Lanthanoidkomplexe von 1‐(2‐Propenyl)‐ und 1‐(3‐Butenyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecan‐4,7,10‐triessigsäure

η³‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane molybdenum tricarbonyl reacts with allyl bromide and 3‐butenyl bromide in dimethylformamide in the presence of K₂CO₃ yielding 1‐(2‐propenyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane ( 1a ) and 1‐(3‐butenyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane ( 1b ), which on their part react with bromoacetic acid tert‐butyl ester in CH₃CN to give 1‐(2‐propenyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐4,7,10‐tris‐acetic acid tert‐butyl ester ( 2a ) and 1‐(3‐butenyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐4,7,10‐tris‐acetic acid tert‐butyl ester ( 2b ), respectively. Compounds 2a and 2b are converted into the corresponding acids 1‐(2‐propenyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐4,7,10‐tris‐acetic acid ( 4a ) (MPC) and 1‐(3‐butenyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐4,7,10‐tris‐acetic acid ( 4b ) (MBC) via the trifluoroacetates 3a and 3b . Sm(NO₃)₃(H₂O)₆, LuCl₃(THF)₃, and TmCl₃(H₂O)₆ react with 4a and 4b forming the lanthanide complexes Sm(MPC) ( 5 ), Lu(MPC) ( 6 ), Tm(MPC) ( 7a ) and Tm(MBC) ( 7b ). The IR as well as the ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra of the new compounds are reported and discussed.     

Herstellung von 1,2,4‐Trithiolan‐, 1,2,4,5‐Tetrathian‐ sowie 1,2,3,5,6‐Pentathiepan‐S‐oxiden und deren Reaktionen mit (Ph3P)2Pt(η2‐C2H4). Kristallstrukturanalyse von 3,3,5,5‐Tetraphenyl‐1,2,4‐trithiolan‐1‐oxid

Metal Complexes of Functionalized Sulfur‐containing Ligands. XVII Synthesis of S ‐Oxides of 1,2,4‐Trithiolane, 1,2,4,5‐Tetrathiane as well as 1,2,3,5,6‐Pentathiepane, and their Reactions with (Ph₃P)₂Pt(η²‐C₂H₄). X‐Ray Structure Analysis of 3,3,5,5‐Tetraphenyl‐1,2,4‐trithiolane 1‐oxide 3,3,5,5‐Tetraphenyl‐1,2,4‐trithiolan ( 1 ) was oxidized using m‐chloroperbenzoic acid to give, selectively, the 3,3,5,5‐tetraphenyl‐1,2,4‐trithiolane 1‐oxide ( 2 ). 2 was characterized structurally. The reaction of octamethyl tetrathiadispiro[3.2.3.2]dodecane‐2,9‐dione ( 3 ) with trifluoroperacetic acid at –50 °C yielded the corresponding 5‐oxide 4 . Oxidation of octamethyl pentathiadispiro[3.3.3.2]tridecane‐2,9‐dione ( 5 ) with m‐chloroperbenzoic acid at 0 °C gave the 12‐oxide 6 . Treatment of 2 with two equivalents of (Ph₃P)₂Pt(η²‐C₂H₄) ( 7 ) afforded a mixture (1 : 1) of the complexes (Ph₃P)₂PtSCPh₂S ( 8 ) and (Ph₃P)₂Pt(η²‐Ph₂C=S=O) ( 9 ), respectively.     

Isocyanate‐ and Isothiocyanate‐Derived RuIV‐Based Alkylidenes: Synthesis,Structure, and Activity

