Charge exchange and charge separation processes of [C3Hn]2+ and [C3Dn]2+ (n = 1–6) dications

The charge exchange and charge separation processes of a series of [C₃H_n]²⁺ and [C₃D_n]²⁺ (n = 1–6) dications have been investigated experimentally in a mass spectrometer of reversed geometry. The relative reaction cross-sections for charge exchange with nitrogen exhibited a 20-fold variation which has implications for the interpretation of 2E spectra with respect to dication relative intensities. Charge separation resulting in deprotonation was observed for all [C₃D_n]²⁺ species investigated, while de-deuteronation was observed for [C₃D_n]²⁺ (n = 1–4) only. Intercharge separations calculated from the observed ion kinetic energies released upon charge separation suggest linear structures for [C₃D_n]²⁺ and [C₃D_n]²⁺ (n = 1–2) and cyclic structures for [C₃D_n]²⁺ (n = 3–6) and [C₃D_n]²⁺ (n = 3–4).     

Activation of Aryl and Heteroaryl Halides by an Iron(I) Complex Generated in the Reduction of [Fe(acac)3] by PhMgBr: Electron Transfer versus Oxidative Addition

The mechanism of the reactions of aryl/heteroaryl halides with aryl Grignard reagents catalyzed by [Fe^III(acac)₃] (acac=acetylacetonate) has been investigated. It is shown that in the presence of excess PhMgBr, [Fe^III(acac)₃] affords two reduced complexes: [PhFe^II(acac)(thf)_n] (n=1 or 2) (characterized by ¹H NMR and cyclic voltammetry) and [PhFe^I(acac)(thf)]^? (characterized by cyclic voltammetry, ¹H NMR, EPR and DFT). Whereas [PhFe^II(acac)(thf)_n] does not react with any of the investigated aryl or heteroaryl halides, the Fe^I complex [PhFe^I(acac)(thf)]^? reacts with ArX (Ar=Ph, 4‐tolyl; X=I, Br) through an inner‐sphere monoelectronic reduction (promoted by halogen bonding) to afford the corresponding arene ArH together with the Grignard homocoupling product PhPh. In contrast, [PhFe^I(acac)(thf)]^? reacts with a heteroaryl chloride (2‐chloropyridine) to afford the cross‐coupling product (2‐phenylpyridine) through an oxidative addition/reductive elimination sequence. The mechanism of the reaction of [PhFe^I(acac)(thf)]^? with the aryl and heteroaryl halides has been explored on the basis of DFT calculations.     

Strukturelle Vielfalt im pseudo‐ternären System M/Ge/I: α‐[NMe(nBu)3](GeI4)I, β‐[NMe(nBu)3](GeI4)I und [ImMe(nBu)][N(nBu)4](GeI4)3I2

By reaction of GeI₄, [N(nBu)₄]I as iodide donor, and [NMe(nBu)₃][N(Tf)₂] as ionic liquid, reddish‐black, plate‐like shaped crystals are obtained. X‐ray diffraction analysis of single crystals resulted in the compositions ;alpha;‐[NMe(nBu)₃](GeI₄)I (Pbca; a = 1495.4(3) pm; b = 1940.6(4) pm; c = 3643.2(7) pm; Z = 16) and β‐[NMe(nBu)₃](GeI₄)I (Pn; a = 1141.5(2) pm; b = 953.6(2) pm; c = 1208.9(2) pm; β = 100.8(1)°; Z = 2). Depending on the reaction temperature, the one or other compound is formed selectively. In addition, the reaction of GeI₄ and [N(nBu)₄]I, using [ImMe(nBu)][BF₄] (Im = imidazole) as ionic liquid, resulted in the crystallization of [ImMe(nBu)][N(nBu)₄](GeI₄)₃I₂ (P2₁/c; a = 1641.2(3) pm; b = 1903.0(4) pm; c = 1867.7(4) pm; β = 92.0(1)°; Z = 4). The anionic network of all three compounds is established by molecular germanium(IV)iodide, which is bridged by iodide anions. The different connectivity of (GeI₄–I^–) networks is attributed to the flexibility of I^– regarding its coordination and bond length. Here, a [3+1]‐, 4‐ and 5‐fold coordination is first observed in the pseudo‐ternary system M/Ge/I (M: cation).     

