共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Andrew Bailey 《Acta Analytica》2007,22(2):85-103
This paper resurrects two discredited ideas in the philosophy of mind. The first: the idea that perceptual illusion might
have something metaphysically significant to tell us about the nature of phenomenal consciousness. The second: that the colours
and other qualities that ‘fill’ our sensory fields are occurrent properties (rather than representations of properties) that
are, nevertheless, to be distinguished from the ‘objective’ properties of things in the external world. Theories of consciousness
must recognize the existence of what Daniel Dennett mockingly labels ‘figment,’ but this result—though metaphysically and
epistemologically significant—is not incompatible with either physicalism or naturalized semantics.
相似文献
Andrew BaileyEmail: |
2.
3.
Claudio de Almeida 《Acta Analytica》2007,22(4):301-319
It is argued, on the basis of new counterexamples, that neither knowledge nor epistemic justification (or “epistemic rationality”)
can reasonably be thought to be closed under logical implication. The argument includes an attempt to reconcile the fundamental
intuitions of the opposing parties in the debate.
相似文献
Claudio de AlmeidaEmail: |
4.
Kelly Becker 《Acta Analytica》2009,24(1):17-31
Timothy Williamson has provided damaging counterexamples to Robert Nozick’s sensitivity principle. The examples are based
on Williamson’s anti-luminosity arguments, and they show how knowledge requires a margin for error that appears to be incompatible
with sensitivity. I explain how Nozick can rescue sensitivity from Williamson’s counterexamples by appeal to a specific conception
of the methods by which an agent forms a belief. I also defend the proposed conception of methods against Williamson’s criticisms.
相似文献
Kelly BeckerEmail: |
5.
Javier Kalhat 《Acta Analytica》2008,23(2):161-176
In this paper I argue against Armstrong’s recent truthmaking account of possibility. I show that the truthmaking account presupposes
modality in a number of different ways, and consequently that it is incapable of underwriting a genuine reduction of modality.
I also argue that Armstrong’s account faces serious difficulties irrespective of the question of reduction; in particular,
I argue that his Entailment and Possibility Principles are both false.
相似文献
Javier KalhatEmail: |
6.
Dwayne Moore 《Acta Analytica》2009,24(3):211-222
7.
Warren Shrader 《Acta Analytica》2008,23(3):257-271
This paper is an investigation into the nature of physicalism as well as to the possibility of formulating physicalism as
a supervenience thesis. First, I review the motivation for finding a supervenience thesis that characterizes physicalism.
Second, I briefly survey the types of supervenience theses that have been proposed as necessary (or, in some cases, as necessary
and sufficient) for physicalism. Third, I analyze the recent supervenience thesis proposed by Frank Jackson and expounded
upon by Gene Witmer. Jackson claims the supervenience thesis is both necessary and sufficient for physicalism; Witmer has
proposed a different interpretation of one of the Jackson’s key notions and has suggested an amended supervenience thesis
that is, if not sufficient, at least necessary for physicalism. However, I will argue that neither Jackson’s nor Witmer’s
supervenience theses as stated are necessary for physicalism.
相似文献
Warren ShraderEmail: |
8.
Steffen Borge 《Acta Analytica》2009,24(2):149-154
In this paper I argue against a criticism by Matthew Weiner to Grice’s thesis that cancellability is a necessary condition
for conversational implicature. I argue that the purported counterexamples fail because the supposed failed cancellation in
the cases Weiner presents is not meant as a cancellation but as a reinforcement of the implicature. I moreover point out that
there are special situations in which the supposed cancellation may really work as a cancellation.
相似文献
Steffen BorgeEmail: |
9.
Charlie Pelling 《Acta Analytica》2007,22(3):169-182
According to the conceptualist view in the philosophy of perception, we possess concepts for all the objects, properties,
and relations which feature in our experiences. Richard Heck has recently argued that the phenomenon of illusory experience
provides us with conclusive reasons to reject this view. In this paper, I examine Heck’s argument, I explain why I think that
Bill Brewer’s conceptualist response to it is ineffective, and I then outline an alternative conceptualist response which
I myself endorse. My argument turns on the fact that both Heck, in constructing his objection to conceptualism, and Brewer,
in responding to it, miss a crucial distinction between perceptual demonstrative concepts of objects, on the one hand, and
perceptual demonstrative concepts of properties, on the other.
相似文献
Charlie PellingEmail: |
10.
Nikolaj Nottelman 《Acta Analytica》2007,22(2):105-124
In this paper I discuss the claim that believing at will is ‘conceptually impossible’ or, to use a formulation encountered
in the debate, “that nothing could be a belief and be willed directly”. I argue that such a claim is only plausible if directed
against the claim that believing itself is an action-type. However, in the debate, the claim has been univocally directed
against the position that forming a belief is an action-type. I argue that the many arguments offered in favor of the ‘conceptual impossibility’ of performing
such actions fail without exception. If we are to argue against doxastic voluntarism we are better off by resorting to more
modest means.
相似文献
Nikolaj NottelmanEmail: |
11.
Mark van Roojen 《Acta Analytica》2008,23(4):319-335
This paper presents a non-consequentialist defense of Rawls’s general conception of justice requiring that primary social
goods be distributed so that the least share is as great as possible. It suggests that a defense of this idea can be offered
within a Rossian framework of prima facie duties. The prima facie duty not to harm constrains people from supporting social
institutions which do not leave their fellows with goods and resources above a certain threshold. The paper argues that societies
in accord with the Rawlsian general conception come closest to meeting this requirement. This way of arguing for the conception
enables the defenders of the theory to elude standard objections offered by utilitarians, libertarians, and even other egalitarians.