The synthesis and characterization of a series of isocyanate‐ and isothiocyanate‐derived second generation Grubbs–Hoveyda‐type ruthenium–alkylidene complexes, that is, [Ru(N?C?O)₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 1 ), [Ru(N?C?O)₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(=CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 2 ), [Ru(N?C?S)₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 3 ), and [Ru(N?C?S)₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 4 ), and their activity in various metathesis reactions are described. Compounds 1 – 4 were prepared by reaction of the parent complexes [RuCl₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)C₆H₄)] ( 5 ) (IMesH₂=1,3‐bis‐(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydroimidazol‐2‐ylidene) and [RuCl₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 6 ) with silver cyanate and thiocyanate, respectively. The X‐ray structure of 1 was determined, confirming the isocyanate‐type bonding of the ligand. The isothiocyanate‐type bonding in 3 and 4 was unambiguously confirmed by IR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The isocyanate‐derived complexes 1 and 2 were found to be excellent catalysts for the ring‐opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of cis‐cycloocta‐1,5‐diene (COD). Both 1 and 2 yielded poly(COD) with a trans‐content of about 80 %. First‐order kinetics with unprecedentedly high rate constants of polymerization (k_p=0.068 and 0.26 s^?1, respectively) were observed. Compounds 3 and 4 were also active initiators for the ROMP of COD, however, they generated poly(COD) with a cis‐content of 80 and 67 %, respectively. Complexes 1 and 2 also showed good catalytic activity in cross‐metathesis (CM) reactions. Finally, 1 – 4 were also found to be excellent catalysts for the regioselective cyclopolymerization of diethyl 2,2‐dipropargylmalonate (DEDPM), resulting in poly(DEDPM) almost entirely based on five‐membered repeat units, that is, cyclopent‐1‐ene‐1,2‐vinylenes.     

The Synthesis of B2(SIDip)2 and its Reactivity Between the Diboracumulenic and Diborynic Extremes

A new compound with the formula L‐B₂‐L wherein the stabilizing ligand (L) is 1,3‐bis[diisopropylphenyl]‐4,5‐dihydroimidazol‐2‐ylidene (SIDip) has been synthesized, isolated, and characterized. The π‐acidity of the SIDip ligand, intermediate between the relatively non‐acidic IDip (1,3‐bis[diisopropylphenyl]imidazol‐2‐ylidene) ligand and the much more highly acidic CAAC (1‐[2,6‐diisopropylphenyl]‐3,3,5,5‐tetramethylpyrrolidin‐2‐ylidene) ligand, gives rise to a compound with spectroscopic, electrochemical, and structural properties between those of L‐B₂‐L compounds stabilized by CAAC and IDip. Reactions of all three L‐B₂‐L compounds with CO demonstrate the differences caused by their respective ligands, as the π‐acidities of the CAAC and SIDip carbenes enabled the isolation of bis(boraketene) compounds (L(OC)B‐B(CO)L), which could not be isolated from reactions with B₂(IDip)₂. However, only B₂(IDip)₂ and B₂(SIDip)₂ could be converted into bicyclic bis(boralactone) compounds.     

Novel dinuclear and trinuclear ruthenium clusters derived from 2‐aryl‐substituted indenylphosphines via C─H bond cleavage

Treatment of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ with an equivalent of (2‐phenyl‐1H ‐inden‐3‐yl)dicyclohexylphosphine ( 1 ) and (2‐pyridyl‐1H ‐inden‐1‐yl)dicyclohexylphosphine ( 4 ) in refluxing heptane gave the novel trinuclear ruthenium clusters (μ₃‐η¹:η²:η⁵–2‐phenyl‐3‐Cy₂PC₉H₄)Ru₃(CO)₈ ( 1c ) and [μ₂‐η¹–2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐3‐Cy₂PC₉H₆]Ru₃(CO)₉ ( 4a ), respectively, via C ─ H bond cleavage. (2‐Mesityl‐1H ‐inden‐3‐yl)dicyclohexylphosphine ( 2 ) reacted with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in refluxing heptane to give the trinuclear ruthenium cluster [μ‐2‐mesityl‐(3‐Cy₂PC₉H₅)](μ₂‐CO)Ru₃(CO)₉ ( 2c ) via C ─ H bond cleavage and carbonyl insertion. 2‐(Anthracen‐9‐yl)‐1H –inden‐3‐yldicyclohexylphosphine ( 3 ) reacted with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in refluxing heptane to give the dinuclear ruthenium cluster [μ₂‐η³:η³–2‐(anthracen‐9‐yl)‐3‐Cy₂PC₉H₆]Ru₂(CO)₅ ( 3a ). The structures of 1c , 2c , 3a and 4a were fully characterized using IR and NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. These results suggest that the 2‐aryl substituent on the indenyl ring has a pronounced effect on the reaction and coordination modes of Ru₃(CO)₁₂.     

