Connections and confusion: teaching perimeter and area with a problem-solving oriented unit

Problem-solving-oriented mathematics curricula are viewed as important vehicles to help achieve K-12 mathematics education reform goals. Although mathematics curriculum projects are currently underway to develop such materials, little is known about how teachers actually use problem-solving-oriented curricula in their classrooms. This article profiles a middle-school mathematics teacher and examines her use of two problems from a pilot version of a sixth-grade unit developed by a mathematics curriculum project. The teacher's use of the two problems reveals that although problem-solving-oriented curricula can be used to yield rich opportunities for problem solving and making mathematical connections, such materials can also provide sites for student confusion and uncertainty. Examination of this variance suggests that further attention should be devoted to learning about teachers' use of problem-solving-oriented mathematics curricula. Such inquiry could inform the increasing development and use of problem-solving-oriented curricula.     

The relationship between preservice elementary teachers’ solutions to a pattern generalization problem and difficulties they anticipate in teaching it

To explore the relationship between elementary preservice teachers’ (PTs’) solutions to a pattern generalization problem and the difficulties they expected to encounter when teaching the same problem to students, we administered a task-based questionnaire to 154 participants at a large Southwestern university in the US. Employing inductive content analysis, we identified possible links between PTs' solutions and their anticipated difficulties. PTs who solved the problem using figurative reasoning tended to anticipate difficulties related to pedagogical moves to support students’ mathematical understanding. In contrast, PTs who solved the problem using algebraic formulations were likely to anticipate difficulties related to teaching algebraic knowledge and supporting procedural fluency. Also, only PTs who solved the problem using figurative reasoning anticipated difficulties associated with eliciting and evaluating student thinking, whereas PTs who used formulas to solve the problem expected difficulties related to their own self-efficacy and confidence. We discuss three implications for mathematics teacher education.     

Beyond realistic considerations: modeling conceptions and controls in task examples with simple word problems

Using simple word problems, we analyze possible teacher conceptions on the process of problem solving, its goals and the choices that a problem solver can make in problem mathematization. We identify several possible teacher conceptions that would be responsible for the different didactical contracts that teachers create in the mathematics class. Using especially chosen and designed task examples, we demonstrate the diagnosis of teacher own controls in solving problems and in evaluating problem solutions. We also discuss characteristics of task examples that might promote a shift from a problem solving perspective to a modeling perspective that goes beyond merely accepting alternative solutions due to realistic considerations. This shift in perspective would be exhibited through a new understanding of the process of fitting mathematical models in problem situations.     

Are middle school mathematics teachers able to solve word problems without using variable?

Many people consider problem solving as a complex process in which variables such as x,?y are used. Problems may not be solved by only using ‘variable.’ Problem solving can be rationalized and made easier using practical strategies. When especially the development of children at younger ages is considered, it is obvious that mathematics teachers should solve problems through concrete processes. In this context, middle school mathematics teachers' skills to solve word problems without using variables were examined in the current study. Through the case study method, this study was conducted with 60 middle school mathematics teachers who have different professional experiences in five provinces in Turkey. A test consisting of five open-ended word problems was used as the data collection tool. The content analysis technique was used to analyze the data. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the most of the teachers used trial-and-error strategy or area model as the solution strategy. On the other hand, the teachers who solved the problems using variables such as x, a, n or symbols such as Δ, □, ○, * and who also felt into error by considering these solutions as without variable were also seen in the study.     

Journey toward Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving

Teaching mathematics through problem solving is a challenge for teachers who learned mathematics by doing exercises. How do teachers develop their own problem solving abilities as well as their abilities to teach mathematics through problem solving? A group of teachers began the journey of learning to teach through problem solving while taking a Teaching Elementary School Mathematics graduate course. This course was designed to engage teachers in problem solving during class meetings and required them to do problem solving action research in their classrooms. Although challenged by the course problem solving work, teachers became more comfortable with the mathematics and recognized the importance of group work while problem solving. As they worked with their students, teachers were more confident in their students' abilities to be successful problem solvers. For some teachers, a strong problem solving foundation was established. For others, the foundation was more tentative.     

Prospective teachers anticipate challenges fostering the mathematical practice of making sense

Problem solving has long been a priority in mathematics education, and the first Common Core mathematical practice (SMP1) focuses on this priority through the language of “Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.” We present findings from a survey about how prospective elementary teachers' (PTs) make sense of potential difficulties with fostering SMP1. Findings suggested that PTs' common anticipated difficulties relate to planning a solution pathway and self monitoring whether the solution makes sense. Moreover, a third of PTs disclosed that their anticipated difficulties are linked to their own personal struggles with aspects of SMP1. An alternative interpretation of SMP1 surfaced in which a small number of PTs described SMP1 as necessitating that a teacher teach multiple solution methods to students, instead of engaging students in productive struggle to develop their own strategies. We present a framework illustrating the connections between SMP 1 and Pólya's problem solving phases, and we discuss how these findings connect to and build on previous research of PTs' experiences with problem solving. We offer implications for the targeted support needed in teacher preparation programs to address these struggles, to prevent them from being replicated in their students.     

