Selective Inhibition of Collagen‐Induced Platelet Aggregation by a Cyclic Peptide from Drymaria diandra

Four cyclic peptides, diandrine A–D ( 1 – 4 ), were isolated from the MeOH extract of Formosan Drymaria diandra. Their structures were elucidated by chemical and spectroscopic analyses as cyclo(‐Gly¹‐Pro²‐Trp³‐Pro⁴‐Tyr⁵‐Phe⁶‐), cyclo(‐Gly¹‐Pro²‐Leu³‐Pro⁴‐Leu⁵‐Trp⁶‐Ser⁷‐Ser⁸‐), cyclo(Gly¹‐Gly²‐Pro³‐Tyr⁴‐Trp⁵‐Pro⁶‐), and cyclo(Gly¹‐Gly²‐Pro³‐Tyr⁴‐Trp⁵‐Pro⁶‐), respectively. Compounds 3 and 4 were stable conformational isomers. Cyclopeptide 1 showed a selective inhibitory effect on collagen‐induced platelet aggregation with an IC₅₀ value of 44.2 μM .     

Synthesis and spectroscopic properties of 15n‐labelled 1,2,4‐thiadiazoles

5‐Phenyl‐1,2,4‐thiadiazole‐4‐¹⁵N and 3‐methyl‐5‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐thiadiazole‐4‐¹⁵N were synthesized from commercially available benazmide‐¹⁵N. The mass spectra and the ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹⁵N‐nmr spectra of these compounds, which show various long‐range heteronuclear coupling with the ¹⁵N‐nucleus, are discussed.     

Efficient Access to Enantiopure γ4‐Amino Acids with Proteinogenic Side‐Chains and Structural Investigation of γ4‐Asn and γ4‐Ser in Hybrid Peptide Helices

Hybrid peptides composed of α‐ and β‐amino acids have recently emerged as new class of peptide foldamers. Comparatively, γ‐ and hybrid γ‐peptides composed of γ⁴‐amino acids are less studied than their β‐counterparts. However, recent investigations reveal that γ⁴‐amino acids have a higher propensity to fold into ordered helical structures. As amino acid side‐chain functional groups play a crucial role in the biological context, the objective of this study was to investigate efficient synthesis of γ⁴‐residues with functional proteinogenic side‐chains and their structural analysis in hybrid‐peptide sequences. Here, the efficient and enantiopure synthesis of various N‐ and C‐terminal free‐γ⁴‐residues, starting from the benzyl esters (COOBzl) of N‐Cbz‐protected (E)‐α,β‐unsaturated γ‐amino acids through multiple hydrogenolysis and double‐bond reduction in a single‐pot catalytic hydrogenation is reported. The crystal conformations of eight unprotected γ⁴‐amino acids (γ⁴‐Val, γ⁴‐Leu, γ⁴‐Ile, γ⁴‐Thr(OtBu), γ⁴‐Tyr, γ⁴‐Asp(OtBu), γ⁴‐Glu(OtBu), and γ‐Aib) reveals that these amino acids adopted a helix favoring gauche conformations along the central C^γ? C^β bond. To study the behavior of γ⁴‐residues with functional side chains in peptide sequences, two short hybrid γ‐peptides P1 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Asn‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐CONH₂) and P2 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Ser‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐CONH₂) were designed, synthesized on solid phase, and their 12‐helical conformation in single crystals were studied. Remarkably, the γ⁴‐Asn residue in P1 facilitates the tetrameric helical aggregations through interhelical H bonding between the side‐chain amide groups. Furthermore, the hydroxyl side‐chain of γ⁴‐Ser in P2 is involved in the interhelical H bonding with the backbone amide group. In addition, the analysis of 87 γ⁴‐residues in peptide single‐crystals reveal that the γ⁴‐residues in 12‐helices are more ordered as compared with the 10/12‐ and 12/14‐helices.     

