_n, (1), was obtained by a typical solution reaction in mixed solvents (water and N,N′‐dimethylformamide). Each Cd^II centre is six‐coordinated by two O atoms of bis‐monodentate bridging carboxylate groups from two azdc²⁻ ligands and by four N atoms from four bimb ligands, forming an octahedral coordination environment. The Cd^II ions are connected by the bimb ligands, resulting in two‐dimensional (4,4) layers, which are further pillared by the azdc²⁻ ligands, affording a threefold interpenetrated three‐dimensional α‐Po topological framework with the Schläfli symbol 4¹²6³. The thermal stability and solid‐state fluorescence properties of (1) have been investigated.     

Hydrothermal Syntheses,Crystal Structures,and Luminescent Properties of Three Organic‐Lanthanide Complexes with 3‐Hydroxycinnamic Acid

Three new homodinuclear lanthanide(III) complexes [Ln₂(L)₆(2,2′‐bipy)₂] [Ln = Tb^III ( 1 ), Sm^III ( 2 ), Eu^III ( 3 ); HL = 3‐hydroxycinnamic acid (3‐HCA); 2,2′‐bipy = 2,2′‐bipyridine] were synthesized and characterized by IR spectroscopy, elemental analyses, and X‐ray diffraction techniques. Complexes 1 – 3 crystallize in triclinic system, space group P$\bar{1}$ . In all complexes the lanthanide ions are nine‐coordinate by two nitrogen atoms from the 2,2′‐bipy ligand and seven oxygen atoms from one chelating L ligands and four bridging L ligands, forming distorted tricapped trigonal prismatic arrangements. The lanthanide(III) ions are intramolecularly bridged by eight carboxylate oxygen atoms forming dimeric complexes with Ln ··· Ln distances of 3.92747(15), 3.9664(6), and 3.9415(4) Å for complexes 1 – 3 , respectively. The luminescent properties in the solid state of HL ligand and Eu^III complex are also discussed.     

Coordination Adducts of Niobium(V) and Tantalum(V) Azide M(N3)5 (M=Nb,Ta) with Nitrogen Donor Ligands and their Self‐Ionization

Several new donor–acceptor adducts of niobium and tantalum pentaazide with N‐donor ligands have been prepared from the pentafluorides by fluoride–azide exchange with Me₃SiN₃ in the presence of the corresponding donor ligand. With 2,2′‐bipyridine and 1,10‐phenanthroline, the self‐ionization products [MF₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]⁻, [M(N₃)₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]⁻ and [M(N₃)₄(1,10‐phen)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]⁻ were obtained. With the donor ligands 3,3′‐bipyridine and 4,4′‐bipyridine the neutral pentaazide adducts (M(N₃)₅)₂⋅L (M=Nb, Ta; L=3,3′‐bipy, 4,4′‐bipy) were formed.     

Tetra­aqua(2,2′‐bi­pyridine)­nickel(II) terephthalate

The reaction of nickel(II) nitrate with terephthalic acid and 2,2′‐bi­pyridine in di­methyl­form­amide solution gives the title complex, [Ni(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₄](C₈H₄O₄). The Ni^II ion is octahedrally coordinated to one 2,2′‐bi­pyridine and four water mol­ecules and does not coordinate to the terephthalate anion. Hydro­gen bonds between the terephthalate anions and the [Ni(2,2′‐bipy)(H₂O)₄]²⁺ cations produce a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding architecture with double sheets.     

A one‐dimensional zinc(II) coordination polymer incorporating [1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate and N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide ligands

In the title compound, catena‐poly[[[N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide]chloridozinc(II)]‐μ‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxylato‐[[N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide]chloridozinc(II)]‐μ‐[N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide]], [Zn₂(C₁₄H₈O₄)Cl₂(C₂₆H₂₂N₄O₂)₃]_n, the Zn^II centre is four‐coordinate and approximately tetrahedral, bonding to one carboxylate O atom from a bidentate bridging dianionic [1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate ligand, to two pyridine N atoms from two N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide ligands and to one chloride ligand. The pyridyl ligands exhibit bidentate bridging and monodentate terminal coordination modes. The bidentate bridging pyridyl ligand and the bridging [1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate ligand both lie on special positions, with inversion centres at the mid‐points of their central C—C bonds. These bridging groups link the Zn^II centres into a one‐dimensional tape structure that propagates along the crystallographic b direction. The tapes are interlinked into a two‐dimensional layer in the ab plane through N—H...O hydrogen bonds between the monodentate ligands. In addition, the thermal stability and solid‐state photoluminescence properties of the title compound are reported.     