Tin(II) Halide Insertion or Halogen Exchange in the Reactions of Dihaloplatinum(II) Complexes with Tin(II) Halide

Reactions of SnCl₂ with the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf (1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene), dppp (1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane=1,1′‐(propane‐1,3‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppb (1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane=1,1′‐(butane‐1,4‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), and dpppe (1,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)pentane=1,1′‐(pentane‐1,5‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine])) resulted in the insertion of SnCl₂ into the Pt? Cl bond to afford the cis‐[PtCl(SnCl₃)(P₂)] complexes. However, the reaction of the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf, dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane=1,1′‐methylenebis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppe (1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane=1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppp, dppb, and dpppe; P=Ph₃P and (MeO)₃P) with SnX₂ (X=Br or I) resulted in the halogen exchange to yield the complexes [PtX₂(P₂)]. In contrast, treatment of cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)] with SnBr₂ resulted in the insertion of SnBr₂ into the Pt? Br bond to form cis‐[Pt(SnBr₃)₂(dppm)], and this product was in equilibrium with the starting complex cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)]. Moreover, the reaction of cis‐[PtCl₂(dppb)] with a mixture SnCl₂/SnI₂ in a 2 : 1 mol ratio resulted in the formation of cis‐[PtI₂(dppb)] as a consequence of the selective halogen‐exchange reaction. ³¹P‐NMR Data for all complexes are reported, and a correlation between the chemical shifts and the coupling constants was established for mono‐ and bis(trichlorostannyl)platinum complexes. The effect of the alkane chain length of the ligand and Sn^II halide is described.     

乙烯基锡修饰的双吡唑甲烷第六族金属羰基化合物的合成与反应

通过双吡唑基甲基锂与二苯基乙烯基碘化锡的反应, 合成了桥头碳上带有乙烯基锡修饰的双吡唑甲烷配体。在回流的THF中这些乙烯基锡修饰的双吡唑甲烷配体(R3SnCHPz2, R3Sn为三乙烯基锡或二苯基乙烯基锡;Pz代表取代吡唑)与M(CO)5THF (M = Mo或W)反应产生杂双金属化合物R3SnCHPz2M(CO)3。在这些化合物中,一个乙烯基以h2方式配位到金属钼或钨上,双吡唑甲烷表现为一个三齿k3-(p,N,N)配体。(CH2=CH)3SnCH(3,5-Me2Pz)2W(CO)3和Ph2(CH2=CH)SnCH(3,5-Me2Pz)2W(CO)3与I2的反应也被研究。前者给出化合物CH2(3,5-Me2Pz)2W(CO)4,而后者随着有机锡的丢失产生四元金属杂环化合物CH(3,5-Me2Pz)2W(CO)3I。用PhSNa处理该四元金属杂环化合物导致碘负离子被取代,得到化合物CH(3,5-Me2Pz)2W(CO)3SPh。     

Surprisingly Different Reaction Behavior of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metal Bis(trimethylsilyl)amides toward Bulky N‐(2‐Pyridylethyl)‐N′‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)pivalamidine

N‐(2,6‐Diisopropylphenyl)‐N′‐(2‐pyridylethyl)pivalamidine (Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)‐C₂H₄‐Py) ( 1 ), reacts with metalation reagents of lithium, magnesium, calcium, and strontium to give the corresponding pivalamidinates [(tmeda)Li{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}] ( 6 ), [Mg{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}₂] ( 3 ), and heteroleptic [{(Me₃Si)₂N}Ae{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}], with Ae being Ca ( 2 a ) and Sr ( 2 b ). In contrast to this straightforward deprotonation of the amidine units, the reaction of 1 with the bis(trimethylsilyl)amides of sodium or potassium unexpectedly leads to a β‐metalation and an immediate deamidation reaction yielding [(thf)₂Na{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}] ( 4 a ) or [(thf)₂K{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}] ( 4 b ), respectively, as well as 2‐vinylpyridine in both cases. The lithium derivative shows a similar reaction behavior to the alkaline earth metal congeners, underlining the diagonal relationship in the periodic table. Protonation of 4 a or the metathesis reaction of 4 b with CaI₂ in tetrahydrofuran yields N‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)pivalamidine (Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐NH₂) ( 5 ), or [(thf)₄Ca{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}₂] ( 7 ), respectively. The reaction of AN(SiMe₃)₂ (A=Na, K) with less bulky formamidine Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N(H)‐C₂H₄‐Py ( 8 ) leads to deprotonation of the amidine functionality, and [(thf)Na{Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}]₂ ( 9 a ) or [(thf)K{Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}]₂ ( 9 b ), respectively, are isolated as dinuclear complexes. From these experiments it is obvious, that β‐metalation/deamidation of N‐(2‐pyridylethyl)amidines requires bases with soft metal ions and also steric pressure. The isomeric forms of all compounds are verified by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis and are maintained in solution.     