Binding of Cu+ and Cu2+ with peptides: Peptides = oxytocin,Arg8‐vasopressin,bradykinin, angiotensin‐I,substance‐P,somatostatin, and neurotensin

The intrinsic binding ability of 7 natural peptides (oxytocin, arg⁸‐vasopressin, bradykinin, angiotensin‐I, substance‐P, somatostatin, and neurotensin) with copper in 2 different oxidation states (Cu^I/II) derived from different Cu^+/2+ precursor sources have been investigated for their charge‐dependent binding characteristics. The peptide‐Cu^I/II complexes, [M − (n‐1)H + nCu^I] and [M − (2n‐1)H + nCu^II], are prepared/generated by the reaction of peptides with CuI solution/Cu‐target and CuSO₄ solution and are analyzed by using matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry. The MALDI mass spectra of both [M − (n‐1)H + nCu^I] and [M − (2n‐1)H + nCu^II] complexes show no mass shift due to the loss of ─H atoms in the main chain ─NH of these peptides by Cu⁺ and Cu²⁺ deprotonation. The measured m/z value indicates the reduction of Cu^I/II oxidation state into Cu⁰ during MALDI processes. The number and relative abundance of Cu⁺ bound to the peptides are greater compared with the Cu²⁺ bound peptides. Oxytocin, arg⁸‐vasopressin, bradykinin, substance‐P, and somatostatin show the binding of 5Cu⁺, and angiotensin‐I and neurotensin show the binding of 7Cu⁺ from both CuI and Cu targets, while bradykinin shows the binding of 2Cu²⁺, oxytocin, arg⁸‐vasopressin, angiotensin‐I, and substance‐P; somatostatin shows the binding of 3Cu²⁺; and neurotensin shows 4Cu²⁺ binding. The binding of more Cu⁺ with these small peptides signifies that the bonding characteristics of both Cu⁺ and Cu²⁺ are different. The amino acid residues responsible for the binding of both Cu⁺ and Cu²⁺ in these peptides have been identified based on the density functional theory computed binding energy values of Cu⁺ and the fragment transformation method predicted binding preference of Cu²⁺ for individual amino acids.     

Poly[tetraamminecopper(II) bis[tris(μ2‐cyanido‐κ2C,N)dicuprate(I)]]: a unique CuI–CuII mixed‐valence complex containing anionic cuprous cyanide layers and [Cu(NH3)4]2+ cations

The title compound, {[Cu(NH₃)₄][Cu(CN)₃]₂}_n, features a Cu^I–Cu^II mixed‐valence CuCN framework based on {[Cu₂(CN)₃]⁻}_n anionic layers and [Cu(NH₃)₄]²⁺ cations. The asymmetric unit contains two different Cu^I ions and one Cu^II ion which lies on a centre of inversion. Each Cu^I ion is coordinated to three cyanide ligands with a distorted trigonal–planar geometry, while the Cu^II ion is ligated by four ammine ligands, with a distorted square‐planar coordination geometry. The interlinkage between Cu^I ions and cyanide bridges produces a honeycomb‐like {[Cu₂(CN)₃]⁻}_n anionic layer containing 18‐membered planar [Cu(CN)]₆ metallocycles. A [Cu(NH₃)₄]²⁺ cation fills each metallocyclic cavity within pairs of exactly superimposed {[Cu₂(CN)₃]⁻}_n anionic layers, but there are no cations between the layers of adjacent pairs, which are offset. Pairs of N—H...N hydrogen‐bonding interactions link the N—H groups of the ammine ligands to the N atoms of cyanide ligands.     

Ce2[SeO3]3 and Pr2[SeO3]3: Non‐Isostructural Oxoselenates(IV) of the Light Lanthanoids