Synthese,Kristallstruktur und festkörper‐NMR‐spektroskopische Untersuchung neuer Oxonitridosilicate der Mischkristallreihe Ba4−xCaxSi6N10O

The new oxonitridosilicates Ba_4?xCa_xSi₆N₁₀O have been synthesized by means of high‐temperature synthesis in a radio‐frequency furnace, starting from calcium, barium, silicon diimide and amorphous silicon dioxide. The maximum reaction temperature was at about 1450 °C. The solid solution series Ba_4?xCa_xSi₆N₁₀O with a phase width 1.81 ≤ x ≤ 2.95 was obtained. The crystal structure of Ba_1.8Ca_2.2Si₆N₁₀O was determined by X‐ray single‐crystal structure determination (P2₁3, no. 198), a = 1040.2(1) pm, Z = 4, wR2 = 0.082). It can be described as a highly condensed network of corner‐sharing SiN₄ and SiON₃ tetrahedra, the voids of which are occupied by the alkaline earth ions. The structure is isotypic with that of BaEu(Ba_0.5Eu_0.5)YbSi₆N₁₁. In the ²⁹Si solid‐state MAS‐NMR spectrum two isotropic resonances at ?50.0 and ?53.6 ppm were observed.     

Coordination Adducts of Niobium(V) and Tantalum(V) Azide M(N3)5 (M=Nb,Ta) with Nitrogen Donor Ligands and their Self‐Ionization

Several new donor–acceptor adducts of niobium and tantalum pentaazide with N‐donor ligands have been prepared from the pentafluorides by fluoride–azide exchange with Me₃SiN₃ in the presence of the corresponding donor ligand. With 2,2′‐bipyridine and 1,10‐phenanthroline, the self‐ionization products [MF₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^?, [M(N₃)₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^? and [M(N₃)₄(1,10‐phen)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^? were obtained. With the donor ligands 3,3′‐bipyridine and 4,4′‐bipyridine the neutral pentaazide adducts (M(N₃)₅)₂?L (M=Nb, Ta; L=3,3′‐bipy, 4,4′‐bipy) were formed.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Photophysical Properties of the Di‐ and Trinuclear Phosphine‐Diimine Complexes of Copper(I)

Reactions of [Cu(NCMe)₄]⁺ with stoichiometric amount of diphosphine R₂P–(C₆H₄)_n–PR₂, (R = NC₄H₄, n = 1; R = Ph, n = 1, 2, 3) or tri‐phosphine 1, 3, 5‐(PPh₂–C₆H₄–)₃–C₆H₃ ligands give the corresponding di‐ or trinuclear copper(I) acetonitrile‐phosphine complexes 1 – 5 . Substitution of the labile acetonitrile groups with chelating aromatic diimines – 2, 2′‐bipyridine (bpy), 1, 10‐phenanthroline (phen), 5, 6‐dimethyl‐1, 10‐phenanthroline (dmp), 5, 6‐dibromo‐1, 10‐phenanthroline (phenBr₂) – gives the corresponding substituted compounds 6 – 16 . In all complexes 1 – 16 each central Cu^I atom has tetrahedral configuration completed with two N‐ and two P‐donor groups. The compounds obtained were characterized using elemental analysis, ESI‐MS, X‐ray crystallography, and NMR spectroscopy. All phosphine‐diimine compounds 6 – 16 are photoluminescent at room temperature both in dichloromethane solution and in solid state (λ_ex = 385 nm). In CH₂Cl₂ solution the maxima of emission bands are found in a range 540–640 nm, and in solid in a similar range 538–620 nm. Emission of 6 – 16 is assigned to the triplet excited state dominated by the charge transfer transitions with contribution of the MLCT character.     

Synthesis,Structural Characterization and Luminescence Studies of Di‐ and Trinuclear Gold(I) Alkynyl‐phosphine Complexes

Reactions of the polymer {Au^IC₂Ph}_n with polyphosphine ligands [1,4‐bis(2‐diphenylphosphino‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐benzene (dpib), 1,3,5‐tris(4‐diphenylphosphinophenyl)benzene (tppb), 2,2′‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)‐4,4′‐bipyridine (dpbp), and 3,6‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)pyridazine (dppz)] afforded four gold(I) alkynyl‐polyphosphine complexes [{AuC₂Ph}₂(μ‐dpib)] ( 1 ), [{AuC₂Ph}₃(μ₃‐tppb)] ( 2 ), [{AuC₂Ph}₂(μ‐dpbp)] ( 3 ), and [{AuC₂Ph}₂(μ‐dppz)] ( 4 ) in nearly quantitative yield. The compounds obtained were characterized using elemental analysis, ESI‐MS, X‐ray crystallography, and polynuclear NMR spectroscopy. Intermolecular aurophilic interaction together with π–π and σ–π stacking build up the supramolecular 3D network of complex 3 , whereas none of these intermolecular bondings were found in the crystal structures of compounds 1 , 2 , and 4 . Complexes 1 – 4 are luminescent both in solution (CH₂Cl₂) and in solid state under laser irradiation (λ_ex = 308 nm). In solution, the diphosphine complexes 1 – 4 display dual emission corresponding to ligand centered transitions (λ_em = 360–375 nm) along with weaker contribution from MLCT excited states at ca. 490 nm. The long wavelength component of the emission plays a dominant role in the solid state luminescence spectra of complexes 1 , 3 , and 4 (460, 544, 520 nm, respectively) whereas the triphosphine complex 2 shows dual luminescence (372 and 520 nm) with considerable contribution from ligand centered excited state.     