Studies on Synthesis of a Cycloheptapeptide and Effects of Different Metal Ions on the Cyclization

ＩｎｔｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｏｎＣｙｃｌｉｃｐｅｐｔｉｄｅｓ ,ｗｈｉｃｈａｒｅｃｏｎｓｔｒａｉｎｅｄｃｏｎｆｏｒｍａ ｔｉｏｎａｌｌｙａｎｄｍｏｒｅｒｅｓｉｓｔａｎｔｔｏｐｒｏｔｅａｓｅｄｉｇｅｓｔｉｏｎｓｔｈａｎｔｈｅｉｒｌｉｎｅａｒｐｒｅｃｕｒｓｏｒｓ ,ｈａｖｅｂｅｅｎｏｆｇｒｅａｔｉｎｔｅｒｅｓｔａｓｓｙｎｔｈｅｔｉｃｔａｒｇｅｔｓｂｏｔｈａｓｐｏｔｅｎｔｉａｌｄｒｕｇｌｅａｄｓａｎｄａｓｍｏｄｅｌｓｆｏｒｃｏｎ ｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎａｌａｎａｌｙｓｉｓ .1 4 Ｃｕｒｒｅｎｔｍｅｔｈｏｄｓｆｏｒｓｙｎｔ…     

Efficient Microscale Preparation of Isotopically Enriched 1‐[79Br]Bromo‐2‐Fluoroethylene, [79Br]BrHC˭CHF

Abstract

An efficient preparation of 1‐[⁷⁹Br]bromo‐2‐fluoroethylene, [⁷⁹Br]BrHC?CHF, was carried out by a three‐step procedure: (a) natural 1‐bromo‐2‐fluoroethylene, BrHC?CHF, was iodinated to 1‐fluoro‐2‐iodoethylene, FHC?CHI; (b) 1‐fluoro‐2‐iodoethylene was ⁷⁹Br₂‐brominated to 1,2‐di[⁷⁹Br]bromo‐1‐fluoro‐2‐iodoethane, [⁷⁹Br]BrFCHCH[⁷⁹Br]BrI; and (c) 1,2‐di[⁷⁹Br]bromo‐1‐fluoro‐2‐iodoethane was dehalogenated to 1‐[⁷⁹Br]bromo‐2‐fluoroethylene, [⁷⁹Br]BrHC?CHF. The yield of isolated product, on a 2‐mmol scale, was 62% with respect to ⁷⁹Br₂.     

Palladium(II)‐Komplexe des 1,1,3,3,5,5‐Hexakis(dimethylamino)‐λ5‐[1,3,5]triphosphinins

Palladium(II) Complexes of 1,1,3,3,5,5‐Hexakis(dimethylamino)‐λ⁵‐[1,3,5]triphosphinine 1,1,3,3,5,5‐Hexakis(dimethylamino)‐1λ⁵‐3λ⁵‐5λ⁵‐[1,3,5]triphosphinine ( 5 ) reacts with (benzonitrile)₂PdCl₂ to give the chelate complex dichloro(dodeca‐N‐methyl‐1λ⁵,3λ⁵,5λ⁵‐1,3,5‐triphosphinine‐1,1,3,3,5,5‐hexaamin‐C²,C⁴)palladium ( 6 ). In a pyridine‐d₅ solution of 6 the complex dichloro(dodeca‐N‐methyl‐1λ⁵,3λ⁵,5λ⁵‐1,3,5‐triphosphinine‐1,1,3,3,5,5‐hexaamin‐C²)((²H₅)pyridine‐N)palladium ( 7 ) is formed. The solute 7 could not be isolated as a solid, because elimination of the solvent regenerates 6 quantitatively. Properties, nmr and ir spectra of 6 and 7 are reported. 6 is characterized by the results of an X‐ray structural analysis.     