The crystal structures of Ce₂[SeO₃]₃ and Pr₂[SeO₃]₃ have been refined from X‐ray single‐crystal diffraction data. The compounds were obtained using stoichiometric mixtures of CeO₂, SeO₂, Ce, and CeCl₃ (molar ratio 3:3:1:1) or Pr₆O₁₁, SeO₂, Pr, and PrCl₃ (molar ratio 3:27:1:2) heated in evacuated sealed silica tubes at 830 °C for one week. Ce₂[SeO₃]₃ crystallizes orthorhombically (space group: Pnma), with four formula units per unit cell of the dimensions a = 839.23(5) pm, b = 1421.12(9) pm, and c = 704.58(4) pm. Its structure contains only a single crystallographically unique Ce³⁺ cation in tenfold coordination with oxygen atoms arranged as single‐face bicapped square antiprism and two different trigonal pyramidal [SeO₃]^2? groups. The connectivity among the [CeO₁₀] polyhedra results in infinite sheets of face‐ and edge‐sharing units propagating normal to [001]. Pr₂[SeO₃]₃ is monoclinic (space group: P2₁/n) with twelve formula units per unit cell of the dimensions a = 1683.76(9) pm, b = 705.38(4) pm, c = 2167.19(12) pm, and β = 102.063(7)°. Its structure exhibits six crystallographically distinct Pr³⁺ cations in nine‐ and tenfold coordination with oxygen atoms forming distorted capped square antiprisms or prisms (CN = 9), bicapped square antiprisms and tetracapped trigonal prisms (CN = 10), respectively. The [PrO₉] and [PrO₁₀] polyhedra form double layers parallel to (111) by edge‐ or face‐sharing, which are linked by nine different [SeO₃]^2? groups to build up a three‐dimensional framework. In both compounds, the discrete [SeO₃]^2? anions (d(Se⁴⁺–O^2?) = 166–174 pm) show the typical Ψ¹‐tetrahedral shape owing to the non‐bonding “lone‐pair” electrons at the central selenium(IV) particles. Moreover, their stereochemical “lone‐pair” activity seems to flock together in large empty channels running along [010] in the orthorhombic Ce₂[SeO₃]₃ and along [101] in the monoclinic Pr₂[SeO₃]₃ structure, respectively.     

Iodoplumbate mit vier‐ und fünffach koordinierten Pb2+‐Ionen

Iodoplumbates with Tetra‐ and Penta‐coordinated Pb²⁺ Ions In contrast to all known iodoplumbates with octahedrally coordinated Pb²⁺ ions, square pyramidal geometry is observed in the iodoplumbate chains of (Pr₄N)[PbI₃] ( 1 ) and [Mg(dmf)₆][PbI₃]₂ ( 2 ), whereas the isolated anions in (Ph₄P)₂[Pb₂I₆] ( 3 ) and [Bu₃N–(CH₂)₃–NBu₃][PbI₄] ( 4 ) contain tetra‐coordinated lead atoms. (Pr₄N)[PbI₃] ( 1 ): a = 910.86(6), b = 1221.46(7), c = 1907.7(1) pm, V = 2122.5(2) · 10⁶ pm³, space group P2₁2₁2₁; [Mg(dmf)₆][PbI₃]₂ ( 2 ): a = 891.24(9), b = 1025.34(7), c = 1234.82(9) pm, α = 92.938(8), β = 106.457(8), γ = 98.100(7)°, V = 1066.4(2) · 10⁶ pm³, space group P1; (Ph₄P)₂[Pb₂I₆] ( 3 ): a = 1174.5(1), b = 722.29(7), c = 3104.8(4) pm, β = 100.50(1)°, V = 2589.8(5) · 10⁶ pm³, space group P2₁/n; [Bu₃N–(CH₂)₃–NBu₃][PbI₄] ( 4 ): a = 2178.3(1), b = 1008.63(5), c = 1888.3(1) pm, β = 110.003(5)°, V = 3898.6(4) · 10⁶ pm³, space group P2/c.     

A Novel Concept for the Synthesis of Multiply Doped Gold Clusters [(M@AunM′m)Lk]q+

Heterometal‐doped gold clusters are poorly accessible through wet‐chemical approaches and main‐group‐metal‐ or early‐transition‐metal‐doped gold clusters are rare. Compounds [M(AuPMe₃)₁₁(AuCl)]³⁺ (M=Pt, Pd, Ni) ( 1 – 3 ), [Ni(AuPPh₃)_(8?2n)(AuCl)₃(AlCp*)_n] (n=1, 2) ( 4, 5 ), and [Mo(AuPMe₃)₈ (GaCl₂)₃(GaCl)]⁺ ( 6 ) were selectively obtained by the transmetalation of [M(M′Cp*)_n] (M=Mo, E=Ga, n=6; M=Pt, Pd, Ni, M′=Ga, Al, n=4) with [ClAuPR₃] (R=Me, Ph) and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and ESI mass spectrometry. DFT calculations were used to analyze the bonding situation. The transmetalation proved to be a powerful tool for the synthesis of heterometal‐doped gold clusters with a design rule based on the 18 valence electron count for the central metal atom M and in agreement with the unified superatom concept based on the jellium model.     

