首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Let ( L , Γ ) $(\mathfrak {L},\Gamma )$ be an isometric boundary pair associated with a closed symmetric linear relation T in a Krein space H $\mathfrak {H}$ . Let M Γ $M_\Gamma$ be the Weyl family corresponding to ( L , Γ ) $(\mathfrak {L},\Gamma )$ . We cope with two main topics. First, since M Γ $M_\Gamma$ need not be (generalized) Nevanlinna, the characterization of the closure and the adjoint of a linear relation M Γ ( z ) $M_\Gamma (z)$ , for some z C R $z\in \mathbb {C}\setminus \mathbb {R}$ , becomes a nontrivial task. Regarding M Γ ( z ) $M_\Gamma (z)$ as the (Shmul'yan) transform of z I $zI$ induced by Γ, we give conditions for the equality in M Γ ( z ) ¯ M Γ ¯ ( z ) ¯ $\overline{M_\Gamma (z)}\subseteq \overline{M_{\overline{\Gamma }}(z)}$ to hold and we compute the adjoint M Γ ¯ ( z ) $M_{\overline{\Gamma }}(z)^*$ . As an application, we ask when the resolvent set of the main transform associated with a unitary boundary pair for T + $T^+$ is nonempty. Based on the criterion for the closeness of M Γ ( z ) $M_\Gamma (z)$ , we give a sufficient condition for the answer. From this result it follows, for example, that, if T is a standard linear relation in a Pontryagin space, then the Weyl family M Γ $M_\Gamma$ corresponding to a boundary relation Γ for T + $T^+$ is a generalized Nevanlinna family; a similar conclusion is already known if T is an operator. In the second topic, we characterize the transformed boundary pair ( L , Γ ) $(\mathfrak {L}^\prime ,\Gamma ^\prime )$ with its Weyl family M Γ $M_{\Gamma ^\prime }$ . The transformation scheme is either Γ = Γ V 1 $\Gamma ^\prime =\Gamma V^{-1}$ or Γ = V Γ $\Gamma ^\prime =V\Gamma$ with suitable linear relations V. Results in this direction include but are not limited to: a 1-1 correspondence between ( L , Γ ) $(\mathfrak {L},\Gamma )$ and ( L , Γ ) $(\mathfrak {L}^\prime ,\Gamma ^\prime )$ ; the formula for M Γ M Γ $M_{\Gamma ^\prime }-M_\Gamma$ , for an ordinary boundary triple and a standard unitary operator V (first scheme); construction of a quasi boundary triple from an isometric boundary triple ( L , Γ 0 , Γ 1 ) $(\mathfrak {L},\Gamma _0,\Gamma _1)$ with ker Γ = T $\ker \Gamma =T$ and T 0 = T 0 $T_0=T^*_0$ (second scheme, Hilbert space case).  相似文献   

15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Necessary and sufficient conditions are given for the boundedness of Hausdorff operators on the generalized Hardy spaces H E p ( G ) $H^p_E(G)$ , real Hardy space H R 1 ( G ) $H^1_{\mathbb {R}}(G)$ , BMO ( G ) $\text{BMO}(G)$ , and BMOA ( G ) $\text{BMOA}(G)$ for compact Abelian group G. Surprisingly, these conditions turned out to be the same for all groups and spaces under consideration. Applications to Dirichlet series are given. The case of the space of continuous functions on G and examples are also considered.  相似文献   

20.
We show that U ( k ) $U(k)$ -invariant hypercomplex structures on (open subsets) of regular semisimple adjoint orbits in g l ( k , C ) ${\mathfrak {g} \mathfrak {l}}(k,{\mathbb {C}})$ correspond to algebraic curves C of genus ( k 1 ) 2 $(k-1)^2$ , equipped with a flat projection π : C P 1 $\pi :C\rightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1$ of degree k, and an antiholomorphic involution σ : C C $\sigma :C\rightarrow C$ covering the antipodal map on P 1 ${\mathbb {P}}^1$ .  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号