Construction of Mononuclear Copper(II) and Trinuclear Cobalt(II) Complexes Based on Asymmetric Salamo‐Type Ligands

Mononuclear copper(II) and trinuclear cobalt(II) complexes, namely [Cu(L¹)]₂ · CH₂Cl₂ and [{Co(L²)(EtOH)}₂Co(H₂O)] · EtOH {H₂L¹ = 4,6‐dichloro‐6′‐methyoxy‐2,2′‐[1,1′‐(ethylenedioxydinitrilo)dimethylidyne]diphenol and H₃L² = 6‐ethyoxy‐6′‐hydroxy‐2,2′‐[1,1′‐(ethylenedioxydinitrilo)dimethylidyne]diphenol}, were synthesized and characterized by elemental analyses, IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In the Cu^II complex, the Cu^II atom is four‐coordinate, with a N₂O₂ coordination sphere, and has a slightly distorted square‐planar arrangement. Interestingly, the obtained trinuclear Co^II complex is different from the common reported 2:3 (L:Co^II) salamo‐type Co^II complexes. Infinite 2D layer supramolecular structures are formed via abundant intermolecular hydrogen bonding and π ··· π stacking interactions in the Cu^II and Co^II complexes.     

Synthesis,X‐ray characterization and density functional theory studies of N6‐benzyl‐N6‐methyladenine–M(II) complexes (M = Zn,Cd): The prominent role of π–π, C–H···π and anion–π interactions

We report the synthesis and X‐ray characterization of the N⁶‐benzyl‐N⁶‐methyladenine ligand (L) and three metal complexes, namely [Zn(HL)Cl₃]·H₂O ( 1 ), [Cd(HL)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ) and [H₂L]₂[Cd₃(μ‐L)₂(μ‐Cl)₄Cl₆]·3H₂O ( 3 ). Complex 1 consists of the 7H‐adenine tautomer protonated at N3 and coordinated to a tetrahedral Zn(II) metal centre through N9. The octahedral Cd(II) in complex 2 is N⁹‐coordinated to two N⁶‐benzyl‐N⁶‐methyladeninium ligands (7H‐tautomer protonated at N3) that occupy apical positions and four chlorido ligands form the basal plane. Compound 3 corresponds to a trinuclear Cd(II) complex, where the central Cd atom is six‐coordinated to two bridging μ‐L and four bridging μ‐Cl ligands. The other two Cd atoms are six‐coordinated to three terminal chlorido ligands, to two bridging μ‐Cl ligands and to the bridging μ‐L through N3. Essentially, the coordination patterns, degree of protonation and tautomeric forms of the nucleobase dominate the solid‐state architectures of 1 – 3 . Additionally, the hydrogen‐bonding interactions produced by the endocyclic N atoms and NH groups stabilize high‐dimensional‐order supramolecular assemblies. Moreover, energetically strong anion–π and lone pair (lp)–π interactions are important in constructing the final solid‐state architectures in 1 – 3 . We have studied the non‐covalent interactions energetically using density functional theory calculations and rationalized the interactions using molecular electrostatic potential surfaces and Bader's theory of atoms in molecules. We have particularly analysed cooperative lp–π and anion–π interactions in 1 and π⁺–π⁺ interactions in 3 .     

Crystal Structures and Photoluminescence Properties of Zinc(II) and Cadmium(II) Coordination Polymers with “Y”‐Shaped Ligands

Three Zn^II and Cd^II complexes with Y‐shaped dicarboxylate ligands, namely [Zn(L₁)(2,2′‐bpy)₂(H₂O)] · 2H₂O ( 1 ), [Zn(L₁)(bpp)(H₂O)] ( 2 ), and [Cd(L₁)(H₂O)] · H₂O ( 3 ) [H₂L₁ = N‐phenyliminodiacetic acid, 2,2′‐bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, bpp = 1,3‐bis(4‐pyridyl)propane] were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analyses. Compound 1 shows an hydrogen‐bonded 2D network, whereas compound 2 is an infinite 1D wavy chain structure, though O–H ··· O hydrogen‐bonded to form a 2D network. Compound 3 displays a 2D uninodal 3‐connected Shubnikov plane net with the point symbol of (4.8²). Moreover, the solid‐state such as thermal stabilities and fluorescence properties of 1 – 3 were also investigated.