相似文献
Mark van RoojenEmail: |
12.
Nic Damnjanovic 《Acta Analytica》2009,24(2):113-126
In several publications Graeme Forbes has developed and defended one of the strongest arguments for essentialism about biological
origins. I attempt to show that there are deep, as yet unrecognized, problems with this argument. The problems with Forbes’s
argument suggest that a range of other arguments for various forms of origin essentialism are also likely to be flawed, and
that we should abandon the seemingly plausible general metaphysical thesis that concrete entities that share all intrinsic
properties are identical.
相似文献
Nic DamnjanovicEmail: |
13.
Christopher Buford 《Acta Analytica》2009,24(3):197-209
Lynne Rudder Baker’s Constitution View of human persons has come under much recent scrutiny. Baker argues that each human person is constituted by, but not identical
to, a human animal. Much of the critical discussion of Baker’s Constitution View has focused upon this aspect of her account.
Less has been said about the positive diachronic account of personal identity offered by Baker. Baker argues that it is sameness of what she labels ‘first-person perspective’
that is essential to understanding personal identity over time. Baker claims that her account avoids the commitment to indeterminacy of personal identity entailed by the psychological
account. Further, the psychological account, but not her account, is plagued by what Baker labels the ‘duplication problem’.
In the end, I argue that neither of these considerations forces us to renounce the psychological account and adopt Baker’s
favored account.
相似文献
Christopher BufordEmail: |
14.
Charles B. Cross 《Acta Analytica》2008,23(2):115-124
I show the incompatibility of two theses: (a) to desire the truth of p amounts to believing a certain proposition about the value of p’s truth; (b) one cannot be said to desire the truth of p if one believes that p is true. Thesis (a), the Desire-As-Belief Thesis, has received much attention since the late 1980s. Thesis (b) is an epistemic
variant of Socrates’ remark in the Symposium that one cannot desire what one already has. It turns out that (a) and (b) cannot both be true if it is possible for there
to exist an agent who has a desire initially, say the desire for the truth of p, and then expands the corpus of propositions she believes to include p. This result provides a new route to the denial of (a).
相似文献
Charles B. CrossEmail: |
15.
István Aranyosi 《Acta Analytica》2009,24(1):1-10
In his latest book, Roy Sorensen offers a solution to a puzzle he put forward in an earlier article -The Disappearing Act.
The puzzle involves various question about how the causal theory perception is to be applied to the case of seeing shadows.
Sorensen argues that the puzzle should be taken as bringing out a new way of seeing shadows. I point out a problem for Sorensen’s
solution, and offer and defend an alternative view, according to which the puzzle is to be interpreted as showing a new way
of seeing objects, in virtue of their contrast with light.
相似文献
István AranyosiEmail: Email: |
16.
Richard Garner 《Applied Categorical Structures》2009,17(3):247-285
The small object argument is a transfinite construction which, starting from a set of maps in a category, generates a weak
factorisation system on that category. As useful as it is, the small object argument has some problematic aspects: it possesses
no universal property; it does not converge; and it does not seem to be related to other transfinite constructions occurring
in categorical algebra. In this paper, we give an “algebraic” refinement of the small object argument, cast in terms of Grandis
and Tholen’s natural weak factorisation systems, which rectifies each of these three deficiencies.
相似文献
Richard GarnerEmail: |
17.
Anomaly detection in a mobile communication network 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Alec Pawling Nitesh V. Chawla Greg Madey 《Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory》2007,13(4):407-422
Mobile communication networks produce massive amounts of data which may be useful in identifying the location of an emergency
situation and the area it affects. We propose a one pass clustering algorithm for quickly identifying anomalous data points.
We evaluate this algorithm’s ability to detect outliers in a data set and describe how such an algorithm may be used as a
component of an emergency response management system.
相似文献
Greg MadeyEmail: |
18.
Michael P. Wolf 《Acta Analytica》2007,22(3):207-222
Causal theories of reference in the philosophy of language and philosophy of science have suggested that it could resolve
lingering worries about incommensurability between theoretical claims in different paradigms, to borrow Kuhn’s terms. If we
co-refer throughout different paradigms, then the problems of incommensurability are greatly diminished, according to causal
theorists. I argue that assuring ourselves of that sort of constancy of reference will require comparable sorts of cross-paradigm
affinities, and thus provides us with no special relief on this problem. Suggestions on how to think about rigid designation
across paradigms are included.
相似文献
Michael P. WolfEmail: |
19.
We propose an approach to epistemic justification that incorporates elements of both reliabilism and evidentialism, while
also transforming these elements in significant ways. After briefly describing and motivating the non-standard version of
reliabilism that Henderson and Horgan call “transglobal” reliabilism, we harness some of Henderson and Horgan’s conceptual
machinery to provide a non-reliabilist account of propositional justification (i.e., evidential support). We then invoke this
account, together with the notion of a transglobally reliable belief-forming process, to give an account of doxastic justification.
相似文献
Terry HorganEmail: |
20.
Wayne A. Davis 《Acta Analytica》2008,23(3):207-231
According to Peacocke, concepts are individuated by their possession conditions, which are specified in terms of conditions
in which certain propositions containing those concepts are believed. In support, Peacocke tries to explain what it is for
a thought to have a structure and what it is for a belief to have a propositional content. I show that the possession condition
theory cannot answer such fundamental questions. Peacocke’s theory founders because concepts are metaphysically fundamental.
They individuate the propositions and thoughts containing them, which in turn individuate the propositional attitudes that
are relations to those propositions or thoughts.
相似文献
Wayne A. DavisEmail: |