Univalent Gallium and Indium Phosphane Complexes: From Pyramidal M(PPh3)3+ to Carbene‐Analogous Bent M(PtBu3)2+ (M=Ga,In) Complexes

In a new oxidative route, Ag⁺[Al(OR^F)₄]^? (R^F=C(CF₃)₃) and metallic indium were sonicated in aromatic solvents, such as fluorobenzene (PhF), to give a precipitate of silver metal and highly soluble [In(PhF)_n]⁺ salts (n=2, 3) with the weakly coordinating [Al(OR^F)₄]^? anion in quantitative yield. The In⁺ salt and the known analogous Ga⁺[Al(OR^F)₄]^? were used to synthesize a series of homoleptic PR₃ phosphane complexes [M(PR₃)_n]⁺, that is, the weakly PPh₃‐bridged [(Ph₃P)₃In–(PPh₃)–In(PPh₃)₃]²⁺ that essentially contains two independent [In(PPh₃)₃]⁺ cations or, with increasing bulk of the phosphane, the carbene‐analogous [M(PtBu₃)₂]⁺ (M=Ga, In) cations. The M^I? P distances are 27 to 29 pm longer for indium, and thus considerably longer than the difference between their tabulated radii (18 pm). The structure, formation, and frontier orbitals of these complexes were investigated by calculations at the BP86/SV(P), B3LYP/def2‐TZVPP, MP2/def2‐TZVPP, and SCS‐MP2/def2‐TZVPP levels.     

Self‐Assembled Multimetallic/Peptide Complexes: Structures and Unimolecular Reactions of [Mn(GlyGly−H)2n−1]+ and Mn+1(GlyGly−H2n]2+ Clusters in the Gas Phase

The unimolecular chemistry and structures of self‐assembled complexes containing multiple alkaline‐earth‐metal dications and deprotonated GlyGly ligands are investigated. Singly and doubly charged ions [M_n(GlyGly?H)_n‐1]⁺ (n=2–4), [M_n+1(GlyGly?H)_2n]²⁺ (n=2,4,6), and [M(GlyGly?H)GlyGly]⁺ were observed. The losses of 132 Da (GlyGly) and 57 Da (determined to be aminoketene) were the major dissociation pathways for singly charged ions. Doubly charged Mg²⁺ clusters mainly lost GlyGly, whereas those containing Ca²⁺ or Sr²⁺ also underwent charge separation. Except for charge separation, no loss of metal cations was observed. Infrared multiple photon dissociation spectra were the most consistent with the computed IR spectra for the lowest energy structures, in which deprotonation occurs at the carboxyl acid groups and all amide and carboxylate oxygen atoms are complexed to the metal cations. The N?H stretch band, observed at 3350 cm^?1, is indicative of hydrogen bonding between the amine nitrogen atoms and the amide hydrogen atom. This study represents the first into large self‐assembled multimetallic complexes bound by peptide ligands.     

Pb5I2P28, $^{1}_{\infty}\rm [PbP_{14}]{\rm ^{2-}}$ Strands Coordinated to a Unique [Pb3I2]4+ Unit

Pb₅I₂P₂₈ is the first compound containing a former unseen [P₃I₂]⁴⁺ unit, connecting two crystallographically independent adjacent [PbP₁₄]^2? polyphosphide strands. The polyanion substructure is closely related to the one realized in the HgPbP₁₄ structure type, with a homo‐nuclear coordination of the cations to the polyanions. It has been prepared by using the mineralizator concept for polyphosphides from the elements and PbI₂ as the mineralizator species. The new polyphosphide has a pronounced tendency to form easy cleavable, needle shaped crystals featuring massive stacking vaults. Nevertheless, a single crystal structure determination was possible from inter‐grown crystals. Pb₅I₂P₂₈ crystallizes monoclinically in the space group P2₁/n (No. 14) with lattice parameters of a = 9.792(2), b = 17.717(2), c = 19.191(3) Å, β = 96.39(1)°, V = 3308.6(8) ų. Depending on the preparation route, the aspect ratio of the needle shaped crystals can be varied.     