Dihydrooxazolones and dihydroimidazolones derived from acylglycines: syntheses,molecular structures and supramolecular assembly

Syntheses and structures are described for some alkylidene‐substituted dihydrooxazolones and dihydroimidazoles derived from simple acylglycines. A second, triclinic, polymorph of 4‐benzylidene‐2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1,3‐oxazol‐5(4H)‐one, C₁₇H₁₃NO₂, (I), has been identified and the structure of 2‐methyl‐4‐[(thiophen‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐1,3‐oxazol‐5(4H)‐one, C₉H₇NO₂S, (II), has been rerefined taking into account the orientational disorder of the thienyl group in each of the two independent molecules. The reactions of phenylhydrazine with 2‐phenyl‐4‐[(thiophen‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐1,3‐oxazol‐5(4H)‐one or 2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐4‐[(thiophen‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐1,3‐oxazol‐5(4H)‐one yield, respectively, 3‐anilino‐2‐phenyl‐5‐[(thiophen‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐3,5‐dihydro‐4H‐imidazol‐4‐one, C₁₀H₁₅N₃OS, (III), and 3‐anilino‐2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐[(thiophen‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐3,5‐dihydro‐4H‐imidazol‐4‐one, C₂₁H₁₇N₃OS, (IV), which both exhibit orientational disorder in their thienyl groups. The reactions of 2‐phenyl‐4‐[(thiophen‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐1,3‐oxazol‐5(4H)‐one with hydrazine hydrate or with water yield, respectively, N‐[3‐hydrazinyl‐3‐oxo‐1‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)prop‐1‐en‐2‐yl]benzamide and 2‐(benzoylamino)‐3‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)prop‐2‐enoic acid, which in turn react, respectively, with thiophene‐2‐carbaldehyde to form 2‐phenyl‐5‐[(thiophen‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐3‐{[(E)‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)methylidene]amino}‐3,5‐dihydro‐4H‐imidazol‐4‐one, C₁₉H₁₃N₃OS₂, (V), which exhibits orientational disorder in only one of its thienyl groups, and with methanol to give methyl (2Z)‐2‐(benzoylamino)‐3‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)prop‐2‐enoate, C₁₅H₁₃NO₃S, (VI). There are no direction‐specific intermolecular interactions in the crystal structure of the triclinic polymorph of (I), but the molecules of (II) are linked by two independent C—H...O hydrogen bonds to form C₂²(14) chains. Compounds (III) and (IV) both form centrosymmetric R₂²(10) dimers built from N—H...O hydrogen bonds, while compound (V) forms a centrosymmetric R₂²(10) dimer built from C—H...O hydrogen bonds. In the structure of compound (VI), a combination of N—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds links the molecules into sheets. Comparisons are made with some similar compounds.     

Synthesis and structures of six closely related N‐[3‐(2‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5‐ethylthiophen‐2‐yl]arylamides,together with an isolated reaction intermediate: order versus disorder,molecular conformations and hydrogen bonding in zero,one and two dimensions