Synthesis,Characterization and Photophysical Properties of Iridium(III) Bis‐cyclometallated Complexes Containing 1,1‐Dithiolates

A series of neutral Ir(III)‐based heteroleptic complexes with a formula of [Ir(η²‐(C^∧N))₂(η²‐(S^∧S))] ((C^∧N)^‐ = ppy^‐, (S^∧S)^‐ = Et₂NCS₂^‐ ( 2a ), MeOCS₂^‐ ( 2b ), EtOCS₂^‐ ( 2c ), ⁱPrOCS₂^‐ ( 2d ); (C^∧N)^‐ = tpy^‐, (S^∧S) = Et₂NCS₂^‐ ( 3a ), MeOCS₂^‐ ( 3b ), EtOCS₂^‐ ( 3c ), ⁱPrOCS₂^‐ ( 3d ); (C^∧N)^‐ = epb^‐ , (S^∧S)^‐ = Et₂NCS₂^‐ ( 4a ), MeOCS₂^‐ ( 4a ), EtOCS₂^‐ ( 4a ); ppyH = 2‐phenylpyridine; tpyH = 2‐(4′‐tolyl)pyridine; epbH = ethyl 4‐(2′‐pyridyl)benzate) was synthesized and characterized. The crystal structure of complex 2d was also determined. The electron‐releasing substituents on (C^∧N)^‐ or (S^∧S)^‐ blueshift λ_max values.     

Self‐aggregation of Synthetic Zinc Chlorophyll Derivatives Possessing 31‐Hydroxy or Methoxy Group and 131‐Mono‐ or Dicyanomethylene Moiety in Nonpolar Organic Solvents as Models of Chlorosomal Bacteriochlorophyll‐d Aggregates

Methyl 13¹‐(di)cyanomethylene‐pyropheophorbides were synthesized by Knoevenagel reactions of the corresponding 13¹‐oxo‐chlorins prepared from modifying chlorophyll‐a with malononitrile or cyanoacetic acid. Alternatively, methyl 13¹‐cyanomethylene‐pyropheophorbides were produced by Wittig reactions of 13¹‐oxo‐chlorins with Ph₃P=CHCN. Self‐aggregation of zinc complexes of the semi‐synthetic chlorophyll derivatives possessing a hydroxy or methoxy group at the 3¹‐position was examined in 1%(v/v) tetrahydrofuran or dichloromethane and hexane by electronic absorption and circular dichroism spectroscopy. Although intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding between the 3¹‐hydroxy and 13¹‐oxo groups of bacteriochlorophylls‐c/d/e/f was essential for their self‐aggregation in natural light‐harvesting antenna systems (=chlorosomes), zinc 3¹‐hydroxy‐13¹‐di/monocyanomethylene‐chlorins self‐aggregated in the less/lesser polar organic solvents to form chlorosome‐like large oligomers in spite of lacking the 13¹‐oxo moiety as the hydrogen‐bonding acceptor. Zinc 3¹‐methoxy‐13¹‐dicyanomethylene‐chlorin gave similar self‐aggregates regardless of lack of both the 3¹‐hydroxy and 13¹‐oxo groups. The present self‐aggregation was ascribable to stronger coordination of the 3¹‐oxygen atom to the central zinc than the conventional systems, where the electron‐withdrawing cyano group(s) increased the coordinative ability of the central zinc through the chlorin π‐system.     

Conformational dynamics of bis(BF2)‐2,2′‐bidipyrrins revealed by through‐space 13C?19F and 19F?19F couplings

