Mother and Child Emotions during Mathematics Homework

Mathematics is often thought of as a purely intellectual and unemotional activity. Recently, researchers have begun to question the validity of this approach, arguing that emotions and cognition are intertwined. The emotions expressed during mathematics work may be linked to mathematics achievement. We used behavioral measures to identify the emotions expressed by U.S. mothers and their 11-year-old children while solving pre-algebra tasks in the home. The most notable positive emotions displayed by mothers and children included positive interest, affection, joy, and pride, whereas the most notable negative emotions expressed included tension, frustration, and distress. Reflecting the social aspects of doing homework together, mothers' and children's emotions were highly correlated. Independent of pre-existing differences in knowledge, children's emotions were associated with their performance on a mathematics post-test: tension was linked to poorer performance while positive interest, humor, and pride were linked to better performance. We found no evidence of gender differences in the emotions while working the tasks, although boys responded with more tension following an incorrect solution than did girls.     

Notions of equivalence through ratios: Students with and without learning disabilities

Students with learning disabilities (LD) specific to mathematics historically underperform in foundational content such as rational number equivalence. This study examined the strategy usage and multiplicative thinking of three third grade children (i.e., Bill, a child identified as having a learning disability specific to mathematics, Carl, a child labeled as low achieving in mathematics, and Albert, a child labeled as typically achieving) before, during, and after participating in tutoring sessions consisting of student-centered pedagogy and equivalence tasks presented through an underutilized interpretation of rational number: namely, the ratio interpretation. Constant comparison analysis of the children's work during the tutoring sessions as well as responses to tasks during two clinical interviews seemed to indicate that all three children increased their use of viable strategies, with notable differences in the sophistication of the strategies as well as the level of multiplicative thinking utilized before and after the ratio-based tutoring sessions. Yet, Bill's continued use of rudimentary strategies reflects a need for continued research to investigate why the use of such strategies persists and how supporting the development of more sophisticated strategies (especially among children with LD) can be achieved.     

High school students' emotional experiences in mathematics classes

The aim of this qualitative research is to identify Mexican high school students' emotional experiences in mathematics classes. In order to obtain the data, focus group interviews were carried out with 22 students. The data analysis is based on the theory of the cognitive structure of emotions, which specifies the eliciting conditions for each emotion and the variables that affect the intensity of each emotion. The participant students' emotional experiences in mathematics classes are composed of: (1) satisfaction and disappointment while solving a problem; (2) joy or distress when taking a test; (3) fear and relief during classes; (4) pride and self-reproach during classes; and (5) boredom and interest during classes. Finally, we discuss how the theory of the cognitive structure of emotions and our analysis contribute to emotion research in mathematics education.     

Language Influence on Children's Cognitive Number Representation

This study examined the effect of language on children's cognitive representation of number. The sample for the study consisted of 90 Arabic speaking children with a mean age of 80 months. Children were interviewed individually and asked to represent written two‐digit numbers using base‐10 blocks. A new approach for testing the linguistic relativity hypothesis was used. The results of the study revealed that language played an important role in children's cognitive number representation. On the other hand, the results support the argument that the instructions given with the task alter children's performance on it. This study suggests that language may explain the cross‐cultural differences in mathematics achievement. However, the disadvantage that the language might place on children can be overcome with well‐planned instruction.     

Reflective Tutoring: Insights into Preservice Teacher Learning

An undergraduate seminar was designed to help preservice teachers focus on students' learning. Preservice teachers planned and conducted weekly tutoring sessions with fourth graders and discussed their experiences in weekly discussions. The author investigated what preservice teachers learned about teaching mathematics from their focus on students' learning of mathematics. The author examined the tasks that preservice teachers posed to children, the questions they asked of children, and the reflections they wrote about their experiences. The article describes what the preservice teachers learned from their experiences and provides insights into their knowledge and skills for developing children's mathematical power.     