Six closely related N‐[3‐(2‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5‐ethylthiophen‐2‐yl]arylamides have been synthesized and structurally characterized, together with a representative reaction intermediate. In each of N‐[3‐(2‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5‐ethylthiophen‐2‐yl]benzamide, C₂₀H₁₆ClNO₂S, (I), N‐[3‐(2‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5‐ethylthiophen‐2‐yl]‐4‐phenylbenzamide, C₂₆H₂₀ClNO₂S, (II), and 2‐bromo‐N‐[3‐(2‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5‐ethylthiophen‐2‐yl]benzamide, C₂₀H₁₅BrClNO₂S, (III), the molecules are disordered over two sets of atomic sites, with occupancies of 0.894 (8) and 0.106 (8) in (I), 0.832 (5) and 0.168 (5) in (II), and 0.7006 (12) and 0.2994 (12) in (III). In each of N‐[3‐(2‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5‐ethylthiophen‐2‐yl]‐2‐iodobenzamide, C₂₀H₁₅ClINO₂S, (IV), and N‐[3‐(2‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5‐ethylthiophen‐2‐yl]‐2‐methoxybenzamide, C₂₁H₁₈ClNO₃S, (V), the molecules are fully ordered, but in N‐[3‐(2‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5‐ethylthiophen‐2‐yl]‐2,6‐difluorobenzamide, C₂₀H₁₄ClF₂NO₂S, (VI), which crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in the space group C2/c, one of the two independent molecules is fully ordered, while the other is disordered over two sets of atomic sites having occupancies of 0.916 (3) and 0.084 (3). All of the molecules in compounds (I)–(VI) exhibit an intramolecular N—H…O hydrogen bond. The molecules of (I) and (VI) are linked by C—H…O hydrogen bonds to form finite zero‐dimensional dimers, which are cyclic in (I) and acyclic in (VI), those of (III) are linked by C—H…π(arene) hydrogen bonds to form simple chains, and those of (IV) and (V) are linked into different types of chains of rings, built in each case from a combination of C—H…O and C—H…π(arene) hydrogen bonds. Two C—H…O hydrogen bonds link the molecules of (II) into sheets containing three types of ring. In benzotriazol‐1‐yl 3,4‐dimethoxybenzoate, C₁₅H₁₃N₃O₄, (VII), the benzoate component is planar and makes a dihedral angle of 84.51 (6)° with the benzotriazole unit. Comparisons are made with related compounds.     

Chromium-silicon multiple bonds: the chemistry of terminal N-heterocyclic-carbene-stabilized halosilylidyne ligands

An efficient method for the synthesis of the first N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC)‐stabilized halosilylidyne complexes is reported that starts from SiBr₄. In the first step, SiBr₄ was treated with one equivalent of the N‐heterocyclic carbene 1,3‐bis[2,6‐bis(isopropyl)phenyl]imidazolidin‐2‐ylidene (SIdipp) to give the 4,5‐dihydroimidazolium salt [SiBr₃(SIdipp)]Br ( 1‐Br ), which then was reduced with potassium graphite to afford the silicon(II) dibromide–NHC adduct SiBr₂(SIdipp) ( 2‐Br ) in good yields. Heating 2‐Br with Li[CpCr(CO)₃] afforded the complex [Cp(CO)₂Cr?SiBr(SIdipp)] ( 3‐Br ) upon elimination of CO. Complex 3‐Br features a trigonal‐planar‐coordinated silicon center and a very short Cr?Si double bond. Similarly, the reaction of SiCl₂(SIdipp) ( 2‐Cl ) with Li[CpCr(CO)₃] gave the analogous chloro derivative [Cp(CO)₂Cr?SiCl(SIdipp)] ( 3‐Cl ). Complex 3‐Br undergoes an NHC exchange with 1,3‐dihydro‐4,5‐dimethyl‐1,3‐bis(isopropyl)‐2H‐imidazol‐2‐ylidene (IMe₂iPr₂) to give the complex [Cp(CO)₂CrSiBr(IMe₂iPr₂)₂] ( 4‐Br ). Compound 4‐Br features a distorted‐tetrahedral four‐coordinate silicon center. Bromide abstraction occurs readily from 4‐Br with Li[B(C₆F₅)₄] to give the putative silylidene complex salt [Cp(CO)₂Cr?Si(IMe₂iPr₂)₂][B(C₆F₅)₄], which irreversibly dimerizes by means of an Si‐promoted electrophilic activation of one carbonyl oxygen atom to yield the dinuclear siloxycarbyne complex [Cp(CO)Cr{(μ‐CO)Si(IMe₂iPr₂)₂}₂‐ Cr(CO)Cp][B(C₆F₅)₄]₂ ( 5 ). All compounds were fully characterized, and the molecular structures of 2‐Br – 5‐Br were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. DFT calculations of 3‐Br and 3‐Cl and their carbene dissociation products [Cp(CO)₂Cr?Si? X] (X=Cl, Br) were carried out, and the electronic structures of 3‐Br , 3‐Cl and [Cp(CO)₂Cr?Si? X] were analyzed by the natural bond orbital method in combination with natural resonance theory.     