Helical Poly(α,β‐unsaturated ketone) with Bulky Pendant of Binaphthyl from Anionic Polymerization of ((−)‐Menthyl (S)‐6′‐Acrylyl‐2′‐methyloxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboxylate

((?)‐Menthyl (S)‐6′‐acrylyl‐2′‐methyloxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboxylate ( 3 ) was synthesized and anionically polymerized using n‐BuLi as an initiator in toluene. The monomer 3 was levorotatory and had an [α]_D²⁵ value of ?72.4, but its corresponding polymer poly‐ 3 was dextrorotatory and showed an [α]_D²⁵ value of +162.0. Poly‐ 3 was confirmed to exist in the form of one‐handed helical structure in solution by means of comparing the specific optical rotation and the CD spectra with that of 3 and the model compounds such as (?)‐menthyl (S)‐6′‐propionyl‐2′‐methyloxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboxylate 2b and (?)‐menthyl (S)‐6′‐heptanoyl‐2′‐methyloxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboxylate 2c . This conclusion was also confirmed by the fact that the g‐value of poly‐ 3 is about 11 times of that of monomer 3 .     

Metal‐catalyzed reversible conversion between chemical and electrical energy designed towards a sustainable society

Proton dissociation of an aqua‐Ru‐quinone complex, [Ru(trpy)(q)(OH₂)]²⁺ (trpy = 2,2′ : 6′,2″‐terpyridine, q = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylquinone) proceeded in two steps (pK_a = 5.5 and ca. 10.5). The first step simply produced [Ru(trpy)(q)(OH)]⁺, while the second one gave an unusual oxyl radical complex, [Ru(trpy)(sq)(O^?.)]⁰ (sq = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylsemiquinone), owing to an intramolecular electron transfer from the resultant O^2? to q. A dinuclear Ru complex bridged by an anthracene framework, [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺ (btpyan = 1,8‐bis(2,2′‐terpyridyl)anthracene), was prepared to place two Ru(trpy)(q)(OH) groups at a close distance. Deprotonation of the two hydroxy protons of [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺ generated two oxyl radical Ru‐O^?. groups, which worked as a precursor for O₂ evolution in the oxidation of water. The [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂](SbF₆)₂ modified ITO electrode effectively catalyzed four‐electron oxidation of water to evolve O₂ (TON = 33500) under electrolysis at +1.70 V in H₂O (pH 4.0). Various physical measurements and DFT calculations indicated that a radical coupling between two Ru(sq)(O^?.) groups forms a (cat)Ru‐O‐O‐Ru(sq) (cat = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylcathechol) framework with a μ‐superoxo bond. Successive removal of four electrons from the cat, sq, and superoxo groups of [Ru₂(btpyan)(cat)(sq)(μ‐O₂^?)]⁰ assisted with an attack of two water (or OH^?) to Ru centers, which causes smooth O₂ evolution with regeneration of [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺. Deprotonation of an Ru‐quinone‐ammonia complex also gave the corresponding Ru‐semiquinone‐aminyl radical. The oxidized form of the latter showed a high catalytic activity towards the oxidation of methanol in the presence of base. Three complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(C(O)OH)]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(CO₂)]⁰ exist as an equilibrium mixture in water. Treatment of [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺ with BH₄^? gave [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(C(O)H)]⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(CH₂OH)]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(OH₂)]²⁺ with generation of CH₃OH in aqueous conditions. Based on these results, a reasonable catalytic pathway from CO₂ to CH₃OH in electro‐ and photochemical CO₂ reduction is proposed. A new pbn (pbn = 2‐pyridylbenzo[b]‐1,5‐naphthyridine) ligand was designed as a renewable hydride donor for the six‐electron reduction of CO₂. A series of [Ru(bpy)_3‐n(pbn)_n]²⁺ (n = 1, 2, 3) complexes undergoes photochemical two‐ (n = 1), four‐ (n = 2), and six‐electron reductions (n = 3) under irradiation of visible light in the presence of N(CH₂CH₂OH)₃. © 2009 The Japan Chemical Journal Forum and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Chem Rec 9: 169–186; 2009: Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ) DOI 10.1002/tcr.200800039     

[3+2] Cycloadditions of Metallo Nitrile Ylides and Metallo Nitrile Imines with Metal Carbonyl,Thiocarbonyl, and Isocyanide Complexes: Heterodimetallic Systems with Bridging Heterocycles [1]