Young children's recognition of quantitative relations in mathematically unspecified settings

Children have been found to be able to reason about quantitative relations, such as non-symbolic proportions, already by the age of 5 years. However, these studies utilize settings in which children were explicitly guided to notice the mathematical nature of the tasks. This study investigates children's spontaneous recognition of quantitative relations on mathematically unspecified settings. Participants were 86 Finnish-speaking children, ages 5–8. Two video-recorded tasks, in which participants were not guided to notice the mathematical aspects, were used. The tasks could be completed in a number of ways, including by matching quantitative relations, numerosity, or other aspects. Participants’ matching strategies were analyzed with regard to the most mathematically advanced level utilized. There were substantial differences in participants’ use of quantitative relations, numerosity and other aspects in their matching strategies. The results of this novel experimental setting show that investigating children's spontaneous recognition of quantitative relations provides novel insight into children's mathematical thinking and furthers the understanding of how children recognize and utilize mathematical aspects when not explicitly guided to do so.     

Mathematics in the home: Homework practices and mother-child interactions doing mathematics

Parents are a largely untapped resource for improving the mathematics performance of American children, which lags behind the performance of children from other nations. The purpose of the research reported here was to assess homework practices in the home, and to examine interactions between mothers and their 5th grade children as they worked challenging mathematics problems (pre-algebra equivalence problems). Results indicated that children spent on average 23 min per day on mathematics homework, with an average of 8 min of help from parents. Videotapes of mother-child interactions indicated that mothers varied considerably in the quality of the mathematics content that they conveyed while teaching, and in the quality of their scaffolding of the material for the child. As expected, mothers who themselves had more mathematics preparation performed better in conveying mathematical content and in scaffolding. Mothers with more mathematics self-confidence also performed better. The results suggest that children face inequities in the parental resources available to them for math learning; these inequities might be remedied by school-family partnership programs.     

Gender Equity in Mathematics: Beliefs of Students,Parents, and Teachers

The attitudes about mathematics held by girls and boys participating in a regional mathematics contest, their parents, teachers, and mathematics coaches were investigated. Quantitative data regarding mathematics as a male domain, perception of importance of mathematics, confidence in learning mathematics, effectance motivation, and usefulness of mathematics were obtained. It was found that the traditional gender‐based differences in the beliefs regarding mathematics persist even in these mathematically talented students. Furthermore, parents' responses to the questions regarding the role of mathematics revealed that mothers, more than fathers, focused on the computational aspects of mathematics, while fathers more than mothers mentioned the role of mathematics in science or as a language. Boys, fathers, and certain mathematics teachers admitted to a low level of gender stereotyping, as evidenced by their scores on the Mathematics as a Male Domain subscale. However, the girls, mothers, and mathematics coaches did not endorse this stereotyping. Unsolicited responses of girls and mothers, in fact, emphatically denied that gender stereotyping exists. These findings are discussed in terms of the need to resolve the essential conflicts between students', parents', and teachers' deeply held beliefs regarding the nature of mathematics, gender differences in mathematical abilities, and the desire for equity within mathematics education.     

Scientific Methodology and Elementary School Mathematics

Investigations provide an exciting and relevant background for the study of mathematics. In this article children's conceptions of the laws of motion, introduced by Eckstein and Shemesh (1993), are extended with an emphasis placed upon the benefits to mathematics education. The focus is on the principle that the faster an object is moving when it is dropped, the greater the distance it will travel away from the drop point. The problems faced by a class of elementary school children who focus upon this experiment are described, and the impact of these problems upon the decisions made by the class are discussed. The use of mathematics in support of this experiment, particularly concepts of probability and statistics, are discussed, as well as suggestions for alternative methods of evaluating children's performance.     

Teaching children to add and subtract

At a 1980 conference, leading mathematics educators synthesized previous knowledge on children's early understanding of addition and subtraction and proposed central parameters for future research in these areas form a cognitive science perspective. We have, since 1980, increased our knowledge about how children learn to add and subtract, but we need to know more about the best ways for teachers to guide children as they construct knowledge of addition and subtraction.In this article, we review several studies that focus on an enhanced role for teachers in enabling children to learn addition and subtraction. These studies describe efforts that have been made to teach children to use diagrams and mediational representations, number sentences, or algorithms and procedures. The studies report improvement in children's problem-solving performance, but the impact of the efforts described on children's conceptual understanding is less clear. Thus, we analyze this research, pose questions on the relationship of instruction to children's knowledge construction, and propose a research agenda that we believe will enable us to understand how teaching can best help children learn to add and subtract.     