Thiol‐responsive micelles based on nonionic gemini surfactants with a cystine disulfide spacer

Thiol‐responsive micelles consisting of novel nonionic gemini surfactants with a cystine disulfide spacer are reported. The gemini surfactants, (C₁₈‐Cys‐mPEG)₂ and ((C₁₈)₂‐Lys‐Cys‐mPEG)₂, were synthesized from polyethylene glycol, cysteine, and stearic acid, and their structures were confirmed by ¹H NMR and gel permeation chromatography. (C₁₈‐Cys‐mPEG)₂ and ((C₁₈)₂‐Lys‐Cys‐mPEG)₂ formed micelles with average diameters of 13 and 22 nm above the critical micelle concentration of 6.5 and 4.7 µg mL^?1, respectively. The micelles of ((C₁₈)₂‐Lys‐Cys‐mPEG)₂ containing more stearoyl groups showed encapsulated more hydrophobic indomethacin (IMC) with higher entrapment efficiencies than those of (C₁₈‐Cys‐mPEG)₂. The gemini surfactant micelles exhibited an accelerated release of encapsulated IMC with the concentration of the reducing agent, glutathione (GSH), whereas they were unaffected by the presence of reduced GSH (GSSG). The 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐5‐(3‐carboxymethoxyphenyl)?2‐(4‐sulfophenyl)?2H‐tetrazolium studies revealed the noncytotoxic nature of the gemini surfactant micelles. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 582–589     

Avoiding Carbothermal Reduction: Distillation of Alkoxysilanes from Biogenic,Green, and Sustainable Sources

The direct depolymerization of SiO₂ to distillable alkoxysilanes has been explored repeatedly without success for 85 years as an alternative to carbothermal reduction (1900 °C) to Si_met, followed by treatment with ROH. We report herein the base‐catalyzed depolymerization of SiO₂ with diols to form distillable spirocyclic alkoxysilanes and Si(OEt)₄. Thus, 2‐methyl‐2,4‐pentanediol, 2,2,4‐trimethyl‐1,3‐pentanediol, or ethylene glycol (EGH₂) react with silica sources, such as rice hull ash, in the presence of NaOH (10 %) to form H₂O and distillable spirocyclic alkoxysilanes [bis(2‐methyl‐2,4‐pentanediolato) silicate, bis(2,2,4‐trimethyl‐1,3‐pentanediolato) silicate or Si(eg)₂ polymer with 5–98 % conversion, as governed by surface area/crystallinity. Si(eg)₂ or bis(2‐methyl‐2,4‐pentanediolato) silicate reacted with EtOH and catalytic acid to give Si(OEt)₄ in 60 % yield, thus providing inexpensive routes to high‐purity precipitated or fumed silica and compounds with single Si−C bonds.     

Avoiding Carbothermal Reduction: Distillation of Alkoxysilanes from Biogenic,Green, and Sustainable Sources

The direct depolymerization of SiO₂ to distillable alkoxysilanes has been explored repeatedly without success for 85 years as an alternative to carbothermal reduction (1900 °C) to Si_met, followed by treatment with ROH. We report herein the base‐catalyzed depolymerization of SiO₂ with diols to form distillable spirocyclic alkoxysilanes and Si(OEt)₄. Thus, 2‐methyl‐2,4‐pentanediol, 2,2,4‐trimethyl‐1,3‐pentanediol, or ethylene glycol (EGH₂) react with silica sources, such as rice hull ash, in the presence of NaOH (10 %) to form H₂O and distillable spirocyclic alkoxysilanes [bis(2‐methyl‐2,4‐pentanediolato) silicate, bis(2,2,4‐trimethyl‐1,3‐pentanediolato) silicate or Si(eg)₂ polymer with 5–98 % conversion, as governed by surface area/crystallinity. Si(eg)₂ or bis(2‐methyl‐2,4‐pentanediolato) silicate reacted with EtOH and catalytic acid to give Si(OEt)₄ in 60 % yield, thus providing inexpensive routes to high‐purity precipitated or fumed silica and compounds with single Si?C bonds.     

Synthesis,characterization, and fluorescence of pyrene‐containing eight‐arm star‐shaped dendrimer‐like copolymer with pentaerythritol core