The reactions of [Re(CO)₆]⁺, [FeCp(CO)₂CS]⁺ and [FeCp(CNPh)₃]⁺ with the metallo nitrile ylides [M^–{C⁺=N–C^–(H)CO₂Et}(CO)₅]^– (M = Cr, W) and the chromio nitrile imine [Cr^–{C⁺=N–N^–H}(CO)₅]^– (generated by mono‐α‐deprotonation of the parent isocyanide complexes) to give neutral 5‐metallated 1,3‐oxazolin‐ ( 1 ), 1,3‐thiazolin‐ ( 2 ), imidazolin‐ ( 3 , 4 ), 1,3,4‐oxdiazolin‐ ( 5 ), 1,3,4‐thiadiazolin‐ ( 6 ) and 1,3,4‐triazolin‐2‐ylidene ( 8 ) chromium and tungsten complexes represent the first all‐organometallic versions of Huisgen’s 1,3‐dipolar cycloadditions. The formation of 6 and 8 is accompanied by partial decomposition to (OC)₅Cr–C≡N–FeCpL₂ {L = CO ( 7 ), CNPh ( 9 )}. The structures of 4a and 5 have been characterized by X‐ray diffraction.     

Coordination Chemistry of Diiodine and Implications for the Oxidation Capacity of the Synergistic Ag+/X2 (X=Cl,Br, I) System

The synergistic Ag⁺/X₂ system (X=Cl, Br, I) is a very strong, but ill‐defined oxidant—more powerful than X₂ or Ag⁺ alone. Intermediates for its action may include [Ag_m(X₂)_n]^m+ complexes. Here, we report on an unexpectedly variable coordination chemistry of diiodine towards this direction: ( A )Ag‐I₂‐Ag( A ), [Ag₂(I₂)₄]²⁺( A ⁻)₂ and [Ag₂(I₂)₆]²⁺( A ⁻)₂⋅(I₂)_x≈0.65 form by reaction of Ag( A ) ( A =Al(OR^F)₄; R^F=C(CF₃)₃) with diiodine (single crystal/powder XRD, Raman spectra and quantum‐mechanical calculations). The molecular ( A )Ag‐I₂‐Ag( A ) is ideally set up to act as a 2 e⁻ oxidant with stoichiometric formation of 2 AgI and 2 A ⁻. Preliminary reactivity tests proved this ( A )Ag‐I₂‐Ag( A ) starting material to oxidize n‐C₅H₁₂, C₃H₈, CH₂Cl₂, P₄ or S₈ at room temperature. A rough estimate of its electron affinity places it amongst very strong oxidizers like MF₆ (M=4d metals). This suggests that ( A )Ag‐I₂‐Ag( A ) will serve as an easily in bulk accessible, well‐defined, and very potent oxidant with multiple applications.     

Coordination Chemistry of Diiodine and Implications for the Oxidation Capacity of the Synergistic Ag+/X2 (X=Cl,Br, I) System

The synergistic Ag⁺/X₂ system (X=Cl, Br, I) is a very strong, but ill‐defined oxidant—more powerful than X₂ or Ag⁺ alone. Intermediates for its action may include [Ag_m(X₂)_n]^m+ complexes. Here, we report on an unexpectedly variable coordination chemistry of diiodine towards this direction: ( A )Ag‐I₂‐Ag( A ), [Ag₂(I₂)₄]²⁺( A ^?)₂ and [Ag₂(I₂)₆]²⁺( A ^?)₂?(I₂)_x≈0.65 form by reaction of Ag( A ) ( A =Al(OR^F)₄; R^F=C(CF₃)₃) with diiodine (single crystal/powder XRD, Raman spectra and quantum‐mechanical calculations). The molecular ( A )Ag‐I₂‐Ag( A ) is ideally set up to act as a 2 e^? oxidant with stoichiometric formation of 2 AgI and 2 A ^?. Preliminary reactivity tests proved this ( A )Ag‐I₂‐Ag( A ) starting material to oxidize n‐C₅H₁₂, C₃H₈, CH₂Cl₂, P₄ or S₈ at room temperature. A rough estimate of its electron affinity places it amongst very strong oxidizers like MF₆ (M=4d metals). This suggests that ( A )Ag‐I₂‐Ag( A ) will serve as an easily in bulk accessible, well‐defined, and very potent oxidant with multiple applications.     