The conformation of [bis‐(N,N′‐difluoroboryl)]‐3,3′‐diethyl‐4,4′,8,8′,9,9′,10,10′‐octamethyl‐2,2′‐bidipyrrin (1) in solution was studied by analyzing the ¹³C? ¹⁹F and ¹⁹F? ¹⁹F through‐space spin–spin couplings. The ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were assigned on the basis of nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY), heteronuclear single‐quantum correlation (HSQC), and heteronuclear multiple‐bond correlation (HMBC) experiments. The ¹⁹F spectrum of 1 was compared with that of 2‐ethyl‐1,3,5,6,7‐pentamethyl‐4,4‐difluoro‐4‐bor‐3a,4a‐diaza‐s‐indacen (2). The ¹⁹F? ¹⁹F through‐space spin? spin coupling in 1 was thus assigned and the coupling constant was obtained by simulating the coupling patterns. The obtained conformation of 1 was compared with those of the known complexes [bis‐(N,N′‐difluoroboryl)]‐3,3′,8,8′,9,9′‐hexaethyl‐4,4′,10,10′‐tetramethyl‐6,6′‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐2,2′‐bidipyrrin (3)and [bis‐(N,N′‐difluoroboryl)]‐9,9′‐diethyl‐4,4′,8,8′,10,10′‐hexamethyl‐3,3′‐bis(methoxycarbonylethyl)‐2,2′‐bidipyrrin (4). The conformational dynamics of 1, 3, and 4 was surveyed by observing the temperature dependence of the through‐space coupling constants between 253 and 333 K. The ¹³C? ¹⁹F and ¹⁹F? ¹⁹F through‐space spin–spin couplings thus confirm similar conformations of different BisBODIPYs in solution in contrast to earlier findings in the solid state. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis of Imines via Reactions of Benzyl Alcohol with Amines Using Half‐Sandwich (η6‐p‐cymene) Ruthenium(II) Complexes Stabilised by 2‐aminofluorene Derivatives

A new class of half‐sandwich (η⁶‐p‐cymene) ruthenium(II) complexes supported by 2‐aminofluorene derivatives [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L)] ( L  = 2‐(((9H‐fluoren‐2‐yl)imino)methyl)phenol ( L ¹ ), 2‐(((9H‐fluoren‐2‐yl)imino)methyl)‐3‐methoxyphenol ( L ² ), 1‐(((9H‐fluoren‐2‐yl)imino)methyl)naphthalene‐2‐ol ( L ³ ) and N‐((1H‐pyrrol‐2‐yl)methylene)‐9H‐fluorene‐2‐amine ( L ⁴ )) were synthesized. All compounds were fully characterized by analytical and spectroscopic techniques (IR, UV–Vis, NMR) and also by mass spectrometry. The solid state molecular structures of the complexes [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L²)], [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L³)] and [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L⁴)] revealed that the 2‐aminofluorene and p‐cymene moieties coordinate to ruthenium(II) in a three‐legged piano‐stool geometry. The synthesized complexes were used as catalysts for the dehydrogenative coupling of benzyl alcohol with a range of amines (aliphatic, aromatic and heterocyclic). The reactions were carried out under thermal heating, ultrasound and microwave assistance, using solvent or solvent free conditions, and the catalytic performance was optimized regarding the solvent, the type of base, the catalyst loading and the temperature. Moderately high to very high isolated yields were obtained using [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(Cl)(L⁴)] at 1 mol%. In general, microwave irradiation produced better yields than the other two techniques irrespective of the nature of the substituents.     

Asymmetric Mixed‐Valence Complexes that Consist of Cyclometalated Ruthenium and Ferrocene: Synthesis,Characterization, and Electronic‐Coupling Studies

Three bis‐tridentate ferrocene‐containing cyclometalated ruthenium complexes, [(Fcdpb)Ru(tpy)]⁺ ( 1 ⁺), [(Fctpy)Ru(dpb)]⁺ ( 2 ⁺), and [(Fcdpb)Ru(Fctpy)]⁺ ( 3 ⁺), have been prepared and characterized, where Fcdpb is the 2‐deprotonated form of 1,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐ferrocenylbenzene, tpy is 2,2′:6′,2“‐terpyridine, dpb is the 2‐deprotonated form of 1,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)benzene, and Fctpy is 4′‐ferrocenyl‐2,2′:6′,2”‐terpyridine. Single crystals of compounds 2 ⁺ and 3 ⁺ have been studied by X‐ray analysis. Complexes 1 ⁺ and 2 ⁺ displayed two anodic redox waves, whilst three well‐separated redox couples were observed for compound 3 ⁺. A combined experimental and computational study suggested that the ferrocene unit on the Fcdpb moiety in compounds 1 ⁺ and 3 ⁺ was oxidized first. In contrast, the order of the oxidation of ruthenium and ferrocene in complex 2 ⁺ was reversed. Metal‐to‐metal‐charge‐transfer transitions (MM′CT) have been observed for the singly oxidized states 1 ²⁺, 2 ²⁺, and 3 ²⁺ in the near‐infrared region. Hush analysis showed that the metal–metal electronic couplings in compounds 1 ²⁺ and 3 ²⁺ were much stronger than those in compound 2 ²⁺.     