Engaging in problem posing activities in a dynamic geometry setting and the development of prospective teachers’ mathematical knowledge

In the present study we explore changes in perceptions of our class of prospective mathematics teachers (PTs) regarding their mathematical knowledge. The PTs engaged in problem posing activities in geometry, using the “What If Not?” (WIN) strategy, as part of their work on computerized inquiry-based activities. Data received from the PTs’ portfolios reveals that they believe that engaging in the inquiry-based activity enhanced both their mathematical and meta-mathematical knowledge. As to the mathematical knowledge, they deepened their knowledge regarding the geometrical concepts and shapes involved, and during the process of creating the problem and checking its validity and its solution, they deepened their understanding of the interconnections among the concepts and shapes involved. As to meta-mathematical knowledge, the PTs refer to aspects such as the meaning of the givens and their relations, validity of an argument, the importance and usefulness of the definitions of concepts and objects, and the importance of providing a formal proof.     

Obstacles and challenges in preservice teachers’ explorations with fractions: A view from a small-scale intervention study

In this study, we implemented one-on-one fractions instruction to eight preservice teachers. The intervention, which was based on the principle of Progressive Formalization (Freudenthal, 1983), was centered on problem solving and on progressively formalizing the participants’ intuitive knowledge of fractions. The objectives of the study were to examine the potential effects of the intervention and to uncover specific difficulties experienced by the preservice teachers during instruction. Results revealed improvement on one measure of conceptual knowledge, but not on a transfer task, which required the teachers to generate word problems for number sentences involving fractions. In addition, the qualitative analysis of the videotaped instructional sessions revealed a number of cognitive obstacles encountered by the participants as they attempted to construct meaningful solutions and represent those solutions symbolically. Based on the findings, specific suggestions for modifying the intervention are provided for mathematics teacher educators.     

How students use the ‘see similar example’ feature in online mathematics homework

Homework is one of students’ opportunities to learn mathematics, but we know little about what students learn from homework. This study employs the instructional triangle and didactic contract to explore how students used the ‘see similar example’ feature in an online homework platform and how that use reflected their learning goals. Findings indicate students used similar examples to troubleshoot, to check if they were on the right track, and to see the form of the answer. Students also sought to unpack the reasoning in solution steps, used solutions as templates for solving their own problems, and sometimes copied answers. One student did a ‘see similar example’ problem for more practice. Students’ goals included completing the homework, maximizing their score, and understanding the content. This research lays groundwork for future work characterizing what students learn from homework and how features that provide students with similar examples help or hinder their learning.     

High school students' use of representations in physics problem solving

Findings from physics education research strongly point to the critical need for teachers’ use of multiple representations in their instructional practices such as pictures, diagrams, written explanations, and mathematical expressions to enhance students' problem‐solving ability. In this study, we explored use of problem‐solving tasks for generating multiple representations as a scaffolding strategy in a high school modeling physics class. Through problem‐solving cognitive interviews with students, we investigated how a group of students responded to the tasks and how their use of such strategies affected their problem‐solving performance and use of representations as compared to students who did not receive explicit, scaffolded guidance to generate representations in solving similar problems. Aggregated data on students' problem‐solving performance and use of representations were collected from a set of 14 mechanics problems and triangulated with cognitive interviews. A higher percentage of students from the scaffolding group constructed visual representations in their problem‐solving solutions, while their use of other representations and problem‐solving performance did not differ with that of the comparison group. In addition, interviews revealed that students did not think that writing down physics concepts was necessary despite being encouraged to do so as a support strategy.     

Exploring the Role of Individual and Socially Constructed Knowledge Mobilization Tasks in Revealing Preservice Elementary Teachers' Understandings of a Triangle Fraction Task

This study compares the effectiveness of two forms of a knowledge mobilization task on preservice elementary teachers' (n= 65) performance in solving a triangle fraction problem. The study then identifies the source of the successful solutions by linking solutions to earlier activities. One group worked with the triangle fraction task individually; a second worked with the triangle fraction task in a social constructivist setting; a control group had no knowledge mobilization pretask. Although there was no significant difference in the frequency of successful solutions among treatment groups, a chi‐square analysis found that the social‐constructivist pretask group applied fewer ideas from the manipulative lessons as solutions to the posttask than did the comparison groups. The social constructivist group was, however, most successful at generating novel solutions to the triangle problem. The potential benefits of individual and socially constructed knowledge mobilization tasks are discussed.     