Novel and well‐defined pyrene‐containing eight‐arm star‐shaped dendrimer‐like copolymers were successfully achieved by combination of esterification, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), divergent reaction, ring‐opening polymerization (ROP), and coupling reaction on the basis of pentaerythritol. The reaction of pentaerythritol with 2‐bromopropionyl bromide permitted ATRP of styrene (St) to form four‐arm star‐shaped polymer (PSt‐Br)₄. The molecular weights of these polymers could be adjusted by the variation of monomer conversion. Eight‐hydroxyl star‐shaped polymer (PSt‐(OH)₂)₄ was produced by the divergent reaction of (PSt‐Br)₄ with diethanolamine. (PSt‐(OH)₂)₄ was used as the initiator for ROP of ε‐caprolactone (CL) to produce eight‐arm star‐shaped dendrimer‐like copolymer (PSt‐b‐(PCL)₂)₄. The molecular weights of (PSt‐b‐(PCL)₂)₄ increased linearly with the increase of monomer. After the coupling reaction of hydroxyl‐terminated (PSt‐b‐(PCL)₂)₄ with 1‐pyrenebutyric acid, pyrene‐containing eight‐arm star‐shaped dendrimer‐like copolymer (PSt‐b‐(PCL‐pyrene)₂)₄ was obtained. The eight‐arm star‐shaped dendrimer‐like copolymers presented unique thermal properties and crystalline morphologies, which were different from those of linear poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL). Fluorescence analysis indicated that (PSt‐b‐(PCL‐pyrene)₂)₄ presented slightly stronger fluorescence intensity than 1‐pyrenebutyric acid when the pyrene concentration of them was the same. The obtained pyrene‐containing eight‐arm star‐shaped dendrimer‐like copolymer has potential applications in biological fluorescent probe, photodynamic therapy, and optoelectronic devices. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 2788–2798, 2008     

Synthesis of porphyrin‐end‐functionalized polycyclohexane with well‐controlled and defined polymer chain structure

Tetraphenylporphyrin‐end‐functionalized polycyclohexane (H₂TPP‐PCHE) and its metal complexes (MTPP‐PCHE) were synthesized as the first successful example of porphyrin‐end‐functionalized transparent and stable polymers with a well‐controlled and defined polymer chain structure. Chloromethyl‐end‐functionalized poly(1,3‐cyclohexadiene) (CM‐PCHD) was synthesized as prerequisite prepolymer by the postpolymerization reaction of poly(1,3‐cyclohexadienyl)lithium and chloro(chloromethyl)dimethylsilane. CM‐end‐functionalized PCHE (CM‐PCHE) was prepared by the complete hydrogenation of CM‐PCHD with p‐toluenesulfonyl hydrazide. H₂TPP was incorporated onto the polymer chain end by the addition of 5‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐10,15,20‐triphenylporphyrin to CM‐PCHE. The complexation of H₂TPP‐PCHE and Zn(OAc)₂ (or PtCl₂) yielded a zinc (or platinum) complex of H₂TPP‐PCHE. H₂TPP‐PCHE and MTPP‐PCHE were readily soluble in common organic solvents, and PCHE did not inhibit the optical properties of the H₂TPP, ZnTPP, and PtTPP end groups. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Synthesis of inverse star block copolymer by combination of ATRP,ring opening polymerization,and “click chemistry”

The inverse star block copolymer, (poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐b‐polystyrene)₂‐core‐(poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐b‐polystyrene)₂, [(PCL‐PS)₂‐core‐(PCL‐PS)₂] has been successfully prepared by combination of atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), ring opening polymerization (ROP), and “Click Chemistry.” The synthesis includes the following five steps: (1) synthesis of a heterofunctional initiator with two ATRP initiating groups and two hydroxyl groups; (2) formation of (Br‐PS)₂‐core‐(OH)₂ via ATRP of styrene; (3) preparation of the (PCL‐PS)₂‐core‐(OH)₂ through “click” reaction of the α‐propargyl, ω‐acetyl terminated PCL with (N₃‐PS)₂‐core‐(OH)₂ which was prepared by transformation of the terminal bromine groups in (Br‐PS)₂‐core‐(OH)₂ into azide groups; (4) the ROP of CL using (PCL‐PS)₂‐core‐(OH)₂ as macroinitiator to form (PCL‐PS)₂‐core‐(PCL‐OH)₂; and (5) preparation of the (PCL‐PS)₂‐core‐(PCL‐PS)₂ through the ATRP of styrene using (PCL‐PS)₂‐core‐(PCL‐Br)₂ as macroinitiator which was prepared by reaction of the terminal hydroxyl groups at the end of the PCL chains with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. The characterization data support structures of the inverse star block copolymer and the intermediates. The differential scanning calorimeter results and polarized optical microscope observation showed that the intricate structure of the inverse star block copolymer greatly restricted the movement of the PS segments and PCL segments, resulted in the increase of the glass transition temperature of PS segments and the decrease of crystallization ability of PCL segments. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 7757–7772, 2008     