The Studies of Structure of 2N‐(3‐phenyl‐allyl‐)(5‐phenyl‐[1,3,4] Thiadiazol‐2‐yl) Amine in Solution

2N‐(3‐phenyl‐allyl‐)(5‐phenyl‐[1,3,4] thiadiazol‐2‐yl) amine was studied by means of the ¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁵N NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations. On the basis of the one‐dimensional ¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁵N‐NMR and two‐dimensional ¹H‐¹³C HMQC, ¹H‐¹³C HMBC, ¹H‐¹⁵N HMQC, ¹H¹H NOESY, ¹H¹H COSY correlation spectra the amine‐type and the imine‐type tautomers have been determined in the solution. Variety of structural forms including: biradical, ionic–biradical, and ionic structures of the amine‐type a and of the imine‐type b , c tautomers exist in the solution. According to the DFT computations the differences in the total energy between a and b , a and c , and b and c tautomers are equal to 1.5 kJ/mol, 1.2 kJ/mol, and 0.3 kJ/mol, respectively.     

Synthesis of Novel 4‐((Substituted bis‐indolyl)methyl)‐benzo‐15‐crown‐5 for the Colorimetric Detection of Hg2+ Ions in an Aqueous Medium

A practical, two‐step synthesis of novel 4‐(substituted bis‐indolyl)methyl)benzo‐15‐crown‐5 has been reported. The strategy employed for the synthesis of the desired molecules involved Duff formylation of benzo‐15‐crown‐5 to get 4‐formyl benzo‐15‐crown‐5 followed by subsequent reactions with substituted indoles in trifluoroacetic acid to yield novel 4‐(substituted bis‐indolyl)methyl)benzo‐15‐crown‐5 in moderate to good yield. One of the reported novel molecule tested for the complexation behavior with various metal cations, such as Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Mg²⁺ Ca²⁺, Al³⁺, Fe²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺, Cd²⁺, Sn²⁺, Ba²⁺, Hg²⁺, and Pb²⁺, showed a visual colorimetric probe for the detection of mercury cations (Hg²⁺) in an aqueous medium.     

Thermal Studies of New Lead(II) Coated‐Wire Membrane Electrodes

Five plastic membrane Pb²⁺‐selective electrodes were prepared based on 1,4‐bis(N‐tosyl‐o‐aminophenoxy)butane I , 1,4‐bis(N‐allyl‐N‐tosyl‐o‐aminophenoxy)butane II , 1,4‐bis(N‐benzyl‐N‐tosyl‐o‐aminophenoxy)butane III , 1,4‐bis[N‐(o‐allyloxybenzyl)‐N‐tosyl‐o‐aminophenoxy]butane IV , and 1,4‐bis(N‐octyl‐N‐tosyl‐o‐aminophenoxy)butane V as neutral carriers. The electrodes exhibited nearly Nernstian responses over the concentration ranges, 2.5×10^?4–4.0×10^?2, 2.5×10^?5–4.0×10^?2, 7.9×10^?5–4.0×10^?2, 2.2×10^?5–4.0×10^?2, and 1.9×10^?4–4.0×10^?2 M for electrodes composed with the ionophores I–V , respectively. All electrodes showed pH range of about 4.0 to 11.5 and working temperature range of 22 to 70 °C with isothermal temperature coefficients of 1.19×10^?3, 1.16×10^?3, 1.16×10^?3, 1.00×10^?3 , and 1.32×10^?3 V/°C for electrodes I–V respectively.     