Mathematical literacy in undergraduates: role of gender,emotional intelligence and emotional self-efficacy

This empirical study explores the roles that Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Emotional Self-Efficacy (ESE) play in undergraduates’ mathematical literacy, and the influence of EI and ESE on students’ attitudes towards and beliefs about mathematics. A convenience sample of 93 female and 82 male first-year undergraduates completed a test of mathematical literacy, followed by an online survey designed to measure the students’ EI, ESE and factors associated with mathematical literacy. Analysis of the data revealed significant gender differences. Males attained a higher mean test score than females and out-performed the females on most of the individual questions and the associated mathematical tasks. Overall, males expressed greater confidence in their mathematical skills, although both males’ and females’ confidence outweighed their actual mathematical proficiency. Correlation analyses revealed that males and females attaining higher mathematical literacy test scores were more confident and persistent, exhibited lower levels of mathematics anxiety and possessed higher mathematics qualifications. Correlation analyses also revealed that in male students, aspects of ESE were associated with beliefs concerning the learning of mathematics (i.e. that intelligence is malleable and that persistence can facilitate success), but not with confidence or actual performance. Both EI and ESE play a greater role with regard to test performance and attitudes/beliefs regarding mathematics amongst female undergraduates; higher EI and ESE scores were associated with higher test scores, while females exhibiting higher levels of ESE were also more confident and less anxious about mathematics, believed intelligence to be malleable, were more persistent and were learning goal oriented. Moderated regression analyses confirmed mathematics anxiety as a negative predictor of test performance in males and females, but also revealed that in females EI and ESE moderate the effects of anxiety on test performance, with the relationship between anxiety and test performance linked more to emotional management (EI) than to ESE.     

CHILDREN'S PROPORTIONAL REASONING AND TENDENCY FOR AN ADDITIVE STRATEGY: THE ROLE OF MODELS

In this paper we report on 10 –14 year old children's strategies while solving two versions of ratio and proportion tasks: one ‘with models’ thought to facilitate proportional reasoning and one ‘without’. Rasch methodology was used to develop ‘with’ and ‘without models’ test versions which were given to a linked sample involving 673 children. We examine the pupils’ additive errors, their effect on ratio reasoning and how contingent on ‘model’ presentation this is. First, we provide a single scale on which pupils, item-difficulty and additive errors can be located. We then provide a new scale constructed from the error prone items, which we name the ‘tendency for additive strategy’. The measurement data is supported by qualitative data showing that the presence of ‘models’ can sometimes affect children's strategies, both positively and negatively but rarely makes a significant measurement difference on this, untutored, sample.     

Family Mathematics Nights: An Opportunity to Improve Preservice Teachers' Understanding of Parents' Roles and Expectations

Providing preservice teachers with opportunities to engage with parents and begin to see them as collaborators in their children's education is a persistent challenge in mathematics methods courses and teacher preparation programs more broadly. We describe the use of family mathematics nights as a model for engaging parents and preservice teachers. These events helped preservice teachers feel more comfortable in working with parents, while also giving them a friendly space for learning more about parents, the ways they work with their children, and activities they do with their children. Incorporating surveys about parents' needs and suggestions for preservice teachers allowed us to use the results as a catalyst for fostering discussions around parent engagement later in the methods course.     

Paying the Price for "Sugar and Spice": Shifting the Analytical Lens in Equity Research

The analytical stance taken by equity researchers in education, the methodologies employed, and the interpretations that are drawn from data all have an enormous impact on the knowledge that is produced about sources of inequality. In the 1970s and 1980s, a great deal of interest was given to the issue of women's and girls' underachievement in mathematics. This prompted numerous different research projects that investigated the extent and nature of the differences between girls' and boys' achievement and offered reasons why such disparities occurred. This work contributed to a discourse on gender and mathematics that flowed through the media channels and into schools, homes, and the workplace. In this article, I consider some of the scholarship on gender and mathematics, critically examining the findings that were produced and the influence they had. In the process, I propose a fundamental tension in research on equity, as scholars walk a fine and precarious line between lack of concern on the one hand and essentialism on the other. I argue in this article that negotiating that tension may be the most critical role for equity researchers as we move into the future.     