Values in preservice mathematics teachers’ discussions of the Body Mass Index - A critical perspective

This article explores the values that come to the fore when preservice mathematics teachers (PTs) ¹ engage in critical discussions about the role of mathematical models in society. The specific model that was discussed was the Body Mass Index (BMI) ². From the analysis of the PTs’ discussions of the BMI from a mathematical and societal point of view several mathematical and mathematics educational values were identified such as openness, rationalism, progress, reasoning, evaluating, and problematizing the instrumental understanding of mathematics. In addition, critical thinking about mathematics in society as emphasized in curricula in the three countries involved in the study, was identified with four categories of complementary pairs. Knowing the mathematical and mathematics educational values underpinning PTs’ discussions and their connection to critical thinking is important for successfully engaging with the role of mathematics in society.     

High‐School Students' Approaches to Solving Algebra Problems that are Posed Symbolically: Results from an Interview Study

A cross‐curricular structured‐probe task‐based clinical interview study with 44 pairs of third year high‐school mathematics students, most of whom were high achieving, was conducted to investigate their approaches to a variety of algebra problems. This paper presents results from three problems that were posed in symbolic form. Two problems are TIMSS items (a linear inequality and an equation involving square roots). The other problem involves square roots. We found that the majority of student pairs used symbol manipulation when solving the problems, and while many students seemed to prefer symbolic over graphical and tabular representations in their first attempt at solving the problems, we found that it was common for student pairs to use more than one strategy throughout the course of their solving. Students' use of graphing calculators to solve the problems is discussed.     

Mediated action in teachers’ discussions about mathematics tasks

This paper presents analyses of teachers?? discussions within mathematics teaching developmental research projects, taking mediation as the central construct. The relations in the so-called ??didactic triangle?? form the basic framework for the analysis of two episodes in which upper secondary school teachers discuss and prepare tasks for classroom use. The analysis leads to the suggestion that the focus on tasks places an emphasis on the task as object and its resolution as goal; mathematics has the role of a mediating artefact. Subject content in the didactic triangle is thus displaced by the task and learning mathematics may be relegated to a subordinate position.     

Preservice Teachers' Use of Multiple Representations In Solving Arithmetic Mean Problems

The development of preservice teachers' views of various mathematical concepts involves building a repertoire of flexible representations of the concepts they teach. In this study, science and mathematics preservice teachers (n = 19) were asked to solve graphical and numerical problems involving the arithmetic mean and to provide two different solutions for each problem. Background information about the preservice teachers was obtained, including subject area specialty, type of statistics courses previously taken, type of science laboratory courses previously taken, and prior experience with real data outside the classroom. In solving the problems, some participants presented two different methods: algorithmic computation and balancing deviations about the mean. A significant difference was found between science and mathematics preservice teachers in the use of balancing deviations to solve the problems but not in the use of the computational algorithm.     

Mix It Up: Teachers' Beliefs on Mixing Mathematics and Science

This paper defines correlation, describes the Mix It Up program, discusses the teachers' beliefs about the value of correlating mathematics and science prior to program participation, and identifies problems teachers associated with correlation before and during the program. Teachers' beliefs about the value of correlation and about the problems associated with correlation are based on results from both quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate the program. Results indicate that teachers believe correlating mathematics and science strengthens students' content knowledge in mathematics and science, bridges the gap between mathematics and science, enhances motivation, and increases students' flexibility in problem solving. Additionally, the areas identified by teachers to be most problematic were time, planning for instruction as a team, and exposure to correlation in the past. The most important finding from the program evaluation indicates that although teachers did not identify content knowledge weaknesses before participating in the program, they did recognize gaps in their own content knowledge during program participation, and more importantly they made connections among these gaps, classroom instruction, and their own students' performance in mathematics and science.     

Learning cycles for mathematics: An investigative approach to middle-school mathematics

Middle-school-aged students are a complex mixture of often conflictive social, intellectual, and physical ingredients while middle-school mathematics content becomes increasingly abstract and procedure driven. Preparation for algebra and higher mathematics often ignores the developmental and social needs of the middle-school student while overemphasizing computational facility with previously learned elementary mathematics content. The need to explore and question will be encouraged by a classroom atmosphere and instructional strategies that provide for active problem solving and cooperative group learning. This article articulates the philosophical and research bases forlearning cycle pedagogy which, when applied to mathematics teaching, is especially appropriate for the special needs of the middle-school student. The components of, and theoretical/research bases for, the learning cycle are described. Learning cycle pedagogy is the embodiment of the vision of mathematics classroom instruction depicted in the Standards (NCTM, 1989).     

Multipurpose Professional Growth Sequence: The catwalk problem as a paradigmatic example

An important concern in mathematics teacher education is how to create learning opportunities for prospective and practicing teachers that make a difference in their professional growth as educators. The first purpose of this article is to describe one way of working with prospective and practicing teachers in a graduate mathematics education course that holds promise for positively influencing the way teachers think about mathematics, about student learning, and about mathematics teaching. Specifically, I use the “catwalk” task as an example of how a single problem can serve as the basis for a coherent sequence of professional learning experiences. A second purpose of this article is to provide background information that contextualizes the subsequent two articles, each of which details the positive influence of the catwalk task sequence on the authors’ professional growth.