Synthesis and EPR/UV/Vis‐NIR Spectroelectrochemical Investigation of a Persistent Phosphanyl Radical Dication

The reaction of the bis(imidazoliumyl)‐substituted P^I cation [(2‐Im^Dipp)P(4‐Im^Dipp)]⁺ ( 10 ⁺) (2‐Im=imidazolium‐2‐yl; 4‐Im=imidazolium‐4‐yl; Dipp=2,6‐di‐isopropylphenyl) with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (HOTf) or methyl trifluoromethylsulfonate (MeOTf) yields the corresponding protonated [(2‐Im^Dipp)PH(4‐Im^Dipp)]²⁺ ( 11 ²⁺) and methylated [(2‐Im^Dipp)PMe(4‐Im^Dipp)]²⁺ ( 12 ²⁺) dications, respectively. EPR/UV/Vis‐NIR spectroelectrochemical investigation of the low‐coordinated P^I cation 10 ⁺ predicted a stable and “bottleable” P‐centered radical dication [(2‐Im^Dipp)P(4‐Im^Dipp)]^2+. ( 13 ^2+.). The reaction of 10 ⁺ with the nitrosyl salt NO[OTf] yields the persistent phosphanyl radical dication 13 ^2+. as triflate salt in crystalline form. Quantum chemical investigation revealed an exceptional high spin density at the P atom.     

Metal Derivatives of Thiosemicarbazones: Crystal and Mole­cular Structures of Mono‐ and Dinuclear Copper(II) Complexes with N1‐Subsitituted Salicylaldehyde Thiosemicarbazones

Reactions of copper(II) acetate with N¹‐subsitituted salicylaldehyde thiosemicarbazones [R¹R²C²=N³–N²H–C¹(=S)–N¹HR³;R¹ = 2‐HO–C₆H₄–, R² = H : R³ = Me (H₂L¹), Et (H₂L²)] are described. Copper(II) acetate was reacted with H₂L¹ and H₂L² ligands in the presence of polypyridyl co‐ligands, and this led to the formation ofmononuclear complexes, [Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L¹)(κ²‐N, N‐bipy)] ( 1 ),[Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L)(κ²‐N, N‐phen)] [L = L¹ ( 3 ), L² ( 4 )], [Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L)(κ²‐N, N‐tmphen)] [L =L¹ ( 5 ), L² ( 6 )] and a dinuclear complex, [Cu₂L²₂(bipy)] ( 2 ) (bipy = 2, 2′‐bipyridine, phen = 1, 10‐phenanthroline, tmphen = 3, 4, 7, 8‐tetramethyl‐1, 10‐phenanthroline). In dinuclear complex 2 , one ligand is O, N³,S‐chelating, while second is O, N³,S‐chelation‐cum‐N²‐bridging; and in all others thio‐ligands are O, N³,S‐chelating. The μ_eff values for the complexes lie in the range of 1.79–1.83 BM. Complexes 1 , 3 – 6 have square pyramidal arrangement, whereas complex 2 has two independent molecules in the crystal lattice, and each molecule has trigonal bipyramidal square planar (5:4) coordination pair. Complexes 2 , 4 , and 6 showed fluorescence properties.     

A New Cyclopeptide from Clausena anisum‐olens

A new cyclopeptide, clausenain I ( 1 ), has been isolated by a multi‐step chromatography procedure from Clausena anisum‐olens. Its structure was elucidated as cyclo (‐Gly¹‐Ile²‐Ile³‐Val⁴‐Leu⁵‐Ile⁶‐Ile⁷‐Leu⁸‐Leu⁹‐) by extensive 2D‐NMR spectroscopic methods and chemical evidence. It is the first time that a natural cyclic peptide has been isolated from the genus Clausena.     