Children's approaches to area measurement through different contexts

This study focuses on 12 years old children's approaches to area measurement in a project environment. These approaches are not explored through a specific set of mathematical tasks. The tasks, here, are defined through researchers' and children's interactions in a classroom. The children by working in small groups are asked to make a proposal about the location and the form of an area which would be given to them for their leisure activities. This environment defines different contexts where the children act and consider different aspects of the area measurement. These aspects are identified and compared among the three groups of children. The study has shown that the concept of area measurement carries different cultural dimensions for the children. Moreover, the children use those elements of the concept which fit in with their personal experience and the tasks they have to face.     

What does it mean to critique? An exploration of the types of critiques promoted in seventh-grade mathematics curriculum and assessment materials

While research in mathematics education has shown that mathematics assessments are highly consequential, traditional assessments often lag behind advancements in instructional methods. One such advancement is the promotion of mathematical habits of mind such as students' abilities to critique others' reasoning. This study explored the use of student work embedded in seventh-grade curriculum-based mathematics assessment tasks as a mechanism for critiquing others' thinking. The researcher investigated the prevalence and nature of student work in assessment tasks as compared to textbook tasks from five seventh-grade, Common Core State Standards for Mathematics-aligned curriculum series. The text analyses findings revealed that while there were multiple critique types in student work across both assessment and textbook tasks, there were substantial differences between students' opportunities to make sense of someone else's mathematical thinking in curriculum-based assessments as compared to the student textbooks. These findings reinforced prior curriculum and assessment research that found assessment often lags behind instructional methods.     

An Integrated Research on Children's Construction of Meaningful,Symbolic, Partitioning-related Conceptions and the Teacher's Role in Fostering That Learning

A teaching experiment was conducted with two fourth graders to study the co-emergence of teaching and children's construction of fraction knowledge. The children's learning, i.e., modifications in their fraction schemes, was fostered through working on tasks in a computer microworld. The children advanced from thinking about a unit fraction as one of several equal parts in a whole (the equipartitioning scheme) to operating with a unit fraction as a symbolized, iterable part the magnitude of which is based on the numerosity of the partitioned whole (the partitive fraction scheme). The paper interweaves an analysis of children's construction of partitioning-related symbolic conceptions of fractions with an analysis of the teaching—planning and using tasks—that fosters such an advancement by introducing fraction words and numerals in the context of the children's partitioning activities.     

Picture Books as an Impetus for Kindergartners' Mathematical Thinking

Although there is evidence that the use of picture books affects young children's achievement scores in mathematics, little is known about the cognitive engagement and, in particular, the mathematical thinking that is evoked when young children are read a picture book. The focus of the case study reported in this article is on the cognitive engagement that is facilitated by the picture books themselves and not on how this engagement is prompted by a reader. The book under investigation, Vijfde zijn [Being Fifth], is a picture book of high literary quality that was not written for the purpose of teaching mathematics. The story is about a doctor's waiting room and touches on backwards counting and spatial orientation only tacitly as part of the narrative. Four 5 year olds were each read the book by one of the authors without any questioning or probing. The reading sessions took place in school, outside the classroom. A detailed coding framework was developed for analyzing the children's utterances that provided an in-depth picture of the children's spontaneous cognitive engagement. Surprisingly, almost half the utterances were mathematics-related. The findings of the study support the idea that reading children picture books without explicit instruction or prompting has large potential for mathematically engaging children.     

Changing Children's Conceptions of Burning

Relatively few studies have examined the effects of instruction on children's understanding of burning. This study focused on three questions: (a) What are children's views of burning prior to and after instruction? (b) Do children's views become more scientific, that is, more in accord with scientists' views, with instruction, and if so, how? (c) Are the changes in children's understanding of burning correlated to their ages? Data were collected before and after five hours of instruction in a Saturday Science Program, using both a short multiple choice test based on common misconceptions from the literature and "interviews about events." Children were divided into two classes according to their grade in school. A significant difference was found in children's understanding before and after instruction on the multiple‐choice test that was corroborated with interview data. Younger children (ages 8 to 11) made more significant gains than did the older children (ages 11 to 13), with both groups reaching similar levels of understanding after instruction. Although notable gains were made in recognizing the need for oxygen in burning and in distinguishing between decomposition and burning, interviews revealed that few children at any age could explain specifically what was happening on the phenomena level.