以[M(DETA)2)]n+(M=Cu2+, Ni2+, Co3+)为客体的MnPS3夹层化合物的合成、结构表征与磁性研究

将过渡金属配合物阳离子([M(DETA)₂]ⁿ⁺(M=Cu²⁺,Ni²⁺,Co³⁺;DETA=Diethylenetriamine,二乙烯三胺)作为客体插入层状MnPS₃层间得到了相应的3个夹层化合物。通过X-射线粉末衍射、元素分析和红外光谱对夹层化合物的结构进行了表征。结果表明,与主体MnPS₃ 0.65 nm的层间距相比较,夹层化合物(Mn_0.88PS₃[Cu(DETA)₂]_0.12)的层间距扩大了0.32 nm,由此推测客体[Cu(DETA)₂]²⁺在层间以平面四方的配位形式存在,而另2个夹层化合物(Mn_0.79PS₃[Ni(DETA)₂]_0.21和Mn_0.74PS₃[Co(DETA)₂]_0.17)的层间距扩大了0.48 nm,说明客体[(M(DETA)₂]ⁿ⁺,M=Co³⁺,Ni²⁺) 在主体层间以八面体配位形式存在。磁性测试结果表明过渡金属离子[(M(DETA)₂]ⁿ⁺(M=Cu²⁺,Co³⁺)的插入能引起主体MnPS₃的磁性在35~40 K发生由顺磁向亚铁磁性的转变并表现自发磁化,而客体[Ni(DETA)₂]²⁺却使夹层化合物的反铁磁相互作用增强,抑制了自发磁化的发生。     

On the Ligand‐to‐Metal Charge‐Transfer Photochemistry of the Copper(II) Complexes of Quercetin and Rutin

In contrast to the UV‐photoinduced ligand photoionization of the flavonoid complexes of Fe^III, redox reactions initiated in ligand‐to‐metal charge‐transfer excited states were observed on irradiation of the quercetin ( 1 ) and rutin ( 2 ) complexes of Cu^II. Solutions of complexes with stoichiometries [Cu^IIL₂] (L=quercetin, rutin) and [Cu^II₂L_n] (n=1, L=quercetin; n=3, L=rutin) were flash‐irradiated at 351 nm. Transient spectra observed in these experiments showed the formation of radical ligands corresponding to the one‐electron oxidation of L and the reduction of Cu^II to Cu^I. The radical ligands remained coordinated to the Cu^I centers, and the substitution reactions replacing them by solvent occurred with lifetimes τ<350 ns. These are lifetimes shorter than the known lifetimes (τ>1 ms) of the quercetin and rutin radical's decay.     

Three Distinct Silver(I) Coordination Polymers: Bridging‐­Ligand Directed Syntheses,Crystal Structures,Luminescence, and Nitrobenzene Sensing Properties

Three distinct Ag^I‐DMAP [DMAP = 4‐(dimethylamino)pyridine] coordination polymers [Ag₂I₂(DMAP)₂]_n ( 1 ), [Ag₂(CN)₂(DMAP)_2.5 · DMAP]_n ( 2 ), and [Ag(SCN)(DMAP)]_n ( 3 ) were constructed by monatomic I^–, diatomic CN^–, and triatomic SCN^– bridges, respectively. 1 – 3 were determined by FT‐IR spectroscopy, elemental analyses, TGA, powder and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. 1 exhibits a 1D wavelike chain structure, sustained by 3‐connected I^– bridges, whereas 2 shows a unique 1D single‐ and double‐strand alternating chain, supported by 3‐connected CN^– bridges. Compound 3 has a 2D 3‐connected network architecture, fabricated by 3‐connected SCN^– bridges, and exhibits a (4 · 8²) topology. The luminescence and nitrobenzene sensing properties of 1 – 3 were explored in 2‐propanol suspensions, which revealed that compounds 1 – 3 exhibit DMAP originated luminescence emissions and are highly sensitive for nitrobenzene detection.     

Nanometer Channels and Cages within the Extended Basic Mercurous Cations [(Hg2)3(OH)2]4+ and [(Hg2)2O]2+

The two‐ and three‐dimensional mercurous cations [(Hg₂)₃(OH)₂]⁴⁺ and [(Hg₂)₂O]²⁺ crystallize with channels and cages of roughly 1 nm diameter from aqueous solutions dependent upon the acidity of the solution. Crystal structures were determined, for example, for [Zn(H₂O)₆][(Hg₂)₃(OH)₂](NO₃)₆ (trigonal, space group P321, a = 1183.5(2) pm, c = 534.8(1) pm, Z = 1, R1 = 0.0351 for I₀ > 2σ(I₀)) and for [(Hg₂)₂O][Pb(NO₃)₃]₂ (cubic, space group , a = 1543.1(2) pm, Z = 8, R1 = 0.0534 I₀ > 2σ(I₀)).