Synthesis and NMR Characterization of Multi‐hydroxyl End‐groups PEG and PLGA‐PEG Barbell‐like Copolymers

Multi‐hydroxyl end‐groups poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) was prepared from PEG and epichlorohydrin. Then, PEG‐supported poly(lactic‐ran‐glycolic acid) (PLGA)_n‐PEG‐(PLGA)_n (n=1, 2, 4) linear‐dendritic barbell‐like copolymers were synthesized through direct polycondensation under bulk condition from the multi‐hydroxyl end‐groups PEG, lactic acid and glycolic acid. Arm numbers were varied, with 2, 4 and 8, by using bis‐, tetra‐, and octa‐hydroxyl end‐groups PEG, respectively. The chemical structures, absolute number‐average molecular weight, the monomer units per single arm and the molar ratio of hydroxyl acid monomer units of the (PLGA)_n‐PEG‐(PLGA)_n barbell‐like copolymers were analyzed by NMR spectroscopy. The result indicated that the structures of the multi‐hydroxyl end‐groups PEG and (PLGA)_n‐PEG‐(PLGA)_n barbell‐like copolymers were consistent with design. Compared with the theoretical values, molecular weights determined by ¹H‐NMR end‐group analysis gave reasonably consistent values, but the values determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) were considerably less than theoretical values. The results indicated that (PLGA)_n‐PEG‐(PLGA)_n copolymers have linear‐dendritic structures.     

Synthesis of Fe3O4 Microspheres-Supported Catalysts for Suzuki Coupling Reaction

Two new Fe₃O₄ microspheres‐supported semi‐homogeneous catalysts, namely Fe₃O₄‐G4‐polyaminoamido (PAMAM) dendrimers‐Pd(0) and Fe₃O₄‐polyethylene glycols (PEGs)‐Pd(0) were synthesized and characterized by X‐ray powder diffraction, infrared spectrum, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and thermal gravimetric analysis, which can catalyze Suzuki coupling reactions. The performance of catalysts was tested for the reactions of aryl halides with phenyl boronic acid and compared with a heterogeneous catalyst Fe₃O₄‐(3‐aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTS)‐Pd(0), in which Fe₃O₄‐G4‐PAMAM dendrimers‐Pd(0) shows the best activity among the three catalysts. The order of the catalytic activities is Fe₃O₄‐G4‐PAMAM dendrimers‐Pd(0)>Fe₃O₄‐PEGs‐Pd(0)>Fe₃O₄‐APTS‐Pd(0). The catalysts can be quickly and completely recovered by simply applying a magnet of 105 mT and the efficiencies remain unaltered even after four recycles.     

Zur Reaktion der Alkin‐Kupfer(I)‐Komplexe [CuCl(S‐Alkin)] und [Cu2Br2(S‐Alkin)(dms)] (S‐Alkin = 3,3,6,6‐Tetramethyl‐1‐thia‐4‐cycloheptin,dms = Dimethylsulfid) mit den Lithiumorganylen Phenyllithium und Fluorenyllithium

Organometallic Compounds of Copper. XX On the Reaction of the Alkyne Copper(I) Complexes [CuCl(S‐Alkyne)] and [Cu₂Br₂(S‐Alkyne)(dms)] (S‐Alkyne = 3,3,6,6‐Tetramethyl‐1‐thiacyclohept‐4‐yne; dms = Dimethylsulfide) with the Lithiumorganyls Phenyllithium und Fluorenyllithium The alkyne copper(I) bromide complex [Cu₂Br₂(S‐Alkyne)(dms)] ( 3 b ) (S‐Alkyne = 3,3,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐thiacyclohept‐4‐yne; dms = dimethylsulfide) reacts with phenyllithium to form a tetranuclear copper(I) complex of the composition [Cu₄(C₆H₅)₂(S‐Alkenyl)₂] ( 7 ) in low yield (4%). The reaction of the alkyne copper(I) chloride complex [CuCl(S‐Alkyne)] ( 2 a ) with fluorenyllithium in tetrahydrofuran (thf) affords a lithium cuprate of the composition [Li(thf)₄]⁺ [Cu₂(fluorenyl)₃(S‐Alkyne)₂]^– ( 8 ) (yield 32%). The structures of both new complexes 7 and 8 were determined by X–ray diffraction.