Synthesis of 2′‐O‐[(Triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (= tom)‐Protected Ribonucleoside Phosphoramidites Containing Various Nucleobase Analogues

The first results of a study aiming at an efficient preparation of a large variety of 2′‐O‐[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl(= tom)‐protected ribonucleoside phosphoramidite building blocks containing modified nucleobases are reported. All of the here presented nucleosides have already been incorporated into RNA sequences by several other groups, employing 2′‐O‐tbdms‐ or 2′‐O‐tom‐protected phosphoramidite building blocks (tbdms = (tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyl). We now optimized existing reactions, developed some new and shorter synthetic strategies, and sometimes introduced other nucleobase‐protecting groups. The 2′‐O‐tom, 5′‐O‐(dimethoxytrityl)‐protected ribonucleosides N²‐acetylisocytidine 5 , O²‐(diphenylcarbamoyl)‐N⁶‐isobutyrylisoguanosine 8 , N⁶‐isobutyryl‐N²‐(methoxyacetyl)purine‐2,6‐diamine ribonucleoside (= N⁸‐isobutyryl‐2‐[(methoxyacetyl)amino]adenosine) 11 , 5‐methyluridine 13 , and 5,6‐dihydrouridine 15 were prepared by first introducing the nucleobase protecting groups and the dimethoxytrityl group, respectively, followed by the 2′‐O‐tom group (Scheme 1). The other presented 2′‐O‐tom, 5′‐O‐(dimethoxytrityl)‐protected ribonucleosides inosine 17 , 1‐methylinosine 18 , N⁶‐isopent‐2‐enyladenosine 21 , N⁶‐methyladenosine 22 , N⁶,N⁶‐dimethyladenosine 23 , 1‐methylguanosine 25 , N²‐methylguanosine 27 , N²,N²‐dimethylguanosine 29 , N⁶‐(chloroacetyl)‐1‐methyladenosine 32 , N⁶‐{{{(1S,2R)‐2‐{[(tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyl]oxy}‐1‐{[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl}propyl}amino}carbonyl}}adenosine 34 (derived from L ‐threonine) and N⁴‐acetyl‐5‐methylcytidine 36 were prepared by nucleobase transformation reactions from standard, already 2′‐O‐tom‐protected ribonucleosides (Schemes 2–4). Finally, all these nucleosides were transformed into the corresponding phosphoramidites 37 – 52 (Scheme 5), which are fully compatible with the assembly and deprotection conditions for standard RNA synthesis based on 2′‐O‐tom‐protected monomeric building blocks.     

Methoxy‐ether and crown‐ether ­derivatives of tetrahomodioxa‐ and octahomotetraoxacalix­[4]­arenes

Three methoxy­‐ether and one methoxy‐­ether/crown‐ether derivatives of p‐tert‐butyl­tetrahomodioxa‐ and p‐R‐octahomo­tetraoxacalix­[4]­arenes (R = methyl, tert‐butyl, H) have been investigated. The first three compounds, 7,15,21,27‐tetra‐tert‐butyl‐29,30,31,32‐tetra­methoxy‐3,11‐dioxapenta­cyclo­[23.3.­1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^19,23]­ditriaconta‐1(29),5,7,­9(30),­13,15,‐17(31),­19,21,23(32),25,27‐dodecaene, C₅₀H₆₈O₆, 33,34,35,36‐tetra­methoxy‐7,15,23,31‐tetra­methyl‐3,11,19,27‐tetra­oxa­penta­cyclo[27.3.1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^21,25]­hexa­tri­aconta‐1(33),5,7,9(34),13,15,­17(35),21,23,25(36),29,31‐dodecaene, C₄₀H₄₈O₈, and 7,23‐di‐tert‐butyl‐33,34,35,36‐tetra­methoxy‐3,11,19,27‐tetraoxapenta­cyclo­[27.3.1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^21,25]­hexatriaconta‐1(33),5,7,9(34),13,15,­17(35),‐ 21,23,25(36),29,31‐dodecaene, C₄₄H₅₆O₈, in the partial‐cone or 1,2‐alternate conformations, present the common feature of methoxy‐­ether self‐inclusion, while the fourth, 42,43‐di­methoxy‐7,15,23,31‐tetra­methyl‐3,11,19,27,34,37,40‐heptaoxahexa­cyclo[15.15.9.1^5,9.1^21,25.0^13,41.0^29,33]­tritetra­conta‐5(42),6,8,13(41),­14,16,21(43),22,24,29(33),30,32‐dodecaene, C₄₂H₅₀O₉, adopts the 1,3‐alternate conformation owing to the presence of a 1,3‐polyether chain.